Search This Blog

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Short-Term High-Dose Psoriasis Therapy Shows Potential for Long-Term Disease Control

 Short-term, high-dose treatment with risankizumab (Skyrizi) induced long-term control of plaque psoriasis in association with eradication of resident memory T cells (TRM), a small proof-of-principle study showed.

Two different doses of the interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor, administered at baseline, 4, and 16 weeks, led to 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at 52 weeks in 83% of patients. More than 60% of patients had 90% improvement (PASI 90), and 43% had 100% improvement (PASI 100).

Consistent with IL-23's essential role in plaque psoriasis pathogenesis, the TRM count declined dramatically with treatment and remained at levels similar to normal skin, reported Andrew Blauvelt, MD, of the Oregon Medical Research Center in Portland, at the American Academy of Dermatologyopens in a new tab or window meeting.

"When we look at T-cell populations of psoriasis lesions, we can see all kinds of T cells at week zero ... [but] when we look at nonlesional skin at week zero, we see relatively few T-cell populations," said Blauvelt. "At week 52 you can see right away that [lesions] look like nonlesional skin at 52 weeks."

The higher dose of risankizumab essentially eradicated all T cells at week 52, including cells that produce IL-17, another key driver of psoriasis pathogenesis, he continued. A few TRM remained at 52 weeks in patients treated with the lower dose.

"Clinical efficacy was rapid and resulted in high response rates of skin clearance through week 52 with no dose dependency between the groups," said Blauvelt. "High induction doses of risankizumab were well-tolerated, with no new safety signals... . Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the therapeutic potential of high induction doses of risankizumab to induce long-term remissions of psoriasis."

An unidentified member of the audience asked whether the results indicate remission or cure.

"I don't think it's cure," said Blauvelt. "This is a 2-year study, and the patients who were clear at week 52, I think three or four of them were still clear far into the second year. About half of them have trickled back, but it's taking a long time. I expect everybody to kind of trickle back, but it will be interesting to look at the year-2 time point and see if we have anybody at PASI 100."

In response to another question, Blauvelt noted that patients with short disease duration appear to do better with biologic agents and are more likely to maintain response with longer intervals between dosing.

"I personally think that if we use high induction doses like this in patients with short disease duration that we could possibly cure some folks," he said. "It's the hit-hard, hit-early hypothesis. We see it throughout medicine. You don't wait for the disease to establish itself to create those resident memory cells to take root."

Previous studies suggested psoriasis recurrenceopens in a new tab or window is driven by TRM. The cells remain in psoriasis lesions even after healing and can induce multiple recurrences at the same site, said Blauvelt. TRM induction and activation might be dependent on IL-23, which would be consistent with long-term remissions observed in some patients after withdrawal of anti-IL-23 treatment.

Early clinical studies of risankizumab evaluated high-dose therapy, and a single dose often lead to long-term remissions.

"The objective of this study was to go back to some of those high doses used in the original phase I studies to see whether a high induction dose of risankizumab can knock out psoriasis, induce long-term remissions, and on a tissue level, see whether [the treatment effect] is due to an effect on the resident memory T-cell population," said Blauvelt.

The single-center KNOCKOUTopens in a new tab or window study included 20 adults with moderate to severe psoriasis and no prior treatment with risankizumab. Investigators randomized the patients to 300-mg or 600-mg doses, administered at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks. Skin biopsies of lesions and nonlesional skin were obtained at baseline and week 52. The primary endpoint was the change in TRM from baseline to week 52. Secondary endpoints included safety at 52 weeks and PASI 100 at weeks 28, 40, and 52.

Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis showed different distribution of T-cell subgroups at baseline in lesional and nonlesional skin. Follow-up biopsies at week 52 showed a similar distribution of T-cell populations in lesional skin and nonlesional skin at baseline. Notably, TRM 17 cells were significantly reduced at week 52 as compared with baseline in both treatment groups (P=0.04).

Patients randomized to the lower dose of risankizumab had slightly better PASI scores. Both treatment groups achieved PASI 75 responses from week 12 to week 22 and in the 300-mg group at weeks 28 and 34. All patients in the 300-mg group met PASI 90 response criteria at weeks 16, 22, and 28 as did more than 80% of patients in both groups at weeks 34, 40, and 46. All patients in the 300-mg group had PASI 100 responses at week 22, whereas 70-80% of patients in the 600-mg arm achieved PASI 100 by week 28.

A single severe treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in the 300-mg group. No patient discontinued treatment or required dose reduction or interruption.

Disclosures

The trial was supported by AbbVie.

Blauvelt and several co-investigators reported relationships with multiple pharmaceutical companies, and some reported working for AbbVie.

Primary Source

American Academy of Dermatology

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowBlauvelt A, et al "High induction dosing of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from the phase II KNOCKOUT study" AAD 2024; Late-Breaking Abstract.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/aad/109148

NIH opens long COVID trials on treatments for autonomic nervous system dysfunction

 Part of NIH’s RECOVER Initiative, trials will test at least three treatments for symptoms such as fast heart rate, dizziness and fatigue.

People 18 years of age and older who are interested in learning more about these trials can visit https://trials.RECOVERCovid.org/autonomic(link is external) or ClinicalTrials.gov and search identifier NCT06305793NCT06305806 and NCT06305780. Please do not contact the NIH media phone number or email to enroll in these trials.

Two phase 2 clinical trials to test the safety and effectiveness of three treatments for adults with autonomic nervous system dysfunction from long COVID have begun. The autonomic nervous system acts largely unconsciously and regulates bodily functions, such as heart rate, digestion and respiratory rate. Symptoms associated with autonomic nervous system dysfunction have been among those that patients with long COVID say are most burdensome. The trials are part of the National Institutes of Health’s Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative, a nationwide research program to fully understand, diagnose and treat long COVID. Other RECOVER phase 2 clinical trials testing treatments to address viral persistence and neurological symptoms, including cognitive dysfunction (like brain fog), launched in July 2023.

“As a long COVID patient, I know firsthand how disruptive and frightening symptoms including rapid heart rate, dizziness and fatigue can be. Patient representatives across RECOVER have also shared that these symptoms are some of the most debilitating symptoms of long COVID,” said Heather Marti, co-chair of the RECOVER National Community Engagement Group. “These trials are giving me and others with long COVID hope that it will restore our health and get us back to the lives we so desire.”

The two trials, collectively known as RECOVER-AUTONOMIC, are testing three potential treatments in adults who, following COVID-19, now have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). An autonomic nervous system disorder, POTS is characterized by unexpected fast heart rate, dizziness, fatigue or a combination of these symptoms when a person stands up from sitting or lying down. 

“The trials were developed with input from people living with long COVID, caregivers, community representatives, clinicians and scientists all with unique expertise in the field,” said Gary H. Gibbons, M.D., director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the NIH and co-chair of RECOVER. “We are grateful for their collective involvement which significantly shaped the trials and the choice of interventions.”

The trials will initially examine three potential treatments:

  • Gamunex-C, a form of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), contains antibodies to help the body protect itself against infection from various diseases and is given by intravenous infusion.
  • Ivabradine, an oral medication that reduces heart rate.
  • Coordinator-guided, non-drug care, which includes a series of activities managed through weekly phone calls with a care coordinator, such as wearing a compression belt and eating a high-salt diet, which are recommended for patients with POTS to counteract excessive loss of fluids.  

“Patients who develop POTS after having COVID-19 are often severely limited by their symptoms, and there are no proven effective treatments,” said Christopher Granger, M.D., Duke University Medical Center, who is co-leading RECOVER-AUTONOMIC. “These interventions were selected because they have shown potential benefit in treating symptoms for POTS. The theory we’re testing is that they might also help individuals with long COVID.”  

Participants will first be randomly assigned to receive either IVIG, ivabradine or a placebo. Participants will then be randomly assigned a second time to receive either coordinator-guided, non-drug care or what is considered the usual non-drug care for POTS following COVID-19, such as diet and lifestyle recommendations. RECOVER-AUTONOMIC is an adaptive clinical trial, meaning if additional potential interventions emerge, they can quickly be added and studied in the trial.

Researchers plan to enroll 380 total participants at 50 sites across the United States. Teams at the trial sites will recruit participants from their health systems and surrounding communities. The current list of sites for the trials can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov (search: NCT06305793, NCT06305806 and NCT06305780) and additional sites will be added to this list as they begin enrolling participants.

Diversity among the trial participants is a high priority for RECOVER. To support diverse and inclusive representation, study sites are chosen based on geographic location, their connections to communities, and their track records for enrolling diverse research participants.

With the launch of the RECOVER-AUTONOMIC trials, RECOVER is currently testing seven treatments across four clinical trials and continues to enroll participants. Those interested in learning more about RECOVER clinical trials should visit trials.recovercovid.org(link is external).

About RECOVER: The National Institutes of Health Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (NIH RECOVER) Initiative brings together clinicians, scientists, caregivers, patients, and community members to understand, diagnose, and treat long COVID. RECOVER has created one of the largest and most diverse groups of long COVID study participants in the world. In addition, RECOVER clinical trials are testing potential interventions across five symptom focus areas. For more information, please visit recovercovid.org(link is external)

HHS Long COVID Coordination: This work is a part of the National Research Action Plan(link is external), a broader government-wide effort in response to the Presidential Memorandum(link is external) directing the Secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services to mount a full and effective response to long COVID. Led by Assistant Secretary for Health Admiral Rachel Levine, the Plan and its companion Services and Supports for Longer-term Impacts of COVID-19(link is external) report lay the groundwork to advance progress in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and provision of services for individuals experiencing long COVID.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-opens-long-covid-trials-evaluate-treatments-autonomic-nervous-system-dysfunction

RUBIO QUESTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH RISK OF CDC’S POLITICAL DOXYCYCLINE GUIDELINES

 The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recently proposed guidelines for the use of doxycycline, an antibiotic used to treat infections. However, the guidance seems to be politically motivated, recommending that “men who have sex with men” and “transgender women” should frequently ingest doxycycline to prevent sexually transmitted infections. 

Consuming an antibiotic at this frequency could increase the risk of developing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and cause long-term risks to patients and the public. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) sent a letter to CDC Director Dr. Mandy Cohen questioning the safety and scientific justification of this guidance.

  • “AMR is a serious public health threat that kills thousands of Americans every year. I am concerned that this proposal is motivated more by politics than scientific rigor or long-term effects to patient health. 
  • “The document specifically notes that the evidence used to evaluate the long-term impacts on doxycycline on the development of AMR pathogens was not ‘graded,’ calling into question the quality of evidence that was reviewed.”

The full text of the letter is below. 

Dear Dr. Cohen: 

I write with regard to the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) proposed guidance that recommends the use of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy PEP) to prevent bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). There is considerable unease that widespread use of this medication will 3 contribute to the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the United States. AMR is a serious public health threat that kills thousands of Americans every year. I am concerned that this proposal is motivated more by politics than scientific rigor or long-term effects to patient health. 

On October 2, 2023, the CDC issued proposed clinical guidance that recommends prescribing doxycycline post-exposure (an approach known as Doxy PEP) to certain populations because of the drug’s ability to reduce chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections. Prescribing a PEP medication is a common approach to prevent infections like HIV and is accomplished by taking a medication after a possible exposure. The proposal provides “updated clinical guidelines” for providers to better understand how they can prescribe Doxy PEP to prevent bacterial STI infections. The guidance recommends that “men who have sex with men” and “transgender women” with a history of at least one STI in the past year or who participate in activities that increase the likelihood of exposure to STIs would benefit most from taking 200mg of doxycycline within 72 hours of sex. 

Though the CDC did reference the risk of antibiotic resistance to patients who are prescribed Doxy PEP for this purpose, it is concerning that the agency has not adequately considered the severity of the threat that this guidance could pose to patient and public health. The document specifically notes that the evidence used to evaluate the long-term impacts on doxycycline on the development of AMR pathogens was not “graded,” calling into question the quality of evidence that was reviewed. Furthermore, the guidance points out that there is limited data on the impact of doxycycline on AMR and that there are “no studies to date on long-term, intermittent use of doxycycline and the microbiome.” It is particularly concerning that the CDC has not clarified whether it seeks to commission any additional studies to evaluate the impact of this guidance on the AMR of patients. 

In 2019, AMR caused nearly 5 million global deaths, including more than 35,000 deaths in the U.S. The CDC champions “antibiotic stewardship” precisely to ensure that antibiotics remain effective treatments for serious disease. Despite public health officials’ longstanding concern about the danger of AMR and overprescribing of antibiotics, the CDC appears now to be throwing caution to the wind. Despite these concerns, the CDC’s draft guidance is already influencing government policy and provider decision making. Major city health departments, including Chicago and New York City, have implemented this guidance. Patients are at risk of antibiotic resistant infections as a result. Because antibiotic resistant bacteria can spread between humans through proximity and poor hygiene, the risk is not confined to one subset of the population but could ultimately affect the broader public. This is the definition of a public health problem.

It is important for public health officials to combat STIs with innovative methods, but it is similarly critical that the CDC makes decisions based on science, not demands from activists that downplay the risks of novel treatments. The agency must consider the full consequences of its proposals and not mistake short-term successes for long-terms solution without rigorous, high-quality study of available data. I remain concerned that the lack of long-term data on the impacts that frequent doxycycline use may have on an individual’s AMR could cause significant issues for these individuals’ health, as well as the health of the broader public. Therefore, I request a response to the following questions: 

  1. Please list the names and/or affiliations of the AMR experts that were consulted when constructing its guidance.
    • What role did these experts play? 
    • What are their conclusions about the guidance as currently proposed?
    • Did the CDC incorporate all of the suggestions from the AMR experts? 
  2. In the proposed guidance notice, the CDC notes that it “plans to use multiple surveillance systems to monitor impacts of the proposed guidelines including potential impacts on antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance.” Please outline what the agency’s plan is to monitor antibiotic resistance among Doxy PEP users.
    • How often does the CDC intend to review data on the guidance’s impact on individuals AMR? 
  3. Does the CDC intend to commission any long-term studies on the impact of long-term, intermittent use of doxycycline on a patients’ microbiomes?
    •  If yes, when can I/we expect these studies to begin? Will the agency hold the guidance until they receive conclusive data on these long-term impacts? 
    • If no, why not? 
  4. When does the CDC plan to issue its final guidance? 

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your prompt response. 

Sincerely,


https://www.rubio.senate.gov/rubio-questions-public-health-risk-of-cdcs-political-doxycycline-guidelines/

Solid Biosciences Business Update and Financial Results

 Company ends 2023 with approximately $123.6 million in cash and investments. Combined with gross proceeds from $108.9 million private placement in January, Solid has anticipated cash runway into 2026 —

— FDA cleared IND and granted Fast Track Designation and Orphan Drug Designation for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (Duchenne) gene therapy candidate SGT-003 with patient dosing in Phase 1/2 trial expected Q2 2024 —

— Company entered into non-exclusive licensing agreement for use of its proprietary, muscle-targeted AAV-SLB101 capsid —

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/03/13/2845337/0/en/Solid-Biosciences-Provides-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2023-Business-Update-and-Financial-Results.html

Adolescent Δ8-THC and Marijuana Use in the US

 Alyssa F. Harlow, PhD1,2,3Richard A. Miech, PhD4Adam M. Leventhal, PhD1,2,3

Key Points

Question  What is the prevalence of self-reported Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and marijuana use among 12th-grade students in the US and its distribution across sociodemographic factors and state cannabis policies?

Findings  In this nationally representative 2023 survey, 11.4% of 2186 US 12th-grade students self-reported Δ8-THC use and 30.4% self-reported marijuana use in the past year. Δ8-THC use prevalence was higher in the South and Midwest US and in states without legal adult-use marijuana or Δ8-THC regulations. Marijuana use prevalence did not differ by cannabis policies.

Meaning  Î”8-THC use prevalence is appreciable among US adolescents and is a potential public health concern.

Abstract

Importance  Gummies, flavored vaping devices, and other cannabis products containing psychoactive hemp-derived Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are increasingly marketed in the US with claims of being federally legal and comparable to marijuana. National data on prevalence and correlates of Δ8-THC use and comparisons to marijuana use among adolescents in the US are lacking.

Objective  To estimate the self-reported prevalence of and sociodemographic and policy factors associated with Δ8-THC and marijuana use among US adolescents in the past 12 months.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This nationally representative cross-sectional analysis included a randomly selected subset of 12th-grade students in 27 US states who participated in the Monitoring the Future Study in-school survey during February to June 2023.

Exposures  Self-reported sex, race, ethnicity, and parental education; census region; state-level adult-use (ie, recreational) marijuana legalization (yes vs no); and state-level Δ8-THC policies (regulated vs not regulated).

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was self-reported Δ8-THC and marijuana use in the past 12 months (any vs no use and number of occasions used).

Results  In the sample of 2186 12th-grade students (mean age, 17.7 years; 1054 [48.9% weighted] were female; 232 [11.1%] were Black, 411 [23.5%] were Hispanic, 1113 [46.1%] were White, and 328 [14.2%] were multiracial), prevalence of self-reported use in the past 12 months was 11.4% (95% CI, 8.6%-14.2%) for Δ8-THC and 30.4% (95% CI, 26.5%-34.4%) for marijuana. Of those 295 participants reporting Δ8-THC use, 35.4% used it at least 10 times in the past 12 months. Prevalence of Δ8-THC use was lower in Western vs Southern census regions (5.0% vs 14.3%; risk difference [RD], −9.4% [95% CI, −15.2% to −3.5%]; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.35 [95% CI, 0.16-0.77]), states in which Δ8-THC was regulated vs not regulated (5.7% vs 14.4%; RD, −8.6% [95% CI, −12.9% to −4.4%]; aRR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.23-0.74]), and states with vs without legal adult-use marijuana (8.0% vs 14.0%; RD, −6.0% [95% CI, −10.8% to −1.2%]; aRR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.35-0.91]). Use in the past 12 months was lower among Hispanic than White participants for Δ8-THC (7.3% vs 14.4%; RD, −7.2% [95% CI, −12.2% to −2.1%]; aRR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.34-0.87]) and marijuana (24.5% vs 33.0%; RD, −8.5% [95% CI, −14.9% to −2.1%]; aRR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.59-0.94]). Δ8-THC and marijuana use prevalence did not differ by sex or parental education.

Conclusions and Relevance  Î”8-THC use prevalence is appreciable among US adolescents and is higher in states without marijuana legalization or existing Δ8-THC regulations. Prioritizing surveillance, policy, and public health efforts addressing adolescent Δ8-THC use may be warranted.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2816083

'FDA: Some Medicines and Driving Don’t Mix'

 If you’re taking a medication, is it safe to drive? Most likely, yes.

Still, before driving or operating other heavy machinery, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advises you to make sure it is safe to do.

Although many medicines will not affect your ability to drive, some nonprescription (also called over-the-counter, or OTC) and prescription medications can have side effects that may make it unsafe to drive or operate other heavy machinery. Side effects can include:

  • sleepiness/drowsiness 
  • blurred vision
  • dizziness
  • slowed or uncoordinated movement
  • fainting
  • inability to focus or pay attention
  • nausea
  • excitability

Some medicines can affect your driving for a short time after you take them. For others, the effects can last for several hours and even into the next day.

In addition, some medicines have a warning to not drive any type of vehicle (for example, a car, motorcycle, electric scooter, boat, truck, bus or train) or operate other heavy machinery for several hours after taking the drug.

Medicines That Might Affect Driving

Knowing how your medicines — or any combination of them — affect your ability to drive or operate other machinery is an important safety measure. For example, some antihistamines and sleep medications work for longer periods than others. 

Some medicines that could make driving dangerous include:

  • antipsychotic medicines
  • antiseizure medicines (antiepileptic drugs)
  • diet pills, “stay awake” medicines, and other stimulants (for example, caffeine, ephedrine, pseudoephedrine)
  • medicines that treat or control symptoms of diarrhea and urine or bladder control
  • medicines that treat or prevent symptoms of motion sickness
  • muscle relaxants
  • opioids, including some cough suppressants containing codeine and hydrocodone
  • prescription medicines for anxiety (for example, benzodiazepines)
  • sleeping pills
  • some antidepressants
  • some prescription and OTC cold remedies and allergy medicines that contain an antihistamine, nighttime sleep aids or cough medicines

Also, taking products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds, including CBD, could make driving dangerous. CBD can cause sleepiness and changes in alertness.

Some Sleep Medicines Can Impair You, Even the Next Morning

People with insomnia have trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or both. Many people take medicines before bedtime to help with their sleep difficulties. Come morning, though, some sleep medicines could make you less able to perform daily activities, including driving. 

If you take sleep drugs, talk with your health care professional about ways to take the lowest effective dose, when to take the medicines before bedtime, and when it would be safe to drive again after taking a sleep medicine. 

Allergy Medicines Can Affect Your Driving

Medicines containing antihistamines can help relieve many different types of allergies, including hay fever. But these medicines may interfere with driving. Antihistamines can slow your reaction time, make it hard to focus or think clearly, and may cause mild confusion even if you don’t feel drowsy.

Avoid drinking alcohol while using some antihistamines. Check with your health care professional about if it is okay to take antihistamines if you use sleep medicines. Those combinations can increase sleepiness or drowsiness. 

How to Avoid Impaired Driving

You can still drive safely while taking most medicines. Talk to your health care professional about possible side effects. Your health care professional might be able to change your dose, adjust the timing of when you take the medicine, or switch the medicine to one that causes fewer side effects for you. 

For nonprescription medicines, always follow directions for use and understand the warnings on the Drug Facts label. Take the medicine for the first time when you will not need to drive.

Before using your prescription medicine, follow the directions and the warnings on packaging, and read the FDA-approved labeling for patients and caregivers.

Tell your health care professional about all the medicines you are taking — plus any vitamins, and herbal or dietary supplements — and about any side effects you experience. 

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/some-medicines-and-driving-dont-mix

WW stock slumps amid report of report lenders hiring lawyers for debt talks

 WW (WW) stock dropped 13% following reports that lenders hired lawyers for debt talks with the struggling diet company.

https://seekingalpha.com/news/4079134-ww-slumps-amid-report-of-report-lenders-hiring-lawyers-for-debt-talks