Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

More Patients Turning to ‘Direct Primary Care

Having quick access to a primary care doctor 24/7 is very appealing to Mick Lowderman, 56, who is married with two children, ages 10 and 8. He pays a monthly membership fee to AtlasMD, a direct primary care practice in Wichita, KS.
Primary care is built on the long-term relationship between clinicians and patients. A 10- to 15-minute patient visit doesn’t support that relationship, Sullivan says.
When Kevin Boyd, 64, fell on his stairs in Wichita and broke three ribs, he didn’t go the emergency room. Instead, he called Umbehr, who told him to come to his office. He referred Boyd nearby for an X-ray and dispensed pain medications at his office. The total cost was $70.
In contrast, the first time Boyd fell and broke his ribs, he had Blue Cross Blue Shield and drove himself to the ER, where he saw the ER doctor, a radiologist for an MRI, and got shots for his pain. The total bill was $14,000, and he paid $2,600.
“I don’t put off care the way I used to because of the money I save,” says Boyd, who joined AtlasMD in 2015.
For his monthly membership fee of $75, Boyd gets several benefits, including unlimited 24/7 access to Umbehr by text, email, or phone, extended same- or next-day office visits, and free diagnostic tests and office procedures, such as EKGs, DEXA scans, and body fat analysis. If Boyd gets really sick and needs a house call, or if he needs a phone consult when traveling, those are also included in the fee.
“It’s awesome that I can call or text Dr. Josh Umbehr when my children are sick and that I have a solution before they leave for school,” he says.
For example, when one child woke up coughing recently, Mick and his wife, Jennifer, contacted ‘Dr. Josh,’ who asked them to put her on the phone to hear her cough and then take a picture of her throat and text it to him.
“He prescribed an antibiotic, which we picked up at his office the same day.”
Umbehr is part of a growing movement of primary care doctors, including those in family, internal, and geriatric medicine, who want to practice more personalized comprehensive medicine without the burden of dealing with insurance in a traditional fee-for-service system. Most choose to not accept health insurance and charge patients a membership fee instead.
“When you look at direct primary care and other models that are cropping up, it points to our broken system that doctors don’t want to practice in and are looking for alternate solutions ― and so are patients,” says Erin Sullivan, PhD, research and curriculum director at the Center for Primary Care at Harvard Medical School.
Umbehr is in Kansas, one of 44 states that allow doctors to directly dispense medications with the exception of controlled substances. Boyd pays $2 and $3 for typically a 3-month supply of common generic medications that he can pick up at AtlasMD or have mailed to him.
Another way Umbehr saves patients money is through contracting with specialists who agree to give his patients discounted rates. For example, when Umbehr sent Boyd for an ultrasound of a possible blood clot in his leg, he was billed $120.
The popularity of these alternative models is growing. DPC Frontier, which tracks the number of direct primary care practices nationally, estimates there are 1,219 practices in 48 states and Washington, D.C. They range in size from solo practitioners to corporate, multisite direct primary care organizations with thousands of doctors, Sullivan says.
The American Academy of Family Physicians supports the direct primary care model “as a potentially powerful disruptor in the health care payment environment that has traditionally undervalued family medicine and comprehensive care,” the group says on its website.
But there are drawbacks and concerns to be aware of. For one, the monthly fee is in addition to any insurance for major medical problems. While many doctors and patients claim the direct care model results in better health outcomes, there are no studies proving that, according to an editorial in The Journal of the American Medical Association. Because it is a retainer operation, too, the model encourages doctors to target healthier patients, while others charge more for patients who have more needs.
As a premed student, I spent time in a brilliant surgeon’s practice who never figured out the business side of fee-for-service insurance with all the billing and coding. That was a peek into a bad business model. Josh Umbehr, MD, CEO of AtlasMD in Wichita, KS
The American College of Physicians, too, warned in its policy paper on the practice that the direct care model can “potentially exacerbate racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in health care and impose too high a cost burden on some lower-income patients.”
Umbehr chose to establish a direct primary care practice right out of residency. “As a premed student, I spent time in a brilliant surgeon’s practice who never figured out the business side of fee-for-service insurance with all the billing and coding. That was a peek into a bad business model.”
While the membership payment model in concierge medicine appealed to him, “we wanted an affordable version for the masses.” Concierge primary care practices offer similar outpatient services and amenities to members but typically charge higher membership fees, and many also bill insurers.
Direct primary care practices charge an average monthly fee of $78, while concierge practices charge an average monthly fee of $183.00. Umbehr also saves money on overhead with no front office or administrative staff and one registered nurse for each of AtlasMD’s five doctors. “There’s a good chance one of us will answer the phone,” he says
Umbehr limits his patient volume to 700, compared to a typical “in-network” primary care doctor who sees 2,500-3,000 patients total. This allows him to see five to six patients a day instead of 20 or more seen in a typical primary care office.
Lowderman and Boyd say that Umbehr can take care of most of their health care needs, including minor office procedures that don’t require anesthesia or sedation. If needed, they will pay cash for a specialist or use their major-medical insurance plan if something more serious happens. Major-medical plans, sometimes also called catastrophic insurance, will cover things like trauma care, emergency surgeries, and more. They feature low monthly premiums and high deductibles.
Lowderman, who has 12 employees in his pest control business, pays AtlasMD $50 per employee monthly to provide primary care services to them. Because he also gets customized major medical insurance through AtlasMD, he pays a total of $375.00 monthly per employee. Traditional employer insurance would have been double or triple the cost, he says.

Managing Care

When Umbehr started his practice a decade ago, Mike Scheidt and his wife, Jolene, (now deceased) were among his first patients. “I don’t know if I would have joined if my wife had not been so sick with cancer and he could streamline perfunctory things,” Scheidt says.
For example, Jolene had frequent urinary tract infections. “Before Dr. Umbehr, we would call her internist and he would tell us to come down to the clinic to do the lab work. My wife had one leg and a half amputated due to infection. I was an executive with Raytheon at the time and would have to take time off from work, hire a home health nurse to collect the urine specimen and drop it off, wait 3 days to get the lab results, and then go to Walgreens to pick up Bactrim, which always worked.”
When Umbehr became their primary care doctor, Jolene would call him up and mention a UTI, and he would start her on Bactrim, which he often dropped off at their house on his way home. Then, a lab technician or home health nurse the Scheidts hired would collect the urine specimen for analysis to confirm the diagnosis.
“She didn’t need to leave the house! I finally felt like she was being treated like a head of state. My wife told me many times that dealing with such serious matters wasn’t as scary with Dr. Umbehr shepherding her through difficult medical situations,” Scheidt says. “That alone was worth a pot of gold to her, and certainly to me as well.”

Leaving Traditional Insurance

Jeffrey S. Gold, MD, opened Gold Direct Care in 2015 in Marblehead, MA, after being employed as a family medicine doctor by North Shore Medical Center in Boston for 7 years. “It was a typical insurance-based practice where I was seeing 20 to 22 patients a day. I wanted to practice medicine and not insurance paperwork, billing, and coding.”
Gold was feeling burned out at age 36. “I was thinking of either quitting medicine completely or teaching at a local medical school. I saw no sustainability in seeing people in 10-minute increments daily for the rest of my career.”
Two years later, he left North Shore.
He read about Umbehr’s practice online and then visited him in Wichita to see it firsthand and decided to adopt a similar model. However, “there are differences between Wichita and Boston ― this area is heavy with big hospital systems that are insurance-based. Employers equate insurance with care, and trying to educate them about the value of this different primary care model is challenging.” [MORE}
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/925053#vp_1

EXACT Sciences EPS beats by $0.87, misses on revenue

EXACT Sciences (NASDAQ:EXAS): Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.54 beats by $0.87.
Revenue of $295.6M (+106.7% Y/Y) misses by $2.04M.
Shares -2.9%.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3540726-exact-sciences-eps-beats-0_87-misses-on-revenue

Pfizer axes license agreement with GlycoMimetics

In the wake of a failed late-stage study evaluating rivipansel for the treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease patients, Pfizer (PFE +0.4%) has notified licensor GlycoMimetics (GLYC +1.7%) that it will terminate their 2011 agreement.
GLYC will regain all rights to respective assets and will incur no termination penalties related to the end of the partnership.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3540669-pfizer-axes-license-agreement-glycomimetics

CDC mistakenly clears 13th US coronavirus case

The 13th U.S. coronavirus case was confirmed Feb. 10, though CDC officials initially cleared the patient by mistake, according to a UC San Diego Health statement.
CDC officials said Feb. 9 that four American evacuees — assessed for coronavirus after returning from China — tested negative for the respiratory infection. The patients were discharged and returned to quarantine at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar.
However, on Feb. 10, CDC officials said further testing revealed one of the four patients actually did have the virus, now named “Covid-19,” according to CNBC. The individual returned to UC San Diego Health, along with another evacuee showing possible coronavirus symptoms. Both patients are in isolation and have minimal symptoms.
The infected evacuee left the hospital wearing a mask, and marshals transporting the patient wore protective gear as well, according to a Feb. 10 hospital statement cited by The San Diego Union Tribune. It is not known exactly how long the patient was at the base before officials realized the test result was actually positive.
As of 9 a.m., Feb. 11, there are 43,141 confirmed coronavirus cases and 1,018 related deaths.
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality/cdc-mistakenly-clears-13th-us-coronavirus-case.html

Four Sanofi executives to depart in revamp

Bloomberg reports that four senior executives will be leaving Sanofi (SNY -0.1%) as a consequence of CEO Paul Hudon’s revamp.
Dominique Carouge, EVP, Business Transformation
Kathleen Tregoning, EVP, External Affairs
Dieter Weinand, EVP, Primary Care
Ameet Nathwani, M.D., EVP, Chief Medical Officer and Chief Digital Officer
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3540643-four-sanofi-executives-to-depart-bloomberg

InfuSystem Enters Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market

InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (NYSE American: INFU) (“InfuSystem” or the “Company”), a leading national health care service provider, facilitating outpatient care for durable medical equipment (“DME”) manufacturers and health care providers, announced today that it has entered into an agreement whereby it will add Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (“NPWT”) to its Integrated Therapy Service (“ITS”) platform.  As part of the new relationship, InfuSystem’s turnkey solutions will include providing the durable medical equipment, overseeing logistics, biomedical services, and managing third-party billing.
Richard DiIorio, chief executive officer of InfuSystem, said, “We are pleased to announce the addition of NPWT to the Integrated Therapy Services platform, joining our existing therapies, oncology and pain management.  This addition results from a premier global health care services company seeking out InfuSystem and our unique expertise in providing clinic-to-home DME solutions.  The core market to be targeted under the new agreement is U.S. home health care, which as a subset of the broader NPWT market, has an estimated addressable market of $600 million per year.”
“We are excited to collaborate with a Top-10 health care services company on this new therapy and we look forward to a long and successful relationship,” Mr. DiIorio continued.  “As seen with past new business wins, the nature of our ITS business involves an initial period of on-boarding the participating facilities.  We will soon begin that on-boarding, but we do not expect to see meaningful revenue from NPWT until the second half of this year.  It should be noted that NPWT was not part of the Company’s previously announced full-year 2020 financial guidance.  We plan to update this guidance in the coming quarters,” concluded Mr. DiIorio.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (“NPWT”) is a therapeutic technique using vacuum dressing to promote healing of acute and chronic wounds.  Examples of acute wounds treated include those from surgery and c-sections, and chronic wounds treated include pressure ulcers, trophic, and vascular ulcers.  The U.S. market for NPWT therapy is estimated to exceed $2 billion by 2024.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/infusystem-enters-negative-pressure-wound-113010550.html

Caterpillar reopens most Chinese facilities

Caterpillar (CAT +1.8%) is one of today’s top gainers on the Dow Jones after the company reopened most of its facilities in China after receiving approval from the local government following the coronavirus outbreak.
None of CAT’s factories are in the worst affected province, but the company had delayed reopening by a week after the Lunar New Year; China accounts for ~10% of Caterpillar’s global sales.
Industrial names in general are performing well today: DE +1.3%, CMI +1.1%.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3540633-caterpillar-reopens-chinese-facilities