Search This Blog

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

CMS Prepares for Third Cycle of Drug Price Negotiations

 

The third cycle of the drug price negotiations will involve drugs under Medicare Part B. New prices are set to take effect in 2028.

The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will name the next 15 drugs to undergo price negotiations by February 1, 2026, the agency revealed on Monday.

The announcement immediately followed President Donald Trump’s signing of an executive order to revive his Most Favored Nation (MFN) policy, which seeks to lower drug costs and “to bring prices for American patients in line with comparably developed nations,” according to the document. Within 30 days of signing the MFN order, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz, should communicate these new prices to drugmakers.

The CMS on Monday released draft guidance for the third cycle of drug price negotiations under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which will now include drugs payable through Medicare Part B, which mostly refers to services like outpatient care, doctors’ fees and certain tests, but also includes certain drugs given as part of these services, like cancer medicines that are usually not self-administered. In contrast, the first and current rounds of negotiations have only involved Part D, which covers brand-name and generic prescription drugs. The new prices for the next 15 drugs will go into effect in 2028.

The drug negotiation program empowers the CMS to haggle with pharma companies, looking to bring down the maximum fair prices of some of the most widely prescribed prescription drugs.

Of note, the draft document also outlines guidelines the CMS will use in choosing certain drugs eligible for negotiation. Medicines that have already been negotiated but have had added indications and changes in monopoly status, for instance, could be up for renegotiation, with new prices to take effect in 2028. Changes in cost of production and distribution changes since the previous negotiation would not be considered grounds for renegotiation.

The second cycle of the negotiations is ongoing and includes some of the industry’s top-selling drugs, such as Novo Nordisk’s obesity and diabetes drugs Wegovy and Ozempic, GSK’s asthma therapy Trelegy Ellipta and Bristol Myers Squibb’s multiple myeloma medicine Pomalyst. CMS has until June 1 to make its initial offer to drugmakers, which will then accept or file their counteroffer. The final agreed-upon prices will be implemented in 2027.

When Trump won the presidential election last year, the pharma industry was optimistic that he would usher in a pro-industry administration. BMO Capital Markets analysts at the time said that a Trump presidency could be a “modest positive” for the industry, while analysts from Mizuho and Leerink noted the potential for a regulatory environment more accommodating of business combinations.

Trump appeared to make good on this projection last month, indicating in an executive order aimed at lowering drug prices the potential for a change to the so-called “pill penalty,” which gives small molecules only a 9-year window free of Medicare price negotiations compared with the 13-year window afforded biologics.

The latest drug pricing update also comes at a time of tumult in the overall microenvironment. In February, for instance, Kennedy kicked off a sweeping reorganization of HHS, which involved some 3,500 layoffs at the Food and Drug Administration—cuts some have argued could cripple the regulator.

Trump has also threatened the pharma industry with “major” tariffs, which he says could encourage companies to reshore their manufacturing operations. Last month, his Commerce Department opened a national security probe on pharma imports, the results of which could prompt Trump to impose certain trade restrictions on these products.

https://www.biospace.com/policy/cms-prepares-for-third-cycle-of-drug-negotiations-as-trump-intensifies-push-to-lower-prices

Trump’s Most Favored Nation Policy Sparks PBM Selloff

 

The Most Favored Nation directive would allow drugmakers to directly sell their products to patients at a lower cost, cutting out what President Donald Trump called “the middlemen.”

Stocks of pharmacy benefit managers took a beating after President Donald Trump unveiled his Most Favored Nation (MFN) policy—a move he claims would lower drug prices by at least 50%.

A core tenet of Trump’s MFN directive is enabling “direct-to-consumer” sales of drugs, according to the Executive Order he signed on Monday. “We’re going to cut out the middlemen and facilitate the direct sale of drugs at the most favored nation price directly to the American citizen,” the president said at the executive order signing event at the White House.

“I don’t know who they [the middlemen] are but they’re rich,” Trump said at the event.

This announcement came as a blow to these so-called “middlemen”—pharmacy benefit managers that coordinate between drugmakers and patients. According to reporting from Reuters, shares of CVS Health, which owns CVS Caremark, dropped 5% on the MFN news, while Cigna, parent of PBM Express Scripts, lost 6%. UnitedHealth Group, which owns OptumRx, dipped 0.5%.

Trump’s executive order tasks Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. with establishing a “mechanism through which” patients can directly source their medicines from manufacturers. It is not clear when Kennedy is expected to implement this mechanism or how he plans to do so.

In a statement to Reuters, Greg Lopes, spokesperson for Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, a trade group representing PBMs, again put the blame of high drug prices on the pharma companies. PBMs, according to Lopes, are the only check to drugmakers’ control over medicine pricing, Reuters reported.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for CVS, speaking to Reuters, said the company will engage with the government to figure out ways to make drug prices more affordable for patients.

PBMs have long been criticized as a key driving force behind the rise in drug prices. In July 2024, under former chairperson Lina Khan, the Federal Trade Commission released a scathing report detailing how six of the largest players have come to manage some 95% of all prescription drugs in the U.S., in turn hiking their costs.

In January, another report from the FTC found that the three biggest PBMs—CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and OptumRx—inflated drug prices by hundreds and thousands of percents, raising their revenues by $7.3 billion.

PBMs, however, have long maintained that it’s the drugmakers that are at fault for drug prices. In a congressional hearing in July 2024, executives from Caremark, Express Scripts and OptumRx said that pharma companies engage in anti-competitive practices to keep the prices of products high, while PBMs help promote competition.

“Brand products with little to no competition remain the chief source of rising drug costs,” CVS Caremark president David Joyner said at the time.

https://www.biospace.com/policy/trumps-most-favored-nations-policy-sparks-pbm-selloff

Galapagos Takes Dramatic U-Turn, Ditching Spinout Plan, Cell Therapy and CEO

 

It’s another wild twist in the story of Galapagos, a company that has been around for more than 25 years but has yet to get a therapy approved.

After some additional thought and market developments, Galapagos is reversing course on a series of plans that involved spinning out a portion of the company and finding a new CEO over the next year. Paul Stoffels will still exit the company, just sooner than expected. And the Belgian biotech will explore the potential sale of a clutch of cell therapy assets, which Stoffels brought into the company’s fold through a series of acquisitions over the past three years.

It’s another wild twist in the story of Galapagos. The company, which has been around for more than a quarter century, has yet to get a therapy approved. A series of clinical failures stacked up before Stoffels took the helm in 2022 and promised a turnaround in five years. But his departure was announced two years shy of that timeframe, and now, it seems, the company is abandoning what Stoffels built and sending the former Johnson & Johnson exec out the door early.

Stoffels is to be replaced as CEO of Galapagos by Henry Gosebruch, who had been appointed CEO of the new spinout company in April. Stoffels has also been replaced as chair of the Galapagos board by Jérôme Contamine, but he will remain involved in an advisory capacity, specifically focused on finding a home for the company’s cell therapy assets.

The strategy is an about-face from plans announced in early January—a move triggered by unspecificed “regulatory and market developments,” Galapagos said in a Tuesday release. Instead of spinning out a new company with $2.5 billion in capital to execute deals for new assets, Galapagos will conduct “transformative business development transactions” in house while exploring strategic alternatives for the cell therapy assets that it had previously planned to keep under the company banner.

The spinout had been expected to be completed mid-year, and Galapagos had already taken strides toward the reorganization. But with about a month and a half to go until the end of the second quarter, Gosebruch will now be in charge of leading the strategic process to evaluate Galapagos’ existing assets and use the resources previously earmarked for the spinout to build a new pipeline via business development.

“We are currently evaluating strategic options regarding our clinical programs and other assets,” new CEO Gosebruch said in a statement. “I look forward to working with Paul [Stoffels] in finding a value-maximizing alternative for the cell therapy business including exploring mergers, divestures, and out-licensing. In parallel, we will pursue transformative business development opportunities in order to build an innovative pipeline with the potential to deliver differentiated medicines for patients.”

Among the cell therapy assets Stoffels is house hunting for are Galapagos’ lead program GLPG5101 and the company’s decentralized cell therapy manufacturing platform. The GLPG5101 program spanned a handful of B cell blood cancers, including mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The most advanced was a Phase II clinical trial for follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma.

https://www.biospace.com/business/galapagos-takes-dramatic-u-turn-ditching-spinout-plan-cell-therapy-and-ceo-stoffels

Trump Not Going To Istanbul, As Kremlin Downplays 'Direct' Ukraine Peace Talks

 The Kremlin on Tuesday affirmed that "the Russian side continues to prepare for the negotiations that are scheduled to take place on Thursday." This after on Sunday Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to resume direct negotiations with Kiev, and proposed the Istanbul talks.

Ukrainian President Zelensky then made a performative gesture - likely more meant to prove to the White House that he's 'willing' - saying he's ready to fly to Istanbul in person and urged Putin to do the same.

Putin spokesman Dimitry Peskov when grilled by reporters on Tuesday downplayed the whole event, describing that direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul later this week are merely "still possible".

As for revealing the line-up for the Russian delegation, and who is expected lead, Peskov said "we will announce it as soon as the president [Putin] deems it necessary."

Despite some sensational recent headlines and statements, one thing we can be sure will not happen is President Putin's personal presence. And per the latest from Reuters, President Trump is not going to be there in Turkey either (after on Monday he actually floated the possibility):

  • KELLOGG, WITKOFF ARE HEADING TO ISTANBUL THIS WEEK: REUTERS
  • FORMAT OF TALKS IN TURKEY WITH KELLOGG, WITKOFF UNCLEAR: REUTERS

"All of us in Ukraine would appreciate it if President Trump could be there with us at this meeting in Turkey. This is the right idea. We can change a lot," Zelensky had said.

And Trump had responded by saying he was "thinking about actually flying over" – which would have to happen immediately on the heels of his big Gulf visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and UAE.

Zelensky has meanwhile insisted that any talks should be preceded by the start of a 30-day ceasefire – which Washington appears to be backing, but which the Kremlin has already rejected.

Really, all the talk of pushing to get Putin in Istanbul to negotiate in person was about generating mainstream media headlines like the following:

Moscow worries that such a lengthy pause in fighting would only be used by Ukrainian forces to rearm and regroup along the front lines, at a moment they are exhausted and steadily losing ground.

Peskov told reporters further, "[Western] Europe is, after all, entirely on Ukraine’s side. It cannot claim to have an unbiased approach… Its approach is not balanced, it is rather pro-war, aimed at continuing the fighting, which is in sharp contrast to the approach demonstrated, for example, by Moscow or Washington," according to Russian media.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-not-going-istanbul-kremlin-downplays-istanbul-talks-ukraine

WH Correspondents Seethe Over 'New Media' Policies, Lack Of Wire Reporters On Air Force One

 Legacy media representatives are frustrated and angry over the Trump administration's new media policy, and the fact that mainstream outlets like The Associated Press are still in some cases being frozen out of key events and Trump trips.

The AP is highlighting Tuesday that "The group representing White House journalists said Monday it was disturbed that the Trump administration barred any wire service news reporters from traveling with the president on Air Force One to the Middle East."

"No reporters from The Associated Press, Bloomberg, or Reuters was on the plane, where presidents often take questions from traveling members of the press," the report underscores.

The White House has been at loggerheads with the Associated Press over the US-based news agency's decision to not change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America, as Trump had called for in an executive order. Trump is reportedly soon to announce another change - from Persian Gulf to Gulf of Arabia - a longtime wish of Washington's Gulf Arab allies, and a poke at Iran.

The White House has meanwhile been implementing something historic and unprecedented with its new media policy, finally allowing independent and alternative sources, and non-traditional mediums to report from the White House, including of course ZeroHedge...

New media outlets are also actually being given the opportunity to rotate in for space on Air Force One, official events at Mar-a-Lago, and other locations where Trump gives briefings and remarks.

Naturally, we only welcome this and any and all policies which in effect break the MSM's stranglehold over political narratives as the conventional 'gatekeepers'. 

To review, a few short years ago US intelligence under the Biden administration targeted ZeroHedge, accusing us of 'mis-/mal-/dis-information' for what was in reality us merely taking an independent, critical view of Washington policy regarding the Russia-Ukraine war and the Covid-19 pandemic.

Stillframe via YouTube

We were promptly smeared, de-monetized by Google, briefly banned on Twitter (now X) and generally sneered at by the mainstream commentariat, with accompanying ill-informed hit pieces.

But we took this as a badge of honor, given we simply asked questions which the majority of non-DC beltway normal middle Americans, wanted to know. And we plan to continue, more fiercely than ever, but this time from just in front of the presidential podium.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/wh-correspondents-seethe-over-new-media-policies-lack-wire-reporters-air-force-one

Germany Stops Spying On AfD Party After US Pressure

 Via Remix News,

Germany’s domestic spy agency has suspended authoritarian surveillance methods of the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, and U.S. pressure may have played a role.

The German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), the country’s powerful domestic spy agency, had labeled the AfD a “confirmed far-right organization” before suspending this designation last week. The main reason presented was that the AfD is appealing the designation in court and the agency would wait until this appeal is concluded to decide whether to keep the designation.

However, Germany’s ally, the United States, immediately criticized the designation in some of the harshest language possible, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling it “tyranny in disguise.” That was not all, though. U.S. Senator Tom Cotton, chairman of the powerful U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, then asked Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard (DNI) to suspend intelligence cooperation between the United States and Germany.

According to Cotton, the German authorities’ politically motivated surveillance activities resemble methods used by dictatorships that are unbecoming of a democratic ally.

“Rather than trying to undermine the AfD using the tools of authoritarian states, Germany’s incoming government might be better advised to consider why the AfD continues to gain electoral ground,” he wrote.

This would have represented a drastic break between the two allies and even a threat to Germany’s national security, which raised the stakes in Germany’s authoritarian move to stifle the political opposition. Currently, the AfD is the largest opposition party in the country and for the first time ever, polled in first place last month.

The developments have also caused a major stir in Germany. Alice Weidel, co-chair of the AfD, said American pressure was behind the BfV’s withdrawal of its designation label on the AfD. In addition, Joachim Steinhöfel, a lawyer defending freedom of speech, told NIUS that the move by the BfV is “a complete surrender by the German domestic intelligence service.” He also noted that U.S. influence was vital.

“We also have to thank the Americans for exerting massive pressure,” he added.

Germany often relies on external partners to spy on its own citizens, as Germany features very strict privacy laws. The NSA is thought to be especially active watching Germans. As a result, any U.S. withdrawal from intelligence sharing could have been disastrous for Germany.

The temporary removal of the designation was warmly welcomed by the AfD, as it gives the party breathing room. For one, a vote on the ban of the party has little chance of moving forward without the designation. Second, the designation offered the BfV the legal means to surveil the entire party and its membership without a warrant, including reading emails and chats, as well as flood the party with informants.

Now, German intelligence is being forced to rethink its surveillance policy as political divisions grow. However, if the appeal court agrees with the BfV that the AfD can be labeled right-wing extremist, the same issue may rear its head again. It is unclear how long this appeals process will take, whether months or even years; however, there is a growing chorus from Germany’s left, as well as the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), to ban the entire AfD party.

If that happens, tensions between the U.S. and Germany could soar to new heights.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/complete-surrender-germany-stops-spying-afd-party-after-us-pressure

Affimed Filing for the Opening of Insolvency Proceedings

 Affimed N.V. (Nasdaq: AFMD), a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company committed to giving patients back their innate ability to fight cancer, today announced its decision to file an application for opening of insolvency proceedings with the local court of Mannheim in Germany.

As previously reported, Affimed N.V. (the “Company”) has been engaged in discussions with potential investors and partners with respect to potential strategic transactions to raise additional capital. Despite its continuous and ongoing fundraising efforts, the Company has not been able to raise sufficient additional funds to continue the operations of the Company and its controlled (and wholly owned) subsidiaries Affimed GmbH and Affimed Inc. Further, based on currently available information, the Company’s liquidity condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

As a consequence, the members of the management board of the Company have determined in respect of the Company and the managing directors of Affimed GmbH have determined in respect of Affimed GmbH that the companies are overindebted (Überschuldung). The management of the Company and the management of Affimed GmbH have determined with regards to the respective company that they must file for insolvency under German law.

Following such determination, on May 13, 2025, the members the management board of the Company filed for the opening of ordinary insolvency proceedings over the assets of the Company and the managing directors of Affimed GmbH filed for the opening of ordinary insolvency proceedings over the assets of Affimed GmbH with the local court of Mannheim in Germany. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of any preliminary or formal insolvency proceedings with respect to the Company or Affimed GmbH or as to whether the companies will emerge from insolvency as a going concern. Further, the insolvency filing in respect of the Company and resulting preliminary and formal insolvency proceedings will also result in the Company’s common shares being suspended from trading on, and subsequent delisting from, The Nasdaq Global Market.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/05/13/3080104/0/en/Affimed-Announces-Filing-for-the-Opening-of-Insolvency-Proceedings.html