Search This Blog

Thursday, June 19, 2025

NYC in $1B no-bid shelter contract with hotels on 86K migrants, homeless, claims 'crisis easing'

 The Adams administration has inked a nearly $1 billion no-bid contract with the hotel industry for emergency shelter space — despite boasting that the migrant crisis is tapering off, The Post has learned.

Taxpayers are on the hook for the $929.1 million reupped with the Hotel Association of New York City Foundation as the total city population still includes a whopping 86,000 people, including homeless individuals and asylum seekers.

“These hotel units will be used by social services vendors to house emergency shelter clients who have entered the [Department of Homeless Services] shelter system,” the agency said in a notice posted Wednesday.

The Adams administration has signed a $1 billion no-bid contract with the hotel industry for emergency shelter space .Robert Miller

The reupped contract took effect in January and runs through June 30, 2026. It was awarded via “negotiated acquisition” – meaning it was not put out for competitive bids. The initial contract was negotiated through the end of 2025, as previously reported by The Post.

The move is a head-scratcher, said Nicole Gelinas, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

“Why do we need to be using so many hotels for day to day homeless management?,” Gelinas said. “This is turning an emergency program into a permanent program and taking a block of hotel rooms off the tourist market while people complain the city’s hotel room costs are so high.”

Gelinas said the city should have made hotels bid against each other instead of treating the hospitality industry “as a monopoly” with a sole source contract.

Under the new contract, it’s up to the Hotel Association as a “fiscal agent” of the program to connect the city with hotels that are willing to set aside rooms to shelter homeless individuals and families in exchange for rental payments.

The deal comes as the shelter at the Roosevelt Hotel is set to end next week.William C Lopez/New York Post

The overall cost to house migrants per night is $352 — including $130 to hotels for the room rental, city officials said last year. The association takes a “nominal fee” for administrative expenses, its CEO said.

“This agreement is an extension of the non-profit HANYC foundation’s ongoing work since COVID to connect city funding with hotels to address New York’s need to provide emergency services to the homeless,” said Hotel Association CEO Vijay Dandapani.

“The foundation began providing this service five years ago pro-bono and only takes a nominal fee for limited administrative expenses in order to ensure taxpayer money is spent efficiently.”

Dandapani said the $929.1 million is the maximum authorized but not guaranteed to be spent under the contract, and noted the city’s spending on these services “has declined steadily over the last two years.” The contract comes as the trade group is lobbying city lawmakers to slash the hotel occupancy tax on tourists from 6% to 3%.

The city began relying more extensively on hotels for emergency lodging and shelter during the COVID-19 pandemic, to help contain the spread of the deadly bug, a trend that dramatically expanded during the peak of the migrant crisis, when 4,000 asylum seekers flooded the Big Apple each week.

The Adams administration defended extending the emergency contract with hotels, saying the Big Apple is still grappling with a high shelter population compared to the pre-pandemic year 2019, when there were 61,415 people in shelters.

The number hit as high as 140,134 in January 2024, a staggering 127% from two years prior, according to a report issued by state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli.

Under New York’s right to shelter policy, the city must provide emergency shelter to all who need it, sources said.

There are currently 95,000 people living in taxpayer-funded shelters in New York City.Rob Jejenich / NY Post Design

The city said it has now spent $3.12 billion on shelter and related costs to house migrants since the crisis began in 2022, including costs to rent hotel rooms.

“As the city’s shelter system was pushed to its limits following an influx of new arrivals, the Adams administration acted quickly and decisively to effectively address the crisis and acquire emergency shelter capacity to serve households in need,” a Department of Social Services/Homeless Services spokesman said.

“While the administration’s whole-of-government response to the crisis has significantly reduced the number of households living in shelter, the total shelter census still far exceeds pre-pandemic highs.”

Some 150 hotels in the five boroughs sheltered migrants in tens of thousands of rooms at the peak of the migrant crisis set off in the midst of an influx at the southern border during the administration of former President Joe Biden.

The historic Roosevelt Hotel in Midtown Manhattan became a very visible symbol of the city’s struggles to contend with the influx of migrants into the city. Roosevelt was used as an intake center near tourist hot spots and in an area packed with commuters while “tent cities” plagued by issues including crime popped up elsewhere in the five boroughs.

But Mayor Eric Adams announced the phase-out and closure of the city’s largest emergency shelters in recent months — including the massive tent encampments at Randall’s Island and Floyd Bennett Field. The closure announcements came as the number of new arrivals plummeted and some asylum seekers were moved outside of the Big Apple.

A line of people waiting outside of the Roosevelt Hotel migrant shelter on Feb. 25, 2025.Michael Nagle
People removing bags from the Roosevelt Hotel ahead of the closure on June 18, 2025.Christopher Sadowski

President Trump returned to office in January, launching a border crackdown and taking a hardline stance on illegal immigration, which has further fueled the slowing influx into the city. Illegal border crossings have slowed to a trickle under beefed up enforcement — from a peak of 4,000 per week to just a few hundred.

Locally, dozens of hotels that were used as migrant shelters were slowly phased out and transitioned back to lodging tourists, including those in Times Square and around John F. Kennedy Airport and LaGuardia Airport.

The controversial move to pay hotels to house migrants has sparked some friction between Mayor Adams and the president — after the Trump administration in February yanked $80.5 million in federal funding sent to the city after Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency deemed the money was being wasted on “luxury hotels” to house illegal immigrants.

City Comptroller Brad Lander discovered the funding — approved by Congress and former President Joe Biden — had been pulled back from its accounts. Adams sued Trump in federal court to recoup the $80.5 million, denying the space was “luxury.”

Part of the federal funding offered the city $12.50 a night reimbursement for each hotel room. City officials denied that migrants were getting luxury accommodations.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/19/us-news/nyc-inks-1-billion-shelter-contract-with-hotels-despite-end-of-migrant-crisis/

Netanyahu suggests Israel can strike Iran nuke site, believed under a mountain, without US help

 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly implied that his country is capable of attacking all of Iran’s nuclear facilities — even the secretive Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, which is believed to be buried half a mile under a mountain.

Netanyahu insisted the Jewish state “will achieve all our objectives” despite many military experts doubting that the Jewish state has the capabilities of taking out the underground nuclear facility site.

“We will achieve all our objectives and hit all of their nuclear facilities. We have the capability to do that,” Netanyahu said when asked by a reporter about Fordow specifically.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that his country can hit all of Iran’s nuclear facilities.via REUTERS

Israel has struck several Iranian nuclear sites since launching its “Operation Rising Lion” airstrikes on the Islamic Republic, including a primary facility in Natanz, as well as ones near Tehran and Isfahan.

The Israelis have also taken out over a dozen top Iranian scientists and key military brass as well.

Fordow, meanwhile, has loomed large over President Trump’s decision on whether or not the US should enter the Israel-Iran conflict.

Israel has bunker buster bombs, but is believed to lack the heavy-duty type that could destroy Fordow.Merrill Sherman / NY Post Design

Many military analysts have said that the US is Israel’s only ally with advanced bombers within range that could carry heavy bunker-buster bombs to take the secretive site out.

However, there is some debate among analysts about whether the US can even successfully destroy Fordow with those high-powered bombs.

The president said Thursday he would make his final decision on whether to strike Iran in the “next two weeks,” because he’s still hoping for negotiations.

“Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,” Trump said in a statement read aloud by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt Thursday.

The commander in chief has faced a MAGA revolt among his base over the conflict, with prominent allies such as Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson demanding the US stay out of the rapidly escalating situation.

Fordow is widely seen as one of the most complicated Iranian nuclear facilities to penetrate.Merrill Sherman / NY Post Design

Netanyahu said that the decision of whether the US should enter the conflict is “entirely” up to Trump.

“He’ll do what’s good for the United States, and I’ll do what’s good for the State of Israel,” the prime minister said, adding, “as the saying goes — every contribution is welcome.”

Over the weekend, Netanyahu defended Israel’s decision to attack Iran and brushed aside questions about Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s testimony earlier this year that the intelligence community has assessed that “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.”

“The intel we got and we shared with the United States was absolutely clear — was absolutely clear — that they were working in a secret plan to weaponize the uranium,” Netanyahu said on a special edition of Fox News’ “Special Report with Bret Baier” Sunday.

The Israel-Iran conflict has been rapidly escalating since Israel launched its preemptive strikes last week.IRANIAN SUPREME LEADER'S WEBSITE/AFP/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

“They were marching very quickly. They would achieve a test device and possibly an initial device within months and certainly less than a year,” he added. “I think we have excellent intel in Iran.”

Trump has since told reporters he believes Iran is close to a nuke in a rebuke of Gabbard. Gabbard later downplayed murmurs of daylight between her and Trump on that assessment.

For years, Netanyahu has warned that Iran was close to finishing a nuclear weapon.

Iran had been enriching uranium up to 60% purity before Israel’s attack. Typically, 90% enrichment is seen as the weapons-level threshold, but scientists at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have noted that it’s easier to get from 60% to 90% enrichment than it is to get to 60%.

Iran has denied that it is pursuing a nuke, insisting it was only enriching uranium for peaceful means. However, 60% enrichment is not needed to achieve nuclear power for peaceful means.

Last week, the IAEA disclosed a 22-page unclassified report about Iran’s nuclear program that did not provide evidence that the regime was after a nuke, but raised concerns about its enrichment levels.

“The Agency has no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme

of the type described above in Iran and notes the statements of the highest officials in Iran that the use
of nuclear weapons is incompatible with Islamic Law,” the report said.

Skeptics have argued that Israel’s attack came in the middle of US negotiations with Iran over the theocratic regime’s nuclear program and have speculated that Israel is taking advantage of Tehran’s weaknesses after its proxies have been battered since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/19/us-news/israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu-implies-israel-can-take-out-fordow-without-us-help/

Chi Mayor Johnson seen nixing curfew ordinance, downtown residents concerned on 'teen takeovers'

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is expected to formally veto an expanded curfew ordinance that passed at Wednesday's City Council meeting in the coming days, and it's raising concerns among some downtown residents that it could lead to more "teen takeovers" this summer.

Critics of the curfew say a veto could save the city from a host of lawsuits.

Residents and visitors to Streeterville have endured a pair of "teen takeovers" in the past few months, in which both times Chicago police said someone was shot. Now there is concern about what the curfew veto could mean for the community's safety this summer.

Downtown Chicago is a magnet for visitors during the summer, whether it's the ever popular Millennium Park or Streeterville, with its restaurants, shopping and nightlife. The curfew ordinance held out hope of more safety in the neighborhood. The promised mayoral veto delivered disappointment.

"Well, our concerns is that we will relive history here, and that the teens will now think that they can come back and take over the street and terrorize the residents and visitors and workers of Streeterville," said Deborah Gershbein, President Streeterville Organization of Active Residents.

The recent "teen takeovers" are the scenes that Deborah Gershbein remembers all too vividly. She was caught in the middle of one "teen takeover" in late March.

"When you have hundreds of people in one place out of control, there's bound to be problems," Gershbein said.

Mayor Johnson promised to veto the curfew bill, calling it bad public policy during a Wednesday press conference.

"To move on a policy that we already know historically leads to criminalization and incarceration. Why on God's green earth would I actually repeat the sins of those who came before us?" Johnson said.

The ACLU said the ordinance, which passed out of council 27-22, is also fraught with constitutional issues.

"It certainly would have resulted in lawsuits," Ed Yohnka said. "Almost every time we see one of these curfews put in place, we end up with lawsuits. This one was particularly egregious because it was so vague in terms of when and where it was enforced if."

Yohnka contends it's also problematic because it gives additional powers to police that they don't need to disperse crowds or arrest people for criminal conduct.

Gershbein thinks the mayor is out of touch with the reality she and her neighbors have had to deal with.

"I don't think he really listened to our concerns," Gershbein said. "He doesn't understand he needs to come and be in the midst of one of these 'teen takeovers,' and then maybe he'll understand how dangerous it is for everyone."

The mayor may veto the curfew ordinance as soon as Friday, but supporters will get a chance at next month's City Council meeting to try and override it. They will need to flip seven votes in order to make that happen.

Chicago Police Superintendent Larry Snelling issued the following statement Wednesday:

"The Chicago Police Department and myself are focused on public safety. I have been clear that we will do everything in our power to prevent violence, utilizing the resources available to us. To be clear, we have always enforced the law at large gatherings and will continue to do so at all future large gatherings. Those who commit crimes or acts of violence will be arrested and held accountable.

"The curfew ordinance has become more a matter of politics than public safety. Given that this is a matter that sits within the City Council, I have no further comment. My focus remains solely on the safety of our communities and what CPD is doing to enhance that safety."

https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-mayor-brandon-johnson-expected-veto-controversial-curfew-plan-passed-city-council-teen-takeover-concerns-rise/16791839/