Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Pfizer’s Early Metsera Data Leaves Analysts Wanting More

 

Analysts parsed the limited data available for Pfizer’s obesity candidate on the pharma’s fourth-quarter earnings call Tuesday, looking for any nugget of additional context.

A small dab of data for Pfizer’s Metsera-acquired obesity asset PF’3944 has provided the pharma what it needs to confidently launch a Phase III trial later this year, executives said. But analysts were far from sated after the limited release of information on Tuesday.

Prior to the earnings call this morning, Pfizer revealed that the newly named PF’3944—formerly MET-097i—achieved 12.3% weight loss in the Phase IIb VESPER-3 trial at week 28. The results come from the 4.8-mg and 3.2-mg dose arms, each of which involved monthly treatments. BMO Capital Markets called the data “competitive” in a note following the data release.

But feeding off a tidbit from Pfizer management—and repeated by Chief Scientific Officer Chris Boshoff on the Tuesday morning earnings call—Leerink Partners began to wonder later if the VESPER-3 results were less competitive than initially thought. The readout did not provide specific numbers for the placebo arm, though Boshoff stated on the call that that group’s weight was “stable.”

Assuming no weight gain or loss in the placebo patients means that on a placebo-adjusted basis—which has become the gold standard for analyst comparisons of different weight loss candidates—the absolute weight loss is around 12%, Leerink said Tuesday in a note delivered during the earnings call. Compare that to Eli Lilly’s Zepbound, which achieved 16% absolute weight loss at week 28.

Leerink also figures that VESPER-3 had a discontinuation rate of about 10%, which is higher than Zepbound’s 6%, although the latter study had hundreds more patients.

Analyst speculation aside, Boshoff said the study met its two main objectives: to show continued weight loss when switching from a weekly to a monthly dosing schedule and a positive safety and tolerability profile.

“For the first time, we have shown that GLP-1 receptor agonist peptides can be administered monthly, while maintaining the potential for competitive efficacy and sale,” CEO Albert Bourla added.

With the results for the lower doses in hand, Pfizer is now ready to move into Phase III with the highest 9.6-mg dose. That dose is already being studied in a trial that splits the amount into individual 2.4-mg doses for weekly administration, Boshoff explained.

While Pfizer does not yet have results for the 9.6-mg dose, the company is predicting weight loss of around 15.8%. Analysts and investors will have to wait until June when more details from the VESPER-3 study are revealed at the American Diabetes Association conference.

Missing Details

Boshoff declined to expand on the placebo group results, the demographics of trial participants or the duration of gastrointestinal adverse side effects. He did say that the study was conducted in the U.S. and that Pfizer is generally happy with the safety profile. The study revealed one severe case of nausea and no severe cases of diarrhea.

Pfizer has a robust clinical program planned for PF’3944, with two Phase III studies expected to start this year in patients who are overweight or have obesity. Another seven trials will dig into the drug’s effect on comorbidities of obesity and other ways to improve patient access and optionality.

When asked if PF’3944 could potentially be dosed even further apart than monthly, Boshoff said it’s possible—but Pfizer has yet to test that. The company is advancing a different molecule, a Phase I pro-drug peptide, that could be dosed as far apart as every three months, the chief scientist explained.

All told, Pfizer has 10 Phase III trials that will advance this year across its obesity portfolio, including in-house assets and those acquired via Metsera.

Chief Commercial Officer Aamir Malik insisted that the weight loss market has plenty of room for new players, particularly with higher weight loss, more convenient dosing or improved tolerability.

“What you need to win in a market like that is, one, you need a great portfolio of products that can serve all those patient needs. And two, you need really differentiated capabilities,” Malik said. “We have a lot of confidence in our ability to win commercially in this market with these assets.”

PF’3944 specifically is being aimed as a monthly maintenance therapy. Bourla said that Pfizer intends to test switching strategies for patients taking other GLP-1s in future studies.

A Mild Year for COVID

The VESPER-3 readout was by far the highlight of the conference call but Pfizer also reported what multiple analyst firms called “a solid quarter” with sales of $17.56 billion, beating the firm’s estimate of $16.79 billion, according to a Tuesday morning note.

“Commercially Pfizer printed another solid quarter, beating on both the top and bottom line supported across all three key pillars of the company,” BMO Capital Markets wrote in a Tuesday morning note.

The beat was driven by sales of Pfizer’s vaccine portfolio, including Comirnaty (COVID-19), Abrysvo (respiratory syncytial virus, RSV) and Prevnar (pneumococcal), while COVID-19 treatment Paxlovid was “notably light,” according to Guggenheim. BMO said Paxlovid fell 54% below consensus, with sales of $218 million for the quarter—a 70% drop from the same period a year earlier when sales were $727 million.

Bourla was nevertheless pleased with the COVID-19 franchise’s performance, given this year’s viral strain proved to be the least severe so far.

Pfizer reiterated previous guidance, with sales expected to be in the range of $59.5 billion to $62.5 billion for 2026.

CFO Dave Denton also noted that Pfizer’s previously stated $6 billion capacity for business development has actually gone up slightly, although he did not provide specific numbers.

https://www.biospace.com/business/pfizers-early-metsera-data-leaves-analysts-wanting-more

Belite: Anticipation of Phase 3 DRAGON trial data presentation at APAO sparks intraday surge

 The stock's sharp rise during regular market hours on February 3, 2026, builds on the January 29 announcement of Belite Bio's participation in the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology Congress (APAO) scheduled for February 5-7 in Hong Kong. There, the company will deliver an oral presentation on February 6 detailing topline results from the pivotal Phase 3 DRAGON trial of tinlarebant for adolescent Stargardt disease, which previously showed a 36% reduction in retinal lesions in December 2025 topline data. This event amplifies trader optimism ahead of a planned NDA filing in the first half of 2026, corroborated by elevated trading volume and social media discussions noting all-time highs. Recent analyst initiations in late January, including Buy ratings with targets up to $195, further support the momentum as investors position for potential regulatory progress.

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=BLTE&p=d

Reuters drops on AI threat to legal software, data stocks

 Thomson Reuters shares plunge nearly 11% in U.S. premarket trading Tuesday as Anthropic’s new AI legal tool and broader ‘SaaSpocalypse’ fears trigger heavy selling in legal software and data stocks.

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=TRI&p=d

Polaryx: Negative market reaction to preclinical data announcement triggered sharp intraday drop

 The stock experienced a significant drop during regular market hours on February 3, 2026, opening at $33.90 and closing at $23.29, amid heightened trading volume of approximately 48,000 shares compared to the debut day's 26,000. This movement came shortly after the company's 8:30 AM ET press release announcing a late-breaking oral presentation on preclinical data for PLX-200 in Krabbe disease at the ongoing WORLDSymposium (February 2-6). While the data supported advancing the Phase 2 SOTERIA trial—planned for launch in the first half of 2026—the market interpreted it as underwhelming, failing to provide breakthrough insights beyond prior FDA clearance in October 2025. This "sell the news" dynamic, amplified by retail chatter on social platforms labeling it a post-listing unwind, extended volatility from the February 2 Nasdaq debut, where shares closed down 22% from open after peaking at $48.91. Broader biotech sector pressures may have contributed, but the timing aligns directly with the announcement.

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=PLYX&p=d

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/novo-nordisk-shares-sink-after-sales-outlook-misses-us-glp-1-competition-intensifies

US futures up with tech, pharma earnings to come

 United States stock futures traded higher on Tuesday at the start of another busy earnings day. Big pharmaceutical companies are reporting today, including Perck, Pfizer and Amgen, with tech giants Paypal and AMD following after the market close. The JOLTS job openings release for December is also on the schedule shortly after the opening bell.

The Dow Jones increased by 0.13% at 4:14 am ET, the Nasdaq 100 gained 0.41% and the S&P 500 rose by 0.20%.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/US-futures-up-with-tech-pharma-earnings-to-come/65594020

Revolving Green Door: Ex Biden Officials' Jobs With Environmental NGOs After Funneling Money To Them

 As the Trump administration's Department of Energy moves to wipe out over $83 billion in "Green New Scam" loans and conditional commitments approved in the final months of the Biden administration, a new analysis reveals that not only did the rush to spend accelerate right after Biden's disastrous June 27, 2024 debate with now-President Donald Trump, senior Biden officials landed roles at organizations that received agency funding. In some cases, money was steered to NGOs that the officials worked for before joining the government - where they then returned following the cash bonanza. 

Following the debate where Biden revealed how cooked he is, nonprofit watchdog Democracy Restored found that billions of dollars began rushing out the door to over a dozen environmental and climate-focused NGOs, including that Alliance for Sustainable Energy, Climate United Fund, the Ocean Conservancy, the Nature Conservancy, and Rocky Mountain Institute, according to Just the News

Using data from USASpending.gov, Democracy Resorted found that federal agencies had obligated more than $600 million in taxpayer money to these organizations since July 1, 2024. The obligations began to drop the day after the election. Obligations to these same organizations since Nov. 5, 2024 fell to $246 million. 

While various agencies were providing millions in support to these organizations, high-level officials within the agencies either went to work for them after Trump took office, or they had previously worked for them prior to assuming key roles at the agencies under Biden. -JTN

Using data from USASpending.gov, Democracy Restored found that federal agencies obligated more than $600 million to environmental and climate-focused nonprofits beginning July 1, 2024 — including the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, Climate United Fund, Ocean Conservancy, Nature Conservancy, and Rocky Mountain Institute.

That flow of taxpayer cash slowed dramatically after the election. Since Nov. 5, 2024, obligations to the same organizations dropped to $246 million, according to the watchdog group.

At the same time, Democracy Restored identified a pattern that raised eyebrows: senior federal officials moving into roles at organizations that received agency funding — or having previously worked for them before holding key government posts.

I think the money being shoveled out after President Biden’s debate and the apparent revolving door of appointees going to recipients of these federal funds raises many questions about the timing of the money, the impact of special interests in the Biden administration and the general ethics surrounding this behavior," said Houston Keene, director of Democracy Restored, in comments to Just the News.

Loan office under fire

Scrutiny has focused on the Department of Energy’s Loans Programs Office, now renamed the Office of Energy Dominancy Financing.

In August 2024, the DOE awarded the World Resources Institute a $1 million grant aimed at supporting school bus fleet electrification training and collaboration.

Two former senior DOE officials are now senior fellows at the institute: Jigar Shah, who served as director of the Loans Programs Office, and Jennifer Wilcox, who was principal deputy assistant secretary at the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management.

Jigar Shah attends the 2024 TIME100 Gala (Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for TIME)

Shah’s tenure has drawn particular attention. The Washington Free Beacon reported in May that the Loans Programs Office approved a loan to Plug Power, a New York-based green hydrogen company, in May 2024.

According to the repoprt Shah’s private equity firm previously invested $100 million in Plug Power, and the company once described the firm as a “longstanding partner.” Shah told the Beacon that he did not work directly on Plug Power’s loan and said the company applied before he joined the office.

An Office of Inspector General audit released in December found that 20% of Loans Programs Office employees reviewed had a potential conflict of interest - or the appearance of impaired impartiality - while performing their duties.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright testified in May that the office issued roughly $40 billion in loans over the prior 15 years, but that figure ballooned to $100 billion in just the final 76 days of the Biden administration. Wright said those rushed loan agreements lacked safeguards traditionally required by the DOE.

The revolving door keeps spinning

Democracy Restored’s review identified other examples of officials cycling between government agencies and nonprofit recipients.

Renee Stone, formerly in senior leadership roles at NOAA, now serves as vice president of climate for the Audubon Society. During the Biden administration, Audubon received nearly $4 million across three grants for habitat restoration projects.

Monica Medina, another former NOAA official, is now a distinguished fellow at Conservation International, which received a $9 million grant in 2023 for an ecosystem restoration project in Hawaii.

Chetan Hebbale, once a policy adviser in the White House, later joined the Nature Conservancy as a climate and conservation finance policy adviser. The organization received more than $6 million in federal funding during Biden’s term.

Federal ethics law restricts certain post-government actions by former senior officials, but it does not prohibit them from accepting employment with private or nonprofit organizations — even those that received government funding.

Keene emphasized that there is no evidence any of these individuals directly worked on the grants in question, but said the relationships warrant closer examination.

Offshore wind ties raise questions

The Biden administration’s aggressive push for 30 gigawatts of offshore wind also drew scrutiny.

Oceans Conservancy, a vocal supporter of offshore wind expansion, received nearly $6 million in two grants from NOAA during the Biden years. The group has also received support from Orsted, a major offshore wind developer.

Susan Ruffo, who previously served as managing director of international initiatives at Oceans Conservancy, later worked for NOAA and other federal agencies.

“I think it says a lot about the stewardship of tax dollars under the Biden administration,” Keene said. “If you were an organization that agreed with the administration politically, they weren’t afraid to cut you a check. That’s a problem for the taxpayer.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/revolving-green-door-former-biden-officials-landed-jobs-environmental-ngos-after