Search This Blog

Sunday, October 8, 2023

Hochul paying NYers $25 for tobacco survey, but no questions on pot ban

 New York tax dollars are going up in smoke.

The Hochul administration is shelling out at least $150,000 in taxpayer money to survey New Yorkers about banning the sale of tobacco products — but bizarrely isn’t asking them about banning pot, The Post has learned.

The state Health Department last month began sending out crisp five-dollar bills to targeted residents in a bid to entice roughly 6,000 of them to earn another $20 by filling out a survey about smoking and vaping habits — and the potential for an all-out tobacco prohibition.

“The past few years have shown New Yorkers how important it is to support public health,” says the mailer from Ola Fajobi, a department scientist specializing in tobacco surveillance.

“Open this postcard to learn how you can participate in our important survey and get $20.”

The poll’s 90-plus questions seek input on a variety of health issues and smoking and vaping preferences, including whether survey takers believe smoking tobacco and marijuana could be harmful.

Pro-legal-weed Gov. Kathy Hochul and the state Health Department are spending at least $150,000 paying New Yorkers to take a survey about banning tobacco sales statewide.
Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/Shutterstock
Roughly 6,000 New Yorkers will be paid $25 to a take survey aimed at gauging interest in an all-out prohibition of tobacco sales.
Jonathan Brady/PA Images/Alamy Images/Sipa USA

“What is your opinion about a policy that ends the sale of all tobacco products in New York within 10 years?” reads one question.

“What is your opinion about policies that ban the sale of flavored tobacco products like flavored cigars, little cigars, smokeless, tobacco, and hookah?” reads another.

But there isn’t a single query gauging support for an outright ban on weed — even as increasing evidence shows serious health hazards from smoking pot, which the state legalized the sale of in 2021.

“This seems to be a flagrant waste of taxpayer money,” said one Albany insider.

“I never seen people bribed with taxpayer money to take a survey or an agency test market policy initiatives” through such a survey involving the general public. “That is highly unusual.”

State DOH officials declined to say how much the survey will cost, but the $150,000 is the bare minimum, based on the 6,000 participants pocketing cash or a combination of cash and Amazon gift cards.

And that doesn’t include people who threw out the envelopes containing five-dollar bills before opening them, thinking they were junk mail, or pocketed the money without taking the survey.

It also doesn’t include the mailing costs or payments to the nonprofit research organization RTI International for producing the survey.

In April, RTI oversaw a similar anti-tobacco study that solicited input from county legislators and county directors of public health – who were not paid.

Recent studies have shown that heavy use of marijuana can boost the likelihood of getting schizophrenia, heart disease, and other medical conditions.
AP

Kent Sopris, president of the New York Association of Convenience Store Owners, said state officials would be better off spending tax dollars on crackdowns on cigarettes illegally sold on the black market and underage use of cannabis and tobacco products.

“I think paying people to take surveys instead of putting some money on enforcement is pretty bizzare, and to focus solely on banning tobacco and not marijuana or cannabis kind of the shows the state’s a little backwards here,” he said.

New research from the University of Calgary published last week in Addiction, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, found that adults who misuse cannabis have a 60% higher risk of experiencing their first heart attack, stroke, or other major cardiovascular event.

Cigarettes and other tobacco products have long been linked to lung cancer and other medical ailments.
Getty Images/iStockphoto

massive Danish study based on nearly 7 million health records drew a strong correlation between heavy cannabis use and increased risk of schizophrenia in young men. 

Health Department spokesman Cort Ruddy defended the surveys as a means to “prevent more suffering from tobacco,” which has long been linked to lung cancer and other ailments.

“The data from this annual survey will help the department understand current use patterns and plan evidence-based services to prevent initiation by those currently not smoking, encourage cessation for those who currently smoke, and protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke exposure,” he said. “As with all surveys, the questions we ask do not indicate whether the department supports or opposes the policies they highlight.” 

https://nypost.com/2023/10/07/hochul-paying-nyers-25-to-test-market-tobacco-sale-ban/

Washington and Wall Street need to speak same language on China threats

 February 2028: China’s warships are conducting massive exercises off the coast of Taiwan.

Temporary housing is popping up around China’s southeastern ports.

People’s Liberation Army troops are massing near the port cities and civilian ships are being confiscated and repurposed for military use.

Our best intelligence suggests that General Secretary Xi Jinping has given the order to invade.

Already in a bear market, the S&P 500 plummets 15%. The price of gold spikes.

Liquidity evaporates across financial markets. Shipping insurance skyrockets.

Global maritime trade is thrown back to 19th-century levels.

Rumors abound that some London and Asian banks that are on the verge of failing. Americans see their pensions shrink and their bank accounts hemorrhage cash.

A desperate US president asks his Cabinet: Are there any economic and financial tools we can use to deter the looming invasion?

That’s the fictional scenario that the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party considered during a tabletop exercise in New York last month.

Playing the role of Cabinet advisors were current and former execs from major Wall Street banks, pharmaceutical companies and critical minerals mining companies.

In 2028, we found, we had few good non-military options to prevent an CCP invasion of Taiwan.

Worse, our economic vulnerabilities, such as critical supply-chain dependencies, undermined our military deterrent posture.

The US needs to diversify critical supply chains out of Ji Xinping’s China through a mix of incentives, regulatory reform and trade policy
Getty Images

Seeing that America was dependent on China for active pharmaceutical ingredients and rare earth minerals, and on Taiwan for semiconductors, CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping concluded that he held the global economy hostage, was capable of enduring more economic pain than America, and so could thus undertake launch a risky military operation with a reasonable chance of success.

But the war game had a second act: We traveled “back” to 2023 to see what hard choices we can make now to increase our leverage in the future.

The time to start exercising isn’t while you’re having a heart attack, it’s long before.

Today, the US needs to diversify critical supply chains out of China through a mix of incentives, regulatory reform and trade policy.

Strengthening our economic sovereignty now and trading more with our allies will make economic deterrents like SWIFT system access more powerful and prevent the Chinese Communist Party from holding Americans economically hostage. 

Congress’ Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party recently held a wargame with executives from Wall Street and pharma looking at how to prevent the CCP from holding Americans economically hostage.
VCG via Getty Images

We also need to stop funding the CCP’s military modernization and intelligence-surveillance complex.

That demands restricting outbound capital flows on both public and private investment in China, including through passive indices.

But the biggest takeaway of all was that to deter conflict, there is no substitute for American hard power.

The war game was just one part of our committee’s broader trip to New York to speak with Wall Street leaders about the systemic risk posed to our economy from China.

We wanted to find out if Wall Street was moving to protect American investors from a China-sparked crisis or simply betting on another bailout. 

We found an industry just waking up to a hangover. 

One bank CEO called the last 25 years of our financial relationship with China “a huge mistake.” Some see the systemic risks of investing in China clearly. 

In his testimony to our field hearing, former Bridgewater CEO Dave McCormick argued that “the Chinese economic model poses grave financial and geopolitical threats to the US and its interests.” 

Unfortunately, many more on Wall Street continue to act like the CCP is a friend, or at least a trusted business partner.

They also continue to bury their heads in the sand on Taiwan, ignoring the view shared by nearly all intelligence and military leadership that, as Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall said last month, “the intelligence couldn’t be clearer. China is preparing for war … with the United States.”

Wall Street continues to bury its head in the sand about a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Meanwhile, Taiwan is preparing anti-landing drills.
AP

Cut to the head of a major asset management firm insisting that the chance of China invading Taiwan in the next five years was “zero.”

It’s like Washington and Wall Street are two different countries speaking completely different languages.

We’ve started to see parallels with the last financial crisis: Wall Street pushes trillions of toxic securities onto unwitting Americans, using financial engineering to hide risks and skirt regulations.

Instead of subprime mortgages in 2008, this time it’s Chinese securities that often use obscure “Variable Interest Entity” structures to strip corporate governance and shareholder protections from investors. 

The risks go well beyond a Taiwan Strait conflict.

The CCP is criminalizing routine business practices like due diligence, data gathering and independent corporate governance often necessary for fulfilling obligations to investors and shareholders.

One Wall Street exec called the last 25 years of America’s financial relationship with China “a huge mistake.” 
REUTERS

Given the myriad risks, you’d think that if American pension money were going into Chinese firms, we’d have higher accounting and regulatory standards for those firms, especially when they list on our stock exchanges.

But the opposite is true.

A recent deal struck between the US government’s account watchdog, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and the Chinese government circumvents the spirit of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act.

The deal forces US regulators to accept Chinese audits of US-listed Chinese firms despite those audits being found inadequate. 

As former head of the Securities and Exchange Commission Jay Clayton testified to our committee: Decades after China’s welcome into the global economy, “The belief that regulatory and policy norms in China would gravitate toward transparency, accountability and stability remains substantially aspirational.” 

Former SEC head Jay Clayton predicted to the committee: “The belief that regulatory and policy norms in China would gravitate toward transparency, accountability and stability remains substantially aspirational.” 
Getty Images

And so American pensions, endowments and retirement savings are at risk.

Fraud, fake accounting and outright lies are endemic to the communist system. In hedge-funder Jim Chanos’ words, “There is a long and storied history of data coming out of China being falsified at every level of government reporting.”

We went to Wall Street to share Congress’ bipartisan concerns regarding the CCP’s increasing aggression. 

We also wanted to invite criticism, as we recognize these are complex issues.

Preserving the integrity of US capital markets and the dominance of the US dollar will take thoughtful legislation and sustained oversight. 

Our trip happened to begin on 9/11, and before conducting our war game we visited Ground Zero. 

The 9/11 Commission concluded that the most important failure leading to 9/11 “was one of imagination,” as the terrorist threat “ was not a major topic for policy debate among the public, the media, or in the Congress.” 

Though a CCP invasion of Taiwan may still seem unfathomable to the financial community, the American people see the growing risks of CCP economic coercion and military aggression. 

It is time for leaders in Washington and Wall Street to use our imaginations in order to prevent a crisis and protect our economic sovereignty.

Rep. Mike Gallagher is Chairman of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and represents Wisconsin’s 8th District. 

https://nypost.com/2023/10/07/washington-dc-wall-street-must-communicate-on-china-threats/