Search This Blog

Sunday, January 7, 2024

Retiring on Social Security with little other income/assets

 Many Americans reach retirement with almost no savings. No 401(k). Few investments. And almost no income aside from a monthly Social Security check.

Roughly one in seven Social Security recipients ages 65 and older depend on their benefits for nearly all their income, according to an AARP analysis. Unable to maintain the lifestyle of their working years, they trim their already trim budgets, move into smaller homes, or rely on the kindness of relatives to get by.

Social Security was never intended to fully support retirees, said Anqi Chen, assistant director of savings research at Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research.

In 1940, when the program was new, Social Security replaced just over 20% of a typical worker’s income at age 65. As Congress enhanced benefits, the figure rose to about 50% in the early 1980s. It stands at under 40% today, according to Chen.

The average monthly Social Security check is about $1,900. That doesn’t go as far as it once did, said Sandy Markwood, CEO of USAging, adding that inflation and rising rents have led more older adults to seek help from her nonprofit’s Eldercare Locator tool and other organizations that provide support to seniors.

We spoke in depth with four retirees who rely mostly on Social Security benefits about their fears, joys and financial challenges. Though they don’t live as comfortably as those fortunate enough to have amassed $2 million or $5 million nest eggs, they say they have found ways to build fulfilling lives in retirement.


70 YEARS OLD

Eric Miller

Fredericksburg, Va.

MONTHLY SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK

$1,400

PHOTO: ABIGAIL GREY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Eric Miller never wanted to leave the kitchen. The professional chef thrived on the intensity of restaurant life, often working 12-hour days six to seven days a week.

A heart condition landed him in the hospital about seven years ago. After that, he had no choice but to hang up his knives.

Now 70, Miller said he was unprepared for sudden retirement, financially or otherwise, in part because he never planned to stop working, he said.

At the height of his career he earned about $2,000 a week; now, his monthly Social Security check brings in about $1,400. 

He rents the basement of his sister’s home for about $500 a month including electricity. His other main expenses include food, gas and insurance. His six heart medications are largely covered by social services. 

About 17 years ago, he moved to Arizona to care for his aging mother as her dementia and Alzheimer’s worsened. When she had a stroke, he took a nearly two-year career break to help care for her full-time until she died. He eventually moved back to Virginia, where he worked for a few more years. 

Though money is tighter than he would like, Miller is proudly debt free. He paid off more than $12,000 in credit-card debt this summer with the help of nonprofit financial counseling agency GreenPath Financial Wellness. He also got relief from his roughly $100,000 in medical bills for his four heart procedures, thanks to the hospital’s charity. 

“I feel a lot less stressed,” he said. 

Miller, a retired professional chef, enjoys cooking for family and friends and watching his favorite football team, the Kansas City Chiefs, on television.ABIGAIL GREY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

In retirement, he embraced budgeting for the first time, regularly tracking his spending in a spreadsheet. 

“I work on my budget religiously,” he said. 

Some months, he has about $150 left over, which usually buys him more food that he particularly likes such as chicken and vegetables.

The former high-school athlete enjoys watching football and basketball on television. His dog died last year, but he is considering getting a new one. 

“I’ll probably go to a pound,” he said.


73 YEARS OLD

Kathy Rote

Tucson, Ariz.

MONTHLY SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK

$1,040

PHOTO: CASSIDY ARAIZA FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Kathy Rote has been an advocate for people with disabilities her entire adult life. The retired social worker still helps friends with age-related mobility problems find the services they need to remain independent.

“Seniors are generally embarrassed by disability,” said Rote, 73. “It takes confidence to say, ‘I have this disability and it’s within my rights to seek accommodations.’”

Afflicted with polio as an infant, Rote knows the challenges and expenses of life with a disability. Today she lives on her $1,040 Social Security check. 

As a child, she used leg braces and Canadian canes to get around, and recounts being bullied in school. 

The obstacles she encountered inspired her to work for years for a nonprofit in Berkeley, Calif. Founded and run by people with disabilities, the organization focused on helping disabled people, including seniors, live and work independently. 

Shortly after the Americans With Disabilities Act was signed into law in 1990, Rote started having chronic muscle pain and fatigue and was diagnosed with post-polio syndrome.

She adjusted by using a motorized wheelchair. But by 1993, she lacked the stamina to work full-time and claimed Social Security Disability Insurance. Around age 66, those benefits stopped and she began getting retirement benefits. She moved to Tucson, Ariz., where she had attended college. 

A folk singer and guitarist, she rejoined a group that had started the Tucson Folk Festival years before. 

An advocate for people with disabilities, Rote worked for years for a nonprofit on issues including accessible housing.CASSIDY ARAIZA FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

She bought a home with the $60,000 her uncle left her, and has no debt. (She shares the home with Archie, her 90-pound rescue dog.)

Due to her age and income, Rote receives discounts on her property taxes, utilities and wireless bills. She saves about $150 a month for the taxes and pays about $135 for gas, electric and phone service.

She supplements the $200 she spends on food each month with a $157 benefit her Medicare Advantage plan provides, which she uses to pay for over-the-counter medication and groceries.

Hiring attendants to help with housecleaning, wheelchair maintenance and food prep costs Rote $300 a month. She said the Pima Council on Aging reimburses her under a program intended to keep older adults in their homes. She enjoys getting to know her neighbors. She recently used her wheelchair-accessible van to help one move.

Rote said the recent deaths of her mother and five friends have convinced her “to make the effort to see people,” so she hosts occasional parties on her patio.

“We sing songs and eat some food and talk about what really matters to each of us,” she said.


77 YEARS OLD

Joyce McKiney

Philadelphia

MONTHLY SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK

$1,800

PHOTO: HANNAH YOON FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Joyce McKiney, 77, wishes she’d spent more time learning about money when she was younger.

She didn’t know then how much boosting her earnings during her working years could have raised her Social Security benefits. She regrets not pushing herself to pursue higher education. She also wishes she had learned to pay her family’s bills so she didn’t have to get a crash course after her husband died in 2015.

McKiney worked in retail for years and then as a healthcare customer-service representative. She retired around 2001—sooner than she had hoped due to a medical issue. In a good year, she earned about $25,000. Her husband’s trucking job balanced their budget, she said. 

After he died, Joyce sold their home and moved into low-income senior housing. She gave up her car and landline. She learned how to budget and live within her new means.

None of this was the plan. 

“You never know what the future is going to bring,” she said. 

The couple had just refinanced the house and used the money to make necessary repairs and update its security system. She netted a roughly $4,000 profit from the sale—far less than the tens of thousands she had expected.

“It was an extremely difficult time,” she said. She felt lonely and anxious about money. She was close with her children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren but life just wasn’t the same. 

McKiney enjoys the meals and activities the senior center offers including parties, games and field trips.HANNAH YOON FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Now, she feels a bit more secure, though far from flush, she said. She has found ways to stretch her $1,800 Social Security check. 

Since downsizing, she pays about $343 a month for a storage unit. Her rent rose recently, to $584 a month. She spends about $68 a month for basic cable and $77 for her cellphone. An insurance policy costs about $269 a month. About $150 to $200 each month goes to food and about $100 for laundry.

She takes subsidized senior transportation for a dollar a ride to get to most places.

McKiney is active in the social scene at the senior center where she spends most of her weekdays, arriving at the Allegheny branch of the Philadelphia Senior Center at around 9 a.m. and catching up with friends over free coffee and a $1 corn muffin. 

A game of pinochle might follow. Later for about a $1 donation she might have a hot lunch of ribs, green beans, mac and cheese and fruit cocktail.

“They make better food than I’d make for just myself,” she said.

Knee problems keep her out of the center’s line-dancing classes, but she enjoys listening to whatever music is playing or taking the occasional field trip with friends.

“Many of the people here are now like an extended family to me,” she said.


63 YEARS OLD

Barbara Talisman

Nomad

MONTHLY SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK

$1,970

PHOTO: LIN-CHEN KUEI

During her 18-year marriage she and her former husband spent much of their disposable income on travel, rather than saving for retirement. The couple attended the World’s Fair in Nagoya, Japan, in 2005 and saw the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race in Alaska in 2006. To escape Chicago winters, they traveled to Australia and Mexico and spent long weekends in Paris.

Toward the end of her career she began putting money into savings. Today, she has $151,000 in a retirement account and another $22,000 in a brokerage account. Although she mainly relies on her $1,970 Social Security check, she supplements it with investment account withdrawals of about $800 a month.

She said it is enough to fund her globe-trotting. She booked four weeklong back-to-back cruises to Mexico in the fall of 2021, when prices were low due to lingering Covid concerns. She settled briefly in Puerto Vallarta, but returned to Chicago when the weather got hot in Mexico. That winter, she followed the sun and did a stint in Melbourne, Australia, where she had worked from 2016 to 2018.

Talisman, who lives a nomadic lifestyle, recently splurged on a trip to South America.EVELYN DE LA TORRE; REED SCHENK; BARBARA TALISMAN

In Australia, she saved money by house sitting, one of her favorite hacks to cut costs.

Her food averages $300 a month and car insurance costs $134. Recently, she spent seven months in California, spending about $500 a month on hotels between housesitting gigs.

Talisman’s biggest expense is a $706 monthly loan payment for the Tesla she purchased in 2019, which will be paid off in a year. When overseas, she rents the car on Turo, income that generally covers her loan payment and insurance. 

She is also launching a travel agency for solo women travelers and plans to keep wandering.

During Talisman’s five-month trip to Australia last winter, she spent about $10,000, including airfare.

This year, she is splurging. Since Dec. 1, she has been on a 50-day cruise in South America, with visits to Antarctica, the Galápagos and Machu Picchu. She will pull about half the balance in her $22,000 brokerage account.

“This is going to blow the Social Security budget, but I only live once,” she said.

https://discussion.fool.com/t/retiring-on-social-security-with-little-other-income-assets/100336

Trump, in Iowa, demands release of those jailed for 2021 Capitol attack

 Donald Trump on Saturday downplayed his role in the siege of the U.S. Capitol on the third anniversary of the attack, arguing that those prosecuted for storming the building should be freed.

Speaking at a campaign event in Clinton, Iowa with the first Republican nominating contest little more than a week away, Trump called those jailed in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack "hostages" and said they had been mistreated by the Biden administration.

"They've suffered enough," Trump said. "I call them hostages. Some people call them prisoners."

Speaking to more than a thousand supporters in a school gymnasium, Trump repeated his unfounded claims that the 2020 election was fraudulent and cast himself as a victim of political persecution.

"I got indicted because I challenged the crooked election," Trump told the crowd.

Trump faces a bevy of state and federal charges for his attempts to subvert the election, but has not been charged with instigating the 2021 insurrection, when a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol as legislators were certifying President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory.

Biden has repeatedly called Trump a threat to democracy on the campaign trail, and that messaging has emerged as an central theme of his campaign so far. Vice President Kamala Harris spoke of the Jan. 6 assault at length during an event in South Carolina on Saturday.

At recent campaign events in Iowa, Trump's supporters - and even supporters of other Republican presidential hopefuls - have downplayed the significance of Jan. 6, and many have embraced conspiracy theories regarding the events of that day.

Trump himself has suggested during previous campaign stops that undercover FBI agents played a significant role instigating the attack, an account not supported by official investigations.

More than 1,200 people have been charged with taking part in the riot, and more than 900 have either pleaded guilty or been convicted following a trial.

"It wasn't really an insurrection," said Hale Wilson, a Trump supporter from Des Moines who attended a campaign event in Newton, Iowa earlier in the day. "There were bad actors involved that got the crowd going."

At the Clinton event, Erin George, a local county commissioner, said the prison sentences handed down to the rioters "were 100 percent unwarranted."

Trump was in Iowa to curry support ahead of the state's Republican caucus on Jan. 15, which is the first contest of the Republican presidential nominating contest. He currently leads all competitors by more than 30 percentage points in the state, according to most polls.

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-iowa-skirts-jan-6-214826761.html

Mexican authorities investigate massacre after rival criminal groups clash in remote desert

 Mexican authorities in the violence-plagued southwestern state of Guerrero said they were investigating a gruesome massacre that took place in a part of a remote desert where two rival criminal groups have been fighting for control.

Police investigators had found five burned bodies stacked onto a burned vehicle when they arrived in Buenavista de los Hurtado on Friday, the state attorney general said in a statement shared late on Saturday.

Citing footage shared by alleged members of the Familia Michoacana on social media and interviews with unnamed sources in the area, local media reported that 30 people had died after a drone attack.

In the footage shot in the desert, heavily armed men dressed in military clothing were shown piling bodies - some naked, their clothes scattered around the ground - on the hood and the rear of a red pickup riddled with bullet holes.

Some of the men appeared to have limbs cut off and at least one had a head missing.

A severed head is shown being arranged atop the human pile by one man while another, holding the camera and filming the pickup from all sides, says in heavy Mexican swear words to "send more."

Since being posted on Friday night, the video racked up 3.1 million views on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

Reuters was unable to independently verify the video, but several local media later published widely-shared videos showing what appeared to be the same pickup and burned bodies.

Mexican authorities in the statement said they were aware of a "confrontation between the criminal groups of Familia Michoacana and Los Tlacos, which have a running dispute for control of the area."

Police investigators in the area found no evidence of other crimes, the statement said, adding that villagers had declined to give DNA samples that would allow for the identification of the remains and advance investigations.

Reuters was unable to get comment from villagers.

https://news.yahoo.com/mexican-authorities-investigate-massacre-rival-163725720.html

Citing Anonymous Sources, WSJ Smears Musk As Drug Abuser

 The Wall Street Journal fired some serious shots at Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Saturday night, dropping a lengthy hit piece accusing him of illegal drug use to an extent that has worried executives and board members while potentially jeopardizing Musk's various federal government contracts.

The article relies heavily on anonymous sources, described, for example," as "people who have witnessed his drug use and others with knowledge of it." Here are two of the more potent paragraphs:  

The world’s wealthiest person has used LSD, cocaine, ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms, often at private parties around the world, where attendees sign nondisclosure agreements or give up their phones to enter, according to people who have witnessed his drug use and others with knowledge of it.

In 2018... he took multiple tabs of acid at a party he hosted in Los Angeles. The next year he partied on magic mushrooms at an event in Mexico. In 2021, he took ketamine recreationally with his brother, Kimbal Musk, in Miami at a house party during Art Basel. He has taken illegal drugs with current SpaceX and former Tesla board member Steve Jurvetson.

Many of the article's accounts go back a few years or more, and there are no specific descriptions of where or when Musk supposedly used cocaine or ecstasy. As for ketamine, the 52-year-old has previously said he's been prescribed the drug for depression, and last year tweeted that it was a better avenue than antidepressants that are "zombifying" patients. In 2018, he famously shared some cannabis on Joe Rogan's show.

Musk's lawyer told the Journal that Musk is "regularly and randomly drug tested at SpaceX and has never failed a test," and said there were "other false facts" in the quasi-exposé, but didn't specify what they are. The lawyer didn't respond to the Journal's query about which drugs are screened for in the tests. 

The Journal says former Tesla director Linda Johnson Rice was so fed up with Musk's unpredictable behavior and worries about drug use that she opted out of pursuing re-election in 2019. Here again, it's not Rice telling the Journal that, but "people familiar with the matter."  

Among the purportedly concerning anecdotes outlined in the story is a 2017 SpaceX all-hands meeting to discuss the firm's Big Falcon Rocket (BFR) prototype. According to the Journal, Musk showed up an hour late, only to slur his words in a rambling speech in which he repeatedly called the product the "Big Fucking Rocket." SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell was said to have intervened and taken charge of the session, with executives later quietly speculating that Musk was on drugs. An unidentified witness described his performance as "nonsensical," "unhinged," and "cringeworthy." 

In another speculation-centric element of the Journal story, Tesla board members were said to have worried that Musk was on drugs in 2018 when he took to Twitter and said he planned to take the firm private and had "funding secured." That market-moving tweet put Musk in hot water with the SEC, which alleged he'd misled investors. Some of the worried board members considered pushing Musk to take a leave of absence, according to "people familiar with the discussions."

The Journal's Emily Glazer and Kirsten Grind seemed bent on putting Musk's business in danger. They note that, in addition to potentially violating his own companies' policies, drug use of the types alleged in the story could imperil Musk's dealings with the federal government, including $14 billion in SpaceX business. Regardless of more permissive state laws, federal contracts require compliance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act.

In addition to drug testing, the law requires that firms publish a statement "notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the person's workplace." Contractors must also inform employees that compliance with that statement is a condition of employment. Drug use can also lead to the cancellation of security clearances. 

Musk hit back at WSJ: 

"After that one puff with Rogan, I agreed, at NASA’s request, to do 3 years of random drug testing. Not even trace quantities were found of any drugs or alcohol. @WSJ is not fit to line a parrot cage for bird 💩 7." 

Let's not forget that Musk's social media platform X is an attempt to fracture corporate media. So, of course, it's only in the best interest of legacy media to churn out hit piece after hit piece on the billionaire. 

However... 

It's worth highlighting that the 1988 law's scope is focused on the "workplace." With Musk a notorious, globe-trotting workaholic, defining his workplaces could be a challenging lawyerly endeavor. 

Multiple federal agencies have already been weaponized against Musk, and now one of the establishment's leading newspapers has piled on with its own shot. At year-end, we reported that Musk had regained the title of "world's richest person," suggesting it could render him "too big to cancel" -- but they're clearly not going to stop trying.  

Legacy media's smear campaign didn't stop with Musk. 

Last Thursday, Business Insider targeted hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman's wife, Neri Oxman. The report noted she plagiarized multiple paragraphs of her 2010 doctoral dissertation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This comes directly after Ackman's war on 'woke' Harvard University resulted in the ousting of Claudine Gay, former president of the school, over plagiarism.

These smear campaigns are becoming very noticeable to the untrained eye - or the average American - suggesting a diminishing impact on discrediting individuals' credibility and reputation by legacy media. Therefore, it seems likely that the era of canceling folks by corporate media and elites is in decline. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/saturday-night-drive-citing-anonymous-sources-wsj-paints-musk-drug-abuser

Spirit Aero made blowout part but Boeing has key role

 Aerospace supplier Spirit AeroSystems manufactured and initially installed the fuselage part on a brand-new Boeing 737 Max 9 jet that suffered a blowout on Friday, but Boeing also has a key role in the usual completion process, sources told Reuters.

Because of a complex, two-tier installation process, investigators are expected to examine whether any flaws occurred at Spirit's giant fuselage plant in Wichita, Kansas, or at the Boeing factory outside Seattle, the sources said.

Regulators on Saturday grounded most Boeing 737 MAX 9s for safety checks after the eight-week-old Alaska Airlines plane, carrying 171 passengers and six crew, lost a door-replacement panel during a U.S. flight, before landing safely with a gaping hole in its side on Friday night.

The 737 MAX 9, currently Boeing's largest single-aisle, seating up to 220 people, includes an optional extra door to allow for the approved number of evacuation paths whenever carriers opt to install the maximum number of seats.

But most airlines using the jet have chosen a looser layout based on a smaller number of seats and do not need the surplus door, which adds weight and reduces flexibility in the cabin. Instead the door is deactivated before delivery, using a "plug."

Other optional doors or fill-in replacement structures were also offered on a predecessor model, the 737-900ER.

As part of the production process, Spirit builds fuselages for 737s and sends them by train with the special door assembly “semi-rigged,” one of the people said.

“They are fitted but not completed," the person said.

At its Renton, Washington, plant, Boeing typically removes the pop-out, or non-functioning, door and uses the gap to load interiors. Then, the part is put back and the installation in completed. Finally, the hull is pressurized to 150% to make sure everything is working correctly, the person said.

After Shooting Ashli Babbitt, Capitol Police Lt. Made False Radio Report: Lawsuit

 by Joseph M. Hanneman via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Within a minute after firing the fatal bullet that struck Ashli Babbitt on Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd broadcast a radio report claiming shots were being fired at him in the Speaker’s Lobby and he was “prepared to fire back,” a federal lawsuit alleges.

The previously undisclosed radio dispatch is also contained on an audio recording obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times of the “OPS2” dispatch channel used by Capitol Police on Jan. 6.

Information on the recording is contained in a federal lawsuit filed on Jan. 5 by Ms. Babbitt’s widower, Aaron Babbitt of San Diego. Mr. Babbitt, backed in his lawsuit by Judicial Watch, is seeking $30 million from the U. S. government for wrongful death.

According to the lawsuit, Mr. Byrd fired his Glock 22 .40-caliber pistol, striking Ms. Babbitt in the left shoulder, then announced that he was being fired upon and was ready to return fire.

In fact, no shots were fired at Lt. Byrd or his fellow officers,” the lawsuit stated. “The only shot fired was the single shot Lt. Byrd fired at Ashli. He heard the loud noise of the gunshot. He saw her fall backward from the window frame.”

The Epoch Times reached out to Capitol Police and Mr. Byrd’s attorney for comment on the lawsuit and its allegations. Mr. Byrd is now a captain with U.S. Capitol Police.

A few minutes prior to the shooting, a police dispatcher mistakenly reported, “They’re taking shots into the House floor.”

“Lt. Byrd erroneously believed and acted on a false radio call and/or false report of shots fired on the House floor occurring before he left the House floor and moved across the Speaker’s Lobby to the adjacent Retiring Room,” the suit said.

“A reasonably prudent officer in Lt. Byrd’s position would have been aware that, in fact, the report was false and the sound heard on the House floor was glass breaking, not shots fired,” the lawsuit alleged.

It is not clear why Mr. Byrd made the statement that he was taking fire and was prepared to fire back. His radio dispatch occurred up to a minute after he fired on Ms. Babbitt, the suit said.

The facts speak truth. Ashli was ambushed when she was shot by Lt. Byrd,” the lawsuit said. “Multiple witnesses at the scene yelled, ‘You just murdered her.’”

“Lt. Byrd was never charged or otherwise punished or disciplined for Ashli’s homicide,” the suit stated.

Video shot from the hallway outside the Speaker’s Lobby shows Mr. Byrd emerging in a shooting stance with both hands holding the Glock.

In his only public statements about the shooting—made not to investigators but to an NBC television anchor—Mr. Byrd never mentioned his radio dispatch or his claim that shots were being fired at him and other officers. Nor did he use that as justification for firing his weapon and killing Ms. Babbitt.

An unknown U.S. Capitol Police officer first reported shots fired in the U.S. House just before 2:43 p.m., followed later by Mr. Byrd’s shots-fired announcement, according to the audio recording obtained by The Epoch Times. Both reports turned out to be unfounded.

Officer: “Shots fired, House floor. Shots fired, House floor. Immediate assistance.”

Dispatch: “Shots fired, House floor. Shots fired, House floor.”

2nd Dispatcher: “I need units to re…,” which was cut off mid-sentence. That message ceased on the OPS2 channel but was heard in full on the OPS1 channel:

“I need units to respond to the chamber, the House chamber floor,” the dispatcher said. “Again, units need to respond to the House floor in reference to shots fired. They were shots fired at the House floor. Again, units to respond. They’re taking shots into the House floor. We need units to respond to that location. 1443 hours.”

Lt. Byrd: “405-B. We got shots fired in the lobby. We got fot (sic), shots fired in the lobby of the House chamber. Shots are being fired at us, and we’re prepared to fire back at them. We have guns drawn. [Unintelligible] Don’t leave that end! Don’t leave that end!”

Mr. Byrd’s dispatch was followed by 11 seconds of radio silence.

The transcript of the OPS2 radio communications provided by the Department of Justice (DOJ) as evidence in Jan. 6 criminal cases does not include the words “we’re prepared to fire back at them.” The DOJ transcript instead says, “and it went, so we locked it down.”

Dispatcher: “Simulcasting, shots fired on the House floor again.”

Lt. Byrd: “We’ve got an injured person. I believe that person was shot. It was…” (cut off by another transmission).

Unknown officer: “…Shot, one down, civilian. We need EMTs. We need… Come through on the west side of the building … to the House lobby.”

Dispatch: “That’d be House…”

Lt. Byrd: “405-B, did you copy?”

Dispatch: “I copied. House lobby, west side. Individual…”

Mr. Byrd retreated from the entrance to the seated area in the Speaker’s Lobby. Officer Mike Brown, a member of the USCP Containment and Emergency Response Team (CERT), said Mr. Byrd was “down and out and almost in tears.”

The revelation of Mr. Byrd’s previously undisclosed radio statements raises fresh questions about the shooting of Ms. Babbitt, 35, and the investigation that cleared him of potential charges of excessive use of force.

Ashli Babbitt's route inside the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (Illustration by The Epoch Times, Public Domain)

The DOJ report explaining why no charges were pursued did not mention Mr. Byrd’s radio dispatch.

Mr. Byrd never made a statement to internal affairs officers who investigated the shooting on behalf of U.S. Capitol Police. When he met with DC Metro internal affairs the night of Jan. 6, 2021, he said he wanted to retain an attorney before saying anything.

Mr. Byrd and his attorney did an informal walk-through of the shooting scene with a Capitol Police official in late January 2021 but he was never subjected to questioning.

DOJ Report Contained Errors

The DOJ report absolving Mr. Byrd from culpability included numerous errors and incorrect statements.

The report says that after the glass in the doors leading to the Speaker’s Lobby was smashed out, rioters “were then able to reach through the broken glass and push the chairs off the top of the barricaded furniture.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/after-shooting-ashli-babbitt-capitol-police-lt-made-false-radio-report-lawsuit

Hamas, PA, and UNRWA Educate Gaza Schoolchildren for Jihad

 Gaza Strip schools fostered the depraved sensibility that fueled the Oct. 7 butchery perpetrated by Hamas jihadists in southern Israel. While Hamas exercised dictatorial authority over the whole of jihadist indoctrination in Gaza, the Palestinian Authority (PA) produced the textbooks and lesson plans, and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in significant measure administered the schools. The defeat of jihadism in Gaza will not be complete without a fundamental reorientation of its educational system.

Given U.S. interests in Middle East stability in general and the post-Israel-Hamas war reconstruction of Gaza in particular, American policymakers must grasp the preaching of hatred, violence, and Islamist supremacy woven into Gaza education. One obstacle is that many U.S. diplomats – even more the younger career foreign service officers who staff them – will have been indoctrinated at American universities in opinions and ideas that bear an uncanny resemblance to certain ugly dogmas championed by the jihadists.

IMPACT-se (Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education) provides indispensable English language documentation of the training for terrorism inscribed in UNRWA Arabic language textbooks and other Hamas educational materials. The training falsifies history, encourages submission to government-sanctioned doctrines, and fosters loathing of Jews, Israel, America, and the freedom and democracy central to the West. Hamas’ savage rampage on Oct. 7 through Israel’s border communities was not a hideous departure from central tenets of Gazan education but rather gave faithful expression to them.

In “Al-Fateh – The Hamas Web Magazine for Children: Indoctrination to Jihad, Annihilation and Self-Destruction,” IMPACT-se examined 145 of the Hamas publication’s issues, from September 2002 to April 2009. Al-Fateh’s “consistent educational message to its young readers,” according to IMPACT-se, “mirrors that of the Hamas movement’s ideology and includes scathing hatred, disdain, delegitimization and demonization of the other – the West, especially the US and Europe, the Jews, Israel and Zionism – as well as a call for establishing an Islamic state in entire Palestine and the annihilation of the State of Israel through violent liberation of the land in jihad.”

Al-Fateh – in Arabic, “The Conqueror” – portrays “Jews as enemies of mankind and killers of prophets,” IMPACT-se shows. Rejecting compromise, negotiations, and peace agreements – those in operation and the pursuit of new ones – Al-Fateh advocates “total commitment to an armed and violent jihad, especially of the suicidal kind.” Through “its pervasive indoctrination of the younger generation into the cult of martyrdom,” Al-Fateh contributed to forming “the next generation of suicide bombers to join the violent jihad.”

Many Oct. 7 jihadists – who murdered Israeli parents in front of their children and Israeli children in front of their parents; humiliated, maimed, and raped Jewish women; mutilated corpses; and kidnapped mostly civilians – and many Gaza Palestinians who cheered on the sadistic killers grew up on Al-Fateh’s poisonous tenets. They learned from the Hamas magazine that Israel and the United States, along with their friends and partners, are evil and implacable adversaries: “the Jewish enemy kills our people in beloved Palestine, while the United States, Britain and the other European countries, and India help it.” They read that the United States is an omnipresent and insidious menace: “America is the terror, my child … she is the plague that destroys my liver … she is the viper that scatters poison inside me.” And they were informed that Islam confronts a globe-spanning war: “Muslims and their children everywhere are under a siege of injustice – in beloved imprisoned Palestine, in wounded Afghanistan, in Kashmir, in Chechnya, and in other parts of the world which are controlled by the most despicable of God’s creatures: the Jews, and their agents in crusader America.”

In “Review of 2022 UNRWA-Produced Study Materials in the Palestinian Territories,” IMPACT-se surveyed the curriculum overseen by UNRWA in West Bank and Jerusalem schools as well as those in Gaza. Contrary to the UN charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which affirm basic rights and fundamental freedoms, UNRWA’s Palestinian schools promulgate intolerance and Islamic supremacy. UNRWA education features “a systematic insertion of violence, martyrdom, overt antisemitism, and jihad across all grades and subjects, with the proliferation of extreme nationalism and Islamist ideologies throughout the curriculum, including science and math textbooks; rejection of the possibility of peace with Israel; and the complete omission of any historical Jewish presence in the modern-day territories of Israel and the PA.”

IMPACT-se released “UNRWA Education: Text Books and Terror” in November 2023. In addition to detailing praise that UNRWA staff members heaped on Hamas terrorists for the Oct. 7 slaughter and the role played by UNRWA school graduates in the barbarities, the report examines UNRWA educational materials that “either harness antisemitism or encourage martyrdom or violent jihad.”

For example, UNRWA teachers develop students’ reading comprehension through a story that celebrates suicide bombers and the decapitation of Israeli soldiers. A map for fourth graders in UNRWA schools erases Israel by placing a Palestinian flag over all the land between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean Sea. A fifth-grade reading lesson, “Hooray for the Heroes,” glorifies Palestinians “associated with war, violence, religious extremism, and Terrorism” but “does not include scientists, doctors, engineers, or athletes.” UNRWA schools teach sixth-grade students that “The Zionists are the terrorists of the modern age, and they are fated to disappear.”

In addition, documents IMPACT-se, UNRWA teachers instruct students that in Israel’s 1948 War of Independence – five invading Arab armies sought to annihilate the newborn Jewish state – Zionists were compelled by Jewish religious belief to massacre Arabs. UNRWA school lessons disparage peaceful lives while glorifying martyrdom in the fight against infidels (most prominently Jews and Christians) as a noble act that Allah will reward in heaven. Gazan students learn that jihad to liberate Palestine is a “private obligation for every Muslim.” That obligation emphatically includes girls and women: “Palestinian girls are encouraged to kill, be killed, and send their children to die.”

Israel’s destruction of Hamas as a fighting force and governing authority in Gaza will provide at best temporary reprieve if, after major military operations end, the PA and UNRWA continue to propagate jihadism through the schools. The United States would be in a better position to assist in thwarting this abuse of UN institutions and Palestinian children if America’s own educational system were not itself saturated with concepts that bear an alarming resemblance to those of jihadist indoctrination.

Although the U.S. public only recently has taken serious notice of the problem, American colleges and universities have for many years promulgated as campus orthodoxy the multilayered accusation that the country is divided into white oppressors and oppressed people of color, that the American political system is racist to its core, and that social justice requires redistributing wealth and power by discriminating based on race. Institutions of higher education that have abandoned their mission, which is to transmit knowledge and cultivate independent thinking, in favor of the reproduction of hard-left ideology, cannot be expected to form diplomats capable of grasping the harms caused by the UN-sponsored Palestinian education for jihad or of possessing the judgment and motivation to implement the urgently needed correctives.

Here as elsewhere, effective U.S. foreign policy depends on thoroughly reforming higher education in America.

Peter Berkowitz is the Tad and Dianne Taube senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. From 2019 to 2021, he served as director of the Policy Planning Staff at the U.S. State Department.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/01/07/hamas_pa_and_unrwa_educate_gaza_schoolchildren_for_jihad_150291.html