Search This Blog

Friday, September 9, 2022

Regeneron could reap big rewards from high-dose Eylea

 Regeneron’s 19% stock surge yesterday added $12bn to its market cap, taking its valuation higher than that of the pharma giant GSK; investors were clearly impressed with data on high-dose Eylea. Two crucial pivotal trials succeeded in showing that the project, given at four-monthly intervals, worked as well as the original formulation, dosed every two months. Long-acting Eylea is a vital component of Regeneron’s defence against biosimilars, which could start in the US in 2024. And because the high-dose product will probably be filed under a new BLA it might be exempt from Medicare price negotiations. Analysts reckon the high-dose product could also help fend off a new rival, Roche’s bispecific Vabysmo, which is also available at long dosing intervals. SVB Securities pointed out that 77% of wet AMD patients managed to stay on high-dose Eylea dosed every four months, versus 45% for Vabysmo on this schedule. Echoing upgrades from across the sellside the bank substantially hiked future Eylea forecasts, adding a huge 30% to their 2030 estimate, to $17bn. Still, Roche recently presented two-year data showing that 45% had improved to 60% at two years, so the Vabysmo threat is far from neutralised.

Eylea vs Vabysmo in wet AMD
 Pulsar (NCT04423718)Tenaya (NCT03823287)Lucerne (NCT03823300)
DrugEylea (control)Eylea
8mg
Eylea
8mg
Eylea
2mg (control)
VabysmoEylea
2mg (control)
Vabysmo
RegimenQ8wkQ12wkQ16wkQ8wkVariableQ8wkVariable
N336335338337334337331
Mean observed BCVA improvement (letters)7.66.76.26.65.85.16.6
   LS mean difference in BCVA improvement (primary endpoint) -0.97-1.14 0.7 0.0
   Non-inferiority p-value* 0.00090.0011    
Patients maintained on dosing interval, without need for regimen modification 79%77% 45%** 45%**
*Non-inferiority (1-sided) p-values are for the difference in least squares mean compared to Eylea with margin of 4 letters. **16wk regimen. BCVA=best corrected visual acuity; LS=least square. 

 

Eylea vs Vabysmo in diabetic macular oedema 
 Photon (NCT04429503)Yosemite (NCT03622580)Rhine (NCT03622593)
DrugEylea (control)Eylea
8mg
Eylea
8mg
Eylea (control)Vaby-smoVabysmoEylea (control)Vaby-smoVabysmo
RegimenQ8wkQ12wkQ16wkQ8wkQ8wkVariableQ8wkQ8wkVariable
N167328163312315313315317319
Mean observed BCVA improvement (letters)9.28.87.910.910.711.610.311.810.8
   LS mean difference in BCVA improvement (primary endpoint) -0.6-1.4 -0.20.7 1.50.5
   Non-inferiority p-value* <0.00010.0031      
Patients maintained on dosing interval, without need for regimen modification 91%89%      
*Non-inferiority (1-sided) p-values are for the difference in least squares mean compared to Eylea with margin of 4 letters. Yosemite and Rhine data are averages of weeks 48, 52 and 56. BCVA=best corrected visual acuity; LS=least square.

https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/trial-results-snippets/regeneron-could-reap-big-rewards-high-dose-eylea

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.