Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

NJ ShopRite Pharmacies Administer COVID Vaccines to Healthcare Workers

 ShopRite announced that 39 of its pharmacies in New Jersey will administer COVID-19 vaccines to healthcare workers. (Scroll down to see the full list.)

The vaccination rollout is in partnership with the state of New Jersey, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

As part of its partnership with the federal government, ShopRite pharmacies have received an initial shipment of the Moderna vaccine – which requires two inoculations.

ShopRite pharmacies are following the federal government’s distribution schedule, and as part of the first phase, those working in the healthcare profession are prioritized to receive the vaccine.

“We are excited to be part of the initial stages of this unprecedented public health campaign as we begin vaccinating healthcare workers who are on the front lines in the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Jeffrey Mondelli, RPh, Vice President of Pharmacy, Health & Beauty at Wakefern Food Corp., the logistics, distribution and merchandising arm for ShopRite stores.

The store locations were chosen in coordination with the New Jersey State Department of Health, Mondelli said.

Vaccinations are available by appointment only, while supplies last. There is no charge to receive the vaccination.

For additional information regarding one's eligibility or to make an appointment, visit vaccines.shoprite.com.  Due to demand, appointment availability may be limited.

Participating ShopRite pharmacies distributing COVID-19 vaccines to healthcare personnel are:

  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Absecon
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Berlin
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Bernardsville
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Byram
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Chews Landing
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Clark
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Clinton
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of East Brunswick
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Elizabeth
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Englewood
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Flanders
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Glassboro
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Greater Morristown
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Greenwich
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Hamilton Marketplace
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Hazlet
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Hillsborough
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Hunterdon
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Lincoln Park
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Little Falls
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Livingston
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Marlboro
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Marmora
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Medford
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Millville
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Mullica Hill
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Newark
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Newton
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Pennington
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Rio Grande
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Rochelle Park
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Somers Point
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Spotswood
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Union Mill Road
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Upper Deerfield
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Washington
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of West Milford
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Manahawkin
  • ShopRite Pharmacy of Fischer Boulevard

DeWine: Only about 40% of eligible nursing home staff choose to get COVID vax

 During a press conference Tuesday, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine discussed the state’s COVID-19 inoculation rollout, saying that some people who were offered the vaccine chose not to get one.

“As of Sunday, 61% of nursing homes received their first visit from a pharmacy to receive their vaccines — those who wanted to receive the vaccine were able to get it,” DeWine explained. “But only 40% of staff have been taking the vaccine when it’s offered. With residents, it is around 75-80%.”

DeWine encouraged those who work and live in nursing homes to get the vaccine.

Ursel McElroy, the Ohio Department of Aging Director, spoke with the governor during the press conference, explaining that some people are hesitant to get the vaccine due to a number of reasons, including its safety.

She said the state plans to encourage nursing home facility staff and residents to get the vaccine by holding sessions at nursing homes to explain the science behind the shot.

“We’re hoping that their hesitancy is temporary, and that we can replace that with confidence, with confidence that it’s safe to get the vaccine,” McElroy said.

DeWine said that starting Friday, some nursing homes will be getting their second shots. He said that those who did not get a vaccine the first time around will have the opportunity to do so then. Otherwise, they may have to wait a while to receive one.

At this time, Ohio does not require people to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

https://fox8.com/news/coronavirus/dewine-only-about-40-of-eligible-nursing-home-staff-choosing-to-receive-covid-19-vaccine/


US Could, Must Vaccinate 1 Million People A Day: Fauci

 Infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci revealed that the U.S. could start vaccinating one million people per day in the next few days. His statement came after Donald Trump’s Operation Warp Speed failed to meet its target of 20 million vaccinations by the end of 2020.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that as of Dec. 30, only 2.8 million Americans had received their first coronavirus vaccine injections. Despite the vaccine rollout being off to a slow start, however, Dr. Fauci said vaccinations could speed up soon, putting the nation on track to fulfill President-elect Joe Biden’s goal of vaccinating 100 million people in his first 100 days as President.

“We are not where we want to be, there’s no doubt about that, but I think we can get there if we really accelerate, get some momentum going, and see what happens as we get into the first couple of weeks of January,” he said. Citing New York City’s widespread smallpox vaccination efforts in 1947, Dr. Fauci said there’s no reason why the U.S. could not immunize one million per day right now.

“I was a six-year-old boy who was one of those who got vaccinated,” he said. “So if New York City can do 5 million in two weeks, the United States could do a million a day,” he added.

According to reports, the U.S. vaccination rollout has placed a heavy burden on state health departments, which have been tasked to coordinate the vaccination schedules all while dealing with the surge in new coronavirus cases. Most health departments do not have sufficient funding to hire staff to administer doses in large batches, while others lack the expertise to transfer thousands of vaccine doses from local warehouses to individuals. 

“Vaccines sitting on shelves are doing nothing while thousands of Americans are dying,” said Dr. Ashish Jha of Brown University’s School of Public Health. “This is a travesty. This is the most ridiculous example of an incredible ability of our country to be innovative in producing the vaccine and yet inability of our government to help get it to people,” he said, adding that Biden’s administration is going to have a lot of hard work ahead.

https://www.latintimes.com/us-could-vaccinate-1-million-people-day-says-dr-fauci-464598

Viral mutations may cause another ‘very, very bad’ COVID-19 wave

 For COVID-19 researchers, the new year brings a strong sense of déjà vu. As in early 2020, the world is anxiously watching a virus spread in one country and trying to parse the risk for everyone else. This time it is not a completely new threat, but a rapidly spreading variant of SARS-CoV-2. In southeastern England, where the B.1.1.7 variant first caught scientists’ attention last month, it has quickly replaced other variants, and it may be the harbinger of a new, particularly perilous phase of the pandemic.

“One concern is that B.1.1.7 will now become the dominant global variant with its higher transmission and it will drive another very, very bad wave,” says Jeremy Farrar, an infectious disease expert who heads the Wellcome Trust. Whereas the pandemic’s trajectory in 2020 was fairly predictable, “I think we’re going into an unpredictable phase now,” as a result the virus’ evolution, Farrar says.

The concern has led some countries to speed up vaccine authorizations or discuss dosing regimens that may protect more people rapidly. But as the new variant surfaces in multiple countries, many scientists are calling for governments to strengthen existing control measures as well. U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced tough new restrictions on 4 January, including closing schools and asking people not to leave their homes unless strictly necessary. But other countries have hesitated. “I do feel like we are in another situation right now where a lot of Europe is kind of sitting and looking,” says virologist Emma Hodcroft of the University of Basel. “I really hope that this time we can recognize that this is our early alarm bell, and this is our chance to get ahead of this variant.”

In announcing the U.K. restrictions, Johnson said the new variant is between 50% and 70% more transmissible. But researchers have been careful to point out uncertainties. Cases have soared in the United Kingdom over the past month, but the rise occurred while different parts of the country had different levels of restrictions and amid changes in people’s behavior and regional infection rates in the run-up to Christmas—“a complex scenario” that makes it hard to pinpoint the effect of the new variant, says evolutionary biologist Oliver Pybus of the University of Oxford.

Yet evidence has rapidly increased that B.1.1.7’s many mutations, including eight in the crucial spike protein, do enhance spread. “We’re relying on multiple streams of imperfect evidence, but pretty much all that evidence is pointing in the same direction now,” says Adam Kucharski, a modeler at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. For instance, an analysis by Public Health England showed about 15% of the contacts of people infected with B.1.1.7 in England went on to test positive themselves, compared with 10% of contacts of those infected with other variants.

If other countries that have detected B.1.1.7 also see it surge, it will be “the strongest evidence we will have,” Pybus says. In Ireland, where infections have risen rapidly as well, the variant now accounts for a quarter of sequenced cases. And data from Denmark, which leads the European Union in the sequencing of SARS-CoV-2, aren’t reassuring either. Routine surveillance there has picked up the variant dozens of times; its frequency went from 0.2% of sequenced genomes in early December to 2.3% 3 weeks later. “We have had what looks like a poster child example of exponential growth these last 4 weeks in Denmark,” says genomicist Mads Albertsen of Aalborg University. The numbers are still too low to draw strong conclusions, Albertsen cautions, but if the trend continues it will be a clear sign that many countries may face the same problems as the United Kingdom. “We should start preparing ourselves for the fact that this is happening elsewhere,” Hodcroft says. 

I really hope that this time we can recognize that this is our early alarm bell, and this is our chance to get ahead of this variant.

Emma Hodcroft, University of Basel

The lack of evidence—so far—that the new variant makes people sicker is little consolation. Increased transmissibility of a virus is much more treacherous than increased pathogenicity because its effects grow exponentially, Kucharski says. “If you have something that kills 1% of people but a huge number of people get it, that’s going to result in more deaths than something that a small number of people get but it kills 2% of them.”

If the U.K. estimates of a 50% to 75% increase in the virus’ reproduction number, or R, hold true, “keeping the virus from spreading has become a lot harder,” says Viola Priesemann, a physicist at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization who has been modeling the pandemic and the effects of nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as physical distancing and school closures. “In Germany, you would need two big additional measures to keep the reproduction number below 1,” Priesemann says.

There’s growing evidence that mutations in a new SARS-CoV-2 variant helped infections in the United Kingdom soar over the past month.

Confirmed COVID-19 cases per million (7-day average)1 Mar. 202030 Apr.19 Jun.8 Aug.27 Sep.16 Nov.3 Jan. 20210100200300400500600700800773United Kindgom254European Union
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CSSE COVID-19 DATA

Isolating patients and tracing, quarantining, and testing their contacts is one part of any attempt at doing so; those measures alone can reduce R from about 2 to about 1, Priesemann has shown for Germany. But that effect breaks down when case numbers reach a critical threshold and public health authorities are overwhelmed, which means tougher measures now can help contain the spread of the new variant later. “It’s yet another reason to go for very low numbers,” says Priesemann, who co-authored a December 2020 letter to the The Lancet calling for Europe to adopt a joint strategy to bring down infections fast. Hodcroft agrees. “The case has never been stronger,” she says. “What’s the worst-case scenario here? We overshoot and we get cases so low that we can get rid of a lot of restrictions.”

Curtailing infections sharply has the added benefit of reducing the chances for the virus to evolve even further. Already other variants have emerged, notably one called 501Y.V2 in South Africa, that are just as worrying as B.1.1.7, Farrar adds. “It is essentially a numbers game: The more virus is circulating, the more chance mutants have to appear,” he says. In the long term, mutations could arise that threaten the efficacy of vaccines.

It’s dispiriting to feel like the world is back where it was in early 2020, says epidemiologist William Hanage of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “But we have to stop this virus. … Fatalism is not a nonpharmaceutical intervention.”

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/viral-mutations-may-cause-another-very-very-bad-covid-19-wave-scientists-warn

Why BofA Is Upgrading Tenet Healthcare, Downgrading DaVita

 DaVita Inc. 

DVA 0.01% is focused on dialysis, which means that it is unlikely to get much of a boost from a reacceleration in volumes within health care, of which Tenet Healthcare Corp THC 6.26% is a key beneficiary, according to BofA Securities.

The Health Care Analyst: Kevin Fischbeck downgraded DaVita from Buy to Neutral and raised the price target from $122 to $127. In a separate note, the analyst upgraded Tenet Healthcare from Neutral to Buy and raised the price target from $45 to $50.

The Health Care Thesis: The Medicare rate environment is positive, and DaVita should continue to exhibit strong cost control, which makes the core story still strong, Fischbeck said in the downgrade note.

Medicare Advantage should “start to deliver” in 2021, the analyst said.

“With rates in MA 10-20% above Medicare fee for service, this is an area of upside for the industry and an investment theme in 2020,” he said. 

Fischbeck said in a separate note that Tenet Healthcare delivered strong performance through the pandemic, including "strong cost control" and a business shift to ambulatory surgery centers, which he said are faster-growing and less capital intensive.

“The growing ASC exposure (42% of the company) positions THC better than its peers to deal with the structural shift in surgeries to the outpatient setting or additional spikes in COVID,” the analyst said.

Even the company’s high leverage should be beneficial for “shareholder returns over the next year,” given the sector tailwinds and business mix shift, according to BofA. 

https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/01/19017965/why-bofa-is-upgrading-tenet-healthcare-downgrading-davita

Decades of basic research paved way for ‘warp speed’ Covid-19 vaccines

 


The emergency use authorizations of mRNA vaccines by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna and the likely gradual rollout of multiple others is our collective best hope for curtailing the Covid-19 pandemic.

The speed at which these vaccines has been developed is remarkable, both in absolute terms and compared to the multiyear time frame it normally takes to create and approve new vaccines. Great credit is due to the pharmaceutical industry and the university and government scientists who have worked directly and diligently on Covid-19 vaccine programs in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere. They deserve accolades for their skillful hard work.

But the Covid-19 vaccines did not come from nowhere. Decades of research by tens of thousands of scientists worldwide put in place the essential knowledge and methods that underpinned their rapid development.

In the U.S. alone, the National Institutes of Health provides approximately $4 billion dollars a year to immunology and vaccine research programs, with further substantial support from private funders such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. These multiyear, multimillion dollar investments in basic science provided the foundation from which the new vaccines rapidly emerged.

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, is a coronavirus. Research over the past two decades on the earlier severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus and its cousin, the virus that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), taught virologists and vaccine designers a great deal about coronaviruses, their vulnerabilities, and how they might best be exploited.

A cadre of researchers with critically important knowledge of this virus family was able to guide the scientific community in how to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Many of the technologies now used widely for vaccine design are rooted in longstanding programs to fight HIV and influenza. For various reasons that relate to the properties of the viruses themselves, those pathogens are much more difficult to vaccinate against than SARS-CoV-2, but the accrued knowledge of how to counter them has been invaluable.

The recently approved monoclonal antibody Covid-19 therapies from Eli Lilly and Regeneron also benefitted greatly from the techniques used to identify and produce similar antibodies for HIV clinical trials and also led to the antibody cocktails that were used to treat people infected with Ebola virus.

When Chinese scientists published the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence on the internet on Jan. 10, 2020, multiple vaccine programs were started within days because existing vaccine design methods could be repurposed.

All of the leading vaccines are based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the entity on the virus surface that drives infection of human cells. Humans infected with SAR-CoV-2 raise antibodies against the spike-protein that prevent further infection by neutralizing the virus.

The various vaccines present the spike protein to the immune systems in different way but with a common purpose: triggering the immune system to produce antibodies that neutralize the virus as soon as it is encountered, thereby preventing or limiting the infection.

Decades of work, first on the corresponding HIV spike protein and then its counterparts from other viruses, including SARS, MERS, and seasonal coronaviruses, showed how best to design and produce the SARS-CoV-2 version. Sophisticated methods to image the spike proteins via recent advances in electron microscopy allowed researchers and vaccine makers rapidly to study what they were making, gaining assurances that they were on the right track.

The Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna/NIH vaccines deliver the spike protein in the form of mRNA. This technology emerged during the past decade from university laboratories working on HIV and influenza vaccines, which then triggered Zika, Ebola, and coronavirus vaccine programs at the NIH and in the pharmaceutical industry. The Moderna mRNA vaccine, in particular, was made as a collaboration with the NIH’s Vaccine Research Center, funded by U.S. taxpayers since 1997 to create vaccines against deadly viruses and other human diseases. A method developed by Janssen, a pharmaceutical company, to present spike proteins to the immune system also emerged from an HIV vaccine program at Harvard University. AstraZeneca’s version of the adenovirus delivery system has a similar history. Decades of work on the corresponding HIV and influenza proteins, as well as coronavirus proteins, underpin the Novavax SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccine design. DNA vaccines are also in clinical trials, another method derived from research on HIV and other viral pathogens.

Some of the vaccine trials have been conducted by the pharmaceutical industry. However, an extensive network of trial sites funded by the NIH for HIV vaccine clinical research is playing a key role. Fundamental immunology research programs in U.S. universities developed the techniques to study how humans respond both to viruses like SARS-CoV-2 and the vaccines that counter them. Existing methods only needed to be adjusted for the new virus. Comparisons to immune responses in infected people will be essential for understanding how the Covid-19 vaccines perform in the longer term.

U.S. taxpayers are spending approximately $18 billion dollars on the production and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines via Operation Warp Speed. That effort would not have been possible without the prior expenditure of much smaller sums on basic immunology and vaccinology research. As two researchers who have spent many years working on viral pathogens, we believe that this funding has been very well-spent.

Funding scientific research is buying an insurance policy for a better future. The benefits are not always apparent, and sometimes become visible only over many years. 2020 is a case in point: The nation’s existing research infrastructure laid the groundwork for Covid-19 vaccines to be designed within weeks of the emergence of a deadly virus and produced within months.

We cannot know when the next global health crisis will hit, but we do know that continuing to support medical science is essential for a rapid and effective response when it does.

John P. Moore is a professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City. Ian A. Wilson is professor and chair of the Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif.

https://www.statnews.com/2021/01/05/basic-research-paved-way-for-warp-speed-covid-19-vaccines/

CDC's Messonnier: Slow vaccine rollout should speed up ‘pretty massively’ in coming weeks

 


Nancy Messonnier, a top federal health official involved in the distribution of Covid-19 vaccines, predicted on Tuesday that delays in the administration of the shots would improve soon, even as public health experts have piled up complaints about the slow rollout and about the gap between the number of doses distributed versus those actually going into people’s arms.

“I really expect the pace of administration to go up pretty massively in the next couple weeks,” Messonnier, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said in a conversation with STAT infectious disease reporter Helen Branswell.

Only a fraction of the Covid-19 vaccines distributed so far have been administered to health care workers and residents and staff of long-term care facilities, the first priority group for the immunizations. But Messonnier noted that the two vaccines regulators have so far authorized — one from Moderna and one from a partnership between Pfizer and BioNTech — are both based on an mRNA platform that’s never resulted in a successful vaccine before, and that both come with new distribution, storage, and administration protocols.

The vaccines also started arriving over the holidays, as health departments and hospitals were facing huge numbers of Covid-19 cases and hospitalizations. That also contributed to delays.

Now, Messonnier said, providers know what they’re dealing with, and the efficiency with which the shots are administered should improve.

“It’s the early stages of a really complicated task, but a task that we’re up for,” she said.

A CDC advisory group has issued recommendations for who should be prioritized for the shots given the limited supply, ranking groups based on their risk of exposure and who is at highest risk for more severe Covid-19. Local jurisdictions are adapting the recommendations to their own plans. But Messonnier encouraged providers to use their full supply of the vaccines, even if people wind up getting the shots ahead of their spot in line.

If, for example, one facility still has supply but no one left in a particular category to vaccinate, it should move to people in the next tier, Messonnier said.

“I really hope that articulating these phases … isn’t leading to unnecessary barriers,” she said. She added: “Don’t leave vaccine in the fridge. Don’t leave vaccine in the vial.”

But Messonnier said she didn’t support strategies the British authorities are taking to expand their vaccine supply, namely stretching out the interval between when the first and second doses are given, or potentially swapping different vaccines for people’s two doses. She noted that the clinical trial data that demonstrated the vaccines’ effectiveness came from using the same vaccine for the two doses given at specific intervals three or four weeks apart.

Her comments echoed a statement from top officials at the Food and Drug Administration Monday, who stressed the “importance of receiving Covid-19 vaccines according to how they’ve been authorized by the FDA in order to safely receive the level of protection observed in the large randomized trials supporting their effectiveness.”

Messonnier also said she didn’t think the two vaccines authorized so far could be deployed to certain communities to control particularly bad outbreaks given that the full protection wasn’t conferred until the second dose was administered. If a single-dose vaccine was shown to elicit protection quickly, she said, that could be a better tool.

“Diverting the vaccine to try to put out a forest fire probably isn’t the right strategy with these vaccines,” she said.

During the early days of what became the Covid-19 pandemic, Messonnier held regular press briefings about the spread of the coronavirus and famously warned in late February of potentially “severe” disruptions to daily life. Her comment, however, reportedly infuriated President Trump, and Messonnier receded from public view for months while continuing her work at the CDC.

More recently, however, Messonnier has returned to more frequent public appearances.

During the discussion Tuesday, Messonnier said she hoped the supply of vaccine would expand greatly in the spring, a time when the shots could be made more widely available to the general public, not just people with certain jobs or health conditions. But making the vaccine is only one step: successfully inoculating the vast majority of the population will require major efforts to educate the public, to build out accessible sites where people can easily get vaccinated, and to ensure individual people show up when it’s their turn to get the shot.

“It’s going to take some work from all of us working together to make the best use of the vaccine as quickly as possible,” she said.

Messonnier suggested that churches, schools, and stadiums could all become vaccine venues as a way to make it as easy as possible for people to get them — in addition to traditional sites like doctors’ offices or pharmacies. But Branswell noted that providers needed to be ready to treat side effects from the vaccines, including anaphylaxis, the severe allergic reaction that has been seen in a few people who have received the shots so far.

Messonnier noted that there have been more than a dozen cases of anaphylaxis so far associated with the vaccines, out of more than 4 million doses administered. Still, she said, sites need to be ready to treat anyone who might have a severe reaction with EpiPens and know what to do if they need more advanced care.

“Is that a complication? Certainly,” she said. “Can we work our way through it? Yes.”

https://www.statnews.com/2021/01/05/nancy-messonnier-stat-interview/