Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

How Hamas turned kids into terrorists with TV show featuring jihadi mouse, bloodthirsty bunny

 American kids may have grown up with Mr. Rogers telling them, “You are special just the way you are,” but for a child in Gaza there was Farfour—a plushy, genocidal TV mouse screaming “Kill! Kill! Kill!”

Farfour, a costumed Mickey Mouse knockoff, was co-host of a kid’s program called “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” which aired on Hamas-affiliated television station Al-Aqsa TV from April 2007 to October 2009.  

For anyone wondering how the ideologically-crazed fanatical fighters of Hamas came to be, the show offers some answers.

Farfour, a homicidal Mickey Mouse ripoff who advocated martyrdom and Islamic world domination, was murdered on air by IDF soldiers in a skit.YouTube
Criminologists have identified the tactic of using “the deviant peer” to recruit children into abusive situations.YouTube

Billed as educational programming to teach Islamic values to schoolchildren — much like a “Sesame Street” or “Barney & Friends” for the Middle East — “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” was a colorful, sing-song blood orgy celebrating Jew hatred and martyrdom.

The kids who grew up watching it are now fighting age men — like those who carried out the October 7 massacre of nearly 1,200 Israelis and abducted 251 hostages.

On the show, Farfour promised the kids of Gaza that together they’d oversee Islamic world domination and liberate Jerusalem from the “murderers.” He mimicked grenade-throwing and shooting an AK-47.

Nahoul, a killer bee, preached to the school kids: “We will liberate Al-Aqsa from the filth of the criminal Jews,” referring to the fictional town where the characters lived.YouTube
Co-host Saraa Barhoum chats with Assoud the bunny, who promises kids, “I will finish off the Jews and eat them.”YouTube

Mia Bloom, professor of communication and Middle East studies at Georgia State University, remembers “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” well from her research into terror tactics.

“It’s a constant stream of horrific propaganda that is almost impossible for a child to break out of. And so the kids grow up thinking that every Israeli should be killed because every Israeli is bad and evil,” she told the Post.

The show’s co-host, Gaza child star Saraa Barhoum — around 10 years old when the show first aired and the daughter of a university professor mother and a Hamas spokesman father — said in a 2007 interview she wanted to be either a doctor or a martyr when she grew up.

11-year-old co-host Saraa Barhoum, who said she wished to be a doctor or a martyr when she grew up, stands outside the Al-Aqsa studio headquarters with producer Hazem Sharawi in 2007.Tribune News Service via Getty Images
Mia Bloom, a terrorism tactics researcher, says traumatizing children is a means of abusive control.Courtesy of Mia Bloom

She also launched a singing career, recording pop songs with lyrics like, “raise your sail for the sailors, and let your lighthouse illuminate the sea of blood.”

“There’s a concept in criminology called a deviant peer. If I’m a recruiter—if I’m trying to get kids—I’m not going to use a 75-year-old man. I’m going to use a cool kid who’s maybe a few years older,” Bloom says.

“Unfortunately, it’s a common thing that happens within the child abuse space.”

Disney, notorious for swooping in on copyright infringement, was aware of Farfour’s Mickey Mouse likeness but chose to remain silent. They didn’t have to for long: the network murdered Farfour on air during the first season. In the scene, the terror Mouse is being interrogated by IDF soldiers who beat him to death after he refuses to hand over documents.  

“[Hamas’s] argument would be: ‘These kids are already traumatized — this kid doesn’t have a house, lost a sibling — the trauma is already there and the trauma is all around them.’

“This kind of layered trauma that you’re deliberately exposing young Palestinian children to was not just a form of child abuse, but a long-term manipulation,” Middle East expert Bloom says.YouTube
The messages of “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” were reinforced relentlessly in Gaza society, through textbooks, news programs, and magazines.YouTube
Western children’s shows like “Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood” emphasize teaching tolerance and understanding, while children in 2000s Gaza were taught that Jews are descended from pigs.John Beale

“By traumatizing the children through the ‘Pioneers’ show, Hamas basically controlled the narrative and they could direct the trauma, instead of having this vague generalized trauma across society,” Bloom, author of the book “Small Arms: Children and Terrorism” said.   

On the show, Farfour was replaced by a bloodthirsty bumblebee with a squeaky voice named Nahoul, who preached to the kiddos: “We will liberate Al-Aqsa from the filth of the criminal Jews,” referring to the fictional town where the characters lived, and “revenge upon the enemies of God, the murderers of the prophets.”

In season two, Nahoul gets sick. The Israeli authorities won’t issue him a travel permit to receive medical treatment in Egypt and he dies. Nahoul is replaced by his rabbit brother, Assoud, a mangy Bugs Bunny knockoff, who tells the tykes at home in one episode: “A rabbit is a term for a bad person and coward. And I, Assoud, will finish off the Jews and eat them.”

In another episode Assoud is tempted by Satan to steal money from his father and sentenced to have his hand cut off, “as the Prophet Mohammed commanded.” Assoud later dies in an Israeli strike and is replaced by a bear.

In one episode, Palestinian children joined in for a sing along in-studio welcoming their own death.YouTube
Farfour was the first “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” co-host to be murdered on air. Each of his replacements were killed on screen by Israelis.YouTube
A still from Tomorrow’s Pioneers showing Assoud the bunny and his young co-host.IMDb

In another episode, children were invited into the studio to tell the hosts of their wish to die as martyrs, and then sing a song about it.    

“This kind of layered trauma that you’re deliberately exposing young Palestinian children to was not just a form of child abuse, but a long-term manipulation,” Bloom says.

“It relates to October 7th. To have those resources and instead of making things better, you’ve just made things so much worse.”

Farfour the jihadi mouse told Hamas children “We will liberate Al-Aqsa,” referring to the mosque in Jerusalem.YouTube
On Oct. 7, 2003 roughly 3,000 Hamas terrorists attacked various points in Israel, killing 1,200 civilians. Many would have grown up watching “Tomorrow’s Pioneers.”
Bloom, author of the book “Small Arms” compares Hamas’ afterschool program to ISIS requiring children to attend public beheadings. “It’s a constant stream of horrific propaganda.”

While little information is publicly known about the estimated 3,000 Hamas fighters who conducted the Oct. 7 slaughter, ages 16-35 are considered “fighting age” for men—meaning many of those combatants grew up watching their favorite plushy woodland creatures get executed by Jews on afterschool television.

“It’s not just the ‘Pioneers’ TV show. It was amplified and reinforced by the textbooks that the children would read in school that demonized Jews and basically referred to Jews as apes and pigs and other dirty animals,” Bloom says.

A 2008 analysis of Palestinian schoolbooks found a passage comparing Jews to “invading snakes.” In popular media, a late 1990s Palestinian magazine article explained that Jews are the actual sons of apes and, due to the shame felt by this, the “Jewish ape Darwin” invented the theory of evolution and applied it to all humans.

Bloom, who has studied genocide, extremist movements, and child soldiers across the world, says it reminds her of the Taliban and ISIS—both of whom held public beheadings and required children of the community to attend.

“It’s not exactly the same because killing Farfour was fake. But it’s this idea of exposing children to obscene levels of violence. And it creates a preparedness to justify violence and to choose violence over other options.”

https://nypost.com/2025/08/13/world-news/how-hamas-turned-kids-into-terrorists-with-tv-show-featuring-jihadi-mouse-bloodthirsty-bunny/

Clapper’s dismissive response to intel community concerns on Russia election interference report

 Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was adamant about “stickin’ to” the narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump, despite concerns raised by a top intelligence official, top secret emails show. 

Clapper described the Obama administration’s effort to revamp an intelligence community (IC) assessment on “Russia Election Meddling” as a “team sport,” and one that may require the IC to “compromise” its standards, Director of National intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed Wednesday. 

Former National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers warned that his team had concerns about the rush to get the report out and their lack of access to the “underlying intelligence” being used to produce the “joint product related to Russian attribution and intent for the DNC/DCCC hacks,” according to a declassified Dec. 22, 2016, email from the intelligence official to Clapper, ex-CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey. 

Clapper was among several top Obama administration officials tasked by the president in December 2016 to redo a intelligence assessment that initially determined Russia did not hack the 2016 presidential election.AP

“I know that this activity is on a fast-track and that folks have been working very hard to put together a product that can be provided to the President,” Rogers wrote in the email. “However, I wanted to reach out to you directly to let you know of some concerns I have with what I am hearing from my folks.” 

“Specifically, I asked my team if they’d had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence and sufficient time to review that intelligence. On both points my team raised concerns,” the former NSA director stated.

“I’m concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren’t fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments,” Rogers continued, noting that he wasn’t expressing a substantive disagreement with the report’s conclusion. 

“I do want to make sure that, when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper, that we don’t have any reason to hesitate because of the process,” he added. “I know that you agree that this is something we need to be 100% comfortable with before we present it to the President –  we have one chance to get this right, and it is critical that we do so.” 

“I’m concerned we are not there yet.” 

Rogers said he would “stand down on these concerns” if the report didn’t have to be co-authored by the NSA, but for his agency to sign-off, he would need to see “even the most sensitive evidence related to the conclusion.” 

Rogers expressed concern with how quickly the report was being produced and his team’s lack of access to the sensitive information it was being based on.AP

Clapper urged the NSA to fall in line in his short response to Rogers. 

“Understand your concern. It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page. and are all supportive of the report — in the highest tradition of ‘that’s OUR story, and we’re stickin’ to it,’” Clapper wrote back.  

The ex-DNI went on to shut down any talk of “more time” being needed. 

“We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report … but, more time is not negotiable,” Clapper insisted.   

“We may have to compromise on our ‘normal’ modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule,” he added. 

“This is one project that has to be a team sport,” Clapper demanded. 

Gabbard declassified the top secret emails between Rogers and Clapper on Wednesday.MediaPunch / BACKGRID

The exchange came days after a Dec. 9, 2016, meeting between former President Barack Obama, Clapper, Brennan and other top administration officials, during which the president demanded a report detailing the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.”

The previous intelligence community assessment, rejected by Obama, determined that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.” 

The NSA would go on to sign-off of the new report, along with the CIA and FBI.

Gabbard, who has been on warpath against the actors behind the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, said Clapper’s email “reinforces what we already exposed.” 

“[T]he decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,” Gabbard said in a statement. 

“Clapper’s own words confirm that complying with the order to manufacture intelligence was a ‘team sport,’” she added.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/13/us-news/emails-show-james-clappers-dismissive-response-to-intel-community-concerns-over-russia-election-interference-report/

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones says has ‘no tumors’ after stage 4 cancer PD-1 treatment

 Dallas Cowboys owner and general manager Jerry Jones says he has “no tumors” after dealing with stage 4 cancer and using an experimental trial drug.

Jones, 82, said in an interview with the Dallas Morning News on Tuesday that he was diagnosed with stage 4 melanoma in 2010 and started treatment shortly after.

Roughly 105,000 new melanomas are expected to be diagnosed in the U.S. this year, according to the American Cancer Society, while about 8,400 are expected to die of the skin cancer.

While the exact cause of every melanoma is unknown, the Mayo Clinic says most are brought on by exposure to ultraviolet light. Areas that are often exposed to the sun, like the skin on your arms and legs, typically serve as starting points for melanoma.

Over the following decade, Jones underwent two lung surgeries and two lymph node surgeries, he told the newspaper.

Treating melanoma will vary based on the severity of the case and whether it has spread. Options typically include surgery and therapies like radiation, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy, the Mayo Clinic explains.

Jerry Jones attends the Premiere of Netflix’s “America’s Team: The Gambler And His Cowboys” at The Egyptian Theatre Hollywood on August 11, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

Early treatment can cure most skin cancers, the Cleveland Clinic notes, but advanced cases can be fatal. A 2021 National Library of Medicine article found that the five-year survival rate for stage 4 melanoma was 29.8 percent.

“I was saved by a fabulous treatment and great doctors and a real miracle [drug] called PD-1 [therapy],” Jones said. “I went into trials for that PD-1 and it has been one of the great medicines.”

The American Cancer Society says that PD-1 therapy is a “checkpoint protein” that helps prevent immune cells called “T cells” from attacking normal cells. Some cancer cells, however, have enough PD-L1, a protein found on some normal and cancer cells.

Inhibitors like PD-1 are meant to help a patient’s “immune system to better find and attack the cancer cells, wherever they are in the body.” They can be used to respond to several types of cancer, according to the American Cancer Society.

“I now have no tumors,” Jones said Tuesday.

ESPN reported that Jones talks about undergoing cancer treatments at MD Anderson in Houston in the upcoming Netflix documentary series “America’s Team: The Gambler and His Cowboys“, but he does not reveal the details of the treatment.

The docuseries discusses Jones’ purchase of the Cowboys, Tom Landry’s firing, Jimmy Johnson’s hiring, and the rise of the 1990s Cowboys teams. Stories about Jones’ life are interspersed throughout the series.

The docuseries premieres on Aug. 19.

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/5450598-dallas-cowboys-jerry-jones-cancer-update/

Semaglutides may shrink muscle size, strength: Study

 New research suggests popular weight loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy may affect more than just fat, raising questions about muscle strength and organ size after significant weight loss.

University of Utah scientists studied semaglutide, the active ingredient in weight loss medications, in mice.

In the study, published in the journal Cell Metabolism, researchers revealed “unexpected effects,” highlighting that lean mass, or body weight that isn’t fat, dropped about 10 percent. Most of the loss came from non-muscle tissues, particularly the liver, which shrank by nearly half. Some skeletal muscles lost around 6 percent of their size, while others remained unchanged.

Despite relatively small changes in muscle size, certain muscles became weaker. Researchers said this could be especially concerning for adults over 60, who already face higher risks of muscle loss and reduced mobility.

“The loss of physical function is a strong predictor of not just quality of life but longevity,” said Katsu Funai, the senior author on the study. 

The findings challenge the assumption that lean mass loss comes mainly from skeletal muscle. Instead, they point to changes in metabolically active organs, such as the liver, which can shrink during healthy weight loss without harming function.

“It’s unlikely that the observed lean mass loss represents a serious adverse effect,” said Takuya Karasawa, co-first author on the study. 

Still, scientists emphasize that further human studies are necessary to determine whether similar effects occur in humans and whether they pose health risks.

“There remains a significant need for validation in humans, especially concerning muscle strength,” Karasawa said.

They also suggest that future clinical trials should track not only lean mass but also muscle strength and physical function, especially as more weight loss drugs enter the market.

“There are many additional weight loss drugs that are in clinical trials and coming out in the next three to five years,” Funai said. “But with all those clinical trials, if they’re interested in measuring lean mass loss, they need to consider physical function.” 

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5448630-semaglutides-muscle-health-study/

Forget gerrymandering — Texas could send 8 more Republicans to the Senate

 The possibility of Texas and other like-minded states redistricting their congressional districts has captured national political attention. Gerrymandering has been a long-term controversy among the various states. Courts have also tried to exert their own political imprint upon the process.

There is, however, a looming possibility involving the Lone Star State that is not often discussed, but could have far larger political consequences.

When Texas was admitted to the Union in 1845, one of the unusual concessions was a condition that allows the state to split into additional states. So even though Democrats have heralded the possibility of adding the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico as states in order to increase the number of Democrats in Congress, few Texans realize that they have an exceptional power that could more radically reshape American politics than any amount of House redistricting.

John “Cactus Jack” Garner — vice president under Franklin D. Roosevelt from 1933 to 1941 and former Speaker of the House — declared in 1932 that “an area twice as large and rapidly becoming as populous as New England should have at least 10 senators, and the only way we can get them is to make five states — not five small states, mind you, but five great states.”

Garner’s exceptional vision is consistent with the big visions of Texans, and political leaders in Texas have regularly appealed to this political right of division.

Past proponents of this idea look to the text of the 1845 congressional resolution annexing Texas: “New States of convenient size not exceeding four in number, in addition to said State of Texas and having sufficient population, may, hereafter by the consent of said State, be formed out of the territory thereof, which shall be entitled to admission under the provisions of the Federal Constitution.”

In 1847, Texas Gov. Isaac Van Zandt ran on the promise of dividing Texas into at least four states. Had he not died of yellow fever prior to taking office, his desire would likely have been realized.

In 1868, west Texans opposed to slavery and in favor of equal rights for former Black slaves wrote and proposed their own constitution, attesting to such as view and nearly adopting it at a constitutional convention in Texas.

Republicans hold the presidency and Congress, plus the Texas governorship and both houses of the state legislature. This opens the door to a political Pandora’s box that could change the U.S. Senate for decades. If Texas were to split into five states, eight senators could be added. A careful drawing of the new maps would allow a strong majority of those senators to end up on the right side of the aisle.

Nate Silver contemplated the ramifications of this possibility in 2009, creating a design that might leave the balance at six senators for Republicans and four for Democrats.

Much has changed in Texas since 2009. Most importantly, the “El Norte” region as imagined by Silver — just north of the Rio Grande — has turned decisively in Republicans’ favor. The region is a telling snapshot of the Democratic Party’s implosion among Hispanics. The map drawn by Silver in today’s Texas could easily render an eight-to-two or even nine-to-one advantage for Republicans.

Of course, Silver would not be the one drawing the boundaries for five new states, Texas Republicans would. And it is not impossible to draw a map ending in a Republican sweep of all 10 Senate seats — and it is easy to envision a net gain of six.

Whether Gov. Greg Abbott’s (R) U.S. House redistricting scheme succeeds or fails, he might want to look at the larger options. Dislodging the current log-jam in the U.S. Senate could remove obstacles surrounding executive appointments and a wider array of budget impasses common to Congress.

So yes — Republicans should consider “messing with Texas.”

Dr. Ben Voth is professor of rhetoric and director of debate at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. He is the author of seven academic books, including “Political Campaign Communication, 10th Edition” (2024) and “Social Fragmentation and the Decline of American Democracy” (2017).

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/5449060-how-texas-could-send-8-more-republicans-to-the-senate/