Search This Blog

Saturday, December 12, 2020

3/4 attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazilian Amazon during largely unmitigated epidemic

 See all authors and affiliations

Science  08 Dec 2020:
eabe9728
DOI: 10.1126/science.abe9728
PDF: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/early/2020/12/07/science.abe9728.full.pdf&hl=en&sa=T&oi=ucasa&ct=ufr&ei=WHrVX979DcedywScwIm4AQ&scisig=AAGBfm2eIRuOek-JA40VYwHQ6fcvEH8vGQ

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 spread rapidly in the Brazilian Amazon and the attack rate there is an estimate of the final size of a largely unmitigated epidemic. We use a convenience sample of blood donors to show that by June, one month after the epidemic peak in Manaus, capital of Amazonas state, 44% of the population had detectable IgG antibodies. Correcting for cases without a detectable antibody response and antibody waning, we estimate a 66% attack rate in June, rising to 76% in October. This is higher than in São Paulo, in southeastern Brazil, where the estimated attack rate in October is 29%. These results confirm that, when poorly controlled, COVID-19 can infect a high fraction of the population causing high mortality.


https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/12/07/science.abe9728.abstract

Harvard Med School scientists undo age-related vision loss, eye damage from glaucoma in mice

 Harvard Medical School scientists report they have successfully restored vision in mice by turning back the clock on aged eye cells in the retina to recapture youthful gene function.

The team’s work, described Dec. 2 in the publication Nature, represents the first demonstration that it may be possible to safely reprogram complex tissues, such as the nerve cells of the eye, to an earlier age.  

In addition to resetting the cells’ aging clock, the researchers successfully reversed vision loss in animals with a condition mimicking human glaucoma, a leading cause of blindness around the world. 

The achievement represents the first successful attempt to reverse glaucoma-induced vision loss, rather than merely stem its progression, the team said. 

If replicated through further studies, the approach could pave the way for therapies to promote tissue repair across various organs and reverse aging and age-related diseases in humans.

“Our study demonstrates that it’s possible to safely reverse the age of complex tissues such as the retina and restore its youthful biological function,” said senior author David Sinclair, professor of genetics in the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School, co-director of the Paul F. Glenn Center for Biology of Aging Research at HMS and an expert on aging. 

Sinclair and colleagues caution that the findings remain to be replicated in further studies, including in different animal models, before any human experiments. Nonetheless, they add, the results offer a proof of concept and a pathway to designing treatments for a range of age-related human diseases.

“If affirmed through further studies, these findings could be transformative for the care of age-related vision diseases like glaucoma and to the fields of biology and medical therapeutics for disease at large,” Sinclair said.

For their work, the team used an adeno-associated virus (AAV) as a vehicle to deliver into the retinas of mice three youth-restoring genes — Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4 — that are normally switched on during embryonic development. The three genes, together with a fourth one, which was not used in this work, are collectively known as Yamanaka factors.

The treatment had multiple beneficial effects on the eye. First, it promoted nerve regeneration following optic-nerve injury in mice with damaged optic nerves. Second, it reversed vision loss in animals with a condition mimicking human glaucoma. And third, it reversed vision loss in aging animals without glaucoma.

The team’s approach is based on a new theory about why we age. Most cells in the body contain the same DNA molecules but have widely diverse functions. To achieve this degree of specialization, these cells must read only genes specific to their type. This regulatory function is the purview of the epigenome, a system of turning genes on and off in specific patterns without altering the basic underlying DNA sequence of the gene. 

This theory postulates that changes to the epigenome over time cause cells to read the wrong genes and malfunction — giving rise to diseases of aging. One of the most important changes to the epigenome is DNA methylation, a process by which methyl groups are tacked onto DNA. Patterns of DNA methylation are laid down during embryonic development to produce the various cell types. Over time, youthful patterns of DNA methylation are lost, and genes inside cells that should be switched on get turned off and vice versa, resulting in impaired cellular function. Some of these DNA methylation changes are predictable and have been used to determine the biologic age of a cell or tissue.

Yet, whether DNA methylation drives age-related changes inside cells has remained unclear. In the current study, the researchers hypothesized that if DNA methylation does, indeed, control aging, then erasing some of its footprints might reverse the age of cells inside living organisms and restore them to their earlier, more youthful state.

Past work had achieved this feat in cells grown in laboratory dishes but fell short of demonstrating the effect in living organisms.

The new findings demonstrate that the approach could be used in animals as well. 

Overcoming an important hurdle 

Lead study author, Yuancheng Lu, research fellow in genetics at HMS and a former doctoral student in Sinclair’s lab, developed a gene therapy that could safely reverse the age of cells in a living animal. 

Lu’s work builds on the Nobel Prize winning discovery of Shinya Yamanaka, who identified the four transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc, that could erase epigenetics markers on cells and return these cells to their primitive embryonic state from which they can develop into any other type of cell.  

Subsequent studies, however, showed two important setbacks. First, when used in adult mice, the four Yamanaka factors could also induce tumor growth, rendering the approach unsafe. Second, the factors could reset the cellular state to the most primitive cell state, thus completely erasing a cell’s identity.

Lu and colleagues circumvented these hurdles by slightly modifying the approach. They dropped the gene c-Myc and delivered only the remaining three Yamanaka genes, Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4.  The modified approach successfully reversed cellular aging without fueling tumor growth or losing their identity. 

Gene therapy applied to optic nerve regeneration

 In the current study, the researchers targeted cells in the central nervous system because it is the first part of the body affected by aging. After birth, the ability of the central nervous system to regenerate declines rapidly. 

To test whether the regenerative capacity of young animals could be imparted to adult mice, the researchers delivered the modified three-gene combination via an AAV into retinal ganglion cells of adult mice with optic nerve injury. 

For the work, Lu and Sinclair partnered with Zhigang He, HMS professor of neurology and of ophthalmology at Boston Children’s Hospital, who studies optic nerve and spinal cord neuro-regeneration.

The treatment resulted in a two-fold increase in the number of surviving retinal ganglion cells after the injury and a five-fold increase in nerve regrowth. 

“At the beginning of this project, many of our colleagues said our approach would fail or would be too dangerous to ever be used,” said Lu. “Our results suggest this method is safe and could potentially revolutionize the treatment of the eye and many other organs affected by aging.”

Reversal of glaucoma and age-related vision loss 

Following the encouraging findings in mice with optic nerve injuries, the team partnered with colleagues at Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear Bruce Ksander, HMS associate professor of ophthalmology, and Meredith Gregory-Ksander, HMS assistant professor of ophthalmology. They planned two sets of experiments: one to test whether the three-gene cocktail could restore vision loss due to glaucoma and another to see whether the approach could reverse vision loss stemming from normal aging.

In a mouse model of glaucoma, the treatment led to increased nerve cell electrical activity and a notable increase in visual acuity, as measured by the animals’ ability to see moving vertical lines on a screen. Remarkably, it did so after the glaucoma-induced vision loss had already occurred.

“Regaining visual function after the injury occurred has rarely been demonstrated by scientists,” Ksander said. “This new approach, which successfully reverses multiple causes of vision loss in mice without the need for a retinal transplant, represents a new treatment modality in regenerative medicine.” 

The treatment worked similarly well in elderly, 12-month-old mice with diminishing vision due to normal aging. Following treatment of the elderly mice, the gene expression patterns and electrical signals of the optic nerve cells were similar to young mice, and vision was restored. When the researchers analyzed molecular changes in treated cells, they found reversed patterns of DNA methylation — an observation suggesting that DNA methylation is not a mere marker or a bystander in the aging process, but rather an active agent driving it.

“What this tells us is the clock doesn’t just represent time — it is time,” said Sinclair. “If you wind the hands of the clock back, time also goes backward.” 

The researchers said that if their findings are confirmed in further animal work, they could initiate clinical trials within two years to test the efficacy of the approach in people with glaucoma. Thus far, the findings are encouraging, researchers said. In the current study, a one-year, whole-body treatment of mice with the three-gene approach showed no negative side effects.

Other authors on the paper include Benedikt Brommer, Xiao Tian, Anitha Krishnan, Margarita Meer, Chen Wang, Daniel Vera, Qiurui Zeng, Doudou Yu, Michael Bonkowski, Jae-Hyun Yang, Songlin Zhou, Emma Hoffmann, Margarete Karg, Michael Schultz, Alice Kane, Noah Davidsohn, Ekaterina Korobkina, Karolina Chwalek, Luis Rajman, George Church, Konrad Hochedlinger, Vadim Gladyshev, Steve Horvath, and Morgan Levine.

This work was supported in part by a Harvard Medical School Epigenetics Seed Grant and Development Grant, The Glenn Foundation for Medical Research, Edward Schulak, the National Institutes of Health (grants R01AG019719,R37AG028730, R01EY026939, R01EY021526, R01AG067782, R01GM065204, R01AG065403, R01EY025794, R24EY028767 and R21EY030276), and the St. Vincent de Paul Foundation.

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/12/reversing-glaucoma-damage-and-vision-loss/

J&J cuts the size of its COVID-19 vaccine trial

 

  • Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) has cut the size of its pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial in the U.S. against COVID-19 from 60,000 to 40,000 trial participants, STAT News reported.
  • Formerly, the largest COVID-19 vaccine study, J&J's ENSEMBLE trial, will now be similar in size to the Phase 3 trial advanced by Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) and BioNTech SE (NASDAQ:BNTX) and bigger than that conducted by Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA).
  • The change in size reflects the severity of COVID-19 infection in the U.S., which allows the developers to reach conclusions based on a smaller study.
  • The only major trial experimenting with a single-dose jab against COVID-19 has already recruited 38,000 subjects, Moncef Slaoui, the head of Operation Warp Speed, said last week.
  • A statement from J&J read, “we continue to anticipate that interim data from the ENSEMBLE trial will be available by the end of January. If the vaccine is safe and effective, an emergency use authorization application could be submitted to the FDA in February.”
  • https://seekingalpha.com/news/3643900-j-and-j-cuts-size-of-covidminus-19-vaccine-trial

SPAC Senior Connect Acquisition I, led by UNH founder, prices upsized $360M IPO at $10

 Senior Connect Acquisition I, a blank check company formed by the founder of UnitedHealth targeting the senior market, raised $360 million by offering 36 million units at $10. The company offered 6 million more units than anticipated. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one-half of a warrant, exercisable at $11.50.


The company is led by CEO and Chairman Richard Burke, the founder and former CEO of UnitedHealth Group. Burke currently serves as a Managing Partner at Rainy Partners and previously was the owner, CEO, and Governor of the NHL team Phoenix Coyotes. President and Director Isaac Applbaum is co-founder and Partner at Israel-focused investment fund MizMaa and co-founder of senior-oriented business Secure and blockchain technologies company SecureKey. CFO and Director Ryan Burke is currently the CIO of Rainy Partners and BFO LLC. Senior Connect Acquisition I plans to target select sectors of the senior market, including lifestyle, home-based services, and health platforms, among others.

Senior Connect Acquisition I plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol SNRHU. Citi acted as a lead manager on the deal.

SPAC Healthcare Services Acquisition lowers deal size by 20% ahead of $240M IPO

 Healthcare Services Acquisition, a blank check company targeting healthcare services and related industries in the US, lowered the proposed deal size for its upcoming IPO on Friday. 


The Bethesda, MD-based company now plans to raise $240 million by offering 24 million units at $10. The company had previously filed to offer 30 million units at the same price. Each unit will still consist of one share of common stock and one-half of a warrant, exercisable at $11.50. Anchor investor BlackRock intends to purchase $20 million worth of units in the offering. At the revised deal size, Healthcare Services Acquisition will raise -20% less in proceeds than previously anticipated.

The company is led by CEO and Chairman David Blair, the Executive Chairman of Accountable Health Solutions and former CEO of Catalyst Health Solutions, and President and Director Martin Payne, who has held executive leadership positions at MedX, Comprehensive Clinical Solutions, and HRGi. The company plans to target the healthcare services and related industries in the US.

Healthcare Services Acquisition was founded in 2020 and plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol HCARU. B. Riley FBR is the sole bookrunner on the deal.

Certara Announced Pricing of Its Upsized IPO

 Certara , Inc. (“Certara”), a global leader in biosimulation, today announced the pricing of its upsized initial public offering of 29,055,000 shares of its common stock at $23.00 per share. Certara is offering 14,630,000 shares of its common stock and certain selling stockholders are offering 14,425,000 shares of common stock in the offering. Shares of Certara’s common stock are expected to begin trading on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 11, 2020, under the ticker symbol “CERT,” and the offering is expected to close on December 15, 2020, subject to customary closing conditions. The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 4,358,250 shares of common stock at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The gross proceeds to Certara from the offering will be approximately $336.5 million, before deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. Certara will not receive any proceeds from any sale of shares in the offering by the selling stockholders.

The offering is being made through an underwriting group led by Jefferies, Morgan Stanley and BofA Securities, who are acting as lead joint book-running managers, and Credit Suisse, Barclays and William Blair, who are acting as joint book-running managers.

Certara, a global leader in biosimulation based on 2019 revenue, accelerates medicines to patients using proprietary biosimulation software and technology to transform traditional drug discovery and development. Its clients include 1,600 global biopharmaceutical companies, leading academic institutions, and key regulatory agencies across 60 countries.

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/certara-announced-pricing-of-its-upsized-initial-public-offering/

How University of Queensland/CSL vaccine failed due to 'false positive' HIV tests

 Australia's hopes of producing a locally developed COVID-19 vaccine have been dashed with news today the University of Queensland/CSL vaccine would not proceed to further clinical trials.

However, unlike news about the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID  earlier this week, there were no safety concerns with the UQ/CSL vaccine.

According to a statement to the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) earlier today, CSL said participants in the phase 1 trial received "false positive" results to HIV tests. They were not infected with HIV, nor did the vaccine contain the entire HIV virus.

Rather, the vaccine's signature "molecular clamp" technology was formulated with parts of an HIV protein. When injected, these prompted the production of antibodies that were picked up in a range of HIV tests. In other words, if the vaccine had been widely rolled out, this could lead many people to think they had HIV when they didn't.

The news prompted the  to announce it had cancelled its agreement to supply the UQ/CSL vaccine, which was always contingent on successfully completing .

Instead, the government will supply more doses of other vaccines, including 20 million extra doses of the University of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, to be made by CSL.

The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is the first COVID vaccine with published peer-reviewed results from phase 3 clinical , a significant milestone.

As well as the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, existing arrangements are in place to supply Australians with the Pfizer/BioNTech and Novavax vaccines, should they prove safe and effective. That's as well as vaccines available under the World Health Organisation-backed COVAX agreement.

How could a COVID vaccine lead to a positive HIV test?

The UQ/CSL vaccine uses "molecular clamp" technology to present the  spike protein in the best orientation to elicit an immune response. In other words, the molecular clamp stops the spike protein from "wobbling about." This more stable presentation is more likely to lead to a protective immune response.

The molecular clamp in UQ's vaccine contains part of an HIV protein, a string of 80 amino acids. By itself, this is harmless and cannot cause an HIV infection or AIDS.

But there was always a theoretical possibility that once injected as part of the vaccine formulation, people's immune systems would recognize it as "foreign" and raise antibodies against it. Until now, the research team thought the chance of that happening was low. And in its ASX statement CSL said people in the 216-person trial were fully informed of this possibility.

However, from what we've heard today, it's clear that people's immune systems did recognize the HIV protein fragment in the molecular clamp.

Had we rolled out this vaccine on a wider scale, we would have seen many more "false positive" HIV tests. This would have meant unnecessary anxiety while people sought further clarification about their HIV status.

It would also have undermined the public's confidence in the COVID vaccination program. You have to have the public on board. So by acting early to clearly communicate concerns, the researchers have acted appropriately. And this should reinforce the public's confidence in Australia's COVID vaccination program, due to start from March 2021.

Is this the end of UQ's 'molecular clamp' technology?

This particular molecular clamp is unique to UQ. So while this particular type will not be used for future vaccines, it's likely the researchers will investigate and modify it to reduce the chance of any further HIV cross-reactivity.

I certainly don't think it's the end of this technology.

So where does this leave us?

We've known all along that not all COVID-19 vaccines in early clinical trials would be successful. Safety issues or a lack of protection will halt some. But in this case, we had something different—a complication that would lead people to believe they had HIV when they didn't, undermining people's confidence in the COVID vaccine program.

That's why it's still important to pursue a broad portfolio of vaccine approaches and technologies. We don't want to put all our eggs in one basket.

It's also important to remember that even though the UQ/CSL vaccine will not proceed to late-stage clinical trials, phase 1 trials will continue, with results submitted for peer review in due course. That means researchers can analyze the results in more detail.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-12-university-queenslandcsl-vaccine-due-false.html