Search This Blog

Thursday, October 3, 2024

'Medicare open-enrollment will be a doozy this year'

 Read plan details carefully, and expect changes to prices and coverage

Medicare open-enrollment period for 2025 is approaching - it runs from Oct. 15 to Dec. 7 - and it's shaping up to be very complicated.

That's in part because of major changes in Medicare Part D prescription-drug coverage taking effect in January; a new, optional prescription-drug payment plan; and growing financial pressures on private insurers' Medicare Advantage plans - the alternatives to traditional, or original, Medicare Parts A and B that enroll 33 million Americans.

"Open enrollment is going to be a big challenge," said Diane Omdahl, president of 65 Incorporated, a Medicare advisory service. "There are so many things people will be dealing with."

During open enrollment, Medicare beneficiaries can join, switch or drop a Medicare Part D drug plan or Medicare Advantage plan for 2025. They can also switch out of a Medicare Advantage plan and into traditional Medicare for the year ahead. (Medigap plans - optional supplemental plans for people with traditional Medicare - aren't part of open enrollment.)

Why Medicare open-enrollment decisions can be hard

Making the right Medicare choices during open enrollment to save money and get the right coverage for 2025 can be difficult. The reason: All Part D and Medicare Advantage plans are different, and Medicare beneficiaries often have more than 40 plans to choose from.

"People sometimes say, 'Tell me what the best plan is.' And I always say, 'There is no single best plan, because healthcare is so personal,'" said Stephanie Fajuri, program manager for California's free Medicare counseling program, the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP).

If you've been in a Part D or a Medicare Advantage plan in 2024, don't assume its coverage and costs will be identical in 2025 or that it will necessarily be the right plan for you next year.

"Many people just stay with the same Medicare plan as the previous year because that's the easiest. I encourage them not to, because benefits do change significantly," said Paola Bianchi Delp, president of CareNu, a healthcare company specializing in the coordination of chronic-illness care.

A recent eHealth survey of Medicare beneficiaries found that 51% have never made a change to their Medicare coverage.

Throughout September, Part D and Medicare Advantage plans sent members their Annual Notice of Change explaining how the plans' costs and coverage will change in 2025. If you have either or both of these plans, you'll want to take the time to read this carefully.

Here's how to make smart decisions during open enrollment about Medicare Advantage and Part D plans for 2025, and how to get help if you need it.

Traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage?

The first choice to make during open enrollment is whether to enroll in traditional Medicare with a Medigap plan or a Medicare Advantage plan. That may be a head-scratcher for some; a survey by the digital-health company DUOS found that 49% of respondents didn't know the difference between Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

Traditional Medicare lets you go to any physician or hospital who accepts Medicare and generally doesn't require a referral to see a specialist. But it doesn't cover dental, hearing or vision expenses and, starting next year, probably won't cover telehealth appointments (other than for things like mental and behavioral health) except for people in rural areas.

Traditional Medicare's Part A covers hospital bills and some home healthcare and generally has no premium, but has an inpatient hospital deductible ($1,632 in 2024) and daily coinsurance costs. Part B covers 80% of Medicare-approved doctors' bills after its deductible ($240 in 2024); the monthly premium in 2024 for most beneficiaries was $175. The 2025 figure hasn't been announced. People with high incomes pay a premium surcharge.

A Medicare Advantage plan (which may include a Part D drug plan) is often less expensive than the combination of traditional Medicare and a Medigap plan. Medicare Advantage plans may cover dental, hearing and vision expenses, as well as telehealth and supplemental benefits like transportation costs to doctors' offices and gym memberships. But they have limited networks of doctors and hospitals, and often require prior authorization before seeing specialists.

Medicare Advantage plans, also known as Medicare Part C, set their own premiums, deductibles and copayments. Many offer $0 premiums as a way to attract members.

Why Medicare Advantage plans may lose luster

Because Medicare Advantage insurers have been squeezed due to reimbursement changes from the U.S. government and rising usage by members, experts expect their plans to become less attractive in 2025.

Look for higher out-of-pocket costs and reductions, or even the elimination of certain benefits.

"This will be a year of regression" for Medicare Advantage plans, predicted Fran Soistman, CEO of eHealth, a health-insurance advisory firm.

He thinks many plans will reduce their dental and vision coverage and raise copays to see specialists. "There's a concerted effort to protect the benefit but to lessen its amount," Soistman added.

Omdahl said she thinks "there's going to be a lot of tweaking" in Medicare Advantage plans for 2025. "Optional benefits, I think, are a prime target. If somebody signed up for a gym membership through a Medicare Advantage plan, it may not be there in 2025."

Delp recommends that Medicare beneficiaries who lack an easy way to get to doctors' appointments look for 2025 Medicare Advantage plans offering transportation reimbursements.

Soistman expects Medicare Advantage plans rated 41/2 or 5 stars by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to be less likely than others to trim benefits or raise members' costs. That's because the top-rated plans receive more government money than others.

It could also get harder to find your preferred doctors and hospitals in Medicare Advantage plans for 2025. Two dozen health systems have said they'll stop participating in certain Medicare Advantage plans from major insurers such as UnitedHealth (UNH), Humana (HUM) and Aetna (CVS) next year.

When people ask Fajuri about choosing a Medicare Advantage plan, she said the "No. 1 thing I recommend is to ask their doctor, 'What coverage will you accept next year?'"

If you've been in a Medicare Advantage plan during 2024, that plan might not be offered in 2025. Humana is dropping out of 13 Medicare Advantage markets next year, so more than 550,000 people (10% of its participants) will lose their plans.

Should you decide to switch from Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare for 2025, don't drop your current plan until you ensure you can enroll in a Medigap plan. Many Medigap plans reject applicants with pre-existing conditions if they didn't sign up when becoming eligible for Medicare initially.

"We don't recommend switching to original Medicare without having some type of secondary coverage," said Fajuri.

Big changes coming to Part D drug plans

Medicare Part D prescription-drug plans are likely to change dramatically in 2025, too.

That's due to Medicare's $2,000 cap on out-of-pocket prescription costs for medications covered by Part D plans, which takes effect next year - a provision in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act that lets Medicare negotiate drug prices with manufacturers.

AARP estimates that 3.2 million Medicare enrollees will reach the $2,000 cap in 2025.

"I think this is going to be one of the most important open-enrollment seasons we have had on Medicare Part D because of all the changes taking place," said Leigh Purvis, prescription-drug policy principal at AARP. "People are going to need to take a very hard look at their plan options and figure out which one is best for them."

A majority of Medicare beneficiaries (87%), however, hadn't seen, read or heard anything about the upcoming Medicare Part D reforms, according to a survey by the Pan Foundation, which works on accelerating access to affordable and equitable healthcare.

Since Part D insurers will be on the hook for more of the costs of beneficiaries' medications, they're expected to respond in a variety of unpleasant ways.

"I think there could be unintended consequences of the reforms" in the Inflation Reduction Act, said Amy Niles, chief mission officer of the Pan Foundation.

Those Part D plan revisions in 2025, Omdahl said, could include: dropping coverage of certain high-priced drugs; moving drugs to higher-cost tiers; steeply raising premiums, copays and coinsurance; requiring members take certain medications before letting them take similar ones they prefer (known as step therapy) and eliminating some Part D plans altogether.

Thomas Cowhey, chief financial officer of CVS Health, the parent company of Medicare Part D insurer Aetna, recently said Part D premiums will be "much, much higher for 2025."

The $2,000 cap, incidentally, will not apply to Part B prescriptions administered by doctors or any medications not covered by your Part D plan.

Soistman anticipates standalone Part D plans will be more likely to raise members' costs than ones in Medicare Advantage plans, which will be more insulated from the $2,000-cap rule.

When researching Part D plans during open enrollment, "don't just look at their premiums," said Purvis. "There are other costs associated with your coverage, like what you're paying for your prescription drugs."

Be sure to look at the websites of potential Part D plans and Medicare's online Plan Finder to find plans that will cover your medications at prices you can afford. (A Part D plan's list of covered drugs is called its formulary.)

https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20241003327/medicare-open-enrollment-will-be-a-doozy-this-year-heres-how-to-make-smart-choices

"Just because you had something in your 2024 Part D formulary does not give you assurance that it's going to be in your 2025 Part D formulary," said Delp.

Another way to keep prescription costs down, Purvis suggested: Ensure that the pharmacies you prefer are in the Part D plan's preferred network.

The new Medicare prescription payment plan

Something else coming in 2025 you'll need to make a decision about during open enrollment: the new, little-known Medicare Prescription Payment Plan, sometimes dubbed MP3.

A striking 92% of Medicare beneficiaries surveyed by the Pan Foundation hadn't seen, read or heard about it.

Under the current Medicare prescription-drug system, people with Part D plans often get walloped with huge out-of-pocket costs every January and February - sometimes thousands of dollars - because they haven't reached their annual deductible amount and their insurance coverage hasn't kicked in.

The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act created the MP3 to avoid this problem. If you sign up for MP3 as part of your 2025 Part D plan, you'll be put on a monthly payment plan for your Part D prescriptions (not Part B ones), smoothing out-of-pocket costs during the year.

But, Delp said, "I think the prescription payment plan is going to be quite confusing for the consumer." The reason: Part D policyholders with MP3 will get two bills each month - one for their prescriptions and one for their premiums.

You'll want to run the numbers for your Part D prescriptions in 2025 to determine whether the payment plan is worth the extra hassle.

Signing up for MP3 might be unnecessary if you'll get financial assistance for your medications from either a state-run Medicare Savings Program or Medicare's low-income subsidy program, your pharmaceutical manufacturers, or groups like the Pan Foundation.

Jennifer Teague, director of health coverage and benefits for the National Council on Aging, estimates that Medicare's Extra Help subsidy program saves people roughly $5,900 a year. To qualify, your income must be lower than roughly $23,000 (about $31,000 for married couples) and you must have limited assets.

"There's a lot of complicated math that goes into how you figure out whether you should enroll [in MP3] or not," said Purvis.

Delp said snowbirds thinking about signing up for MP3 will want to be sure their mail gets forwarded to their winter locale so they won't miss seeing their Part D plans' new monthly bills.

Getting help during Medicare open enrollment

You don't need to make Medicare open-enrollment decisions alone.

Medicare's website, Medicare.gov, and the agency's annual "Medicare and You" booklet (also on the Medicare site) explain the ins and outs of traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage plans and Part D plans.

The Medicare site's Plan Finder can show you details on all the Part D and Medicare Advantage plans that will be available in 2025 where you live.

Medicare also has a customer-support line: 1-800-MEDICARE.

Another useful resource: your State Health Insurance Assistance Program, or SHIP (national phone number: 877-839-2675).

Its independent, unbiased experts can talk to you by phone or in person to clear up confusion and answer your questions about Medicare for 2025. SHIP volunteers, however, can't tell you which Part D or Medicare Advantage plan to get.

A Medicare agent or broker can assist you in selecting an appropriate Part D or Medicare Advantage plan for 2025, too. But know that these pros are paid by the insurers they represent.

"I think people just need to be mindful that agents may not necessarily provide the full universe of plan options that are available to you," said Purvis.

The Certified Medicare Agents Directory has an online list of Part D and Medicare Advantage agents, and the National Council on Aging has given Fidelity Medicare Services, a brokerage, its Standard of Excellence.

"I really like it when people talk to an agent or broker and then reach out to us to confirm what they heard," said Fajuri of California's SHIP plan, HICAP.

Timing your open-enrollment decisions

Because Medicare open enrollment will be more complicated than usual, experts advise starting your research soon.

"The more time you give yourself, the better," said Purvis. "There is a lot to wrap your head around."

If you wait until late November or early December to get help from a Medicare agent, broker or SHIP counselor, you'll likely encounter trouble getting on their calendar.

"Many [SHIP] programs book up for open-enrollment appointments as early as early November," said Fajuri.

Soistman, of eHealth, has asked Medicare to extend open enrollment by five or six days this year to give applicants, insurers, agents and Medicare staffers more time. He hasn't heard back.

But Philip Moeller, author of the new book "Get What's Yours for Medicare," recommends not locking in your open-enrollment decisions early. He suggests waiting until mid-November or even a little later.

By then, he believes, you'll be able to amass all the information you need from prospective Medicare Part D and Advantage plans, analysts and your doctors to make well-researched decisions.

But don't delay too long. If you wait until late December, the plans you want may not be able to complete your open-enrollment process before coverage begins Jan. 1.

https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20241003328/medicare-open-enrollment-will-be-a-doozy-this-2

DeSantis deploys resources to Florida ports to keep goods flowing amid 'unacceptable' strike

 Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced Thursday that he will deploy the National Guard and the State Guard to seaports in the state to ensure goods continue to flow as the state and the Southeast recover from the impact of Hurricane Helene amid the ongoing dockworkers strike, calling the Biden-Harris administration's stance "unacceptable."

Hurricane Helene made landfall last week in Florida's Big Bend as a Category 4 hurricane and carved a path of destruction through the state and into Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. The death toll has risen to at least 204, and that number is expected to rise as more areas are searched. Damaged infrastructure has complicated response efforts in the region.

The strike by unionized dockworkers at East and Gulf Coast ports has cut off the regular flow of goods into and out of impacted ports, raising concerns about its impact on recovery from the storm. President Biden has thus far declined to use his legal authority to intervene and impose an 80-day "cooling off" period that would restore operations at ports while negotiations continue.

DeSantis said in a statement that it's "unacceptable for the Biden-Harris administration to allow supply chain interruptions to hurt people who are reeling from a Category 4 hurricane" and explained his administration will take several steps to restore the flow of goods from ports to areas impacted by the storm.


Florida Governor Ron DeSantis

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said it's "unacceptable" for the Biden-Harris administration to not take action to end the dockworkers strike in the wake of Hurricane Helene. (Pedro Portal/Miami Herald/Tribune News Service via / Getty Images)

"At my direction, the Florida National Guard and Florida State Guard will be deployed to critical ports affected to maintain order and, if possible, resume operations which would otherwise be shut down during this interruption," DeSantis said at a press conference. 

"The Florida Department of Transportation is coordinating calls with seaport, rail and trucking partners to ensure that all are prepared and positioned appropriately to limit disruptions to the supply chain and other areas should this continue," he added.

placeholder
Asheville damage

Hurricane Helene brought torrential rains and historic flooding to areas of the Southeast. (Sean Rayford / Getty Images)

DeSantis also said he's temporarily waiving the collection of tolls and fees from commercial vehicles using public highways in Florida, as well as waiving the size and weight restrictions that usually govern 

DeSantis also directed the Florida Highway Patrol to help manage the flow of traffic from Florida seaports and adjacent roads and highways as needed, with police escorts available upon request by commercial vehicle operators.

dockworkers picketing at closed port

The ILA dockworkers strike has halted the flow of goods through East and Gulf Coast ports. (Mark Felix/AFP via / Getty Images)

"This is something that would have significant impacts on the nation's economy anyway, but to have this happen in a way that could negatively impact people that are reeling from a Category 4 hurricane, that is just simply unacceptable," DeSantis said of the strike's impact on hurricane recovery efforts. 

"So it really is incumbent upon the Biden-Harris administration to do everything in their power to ensure that these goods are where we need [them] to be, that people are not left hanging out in the cold waiting for these goods if they're sitting in the ocean somewhere and they're not being able to be used here in the state of Florida, or in Georgia, or North Carolina, or where people are going to desperately need this," he explained.

"We need to accelerate, we have no time for delays, Biden-Harris has a responsibility to stand up for the storm victims, stand up for the people who have had their homes damaged or have lost their homes, and make sure they have what they need to get back on their feet," DeSantis said.

The International Longshoremen's Association (ILA), which represents the striking dockworkers, is at an impasse in negotiations with port employers over its demands for wage increases and restrictions on the automation of ports.

ILA President Harold Daggett has signaled the union is willing to persist in its strike to get its demands even if it means inflicting broader damage on the U.S. economy. "I’ll cripple you," Daggett said about the effects of the strike in a September interview. "I will cripple you, and you have no idea what that means. Nobody does."

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/desantis-deploys-resources-florida-ports-keep-goods-flowing-amid-unacceptable-strike

How Biden/Harris Blew-Up The Middle East In Five Easy Steps

 by Victor Davis Hanson via American Greatness,

When Joe Biden became president, the Middle East was calm. Now it is in the midst of a multifront war.

So quiet was the inheritance from the prior Trump administration that nearly three years later, on September 29, 2023 - and just eight days before the October 7 Hamas massacre of Israelis - Biden’s national security advisor Jack Sullivan could still brag that “The Middle East region is quieter today than it has been in two decades.”

So, what exactly happened to the inherited calm that led to the current nonstop chaos of the present?

In a word, theocratic Iran—the nexus of almost all current Middle East terrorism and conflict—was unleashed by Team Biden after having been neutered by the Trump administration.

The Biden-Harris administration adopted a 5-step revisionist protocol that appeased and encouraged Iran and its terrorist surrogates Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

The result was a near guarantee that something akin to the October 7 massacres would inevitably follow—along with a subsequent year of violence that has now engulfed the Middle East.

First, on the 2020 campaign trail, Biden damned long-time American ally Saudi Arabia as a “pariah.”

He overturned the policies of both the previous Obama and Trump administrations by siding with the Iranian-supplied terrorist Houthis in their war on Saudi Arabia.

Biden accused the kingdom of war crimes, warning it would “be held accountable” for its actions in Yemen. Biden-Harris took the murderous Houthis off the U.S. terrorist list.

Almost immediately followed continuous Houthi attacks on international shipping, Israel, and U.S. warships—rendering the Red Sea, the entryway to the Suez Canal, de facto closed to international maritime transit.

Worse still, by the time of the 2022 midterms, when spiraling gas prices threatened Democratic congressional majorities, Biden opportunistically flipped and implored Saudi Arabia to pump more oil to lower world prices before the November election. Appearing obnoxious and then obsequious to an old Middle East ally is a prescription for regional chaos.

Second, Biden-Harris nihilistically killed off the Trump administration’s “Abraham Accords.”

That diplomatic breakthrough had proven a successful blueprint for moderate Arab nations to seek détente with Israel, ending decades of hostilities to unite against the common Middle East threat of Iran.

Third, Biden begged Iran to reenter the appeasing, so-called Iran Deal that virtually had ensured that Iran would eventually get the bomb.

Worse yet, it dropped oil sanctions against the theocracy, allowing a near-destitute Iran to recoup $100 billion in profits. And it greenlighted $6 billion in hostage ransoms to Tehran.

An enriched Tehran immediately sent billions of dollars in support and weapons to the anti-Western terrorists of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis to attack Israel, Americans, and international shipping. Iran soon began partnering with China and Russia to form a new anti-American axis.

Biden-Harris also fled abruptly from Afghanistan, abandoning billions in weapons and American contractors. The humiliation thus virtually destroyed American deterrence in the Middle East, inciting enemies and endangering friends.

Fourth, Biden-Harris restored hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to the West Bank and Gaza, but without any guarantees that the Palestinian Authority and Hamas would desist from their past serial terrorist acts.

In the case of Hamas, U.S. and Western “humanitarian aid” simply freed up more fungible dollars in Gaza to arm Hamas and to expand its subterranean tunnel complex essential to its October 7 massacres and hostage-taking.

Fifth, from the outset of the ensuing increased tensions, Biden-Harris began pressuring the Israelis to act “proportionally” in responding to the massacre of some 1,200 Israelis and nearly 20,000 missiles, rockets, and drones launched at their homeland from Iran, the Houthis, Hamas, and Hezbollah.

Such straitjacketing of our closest Middle East friend further signaled the Iranian-backed terrorists that there was now “daylight” between the U.S. and its closest regional ally. That opportunity provided still further incentives for Iran to test just how far it could safely go in attacking Israel.

But why did Biden-Harris so foolishly ignite the Middle East?

In part, the administration naively tried to resurrect the old, discredited Obama administration notion of ‘creative tension’—of empowering a rogue Iran and its terrorists to play off Israel and the moderate Arab regimes, as a new sort of balance of power in the region.

In part, Biden-Harris was caving to increased anti-Semitism at home and the rise of powerful, pro-Palestinian groups on U.S. campuses and in critical swing Electoral College states.

In part, Biden-Harris was naïve and gullible. The two bought into the anti-Americanism and anti-Israel boilerplate of our enemies. So, they thought to make amends by seeing Iran and its terrorists as the moral equivalent of democratic, pro-American Israel.

Their malignant legacy is the current Middle East disaster.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/how-bidenharris-blew-middle-east-five-easy-steps

Duke Energy Confirms Grid Apocalypse In NC Amid Backlash Over Biden-Harris FEMA Mess

 Duke Energy confirmed on X that hundreds of power substations are offline across the Carolinas.

We initially reported on this unfolding power grid crisis Wednesday morning in a note titled Grid Apocalypse Hits Carolinas: 360 Substations Down, Power Restoration Could Take "Months," citing experts who warned, "It could take a very long time to restore power to everyone" due to shortages of transformers and other electrical equipment and critically low US stockpiles. 

"Approximately 370 substations were out of service from the storm in the Duke Energy Carolinas service area. For those that were damaged and can't be repaired in a timely manner – mobile substations will be installed to allow us to restore service as soon as it is safe to do so," Duke wrote on X. 

Bill Norton, a spokesperson with Duke Energy, noted, "With water levels coming down, we are starting to see some of this damage. We had entire substations that were under water."

As of Thursday morning, Poweroutage.US data shows nearly a million power outages across South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia. 

We first reported the substation dilemma on Wednseday. The shortage of transformers and other grid components could leave parts of Western North Carolina without power for weeks, if not, in some cases, months.

Jesse D. Jenkins, an assistant professor and macro-energy systems engineering and policy expert at Princeton University, warned on X, 

"This is devastating. We do NOT have 360 substations worth of transformers and other electrical equipment sitting in stockpiles waiting to be deployed. It could take a very long time to restore power to everyone. Are we facing a Hurricane Maria-type impact on grid infrastructure?" 

Making matters worse for residents of North Carolina, some X users are pointing out the Biden-Harris administration supplied transformers to Ukraine. It needs to be clarified if these transformers were drained from US stockpiles.

The destruction in Western North Carolina is shocking. 

Meanwhile, AP News reported that the Federal Emergency Management Agency does not have enough funding to last through the hurricane season. 

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody told Fox News that everyone should be outraged about Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas' comment on Wednseday about FEMA not having enough hurricane funding. 

And why is that? Well, the Biden-Harris team drained FEMA funds to support their globalist ...

Folks should be outraged that the Biden-Harris team has prioritized Ukraine and illegal aliens over their own citizens. 

Seeking To Cut Food Waste (& Save The Planet), California Bans 'Sell By' Labeling On Products

 by Jill McLaughlin via The Epoch Times,

Food products sold in California will no longer have a “sell by” stamp after July 1, 2026, after Gov. Gavin Newsom approved the nation’s first law governing food labeling.

When it goes into effect, Assembly Bill 660 will require the use of two standard terms for food products that choose to use a date label—“best if used by” to indicate the quality date of food, or “use by” to indicate the safety of food.

Newsom said in a statement he also believed the new law, which he signed on Sept. 28, would better inform consumers and “significantly reduce food waste.”

Stamping food with quality or time limits is not required as part of the law. The federal government also doesn’t require foods to be issued a “use by” date on anything except baby formula.

Environmental organizations that sponsored the new law say banning the “sell by” stamp will keep more food out of the garbage bin, cutting down on methane produced at landfills.

The groups also hope the new law will cut down on confusion by requiring manufacturers to use the same phrases for date labels on all products.

California is the first state in the nation to pass the regulations, which were written by Assemblywoman Jacqui Irwin, a Thousand Oaks Democrat.

“Having to wonder whether our food is still good is an issue that we all have struggled with,” Irwin said in a statement.

“Today’s signing of AB660 is a monumental step to keep money in the pockets of consumers while helping the environment and the planet.”

With the new law in California, dates may be voluntarily applied to meat, poultry, and egg products, provided that the dates are truthful and not misleading.

Irwin said some of the phrases currently used, such as “expires on,” “best before,” and “sell by,” can be unclear to average consumers. Some consumers may think the dates are equal to expiration dates, she explained in a legislative assessment of the bill.

Owner Ray Martinez at La Playa Market in Inglewood, Calif., on Nov. 1, 2012. Food producers in the state will no longer stamp a “sell by” date on food after July 1, 2027. AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes

The confusion leads to food being wasted, strained grocery budgets, and increasing emissions of methane—a type of greenhouse gas—from rotting food, according to Irwin.

Food packagers can continue to label products with a “sell by” date only if it is coded in a format that is not easily readable by consumers and does not use the phrase “sell by,” according to a legislative analysis.

The law also allows food to be donated after the “best if used by” date has passed.

Californians Against Waste, a nonprofit environmental advocacy organization, co-sponsored the bill with the Natural Resources Defense Council, a national coalition of 3 million environmental activists.

Food products with labels printed with "sell by" and "used by" dates are seen in a file photo. Environmental groups sponsoring California's new law banning "sell by" dates say it will cut down on food waste. Joyce Kuo/The Epoch Times

Inconsistent use of phrases like “sell by” and “expires on” can make it “impossible” for consumers who don’t want to throw away good food, according to Erica Parker, a policy associate with Californians Against Waste.

“The result is a staggering amount of food waste—Californians throw away 6 million tons of food waste each year—and confusion over date labels is a leading cause,” Parker said in a statement Sept. 30.

Victoria Rome, the California lobbyist for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the bill’s signing will cut down on confusion.

“Standardizing food date labels is a common-sense solution that will keep more money in people’s pockets and food on families’ plates, while reducing climate warming emissions,” Rome said in a statement after the signing.

The Natural Resources Defense Council said California’s food waste accounts for 41 percent of the state’s methane emissions.

The group also said the U.S. wastes 40 percent of the food it produces. That’s about 20 pounds of food per person every month, according to the council’s 2012 study. The group also reported 16 percent of U.S. methane emissions was caused by organic matter dumped in landfills.

The council also believes 80 percent of the fresh water Americans use is for food production, and 10 percent of energy in the country is used to produce and distribute food.

California passed a similar law in 2017 which directed the state to promote the voluntary adoption of the “best if used by” and “use by” terms, but implementation of the standard terms fell short, according to the sponsors.

The new measure mandates the use of the terms across all products sold in California

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/seeking-cut-food-waste-california-bans-sell-labeling-products