Democrats Melt Down After Supreme Court Restricts Race Based Gerrymandering

 The response from Democrats to the Supreme Court's decision to strike down race-based gerrymandering has been predictable - running high in emotion and devoid of objectivity.  The Democrat Party has understood for a long time that much of their power comes from inserting themselves as the spokespeople for the supposed "have-nots".  Racial hysteria being a key weapon in their arsenal to push the ongoing socialization of America. 

Its the reason why left-wing NGO's have been dumping millions of dollars into the very "hate groups" they claim to be fighting against.  Leftists need racism as a bogeyman; they have no power without it.  

It makes sense that Democrats are clinging to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which prohibits voting practices (including redistricting maps) that result in denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of race.  The assumption being that minorities (specifically black Americans) require rigged districts where they are the majority in order to maintain power in government.  

This obviously benefits Democrats, with around 83% of blacks voting blue in recent elections.  Predominantly black districts in states across the US have acted as assured seats in the House for Dems since 1965.  In 1982, Congress strengthened Section 2 by amending it to clarify that plaintiffs only need to prove that a voting practice has a discriminatory result (effect), not just the intent.

Republicans sided with Democrats in a grand virtue signal, but the results of the strengthened VRA have harmed conservatives ever since.  The Supreme Court's recent 6-3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais ends this 45-year-long mistake, at least, for the most part.    

The decision sets a precedent which largely eliminates the use of frivolous race-based challenges to redistricting maps and will lead to a loss of 12-19 House seats for Democrats over the next two years.  States which are planning to adjust their maps in light of the Supreme Court ruling include Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Alabama.  A few other red states are looking into potential changes before 2028.

The Democrat reaction has been an absolute meltdown.  Impending district map changes threaten a loss of around 12 seats in the near term.

The underlying narrative promoted by the political left is that the ruling will result in black Americans losing the right to vote.  Chuck Schumer insinuates this in his frantic response, calling the decision a "return to Jim Crow". 

This is, of course, a fallacy.  No black citizen is losing their right to vote.  In fact, the Supreme Court ruling confirms that black voters and white voters are equal and that rigged districts based on race are not necessary.  Raging over the proposition of losing political power, Democrats are now calling for "packing the courts" as a means to dilute the Supreme Court and assert total control over districts and elections (a typical appeal to lawfare). 

Hakeem Jeffries called the Supreme Court a disgrace and said "everything is on the table" to undermine their decision. 

Other Dems echoed this strategy.  Their plan?  If they can't rig districts, they will rig the courts.

It should be noted that the political left only calls for these kinds of extreme measures when the court rules in favor of conservatives.  Objective positions and nuances within court decisions are not tolerated.  The threat is clear:  "Rule with us, or we will get revenge..."

Other left-wing politicians argue that the Supreme Court "has no authority" to change the VRA because they are not "elected".  When Democrats start to sound like activist libertarians, you know they're scared.

In the sprint to the Midterms the district changes will likely be minimal, but enough to potentially thwart a Democrat majority.  In 2028, the game could change dramatically.  Former President Barack Obama was lambasted for attacking the Supreme Court ruling, just days after cutting ads for a Virginia effort to transform that state's map into a 10-1 Democratic advantage. 

Top Illinois Democrats called the precedent a ‘crushing blow to our democracy', despite the fact that Illinois is widely considered gerrymandered to benefit Democrats.  It's only okay when they do it, not when conservatives do it.  

The Democrat response is a reminder that, if the political left ever returns to substantial government power as they had under the Biden Administration, they will break every rule and violate every principle in order to keep control.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-melt-down-after-supreme-court-restricts-race-based-gerrymandering