Search This Blog

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

'Caught In Sarepta ‘Downdraft,’ Arrowhead Becomes RNAi Knight in Shining Armor'

 

Sarepta’s troubles had nothing to do with Arrowhead’s assets, and yet both companies have seen their stock prices decline this past month. BioSpace caught up with Arrowhead’s Chris Anzalone to talk about the biotech’s role as an RNAi pipeline savior.

Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals’ shares have fallen 12% in the past month, but it had little to do with work going on at the RNA interference specialist. Instead, it was Arrowhead’s association with Sarepta Therapeutics—with which it has a partnership worth as much as $11 billion—that sowed the chaos at the markets.

“We have been caught in that downdraft as well, unfortunately,” Arrowhead CEO Chris Anzalone told BioSpace, speaking to Sarepta’s gene therapy safety drama that has been playing out over the past month. “And it’s not unreasonable. I think that people were curious about Sarepta’s ability to perform on the partnership.”

For the record, Anzalone isn’t worried about Sarepta dropping out of the alliance. He thinks the deal is too sweet for both sides. H.C. Wainwright Research agreed in a July 31 note, calling the partnership “symbiotic and mutually beneficial.”

Annalee Armstrong for BioSpace

“[Sarepta] have said quite clearly that—and I don’t want to put words in their mouth, but my interpretation is—the future of their company is based on the assets they got from us,” Anzalone said.

Indeed, Sarepta last month announced a strategic restructuring and pipeline pivot away from its legacy gene therapies and toward a handful of siRNA platform assets that are partnered with Arrowhead.

Even so, Anzalone understands why investors have been nervous. “Cash from Sarepta is a big part of our financial model over the next two years,” he said. HCW pointed out that the non-dilutive capital provided by Sarepta is key to Arrowhead’s plans to reach cash flow–positive operations by 2030.

With some explaining of what happens if Sarepta doesn’t pay, Anzalone said that investors have been reaching the place he is at right now.

“I’m almost at equivoce. The deal goes as planned. Great. The deal goes under, we get our assets back and we keep the cash. That’s also fine.”

The Future of Sarepta Is Here

Sarepta’s pipeline pivot should have been good news for Arrowhead—it was a vote of confidence for the biotech’s platform and a sign that Sarepta saw the massive partnership as its future. But a day later, the company’s months-long safety drama came to a head.

On July 18, Sarepta revealed that a third patient had died after taking one of its gene therapies. This spurred a market tumble for both companies. While Arrowhead kept its head down, Sarepta became wrapped up in a very public dispute with the FDA. Analysts began to wonder if Sarepta could keep up its commitments to Arrowhead.

The deal, signed in November 2024, is worth $825 million upfront, with as much as $10 billion possible later on through a series of consistent payments tied to enrollment and other clinical development milestones. The partnership is focused on rare genetic diseases of the muscle, central nervous system and lung, with two key Phase I muscular disease programs: ARO DM1 for type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) and ARO-DUX4 for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1). The deal also includes two other clinical-stage therapies and three preclinical programs.

Arrowhead has been working swiftly behind the scenes on the Sarepta programs, already meeting one of the Phase I enrollment targets for ARO DM1 that would trigger a $100 million milestone. This payment is due by the end of the fourth quarter under the terms of the agreement. Anzalone doesn’t anticipate any issues with that payout.

“I expect [Sarepta] to continue to perform, and we’ve seen no evidence that they will not,” Anzalone said. “I would read into that that they’re going to spend their last dollar to make sure that [the deal] stays intact, because it’s so important for them strategically.”

But if they don’t, Anzalone said the contract has solid termination framework, which HCW also noted. If Sarepta stops paying, the assets fall back to Arrowhead and no cash has to be returned.

“Look, I’m okay with either of those things—again, I don’t think the latter is going to happen. I think they’re going to perform,” Anzalone said. “The fail-safe here is that we get a bunch of really good assets back and move forward ourselves.” The CEO also expressed an openness to work with Sarepta in the future to tweak the deal if needed.

While the situation is a little uncertain, Anzalone said he’s confident in one thing: “These are good assets.”

Looking back at the deal process, Anzalone said he would still sign the same one today. Sarepta—which is known for its Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapies—was a natural fit for ARO-DUX4, an RNA interference (RNAi) conjugate in development for the progressive genetic muscle disease FSHD1.

Anzalone remembers the scope of the partnership growing as discussions went on with Sarepta CEO Doug Ingram. Sarepta at that time was in the initial stages of commercializing Elevidys after its June 2023 approval—before it ran into the safety problems it faces today—but had a fairly empty pipeline.

“They appear to be good at regulatory, commercial and late-stage development, but they didn’t have much of a pipeline. And we are nothing but pipeline,” Anzalone said. “So it just kind of grew. And next thing you knew, we were doing what was going to be a very large deal.”

The final terms eventually work out to somewhere around $11 billion. Besides the $100 million ARO DM1 enrollment milestone, Anzalone expects to trigger another $200 million by the end of the year for the same program, plus a $50 million milestone in February 2026 for an R&D milestone.

“We didn’t pick anybody’s pocket. This was, I think, as good a deal for Sarepta as it was for us,” Anzalone said. “This is one of those funny deals that I would be glad to take either side of the transaction.”

Data from the first Sarepta-partnered programs ARO DM1 and ARO DUX4 are expected by the end of the year, and while there’s no firm date, Anzalone suspects Sarepta’s leadership will be eager to make the results public once they’re ready. He said those data are expected to be interpretable—which is to say, investors should get their first true assessment of the programs’ likelihood of success.

“Too early data that doesn’t tell a story . . . can be confusing, but as soon as there is a nugget of a story, I’d like to put that out,” Anzalone said.

Pizza and Beer Money

The modality itself, RNAi, is derisked thanks to larger peer Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, and Arrowhead is largely seen as the next in line biopharma to capitalize on the technology.

Besides Sarepta, Arrowhead is also partnered with Amgen, GSK and Takeda and is awaiting its first FDA approval this fall for the lead candidate in its wholly owned pipeline. Plozasiran is set for a Nov. 18 decision date for possible approval in familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS), a rare genetic metabolic disorder that prevents the body from breaking down fats.

“[Arrowhead’s] RNAi pipeline is steadily advancing toward commercial-stage maturity, independent of partnership support,” HCW said.

With such a focus on partnering, Anzalone said it was important to the team to take plozasiran all the way alone, even though Arrowhead could have continued as just an R&D company.

With that kind of model, “you can stay capitalized and stay in what I call pizza and beer, but you can’t really make that leap to be an independent, longer-term valuable biotech company that say Vertex, Regeneron and the like have translated into,” the CEO said.

To ensure success, Anzalone said the team has bulked up with regulatory experts and is focusing on the small FCS market first.

“We, like any company who goes from an R&D-only organization to R&D plus commercial, are going to make a lot of dumb mistakes,” Anzalone admitted. “But it’s an ultra-rare indication and [has] allowed us to kind of get our feet wet and learn how to be a commercial organization.”

Afterward, Arrowhead is targeting the much larger severe hypertriglyceridemia indication with plozasiran. The therapy is currently being tested in a trio of Phase III clinical trials with completion expected in mid-2026. These readouts could pave the way for Arrowhead’s second FDA nod.

Besides the lead plozasiran program, Arrowhead has caught the obesity craze and is working on two early assets. Of the two, Anzalone is most excited about ARO-ALK7, which is meant to silence the ACVR1C gene, in turn reducing the risk of obesity-related metabolic complications. These two programs are not up for partnering, Anzalone says. Arrowhead is specifically focused on providing better weight loss and improving tolerability.

“This is the health need of our time in western economies and so the GLP-1s are a very good start, but there’s a ton of white space there.”

https://www.biospace.com/business/caught-in-sarepta-downdraft-arrowhead-becomes-rnai-knight-in-shining-armor

"Expect Violence" - Larry Klayman Says Trump Must Take Out Deep State Now

 Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

Renowned attorney Larry Klayman says the coming indictments of the Deep State traitors who tried to frame President Trump as a Russian spy in his first term are all in serious trouble.  Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard charges that Obama Administration officials politicized intelligence and laid the groundwork for a “years-long coup” against President Donald Trump after he won the 2016 election.  Gabbard first uncovered a mountain of documents implicating many in the so-called Deep State.

Gabbard claimed in a post on X that former President Barack Obama and key members of his national security team, including then-CIA Director John Brennan and then-DNI James Clapper, fabricated a narrative about Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election to “subvert” Trump’s presidency.

They even made up evidence, such as the so-called Steele Dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton.  They were all lies to make President Trump look bad. 

If these people are not stopped now while Trump is in office, and in control of the DOJ, then they will come after him when he is out of office and no longer in power.  

Klayman says, “Why is this different from the past?"

"President Trump and the people around him, including Tulsi Gabbard, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, Dan Bongino and others, have learned what they are up against.  They’ve tried now to assassinate the President twice.  I believe the Left and the Democrats were behind it.  I think they wanted him dead. 

They did not want him (Trump) to be elected.  There was also all the lawfare (like warfare) over the last many years.  

It’s obvious Trump and his team have come to the conclusion that they have to get the Left and the Deep State before they get them.”

Klayman says President Trump is at greater risk now than anytime in the past.  Klayman explains:

Because President Trump has been so successful thus far, he is at great risk.  There will likely be other assassination attempts and on the lives of other people in the cabinet. 

There will be attempts of assassination of anybody who supports him. 

I was in California recently, and I was wearing my Trump inauguration jacket from 2017, and some guy starts screaming I was a Nazi and this and that. 

I did not respond because I was in the middle of a bank. 

There is so much hatred out there, and this is why they have to take these people out legally and peacefully.

Klayman points out people have the right to defend themselves, especially in the home, and Klayman urges people to use their Second Amendment rights if and when there is a need to do so.   As the indictments come down in the not-so-distant future, expect violence.  Klayman says,

“The Left has its back up against the wall.  They are a drowning man, so to speak. . .. There will be violence.  They will try to foment violence.

Who is likely to be indicted?  Klayman names a few for starters.  This list includes John Brennan, James Clapper, Peter Strzok and Mark Elias.  Then Klayman predicts,

“They will first go for the low hanging fruit before they get to Hillary Clinton and other higher ups.  They will see if they can flip them.  This time it’s different, and this time I believe there will be some accountability.

There is much more in the 58-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with renowned lawyer and government corruption fighter Larry Klayman, founder of FreedomWatchUSA.org, as he updates us on the Trump Administration fighting back against the Deep State takeover of America for 8.9.25.

*  *  *

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/expect-violence-larry-klayman-says-trump-must-take-out-deep-state-now

Netanyahu: 'If We Wanted To Commit Genocide, It Would Have Taken Exactly One Afternoon'

 Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the accusation that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, but at a recent press conference he employed a reference which stunned press pool reporters.

"If we had wanted to commit genocide, it would have taken exactly one afternoon," he had said, as quoted in Times of Israel. This comes as Israeli forces are increasingly accused of intentionally using starvation tactics to gain total submission of the enclave, which Tel Aviv has rejected as false.

Image via LA Times

Netanyahu has been on the defensive, doing back-to-back press conferences focused on foreign journalists, and seeking to also deflect accusations that Israel has not used humanitarian aid as a tool of war.

There's been immense domestic and international criticism as he's chosen to puruse to total military defeat of Hamas, a goal which ultimatley could take years more to fully accomplish.

Netanyahu further once again denied that the population of Gaza is undergoing starvation, also alleging that most of the civilians killed are used intentionally by Hamas as human shields.

Below is more of what he had to say in context related to his firm comments on the question of genocide:

"There is no starvation. There hasn’t been starvation. There was a shortage. And certainly, there was no policy of starvation," Netanyahu said at the press conference. "If we had wanted starvation, if that had been our policy, 2 million Gazans wouldn’t be living today after 20 months."

He continued, "It’s the same with genocide —  if we had wanted to commit genocide, it would have taken exactly one afternoon."

Netanyahu has also increasingly begun addressing the clear shift in the American Right, or at least some influential corners of it - such as Tucker Carlson or Marjorie Taylor Greene's commentary which has grown fiercly criticial of Israeli policies:

Netanyahu is sounding the alarm on a new kind of war: a "concerted effort" to turn young Christians against Israel. He's blaming "purchased influencers" and a media that's rewriting history one post at a time.

 

Al Jazeera is meanwhile reporting that Israeli jets have renewed their bombing of Gaza City, after the government declared a new and expanded offensive there, and that since dawn on Tuesday at least 67 Palestinians have died.

Denmark has become the latest European country to join humanitarian air drop operations over the Strip, amid the controversy over aid getting in.

Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen has admitted that air drops are "by no means an optimal way to deliver emergency aid" - given the potential for harm to people on the ground. "It is a kind of emergency solution, but it is also where we are now," he said.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/netanyahu-if-we-wanted-commit-genocide-it-would-have-taken-exactly-one-afternoon

"Tariffs Have Not Caused Inflation" - Trump Rages At "Bad Predictions", Slams Goldman CEO

 Update (1020ET): President Trump rage-posted about the lack of inflation amid all the tariff-fearmongering...

"Trillions of Dollars are being taken in on Tariffs, which has been incredible for our Country, its Stock Market, its General Wealth, and just about everything else.

It has been proven, that even at this late stage, Tariffs have not caused Inflation, or any other problems for Country, other than massive amounts of CASH pouring into our Treasury’s coffers.

Also, it has been shown that, for the most part, Consumers aren’t even paying these Tariffs, it is mostly Companies and Governments, many of them Foreign, picking up the tabs. "

Then took direct aim at Goldman Sachs:

"But David Solomon and Goldman Sachs refuse to give credit where credit is due.

They made a bad prediction a long time ago on both the Market repercussion and the Tariffs themselves, and they were wrong, just like they are wrong about so much else.

I think that David should go out and get himself a new Economist or, maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ, and not bother running a major Financial Institution."

Ouch!

Meanwhile, just between us girls, Goldman has been somewhat more in the 'one-time, marginal' incremental impact of tariffs (as opposed to the UMich terror tantrum), with one of their latest notes highlighting the ""Sharp Declines" In Import Prices As Foreigners Absorb Trump's Tariffs."

...even though Jan Hatzius did claim that US firms are eating up to two-thirds of the increased tariff costs most recently (even though that was not evident in the earnings data this season).

American consumers have absorbed roughly 22 percent of the costs from President Donald Trump’s tariffs through June, but that is expected to swell to 67 percent by year‑end if the pattern of past levies holds, Goldman Sachs economists said in a note this week.

Businesses have so far carried around 64 percent of the costs, and foreign exporters about 14 percent, according to the analysis led by Jan Hatzius.

By December, Goldman expects businesses’ share to fall below 10 percent and foreign exporters’ share to rise to 25 percent. The bank projects the shift will lift core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) inflation—a key Federal Reserve gauge—to 3.2 percent in December versus 2.4 percent without tariff effects. In June, core PCE inflation came in at 2.8 percent.

*  *  *

With a new boss looming at The BLS, one wonders what the 'old boss' has in hand for today's CPI data (with consensus seeing both headline and core YoY price changes ticking higher) after June's consumer prices came in cooler than expected, disappointing the Trump Tariff Tantrum crowd. Will this time be different... Will the dreaded tariff-flation show up this time?

Headline CPI rose 0.2% MoM in July (as expected) and +2.7% YoY (cooler than the 2.8% expected) and in line with the June print...

Source: Bloomberg

Headline CPI rose 0.2%, after rising 0.3% in June. CPI Core rose 0.3% in July, following a 0.2% increase in June.

  • Indexes that increased over the month include medical care, airline fares, recreation, household furnishings and operations, and used cars and trucks.

  • The indexes for lodging away from home and communication were among the few major indexes that decreased in July.

Core CPI rose 0.3% MoM (as expected) but YoY rose 3.1% (hotter than the 3.0% expected) - the highest since February...

Source: Bloomberg

Under the hood, Fuel Oil and Transportation costs rose the most but Gasoline and Food at Home costs fell MoM...

Core CPI MoM Details:

  • The shelter index increased 0.2 percent over the month.

    • The index for owners’ equivalent rent rose 0.3 percent in July as did the index for rent.

    • Conversely, the lodging away from home index fell 1.0 percent in July.

  • The medical care index increased 0.7 percent over the month, following a 0.5-percent increase in June.

    • The index for dental services increased 2.6 percent in July and the index for hospital and related services increased 0.4 percent.

    • The physicians’ services index rose 0.2 percent over the month, while the prescription drugs index fell 0.2 percent.

  • The index for airline fares increased 4.0 percent over the month, after declining 0.1 percent in June.

  • The recreation index increased 0.4 percent over the month, as did the household furnishings and operations index.

  • The index for used cars and trucks rose 0.5 percent in July and the index for personal care rose 0.4 percent.

  • The new vehicles index was unchanged over the month while the communication index fell 0.3 percent.

Annual changes:

  • The shelter index increased 3.7 percent over the last year. Other indexes with notable increases over the last year include medical care (+3.5 percent), household furnishings and operations (+3.4 percent), motor vehicle insurance (+5.3 percent), and recreation (+2.4 percent).

Goods inflation is accelerating (some will argue 'tariffs', some will argue fuel) while Services inflation has stabilized...

Source: Bloomberg

There is one problem in the data... SuperCore CPI (Services ex-Shelter) rose 0.55% MoM (hottest since January) and up 3.59% YoY (hottest since February)...

Source: Bloomberg

The jump in Transportation costs and Medical Care Services stood out for SuperCore (neither seem like they are affected in any way by tariffs)...

3m and 6m annualized CPI is also refusing to bow to the terror predicted by Trump tariff haters...

So, not exactly the screaming spike in prices that Democrats interviewed by UMich have hallucinated about?

It is worth noting that 32% of the inputs for CPI are now 'imputed' using the un-preferred "different cell" method...

Different cell imputation expands the search to include prices for similar items or prices in a broader geographic area. While different cell imputation does not introduce bias, it can lead to greater volatility in the CPI data. 

Tiffany Wilding, Pimco economist, tells Bloomberg TV that tariff-related pressures are contained within certain areas of the report:

“It’s very concentrated within goods, it’s happening slowly, and outside of that, inflationary pressures look very manageable. So I think for a Federal Reserve, that is a very good sign.” 

Art Hogan, B. Riley Wealth chief market strategist, weighs in:

“Core goods are the real driver of the move up in the index, while being somewhat offset by energy and shelter cost. The report will likely not change the path forward for the Fed, as we expect to see rate cuts at the next three meetings.” 

Rate-cut expectations rose after the CPI print with September now trading at 95%...

But there is a silver lining...

So, Airfares, Dental Care, Auto Insurance, Medical Care, and Rent were among the biggest drivers of upside in CPI... NONE of which have ANYTHING to do with tariffs (even if you squint)

And tariff-related items such as New Cars, Apparel, and Toys barely budged.

And cue the "just wait until next month" arguments!!...

OpenAI Brings GPT-4o Back After Users Revolt Over GPT-5

 OpenAI has brought back GPT-4o following the rollout of their latest GPT-5 model, after users complained that the new model was lame in comparison. 

The company advertised the new model as the "smartest, fastest, most useful model yet," which uses a "real-time router" to switch between more efficient models for basic questions vs. deeper reasoning for more complex demands. 

During a Reddit AMA, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman responded to a question by saying that GPT-5's writing quality is better than previous models - only to have several Redditors say the new model felt "sterile" and "much worse" - and answered "briefly and dryly," according to engadget

"We for sure underestimated how much some of the things that people like in GPT-4o matter to them, even if GPT-5 performs better in most ways," Altman posted on X.

The return of GPT-4o was celebrated, but there's still no guarantee that OpenAI will keep its older model around indefinitely. In the same X post, Altman said that OpenAI "will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for." In the meantime, OpenAI is focusing on finishing the GPT-5 rollout and making changes that will "make it warmer." However, for users who have grown attached to GPT-4o as more than just an AI chatbot, this could be the beginning of the end.

OpenAI called GPT-5 a 'significant upgrade' which used PhD-level intelligence and amazing coding skills, only for users to immediately complain.

"I’ve been trying GPT5 for a few days now. Even after customizing instructions, it still doesn’t feel the same. It’s more technical, more generalized, and honestly feels emotionally distant," wrote one Redditor. "Kill 4o isn’t innovation, it’s erasure."

"Sure, 5 is fine—if you hate nuance and feeling things," wrote another user. 

On Friday, Altman took to X to say that the company would keep the previous model running for Plus users, and promised to implement fixes to improve GPT-5's performance and user experience.

Altman also promised to double GPT-5 rate limits for ChatGPT Plus users, saying "We will continue to work to get things stable and will keep listening to feedback." 

As Wired notes further; The backlash has sparked a fresh debate over the psychological attachments some users form with chatbots trained to push their emotional buttons. Some Reddit users dismissed complaints about GPT-5 as evidence of an unhealthy dependence on an AI companion.

In March, OpenAI published research exploring the emotional bonds users form with its models. Shortly after, the company issued an update to GPT-4o, after it became too sycophantic.

It seems that GPT-5 is less sycophantic, more "business" and less chatty,” says Pattie Maes, a professor at MIT who worked on the study. “I personally think of that as a good thing because it is also what led to delusions, bias reinforcement, etc. But unfortunately many users like a model that tells them they are smart and amazing, and that confirms their opinions and beliefs, even if [they are] wrong.”

h/t Capital.news

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/openai-brings-gpt-4o-back-after-users-revolt-over-gpt-5

Why Medical Device Maker Myomo’s Stock Crashed 42% In After-Hours Trading

 The wearable medical robotics maker slashed its 2025 revenue forecast and posted a wider-than-expected quarterly loss due to weaker lead quality, slower conversions, and rising costs.

The company now sees full-year revenue of $40 million to $42 million, compared with prior guidance of $50 million to $53 million, and attributed the downward revision to lower-than-expected operating trends. It also sees third-quarter revenue of $9.5 million to $10 million.

Revenue for the three months ended June 30 rose 28% from a year earlier to $9.7 million, above the estimate of $9.15 million. However, the company’s losses widened. 

More than half of Q2 revenue came from Medicare Part B patients, helped by higher unit volumes and average selling prices. 

However, key forward indicators weakened: orders and insurance authorizations slipped 3% to 207 units, backlog fell 18% to 230 units, and gross margin narrowed to 62.7% from 70.8% due to higher material and overhead costs.

https://stocktwits.com/news-articles/markets/equity/why-medical-device-maker-myomo-s-stock-crashed-42-in-after-hours-trading/chrDsgSRd7b