Search This Blog

Saturday, April 11, 2026

'Pro-Iran gov influencer: US demands 400kg uranium exit, zero enrichment and Hormuz control'

 


Pro-government influencer Ali Gholhaki said on Saturday the US is demanding the exit of 400 kg of uranium from Iran — "the same stockpile it failed to seize in a previous military operation" — along with 0% enrichment and full management of the Strait of Hormuz.

"A test today on the strait met a firm Iranian rejection. No US commitments on Lebanon, indicating Washington did not come for genuine negotiations," he posted on X.


https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202604067622 

Trump Confounds Critics Again

by Francis P. Sempra

President Donald Trump has once again confounded his many critics by agreeing to a two-week ceasefire in the war against Iran, after threatening to bomb Iran back to the Stone Age and end a civilization.

On the right, former Trump supporter and former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene said that Trump had gone “insane.” Andrew Day in The American Conservative suggested that Trump might use nuclear weapons against Iran. Bruce Fein characterized Trump’s attacks on Iran as “unconstitutional” and “criminal.” Steven Simon in Responsible Statecraft accused Trump of threatening genocide in Iran. 

On the left, Sen. Chuck Schumer said Trump resembled “an unhinged madman.” Sen. Bernie Sanders called Trump “dangerous and mentally unbalanced.” Representative Ro Khanna accused Trump of “threatening war crimes.” Charlie Savage in the New York Times called Trump’s threats “self-incriminating statements” for a future war crimes trial. Some critics have suggested invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. 

Trump’s threat was to bomb Iran’s infrastructure — bridges, desalination plants, power plants. These are the kinds of targets that were routinely bombed during World War II, yet Trump’s critics claim that deliberately striking them would be a war crime. All of those targets affect Iran’s ability to make war. Judged by this standard, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman were war criminals — after all, they oversaw and countenanced the deliberate bombing of civilians in Germany and Japan. 

And if the current Iran war is unconstitutional because Congress did not declare war, so was the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the first Gulf War, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the early 2000s, and many other lesser conflicts that have been waged by American presidents without a congressional declaration of war. The Constitution, after all, does not mention congressional resolutions or authorizations that previous presidents have used to wage war.

Those same critics warned us last June that Trump’s authorization to attack Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities would lead to a quagmire and another “endless war” in the Middle East that Trump had campaigned against. Trump confounded the critics then by stopping the war after 12 days once the objective was accomplished.

Now, Trump has confounded the critics again. One hour before the attack that could end Iran’s civilization was to begin, Trump announced a two-week ceasefire to allow for peace negotiations to continue. Presumably, those negotiations are making some progress, otherwise Trump would have ordered the civilization-ending bombing to start. If we have learned anything about Trump during his presidencies, it is that he does not bluff.

Writing in Foreign Policy, hardly a MAGA journal, Rand strategic analyst Raphael Cohen takes a more balanced and less unhinged view of the progress of the Iran war than Trump’s many critics. Cohen writes that the Iran war is not a “debacle,” rather it is a “dilemma” like all wars. Operationally, he writes, the war is going reasonably well, noting that the U.S. and Israel “have made significant progress toward achieving [their] objectives” of destroying Iran’s missiles and missile industry, destroying Iran’s navy, degrading Iran’s proxy network, and further degrading Iran’s ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. Diplomatically, the Gulf states have sided with the U.S. and Israel against Iran.

The major dilemma is the Strait of Hormuz, the closure of which is wreaking havoc on the world’s energy markets. Trump’s ceasefire agreement is designed to resolve that dilemma. If the diplomatic route fails, Cohen writes, the U.S. has three options: walk away and declare victory, which would leave Iran in control of the Strait; continue the air campaign, which might bring Iran’s leaders back to the negotiating table; and escalation, which could topple the regime but risks increased costs and “unintended consequences.” 

As in most wars, there is likely no perfect solution. But, Cohen writes, the war “is not the catastrophe that some make it out to be, nor is the United States stuck in a quagmire.” Iran’s threat to the region has been scaled-back. Any solution — military or negotiated — is likely to be temporary — that is the way international relations usually work.

https://spectator.org/trump-confounds-critics-again/

A Playbook for Mass Deportations

 When Donald Trump accepted the GOP’s nomination for president in 2024, he boldly stated that “the Republican platform promises to launch the largest deportation operation in the history of the country.” It was music to the ears of tens of millions of Americans who lived through the Biden border invasion and experienced decades of sustained illegal immigration with little interior enforcement. Finally, a political leader had the gumption to say, “Enough is enough,” and proclaim that it is time for millions of illegal aliens to go home. The American people rewarded Trump’s courage when they decisively re-elected him.

Unfortunately, the second Trump Administration has not lived up to the promises made in that July 2024 speech in Milwaukee. It has instead prioritized removing the worst criminal illegal aliens. With that population estimated at between 500,000 and 800,000 individuals, the administration has focused enforcement resources on a small subset of illegals, prioritizing quality over quantity. But this is a misguided attempt to assuage the concerns of a radical—but sizable—segment of Americans who do not believe in borders or in sovereignty.

The American public has witnessed widespread obstruction of immigration enforcement, record violence targeting ICE agents, and significant resistance by state and local governments in Democratic strongholds. Democratic Party elected officials and their left-wing base are very clear that the tolerable number of deportations is zero. They were never going to support anything resembling a mass deportation operation.

But what about the tens of millions of Americans who do support President Trump’s promised deportation agenda?

The administration’s prioritization of the “worst first” has unintentionally created a de facto enforcement amnesty for aliens unlawfully present in the United States who have not committed a subsequent crime. DHS data indicate that in 2025, ICE deported fewer than 350,000 illegal aliens. This is not the mass deportation agenda the American people voted for.

President Trump deserves credit for securing the southwest border and all but stopping the flow of illegal aliens into the United States. But much more needs to be done on interior enforcement to effectuate an actual mass deportation agenda that the president promised on the campaign trail.

Enter the Mass Deportation Coalition. This coalition was organized in February 2026 in response to political, operational, legal, and physical attacks on deportation operations. Our purpose is to support President Trump’s signature campaign promise to carry out the largest deportation operation in American history. The Mass Deportation Coalition is composed of immigration law and policy experts (including those affiliated with The Claremont Institute’s Center for the American Way of Life), former senior and rank-and-file law enforcement officials, advocates, and supporters of immigration enforcement. We are growing and regularly adding new members to the coalition. 

Last week, the Coalition published its Playbook, a comprehensive menu of policy, operational, and logistical options that would allow the Trump Administration to carry out a minimum of 1,000,000 deportations in 2026 so that all illegal aliens can be deported in the years to come.

We are united around five key principles:

1) Moving from the Phase I “worst of the worst” interior enforcement prioritization to Phase II mass deportations, with a focus on populations that are easier to remove, such as deportable aliens with final orders of removal and visa overstays.

2) Significantly ramping up worksite enforcement.

3) Utilizing a whole-of-government approach (including tax and banking tools) to leverage existing authorities in multiple federal agencies to increase the number of removals and self-deportations.

4) Providing the American public with complete data transparency on immigration numbers.

5) Coming to a shared understanding of what counts as a deportation.

The Playbook makes policy and operational suggestions based on the assumption that Congress will not change U.S. immigration laws. For decades, Congress has been unable—or unwilling—to pass meaningful legislation to address the immigration crisis in America, and it would be dishonest to assume it could do so in today’s political climate.

The Coalition’s Playbook is drawn from combined decades of experience in federal law enforcement, military logistics, government contracting, and large-scale transportation operations. We recognize that carrying out a true mass deportation operation requires immense resources to screen millions of cases, locate and apprehend individuals, detain them, and transport aliens out of the country within the timeframe this campaign demands.

The centerpiece for accomplishing this goal is an aggressive worksite enforcement campaign. President Trump frequently cites the successful interior enforcement operations of the Eisenhower Administration as a model for his mass deportation agenda. That administration aggressively targeted worksites that employed illegal aliens, ultimately removing a sizable percentage of illegals then living in the United States.

Conservative estimates suggest there are between 10.8 and 11.1 million illegal aliens currently working in the United States—which demonstrates the lax nature of worksite enforcement. For decades, ICE worksite arrests of illegals have been in the hundreds or low thousands of individuals annually. Historically, worksite operations have produced arrests that were not followed by timely deportation, undermining both deterrence and public confidence.

Ramping up worksite enforcement would accomplish multiple goals simultaneously. First, it would curtail the main incentive to illegal immigration by foreclosing economic opportunity for illegal aliens. Second, robust worksite enforcement accompanied by an aggressive employer sanctions program would send a message to employers who employ illegal labor that there are significant consequences for violating the law. Finally, since it is well known which industries employ illegal labor, worksite enforcement is an operationally low-risk use of resources, likely leading to a high number of interior removals.

Other Playbook recommendations include significantly expanding immigration detention, reforming and streamlining asylum cases, debanking illegal aliens, modernizing and standardizing data collection, and aggressively prosecuting lawbreaking and fighting back against left-wing lawfare. These represent a whole-of-government approach that uses the vast, but not unlimited, resources of the federal government to fulfill President Trump’s core campaign promise. 

Mass deportations and major elements of the Playbook are immensely popular with the American people. Members of the Coalition commissioned a poll of likely voters and found widespread support (66%) for deporting migrants who enter the country illegally. It also found overwhelming support—north of 70%—for the idea that the United States has an obligation to enforce the immigration laws enacted by Congress. A similar number of Americans support aggressive immigration operational tools, including enhanced worksite enforcement, penalizing employers that hire illegal labor, the widespread use of E-Verify, and regular audits of businesses that knowingly employ illegal labor. 

As we approach our country’s 250th birthday, the central question for American citizens is whether they want to preserve America for Americans, with fidelity to the Constitution and the rule of law. Decades of mass illegal migration have upended labor markets, caused cultural and civil fragmentation, overwhelmed local schools and hospitals, and brought crime and disorder to American communities.

President Trump promised mass deportations to the American people. The Mass Deportation Coalition Playbook provides the roadmap for the Trump Administration to fulfill its core campaign promise and provide the policy framework needed to remove illegal aliens from the United States.

 is the general counsel of the Oversight Project and a 2025 Claremont Institute Lincoln Fellow. The Oversight Project is a member of the Mass Deportation Coalition.

https://americanmind.org/memo/a-playbook-for-mass-deportations/

Machete-wielder stabs 3 elderly straphangers at Grand Central

 A chronic criminal slashed three elderly people with a machete — while calling himself “Lucifer” — in an unprovoked attack and was fatally shot by cops at Grand Central Terminal Saturday morning, police said. 

An 85-year-old man and a 65-year-old man were slashed in their heads on the 4, 5, 6 subway platform at the iconic station at 9:50 a.m., police said. A 70-year-old woman was also slashed, but it wasn’t clear where on her body, cops said.

Blood-soaked white gauze was wrapped around one victim’s head, photos from the scene show. The slasher was also seen being carried away on a gurney.

The machete used in the attack is displayed during a press conference held by NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch at Grand Central Terminal.Luiz C. Ribeiro for NY Post
Cops fatally shot a man at Grand Central Terminal after he stabbed three people with a machete.Luiz C. Ribeiro for NY Post

Two NYPD detectives, who were working overtime to provide transit security, confronted the 44-year-old, identified as Anthony Griffin, and told him to drop the machete.

“From the top of the stairs, they observed the individual on the platform, and they immediately ordered him to drop the knife,” Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said at a news conference at the scene. “The individual was armed with a large knife described as a machete and was behaving erratically, repeatedly stating that he was Lucifer.”

Griffin refused to comply “with at least 20 orders to drop the knife,” she said.

Officers also “attempted to deescalate” and offer assistance, saying “We are going to get you help,” Tisch told reporters.

But Griffin advanced toward them with the blade extended, she said.

“One officer discharged his firearm striking the perpetrator twice,” Tisch said.

The victims were taken to local hospitals in stable condition, cops said.

The perp, Anthony Griffin, was pronounced dead after being taken to Bellevue Hospital.Obtained by NY Post
Griffin has 13 prior arrests.Luiz C. Ribeiro for NY Post

Griffin was taken to Bellevue Hospital and was pronounced dead a short time later, cops said.

He has 13 prior arrests, including one for menacing with a sharp object, police sources said.

The two officers were taken to the hospital for treatment of tinnitus, cops said.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani said in a post on X that he was “grateful to the NYPD for their quick response and for preventing additional violence.”

FDNY, NYPD and MTA personnel remove the attacker after he was shot by police, on April 11, 2026.Luiz C. Ribeiro for NY Post

“The NYPD is conducting an internal investigation and will release body-worn camera footage, as it does in all incidents involving the discharge of an officer’s firearm,” he said.

Claudio Delgado, 53, was in the main hall of Grand Central when the chaos erupted after getting off his train from Connecticut to visit his mother in the hospital.

“I was coming from Connecticut when ‘Boom!’ everyone got down on the floor fast,” the 53-year-old said. “Then the police said, ‘Get outta here! Get outta here fast!’ They said it was somebody with a gun and police were involved too. It’s scary. This is how New York City is now. It’s too much violence in New York City now.”

A worker at the station, who declined to give his name, was also rattled.

“I saw them [paramedics], they came up with somebody on the stretcher, and they were pumping his chest,” he said. “It’s crazy. You could be on the platform minding your business, and someone had a machete, it’s scary, scary, scary.”

Worker Jessica Munoz, who’s employed at the Bourke Street Bakery near the subway entrance, saw people running out of the station at East 42nd Street and Lexington Avenue.

“I was scared, we don’t know what we can do, we just see the people running, and I asked the guy and he said there was a shooting downstairs,” she said. “It’s scary, we didn’t know what we could do. It’s crazy.”

https://nypost.com/2026/04/11/us-news/nyc-cops-shoot-machete-wielding-stabber-at-grand-central-station-halting-weekend-trains/

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/three-supertankers-carrying-iraqi-and-saudi-crude-exit-strait-hormuz

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/netanyahu-says-israel-will-continue-fight-iran-proxies-unlike-appeaser-erdogan

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Iran-denies-US-ships-crossed-strait/66049901