Search This Blog

Tuesday, October 8, 2024

Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century

 

WV ballots will include constitutional question on prohibiting physician-assisted death

 West Virginians who vote in the coming general election will have a question posed about whether the state constitution should be amended to explicitly prohibit physician-assisted deaths.

Amendment One, which presents a heavy question about life and death, will typically be on the back of ballots — beneath national, state and local political races.

The explanation provided on ballots is that “The purpose of this amendment is to protect West Virginians against medically-assisted suicide.”

To vote in favor of the amendment, voters are instructed to darken the oval next to “FOR.” To vote against the amendment, voters are instructed to darken the oval next to “AGAINST.”

The amendment would add a section to the state Constitution to say, “No person, physician, or health care provider in the State of West Virginia shall participate in the practice of medically assisted suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of a person.”

Furthermore, “Nothing in this section prohibits the administration or prescription of medication for the purpose of alleviating pain or discomfort while the patient’s condition follows its natural course; nor does anything in this section prohibit the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, as requested by the patient or the patient’s decision-maker, in accordance with State law. Further, nothing in this section prevents the State from providing capital punishment.”

Physician-assisted death is legal in nine states — California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, Washington — and the District of Columbia. It is an option given to individuals in Montana via court decision. Oregon became the first state to legalize physician-assisted death in 1997.

If the ballot measure passes, West Virginia policy would be diametrically opposed to those states.

Pat McGeehan

The measure was placed on West Virginia ballots because members of the state Legislature passed a resolution during the most recent regular session. One of the most outspoken legislators has been Delegate Pat McGeehan, R-Hancock.

McGeehan has since distributed several written op-ed pieces to local newspapers and appeared in broadcast interviews with national platforms like Washington Watch, which is on streaming channels and Christian TV stations, and EWTN Pro Life Weekly, which stands for Eternal Word Television Network, a cable channel with Catholic-themed programming.

“Most people don’t even know that it’s illegal or legal. If you want to firmly prohibit it, put it in the state Constitution – because you never know who’s going to be in office next. It might not be guys like me. It might not be guys that are pro life on the Republican side. You do not want arbitrary judgments on good vs bad suicide being decided by government officials,” McGeehan said on Washington Watch earlier this year.

In a written opinion article distributed on his behalf by the state Legislature, McGeehan urged state residents to vote in favor of the amendment. He made reference to a study showing that in Canada the fifth most common cause of death is assisted suicide.

“That’s why it is vital to vote for Amendment One this November. It secures our state from medically-assisted suicide and the culture of indifference and carelessness it promotes. It affirms the goodness of suicide prevention. And it sends a clear and confident message that West Virginia is not a place of fear and despair, but a state of courage and hope,” McGeehan wrote.

West Virginians for Life, the state affiliate for the National Right to Life Committee, released a statement this week urging West Virginians to vote in favor of Amendment One.

Mary Tillman

“If there is a fear of pain at the end of life, good palliative care and hospice care are ways to provide comfort and care until a person’s life ends naturally,” said Mary Tillman, legislative coordinator for the West Virginia alliance for Ethical Health Care, a subcommittee of West Virginians for Life.

“A vote FOR Amendment One will protect all West Virginians from physician-assisted suicide. This November, please vote to keep West Virginia a state where all lives are valued and protected.”

The national organization Death with Dignity describes West Virginia as “under threat.” That organization characterizes West Virginia’s ballot measure as eliminating a potential option for terminally ill people.

“While Death with Dignity is already illegal under current West Virginia law, this constitutional amendment would mark the first time any state amended its constitution to explicitly prohibit aid in dying,” the organization wrote on its website.

“Never before has a legislature in this country mobilized an attack like this on terminally ill patients. And to make matters worse, proponents of the ban are on a press tour spreading malicious lies about how Death with Dignity works in states where it’s legal.”

ACLU West Virginia is also urging a no vote. The organization says medically assisted suicide is not legal in West Virginia. And the organization says constitutions exist to safeguard individual freedoms from government overreach — but this amendment does the exact opposite.

Eli Baumwell, interim executive director for ACLU West Virginia, said the amendment is an example of government overreach.

“‘Mountaineers are always free’ is a promise that the ACLU of West Virginia works every day to ensure is kept. Amendment One runs counter to that promise by enshrining a prohibition into the state constitution designed to take away the last free choice Mountaineers can make,” Baumwell said.

Eli Baumwell

“West Virginians, like most Americans, do not believe that the government should interfere in personal medical decisions. As shown by the Legislature going zero for four last year in seeking permission from the people to modify our Constitution, they do not represent the will of the people. Instead, they represent a dangerous and out of touch minority: lawmakers who want to take the last medical decision you can ever make about yourself.”

Gov. Jim Justice, a Republican, seemed to be considering the matter when asked about his position on the constitutional amendment during a recent administration briefing. Generally, Justice described himself as pro-life and suggested it’s good for citizens to have a direct voting opportunity on the issue.

Gov. Jim Justice

“I’m as pro-life as I can possibly get,” Justice said in response to a MetroNews question. “These issues, I guess, would have to go to a vote, is that correct? And so with all that being said, I think listening to the great people of West Virginia, letting them make the decision and everything is always the smart money to us.”

He continued, “I think to resolve an issue like this we go to the people. The people tell us what to do.”

https://wvmetronews.com/2024/10/06/west-virginia-ballots-will-include-a-constitutional-question-on-prohibiting-physician-assisted-death/

Over 200 Florida healthcare facilities evacuating patients ahead of 2nd hurricane in 2 weeks

 A rapidly intensifying Hurricane Milton has Florida and its healthcare providers gearing up for another severe weather event less than two weeks after similar preparations for Hurricane Helene.

As of midday Tuesday, over 200 healthcare facilities, including 12 hospitals and freestanding hospital emergency departments, have initiated evacuations, officials and the Florida Hospital Association said. The evacuations are primarily focused in Florida's Pinellas and Hillsborough counties, which include St. Petersburg and Tampa.  

"The challenge as a result of Helene is that those areas that are likely to be significantly impacted by Milton are still contending with debris everywhere, the sand and other debris clogging drains," Mary Mayhew, president and CEO of the Florida Hospital Association, told Fierce Healthcare Tuesday. "Milton is forecasted to have a significant surge along the coast and a volume of rain, so the vulnerability to extreme flooding is significant."

Hurricane Milton jumped ahead of weekend forecasts when it strengthened to a Category 5 storm in the Gulf of Mexico midday Monday, according to the National Weather Service.

It is expected to drop to a strong Category 3 by the time it makes landfall late Wednesday or early Thursday near Tampa—still “a very large and powerful hurricane … with life-threatening hazards at the coastline and well inland,” the service warned. Unlike September’s Hurricane Helene, which brought destruction to the states north of Florida, it is projected to move east through Florida and out to the Atlantic.

While a strong storm in its own respect, the short turnaround from Helene has officials worried that saturated groundwater, strained infrastructure and, in particular, uncleared debris could compound the damage.

“That creates a huge hazard,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who signed a state of emergency declaration for 51 counties, said during a Monday afternoon press conference.

During Monday and Tuesday addresses, the governor noted that the state was prioritizing hospitals alongside other critical infrastructure, and had recently coordinated the construction of a flood wall around an unnamed hospital.

Florida’s Department of Health has deployed almost 600 emergency response vehicles, including more than 350 ambulances on hand to support first responders, officials said.

Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) said it is conducting daily calls with the Florida Hospital Association and Florida Healthcare Association alongside other emergency event reporting procedures. The groups had relied on similar coordination efforts leading up to Helene, during which a total of six hospitals across the state were forced to evacuate patients.

As of Tuesday morning, AHCA said it had received reports of 212 healthcare facility evacuations, including 10 hospitals, two freestanding hospital emergency departments, 115 assisted living facilities and 50 nursing homes. 

AHCA has also made nearly 700 phone calls to providers ahead of the storm's landfall, and said it has "waived all prior authorization requirements for critical Medicaid."

Fortunately, Mayhew said that the state's hospitals had not suffered "any significant damage to their physical plant" as a result of September's Helene, which she credited to comprehensive investments in flood mitigation systems, electrical infrastructure and other areas. 

However, the homes of many hospital employees living in Helene's path were affected, "and so certainly the ability to staff and support our employees is critically important as we brace for Milton." 

Additionally, Mayhew noted that hospitals are already dealing with a shortage of IV solutions after a plant supplying over 60% of the country's supply was shut down by Helene. Further disruptions are "clearly part of the equation for concern if this storm compounds access to those supplies or any other critical hospital supply," such as fuel for hospital generators, she said.

Preparations to minimize disruptions in patient care are a priority at the moment, but Mayhew acknowledged that much of the hospitals and her group's work will come in Milton's wake. 

"One of the roles we seek to play as an association is gathering real-time data and information to inform areas of need and opportunities for engagement and coordination among our hospitals in response to emergencies," she explained. 

The could relate to transferring patients if a facility is damaged, coordinating supplies and picking up the slack for community-level care. 

"The impact on retail pharmacies, on assisted living facilities, is critically important," she said. "We've had hospitals that have had to fulfill that role, that have a retail pharmacy license when the local retail pharmacy was offline. There are patients in our hospitals that may be ready for discharge back to their assisted living facility, and yet that assisted living facility is no longer functional because of the impact of the storm. All of that will be part of the equation as we respond and as we recover."

The work extends to regulatory and administrative issues that could become barriers to care immediately and in the weeks following a disaster, Mayhew continued. 

The association will work with the state's health agency to request certain flexibilities "primarily from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services related to patient care," she said. That said, in Florida much of Medicare and Medicaid is administered by private insurers, she explained, leaving state and federal government agencies "limited authority to require these private insurance companies to adhere to important flexibilities" like prior authorization.

The Florida Hospital Association will make its case to these private insurers, though Mayhew said that a warm response isn't guaranteed. 

"I would love to say that this has been readily embraced by insurers, but that has not always been the case," she said. "We will certainly work closely with them to ensure not only that it it is embraced, but that they are communicating with our hospitals related to these flexibilities." 

Also on the table would be accelerated and advanced payments, which could help hospitals avoid a cash flow issue that impedes care. Such assistance was authorized by the federal government last week for those reeling from Helene's damages.

In regard to Milton, "until that is specifically requested or guidance provided by the state and the federal government, I don't expect that we will see that," Mayhew said. "But again, [as] we understand the full impact of the storm and how long it may disrupt operations and impact revenue, we certainly may seek that assistance."

HCA Florida Healthcare, the 48-hospital subsidiary system of for-profit giant HCA Healthcare, told Fierce Healthcare Tuesday it was “actively working” to transfer patients from five of its most threatened hospitals to other sister facilities.

These hospitals include HCA Florida Englewood Hospital, HCA Florida Fawcett Hospital, HCA Florida Largo West Hospital, HCA Florida West Tampa Hospital and HCA Florida Pasadena Hospital—the latter of which required several days to bring patients back in during the wake of Helene.

HCA Florida’s other preparations are being quarterbacked by its Enterprise Emergency Operations Center in Nashville, which has an almost-200-person multi-disciplinary team "ensuring our hospitals have enough staff, medications, supplies, food, water and generator power to continue to operate and care for our patients during and after the storm,” it said in a statement. 

Pinellas County, which is a peninsula located on the western side of Tampa Bay, has given evacuation orders for residential healthcare facilities in the majority of its evacuation zones. Hillsborough County, which contains Tampa, has also issued mandatory evacuation notices for multiple evacuation zones.

Tampa General Hospital, the region’s only Level I Trauma Center, wrote in a Tuesday morning update that its hospitals will remain open and "as we demonstrated with Hurricane Helene" are prepared to handle an emergency. 

The organization said it has activated its emergency response plan and “stands ready to meet the needs of patients throughout the state who require care after the storm has passed.” Much like during Helene, those preparations include a central energy plant built to withstand a Category 5 hurricane, supply stores and an “AquaFence” barrier able to withstand up to 15-foot storm surges. Several other outpatient and clinic locations will be closed from Tuesday to Thursday. 

BayCare said it initiated an evacuation of its Morton Plant North Bay Hospital on Monday morning, and that elective procedures elsewhere have been canceled for Wednesday and Thursday. It also will be offering one free telehealth visit for anyone using its BayCareAnywhere app (using the coupon code "MILTON"). 

James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, in Tampa, and all of its affiliated outpatient clinics will be closed for in-person appointments and elective surgeries from Tuesday to Wednesday. 

Other Florida health systems like AdventHealth and UF Health said their hospitals remain open but that some operations and service offerings may change as they monitor the hurricane’s development.


This Exercise May Help Lower Back Pain, No Special Equipment Needed

 Adults younger than age 45 with chronic, nonspecific lower back pain saw significant pain relief with a structured run-walk program in a randomized trial.

At the end of 12 weeks, participants in the program scored their pain level an average 15.3 points lower (95% CI 5.3-25.3), on a 100-point scale, than a "waitlist" group who received usual care, according to Patrick J. Owen, PhD, of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and colleagues.

Participants' assessment of their disability also improved significantly with the program relative to usual care, as assessed with the Oswestry Disability Indexopens in a new tab or window (difference 5.2 points out of 100, 95% CI 0.2-10.1), they reported in the British Journal of Sports Medicineopens in a new tab or window.

It's one of the first prospective studies to examine whether running -- previously shown to help prevent lower back painopens in a new tab or window -- might help relieve the condition when already established, the researchers said.

The benefit seen in the trial wasn't unalloyed, however. Of the 20 patients assigned to the program, nine experienced adverse effects considered "likely study-related." These included seven cases of knee and/or ankle pain and one of cardiac syncope. The ninth individual experienced worsened back pain, Owen and colleagues noted. None of these, though, were considered serious.

Owen's group observed that running has often been discouraged for people suffering chronic back pain, with clinicians often preferring to recommend lower-impact activities such as swimming or cycling. Actual evidence for this, however, has been scant, and given that running is arguably more popular -- and less needful of expensive equipment or facilities such as pools -- a scientific test of its therapeutic potential was warranted, the researchers suggested.

The ASTEROIDopens in a new tab or window (Assessing Safety and Treatment Efficacy of Running On Intervertebral Discs) trial got underway in 2022. Forty adults younger than age 45 with chronic, nonspecific lower back pain were recruited and randomized 1:1 to the program or the waitlist. People already running regularly were excluded, as were those with acute or intermittent back pain.

Mean age for those enrolled was about 33 and half were women. Self-rated current pain scores averaged 31 in the intervention group and 40 among controls. This latter difference was also reflected in related baseline measures: disability scores were higher and regular physical activity levels considerably lower in the control group.

As Owen and colleagues explained, the program involved "short running intervals interspersed with rest periods of walking," at three 30-minute sessions per week. Interactive video consultations were provided regularly, and participants received written information about running, but they were on their own to perform the prescribed activities. During each session, participants performed six to 10 repeats of run-walk cycles lasting 2-4 minutes.

Running intensity was scaled up over 13 stages; participants began at stages 1-3, depending on how they performed during a 2-minute running test at baseline. Each successive stage involved more running and less walking. Thus, participants at stage 1 ran for about 2 minutes per session, increasing over the 12 weeks to as much as 24 minutes (In practice, few participants followed this steady progression; individuals' actual running distances rose and fell almost randomly from week to week, although the general trend was upward in most cases).

Usual care consisted of standard primary-care level advice and over-the-counter medications. Following the main study period, control participants could then receive the intervention.

Owen's group stopped short of wholeheartedly backing the intervention as a therapy for lower back pain, in part because of the small number of participants and their careful selection. It also wasn't certain which aspects of the intervention -- the actual exercise versus the education and contact with professionals -- were most responsible for the reduced pain. It might have mattered, too, that the control group was in worse pain and was less active at baseline than those assigned to the program.

But the investigators did offer a hedged recommendation: "While it is unclear if running should be used to treat nonspecific chronic LBP [lower back pain], given the potential health benefits, a conservative run-walk programme likely represents a suitable form of exercise training for individuals with nonspecific chronic LBP who enjoy running or have avoided running in the past due to safety concerns."

Disclosures

ASTEROID was supported by Deakin University.

Owen disclosed no relationships with industry. Co-authors disclosed support from a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant and the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.

Primary Source

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowNeason C, et al "Running is acceptable and efficacious in adults with non-specific chronic low back pain: the ASTEROID randomised controlled trial" Br J Sports Med 2024; DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108245.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/primarycare/backpain/112308

Biden-Harris' FAA May Finally Greenlight Musk's Starship Launch After Suspicious Delays

 Elon Musk's SpaceX and the Federal Aviation Administration have been locked in disputes on when the Starship mega-rocket will blast off from SpaceX Starbase in Texas. 

After a month of delays, SpaceX revealed on X that Starship's fifth launch could begin as early as Sunday. The initial launch date was slated for mid-September

Since the FAA fined SpaceX $633,000 for safety violations in Florida and $633,000 for environmental violations at Starbase - while slowing down rocket launches, the private space company has moved to speed up timelines. Company execs have warned that FAA regulatory hurdles are nothing more than 'lawfare' by Biden-Harris admin officials.  

San Antonio Express-News noted, "Chatter of a mid-October launch began last week when a Coast Guard Notice to Mariners about the launch appeared online." However, the FAA dismissed that, saying, "We are not issuing launch authorization for a launch to occur in the next two weeks—it's not happening."

SpaceX provided more details about the upcoming Starship test flight:

Starship's fifth flight test could launch as soon as October 13, pending regulatory approval.

A live webcast of the flight test will begin about 30 minutes before liftoff, which you can watch here and on X @SpaceX. You can also watch the webcast on the new X TV app. The launch window will open as early as 7:00 a.m. CT. As is the case with all developmental testing, the schedule is dynamic and likely to change, so be sure to stay tuned to our X account for updates.

Flight 4 was a tremendous success. A fully successful ascent was followed by the first ever booster soft-landing in the Gulf of Mexico and Starship making it through a brilliant reentry, before its own landing burn and splashdown in the Indian Ocean.

The fifth flight test of Starship will aim to take another step towards full and rapid reusability. The primary objectives will be attempting the first ever return to launch site and catch of the Super Heavy booster and another Starship reentry and landing burn, aiming for an on-target splashdown of Starship in the Indian Ocean.

Extensive upgrades ahead of this flight test have been made to hardware and software across Super Heavy, Starship, and the launch and catch tower infrastructure at Starbase. SpaceX engineers have spent years preparing and months testing for the booster catch attempt, with technicians pouring tens of thousands of hours into building the infrastructure to maximize our chances for success. We accept no compromises when it comes to ensuring the safety of the public and our team, and the return will only be attempted if conditions are right.

Thousands of distinct vehicle and pad criteria must be met prior to a return and catch attempt of the Super Heavy booster, which will require healthy systems on the booster and tower and a manual command from the mission's Flight Director. If this command is not sent prior to the completion of the boostback burn, or if automated health checks show unacceptable conditions with Super Heavy or the tower, the booster will default to a trajectory that takes it to a landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico.

The returning booster will slow down from supersonic speeds, resulting in audible sonic booms in the area around the landing zone. Generally, the only impact to those in the surrounding area of a sonic boom is the brief thunder-like noise with variables like weather and distance from the return site determining the magnitude experienced by observers.

Starship will fly a similar trajectory as the previous flight test with splashdown targeted in the Indian Ocean. This flight path does not require a deorbit burn for reentry, maximizing public safety while still providing the opportunity to meet our primary objective of a controlled reentry and soft water landing of Starship.

One of the key upgrades on Starship ahead of flight was a complete rework of its heatshield, with SpaceX technicians spending more than 12,000 hours replacing the entire thermal protection system with newer-generation tiles, a backup ablative layer, and additional protections between the flap structures. This massive effort, along with updates to the ship's operations and software for reentry and landing burn, will look to improve upon the previous flight and bring Starship to a soft splashdown at the target area in the Indian Ocean.

With each flight building on the learnings from the last, testing improvements in hardware and operations across every facet of Starship, we're on the verge of demonstrating techniques fundamental to Starship's fully and rapidly reusable design. By continuing to push our hardware in a flight environment, and doing so as safely and frequently as possible, we'll rapidly bring Starship online and revolutionize humanity's ability to access space.

Last month, Musk explained at the All-In Summit about troubling lawfare by the feds to slowdown Starship's progress.

"Lawfare costs lives," Musk noted last week on X. 

Musk called out the fed's "lawfare" on Tucker Carlson. 

All of this lawfare against Musk and his companies is because Democrats hate X's free speech. Hillary Clinton and John Kerry said the quiet part out loud in recent days and weeks. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/pending-regulatory-approval-biden-harris-faa-may-finally-greenlight-musks-starship

'Certain Arm Positions Can Lead to Inaccurate Blood Pressure Readings'

 Certain arm positions -- supported on a lap or hanging by the side of the body -- led to significant overestimation of blood pressure readings compared with standardized positioning, a randomized trial in JAMA Internal Medicine

opens in a new tab or window showed, raising concerns about misdiagnosis or overestimation of hypertension.

In this video interview, researcher Tammy Brady, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, discusses the findings and implications.

The following is a transcript of her remarks:

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide. And in fact, in the United States, cardiovascular disease accounts for approximately 800,000 deaths per year. Really key to preventing cardiovascular disease is screening for hypertension, and key to hypertension screening is getting accurate blood pressure measurements.

Now, many people don't recognize that there are various patient preparatory steps and positions that are recommended in the guidelines for measurement. Many of these steps take time and occasionally require additional resources to comply with. In fact, several studies have shown that healthcare providers don't always adhere to these steps.

So with this in mind, my co-investigators and I were really interested to see how important arm support and position is to blood pressure measurement accuracy.

For context, the guidelines state for a blood pressure measurement that the arm needs to be supported on a desk or a table, with the arm position in such a way that the middle of the cuff is at mid-heart level. Now, many settings don't have a desk or other support for the arm, so they often make due by either having their arm rest in their lap or hang at their side. So again, we were curious to know if either of these two other positions had an impact on blood pressure accuracy.

To answer this question, we recruited 133 adults from the community to participate in a crossover randomized clinical trial. What we did is we took each of those participants and sorted them at random into one of six possible groups that differed by order of the three seated arm positions. Again -- on the desk, in their lap, or at the side.

Everything else about the blood pressure measurement was standardized, specifically before each measurement was taken, we made sure all the participants emptied their bladders and then we had them walk for 2 minutes to mimic a typical scenario of them walking into the clinic or to the office before the screening takes place. Then they each underwent 5 minutes of seated rest periods with their back supported, their feet supported, and then each person wearing an upper arm blood pressure cuff that was selected in size based on their upper arm size.

[They] had three sets of triplicate measurements taken with a digital blood pressure device 30 seconds apart. After they finished each set of three measurements, the cuff was removed and then they walked for another 2 minutes to wash out any potential effect of embedded rest and then rested again for 5 minutes.

Now, because blood pressure varies from minute to minute B2B, all participants underwent a fourth set of triplicate measurements with their arms supported on a desk. This was done to account for those well-known variations in blood pressure readings, and then we used this in our difference-in-differences analyses.

What we found was that a lack of arm support and suboptimal arm positioning in fact significantly impacted blood pressure readings. Blood pressure measurements obtained when the arm was resting in the lap overestimated systolic blood pressure by 3.9 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by 4 mm Hg, and measurements obtained with the arm hanging at the side overestimated systolic blood pressure by 6.5 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by 4.4 mm Hg.

When screening for hypertension, it shows that it's really essential to make sure you properly position your arm. By not doing so, you run the risk of having a falsely elevated blood pressure and potentially misdiagnosing a patient.

I think this work also highlights how important it is to not only educate healthcare providers, but also patients who conduct home blood pressure measurements to make sure they position their arms properly. One of the important parts of our guidelines states that prior to diagnosing someone with hypertension, patients need out-of-office blood pressure measurements. Again, we're looking to exclude the white-coat effect that could falsely elevate a clinic blood pressure measurement. The findings from our study regarding arm position apply regardless of setting, whether they're in the home or clinic. So if patients don't know that they need to support their arms and position them properly, they may be providing their healthcare providers with inaccurate readings, contributing to a misdiagnosis.

It's my hope that our paper reaches patients for this very reason, since I think so much rides on home blood pressure measurements.

While it may take an initial investment in time and resources to make sure that the blood pressure measurement setting is set up for proper measurement, I really think the return on investment has the potential to be significant in terms of not only better patient care with fewer misdiagnoses, but in savings and time. Patients having to return for measurements takes time, resources with repeat appointments and needing healthcare staff for those appointments, and money. Patients are going to lose time at work, they have to spend time in an evaluation and on medications. So again, the initial investment I think will have a big impact.

My hope is that this study alerts healthcare providers and patients alike to the importance of arm position and support to measurement. It's really more than just putting on a cuff and pushing the button, and I hope patients will feel empowered to ask for repeat measurement in ideal conditions, which includes this arm support and positioning, if their blood pressure reading is ever elevated.

I also hope that healthcare providers recognize that it's really important not only to train and certify those individuals in charge of measuring blood pressure in the clinic, but you need to retrain and recertify every 6 months to make sure that there's no skill decay. And if you're prescribing an out-of-office blood pressure measurement, taking the time to educate patients on the proper steps is really key to making sure you get the right diagnosis.

Disclosures

The study was supported by Resolve to Save Lives (RTSL), which is funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gates Philanthropy Partners/Chan Zuckerberg Foundation.

Brady disclosed no relationships with industry. Two co-authors disclosed relationships with, and/or support from, RTSL, the NIH, Kowa, RhythmX AI, and Fukuda Denshi.

Primary Source

JAMA Internal Medicine

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowLiu H, et al "Arm position and blood pressure readings: the ARMS crossover randomized clinical trial" JAMA Intern Med 2024; DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5213.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/cardiology/prevention/112311