Search This Blog

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Real ID wouldn't be needed if state systems weren't so corrupted with illegals

 


To much brouhaha, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reminded the public that "Real ID," a super-vetted form of identification, would be needed to fly airplanes in the U.S. as of May 7.

Responses ranged from legitimate civil liberties concerns, as expressed by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin:

to leftist hysteria.

The official statement from DHS is here, and is summed up by Straight Arrow News:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reminded the public Friday, April 11, to obtain a REAL ID by May 7 if they plan to fly. The new rule, which has faced nearly two decades of delays, will soon be enforced.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted a reminder on X, saying, “REAL IDs make identification harder to forge, thwarting criminals and terrorists.”

According to the DHS website, REAL ID-compliant cards feature a special marking on the upper portion. Cards lacking this marking are not REAL ID-compliant.

However, rushing to get a new driver’s license may not be necessary. If there are no immediate travel plans, the current driver’s license remains valid for driving. Likewise, the TSA has listed acceptable identifications for airport checkpoints, including passports, passport cards and Global Entry cards.

Before visiting the DMV, ensure you have the correct paperwork. Many DMV offices are accepting appointments. Married women applying for a REAL ID will likely need a certified copy of their marriage certificate to prove a legal name change. Additionally, a birth certificate or passport is typically required for primary proof of identity. Some states may also require certified copies of previous marriage certificates if the name has changed multiple times.

Aside from airports, REAL IDs will also be required at certain federal facilities and nuclear power plants, according to DHS.

DHS notes that the law was passed in 2005 as a result of 9/11, and many states have already enacted it, so it probably won't be that disruptive to most.

It is also full of disclaimers about this being a national ID card or database of all people.

But is that really such a bad thing? Most countries do have national identification cards so it's not as though this is particularly Orwellian.

And actually, it does look like a necessary need for verifying people, because state drivers license systems are so corrupted with the issuance of these licenses to illegal immigrants, that as ID, it's largely meaningless in some states, and reasonably intact in others.

Why Noem chose to get this completed after all her predecessors ignored it may be simply that she gets things done.

But it also may be setting the stage for finding ways to eliminate voter fraud by illegal immigrants and assorted scammers. Use this as a basis for voting and it can only improve the troubled and fraud-filled voter databases that fill blue state voter rolls.

I have a natural aversion to this sort of seemingly intrusive verification of names and federalization of data. But so much scamming has been going on in the state systems that they are untrustworthy in many places. Maybe this is the base move for creating a national voting ID to end fraud in elections.

If so, I am all for this, or at least willing to go along, even with the inconvenience and potential for abuse. I could change my mind as more information comes out, but for now, maybe it should be tried.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/04/real_id_wouldn_t_be_needed_if_state_systems_weren_t_so_corrupted_with_illegals.html

Israeli Military Admits Hamas Still Has 75% of Tunnels Intact & 40,000 Fighters

 Via The Libertarian Institute 

Israeli military sources speaking to the press revealed the lack of progress Tel Aviv has made toward one of its core goals in Gaza: eliminating Hamas. The armed wing of the Palestinian group reportedly retains 75% of its tunnel network, 40,000 fighters and the ability to produce its own weapons.

According to Haaretz, an Israeli defense official explained that Hamas still has significant military capabilities despite 18 months of fighting in the Strip. Israeli military analysts now estimate that Hamas has 40,000 fighters.

Before October 7, 2023, Hamas was estimated to have between 20,000 and 30,000 fighters under arms. Near the end of the Joe Biden administration, the US intelligence community estimated the group had lost 15,000 men during the Israeli onslaught, but had recruited the same number of new troops.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that one of his top goals in Gaza is to eradicate Hamas. However, the war has decimated the civilian population of Gaza.

Most Gazans have been displaced multiple times, at least 50,000 have been killed - per Palestinian health sources - and countless deaths of deprivation have been reported.

Tel Aviv and Washington maintain that all of the fatalities caused by the Israeli war and blockade are the responsibility of Hamas.

The Israeli defense officials reported that despite some protests, Hamas retains its popularity and is firmly in charge of Gaza. Its armed wing, the al-Qassam Brigades, still has the capability to produce arms and rockets.

Last week, Hamas fired several rockets into Israel, leaving one person injured.

While Hamas has a significant fighting force, Israeli officials said the militants have not been engaging with Israeli troops. Tel Aviv says the fighters are hiding among civilians or in tunnels.

Hamas also retains a significant portion of its tunnel network. The officials said the IDF has only managed to destroy 25% of the group’s underground facilities so far. Defense Minister Israel Katz explained that some of the tunnels connecting Gaza with Egypt remain intact.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/israeli-military-admits-hamas-still-has-75-tunnels-intact-40000-fighters

UK takes control of British Steel under emergency powers

 The UK government is taking control of Chinese-owned British Steel after emergency legislation was rushed through Parliament in a single day.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds told MPs the government's likely next step would be to nationalise the Scunthorpe plant, which employs 2,700 people.

But he said he was forced to seek emergency powers to prevent owners Jingye shutting down its two blast furnaces, which would have ended primary steel production in the UK.

MPs and peers were called back from their Easter holidays to debate the legislation in an extremely rare Saturday sitting of both houses of Parliament. It has now received Royal Assent after being passed by the Commons and Lords.PA Media Sir Keir Starmer met steelworkers at a village hall near the Scunthorpe plant

PA Media
Sir Keir Starmer met steelworkers at a village hall near the Scunthorpe plant

The BBC understands UK government officials are at the Scunthorpe site ready to take control of operations.

After the legislation was given royal assent, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "Today, my government has stepped in to save British steel.

"We are acting to protect the jobs of thousands of workers, and all options are on the table to secure the future of the industry."

He said steel made in Britain "will be the backbone as we get Britain building once more," adding: "Our industry is the pride of our history – and I want it to be our future, too."

Speaking to steelworkers earlier on Saturday at a village hall near Scunthorpe, Sir Keir said: "You are the people who have kept this going."

It came as several hundred people, including steelworkers and their families, took part in a march and a rally at Scunthorpe United's Glanford Park stadium, chanting "we want our steel back".

British Steel worker Rob Barroclough told the BBC: "Our family, like many others, is built around the steelworks. Who knows... my boys might end up working there one day, if it can be saved."

He added: "We're hoping for the best but planning for the worst."

Meanwhile, it has emerged that police were called to the steel works this morning after a suspected breach of the peace.

Jingye officials have been on-site regularly in recent days, and it's thought that relations between them and the workers have become increasingly tense.

Sources told BBC News that when Jingye executives arrived at the plant this morning, the automatic number plate recognition scanners didn't allow them through the site barriers.

Humberside Police said officers conducted checks and spoke to individuals but that there were no concerns raised and no arrests were made.

The legislation going through Parliament was not resisted by opposition parties – but the Conservatives said the government should have acted sooner and made "a total pig's breakfast of this whole arrangement".

The new law hands Reynolds sweeping powers to control management and workers at the plant to ensure production continues, including entering it by force, if necessary, to secure assets.

But Jingye will retain ownership of it for now.

The government remains hopeful it can secure private investment to save the loss-making plant, but ministers concede there are currently no companies willing to make an offer.

In the Commons, Reynolds acknowledged that public ownership was "the likely option".

He said the government would "pay the fair market rate" to shareholders in the event of nationalisation but added: "In this case the market value is effectively zero."

Keeping a loss-making plant open could come at a high cost to taxpayers.

But Reynolds insisted it was in the "national interest" to retain the ability to make steel from scratch and he believed the company had a future, particularly as the government was boosting infrastructure spending.

"Steel is fundamental to Britain's industrial strength, to our security, and to our identity as a primary global power", he told MPs.

He said he had been forced to take over the running of the plant because Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, had rejected the government's offers to buy raw materials to keep the blast furnaces running.

"Despite our offer to Jingye being substantial, they wanted much more. Frankly, an excessive amount. We did however remain committed to negotiation.

"But over the last few days, it became clear that the intention of Jingye was to refuse to purchase sufficient raw material to keep the blast furnaces running, in fact, their intention was to cancel and refuse to pay for existing orders.

"The company would therefore have irrevocably and unilaterally closed down primary steel making at British Steel."

'Transformation'

Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice urged the government to "show your cojones" and go further by fully nationalising British Steel "this weekend".

Several Conservative MPs also spoke in favour of nationalisation. Liberal Democrat Treasury spokeswoman Daisy Cooper said recalling Parliament had been "absolutely the right thing to do" but urged ministers to use the "unprecedented legislation judiciously".

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, now an independent MP, urged the government to nationalise all steelmaking in the UK.

Green MP Ellie Chowns said steel is integral to the "green industrial transformation" - including making wind turbines, trains and tracks - and nationalisation would give the UK the control it needs to renew the industry.

The government came under fire for acting to save the Scunthorpe plant but not taking the same action when the Tata Steel works in Port Talbot was threatened with closure.

Plaid Cymru's Westminster leader Liz Saville Robert said it was a "bitter day for the people of Port Talbot", as she urged the government to change the legislation to take control of what is left of the steelworks there.

The SNP's Westminster leader Stephen Flynn asked why the legislation only applies to England, when a Scottish oil refinery is facing closure.

"Why is this not being extended to Scotland? Why is Grangemouth not being included?" he asked Reynolds, adding the UK government was "not interested in Scotland".

Reynolds said Grangemouth was "not comparable" with the situation at Scunthorpe, which he said was "unique".

"The question for all members is whether we as a country want to continue to possess a steel industry, do we want to make the construction steel and rail we need here in the UK, or do we want to be dependent on overseas imports?" he told MPs.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg17g39x41o

'HHS officials did not know how many people have been fired'

 Department of Health and Human Services officials during a closed-door briefing could not give a full accounting of the number of people who have been fired from the agency, a Democratic aide for the House Energy and Commerce Committee said Friday.

HHS officials insisted to committee staff that the agency’s massive staffing cuts had been performed “with a scalpel” and “with nuance” but they did not have any numbers of who had been laid off, the aide told reporters.

“There did not seem to be a function level understanding of who had been terminated,” they added.

The briefing was held because members from both parties have indicated they were caught off guard by the sudden decision to cut as many as 10,000 workers from the health agency and have been asking for answers about the full scope of the effort.

Democrats on the committee are demanding HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. answer their questions in person at a hearing. They are concerned the agency’s core functions are being put at risk by the sweeping layoffs.

A Democratic aide on Friday said Kennedy may testify by June about the agency’s budget proposal, but they were told by HHS officials he would not be able to answer questions about the staffing reductions for 60 days, due to an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) statute.

“It’ll be very interesting if he does try to slide in here … on day 58 and cites that as a reason that he can’t [talk about layoffs],” the aide said. “That is not consistent with the new era of transparency that has been promised.”

HHS has set a June 2 deadline to complete the cuts, including re-hiring anyone who may have been laid off by mistake. Kennedy said in a recent interview there could be up to 20 percent of the workforce who were mistakenly terminated and could be brought back.

But agency officials Friday told the committee staff they were not aware of any such plan and were only going to bring people back on a “case by case basis,” per a Democratic aide in attendance.  

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5245999-hhs-officials-lack-clarity-sweeping-layoffs/

Biden’s administration may have suppressed COVID evidence contradicting Chinese claims

 Imagine a world war that left more than seven million dead, hundreds of millions became ill, wrecked the global economy, and left a generation with lasting psychological and developmental injuries.

We have seen such wars in history. What is different in this circumstance, however, is that all of that happened, and yet, years later, we still have no agreement on the original cause or possible culprits behind a pandemic that ravaged the world.

Worse yet, many politicians, experts and journalists do not seem inclined to find the answers.

This is like fighting World War II and then shrugging off the question of what actually started it.

New questions are being raised over long-withheld evidence on the origins of COVID, information that contradicted the accounts of not just the Biden administration but also allies in academia and the media.

The Chinese first reported the outbreak in December 2019 and insisted that it came from a wet market in Wuhan — a natural or “zoonotic” transfer from bats sold at the market. Others were skeptical and pointed to the nearby Wuhan government virus lab, known to have conducted coronavirus studies with bats. This lab had a history of safety and contamination concerns.

The “lab-leak theory,” which was always the most obvious explanation, was further reinforced by scientists who saw evidence of possible manipulation of the virus’s genetic code, particularly the “spike protein” that enables the virus to enter the human body in a “gain of function” operation.

There was (and still is) a serious controversy over the origins of the virus, but any debate was quickly scuttled in favor of the natural theory.

The Chinese immediately moved to crush any speculation of a lab-leak. Wuhan scientists were gagged and the Chinese refused to allow international investigators access to them or the lab in question. The Chinese also used their considerable influence over the World Health Organization and other groups to dismiss or downplay the lab theory..

Now, a long-withheld military report has finally been released by the Trump administration. It appears to confirm what was once denied by the Biden administration: U.S. military service members contracted COVID-19-like symptoms after participating in the World Military Games in October 2019 in Wuhan.

That contradicts China’s timeline. It suggests a longer cover-up in that country, which allowed the virus to spread not only to the U.S. but to countries around the world. Other nations also reported that their military personnel had fallen ill after attending the same games, suggesting that the virus was not only spreading but already raging in the area at that time.

The most disturbing aspect of this report is not the alleged conduct of the Chinese government, but that of our own.

Rumors of U.S. military personnel coming down with the virus had long been out there. Republicans in Congress repeatedly asked the Biden administration about any report on the outbreak.

Then-Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby told The Washington Post in June 2021 that the military had “no knowledge” of COVID-19 infections among the troops participating in those games.

Even as the illness associated with the games became known, the Biden administration repeatedly refused to confirm the U.S. cases, and a 2022 report was withheld from both Congress and the public.

If true, the level of duplicity and dishonesty is shocking. In the U.S. alone, more than 1.2 million died and more than 111 million were made sick by this virus. Yet the Biden administration is accused of withholding this information from the world. Why?

This disclosure follows an equally troubling disclosure that scientists in the Biden administration actually found support for the lab theory but were silenced by their superiors. 

Last December, the Wall Street Journal released an alarming report on how these scientists supported the lab theory on the origin of the COVID-19 virus. Not only were the FBI and its top experts excluded from a critical briefing of Biden, but government scientists were reportedly warned that they were “off the reservation” in supporting the lab theory.

As scientists were being attacked publicly and blacklisted for supporting the lab theory, experts at both the FBI and the Energy Department found the lab theory credible. Although no theory could be proven conclusively, it was deemed a more likely scenario than the natural-origin theory. The CIA also found the lab theory credible.

What the public was hearing was entirely different. They were hearing the same narrative laid out by the Chinese government in December 2019.

The Chinese relied upon western scientists to form a mob against anyone raising the lab-leak theory as a possible explanation. Many were enlisted to sign letters or publish statements denouncing the idea. It became an article of faith — a required virtue signal among university scientists.

The western media were equally primed to quash the theory. 

After President Trump embraced the lab theory, the Chinese had the perfect setup. The media was on a hair-trigger in opposition and denounced his comments as not only unfounded but also racist. MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace mocked Trump and others for spreading “conspiracy theories.” MSNBC’s Kasie Hunt insisted that “we know it’s been debunked that this virus was manmade or modified.”

MSNBC’s Joy Reid called the lab leak theory “debunked bunkum.” Over at CNN, reporter Drew Griffin criticized the “widely debunked” theory and host Fareed Zakaria told viewers that “the far right has now found its own virus conspiracy theory” in the lab leak.

The Washington Post was particularly dogmatic. After Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) raised the lab-leak theory, he was chastised for “repeat[ing] a fringe theory suggesting that the ongoing spread of a coronavirus is connected to research in the disease-ravaged epicenter of Wuhan, China.”

The Post’s “fact checker” Glenn Kessler mocked Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) for entertaining the theory. “I fear @tedcruz missed the scientific animation in the video that shows how it is virtually impossible for this virus to jump from the lab,” he posted. “Or the many interviews with actual scientists. We deal in facts, and viewers can judge for themselves.”

Even in 2021 when countervailing evidence was surfacing, the unrelenting attacks continued. New York Times science and health reporter Apoorva Mandavilli urged journalists not to mention the “racist” lab theory.

Social media companies also enforced the narrative and, with the coordination of the Biden Administration, experts raising the lab theory were targeted, censored, and blacklisted.

It now appears that the COVID outbreak may have occurred months before the alleged wet market release — months that could have been used to contain the virus. Instead, China is accused of suppressing the news and allowing the virus to spread worldwide. Our military personnel alone went home from the Wuhan games to 25 states, potentially carrying it with them.

When information on these infections connected to the games was reported around the world, China even suggested that the U.S. used the games to release the weaponized virus.

In 2020, I wrote a column on why China seemed poised to avoid any liability for what might be the greatest act of negligence in history. The sheer size of the disaster somehow seemed to insulate China. As Joseph Stalin had once said, “a single death is a tragedy” and “a million deaths is a statistic.”

Try more than seven million, and you have a statistic that was not worth confronting the Chinese over. What was done was done.

Congress and the Trump administration are now working to reconstruct this record. There is much that we still do not know. However, the public has already paid dearly for the answers. We have more than a million questions, and not one of them is a statistic to those who loved them.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.

https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/5245895-covid-origins-cover-up/

Democrats rail against Apple after Trump unveils electronic tariff exemption

 Democrats slammed the Trump administration for allegedly favoring sector-specific companies by giving them the ability to bypass the fallout from new trade policy with a Saturday exemption of electronics from “reciprocal” tariffs imposed on countries across the globe, including China.

Smartphones, computers, routers and semiconductor chips were all excluded from the president’s heightened taxes, leaving room for companies like Apple, which has a host of plants in China, to escape an uptick in price costs for consumers amid the onset of new tariffs.

“Apple CEO Tim Cook donated $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration. Looks like he’s getting a big return on his investment,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) wrote in a Saturday post after learning of the news. 

Cook donated $1 million to President Trump’s inaugural fund, as did Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. 

The Apple CEO also met with the Republican candidate at Mar-a-Lago a month prior to his return to the White House showing signs of a budding relationship between the two.

In April, Trump announced a 10 percent baseline tariff on nearly all foreign imports in an effort to boost American manufacturing, however, economists have said the tax might knock the growth of the country’s small business owners.

“Trump’s on-and-off-again tariffs leave the door wide open for billionaire corporations to suck up for corrupt deals — while leaving small businesses, farmers, and families out in the cold,” Warren wrote in a subsequent post, urging Congress to “rein in” the president’s tariff authority. 

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) echoed Warren’s concerns, alleging that Apple may be receiving special treatment after announcing in February that it plans to spend more than $500 billion in the United States and hire more than 20,000 people over the next several years.

“The tariffs are just a regime to reward big businesses like Apple that can make giant contributions to Trump. Tim Cook gave $1 million to Trump for his inauguration,” the lawmaker wrote in a Saturday post

Democratic Senators introduced a measure seeking to check Trump’s trade authority as policies fluctuate daily. GOP legislators signed on in support of the Trade Review Act of 2025 with hopes of mitigating uncertainty for the American people.

House Democrats may be looking to take a similar form of recourse after the Trump administration’s Saturday announcement left concerns of impropriety.

“Apple CEO Tim Cook gave Trump $1 million for his inauguration. So while working families pay more, Apple gets special treatment,” Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) wrote in a post online, referencing Saturday’s exemptions.

“Trump gets bribes. Billionaires get special treatment. Working people get screwed,” he added. 

The Hill reached out to the White House and Apple for comment.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5246353-democrats-rail-against-apple-after-trump-unveils-electronic-tariff-exemption/