Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

Stefanik calls on Haley, DeSantis to drop out and back Trump

 Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) called on Trump’s primary rivals to drop out of the race and endorse the former president, arguing that nobody has a shot at beating him, and that unity could ensure a 2024 defeat for President Biden.

“I am calling on every other candidate — all of whom have no chance to win — to drop out so we can unify and immediately rally behind President Trump,” she said Monday on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. 

The sentiment comes after Trump swept Iowa, taking about 51 percent of the vote in the first primary of the 2024 election cycle. Rival candidate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis took 21 percent of the vote, while former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley took 19 percent.

Biotechnology entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy and former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson dropped out of the GOP race following Monday’s results.

Stefanik’s demands go one step further than a Tuesday suggestion from The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board, which proposed DeSantis leave the race in order to give Haley a real chance against Trump, one-on-one.

“Mr. DeSantis faces no clear path to the nomination. He’s well behind Ms. Haley in New Hampshire and South Carolina,” the editorial board wrote Tuesday. “If he believes, as he says, that Mr. Trump can’t win in November, he should leave the race and give Ms. Haley a chance to take on Mr. Trump one on one.”

Both Haley and DeSantis have offered themselves as superior Trump alternatives, often painting Trump as good in his day, but not what the country needs going forward. 

Haley has performed well in New Hampshire polling, with the next GOP primary vote set for Jan. 23. In the Granite State, she trails Trump by about 8 percentage points, according to polling averages from The Hill/Decision Desk HQ. In national polls, Haley and DeSantis are neck and neck, but still trail Trump by a large margin.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4412346-stefanik-tells-haley-desantis-drop-out-back-trump/

Hospital Forces Family Not to Talk About COVID Ordeal

 A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) an Ohio hospital insisted a COVID-19 patient’s husband and daughters sign before she could be given the drug ivermectin was ruled invalid by Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Carl A. Aveni, on October 6.

After returning to Ohio from a family trip, Brenda Downs, 64, contracted COVID-19, and within days deteriorated to the point she was admitted to OhioHealth in Columbus. Despite a federally recommended treatment that included remdesivir, Downs’ condition worsened. On the same day she was put on a ventilator, her family requested doctors at OhioHealth administer ivermectin, an anti-malarial drug that had shown some success in combatting COVID-19.

The hospital initially refused, saying ivermectin had not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use against COVID-19. The family sued the hospital to administer the drug or allow an outside physician to do so.

$100,000 Penalty NDA

OhioHealth relented, but only after insisting the hospital and the Downs family conclude an NDA. That agreement, a copy of which was obtained by Health Care News, states:

“Mr. Downs has been fully apprised and informed of OhioHealth’s position that the administration of Ivermectin to Mrs. Downs in these circumstances is unlikely to provide her with a medical benefit, is an off-label use not approved for emergency or other use and that he voluntarily consents to proceed with the treatment described in Paragraph 1 as a compassionate use, with full knowledge of OhioHealth’s position; and

“Mr. Downs has voluntarily agreed to proceed with the treatment described in paragraph 1 because he believes, based on his independent research, that it has the realistic probability of benefit equal to or greater than standard care and that the risks of using such treatment are reasonable compared to the risks associated with not proceeding with the same.”

The NDA states that “upon proof by OhioHealth of such breach, OhioHealth shall be entitled to recover liquidated damages, without proof of actual damages, in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) from the Downs’ Releasors, who shall be jointly and severally liable for the same, except that the Downs lawyers and law firms shall not have liability unless that lawyer or that law firm is proven to be the violator.”

Under pressure from the hospital and desperate to save Downs’ life, the family signed the confidentiality agreement on August 18, 2021. But Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Mark Serrott insisted the NDA be signed by the family’s attorney, Ralph Lorigo, who refused. Even after Downs’ husband obtained a new attorney, the ivermectin was never administered. Downs died on September 2, 2021.

Dueling Lawsuits

Wanting to tell their story without each member being held liable for the $100,000 fine, on October 22, 2022, the Downs family asked the Franklin County court to declare the agreement void, arguing, among other things, the hospital never intended to administer the ivermectin or allow it to be given by a third party, and that it was signed under duress. OhioHealth countersued, saying the suit was frivolous, and demanded the family be held responsible for the hospital’s legal fees.

Cara Bookman, one of Downs’ daughters who signed the confidentiality agreement, said in an email to Health Care News, “We did not sue for malpractice or wrongful death and our current case was filed under seal.”

“The reason we did not seek an against medical advice discharge of my mother was due to her unstable condition,” said Bookman. “The doctors told us she would most likely die in transport, and we agreed with that assessment at the time.”

As for the hospital not administering ivermectin, Bookman said, “Someone from OhioHealth lied to the judge and told him my mother was doing significantly better, and due to this lie, the judge did not force the hospital to uphold their agreement.”

Why Secrecy?

“The hospital’s behavior is both outrageous and hard to believe,” said Jane Orient, M.D., executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. “An NDA with a $100,000 fine might be appropriate to protect against disclosure of proprietary information, causing financial loss.

“But what is the hospital afraid of?” asked Orient. “That people might find out that an outside physician saved the life of a patient they refused to help? That they allowed an ‘off-label’ use of a long-approved drug—which is routine and extremely common in almost all other circumstances? That a dying patient went on to die after getting ivermectin instead of not getting it? That a family had to sue them to get a drug billions of people have received, often over the counter? That they are a dictatorial institution without regard for patients’ views or common compassion?”

Marilyn Singleton, M.D., J.D., a California-based physician, notes that the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in Apter et al. v. Department of Health & Human Services et al., centering on whether the FDA interferes with doctors’ ability to prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19, is instructive.

“The court criticized FDA’s ‘you are not a horse’ campaign and emphasized that the FDA is not a physician,” said Singleton. “Nor is the hospital. The patient and her physician had the right to try the ivermectin. This reeks of a power play rather than a patient safety concern. The lawsuit by the hospital is not only cruel, it telegraphs that the hospital was wrong in fighting the patient and now it is doubling down.”

Bonner Russell Cohen, Ph. D. (bcohen@nationalcenter.org) is a senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research.

https://heartlanddailynews.com/2023/12/familys-covid-19-ordeal-exposes-hospital-non-disclosure-agreements/

A new low from the pro-Hamas left: Screaming at child cancer patients

 By Monica Showalter

You can't make this stuff up.

Just as you think the pro-Hamas left has hit rock-bottom in its offensive protests, another bottom drops out.

Now they're targeting child cancer patients seeking treatment at Memorial Sloane-Kettering cancer center in New York City, harassing vulnerable, weak, patients as they enter the facility -- many nervous, sick, anxious, and all focused on their treatment -- bellowing "shame!" at them in enraged mobs as if the children had anything to do with with is going on in Gaza.


This follows their shutting down of highways, their defacing of U.S. historic monuments, their ripping of posters of hostages from walls and their disruption of Norman Rockwell-like town hall meetings in small towns in Texas. Everything they do seems designed to repel, rather than draw public support to their cause, which, when you think about it is all about defending rapists, child killers, torturers, hostage-takers and killers. 

Now they're harassing child cancer patients, screaming 'shame' at them as they try to get into the building or look down from their hospital windows?

Unbelievable.

Who thinks this stuff up?

The wild-eyed fanatic apparently organizing this crap is one Nerdeen Kiswani:

 

So since patients are dying in hospitals in Gaza because Hamas hid its weapons there with hospital staff collaborating, patients should die in terror over here, too? That sounds-like the kill-them-all logic of Hamas.

And since some billionaire who donated to the hospital said he didn't want to hire pro-Hamas protestors, they're now targeting the patients at the hospital? The cowards could protest the billionaire and insist he hire them but why not bully a child with cancer instead?

"Another complicit institution!" the fat one bellowed in the video. "Make sure they hear you!" she yelled. "Shame on you!" she screamed and pointed, as little kids looking down from their hospital windows.

This is such a vile, dirty group. Do they sit in a room together each week and brainstorm how to make themselves even more offensive?

They shouldn't be allowed within 1,000 feet of any hospital or any other building with vulnerable people. Like the Westboro Baptist Church protestors, who disrupted funerals of grieving families of slain troops to protest something or other and drew some restrictions, the targets of these protests have rights, too -- the right to a dignified private funeral, the right to cancer treatment on schedule, unimpeded, and without pro-Hamas radicals screaming in their ears. 

Where are the zoning regulators to put a stop to these kinds of baying protests? Why aren't city officials putting the children's health and capacity to get to their hospital appointments without being harassed by screaming mobs of robotic lowlife their number one priority?

It's incredible what they are getting away with, and the more they get away with, the more they try. What a nasty group they are . The bright spot is that the more the public sees of them, the more they support Israel. Nobody likes a cause that champions terrorist scum.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/01/a_new_low_from_the_prohamas_left_screaming_at_child_cancer_patients_at_a_hospital_for_treatment_in_new_york.html

The Immigration Speech Donald Trump Needs to Deliver

 When newly announced candidate Donald Trump rode down the escalator at Trump Tower in June 2015, he famously promised to, “Build the wall and make Mexico pay for it.”

He certainly tried to build a wall on our southern border but unfortunately was thwarted by then House Speaker Paul Ryan and congressional Never-Trump Republicans who blocked funding for the wall. Ironically many of these same Republicans are happy spending hundreds of billions of dollars securing Ukraine’s, Israel’s, and other countries borders but not our own.

When President Biden assumed office, he stopped border wall construction, paused deportations, and basically opened our southern border to anyone from anywhere in the world regardless of their background, health status, financial resources, criminality, and intentions toward America.

We are adding a migrant population to America the size of Los Angeles each and every year, most of whom do not speak English, are illiterate, unemployable, and dependent on the government and thereby taxpayers for food, shelter, education, travel, health care, and clothing.

It has become obvious that this is an invasion.

Even Elon Musk accurately noted, “At this point there is no question that this administration is actively facilitating illegal immigration.”

Trump is certainly speaking out. “Now we have wars in Ukraine, Israel, and Yemen, but no ‘war’ on our Southern Border. Oh, that makes a lot of sense. Crooked Joe Biden is the worst President in the history of the United States!”

He should go further and give the following speech at one of his huge rallies or at the summer nominating convention.

Here’s my speech suggestion:

My fellow Americans, the majority of you believe that our current immigration system is way beyond broken and that in fact our open southern border is an invasion of America.

Excluding the days of COVID, we now have one of the lowest labor participation rates in decades meaning that many of you who want to or need to work are unable to. Illegal migrants working under the table are undercutting the wages and job prospects for many lower income and middle class Americans.

When I am back in the White House America, will only welcome foreigners who will contribute to American society, helping to making America great again. They must have the necessary financial resources to support themselves and their families. They will not be admitted to the U.S. if they are detrimental to our economic or national interests.

Criminals will not be allowed to migrate to the U.S. Any migrants who were not good citizens or who broke laws in their home country will not be admitted into America. They must also be physically and mentally healthy before entering our country.

A national registry will keep track of all migrants, with foreign tourists and immigrants assigned a unique tracking number similar to our social security numbers. Foreigners with false immigration documents will be fined or imprisoned, as will any foreigner falsifying their signature on a government document.

Any foreigner who is deported and re-enters the U.S. without authorization may be imprisoned for up to 10 years. Foreigners working in the U.S. without a proper work permit can also be imprisoned. Transportation companies bringing undocumented foreigners into the U.S. will be fined.

Non-U.S. citizens will be prohibited from participating in American political life, including protests and demonstrations and any public expression of political opinion. Foreigners may not own American land within 60 miles of a national land border or within 30 miles of the coastal border. To serve in the military, one must be American by birth. This also holds for captains, pilots, engineers, and mechanics.

Giving such a speech will give the left and GOP establishment the vapors. Trump will be accused or racism and xenophobia, with a dose of fascism thrown in for good measure, as predictable as sunrise and sunset.

In response, Trump can quote his predecessor Barack Obama citing the “strong foundation” between the U.S. and Mexico. And how, “Mexico is sharing expertise with neighbors across the Americas.”

Trump should then explain that Mexico’s own immigration law and constitution is the basis of his proposal, and in a spirit of cooperation and unity, America will borrow from her southern neighbor, implementing the same immigration laws in America as Mexico has carefully and thoughtfully implemented in its own country.

What are these laws? Start with property ownership.

Foreigners can own property in Mexico. It’s perfectly legal. Outside the restricted zones—50 kilometers (about 31 miles) from shorelines and 100 kilometers (about 62 miles) from international borders—foreigners can hold direct deed to property with the same rights and responsibilities as Mexican nationals.

Temporary residents to Mexico must, “Have a job offer issued by a Mexican employer, have an invitation from a private or public institution or have enough money to pay for your stay in the country.”

Who can serve in the military and similar jobs? According to Article 32 of Mexico’s constitution,

During peacetime, only Mexicans by birth can serve in the Army, in the Navy or in the Air Force as well can perform any employment or commission within such corporations.

The same condition applies to captains, pilots, skippers, ship engineers, flight engineers and, in general, to every crew member in a ship or an airplane carrying the Mexican flag. In the same way, only Mexicans by birth can be port harbormasters, steersmen and airport superintendents.

In America, Senator Dick Durbin wants illegal migrants serving in the U.S. military. Will they be loyal to the country they serve or their home country?

What about political protests, as in Cinco de Mayo day in the U.S.? Article 33 of Mexico’s constitution spells it out, “Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.”

How about deportations so that this horrible event doesn’t happen in Mexico as it commonly does in the U.S.?

In Colorado, “Illegal immigrant and four-time deportee kills mother and son in drunken driving crash.”

Mexico takes deportation seriously:

Evading deportation is a serious crime in Mexico. Illegal reentry into Mexico after deportation is punishable by 10 years’ imprisonment in a Mexican jail. Foreigners may be kicked out of the country without due process; that means without even being given a hearing. Mexico kicks out illegals without a deportation trial.

The point is that Mexico, as do many other countries, have much stricter immigration laws than the U.S., and they actually enforce their laws, unlike the U.S. Existing immigration laws are routinely ignored in favor of an open border free-for-all, admitting anyone who shows up at the southern border.

America provides no vetting for health status, criminal record, financial independence, or intention. Migrants are supported by U.S. taxpayers, without the consent of the American people or their elected representatives.

Neither party has any interest in fixing the problem, instead encouraging more of it, or coming up with nonsensical justification for unfettered immigration, like “climate change," as GOP primary candidate Nikki Haley pronounced.   

Candidate Trump could simply craft an immigration policy borrowing from our admired allies, for example Mexico, Australia, or New Zealand, and announce the same for America.

If progressives and woke Republicans are so eager to accept migrants from these countries, they should have no problem accepting their immigration laws.          

Brian C. Joondeph, M.D., is a physician and writer. Follow me on Twitter @retinaldoctor, Substack Dr. Brian’s Substack, Truth Social @BrianJoondeph, and LinkedIn @Brian Joondeph.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/01/the_immigration_speech_donald_trump_needs_to_deliver.html

Chicago Public Schools: Hundreds Of New Sexual Abuse Allegations Should Get All The Attention

 By Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner of Wirepoints

A glance at the news coverage of the recent Inspector General report on financial and sexual misconduct at Chicago Public Schools shows it’s the fiscal mismanagement that’s getting all the attention. The media is highlighting more than $23 million in missing laptops among other material fraud.

But it’s the more urgent issue of sexual abuse in CPS that should dominate the headlines. The IG reported a total of 446 sexual allegations made in 2023, ranging from misconduct and sexual harassment to nonsexual conduct that raises “the appearance of impropriety or possible grooming concerns.” That’s similar to 2022’s 470 allegations.

The IG also substantiated eight cases of adult-on-student sexual abuse.

Instances of abuse continue despite the Chicago Tribune’s exposure in 2018 of the school district’s sexual abuse crisis, when the newspaper found police had investigated more than 520 cases of juvenile sexual assault and abuse in Chicago’s public schools from 2008 to 2017.

Some things have improved since the publication, like the passage of Faith’s Law and the creation of the OIG’s Sexual Allegations Unit, but until CPS is subject to massive outside scrutiny and public outcry – much like the Catholic Church rightfully received for its own abuse scandals – count on cases of abuse to continue.

A lack of management and accountability

The problem at CPS is a lack of control and oversight, something the OIG office openly admits:

“Among cases closed by the agency’s general investigations unit from July 2022 through June 2023, Inspector General Will Fletcher said there’s a consistent theme: ‘Where you find vulnerabilities in management controls (and) exercising oversight — you will find fraud.’”

Those same vulnerabilities allow for continued instances of sexual abuse. 

What’s worse, sexual abuse is harder to detect than stolen laptops or missing funds. There’s nothing “missing” for a manager to notice. The prevalence of texting and video also makes abuse easier to perpetrate and harder to detect.

There are also likely many cases that go unreported and undiscovered due to shame or fear of retribution. That was certainly the case for the Catholic Church, which saw most accusations take years or decades to emerge.

And then there’s the CTU and its collective bargaining agreement. Their “myriad” and “tedious” rules are more about protecting the union and its members than they are about protecting children.

In sum, the deck is already stacked against parents and their children when it comes to abuse. The system’s continued mismanagement only makes things worse.

Needed reforms

The Chicago Tribune’s “Betrayed” series should have opened the door to massive changes and extreme transparency. It should have spurred the creation policies mirroring the Catholic Church’s own reforms, including:

  • A strict “one strike and you’re out” zero tolerance policy, as established in the Church’s Dallas Charter.

  • Removal of accused employees from school until an investigation is completed.

  • A public and easily accessible website that lists all offenders, their histories and their whereabouts, so these teachers don’t become tutors or get hired by another school system.

  • A rigorous screening process obsessed with a hiree’s character.

  • Robust and mandatory “safe environment” training for all employees and vendors.

And it should have spurred State Attorney General Kwame Raoul to open an investigation of his own. 

Instead, Raoul’s office dedicated itself to a multi-year reinvestigation of the Catholic Archdiocese, decades after the Church’s strict controls and safety processes had already been put in place.

Bureaucratic blocking

Not only has CPS failed to implement best practices for its own investigations, but its processes make it nearly impossible for private groups and citizens to conduct their own inquiries.

A report by KidsToo, a Chicago-based nonprofit dedicated to child protection, recently outlined its attempt at investigative reporting needed to get to the truth about the depths of sexual abuse at CPS.

It’s vital work because the OIG is always overwhelmed: “Every year, the OIG receives more credible allegations than it has the resources to investigate, so the investigations that are opened are the result of an assessment of the severity of the allegations and the potential impact or deterrent effect of investigating certain subject matter.”

Unsurprisingly, KidsToo’s efforts were often thwarted for a host of reasons, which they laid out in detail in their In Loco Parentis” report, including:

  • A FOIA process designed to “limit and filter information” rather than freely provide it.

  • Difficulty in gaining access to appropriate teacher data, including license information.

  • The teachers’ collective bargaining agreement allows CTU representatives to be part of the investigative process, creating a “myriad of steps” and “tedious” processes.

  • Other contract rules, including “grievance” and “mediation” processes, create even more investigative delays.

  • The revocation or suspension of teaching licenses is hampered by the State Superintendent having ultimate control over the process.

To be clear, these investigations involve serious allegations and so should be treated seriously, but the process should not be so labyrinthine for those trying to gather information.

*  *  *

That CPS is such a poor steward of taxpayer dollars is bad enough, but the failure to catch fraud and theft pales in comparison to the continual harm done to Chicago’s children. Not only are a vast number pushed out of the system without the basic skills they need to succeed in life, but some also end up victims of sexual abuse.

It’s a sad reminder of how inept, corrupt and morally bankrupt CPS really is.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/chicago-public-schools-hundreds-new-sexual-abuse-allegations-should-get-all-attention

US To Relist Yemen's Houthis As Designated Global Terrorists After Biden Removed

 It's about time? Late in the day Tuesday the Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Biden administration is belatedly moving to put Yemen's Houthi rebels back on the terrorist list.

Ironically it was Biden that removed the Houthis in the first place, as WSJ highlights: "The designation as a foreign terrorist organization, which the U.S. plans to formally announce on Wednesday, reverses a decision taken early in President Biden’s term to remove the Houthis from the list over concerns it hurt the prospects for peace talks and further crippled the economy of an impoverished nation at risk of famine."

The Houthis were removed from the list in 2021 after they were first designated previously under the Trump administration, also given they have long been armed and backed financially by the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Since last week, the US and UK-led coalition which also includes Australia, Bahrain, Canada and the Netherlands have conducted several rounds of airstrikes and missile attacks against Houthi positions in Yemen.

The repeat Houthi attacks, which are now almost daily, have threatened to completely shut out commercial vessels from the vital Red Sea transitway

The Houthis have claimed this is all part of the war against Palestinians, and their military operations are meant as retaliation against Israel and its most powerful backer the US. 

"The international coalition that America announced under the pretext of protecting maritime navigation in the Red Sea is an alliance to protect the Israeli entity and to protect Israeli ships. It is an integral part of the aggression against the Palestinian people, Gaza, and the Arab and Islamic nations," the group previously said in a statement.

The Saudi-UAE-US coalition has waged a brutal air war against Yemen and the rebel Houthis going back to 2015, unleashing a dire humanitarian crisis. It was during that time, especially when Washington was more deeply involved in helping Saudi pilots with targeting information, that the Houthis were first placed on the US terror list.

In light of everything that has happened over the past couple months regarding Houthi attacks on civilian vessels, it's interesting to revisit Secretary of State Antony Blinken's words in February of 2021:

Effective February 16, I am revoking the designations of Ansarallah, sometimes referred to as the Houthis, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) under the Immigration and Nationality Act and as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, as amended.

This decision is a recognition of the dire humanitarian situation in Yemen. We have listened to warnings from the United Nations, humanitarian groups, and bipartisan members of Congress, among others, that the designations could have a devastating impact on Yemenis’ access to basic commodities like food and fuel.

If the fresh WSJ reporting is confirmed, this will mark a somewhat unprecedented reversal which will see the same group go from a terror listing to being de-listed to being listed againall within a matter of a few years.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-relist-yemens-houthis-designated-global-terrorists-after-biden-removed-them-2021

COVID-19 May Have Come From Chinese Lab, Fauci’s Former Boss Says

  by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

COVID-19 may have come from a laboratory in China, a former National Institutes of Health (NIH) director said in recent closed-door testimony.

Dr. Francis Collins, the NIH director until late 2021, said that the theory that COVID-19 came from a lab in Wuhan “is not a conspiracy theory,” according to the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

The panel has released a summary of Dr. Collins’ transcribed interview since it took place on Jan. 12.

Dr. Collins, 73, who is still President Joe Biden’s science adviser, was director of the NIH from 2009 to 2021. He was the boss of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who helped craft the U.S. pandemic response.

Dr. Fauci, 83, who left the government in 2022, also told members in recent closed-door testimony that the lab leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory, according to the subcommittee.

The former officials were brought in as the panel investigates how the government responded to the pandemic.

Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci “prompted” the drafting of a paper called “Proximal Origins” that was published in early 2020 and claimed to disprove the lab leak theory, according to an email from one of the authors. Neither Dr. Collins nor Dr. Fauci were named in the acknowledgements or listed as a co-author of the paper.

Two months after the paper was published, Dr. Collins wrote to Dr. Fauci about public discussions about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this… Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy ... Anything more we can do?” Dr. Collins wrote at the time.

Dr. Fauci, meanwhile, promoted “Proximal Origins” from the White House podium before alleging he could not recall the names of the authors.

A number of experts and outlets have backtracked on their earlier position that COVID-19 did not come from a lab, including The Washington Post and the U.N.’s World Health Organization.

Dr. Collins told the subcommittee that Dr. Fauci invited him to attend a Feb. 1, 2020, conference call that featured scientists who went on to write “Proximal Origins,” according to the subcommittee.

“This testimony directly contradicts Dr. Fauci’s previous statements and raises further concerns about the U.S. government’s role in suppressing and vilifying the lab-leak hypothesis,” said the panel, which is chaired by Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio).

Other Statements

Dr. Fauci said that social distancing, or rules that required or advised people to maintain six feet of distance from others, was likely not based on any data.

It just sort of appeared,” Dr. Fauci was quoted as saying.

Dr. Collins also said that social distancing “was likely not based on any science or data,” according to the subcommittee. Social distancing underpinned a range of measures, including forcing children to stay home from school on some days after schools reopened.

Dr. Collins also reiterated attacks he’s made against the Great Barrington Declaration, which called for protecting vulnerable people like the elderly and letting younger, healthy people live largely without restrictions, the subcommittee said.

Dr. Collins told Dr. Fauci via email on Oct. 8, 2020, that the declaration was written by “three fringe epidemiologists,” even though the authors included professors from Harvard Medical School and Stanford Medical School, and that “there needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises.”

You have a federal government figure abusing his power,” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, one of the authors, told The Epoch Times previously. “Why? Because he couldn’t stand the idea that there were prominent scientists that disagreed with him about pandemic policy.”

Transcripts of the testimony from Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci have not yet been released, though members of the subcommittee say they will be disclosed at some point.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/covid-19-may-have-come-chinese-laboratory-dr-faucis-former-boss-says