Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

Google flagging GOP fundraiser emails ‘suspicious’ — sending them directly to spam: memo

 Google is at it again — and GOP campaign donations could be a casualty.

The search giant has been caught this summer flagging Republican fundraising emails as “dangerous” spam — keeping them from hitting gmail users’ inboxes — while leaving similar solicitations from Democrats untouched, a consulting firm warned.

That’s despite repeatedly sparking headlines and lawsuits in recent years over the allegedly partisan practice. Last year, a federal judge tossed a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee that complained of biased email filtering.

Targeted Victory said Gmail was leaving Democratic fundraising emails untouched.SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

In 2023, the Federal Election Commission dismissed an RNC complaint alleging discrimination in Gmail’s spam filters.

Nonetheless, Targeted Victory – whose clients include the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Rep. Steve Scalise and Sen. Marsha Blackburn – said it observed that the “serious and troubling” trend was still going on as recently as June and July of this year.

Gmail has been flagging emails containing links to the fundraising platform WinRed and “in many cases, sending them directly to spam,” according to a copy of the memo to clients exclusively obtained by The Post.

Meanwhile, Targeted Victory conducted tests in which emails containing links to the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue were delivered without issue. The memo included video demonstrations of the firm’s tests.  

“If Gmail is allowed to quietly suppress WinRed links while giving ActBlue a free pass, it will continue to tilt the playing field in ways that voters never see, but campaigns will feel every single day,” the memo said.

Targeted Victory said Google flags GOP fundraising emails as “dangerous.”Targeted Victory

The memo could fuel new allegations of political bias against Google – which was accused by Elon Musk in March of interfering “to help Democrats thousands of times every election season.”

Critics including President Trump have accused Google of manipulating search results to hurt Republicans and even of suppressing information of the assassination attempt against Trump last year. The company has strenuously denied wrongdoing.

When reached for comment on Wednesday, Google spokesperson José Castañeda said the company’s “email filter protections are in place to keep our users safe.”

“They look at a variety of signals – like whether a user has previously marked an email as spam – and apply equally to all senders, regardless of political ideology,” Castañeda said in a statement.

The company said it’s “email filter protections” are meant to keep “our users safe.’SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

A 2022 study by researchers at North Carolina State University found that Gmail flagged 59% more Republican fundraising emails as spam than Democratic ones during the leadup to the 2020 presidential election.

“We observed that the [spam filtering algorithms] of different email services indeed exhibit biases towards different political affiliations,” the researchers said at the time.

Targeted Victory said it first informed Google about the issue on June 30 after receiving complaints from its clients. The company initially “deflected” by “blaming local settings” for the email issues, according to the memo.

The consulting firm’s tests involved sending identical emails through Gmail, with the only difference being that one contained a WinRed donation link and the other contained an ActBlue link.

Republicans have accused Google for years of political bias.REUTERS

“The only difference between the two emails was the link,” the memo said. “ActBlue delivered. WinRed got flagged. That is not a coincidence.”

“This held true even for major accounts, including Trump and Elise Stefanik links, compared to DNC links.

After weeks of back and forth with Google, the company’s support team acknowledged that links to WinRed were deemed “suspicious” and flagged with a “red warning banner” alerting users that it was “potentially suspicious or unsafe,” according to a screenshot of a July 22 email.

“This should alarm every campaign and committee that relies on email to connect with voters,” the memo said.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/13/business/google-caught-flagging-gop-fundraiser-emails-as-suspicious-sending-them-directly-to-spam-memo/

Instagram ‘Map’ ‘significant’ safety and privacy risks that could endanger kids, state AGs warn

 Instagram’s controversial new “Map” feature carries “significant public safety and data privacy concerns” that could endanger kids, a bipartisan group of 37 state attorneys general warned in a letter on Wednesday.

Instagram Map, launched Aug. 6 with little advance notice, enables users to share their exact location with others on the app. The feature has drawn concerns it could place children and others at risk – especially given Mark Zuckerberg’s poor track record on protecting user privacy.

In a Wednesday letter to Instagram chief Adam Mosseri, New Mexico AG Raúl Torrez and others demanded that Meta take several “urgent” steps to promote safety, including disabling the Map feature entirely for underage users and sending a “clear alert” on potential safety risks and how Instagram planned to use the location data.

Instagram’s controversial Map feature is drawing scrutiny from state AGs.

“Unrestricted location-sharing features pose a particular risk for minors as they can be readily
used by sexual predators to identify and geographically target children in the real world,” the letter warned.

“We know that dangerous individuals are already present on Instagram, and we have serious concern that this feature will increase the likelihood of hands-on abuse and exploitation.”

Last week’s surprise rollout of Instagram Map caused panic among users, with one writing on Meta-owned Threads,“I can’t believe Instagram launched a map feature that exposes everyone’s location without any warning.”

Mosseri attempted some damage control, writing in a post that “it looks mostly like people are confused” by the feature. The Instagram boss also noted that users had to consent twice in order to opt in.

“No, no one is confused,” another user shot back. “My friends were screenshotting my location and sending it to me while we were scrambling trying to remove it. You are NOT listening to your users.”

Instagram claimed that users could “choose to responsibly share your location with friends you pick using the Instagram map.” The feature is inactive by default, with users needing to opt in to use it.

Critics have accused Mark Zuckerberg of having a questionable record on user safety.AFP via Getty Images

The company also claimed parents would “have control over their location sharing experience on the map,” including receiving notifications if their child starts sharing their location and the ability to control if they have access to the feature.”

“Real-time location features should of course be intentionally built and give users control, which is why Instagram Map’s design already addresses the issues the attorneys general raise,” Meta spokesman Andy Stone said in a statement.

“It is off by default, everyone receives a notification explaining what the feature entails and can turn it off whenever they want, and with parental supervision, parents get a notification if their teen starts using it and can block their access to it at any time,” Stone added.

Top state prosecutors weren’t convinced, demanding that Meta add a “simple, easy to access feature” allowing Instagram users who had already opted in to disable Map at any time.

On Capitol Hill, Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) have already called on Zuckerberg to get rid of the Map feature.

Attorney General of New Mexico Raúl Torrez is pictured.Getty Images for Accountable Tech

The Wednesday letter’s other signers include Republicans Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has frequently taken legal action against Meta and other Big Tech firms, as well as Georgia’s Chris Carr, Alabama’s Steven Marshall, Arkansas’s Tim Griffin, Illinois’s Kwame Raoul, Nevada’s Aaron Ford and South Dakota’s Marty Jackley and others.

“Meta and Instagram have a responsibility to prioritize user safety over product novelty,” the officials said. “We expect your prompt action and response to prevent Instagram from continuing practices that endanger the safety and privacy of its users.”

Proton, which operates a privacy-focused email service, said Meta’s “past controversies and financial incentives raise questions about the safety of sharing your location data.” It also warned that location-sharing “creates opportunities for cyberstalking.”

Instagram Map is turned off by default, according to Meta.Meta

The scrutiny is another potential headache for Meta, which faces multiple pending lawsuits at the federal and state level over its failure to protect kids online.

New Mexico is currently suing Meta after uncovering evidence that it had exposed kids to adult sex content and disgusting messages from alleged child predators, including “pictures and videos of genitalia.”

As The Post reported, Meta’s security issues also surfaced at the FTC’s antitrust trial seeking a forced selloff of Instagram – with the feds revealing internal documents that showed staffers panicking about so-called “groomers” targeting kids on the app.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/13/business/instagram-map-feature-poses-significant-safety-and-privacy-risks-that-could-endanger-kids-state-ags-warn/

Illinois 3rd state to restrict use of AI in mental health industry, warn about ‘AI psychosis’

 Illinois passed a bill banning therapists from employing artificial intelligence chatbots for assistance with mental health therapy, as experts countrywide warn against people’s ever-growing reliance on the machines.

The “Therapy Resources Oversight” legislation prohibits licensed mental health professionals in Illinois from using AI for treatment decisions or communication with clients. It also bans companies from recommending chatbot therapy tools as a be-all alternative to traditional therapy.

Illinois became the third state to pass a bill banning therapists from relying on artificial intelligence.terovesalainen – stock.adobe.com

Enforcement of the bill will rely on complaints from the public that the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation will investigate. Anyone determined to be violating the ban could face a civil penalty of up to $10,000, according to the legislation text.

Utah and Nevada, two Republican-run states, previously passed similar laws limiting AI’s capacity in mental health services in May and late June, respectively.

Unregulated chatbots can take harmless conversations in any direction, sometimes incidentally leading people into divulging sensitive information or pushing people who are already in vulnerable situations to do something drastic, like take their own life, experts have warned.

Stanford University study released in June found that many chatbots, which are programmed to respond enthusiastically to users, fail to sidestep concerning prompts — including requests for high bridges in specific locations to jump off of.

Utah and Nevada previously passed similar bans limiting AI.AnnaStills – stock.adobe.com

Whereas chatbots affirm unequivocally regardless of the circumstance, therapists provide support and the means to help their patients improve, Vaile Wright, senior director for the office of health care innovation at the American Psychological Association, told the Washington Post.

“Therapists are validating, but it’s also our job to point out when somebody is engaging in unhealthy thoughts, feelings, behaviors and then help somebody challenge those and find better options,” Wright told the outlet.

The bans, though, are difficult to effectively enforce — and can’t prevent everyday people from turning to AI for mental health assistance on their own.

New research released in early August found that many bots like ChatGPT are inducing “AI psychosis” in unwitting users with no history of mental illnesses.

Some chatbots have allegedly contributed to users’ suicide attempts.PhotoGranary – stock.adobe.com

Roughly 75% of Americans have used some form of AI in the last six months, with 33% reporting daily usage for anything from help on homework to desperate romantic connections. This deep engagement is breeding psychological distress in heavy users, according to the digital marketing study.

Many youth, in particular, are falling down the chatbot rabbit hole and turning to machines to supplement human interaction.

Roughly 75% of Americans have used AI in some capacity over the last six months, according to one study.Vane Nunes – stock.adobe.com

Character.Ai, a popular platform where users can create and share chatbots usually based on fictional characters, had to place a warning clarifying that anything the bots say “should not be relied upon as fact or advice” after a Florida teen fell in love with his “Game of Thrones” AI character and took his own life.

The platform is still dealing with a lawsuit filed against the company for the teen’s death. Despite repeated attempts to dismiss it on First Amendment grounds, a federal judge ruled that the suit could move forward in August.

Another Texas family sued Character.Ai after a chatbot on the app named “Shonie” encouraged their autistic son to cut himself.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/13/us-news/illinois-becomes-third-state-to-restrict-use-of-ai-in-mental-health-industry-as-experts-warn-about-ai-psychosis/