Search This Blog

Thursday, September 1, 2022

Biden pushing another round of Covid boosters. Who’s listening?

Federal health officials are starting to push new, variant-targeting vaccines that they say will curb a winter coronavirus wave and protect America’s most medically vulnerable people. The question is whether Americans feel any urgency to get them.

The updated vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer and BioNTech, authorized Wednesday by the Food and Drug Administration, are tailored to fighting back the dominant BA.4 and BA.5 strains. Biden officials hope the fresh doses can push down coronavirus case rates that have plateaued at roughly 400 deaths and more than 5,000 hospitalizations a day — and then stave off an all-but-assured case surge in the coming months.

The administration is “planning a robust public education campaign, building on lessons we’ve learned, and focusing on those most at-risk,” a White House official told STAT. Those efforts include a weekly survey of at least 1,500 people on the fence about getting a booster, outreach to community leaders and text alerts from pharmacies to encourage boosters, they added. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will convene an expert panel Thursday to discuss recommending the vaccines to the broader U.S. population, which they are expected to do.

However, vaccine experts are already split about the benefits of offering the doses broadly. And their debate is playing out publicly, even as coronavirus fatigue sets in among many Americans who have already snubbed existing boosters.

The Health and Human Services Department initially ordered 175 million doses of the new vaccines, enough to cover nearly half of Americans. But just a third of eligible people, about 100 million, have followed nearly year-old guidance to get one additional booster of the original shots. Younger people, especially, have faltered at getting extra doses as the pandemic drags into a third year and severe cases decline.

That’s left the administration in a quandary: Most Americans might not get, or even particularly need, another booster right now. But plenty of people still do.

“No one’s under any illusion that the demand is going to be what it was in 2020,” a senior Biden official told STAT. “But it’s absolutely critical that we focus on those who are at risk.”

Complicating the matter, Biden officials are tiptoeing around messaging on what the updated shots can do, and what they can’t, stymied in part by the fact that there is not yet solid human data. Officials and outside allies described to STAT a need to temper expectations that this booster will protect against future variants, or to dispel notions that this booster might be the last one a person needs.

Infectious disease experts say the administration is also bruised from earlier missteps, such as describing breakthrough cases as exceedingly rare or not stressing enough that while vaccines vastly curb severe infection, mild cases will still happen.

“Very early on, we never quite had explained to the American public what are reasonable expectations for protection against this kind of virus,” said outside FDA adviser Paul Offit, a pediatrician with the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who is critical of the strategy to boost nearly all American people.

The “horrible public messaging” started early, says Eric Topol, founder and director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute.

“The unwillingness to accept boosters was because of mass confusion, starting in August of 2021, that’s never been cleared off,” he said, referring to the first reports of breakthrough cases. “Then [there was] this unrealistic expectation about vaccine preventing infection and transmission, which was true, with a booster, all the way through until we got to Omicron.”

The FDA authorized Pfizer and BioNTech’s shot as a booster for people 12 and older, and Moderna’s for people 18 and older.

Administration officials admit that they are not sure how long the new vaccine’s protection will last, a foggy question that shifts with each new variant’s lessons. They also are careful not to promise reduced transmission, particularly without solid human data for the new vaccines on the table. But they are confident that the updated vaccines are safe since they are edits on already-vetted shots.

“This will hopefully give us the kind of immunity we need right now,” FDA vaccine chief Peter Marks said during a Wednesday press briefing about the authorizations.

Marks and FDA Commissioner Robert Califf have already wrestled with some scientists’ complaints, including Offit’s, that the agency is moving too fast to authorize the vaccines on limited data. The two point to annual updates to influenza vaccines, which rely on small updates to original formulations and skip large-scale human studies to deliver seasonal vaccines quickly.

“We want to make sure that when we make data available publicly, that we’re confident in those data because a couple of times during this pandemic I personally have experienced where we went forward too quickly, and had to double back,” Marks told reporters.

That means data could take “one to two months” to land, he added.

In the meantime, public health experts question how many people will be in line for new shots as they roll out in the coming weeks, dampened both by data questions and the public’s growing complacency towards pandemic measures.

“This one is gonna be the toughest sell yet,” said Richard Besser, CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and a former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “For some people who’ve been willing to roll up their sleeve for other boosters, they may say, ‘I want to wait.’”

The question is what they are waiting for. More human data may assuage some peoples’ concerns, but public health experts say a broader conversation about who needs boosters and when they should be administered is on the horizon.

Offit, for instance, wants to see the country move to an annual booster schedule that focuses on medically vulnerable populations.

Topol argues that the government needs to focus on a so-called universal coronavirus vaccine that would ideally battle multiple incoming strains. Biden officials say that is months if not years away, and they need more funding, which has stalled in Congress.

Those experts acknowledge that the real concern in the looming booster campaign is older and immuno-compromised people, and that they are struggling to maintain the urgency that fueled earlier scrambles to get vaccinated.

“I’m not sure how you break through,” said Besser. “You want people to get on with their lives, and you want people who are at increased risk of severe disease to remain protected. You don’t want to lead with fear as a nation.”

https://www.statnews.com/2022/08/31/the-biden-administration-is-pushing-another-round-of-covid-boosters-whos-listening/

Pliant Aces Phase 2 Safety Review for Pulmonary Fibrosis Med

 Recent independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) review recommended the INTEGRIS-IPF Phase 2a trial continue without modification

Interim 12-week data expected in early 2023

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/pliant-therapeutics-announces-positive-dsmb-safety-review-of-integris-ipf-phase-2a-trial-of-pln-74809-at-320-mg-dose-in-idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis/

Border Agents: Biden Press Sec "Extremely Dumb Or Flat-Out Lying" About Migrant Crisis

 by Steve Watson via Summit news,

Border Patrol agents have described White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre as “extremely dumb” following her claims earlier this week that migrants are not “walking across” the southern border.

As we highlighted, Jean-Pierre sparred with Fox News reporter Peter Doocy who asked her “Somebody unvaccinated comes over on a plane, you say that’s not okay. Somebody walks into Texas or Arizona unvaccinated, they’re allowed to stay?”

The Press Secretary asserted that “That’s not how it works. It’s not like someone walks over,” to which Doocy shot back “That’s exactly what is happening! Thousands of people are walking in a day.”

The back and forth between the two continued Wednesday as Doocy pointed out that there is a Fentanyl epidemic being fuelled by illegal border crossings:

Fox News reports that Border Patrol agents responded to Jean-Pierre’s comments with disbelief.

“How out of touch can this administration possibly be?” one agent said adding, “Well, I guess this is a new level.”

“There’s only two reasons she said that, and that is either she is extremely dumb or she is flat-out lying and hopes America is so stupid we would believe her,” another agent commented.

The agent continued, “18 USC 1001 says it is a federal crime to knowingly make false statements to the U.S. government. Too bad the government is not held to the same standard as the citizenry, and that is assuming [Jean-Pierre] is not dumb but just a liar.”

Another agent told the network “She is absolutely ignorant to the reality of all the documented footage or just continuing [Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro] Mayorkas’ delusional lie,” adding that “This administration must believe that the American people are fools like their mainstream media comrades.”

“Has [Jean-Pierre] ever visited the actual border to see for herself what is happening? Nope,” another agent proclaimed.

National Border Patrol Council president Brandon Judd urged that “I watch these people walk across the border every single day. We see it. It’s disgusting what we’re seeing. And she knows exactly what’s happening. But she’s deflecting. She’s lying. She knows that the mainstream media isn’t going to cover this issue.”

Judd continued, “They don’t care that hundreds of thousands of people are dying because of drug overdoses because of these illegal immigrants that are coming across the borders illegally, that the cartels then create the opportunities. They don’t care what is currently happening. They know that it’s not hurting them. So, they’re going to continue to lie to the American public.”

The Border Patrol are being told to literally unlock gates for illegal immigrants to walk into the country and get bussed to cities like New York.

According to data from Customs and Border Protection, more than two million people have attempted to cross the border in the 2022 fiscal year so far.

That figure equates to a 22 year high.

Raul Ortiz, The Head of The U.S. Border Patrol has also testified under oath that he believes the Biden administration’s policy of “no consequences” for illegal immigrants trying to enter the country has made the border less safe, caused an exponential increase in people attempting to cross, and has directly caused what he believes constitutes a “crisis”.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/border-patrol-agents-white-house-press-secretary-either-extremely-dumb-or-flat-out-lying

Cannabis Industry Cribs Big Tobacco's Social Responsibility Initiatives

 Cannabis companies in the United States and Canada have developed corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices that mirror those of the tobacco industry, according to recent data.

A qualitative study of cannabis companies' CSR practices over 10 years found, for example, that dispensary Trulieve provided $15,000 for internships and $20,000 for scholarships to prepare Black students for careers in the cannabis industry. The tobacco industry has used similar initiatives to foster good will and market its products to minority populations.

Tanner Wakefield

"The main message from this paper is that this is an industry selling a product with health impacts," said study author Tanner Wakefield, an associate specialist at the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco. "We have seen how the tobacco industry in the past has used corporate social responsibility practices to insulate itself politically, engender public good will, and encourage consumption of tobacco products with harmful health effects."

The study was published online August 23 in JAMA Network Open.

A Double Agenda

The investigators identified nine of the 10 largest publicly traded cannabis companies in the US and Canada and examined the CSR activities that they conducted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021. The investigators also conducted a systematic review of corporate websites and Nexis Uni articles that identified 153 news stories, press releases, and web pages that communicated about cannabis companies' charitable and philanthropic activities.

Investigators identified themes in CSR activities by categorizing the language and informational patterns in the evidence they collected. They divided CSR practices into five categories, consisting of campaigns supposedly mitigating the harmful effects of past cannabis prohibition; initiatives characterized as promoting or increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion; charitable contributions; researching therapeutic cannabis uses and increasing medical access; and efforts claiming to address harms related to cannabis legalization.

The investigators observed that Green Thumb Industries and Cresco Labs set up "business incubators" and licensing assistance programs targeted toward members of racial and ethnic minority populations and communities most affected by cannabis prohibition. Canopy Growth Corporation supported research into whether medical cannabis could alleviate sleep disorders or treat mental health conditions. The company also collaborated with Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy and Parent Action on Drugs to create materials for preventing cannabis abuse among youth.

"I think we need to remember that this is an industry selling a product," said Wakefield. "And just because there is merit to addressing certain issues or harms, that doesn't mean we should forget that they are businesses seeking to make a profit. While CSR activities may have some potential benefits or apparent legitimacy, we have to remember that CSR is also a form of marketing and political influence."

The investigators concluded that these CSR activities were similar to CSR strategies that the tobacco industry previously had used to encourage consumption, target marginalized communities, influence regulation, and advance corporate interests.

"A similarity to the tobacco industry is that they would provide funding or assistance to nonprofit groups that are not necessarily tied to cannabis or tobacco," said Wakefield. For example, the investigators noted that cannabis companies contributed funding for breast cancer research and for veterans.

Moreover, the investigators observed "similarities in terms of focus and orientation toward special interest populations," said Wakefield. Those special populations included the LGBTQ communities, and activities included sponsoring or participating in pride celebrations and releasing limited-edition pride products.

Overall, the cannabis industry engages in CSR activities that appear to mitigate the harmful effects of its products and operations, said Wakefield.

'Incomplete Information'

Jason W. Busse, DC, PhD, associate director of the Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, described the study as rigorous, but with limitations acknowledged by the authors.

Jason Busse DC PhD

"Understanding how these companies are promoting themselves and justifying themselves as good corporate citizens is important," said Busse. "The investigators have undertaken a comprehensive study and identified CSR activities that cannabis companies are engaging in. We know from past experiences with tobacco companies that these activities may be used in part to encourage less regulation and increase market access."


One constraint of the study is that the investigators used documents that were in the public domain, as opposed to internal company information. "The investigators were limited to the information that they were able to access," said Busse. "Unless you use the Freedom of Information Act to compel companies to release internal documents, you don’t have that information. They haven’t done that, and it is almost a certainty that the authors had to work with incomplete information."

The investigators suggest a need for oversight of the cannabis industry’s CSR practices, and Busse agreed with this assessment. "While engagement in social responsibility activities by cannabis corporations may have positive results, there should be independent assessment of outcomes. For example, sponsoring research may be problematic if such support comes with strings attached, such as suppressing or modifying unfavorable findings," he said.

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. Wakefield and Busse report no relevant financial relationships.

JAMA Network Open. Published online August 23, 2022. Full text.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/980109

Best Way to Estimate Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

 What's the most practical, inexpensive, and effective way to estimate a patient's risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D)? According to a study published in PLOS One, when it came to predicting the risk of developing T2D, none of the anthropometric indices commonly used in clinical practice — body adiposity index (BAI), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and triglycerides-glucose index (TyG) — were superior to waist circumference (WC) or body mass index (BMI).

This was the finding made by researchers — from, among others, Stanford University, Stanford, California, in the United States and the Heart Institute (InCor) at the University of São Paulo Medical School Clinics Hospital (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil — based on a 5-year follow-up of a group of adults living in Baependi, a small rural town in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Medscape interviewed the following three of the study's authors: Camila Maciel de Oliveira, MD, PhD, endocrinologist at InCor, researcher at Stanford University, Stanford, California, and consultant for health-tech startups; Rafael de Oliveira Alvim, PhD, professor of physiological sciences at the Federal University of Amazonas Manaus, Brazil (UFAM),; and endocrinologist Carlos Alberto Mourão Júnior, MD, PhD, professor at the Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil (UFJF).

The cohort consisted of 1091 individuals who had been recruited in the Baependi Heart Study. The mean age of the participants was 47 ± 15 years; 57% were women. They attended two health examinations cycles: cycle one (2005-2006) and cycle two (2010-2013).

The authors evaluated the association between BMI, WC, BAI, VAI, and TyG and the incidence of T2D.

All participants were free of T2D at baseline. After a 5-year follow-up, however, 3.8% of them developed the disease. These patients had the worst metabolic profile, with higher hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity rates.

One unit increase in BAI was associated with an 8% increase in the risk of developing T2D, and VAI was associated with a risk increase of 11%. Moreover, a one-unit increase in TyG was associated with more than four times the risk of developing T2D. TyG had the most substantial predictive power among all three indices.

The results show that, as expected, TyG has a more significant potential than BAI and VAI as a predictor of T2D. This superiority is likely to be clinically explained by the fact that TyG is associated with insulin resistance, which is known to be a determining factor in the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of T2D. Conversely, TyG (as well as the other adiposity indices) loses its predictive value when the statistical models are adjusted for conventional measures of body fat (BMI and WC).

The authors mentioned that, to standardize the study participants, it's important to adjust for a covariate. "We saw that BMI and waist circumference are factors that significantly influence the prediction of risk. The reasons for that have been extensively examined in the literature. General obesity — BMI — and abdominal obesity are mandatory predictors of risk for diseases like type 2 diabetes, as well as hypertension and dyslipidemia," they pointed out.

In addition, they stated that studies published during the past few years support the observation that "BMI is still superior to all the other adiposity indices tested, both for T2D and for hypertension (at a 5-year follow-up and also at a 10-year follow-up)."

The authors said that the indices they assessed considered low-cost clinical and laboratory exams and, therefore, their study and other studies that have highlighted the relevance of these tools give the clinician an incentive to incorporate them into regular practice.

"Excel itself can be used to calculate these indices for predicting the risk for some chronic noncommunicable diseases. That is, this could be a practical and inexpensive way to help, and also to encourage, the patient to make lifestyle changes. It'd be an additional tool for promoting health, especially in the population as a whole," the three authors emphasized. They also mentioned that several health startups have been working on compiling patient data, with the support of the Research Ethics Committee, and data recorded in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry to develop and perfect algorithms that make sense with respect to the population of Brazil.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/980111

US Manufacturing Surveys Signal Weakest Growth In Over 2 Years, Prices Paid Plunges

 S&P Global's Manufacturing surveys for August have not been pretty. Turkey, Italy, Germany, UK, the Eurozone aggregate, and Canada all printed below 50 this morning (in contraction) but US Manufacturing was expected to hold just above the Maginot Line at 51.3 and it did. However, the final August print of 51.5 (small improvement over the flash print) is the weakest since July 2020. The ISM Manufacturing survey was flat at 52.8 from July (better than the 51.9 expected)...

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly, S&P Global notes that 'delivery delays are the least extensive since October 2020' - which in our new normal is actually a good sign that supply chain disruptions are easing, BUT - just as it impacted the index on the way up, the PMI model sees this as a negative since in the old normal this would imply a weakening of demand.

Meanwhile, S&P Global reports that employment rose at the second-slowest rate in over two years as new orders fell for the third successive month.

Under the hood of the ISM print, Prices Paid plunged but this survey claims employment and new orders improved

Source: Bloomberg

The picture remains very murky however, as one ISM respondent:

“Demand from customers is still strong, but much of that is because there is still fear of not getting product due to constraints. They are stocking up. There will be a reckoning in the market when the music stops, and everyone’s inventories are bloated."

Additional comments are mixed:

“Sales in target business softening month-over-month, down 12 percent by revenue. Inventory days are increasing.” [Chemical Products]

Inventories are far too high, and we are on pins and needles to see how quickly and at what magnitude our busy season begins. We will start seeing that in the next few weeks.” [Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products]

"Demand is softening; however, we are continuing to produce to replenish inventory.” [Primary Metals]

“Orders are still strong through the end of the year, but there is a feeling that customers may start pulling back on orders, either cancelling them or pushing them into 2023.” [Plastics & Rubber Products]

Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said:

“US factory production was down for a second month running in August, with demand for goods having now fallen for three straight months amid the ongoing impact of soaring inflation, supply constraints, rising interest rates and growing economic uncertainty about the economic outlook.

“Worryingly, the sharpest drop in demand was recorded for business equipment and machinery, which points to falling investment spending and heightened risk aversion. Similarly, payroll growth slowed close to stalling, reflecting a growing reticence to expand workforce numbers in the face of a deteriorating demand environment.

Falling demand for raw materials has, however, taken pressure off supply chains and helped shift some of the pricing power away from sellers towards buyers. Likewise, we are seeing more manufacturers reduce their selling prices to drive sales. Although still elevated by historical standards, the survey’s inflation gauges are now at their lowest for one and a half years, which should help to bring consumer price inflation down in the coming months.”

Finally, we note that barring the initial pandemic lockdowns months, this is the steepest downturn in US manufacturing seen since the global financial crisis in 2009.

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/us-manufacturing-surveys-signal-weakest-growth-over-2-years-prices-paid-plunges

Illumina wins case against U.S. FTC on Grail purchase

 A judge has ruled in favor of Illumina Inc in its acquisition of Grail Inc dealing a blow to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's efforts to unwind the multi-billion-dollar deal, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter.

The FTC had sought to stop Illumina's $7.1 billion proposed acquisition of cancer detection test maker Grail, alleging it would harm innovation and boost prices.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/illumina-wins-case-against-u-162330222.html