Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 25, 2022

Inexpensive, readily available chemical may limit impact of COVID-19

 Preclinical studies in mice that model human COVID-19 suggest that an inexpensive, readily available amino acid might limit the effects of the disease and provide a new off-the-shelf therapeutic option for infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants and perhaps future novel coronaviruses.

A team led by researchers at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA report in Frontiers in Immunology that an amino acid called GABA, which is available over-the-counter in many countries, reduced disease severity, viral load in the lungs, and death rates in SARS-CoV-2-infected mice. This follows up on their previous finding that GABA consumption also protected mice from another lethal mouse coronavirus called MHV-1. In both cases, GABA treatment was effective when given just after infection or several days later near the peak of virus production. The protective effects of GABA against two different types of coronaviruses suggest that GABA may provide a generalizable therapy to help treat diseases induced by new SARS-CoV-2 variants and novel beta-coronaviruses.

"SARS-CoV-2 variants and novel coronaviruses will continue to arise, and they may not be efficiently controlled by available vaccines and antiviral medications. Furthermore, the generation of new vaccines is likely to be much slower than the spread of new variants," said senior author Daniel L. Kaufman, a researcher and professor in Molecular and Medical Pharmacology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Accordingly, new therapeutic options are needed to limit the severity of these infections. Their previous studies showed that GABA administration protected mice from developing severe disease after infection with a mouse coronavirus called MHV-1. To more stringently test the potential of GABA as a therapy for COVID-19, they studied transgenic mice that when infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop severe pneumonia with a high mortality rate. "If our observations of the protective effects of GABA therapy in SARS-CoV-2-infected mice are confirmed in clinical trials, GABA could provide an off-the-shelf treatment to help ameliorate infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants. GABA is inexpensive and stable at room temperature, which could make it widely and easily accessible, and especially beneficial in developing countries."

The researchers said that GABA and GABA receptors are most often thought of as a major neurotransmitter system in the brain. Years ago, they, as well as other researchers, found that cells of the immune system also possessed GABA receptors and that the activation of these receptors inhibited the inflammatory actions of immune cells. Taking advantage of this property, the authors reported in a series of studies that GABA administration inhibited autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis in mouse models of these ailments.

Other scientists who study gas anesthetics have found that lung epithelial cells also possess GABA receptors and that drugs that activate these receptors could limit lung injuries and inflammation in the lung. The dual actions of GABA in inflammatory immune cells and lung , along with its safety for clinical use, made GABA a theoretically appealing candidate for limiting the overreactive immune responses and lung damage due to coronavirus infection.

Working with colleagues at the University of Southern California, the UCLA research team in this study administered GABA to the mice just after infection with SARS-CoV-2, or two days later when the virus levels are near their peak in the mouse lungs. While the vast majority of untreated mice did not survive this infection, those given GABA just after infection, or two days later, had less illness severity and a lower mortality rate over the course of the study. Treated mice also displayed reduced levels of virus in their lungs and changes in circulating immune signaling molecules, known as cytokines and chemokines, toward patterns that were associated with better outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Thus, GABA receptor activation had multiple beneficial effects in this mouse model that are also desirable for the treatment of COVID-19.

The authors hope that their new findings will provide a springboard for testing the efficacy of GABA treatment in clinical trials with COVID-19 patients. Since GABA has an excellent safety record, is inexpensive and available worldwide, clinical trials of GABA treatment for COVID-19 can be initiated rapidly.

The authors also suspect that the anti-inflammatory properties of GABA-receptor activating drugs may also be useful for limiting inflammation in the central nervous system that is associated with long-COVID. Indeed, this approach was very successful in their previous studies of therapeutics for multiple sclerosis in , a disease which is caused by an inflammatory autoimmune response in the brain. The authors speculate that such drugs may reduce both the deleterious effects of coronavirus  in the periphery and limit inflammation in the central nervous system.

Unfortunately, there has been no pharmaceutical interest pursuing GABA therapy for COVID-19, presumably because it is not patentable and widely available as a dietary supplement. The authors hope for  to continue this line of study.

The researchers emphasize that unless  are conducted and GABA is approved for treating COVID-19 by relevant governing bodies, it should not be consumed for the treatment of COVID-19 since it could pose , such as dampening beneficial immune or physiological responses.

Additional authors include Jide Tian, Barbara Dillion, High Containment Program at UCLA, and Jill Henley and Lucio Comai, Keck School of Medicine at USC.


Explore further

The relevance of GABA for diabetes highlighted in two new studies

More information: A GABA-receptor agonist reduces pneumonitis severity, viral load, and death rate in SARS-CoV-2-infected mice, Frontiers in Immunology (2022). DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1007955
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-10-inexpensive-readily-chemical-limit-impact.html

Word and face recognition can be adequately supported with half a brain, study finds

 An unprecedented study of brain plasticity and visual perception has found that people who, as children, had undergone surgery removing half of their brain, correctly recognized differences between pairs of words or faces more than 80% of the time. Considering the volume of removed brain tissue, the surprising accuracy highlights the brain's capacity—and its limitations—to rewire itself and adapt to dramatic surgery or traumatic injury.

The findings, published by University of Pittsburgh researchers today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), is the first-ever attempt to characterize  in humans and understand whether a single  hemisphere can perform functions typically split between the two sides of the brain.

"The question of whether the brain is prewired with its functional capabilities from birth or if it dynamically organizes its function as it matures and experiences the environment drives much of vision science and neurobiology," said senior author Marlene Behrmann, Ph.D., professor of ophthalmology and psychology at the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University. "Working with hemispherectomy patients allowed us to study the upper bounds of functional capacity of a single brain hemisphere. With the results from this study, we now have a foot in the door of human neuroplasticity and can finally begin examining the capabilities of brain reorganization."

Neuroplasticity is a process that allows the brain to change its activity and rewire itself, either structurally or functionally, in response to changes in the environment. And even though brain plasticity peaks early in development, our brains continue to change well into adulthood.

As humans age, the two halves of our brains, called hemispheres, become increasingly specialized. Even though this division of labor is not absolute, the two hemispheres adopt distinct chief responsibilities: The left hemisphere matures into the primary place for reading printed words, and the right hemisphere matures into the primary place for recognizing faces.

But neuroplasticity has limitations, and this hemispheric preference becomes more rigid over time. In some cases, adults who develop a brain lesion because of stroke or a tumor might experience a reading impairment or become face blind, depending on whether the left or right hemisphere of the brain is affected.

But what happens when the brain is forced to change and adapt while it is still highly plastic? To answer this question, researchers looked at a special group of patients who had undergone a complete hemispherectomy—or a surgical removal of one hemisphere to control epileptic seizures—during childhood.

Because hemispherectomies are relatively rare, scientists seldom have access to more than a handful of patients at a time. But the Pitt team found an unexpected silver lining of the COVID-19 pandemic: the normalization of telemedicine services, which made it possible to enroll 40 hemispherectomy patients, an unprecedented number for studies of this kind.

To assess word recognition capacity, researchers presented their participants pairs of words, each differing by only one letter, such as "soap" and "soup" or "tank" and "tack." To test how well the children recognized different faces, scientists showed them pairs of photos of people. Either stimulus appeared on the screen for only a fraction of a second, and the participants had to decide whether the pair of words or the pair of faces were the same or different.

Astoundingly, the single remaining hemisphere supported both of those functions. The capacity for word and face recognition between control subjects and people with hemispherectomies differed, but the differences were less than 10%, and the average accuracy exceeded 80%. In direct comparisons between matching hemispheres in patients and controls, patients' accuracy on both face and word recognition was comparable regardless of the hemisphere removed.

"Reassuringly, losing half of the brain does not equate to losing half of its functionality," said first author Michael Granovetter, Ph.D., a student in the Medical Scientist Training Program at Pitt's School of Medicine. "While we can't definitively predict how any given child might be affected by a hemispherectomy, the performance that we see in these patients is encouraging. The more we can understand plasticity after surgery, the more information, and perhaps added comfort, we can provide to parents who are making difficult decisions about their child's treatment plan."

Additional authors of this paper are Sophia Robert, B.S., and Leah Ettensohn, B.S., both of Carnegie Mellon University.


Explore further

Adults who, as children, had half their brain removed still able to score well with face and word recognition

More information: Michael C. Granovetter et al, With childhood hemispherectomy, one hemisphere can support—but is suboptimal for—word and face recognition, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2212936119
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-10-word-recognition-adequately-brain.html

Some breast cancer patients with high responses to chemotherapy may not need surgery

 Patients with early-stage breast cancer who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be able to skip surgery and receive standard radiation treatment with a low chance of disease recurrence, according to a new study from researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

The Phase II trial results, published today in Lancet Oncology, evaluated the likelihood of breast cancer returning in patients who are in complete remission after receiving chemotherapy and radiation without surgery. Each of the 31 patients followed had a complete response to chemotherapy and none had a breast tumor recurrence after a median follow-up of 26.4 months.

"The ultimate form of breast-conserving therapy is completely eliminating breast surgery for invasive disease," said principal investigator Henry Kuerer, M.D., Ph.D., professor of Breast Surgical Oncology. "This research adds to growing evidence showing that newer drugs can completely eradicate cancer in some cases, and very early results show we can safely eliminate surgery in this select group of women with breast cancer."

This is the first modern prospective trial of surgery omission in patients with  who respond favorably to chemotherapy. High responses are indicated by state-of-the-art breast imaging-guided, vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB). These results build on Kuerer's previous research using an MD Anderson-developed biopsy protocol to accurately identify patients achieving a pCR after chemotherapy. Those patients, known as "exceptional responders," are at a lower risk of breast cancer recurrence and are candidates for avoiding breast surgery.

Improved chemotherapy agents have increased pCR rates significantly, and patients with triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer now are achieving a pCR in 60% to 80% of cases. Combining these high response rates with selective image-guided VACB and stringent histologic processing has improved physicians' ability to determine which patients may not need surgery.

The multicenter trial enrolled 50 women older than 40 with early stage triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer and a residual breast lesion less than 2 centimeters as determined by imaging after standard chemotherapy treatment. Patients had one image-guided VACB. If no disease was identified on biopsy, breast surgery was omitted, and patients proceeded to standard whole-breast radiotherapy.

The mean age of participants was 60.4 years; 21 patients had  and 29 had HER2-positive breast cancer. Thirty-eight participants were white, 10 were Black and 2 were other ethnicities/races. The VACB identified a pCR in 31 patients. No serious biopsy-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred.

"For the time being, standard breast cancer surgery is still necessary," Kuerer said. "While these results are remarkable and quite promising, it's important for patients to know this is the very beginning of a new type of treatment for select patients. Much longer follow-up and further studies will be necessary before this approach can be integrated into routine breast cancer care."

The investigators will continue to follow trial participants for long-term outcomes. As a secondary aim of the study, the researchers also are measuring minimal residual disease from liquid biopsies to determine if they correlate with pCR.

Although this was a small, non-randomized study, it shows the feasibility of this approach. A larger randomized study is needed to directly compare the treatments before any changes to standard of care are considered.


Explore further

Can physical exercise enhance the effect of chemotherapy against breast cancer?

More information: Lancet Oncology (2022). www.thelancet.com/journals/lan … (22)00613-1/fulltext
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-10-breast-cancer-patients-high-responses.html

Outpatient Centers Cautiously Open Doors to Surgery for People With Cardiac Devices

 As more medically complex patients are caught in the migration of surgeries to ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), these freestanding facilities face rising pressure to take people with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). It remains controversial the question of whether more ASCs should adapt to accommodate this feared patient group.

Skeptics cite safety concerns of outpatient surgery -- even relatively simple hip, gastrointestinal procedures -- for CIED patients. With the elevated risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and challenging perioperative care for these patients at risk of sudden cardiac death, it may be too challenging a scenario for an ASC with limited resources.

In contemporary practice, however, these fears are unfounded, according to ambulatory anesthesia specialist Girish Joshi, MD, of UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health and Hospital Systems in Dallas.

He said it's no longer acceptable for ASCs to flat-out reject all patients with pacemakers and other CIEDs. "Obviously there has to be a common sense approach," he said during a debate at the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) annual meeting.

Joshi's debate opponent at ASA, Victor Davila, MD, an anesthesia and critical care physician at Ohio State University in Columbus, said he agreed there should be no blanket rule that a CIED patient can or cannot undergo an operation at an ASC.

Nevertheless, Davila emphasized that ASCs considering taking these patients should not fall into the trap of thinking it's always safe.

Joshi said that ASCs can be safe for people with CIEDs with the right patient selection by gate-keeping anesthesiologists. He stressed consideration of the indication for the CIED, which may include sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular block after an acute myocardial infarction, and advanced heart failure.

Those decidedly not suitable for surgery at the ASC include people with recent CIED implantation and heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fractions 35% or under on cardiac resynchronization therapy, Joshi acknowledged.

For CIED patients who may be suitable, he reassured that intraoperative complications won't occur with the right preparation: the ASC anesthesiologist should get details about the patient, procedure, and device prior to the day of the surgery, and take steps to reduce electromagnetic interference during the procedure.

Even if it is determined that ICD reprogramming is required beforehand, this can be done remotely for some newer devices by an expert outside the ASC, he said.

It still doesn't beat the ease of reprogramming in the hospital, Davila argued. "If you're inpatient, the cardiologists are there, the device guys are walking around. But if you're an ASC, there's no interest in anybody keeping you happy," he complained. "Right now I call the cardiologist, he says 'Don't worry about it.' I call the device guy, he says 'Don't worry about it, just go.'"

For those at ASCs, if "cardiologists are washing their hands of you" because newer, better-designed CIEDs are making it safer for patients to undergo surgery, one way to interpret this is that you are on your own if you take these patients, Davila said.

That means anesthesiologists will have to get familiar with the particulars of each device, learning, for instance, how each behaves with magnets. Facilities should have temporary pacing and defibrillation equipment on hand and regularly checked; and staff should be trained in emergency use of this equipment.

"It is reasonable and possible to care for CIED patients in a freestanding ASC," Davila said."Caring for these patients safely likely requires a significant infrastructure, a large amount of collaboration with the surgeon, or both, and these collaborations are not typically available," he warned.

"While this infrastructure may make sense in some contexts, many ASCs will likely find it is more trouble than it is worth," he said. "Not all freestanding ASCs are equal. Not everybody has the same resources available to them. Many are already on budget constraints."

ASA session moderator Niraja Rajan, MD, medical director of Hershey Outpatient Surgery Center in Pennsylvania, commented that she is seeing a lot of patients with low ejection fraction and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for ambulatory surgery at her center. A lot of these surgeries are urology procedures, she noted, and some cannot be done at the main hospital. There have been "no problems" so far, she said.

Ultimately, Davila said that people with CIEDs should not be excluded from the benefits of ambulatory surgery, which include greater patient satisfaction and better value compared with hospitals. By avoiding the hospital environment, patients may experience less infection, fasting, sleep disturbance, and other problems associated with being inpatient.

Therefore, ready or not, outpatient centers can expect more medically complex patients to be knocking on their doors.

"In the next 5 to 10 years, I would expect [CIED patients] to be coming very regularly to your ASC," Davila said.


Disclosures

Another CKD-Related Anemia Drug Goes Under the Microscope of FDA Advisors

 An FDA advisory panel will weigh in on whether the safety signals of daprodustat in chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anemia are too risky to recommend the oral agent for approval.

On Wednesday, the FDA's Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee will review the evidence and vote on whether the investigational agent's benefits for CKD-related anemia in patients both on or off dialysis outweigh its risks, which range from gastric erosions or hemorrhage to acute kidney injury and heart failure.

There's no question there is an unmet need for these patients. Standard treatment options consist of iron, red blood cell transfusions, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). But ESAs carry boxed warnings for increased mortality and serious cardiovascular and thromboembolic events like stroke and myocardial infarction.

According to FDA briefing documents released ahead of the meeting, about 8% of patients with stage 4 CKD and 13% of those with stage 5 CKD are treated with an ESA, as are 12% to 17% of patients with pre-end-stage renal disease.

Daprodustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) from developer GSK, and was tested for non-inferiority against intravenous or subcutaneous ESAs in the phase III ASCEND clinical program. These agents work by inhibiting the oxygen pathway, stimulating endogenous erythropoietin production and thus raising hemoglobin levels. While several HIF-PHI drugs have been developed, none have received approval from the FDA. Roxadustat was the first agent in this class to be sent to the FDA for review, but was ultimately turned down by this same advisory panel in July 2021 due to concerns about thrombotic risk.

"The efficacy of daprodustat to raise hemoglobin is not in question," the FDA wrote in its briefing documents.

In the ASCEND program, participants with CKD undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis had a mean change in hemoglobin level of 0.28±0.02 g/dL from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 with daprodustat -- showing a 0.18 g/dL improvement compared with ESA treatment. As for patients with CKD not on dialysis, the average change in hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.74±0.02 g/dL in the daprodustat group and 0.66±0.02 g/dL in the darbepoetin alfa group.

"Daprodustat is the first agent within the HIF-PHI class to demonstrate clear and consistent efficacy in achieving and maintaining hemoglobin levels," Ajay Singh, MBBS, MBA, of Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and ASCEND clinical program chair, previously told MedPage Today.

Safety of daprodustat is slated to be the main point of discussion among panel members, with questions from the agency geared toward cardiovascular harm, gastric erosions and hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury.

With regard to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the agency said daprodustat did not "unacceptably increase the risk" in the dialysis-dependent population. But FDA noted that some analyses found elevated hazard ratios for MACE in the non-dialysis population, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolic disease, and vascular access thrombosis.

"Because ESAs such as darbepoetin alfa already carry some of these risks, a further increase in these risks beyond that seen with the ESAs is concerning," FDA staff noted.

In subanalyses of the non-dialysis trial involving U.S. patients, significantly higher risks with daprodustat were seen for cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.12), hospitalization for heart failure (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50), and thromboembolic events (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.06-3.87) as well.

"The elevated risks in the U.S. subgroup across multiple cardiovascular endpoints is noteworthy because daprodustat would be used in the U.S. if FDA approved," the agency noted.

A higher number of serious gastric/esophageal erosions with the drug was similarly isolated to the non-dialysis-dependent group (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17-2.27), and "the risk appears to accumulate constantly over time," the FDA noted, adding that most of these events were "overt gastrointestinal bleeding," with more than half requiring transfusions.

FDA staff also warned of a possible increased risk for serious acute kidney injury in the non-dialysis population (relative risk 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.00), but added that this risk was attenuated when considering all acute kidney injury adverse events regardless of severity.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/nephrology/anemia/101408

Why I Voted 'Yes' on the New ALS Drug -- Twice

 Recordings of both the first (March 30, 2022) and second (September 7, 2022) meetings of the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Advisory Committee to discuss AMX0035 for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remain on the FDA's website. Each is several hours long. Accordingly, I will not elaborate on all the comments I made as a patient representative during these two public meetings.

In summary, and despite the imperfect analysis of data obtained from the phase II CENTAUR trial on which the application for FDA approval of the drug was based, I found the available evidence of AMX0035's effectiveness sufficient to call for "yes" votes both times.

In the second meeting, but not the first, the advisory committee was asked to consider not only the safety and efficacy evidence presented, but also the unmet need in ALS, the status of the ongoing phase III trial, and the seriousness of ALS.

During this second public meeting, I commented that our system of corporate medicine is driven by regulated competition and, of course, profit.

I expressed further my belief that if AMX0035 (now marketed in the U.S. as Relyvrio) doesn't work as advertised, the medication will not gain market acceptance, persons with ALS ("PALS") will stop taking it, and the FDA will have grounds to honor Amylyx's very public promise to take the Relyvrio off the market and withdraw approval.

None of this will be clear for a couple of years: we must wait until the results from the PHOENIX phase III trial are available, and until PALS not enrolled in this larger trial have been taking the medication for some time.

No single member of an advisory committee has an individual voice. Our deliberations and votes are held in full public view, and once we make a recommendation to the FDA, the committee's work is done. In this case, the committee recommended with a 7-2 vote that the FDA approve AMX0035.

So, you may be wondering how I ended up on the panel and what exactly led to my "yes" votes.

My interest in serving as a patient representative on this committee began when I was contacted by the FDA early in 2022. Until then, I knew nothing about this part of the new drug approval process.

Following at least one interview, completion of a screening questionnaire, and completion of 17 (yes, 17) federal government forms, I was appointed to a 4-year term as a special government employee, with no guarantee of any regular work (there is a delightful irony in the 4-year appointment term, given the predicted survival times of persons with ALS).

Obviously, it turned out there would be some work, beginning with the March 30 meeting, and then the September 7 meeting. I am compensated for the time spent attending public meetings, but not for preparation time.

It is important, in the context of considering new drug applications, that the FDA receive formal input from persons who have the condition that a new drug is intended to address. I am lucky in that my particular flavor of ALS (and there are many different presentations) presented in my lower leg and seems to have progressed slowly.

I no longer walk, and my energy reserve is lower than before. But I can talk, read, spot snake oil when it's being sold, and use a computer keyboard. Any intellect and cognition I might once have had is mostly unaffected by this disease. This is one of its crueler aspects -- being fully aware of one's diminishing physical abilities.

My amazing wife is my caregiver, and her expectations for life have changed at least as much as mine (caregivers of PALS are often called CALS). In fact, I believe this disease is often harder on loved ones who give care than it is on PALS.

My own diagnosis (sporadic limb onset ALS) came as a complete shock in October 2019, less than 6 weeks after my retirement from full-time employment. This was also one week before my wife and I were scheduled to complete our long-planned move from the west to our retirement house on Maine's coast. We were looking forward to a grand adventure, having bought the house 9 months earlier and filling it with most of our earthly possessions. Prior to my diagnosis, there were no thoughts or suspicions that a slightly weak left ankle would turn out to be an early sign of ALS.

We enjoyed nearly 2 years in Maine before returning to the west. Family, a deep bench of friends, and familiar territory were called for, since my declining physical abilities were and are shifting huge burdens onto my wife's plate. She will need increasing support.

I'll add that CALS are frequently overlooked. All the sympathy goes to the PALS, but it is the loving family-member caregivers who carry the heavy load. Their lives are turned upside down, as are their finances.

Medications like AMX0035, riluzole (Rilutek), and edaravone (Radicava) that extend life for a few months, and possibly slow disease progression, may give some persons with ALS a little breathing room. There is great hope, some of it justified, that the growing amount of ALS research and development now underway may yield drug cocktails to address various forms of this disease in some. Time will tell.

Meanwhile, it is unquestioned that there is an enormous unmet need for ALS treatment, not to mention a cure. PALS are dying at a rapid clip, so investigational drugs that have been shown to do no harm and to be even somewhat effective should receive thoughtful consideration.

Finally, I don't know if I'll be taking AMX0035. Medicare Part D would have to be on board, my bargain-basement prescription drug coverage would have to schedule this medication in an affordable tier, or I'd need to find help in paying the steep $158,000 per year annual cost of the medication.

And, my wife and I will have to ponder the big question -- do the benefits of a marginally longer life and somewhat slower disease progression as measured by the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale justify this enormous cost?

Mark Weston is a part-time consulting real estate appraiser, educator, and formerly served as Colorado's first director of the Division of Conservation. He served as a patient representative on the FDA's advisory committee to discuss AMX0035 for the treatment of ALS.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/101418

Medicaid Won't Look the Same After the COVID Public Health Emergency Ends

 Getting the Medicaid program through the period after the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) ends -- a time when some Medicaid beneficiaries will lose their eligibility -- will not be easy, Medicaid officials from several states said Tuesday.

"This is not going to happen overnight," Amanda Cassel Kraft, Assistant Secretary for MassHealth at the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services, said at a webinar sponsored by the Kaiser Family Foundation. "States have about a year to initiate eligibility renewals, and we've got a whole lot of members to go through the process."

"Part of the balance that we're trying to strike is getting out the message far and wide, and as clearly and simply as we possibly can, about the process and the need for members to respond when they do receive renewals," she said. "But also understand that it's not as if all 2.3 million of our members are going to receive requests to renew their eligibility on day 1 of the end of the PHE and they're all going to be acting at the same time. This is going to be an extended process, and it's going to require an ongoing kind of attention and partnership with our providers, and our advocacy organizations, and our community organizations around the state to continue to reach out to members, and for folks to respond to that envelope when it does come, even if that is 7 months into the process."

Allison Taylor, Medicaid director for Indiana, noted that "One message that can be difficult is that when we do go through redetermination, there are folks that are going to be no longer eligible for coverage. And so balancing that [means] making sure there's a warm handoff and members are ready and have plans."

"There will be some appropriate, thoughtful disenrollment along the continuum," said Taylor, who is also president of the National Association of Medicaid Directors. "We want to do that very thorough eligibility process, but we also recognize that coverage will look different -- we will have lower levels of coverage on the back end, as would be expected."

Both Massachusetts and Indiana have seen big increases in enrollment during the pandemic, according to Kraft and Taylor. In Massachusetts, "pre-pandemic, we were at about 1.8 million members and currently we're at 2.3 million members," Kraft said. "So that's nearly a 30% increase as a result of the 'maintenance of effort' requirements during the public health emergency." The program covers about 40% of children in Massachusetts and about 60% of individuals with disabilities, she added.

In Indiana, "we've seen tremendous enrollment growth," said Taylor. "We typically had around 1.4 million Hoosiers in Medicaid; right now we're well over 2 million as the maintenance of effort continues." About 85% of the state's Medicaid program is run through managed care, she said.

The webinar was held in conjunction with the release of a Kaiser Family Foundation report, which noted that "nationwide, Medicaid provided health insurance coverage to about one in four Americans in 2020 and accounted for nearly one-sixth of all U.S. health care expenditures in 2020." The report also found that "total Medicaid/CHIP [Children's Health Insurance Program] enrollment grew to 89.4 million in June 2022, an increase of 18.2 million (25.6%) from February 2020, right before the pandemic, when enrollment began to steadily increase."

"When the PHE ends, states will begin processing redeterminations and millions of people could lose coverage if they are no longer eligible, or face administrative barriers despite remaining eligible," the report said. "Some unwinding of PHE emergency authorities is already completed or underway. The temporary 6.2 percentage-point increase in federal matching funds will expire at the end of the quarter in which the PHE ends."

https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/medicaid/101420