Search This Blog

Thursday, November 14, 2024

How Helene Gave Way to 'Hurricane Snafu' in the Carolinas

by James Varney

 It wasn’t as if the Tar Heel state didn’t see Hurricane Helene coming. On Sept. 25, one day before Helene stormed ashore, North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper declared a state of emergency as the storm’s path showed it churning northward toward Appalachia after making landfall in Florida.

AP
North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, right, and Deanne Criswell, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, brief Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris on Hurricane Helene in early October.

Yet that advance declaration was not followed by any state evacuation orders, and the population largely sheltered in place as Helene hit the steep, wooded hills of western North Carolina, squatting over the area, unleashing more than an inch of water an hour for more than a day. The unprecedented, relentless downpour, falling on ground already saturated by rain the week before, tore old pines and hardwoods out by the roots, creating arboreal torpedoes that rocketed down the steep inclines; water that turned photogenic stony creeks into whitewater torrents, lifting ancient streambed boulders and tossing them like chips on to roads and into homes and buildings. The once-in-a-millennium storm left 225 people dead, nearly half of them in North Carolina, with dozens still missing as of early November.

As residents in Asheville, Chimney Creek, and other smaller communities continue to pick up from the carnage, after-action reports indicate government agencies at the federal and state levels were slow to react. Interviews with several private relief groups that sprang into action after Helene, along with statistics provided by congressional sources, indicate that Cooper’s office and the Biden administration were slow to activate military personnel and assets like helicopters that were critical in the days after the storm. In addition, budgetary moves and internal communications have also drawn questions about how the Federal Emergency Management Agency is spending its money and how it envisioned its purpose in a Biden administration suffused with “diversity, equity and inclusion” mandates.

FEMA is also wrestling with revelations that politics had influenced some of its relief efforts. The agency fired a staffer who told crews to avoid houses in storm-damaged parts of Florida that displayed Donald Trump campaign signs. The dismissed worker said this week her orders were not an isolated incident and that FEMA avoided “politically hostile” zones in the Carolinas, too.

“There seems to have been a priority shift, period,” said Eric Eggers, the vice president of the conservative Government Accountability Institute. “It seems impossible to separate its mission creep and its ideological pursuit of an agenda when its duties are to fix that bridge or clear that road.”

AP
Where were the choppers? The Coast Guard pulls off a hurricane rescue off Sanibel Island, Fla. (above). But badly needed government helicopters were a rare sight in devastated western North Carolina.

As devastating and increasingly expensive natural disasters continue to be a fact of life in the United States, FEMA’s halting response, especially in the early days after Helene, when lives were in jeopardy, suggests both the capabilities and limits of state and federal responses. 

In the first days, survivors told RCI that the impact of governments’ slow-footed efforts was countered by the heroic efforts of private citizens and groups who rushed to provide help. As FEMA and others began to assert themselves, some conflicts arose between government representatives and volunteers, although everyone RCI spoke with agreed that such disasters inevitably spawn chaos. There is no such thing as a “perfect response,” but many people said the one following Helene teaches important lessons.

Helene didn’t slam into western North Carolina the way hurricanes typically do, but instead squatted like an angry demon over the region in which the economically important fall tourist season was just swinging into gear. 

Courtesy of Jamie Shell
Jamie Shell, editor of the Avery Journal-Times, relied on a hookup from Elon Musk's Starlink.

In Avery County, a parks and recreation gymnasium had been set up as a shelter with approximately 40 beds and generators for backup power, according to Jamie Shell, the editor of the weekly Avery Journal-Times and a lifelong Tar Heel.

“On the day prior to the storm, we were in touch with the county emergency management office and county manager to get a feel for where they were in terms of initial response,” he said. “I remember a number of generated auto-calls and emails from the county to the county residents informing them of the historic and potentially devastating nature of the event, warning people to make plans to seek higher ground and evacuate as needed due to the torrential rains and damaging winds that would arrive.”

By Friday morning, Shell said people were fending off the elements as best they could.

“It was a case where most everyone who were not necessary (emergency) personnel were pretty much sheltering in place, as roads were being littered with fallen trees and high water, with the worst damage along creeks and rivers,” he said. 

Power soon went out, making communication difficult for both survivors and potential rescue efforts, and creeks crested, complicating overland travel. Shell said some roads remained passable, but without power or an aerial view, it was impossible for people to find shelter if their homes were damaged or lost, and for relief efforts that didn’t have small planes or helicopters to get to wrecked spots, and even then potential landing zones were unclear.

Here, too, politics has emerged to cloud the relief picture. Shell said he relied on a Starlink hookup, the satellite company launched and owned by Elon Musk, and that county officials were also reliant on Musk’s system. Private relief agencies told RCI that Starlink provided thousands of Starlinks, which they distributed via helicopter after Helene, offering torn-up zones their only method of communication.

highspeedinternet.com
Private groups distributed nearly 1,000 Starlink hookups to powerless homes as the feds fell short on broadband access.

Between them, the United Cajun Navy and Operation Helo, two of the private groups that operated rescue and relief operations with helicopters, distributed nearly 1,000 Starlink hookups to powerless homes. Musk trumpeted the fact that Starlink’s services would be free in the remainder of 2024 for Helene and Hurricane Milton victims, although there are reports users are still being hit with hardware starter costs.

Such assistance from Starlink might have been greater, according to some congressional sources, had the Federal Communications Commission not canceled an $885.5 million deal with Starlink to expand rural broadband access. Instead, the Biden administration sunk $42 billion into a rural broadband access program that has not hooked up any customers – a failure that dogged Vice President Kamala Harris in her failed presidential campaign – as Harris was the point person on that project.

Some Republican officials in Washington have grumbled that Cooper and the Biden administration moved too slowly in terms of activating the National Guard or the huge U.S. Army assets at Fort Liberty, formerly Fort Bragg, in North Carolina. Information provided by the state to Congress and shared with RCI shows the state’s “rotor and fixed-wing aircraft” made available rose from fewer than 10 in the storm’s initial 48 hours to 20 by Sept. 30, but it stayed at that number for three full days. North Carolina Highway Patrol provided fewer than five helicopters through Oct. 9.

Congressional sources also provided information showing there were fewer than 1,000 troops available for relief efforts until Oct. 3.

NewsNation/YouTube
United Cajun Navy leader: "For about four or five days most of the search and rescue was done by private people.”

Private relief agencies, untangled by orders, swung into action more quickly.

“When I got there, all I heard was, ‘Where’s FEMA? Where’s FEMA?” said Brian Trascher, a leader of the United Cajun Navy, a private disaster relief outfit that formed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. “In fact, FEMA moves fairly quickly once they know where the problem is but otherwise everything was a cluster-f___. They didn’t have anything prepositioned and so for about four or five days, most of the search and rescue was done by private people.”

But Trascher offered praise to FEMA, too. He had been meeting with FEMA officials in Washington as Helene approached, part of an ongoing effort by the feds and the Cajun Navy to cooperate better in response to disasters. It is not true that FEMA was invisible in Helene’s immediate aftermath – Trascher said he ran into a top official he knows within hours of his arrival in North Carolina – and FEMA staff on the ground were committed and hard-working, he said.

That take was echoed by others deeply involved in the first few days of Helene’s response. Of the four private relief groups that discussed the situation with RCI, all agreed FEMA officials in western North Carolina were earnest, but said both the federal bureaucracy and the military response proved creaky. 

The air over the Helene-ravaged landscape was wide open in the first few days, and the private helicopters were free to go wherever they could. That began to change once federal agencies came into the picture. The Federal Aviation Agency did give out some “squawk codes” to the flyers working with private groups, Trascher said, but more codes and a better-coordinated response with the FAA are needed going forward, according to Trascher and Eric Robinson, a co-founder of Operation Helo.

AP
Franklin Graham of Samaritan's Purse with Donald Trump in Georgia. Graham said private groups like his are free of the red tape that customarily snarls government bureaucracies.

The private relief executives also expressed doubts that FEMA had the most experienced hands on deck. In addition, although many National Guardsmen in the area are native Tar Heels and were champing at the bit to help, they were repeatedly snarled by delays in orders, according to several people familiar with the first days of response. 

“We ran it like a military op,” Robinson said of Operation Helo, a group based in North Carolina that was born in Helene’s aftermath. “But the strength of the storm, the amount of water, I don’t think anyone anticipated that.”

Robinson described whole towns annihilated, saying there were lakes “that it looked like you could walk across, there was so much debris floating.” His team distributed more than 517 Starlinks and was also assisted personally by Ivanka Trump in the week after Helene struck.

At one point, Robinson said there were people marooned on a hilltop, and his group asked the National Guard to handle the job. Though more than willing, the guardsmen had to wait more than three hours for their orders. “We just went and got them in the meantime,” he said.

Another group distributing emergency aid and Starlinks was Samaritan’s Purse, the international relief agency whose Boone headquarters left it literally at Helene’s ground zero. 

“We all knew the storm was coming and we were ready,” said Franklin Graham, the group’s president and chief executive. “But none of us were prepared for the infrastructure’s collapse.” 

Like other private officials involved in relief efforts, Graham was far from biting in his criticism of FEMA and North Carolina agencies. Similarly, he acknowledged, as Trascher and Robinson did, that private groups enjoyed freedom from the red tape that customarily snarls government bureaucracies.

“I do think FEMA might be better if it wasn’t run by a political appointee,” Graham said. “It was working in our favor initially that there were no rules, and what we saw was a true example of neighbors helping neighbors.”

FEMA
A FEMA spokesperson insisted that the charge the agency has lost touch with its core mission is false ...

As of early November, FEMA said it had spent “approximately $4.3 billion on Hurricane Helene response and recovery.” Of that total, some $213 million went in direct assistance to 126,000 North Carolina households, with another $202 million “for debris removal and reimbursement of emergency protective measures for the state.”

Helene also brought new attention to FEMA’s budgeting. Even as they pushed money out to storm victims, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who oversees FEMA, and other Biden administration officials began raising alarms that the agency could run short on hurricane relief money.

But along with those calls came revelations from Homeland Security’s watchdog Inspector General that the agency was sitting on $73 billion in unliquidated funds committed to previous disasters – including  $8.3 billion for those declared in 2012 or earlier. The agency has also spent nearly $4 billion on COVID relief in September, the same month as Helene – including for funeral expenses, vaccination and testing sites, and personal protective equipment. That spending was paused in September to shift money to its Immediate Needs Funding, FEMA said, but it acknowledged $3.8 billion was “obligated” for the virus that peaked in 2021.

Gov. Cooper’s office also pushed back against reports it may have been tardy in calling up the National Guard or responding to hard-hit zones.

“The North Carolina National Guard was activated and on the ground before, during and after the storm and we believe this was the fastest and largest integration of active-duty military soldiers under Title 10 working with the National Guard in North Carolina history,” said Jordan Monaghan, a spokesman for the governor. “Immediately following the storm, staged equipment and personnel began moving into western NC, using Asheville’s airport as a staging area where supplies were flown in, loaded onto helicopters and flown into counties that couldn’t be reached by road. Where roads were passable, supplies were delivered by truck.”

On Sept. 30, Cooper asked Biden to “make all necessary federal resources available,” and that so-called “Title 10” request was approved by the Defense Department on Oct. 2, according to Monaghan. At that point, helicopters and other key assets took to wing.

Both FEMA and Cooper’s office stressed the unprecedented nature of Helene, and that view was echoed by Trascher, who said some of the areas the Cajun Navy serviced were “the worst I’d seen since Katrina.” 

As of early November, power outages had fallen from more than 1 million to fewer than 900, while roughly 1,000 of the 1,300 closed roads have been opened, according to Cooper’s office. All told, there have been “2,024 FEMA workers and thousands of Department of Transportation workers, utility workers, law enforcement officers and volunteers on the ground.”

FEMA
... but it isn't hard to find an emphasis on identity politics on FEMA's website.

Yet under the Biden administration’s “whole of government” emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion, there are indications FEMA has moved away from a broad-based relief template.

In the past two weeks, FEMA also became embroiled in the scandal surrounding the orders of the now-dismissed staffer that Hurricane Milton relief crews should bypass homes displaying Trump campaign signs. The former supervisor, Marn’i Washington, told The Black Star Group’s digital platform that her orders were not an isolated incident. Instead, they reflected long-standing agency policy that calls for avoidance of areas or homes it considers “politically hostile.”

“FEMA always preaches avoidance first and then de-escalation, so this is not isolated,” she said. “This is a colossal event of avoidance not just in the state of Florida, but you will find avoidance in the Carolinas.”

In an in-house 2023 Zoom meeting that has received renewed attention, FEMA and other federal officers focused on how disasters allegedly hit the LGBTQ community with special fury. In that meeting, FEMA Emergency Management Specialist Tyler Atkins said LGBTQ people and others who have been disadvantaged “already are struggling,” and natural disasters compound their struggles.

Global Heat Health Information Network
Maggie Jarry, HHS: Emergency management in the U.S. must shift from prioritizing “the greatest good for the greatest amount of people” to “disaster equity.”

Maggie Jarry, a Senior Emergency Management Specialist with the Department of Health and Human Services, then chimed in, saying emergency management in the U.S. must shift from prioritizing “the greatest good for the greatest amount of people” to “disaster equity.”

“We have to look at policies and understand to what extent they have disadvantaged communities that have less assets, communities that have pre-existing vulnerabilities in accessing disaster-related recovery supports,” Jarry said.

A FEMA spokesperson told RCI that any notion the agency has lost touch with its core mission is false.

“FEMA’s mission remains clear and unchanged – to help people before, during, and after disasters,” he said. “We are fully committed to ensuring that all communities have the support they need to prepare for and recover from disasters. FEMA’s disaster response efforts and recovery programs are funded through the Disaster Relief Fund, which is a dedicated fund for disaster efforts. Disaster Relief Fund money has not been diverted to other, non-disaster related efforts.”

FEMA’s Helene response enjoyed considerably better coverage than it received during Hurricane Katrina in 2005 when media accounts blistered the agency and the Bush administration for weeks. This time around, there were many stories outlining what FEMA does and does not do, with the former primarily involving reimbursement to state and local projects for debris removal, reconstruction, and the like. It also provides cash to survivors in the immediate aftermath of declared disasters.

Many media outlets also magnified FEMA’s attempt to combat “misinformation,” and these reports frequently blamed the Trump campaign for spreading unfounded rumors. At one point, FEMA even paused relief operations in parts of North Carolina over unfounded rumors that vigilantes were “hunting” FEMA workers.  

Those pro-FEMA slants lost considerable traction last week, however, when the story broke about FEMA relief teams in Florida deliberately bypassing homes that displayed support for Trump’s campaign.

All of these threads – the Biden administration’s “Justice40” for diversity, equity, and inclusion; the spending on matters unrelated to natural disasters or tied up in endless projects going nowhere; federal contracts to help rural America canceled – add up to an unsavory “politics of disaster relief,” according to the Government Accountability Institute.

Eggers and Peter Schweizer, the Institute’s leader, examined the problem in a recent podcast by that name. What happened after Helene is further evidence of that problem, Eggers said.

“In some ways, it’s a triumph of the human and American spirit, but in other ways, it seems like a failure of the American government,” he said.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/11/13/how_helene_gave_way_to_hurricane_snafu_in_the_carolinas_1071753.html

Soros Woke Prosecutor Movement Big 2024 Loser

 While former President Donald Trump’s historic comeback rightly garnered most of the headlines following last week’s elections, the campaign of liberal megadonor George Soros to “reimagine” the American criminal justice system through soft-on-crime prosecutors and policies was also dealt a crushing blow on November 5. In total, at least a dozen Soros-linked district attorneys went down.

The most high-profile district attorney race in the country this year was in Los Angeles, where incumbent Democrat George Gascon was facing off against Independent challenger Nathan Hochman. Gascon, who received $2.5 million from Soros-linked groups in 2020, has long been a standard-bearer of the “woke” prosecutor movement. He was an early advocate of ending cash bail, refusing to charge anyone under 25 as an adult, and downgrading charges for crimes he considered to be “victimless,” such as vandalism and robbery. Violent and nonviolent crime has skyrocketed under his watch.

Following two recall attempts against Gascon which fell just short, LA voters finally ousted Gascon this year, with Hochman winning 61.5 percent of the vote to Gascon’s 38.5 percent. Even as Kamala Harris won LA County by 30 percent, voters still chose Hochman, a former GOP nominee for California Attorney General, by 24 percent.

Just up the coast in Alameda County, outside of San Francisco, voters also recalled far-left District Attorney Pamela Price, who had been in office for less than two years and received more than $1 million from Soros-linked groups. The recall, led by the group “Save Alameda for Everyone,” a local grassroots organization, passed with 64.8 percent of the vote.

Price has garnered controversy throughout her tenure for her unapologetic “prison last” approach to criminal justice. One of her first actions after taking office was dropping two murder charges in a high-profile triple homicide case against Delonzo Logwood, a career criminal who killed three people outside a club in 2016. After Price took office, she dropped two of the homicide charges and downgraded the final murder charge to “voluntary manslaughter.”

As a result, Logwood went from a potential charge of life without parole to a sentence of only 12 years. Because the charge includes time already served, he is now looking at early release within a few years.

The Logwood case became an immediate rallying point for the movement to recall Price and culminated in her ultimate removal in this deep-blue progressive stronghold.

In Oregon, Democrat Multnomah County DA Mike Schmidt lost his re-election bid to one of his own office’s deputy attorneys, Nathan Vasquez. Schmidt was one of the primary backers of the ballot measure to decriminalize virtually all drug use in Portland, Oregon. According to the New York Post, shortly after the measure passed, “the city declared a state of emergency after an explosion of fentanyl deaths” and “cops resigned en masse — with many citing Schmidt as the reason for their exit.”

Vasquez ran his campaign on a simple pledge to return the city to “sanity” by re-engaging with police and reestablishing the rule of law.

On the other side of the country, Western Georgia District Attorney Deborah Gonzalez, a Democrat backed by Soros-linked groups, was also soundly defeated. While the votes are still being finalized, Republican challenger Kalki Yalamanchili will likely defeat Gonzalez with more than 60 percent of the vote. The county she presided over was where illegal immigrant Jose Ibarra brutally murdered nursing student Laken Riley this past February.

According to The Daily Caller, Gonzalez focused her campaign on “Alternative accountability-based measures to address most nonviolent crimes or issues presented by juvenile defendants.” Yalamanchili conversely pledged to crack down on illegal immigrants taking advantage of an “ineffective” DA’s office.

Since 2015, through a series of shell non-profits and PACs, Soros has led an aggressive campaign to impose his radical vision of “criminal justice” – which contains little actual justice – on America. In total, Soros has poured more than $40 million into at least 75 local prosecutor races throughout the country.

At the peak of his influence, 50 hand-picked Soros DAs presided over more than 20 percent of the country’s population, paving the way for an explosion of crime and chaos on the streets of some of America’s most important cities. But as of this November, the majority of these prosecutors have either resigned, been recalled, or been defeated outright at the ballot box.

Nonetheless, there were some victories for Soros-backed DAs this year. In Savannah, Georgia, progressive prosecutor Shalena Cook Jones held on to her seat, while Soros-backed Monique Worrell reclaimed her position as the Orange-Osceola State Attorney in Florida after being suspended last year by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for “dereliction of duty” on crime. Other high-profile Soros DAs like Alvin Bragg in Manhattan – a key player in the Democrat lawfare crusade against Trump – also remain in office.

But the tide appears to have clearly turned against the Soros prosecutor movement. From a powerful force in the American legal system just a few years ago, it may soon become just a footnote in history.

https://amac.us/newsline/elections/soros-woke-prosecutor-movement-big-2024-loser/

Hagerty: No One Has Channelled Public Frustration With Weaponization Of DOJ Better Than Gaetz

 Tennessee Republican Sen. Bill Hagerty responds to Donald Trump nominating Rep. Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, during an interview Thursday with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell.



SEN. LISA MURKOWSKI: I don't think it is a serious nomination. We need to have a serious Attorney General, and I'm looking forward to the opportunity to consider somebody that is serious. This one was not on my bingo card.

SEN. SUSAN COLLINS: I was shocked that he has been nominated. If the nomination proceeds, I'm sure there will be an extensive background check by the FBI, public hearings, and a lot of questions.


ANDREA MITCHELL, MSNBC: What is your reaction to Matt Gaetz as Attorney General? Right now, would you support it?

SEN. BILL HAGERTY: It is amazing to me that people are reacting the way they are, as you just showed, because there has been no one better at channeling the American public's frustration with weaponization through the Department of Justice than Matt Gaetz.

You can understand the President's frustration with the DOJ. During his first campaign, they used a fake Clinton dossier to spy on him. Look at what happened in the first Trump administration—this who fake Russiagate hoax. The DOJ investigated him for years over that. In 2020, the DOJ went to Big Tech and had them censor Hunter Biden’s laptop to throw the election to Hunter Biden. And if you think about what just happened, the DOJ and their colleagues around the country brought five different cases against President Biden’s top opponent, President Trump. I can understand his frustration and wanting to put an agent of change in place. I'm not surprised at all.

ANDREA MITCHELL: I don't want to litigate what happened with Donald Trump because there is a lot of evidence to support many of the allegations and the indictments -- Mar-a-Lago, the sloppy intelligence handling--

SEN. BILL HAGERTY: The American people spoke louder than anybody, they gave him the strongest mandate in 50 years in their reaction to all of this.

ANDREA MITCHELL: But a Trump-appointed judge cut that off, and it wasn’t fully vetted, so let’s just acknowledge that -- this was the legal system at work, no question.

SEN. BILL HAGERTY: It was not working; it was weaponized.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Well, what about this nominee? This nominee has a record himself. He has been an outspoken critic, but what about his personal record? There were questions about him. He was on the House floor sharing photos of women, bragging about his sexual exploits, the medication he used, the drugs that he used. The Ethics investigation has not been released yet; it was cut off. It was supposed to be voted on tomorrow, but his resignation has aborted that. What about all of the questions and the allegations against him? His co-conspirator and friend is serving an 11-year jail sentence for sexual trafficking. There was plenty to investigate there.

SEN. BILL HAGERTY: You said it yourself -- these are allegations. It's amazing that you are more upset about allegations than you are about the weaponization of the Department of Justice. The American public has completely lost faith in the DOJ. Think about it. The DOJ sent their agents to spy on parents who go to school board meetings. It is just amazing. As the American public sees this, they see somebody like Matt Gaetz who is willing to stand up and call it all wrong. And President Trump is willing to put somebody in place who will change this.

ANDREA MITCHELL: This is the same Justice Department that indicted and prosecuted Hunter Biden.

SEN. BILL HAGERTY: Think about what this Justice Department did in 2020. They reached out to Big Tech to get information and censor that laptop, with that letter that was put together by Antony Blinken, by the way. If you think about the political dirty tricks that have gone on with the Biden administration, Antony Blinken got 51 so-called intelligence experts to sign a letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation and the DOJ cooperated with them to basically went out and brokered a deal with Big Tech to censor the laptop. They threw the election to Joe Biden as a result of that. This DOJ has got huge problems that need to be cleaned up.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/11/14/sen_bill_hagerty_no_one_has_channelled_the_publics_frustration_with_the_weaponization_of_doj_better_than_matt_gaetz.html

Barack Obama: The Political Genius That Wasn't

 by Richard Truesdell and Keith Lehmann via American Greatness,

Every few months, a sanitized report appears on the post-presidency activities of Barack Obama’s public advocacy.

It’s a narrative that conveniently ignores the inherent problems in having a person with no constitutional role or congressional oversight take an active role in executive decision-making.

Over the summer of 2024, Obama emerged as a central figure in government censorship of the internet while launching a new campaign against gun ownership. In earlier times, the spectacle of an ex-president leading simultaneous campaigns against the First and Second Amendments might have generated some interest in the legacy media. But as last week’s election coverage proved, the press is no longer interested in reporting hard facts or maintaining transparency. The mockingbird media are now servants of those holding power and will do anything to advance their interests.

Yet there is another interpretation of Obama’s peculiar involvement with Democrat operatives during the Trump and Biden administrations. It is that Obama was never the leader of anything, neither then nor now.

Post-presidency, Obama was fixated on collecting laundered wealth from intermediaries such as Spotify and Netflix, buying luxury properties, and hanging out on private yachts with celebrities. His stratospheric levels of egotism and absence of self-awareness motivated him to occasionally appear in public next to Biden as a larger, more popular figure, signaling that he was “The One” who was calling the shots. We know this to be completely false.

Obama has proven to be a celebrity-obsessed, pretend billionaire with the lazy pretense of having any positive influence whatsoever on the inner workings of the American government. He has presented himself as a self-consumed lightweight who was breathtakingly narcissistic even by Washington, D.C., standards.

Floating to the Top on a Cloud of Projection

Obama’s lack of managerial experience and his thin understanding of important issues did not matter—Democrats wanted a malleable figure as the leader of the Free World who could speak decisively, travel the world repeating leftist platitudes convincingly off a teleprompter, and sign anything put in front of him.

What Democrats failed to comprehend was that the projection of their beliefs onto a relatively unknown, singular person was to create a figure that would ultimately destroy their party in ways they did not anticipate. Obama’s far-left beliefs, his antipathy toward America, and his racial divisiveness were somewhat hidden at first, yet became quite obvious as he was put on a pedestal by Democrats who were blinded by his charm.

Nowhere was this more evident than after Kamala Harris was installed as the candidate. The failure of his vice presidential understudy, Joe Biden, was pushed aside after the disastrous first presidential debate where he seemed dazed and confused. Democrat power brokers, specifically Obama along with Nancy Pelosi, knew there was no way that Biden could defeat Donald Trump in November.

What they didn’t count on was Biden immediately endorsing his vice president. Obama and Pelosi didn’t see that move coming. As a result, politically, they got caught completely flat-footed. It was wonderful for all of us on the right to watch and as much as any political move in 2024, it ensured Harris’s and the Democrats’ stunning defeat.

This should come as no surprise to anyone who has observed presidential politics from the moment Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009, to last week’s election. The cult of personality surrounding Obama prevented the damage from being seen in its entirety until well after Obama’s second term. His radicalism, hatred of America and Israel, and his tendency to be attracted to wealth and fame compromised his presidency and explained how the Democrat Party lurched so far to the left and alienated a large portion of its moderate base.

Obama’s fascination with billionaires led to an emerging oligarchy, especially in the tech sector, tightening its grip on the government at large. His penchant for “settling scores” resulted in the weaponization of nearly every government agency against American citizens. Race relations were set back to the 1950s. Inequality skyrocketed. The Tea Party emerged. Donald Trump was elected. “Russiagate” was born. The Democrat-supporting legacy media began its sudden decline in viewership and readership. It all started with Obama in the White House, continued through Trump’s first presidency, and the sham of what was the Biden-Harris administration. Biden’s cognitive decline was hidden from America until it was too late.

Looking back through the prism of history, the Obama years didn’t end well for Democrats. When Obama took office in 2008, Democrats held 55 Senate seats and 256 seats in the House. After Obama’s second term ended in 2016, Democrats had lost nine seats in the Senate and 62 seats in the House. There were twelve fewer Democrat governors, with Democrats overall holding fewer elected offices nationwide at any time since the 1920s.

For all the platitudes of his political intellect and savvy manner of operation, Obama has been a down-ballot disaster for Democrats. But it has been a goldmine for Obama, who is now in his fourth mansion. We have to wonder how anyone in the Democrat Party thinks they got their money’s worth with Obama.

It’s not hard to see how rewarding this was for Obama. He knew that division and racial strife were the path to electoral victory for the left. By reigniting animosities and weaponizing the federal government against his political opponents, a process that intensified during the Biden administration, Obama took extreme, unprecedented measures to achieve short-term gains and position himself as the central figure in Democrat political circles.

He wanted fame, fortune, adulation, worship, and no accountability. He achieved all of that and more, becoming the de facto “kingmaker” of the Democrat Party.

What exactly were the motives of Democrats when they elevated a junior senator from Illinois to be the central figure of their party? To answer that question, one must understand the criminal enterprise that Washington, D.C., has become over six decades and the need for an effective frontman to charm the population. Bill Clinton served that purpose quite well for two terms after being elevated similarly.

But Obama was an unknown entity with far fewer accomplishments than Clinton. Obama was the DEI-approved face of the Democrat machine that could operate with near impunity, reflexively branding any attempt to resist or criticize him as racist. A political and racial arsonist to his core, Obama scorched the earth at every opportunity and dared anyone to challenge him. It was the most destructive and divisive presidential period in modern history.

Obama utilized the radicalism that was honed during his time as a “community organizer” in Chicago and applied it to the nation. He engineered conflict, caused chaos, and pitted people against each other. It was the classic Marxist notion of “oppressor versus oppressed,” where winners and losers, villains and heroes, innocence and guilt, are unilaterally determined. People were labeled, vilified, categorized, and ostracized from society simply by their beliefs. Violence against them was justified and even celebrated.

Democrats were genuinely “riding the tiger” with Obama and were unsure exactly where he would lead them. Well, here we are—a nation completely divided, at each other’s throats, leveling hyperbolic charges against strangers, all because we had to have the equivalent of a DEI hire in the White House to assuage our “racial strife.” And how is that “racial strife” going today?

More to the point, “How are the Democrats doing today with Obama as their de facto leader?” Horribly, as the 2024 election has proven.

The ironic aspect of this will be missed by many. Obama rose to power in 2008 because the 18- to 25-year-old Millennials believed in his stature as the Black Jesus. In 2024, the 18- to 25-year-old Gen-Zs abandoned him because they don’t.

With the electoral drubbing Democrats took last week, with recriminations on who to blame being spread across Democrat circles, Obama’s political “brilliance” has been revealed as pure fiction. You can say that the mask has been ripped off with the presidency and both Houses of Congress now in Republican hands.

Trump is moving at lightning speed to fill his cabinet with people who hold dear his populist message. Trump went through this game eight years ago and has a clearer picture of how the sausage is made in the D.C. swamp. And with a clear mandate from voters, he knows he has at least two years to fix the mess with the economy and at the border that he’s inherited from Biden (with plenty of help from the puppet master pulling his strings from the shadows in what has turned out to be the third term of Obama’s presidency).

Key to Trump’s success - and if he can retain control of the House and Senate in the 2026 midterms - will be to bring the warring parties in Ukraine and Russia as well as the Middle East to the negotiating tables, and at the same time fix the damage to the economy wrought by Biden, Harris, and Democrats in Congress. If he does, it will cement his legacy while at the same time, likely ending Obama’s influence and interference in American politics once and for all.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/barack-obama-political-genius-wasnt

From canceling Christmas to murdering family, Dems not coping with Trump’s win very well

 In the wake of President Trump’s smashing victory over Kamala Harris, we’ve seen countless leftist meltdowns, many of which were comedic gold; but they’ve also erupted in spiteful hostility, and even murder.

First up, white “liberal writer” Andrea Tate of Huffington Post, who penned an essay for the outlet in which she detailed her growing resentment for her husband… all because he voted for Trump, then had the audacity to make a social media post that read, “God Bless America. God bless #45, 47.” The horror.

“How could a Latino vote for Trump?” Tate wondered. Well, apparently quite easily; Trump “broke a record with Latino voters” and earned a “highest-ever”percentage of the Latino vote. Andrea, I know this is probably hard for you to understand with your white savior complex mentality, but people are individuals, not groupthink cattle divided by skin color like your party implies, and many of them can in fact think for themselves, Latinos included. And, American Latinos also want their dollar to be worth something, they too want safe streets and communities and a good education system, and like every other American, Latinos want to achieve prosperity, which cannot be done under big government Democrat rule.

Here’s what else she wrote:

Later that night, I briefly glanced at my husband and found myself not wanting to look into the eyes I love. I hated this divide. I wanted to touch his forearms and feel our connection, but I also felt an urge to punish him and deny him my touch.

Oh, and she is cancelling Christmas because she cannot stand to be “celebrating the birth of Jesus” with people who would ever vote to protect babies in the womb knitted together by the Father. Lady, I think you might be the lukewarm water Jesus spits out (Revelation) , the practicer of lawlessness He commands to depart (Matthew).

They’re vindictive and awful little brats aren’t they? What’s really ironic, is the attractive traits and characteristics that Tate lists are no doubt because he’s conservative. He’s a “strong” and “good man” who would give of himself to others sacrificially—these are not traits of leftists. If she wants a Kamala Harris voter, she’s going to get someone like Doug Emhoff, a philandering, abusive man who uses women for sex before pressuring them into abortion to avoid responsibility and accountability for his actions.

But hey, at least Andrea Tate is holding it together a little better than some of her fellow Democrat comrades.

Many of you may have already heard about the rabid anti-Trump Minnesota dad who shot his ex-partner and two precious sons, but there’s been another one, via a report at the New York Post:

Wife of prominent trans writer hacked father to death with ice ax after Trump’s election night victory: cops

Burke had been upset about the election and knew Trump would handily beat Vice President Kamala Harris when she allegedly snapped — apparently when her father, Timothy Burke, refused to turn off the lights. 

She then went upstairs, grabbed an ice ‘pickax,’ tripped her father, choked and bit him on the floor, and struck him repeatedly with the blunt and sharp ends of the tool, police said.

Vice reported today that the number of LGBTQ “crisis hotline” calls have spiked a whopping 700% since Trump’s victory—how often have we seen in-crisis “trans” people acting out in homicidal rages? Too many to count.

These people are deranged, having been whipped up into states of hysteria by a Democrat media and Democrat politicians, and they’re growing more violent. Earlier this week, I wrote a blog on a viral movement spreading across the leftist side of social media, encouraging women to lethally poison Trump-voting men.

Is it any surprise that mentally ill people are drawn to the party that affirms their delusions and paranoia? Hardly.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/11/from_canceling_christmas_to_murdering_family_members_the_democrats_are_not_coping_with_trump_s_win_very_well.html

Baxter restarts 2nd IV manufacturing line: 3 shortage updates

 Baxter restarted a second IV solutions manufacturing line at its North Carolina facility this week as part of its recovery following Hurricane Helene. The line, along with the first that restarted Oct. 28, represents 50% of the site's total production capacity and 85% of its production of 1-liter IV solutions, according to a Nov. 14 news release from the company. 

Here are three other shortage updates: 

  1. Baxter expects to reach 100% allocation across several IV product codes by the end of 2023. The company plans to increase production capacity through phased updates in late November, mid-December and at year's end to support customer planning. 

  2. Baxter is on track to restart production of peritoneal dialysis solutions and irrigation lines in early December, with the goal of restoring full production by the end of the year.
     
  3. A second temporary bridge, installed at the site as of Nov. 4, is helping facilitate the movement of trucks and equipment. This has allowed the delivery of more than 1,100 truckloads of finished products to customers since the first bridge was operational, the release said.

How a Trump administration could shape the future of telehealth

 Under the first Trump administration, telehealth benefitted, The Wall Street Journal reported Nov. 14. 

For example, in 2020, federal regulators waived a rule requiring in-person evaluations before prescribing controlled substances via telemedicine, a change that advocates say has expanded access to critical opioid-use disorder treatments, especially for rural patients. 

However, some telemedicine companies have faced scrutiny for overprescribing stimulants under this policy.

The current waiver is set to expire on Dec. 31, but in October, the DEA signaled plans for another temporary extension. This would give the new administration time to develop a permanent policy, according to the report. Kyle Zebley, senior vice president of public policy at the American Telemedicine Association and executive director of its advocacy arm, expressed support for a rule that maintains access while adding safeguards against misuse.

"This will be a piece of unfinished business that the Trump administration will inherit," Mr. Zebley told the publication.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/telehealth/how-a-trump-administration-could-shape-the-future-of-telehealth.html