Search This Blog

Saturday, April 12, 2025

NY Parole Board — including one who married murderer — make $190K, freed 43 cop killers

 New York’s Parole Board is a patronage mill stuffed with leftist ideologues and political has-beens who each rake in an astounding $190,000 yearly — including at least one member who married a cold-blooded killer.

A Post examination of the 16 members — whose salaries have skyrocketed 87% since 2019, even as they freed 43 cop killers in the past eight years  — is almost as disturbing as their pro-criminal decisions.

Heading the list is Tana Agostini.

Tana Agostini was appointed to the New York Board of Parole in 2017 by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo — four years after she used her clout to engineer the parole of a convicted murderer she fell in love with and married.NYS BOARD OF PAROLE

She used her clout as a staffer of the state Assembly committee overseeing prisons in 2013 to engineer the parole of Thomas O’Sullivan — whose three-decade prison stint for the hired 1982 murder of a Queens drug dealer included an escape and biting off part of an inmate’s nose.

Agostini fell in love with and married O’Sullivan while he was in prison and successfully pressed the Parole Board to free her husband.

In 2017, then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo tapped Agostini to serve on the board.

She’s among 11 Democratic cronies the NYC mayoral frontrunner appointed or re-appointed to the panel.

All are still serving as holdovers — some under terms that expired more than five years ago.

The current board is also filled with former lefty state legislators, Legal Aid Society lawyers, public defenders and other longtime prisoner-rights advocates.

Agostini’s husband Thomas O’Sullivan was convicted for the hired 1982 murder of a Queens drug dealer.

A handful of ex-parole and probation officers and former prosecutors round out the group.

Cuomo “stacked the parole board with his leftist friends who have no appreciation for the sacrifice our police make, and it is just horrific and inexcusable that his board has released 43 convicted cop killers,” former Gov. George Pataki told The Post.

The Republican called Cuomo’s appointees another example of his “abject failure as governor to understand the impact of violent crime,” which also includes Cuomo signing controversial bail reform into law in 2019 widely blamed for New York’s rising recidivism rates.

“It’s hard for me to believe that anyone who cares about public safety or protecting the police who risk their lives for our safety could have allowed this to happen — but Andrew Cuomo certainly did,” Pataki said.

The board began its wave of releasing cop-killers in 2017, after Cuomo reshaped how it decides whether to grant parole.

The new guidelines, which were backed by liberal activists, require the board to consider an inmate’s “progress” behind bars, as well as their risk to society, with such factors outweighing the egregiousness of the original crime, sources told The Post.

The board also considers age. Many paroled inmates have been 60 or older.

Murderer David McClary — the ruthless gangbanger who assassinated rookie NYPD cop Edward Byrne in Queens in 1988 on the orders of a drug kingpin — could become the 44th cop killer freed by the board when he heads before the it later this month, The Post exclusively reported last week.

Being a parole board member became lucrative under Cuomo, with salaries soaring 67% through two separate raises — going from $101,600 to $170,000 by 2021.

Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s parole board nominees were too woke and helped spur a wave of convicted cop killers being sprung early, according to critics.Stephen Yang

Board members under Hochul received an additional 12% raise in January, bringing their overall salary to $190,000. The pay hike was approved in November by the state Commission of Legislative, Judicial and Executive Compensation as part of a larger package that included fat raises for commissioners and board members at other state agencies.

The huge pay hike comes as the board’s workload is apparently decreasing.

The board handled 11,336 cases in 2022 — down 45% from 20,504 four years earlier, according to a legislative report released last year. There are two more board members now than in 2022, but still short of the 19-member capacity. Current data on cases was not immediately available.

The $190,000-a-year salary is an “insane amount to pay people whose only qualification is that they’ll release every criminal they meet,” fumed a veteran NYPD cop.

Former Gov. George Pataki called Cuomo’s appointees another example of his “abject failure as governor to understand the impact of violent crime.”Getty Images for Tribeca Festival

“There are plenty of former cops who could do a better and fairer job than the current parole board,” the police officer said. “They would give breaks to people who really deserve it, but they wouldn’t forget that they have a responsibility to the victims, too.”

Parole hearings are held by a panel of three board members selected randomly “by a computer program,” said a state Department of Corrections and Community Supervision spokesperson. Panelists go to regional officials statewide to conduct interviews with convicts over video-conference calls, and render a decision after deliberating.

Victims’ families do not attend hearings. Instead, their “victim impact statements” are presented to the panel. Families can give testimony to a parole board member, but the inmate isn’t present.

The hearings are not public, and what scant information exists about board decisions must be obtained through an official Freedom of Information Request that takes weeks or months to fulfill.

Inmates can have hearings every 12 to 18 months after they become parole eligible, and families can draft a new impact statement each time.

Gov. Kathy Hochul has filled five parole board seats, but three still remain vacant.Matthew McDermott

Prisoner-rights activists have long called for the state to employ 19 board members to speed up cases, and Hochul has repeatedly promised she would.

Board members are nominated by the governor, and must be confirmed by the state Senate.

Five Hochul nominees now sit on the board – including former state Assemblyman Darryl C. Towns (D-Brooklyn), whom she named chairman in 2023.

However, some of her nominees were rejected or ripped by Senate members for not being woke enough.

For instance, Hochul in 2023 nominated four candidates — including two ex-probation officers, a former public defender and a former police official, New York Focus reported in October.

The Senate’s Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic, and Asian Legislative Caucus issued a statement condemning the nominations, saying they’ve “been closely associated with the system we seek to reform, which raises profound concerns.”

The Senate eventually confirmed all the appointees except former NYPD Chief Legal Officer Ernest F. Hart.

Edward Byrne was assassinated in Queens in 1998. His killer is vying for parole.

Another Hochul appointee, Brandon Stradford of Staten Island, was fired by the governor in 2023 after just two months on the job, following a bizarre series of incidents that included him showing up late for meetings and falling asleep on the job, New York Focus reported.

Stradford declined comment.

Jim Walden, a longtime lawyer and former federal prosecutor running for mayor as an independent, said he’s “shocked there’s no former high-ranking cops on the board.”

“It’s a glaring hole — skewing the balance of experience to the left on every parole decision,” he said. “That experience is critical. Of the few in law enforcement, none have ever had to patrol a neighborhood or keep it safe.”

Hochul’s office did not return messages.

Cuomo’s spokesman Rich Azzopardi defended the ex-governor’s nominations, saying “this is an independent board whose members have a variety of backgrounds.”

“Half of our appointees had experience working in the system in places, such as a district attorney’s office, a local probation office, the federal prison system, the city corrections department or the state division of parole and were confirmed by the state Senate under both Republican and Democratic control,” he said.

“All had to go through a rigorous and exhaustive confirmation process — during which senators probe the prospective parole board member’s views and review their records and qualifications to determine their fitness to serve.” 

——————

These are the 16 members of the state Parole Board:

Tara AgostiniDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Tana Agostini, 58

Appointed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, 2017

She married to a convicted killer whose three-decade prison stint included an escape and biting off part of an inmate’s nose, according to authorities. Agostini fell in love with Thomas O’Sullivan, 57, while he was still behind bars and she worked as a staffer on the state Assembly committee overseeing the prison system. She even lobbied the parole board’s chair to back O’Sullivan’s bid for freedom — and the board paroled him in 2013. The Post exclusively revealed the couple’s secret relationship in 2018.

Darryl C. Towns, chairmanDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Darryl C. Towns, 63, chairman

Appointed by Gov. Hochul, 2023 

The former Democratic state assemblyman later served as then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s Housing Commissioner – and is the son of former Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-Brooklyn). He’s had his own run in with cops too, busted for drunk driving in Mount Vernon in 2011. His wife, Karen Boykin-Towns, is vice chair of the NAACP National Board of Directors. She also worked for 22 years for pharma giant Pfizer – where she became its first chief diversity officer in 2008.

Carlton MitchellDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Carlton Mitchell, 74 

Appointed by Cuomo, 2019

The bio on the board’s website says Mitchell worked in the non-profit sector to bring about “social transformation.” He voted in 2023 to release Edward M. Kindt, 39, who was convicted of raping and murdering a jogger in 1999 in upstate New York. Kindt encountered Penny Brown jogging on a walking trail in upstate Salamanca with her two dogs. At his hearing, he told the Parole Board he dragged her off the trail and sexually assaulted her before strangling her with one of her dog’s leashes as she fought for her life.

Erik BerlinerDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Erik Berliner, 50

Appointed by Cuomo, 2017

Berliner was previously deputy commissioner of the city Department of Correction. He has also been a consultant for organizations helping criminals in need of behavioral health services.

Michael S. CorleyDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Michael S. Corley, 55

Appointed by Cuomo, 2019

Corley is a minister at Getsemane Baptist Church in Hollis, Queens.  His bio on  the board’s web page claims he is a trained “Restorative Justice Practitioner,”  looking for ways to keep people out of jail through mediation and counseling. The site says he has also  “helped countless justice involved youth and adults,” a euphemism for criminals.

Laura El-BahtityDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Laura El-Bahtity, 51

Appointed by Hochul, 2024 

A long-time public defender, she  focused her career on indigent criminal defense, according to the DOCCS website. Most recently, she worked as a managing attorney in  Buffalo’s liberal Legal Aid Bureau, which helps criminals get out of jail. “As a public defender, she witnessed first hand the disparities and challenges her clients faced in the criminal justice system and in re-entering the community,” the website states.

Ana M. EnrightDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Ana M. Enright, 58

Appointed: Hochul 2023 

She was the state’s deputy commissioner for community supervision, where she led  state-wide parole and reentry operations. She is a graduate of John Jay College of Criminal Justice – a breeding ground for woke prosecutors.

Donna HenkenDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Donna Henken, 66 

Appointed by Hochul, 2023 

She previously worked as an assistant district attorney in the trial division of the left-leaning Manhattan DA’s office. She later joined the Legal Aid Society’s juvenile rights practice repping children in abuse and neglect cases. After that, she joined the Legal Aid Society working for the adolescent intervention and diversion team, trying to keep teens criminally charged as adults out of jail.

Erin McCabeDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Erin McCabe, 42

Appointed: Hochul 2023

She was a probation supervisor with the Erie County Probation Department, assigned to oversee officers who worked with youths. She previously worked as a probation officer for 15 years. 

Chanwoo LeeDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Chanwoo Lee, 65

Appointed: Cuomo 2019 

She was an attorney in private practice in Queens for over 25 years. She worked with the Legal Aid Society, and was a member of the city’s advisory committee on the judiciary since 2002.

Sheila SamuelsDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Sheila Samuels, Age unknown

Appointed by Cuomo, 2019 

She served as an assistant district attorney in upstate Orange County, handling cases involving narcotics and alcohol, sexual abuse, and assaults. She also assisted with the development and launch of a drug treatment court to keep criminals out of jail. 

Elsie SegarraDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Elsie Segarra, 59

Appointed by Cuomo, 2019 

She worked for probation and parole offices in Albany. As a parole officer she worked with outside agencies and law enforcement partners such as the DEA, FBI Cyber Sex Unit, ATF and the New York State Police. She is a trained polygraph examiner. 

Charles DavisDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Charles Davis, 52

Appointed by Cuomo 2017 

A licensed mental health counselor and addiction specialist who has been involved in various areas of child welfare, juvenile justice, and criminal justice, according to the state’s website. “When human beings experience trauma or severe life stressors, it is not uncommon for their lives to unravel,” his bio states in the wokest of language. “He has a great passion to bring healing to individuals adversely impacted by behavioral health challenges who are justice-involved.”

Tyece DrakeDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Tyece Drake, 52

Appointed by Cuomo, 2017

She is described on the state’s website as a mental health professional with over 20 years of experience. Her criminal justice career began with juvenile offenders but expanded to reentry services with the federal Bureau of Prisons.

Joseph CrangleDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Joseph Crangle, 57

Appointed by Gov. David Patterson, 2008; reappointed by Cuomo, 2014

A former assistant court analyst with the state Office of Court Administration, he was assigned to the Domestic Violence Part of the Buffalo City Court, where he monitored defendants’ compliance with court orders.

Marc A. CoppolaDepartment of Corrections and Community Supervision

Marc A. Coppola, 56

Appointed by Cuomo, 2012

A former Democratic state senator and majority leader of the City of Buffalo Common Council, he previously worked for five years as a legislative liaison for the Division of Parole.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/12/us-news/new-yorks-parole-board-stacked-with-lefty-cronies-earning-190k/

Might Of The Living Feds: The Need To Tackle The 1,500+ 'Zombie' Gov't Departments

by Bob Ivry, Jeremy Portnoy and RealClearInvestigations,

In 1974, Congress created the Legal Services Corporation to connect lower-income Americans involved in civil disputes with free legal help. The law that established the agency stipulated that authorization for its funding would expire in 1980, when lawmakers were required to vote on whether to keep it alive.

They never did. Still, Congress has funded LSC every year since. In fiscal 2025, its 51st year, LSC’s 135 employees will spend 95 percent of its now $560 million annual budget paying legal groups to represent Americans in cases such as eviction, domestic violence, and disputes over government benefits, according to Ron Flagg, the agency’s president since 2020.

“LSC would welcome reauthorization,” Flagg said. “We haven’t hidden from it. Every budget cycle, we go through an exhaustive process before Congress appropriates funds — dozens of meetings with leaders of both parties. We demonstrate our return on investment, how we help 2 million Americans get life-saving legal help.”

The Legal Services Corp. now stands as America’s oldest “Zombie” program, but it’s far from unique. At a time when the Trump administration is moving aggressively to scale back government, including eliminating the entire Education Department, it’s sobering to note that 1,503 agencies or programs live on despite expired authorizations, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Another 155 will expire on Sept. 30. The Zombies, nearly half of which have been officially dead for more than a decade, persist in a budgetary netherworld. In a deep dive last year, CBO analysts were able to find dollar amounts for 491 of the programs, with total expenditures of $516 billion. They don’t know how much funding the other programs received.

The total federal budget in 2024 was $6.8 trillion, meaning expired Zombie programs take up at least 8 percent of the budget, and likely much more.

A lot of programs don’t get reauthorized because Congress is okay with how they’re operating,” said Josh Huder, former congressional staffer now at the Georgetown University Government Affairs Institute. “They continue to get annual appropriations because most members think they’re worthwhile.”

Many Zombie programs now soak up far more funding than lawmakers originally envisioned. The Federal Election Commission, for example, was expected to spend $9.4 million per year before its authorization expired in 1981. Yet the agency continued to receive funding and spent $95 million in 2024, auditors at government watchdog Open The Books found. The Federal Communications Commission was originally allocated $339.6 million per year. Its funding authorization expired in 2020, yet it spent $28.4 billion last year.

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency hasn’t addressed the Zombies that are prowling the federal spreadsheets. Given DOGE’s headlong push to first root out alleged waste, fraud, and abuse and ask questions later, experts say, Zombies may offer a ripe target.

“One could imagine that if DOGE is clued into the notion of expired authorizations, they’ll think a program is defunct,” said Sarah Binder, senior fellow at Brookings and professor of political science at George Washington University. She said this would be a mistake. “If Congress is still appropriating money to the programs, they’re not Zombies. They’re living, breathing agencies.”

Binder says the fault lies not with the agencies, some of which have become important enough to be household names, but Congress. Lawmakers have made it so difficult to accomplish their most fundamental tasks, such as funding the government for another year, that they hardly ever get around to doing other important things, such as reauthorizing existing programs.

The Foreign Relations Authorization Act, for example, expired in 2003. Yet in 2024, Congress spent $38.4 billion on 24 of the law’s programs, allowing legislators to influence the White House’s foreign policy and security assistance to other nations.

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce, now led by Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY), supported the funding of 346 expired programs, more than any other committee, the CBO found. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, now chaired by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), spent more identifiable money than any other group: $153.5 billion.

“Congress’ job doesn’t stop when they allocate the money,” said Casey Burgat, professor at George Washington University’s Graduate School of Political Management. “They have to oversee it. And when they fail to do that they open themselves up to somebody else doing that. In this case, an aggressive executive branch in the form of DOGE.”

Of the 1,503 agencies or programs, 22 remain alive that required a reauthorization vote as long ago as the 1980s, according to the CBO. In addition to the Legal Services Corp., whose authorization expired in 1980, and the FEC (a 1981 reauthorization deadline), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, which oversees the country’s power grids (1984) and the Energy Information Administration, or EIA, whose data informs U.S. policymaking (1984), are among the Zombies pushing middle age.

Congress has appropriated annual funding for EIA since its inception in 1977, the agency said in an emailed statement. “Subsequent legislation has continued to direct EIA to conduct data collection, analysis and dissemination activities consistent with our mission as the nation’s premier source of energy information.” Spokespeople for the FEC, FERC, and the CBO declined to comment.

Another Zombie, the U.S. African Development Foundation—whose authorization expired in 1987—made headlines earlier this month when its officials blocked DOGE staff from entering their offices in Washington.

Congress has a history of denying or skipping reauthorizations. In the 1980s and 90s, former North Carolina Republican Sen. Jesse Helms became famous for holding up authorizations of the State Department, which he often found insufficiently vigilant against communism. The frequent flare-ups between Helms and the diplomats of State earned him the nickname “Senator No.” And NASA, the widely respected space program, recently went through periods of time when Congress funded it but didn’t reauthorize it.

The CBO’s list of 1,000-plus agencies and programs with expired reauthorization deadlines offers a window into the variety and volume of federal government activity, from grants to remove lead from drinking water and protect against radon to collecting statistics on prison rape. Lawmakers seem to be nursing a mild obsession with fish. Over the years, they’ve funded without reauthorization a herring study, for instance, and programs to help Atlantic striped bass and tuna thrive. It seems part of a larger interest in wildlife, which includes conservation programs for elephants, rhinos, and tigers and the control and eradication of the venomous brown tree snake, an invasive pest infamous for devouring a scary chunk of Guam’s bird population.

Environmental and health programs populate the list, from monitoring water quality at beaches and the Energy Star appliance program to medical care for children with asthma and funding for the National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. There are also provisions for improving airport security, protection for railroad first responders, and working capital for the Department of Homeland Security. Like a cherry on top, there’s also funding for the Office of Government Ethics.

Congress, whose 29 percent job-approval rating in February was the highest in four years, would probably “have a hard time assembling a list of programs that they’ve authorized,” said Burgat of George Washington University. “It’s a power void.”

‘Congress Doesn’t Have the Time’

‘DOGE steps into that vacuum with constitutional limitations. In 1974, Congress enacted the Impoundment Control Act, which prohibits presidents from refusing to spend the money that Congress allocates.

The Trump administration has challenged the constitutionality of the impoundment law, and DOGE is an ongoing test of the separation of powers between the legislative branch and the executive.

Authorizations and appropriations are both law,” said Brookings’ Binder. “As long as Congress is voting to spend money on these programs, it would be an impoundment to close them. It would be unconstitutional.”

To remedy the situation, Congress would have to go through the list of Zombies and decide whether to reauthorize each one, a tedious process that evidently has hovered nowhere near the top of its priority list. “Congress doesn’t have the time to do good institutional housecleaning,” Binder said. “There are a lot of little programs, but also a good deal of big ones. They don’t have the capacity to keep tabs on the authorizations.”

For now, Ron Flagg of Legal Services Corp. waits with a cautious optimism, wary about how DOGE will perceive his agency but confident that after a half century, LSC has the ability to stand up for itself.

“During the first Trump administration we got a raise in money because Congress members don’t view our work as a partisan issue,” Flagg said. “LSC has an ability to go to Congress with the facts. We publish grants, we tell you how many people were served and how many cases were closed and how technology has been advanced and how funding has been leveraged by volunteers. We’re able to make those points to Congress as part as the annual funding process.

“I’m not sure other agencies have the same ability to advocate for the quality of their work.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/might-living-feds-need-tackle-1500-zombie-govt-departments

Alzheon Alzheimer's hopes dented by trial readout

 Alzheon has been left sifting through the data of a failed Alzheimer's disease trial for crumbs of evidence that its oral therapy may have some efficacy.

The top-line results of the APOLLOE4 trial showed that valitramiprosate (ALZ-801) was unable to slow down cognitive decline in Alzheimer's patients with two copies of the APOE4 gene (homozygotes) compared to placebo.

The APOE4 allele, present in approximately 10%-15% of people, increases the risk of Alzheimer's and also lowers the age of onset. Having one copy of the gene can increase a patient's risk two- to three-fold, while two copies can increase it by 12 times.

The new data comes more than a decade after Alzheon reported negative phase 3 results with an older form of the drug called tramiprosate. Despite that setback, signals in the data in APOE4 homozygotes encouraged the company to press ahead with the clinical development of a new prodrug form of the drug – developed by Bellus Health – which has a longer half-life than its parent and can be dosed once daily.

All these years later, the APOLLOE4 study has ended in disappointment, as valitramiprosate did not meet the primary endpoint of slowing cognitive decline as assessed by the ADAS-Cog13 scale in people with early Alzheimer's and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), although the company said there was a trend towards improvement compared to placebo.

That non-statistically significant numerical advantage was the pattern for almost all the study's secondary endpoints – including other scales measuring cognitive function (CDR-SB and MMSE) and a scale measuring disability (DAD) – but the control group performed better on a measure of activities of daily living (A-IADL).

Like many Alzheimer's candidates ALZ-801 targets beta-amyloid, which forms the characteristic plaques that are seen in the brains of people who develop the disease, but works higher up the pathway than the two currently approved, antibody-based amyloid-directed drugs – Eisai/Biogen's Leqembi (lecanemab) and Eli Lilly's Kisunla (donanemab) – which have to be delivered via a needle.

The modest efficacy seen in trials of Leqembi and Kisunla cannot disguise the litany of failures in late-stage testing for earlier amyloid-targeting drugs – with dozens dropping by the wayside over the years – and, in many of those cases, companies looked to results in a subpopulation of patients as they tried to chart a way forward with their programmes.

Alzheon is considering a similar move, pointing to "nominally statistically significant and clinically meaningful cognitive benefits compared to placebo in ADAS-Cog13, as well as functional benefits, in a prespecified group of patients who could benefit from early intervention," according to its chief medical officer Susan Abushakra.

"A precision medicine approach is key to addressing the needs of Alzheimer's patients who have the APOE4/4 genotype, and we are committed to this patient population," she added.

For now, Alzheon hasn't revealed its plans for the programme but said it plans to publish the APOLLOE4 trial data in a peer-reviewed publication.

https://pharmaphorum.com/news/alzheon-alzheimers-hopes-dented-trial-readout

States Advance Fetal Rights Measures

A new Kansas law and a Florida bill outline policies backed by abortion opponents that critics see as moves toward giving embryos and fetuses the same rights

opens in a new tab or window as the women carrying them.

The Kansas Legislature's Republican supermajorities on Thursday overrode Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly's veto of a bill to require that child support payments cover embryos and fetuses and to grant an income tax break for a pregnancy or stillbirth. In Florida, lawmakers are advancing a bill that would permit parents to seek civil damages for the wrongful death of an embryo or fetus.

Following the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wadeopens in a new tab or window, anti-abortion activists across the country are pushing measures to enshrine the rights of fetuses, with the ultimate goal of ending abortion nationwideopens in a new tab or window. Lawmakers pitching the proposals describe them as support for new parents or vulnerable families.

"This bill is about being compassionate to pregnant women," Kansas Republican state Rep. Susan Humphries said Thursday.

Many States Already Give Fetuses Some Legal Rights

Pregnancy Justice, which advocates for pregnant people, found that as of last year, at least 17 states had laws on the books giving fetuses the rights of people in criminal or civil law. Also, in most states, including Florida and Kansas, a person can face criminal charges for causing the death of a fetus, other than through an abortion.

Georgia and Utah offer income tax breaks for fetuses, and Kansas will soon allow parents to claim an extra dependent child tax deduction on their personal income taxes for the year a child is born and a deduction for a stillbirth.

Also like Georgia, Kansas will start a divorced or single parent's obligation to pay child support "from the date of conception." Its new law takes effect July 1.

"It really is common sense, to provide support for women," said Republican state Sen. Kellie Warren, a supporter of the Kansas measure.

The Texas Senate approved a child support proposal earlier this month, and lawmakers introduced proposals this year in Missouri, Montana, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, according to an Associated Press analysis using the bill-tracking software Pluralopens in a new tab or window.

Allowing Wrongful Death Lawsuits to Cover Fetuses

The bill advancing in Florida would allow parents to file lawsuits over the wrongful death of an embryo or fetus at any stage of pregnancy, and juries could award monetary damages for the wages a fetus would have earned, according to the bill's sponsor.

The bill has cleared the full House and was approved by its second Senate committee Thursday, though its third and final committee hearing has yet to be scheduled.

Florida is among six states that do not allow lawsuits over the wrongful death of a fetus, according to a legislative analysis. Kansas already has a law like the one Florida is considering.

In Florida, sponsoring Republican Sen. Erin Grall told her colleagues the measure "is not about abortion."

"It's not a secret. Everybody in the room knows where I stand on life," Grall said. "To me this is about parity in our civil justice system."

Critics see both the Florida and Kansas proposals as part of an effort to move from allowing states to ban abortion -- as the Supreme Court did in its 2022 Dobbs decision -- to outlawing abortion across the nation as a violation of a fetus' or embryo's constitutional rights.

Mary Ziegler, a University of California Davis law professor who's published six books in the past 10 years on abortion law and the history of U.S. abortion policy, said this year's Florida measure aligns with a "pretty well-defined and very public playbook" to build a legal framework for a national abortion ban.

"It's about setting a precedent for recognizing fetal rights in one context being used to recognize fetal rights constitutionally," she said.

Florida considered a similar wrongful death measure last year, but it failed amid concerns about an Alabama Supreme Courtopens in a new tab or window ruling that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law. In vitro fertilization (IVF) services stopped in Alabama until that state's governor signed a law to protect themopens in a new tab or window -- a step taken in other GOP-controlled statesopens in a new tab or window.

Concerns about IVF services still linger among some lawmakers in the Florida state capital of Tallahassee, as well as among doctors and abortion rights advocates.

Democratic state Rep. Allison Tant took to the House floor to debate against the Florida bill, which she says "imperils" the fertility services that made her a mom.

"IVF pregnancies are inherently fragile and risky," Tant said. "We are going to see lawsuits like we've never seen."

Additional Bipartisan Concerns Emerge

Reproductive rights advocates in Florida also worry that wrongful death lawsuits could target healthcare providers who offer abortions, family and friends who help a loved one obtain an abortion, or fertility clinics whose clients experience a miscarriage.

In Texas, a man filed a wrongful death lawsuitopens in a new tab or window against three women he said helped his now-ex-wife obtain medication for an abortion, though he later settled the caseopens in a new tab or window.

Florida's proposal specifies that it does not authorize a cause of action against a mother for the death of her unborn child, or against a healthcare worker if they provided "lawful" medical care.

Still, Republican Sen. Tom Leek voted against the bill in committee after raising concerns about the measure potentially "being weaponized against women who lose a child."

The fear of legal action could push more ob/gyns to avoid taking on high-risk patients or stop practicing in Florida entirely, a lobbyist for a medical malpractice insurance company has argued.

"There is a serious concern that there are other motivations here behind this bill, specifically with respect to abortion, with respect to potentially IVF in the future," said Democratic Sen. Tina Polsky. "This is setting a new base for future issues, for future liability, for future bans. And it's incredibly concerning."

https://www.medpagetoday.com/obgyn/pregnancy/115077