Search This Blog

Sunday, February 12, 2023

Retailers busting thieves with facial-recognition tech used at MSG

 James Dolan has lately stirred controversy over his use of facial-recognition technology to keep his enemies out of Madison Square Garden — but supermarkets and other retailers say they’ve begun using it for a legitimate purpose: to bust shoplifters.

Grocery stores, drug chains and other mass merchants are increasingly using high-tech innovations — including facial-recognition software, artificial intelligence and even aisle-roving robots — to clamp down on thieves. Some say they have turned up a few surprises.

Moe Issa, who owns four Brooklyn Fare stores in Manhattan and Brooklyn, said well-heeled customers with large diamond rings and Gucci bags are squirreling containers of blueberries into their purses — and said one serial offender turned out to be a mom.

“She took two organic chicken breasts and put it underneath her baby in a stroller,” Issa told The Post. “She put it under her baby’s diaper. Who is going to say, ‘Lift your baby up’?”

Moe Issa holding up a Rib Eye steak in his store.
Beef, especially the Rib Eye at $22.77 is a common target of shoplifters Brooklyn Fare supermarket store owner, Moe Issa said.
Robert Miller for NY Post

Retailers who are losing thousands of dollars each week to brazen thieves are turning to new technology that can alert staff when their stuff is getting pinched. While Dolan came under fire for using it to prevent his legal enemies from attending sporting events or seeing the Rockettes, retailers say their business is at stake — particularly in New York City where lax law enforcement has helped spur a shoplifting epidemic.

On Friday, an analysis of police data by The Post showed that retail thefts hit record levels for the second year in a row in 2022. Shoplifting complaints surged to more than 63,000 last year — a 45% jump over the roughly 45,0000 reported in 2021 and a nearly 275% jump compared to the mid-2000s, the statistics show.

A security camera above the meat dislpay.
Cameras like this are placed in strategic locations where popular items are displayed.
Robert Miller for NY Post

One Bronx-based grocer who has been battling crime in his stores installed facial recognition software in one location within the past month – and says it can identify known thieves even when they try to obscure themselves with face masks and hoodies, he said.

“We have been building a file of repeat offenders and it’s incredibly efficient,” the grocer said.

Nevertheless, the grocer did not want to be identified, saying he’s concerned that facial recognition software will soon be restricted in New York as it has been in about two dozen states and cities in the US.

Big chain stores, meanwhile, are wary of exposing employees and customers to potentially violent or aggressive perpetrators. Walgreens instructs its security guards not confront thieves, as The Post previously reported. The guards are “not there to protect the product,” Joseph Stein, director of asset protection solutions for Walgreens, said at an “Anti-Crime Summit” in January.

Instead, goods at big drug chains increasingly are getting locked up, requiring customers to request assistance when buying everything from aspirin to shampoo.

James Dolan has gotten heat for his use of facial recognition technology at MSG.
James Dolan has gotten heat for his use of facial recognition technology at MSG.
Robert Sabo for the NY POST

As an alternative, Knightscope of Moutainview, Calif. Is peddling 4.5-foot, 400-pound robots that are equipped with cameras and can patrol store aisles or be stationed where “highly sought after items are stocked,” said spokesperson Stacy Stephens.

“The No. 1 thing is deterrence because we know that having a robot in place with security markings gets people’s attention,” he said.

Stephens would not disclose Knightscope’s retail clients, but said the robots have been deployed in shopping malls and parking lots. They rent for about 75 cents an hour and allow security personnel to open communication with a potential troublemaker.

A security staffer might talk through the robot to say, “Hey you — in the blue shirt, what are doing by the trash dumpster? This is a restricted area,” according to Stephens.

A display of Tide detergent.
Some security software rely on artificial intelligence and can pick up if a thief is taking too many of one item too quickly.
Robert Miller for NY Post

Paris-based artificial-intelligence company Veesion boasts US-based customers including ACE Hardware, Keyfood and independent liquor stores. Its systems can flag thieves when they stash goods in their clothing or in a bag, or even start drinking and eating stuff off the shelves.

Using a store’s security cameras, the software — which costs between $200 and $800 a month, depending on the size of the store — can promptly send a seven-second GIF to employees’ phones showing the thief in action.

“It took us two years to get to the point where the software can recognize the gestures and the movements of the clients inside the store,” Sean Ward, Veesion’s US manager.

Still, many say technology will only go so far to address the shoplifting epidemic. Even tech executives concede the limitations of their products. 

“It’s up to the staff to take action and do something,” says Scott Mullins, founder of Irvine, Calif.-based Raptor Vision, an AI software provider that serves some Kroger and Albertsons supermarkets as well as wine stores.

Spam containers locked up.
Retailers have been forced to lock up everything from toothpaste to spam.
William C. Lopez/NYPOST

Launched in June, Raptor detects suspicious behavior using a store’s security camera system, for example flagging customers who grab unusual quantities of a single product, Mullins said. The patented software alerts staff via text messages or emails within seconds. 

“They have to touch the product more times than normal,” to trigger a notification, Mullins said, adding that Raptor can also activate a speaker in the aisle that can be programmed to say among other things “customer service is on its way immediately to help you.”

Westside Market agreed to test Raptor in one of its seven Manhattan stores in the next couple of weeks, the upscale grocer’s chief operating officer Ian Joskowitz told The Post.

“Raptor is perfect for a certain type of shoplifter who comes in and steals 20 steaks or 15 Haagen Dazs pints,” Joskowitz said, adding that he expects to lay out about $2,500 for the software plus a nominal monthly fee.

Westside also just hired an imposing security guard who is a mixed martial arts expert to accompany the staff at the West End location when they confront someone who is stealing from the store. The security guard wears a bulletproof vest.

“I had a woman try to stab me with a hypordermic needle,” Joskowitz said.

NYPD officers arresting a  shoplifter.
NYPD officers arrest a serial shoplifter at a CVS store.
William Farrington for NY Post

Not everyone, however, is embracing the new technology. Industry executives note that supermarketsin particular carry razor-thin margins, making big investments in software a tough call.

“We just had our worst year, so there is no room to make speculative investments on technology,” said Sal Bonavita, who owns two KeyFood stores in the Bronx. “The best defense we have is our employees who know when someone has tried to steal from us.”

https://nypost.com/2023/02/12/retailers-busting-thieves-with-facial-recognition-tech-used-at-msg/

GOP’s new biz probes may burst balloony Joe Biden’s bubble

 With China’s spy balloon crossing the American heartland unmolested and GOP leaders simultaneously starting probes of his family’s corruption, Joe Biden is entering a new phase of his presidency. The worst case scenario is that all his chickens are coming home to roost. 

The spy balloon’s appearance and that of two additional objects shot down by the military oddly highlight the importance of the House probes. The possibility that Biden has been compromised by profiting from son Hunter’s lucrative foreign entanglements, especially with China, is drawing extra attention to how the president reacts to the Communist regime’s aggressive surveillance. 

So far, his weak-tea response is raising even more suspicions. In fact, it’s fair to say he has done or said nothing that would allay concerns and everything to aggravate them. 

It started with his administration’s bizarre radio silence as the balloon crossed over Alaska and entered mainland airspace. Only after a civilian spotted it over Montana did the White House acknowledge what it knew all along. 

A US fighter jet shot down a Chinese spy balloon over the Atlantic Ocean last week.
A US fighter jet shot down a Chinese spy balloon over the Atlantic Ocean last week.
Chad Fish/AP

Later it emerged the president and his team played hush-hush because they didn’t want a dispute with China to get in the way of a planned visit there by Secretary of State Tony Blinken. 

File that one under appeasement. The visit was canceled only out of embarrassment, but it’s not clear if Blinken planned to condemn the balloon or simply pretend it didn’t happen. My bet is on the latter. 

Who’s in charge here? 

Joe Biden
Biden seemed to take credit for taking down the balloon after four days of inaction as the balloon made its way across the country.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Worse, even after the White House acknowledged the balloon, officials allowed it to mosey eastward for four more days, no doubt sucking up vital information, before the Air Force finally shot it down off the coast of South Carolina on Saturday, Feb. 4. It was then that Biden took credit for giving the shoot-down order the previous Wednesday, but said the military decided to wait until it was over water to avoid civilian ground casualties. 

Who’s in charge here? And what did China gain by that four-day delay? 

It’s also instructive that among the White House’s first lines of defense was a claim from an anonymous source to favored media that similar balloons surveilled America during the Trump years. When the former president and top officials in his White House insisted the claim was false, the Pentagon “clarified” that objects it previously marked as unidentified were now deemed to be balloons. 

The lack of clarity — and honesty — led to expectations Biden would give the incident extended attention in last last Tuesday’s State of the Union speech. Some analysts predicted he would focus on it early as a sign of strength and aim to create a bipartisan show of unity. 

Instead, he waited until late in the evening and then, without mentioning the balloon directly, declared that “if China threatens our sovereignty, we will act to protect our country. And we did.” 

Really? Is it protecting America’s sovereignty to allow an adversary a full week of unhindered spying? It’s safe to say China will not return the favor. 

Two days later, in an interview with Telemundo, Biden took a new approach, insisting the incident was “not a major breach.” 

Huh? Even top Democrats are not buying that view as they join Republicans in demanding more information. 

Meanwhile, the GOP probes into the Biden family business are directly aimed at the “big guy.” Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, head of the Oversight panel, repeated his vow to investigate the president’s role and whether it “occurred at the expense of American interests.” 

Biden's corvette, garage
Classified documents were found in Biden’s Delaware home.
Joe Biden

Comer, in a Post op-ed, also drew a possible connection to the growing pile of classified documents turning up in Biden’s homes and offices, asking: “Did foreign business partners, through Hunter Biden, have access to these improperly stored documents?” 

His demand that Hunter turn over records about the foreign deals was swiftly rejected by Hunter’s legal team. Absent a settlement, expect a subpoena followed by a long court fight. 

For his part, the president professed not to be worried about the probes. 

The media narrative 

In an interview with PBS anchor Judy Woodruff, he said “The public is not going to pay attention to that.” 

He added that the country wants the GOP House to act on public problems but “If the only thing they can do is make up things about my family, it’s not going to go very far.” 

My first reaction was amazement that he was baiting the bear by accusing the GOP of spinning tall tales when there is so much compelling evidence the president was in on the schemes. 

Hunter Biden
Questionable images and information was discovered on a laptop in 2020 deemed to be Hunter Biden’s.
The Washington Free Beacon

On second thought, I realized Biden’s answer wasn’t so much a challenge to Comer as it was a statement of faith that Big Media and Big Tech would shield him again, just as they did when The Post broke the laptop story in 2020. Woodruff’s softball approach on PBS was typical. 

Instead of asking smart questions about the evidence that implicates the president, she briefly summarized the probes as being about “access” before asking, “How do you plan to deal with that?” 

That’s a lap dog at work. Unfortunately, she’s like the vast bulk of the Washington press corps. Consumed with “optics” and how something “plays,” their questions often make them sound like amateur campaign advisers. 

Consider that even though they belatedly admitted Hunter’s laptop is authentic, The New York Times, Washington Post and others have not taken the logical next step of pursuing the numerous exchanges mentioning the president. 

Nor has there been much media interest in following up with Tony Bobulinski, the ex-family partner who first exposed Joe as the secret “big guy” in a China deal. 

Rather, on the rare occasions when they even refer vaguely to any evidence, Woodruff types inevitably downgrade them as Republican charges. That way, they slyly echo Dems’ talking points that the allegations are just crazy conspiracy theories that prove the GOP can’t be trusted with power. 

The result is that Comer, Rep. Jim Jordan and other GOP inquisitors will have to break through the Praetorian Guard to get the public’s attention. It can be done if they find enough evidence, but polls show it won’t be easy. 

Many in US tuned out 

Hunter and Joe Biden
Both Hunter and Joe Biden are under investigation.
Teresa Kroeger

While 72% of all respondents told Fox News last December it is important to investigate Hunter’s foreign businesses, only 39% think he committed a crime and 31% say he did something unethical but not illegal. 

The results are similar for Joe Biden: 35% believe he committed a crime, with 27% thinking he acted unethically but not illegally. 

However, among Democrats only, the numbers are much more lopsided. Just 11% believe Hunter did something illegal, and only 8% believe Joe did, Fox reported. 

Those numbers take on an added dimension when you remember that most people who work in media and tech companies are committed Democrats. Their duel affiliation is no secret to the White House, which helps explain the president’s confidence he and his family will beat the rap.

https://nypost.com/2023/02/11/gops-new-biz-probes-may-burst-baloony-joe-bidens-bubble/