Search This Blog

Sunday, February 4, 2024

Fast-food prices set to rise at McDonald's, Chipotle and others as Cal. minimum wage hike looms

 Fast-food prices in California are set to rise this spring with businesses responding to the state’s $20 per hour minimum wage law for fast-food workers that will take effect on April 1, 2024.

The law was signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom last fall and will require a $20 per hour minimum wage at all restaurants with at least 60 locations nationwide – though the law includes an exception for restaurants that make and sell their own bread. 

Several major fast-food franchises, including McDonald’s and Chipotle, have already signaled that prices will have to rise in response to the increased labor costs.

"Everyone is going to have to pay more," Jack Hartung, chief financial officer of Chipotle, said in the Wall Street Journal. The California-based company expects to raise prices by about 5% to 9% more at its restaurants in the Golden State to cover the costs.

Hartung told the Journal in November that he expects Chipotle’s labor costs to rise in the 15% to 20% range, which he said is "significant enough that it puts a dent in our economics." 

He added at the time that although he didn’t see it having an immediate impact on restaurant opening plans, customers’ response to price hikes will factor into those decisions. Chipotle is expected to report earnings after the bell on Tuesday.

placeholder

McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski said on an earnings call in October that prices at the fast-food giant will have to rise even though the company hadn’t determined at the time how large the increases would be.

"Certainly, there’s going to be some element of that that does need to be worked through with higher pricing," Kempczinski said. "There’s also going to be things that I know the franchisees and our teams there are going to be looking at around productivity. How all of that plays out, there will certainly be a hit in the short term to franchisee cash flow in California; tough to know exactly what that hit will be because of some of the mitigation efforts."

California McDonalds restaurant

McDonald's is among the fast-food chains anticipating the need to raise prices in California due to the increased minimum wage. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images / Getty Images)

McDonald's is scheduled to report earnings before the opening bell on Monday.

TickerSecurityLastChangeChange %
CMGCHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC.2,482.12+40.73+1.67%
MCDMCDONALD'S CORP.297.05-1.03-0.35%
JACKJACK IN THE BOX INC.78.94-0.41-0.52%
QSRRESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.79.31-0.09-0.11%

Jack in the Box said during an earnings call in November that it expects to raise prices by 6% to 8% across the company primarily to address increased wage expenses stemming from the California law. The company will likely provide an update when it releases earnings later this month.

Some restaurants may turn to increased automation as a way of mitigating the impact of a higher minimum wage in the industry. 

Josh Kobza, the CEO of Burger King's parent company Restaurant Brands International, told investors during an earnings call in November that the chain plans to speed up its rollout of digital ordering kiosks, which let restaurant workers focus more on preparing food and can improve order accuracy, reducing stressful interactions between employees and customers.

"My point of view is we need to get this business to 100% digital," Kobza said. "We should have all of the order-taking done through digital ordering channels over time."

California’s minimum wage ticked up to $16 an hour in January for all jobs in the state – up from $15.50 an hour which was already the highest in the nation.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/fast-food-prices-rise-mcdonalds-chipotle-california-minimum-wage-hike-take-effect-this-spring

Dark Money Group Plows Millions Into Biden Campaign

 by Austin Alonzo via The Epoch Times (Emphasis ours),

President Joe Biden’s reelection effort will count on help from some anonymous friends.

In the 2024 general election, President Biden will be supported by numerous campaign committees and funds. One of the most significant will be FF PAC, also known as Future Forward. FF PAC has collected and will likely continue to collect millions from a nonprofit group, Future Forward Action USA, that shares leadership and a name with FF PAC.

According to FF PAC’s year-end financial summary filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on Jan. 31, the hybrid political action committee brought in $25.3 million in total receipts in 2023. Future Forward Action USA sent FF PAC about $8.3 million, or about a third of its total fundraising for the year.

In 2020, when then Vice President Joe Biden was squaring off against incumbent President Donald Trump, Future Forward USA Action was one of the most important benefactors of FF PAC. According to FEC records, it sent FF PAC $61 million between 2019 and 2020. That’s around 40 percent of the about $151.4 million FF PAC collected in the cycle.

For the 2022 midterm cycle, Future Forward Action USA sent about $16.3 million to FF PAC. That’s around 53.4 percent of the about $30.6 million FF PAC raised between 2021 and 2022.

Future Forward USA Action is a tax-exempt, non-profit 501(c)(4). This type of organization, according to the Internal Revenue Service, is often a so-called social welfare organization. The agency also bars private enrichment and supporting or opposing a specific political candidate. However, social welfare organizations are allowed to engage in some political activities as long as they are not the primary activity.

FF PAC is a hybrid PAC. It can solicit and accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, labor unions, and other political committees, according to the FEC. It must maintain two bank accounts—one for independent spending on advertisements or voter drives and another for making direct contributions to federal candidates.

(Left) President Joe Biden. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)  (Right) Former president Donald Trump. (John Fredricks/The Epoch Times)

As a 501(c)(4) group, Future Forward USA Action is not subject to the same disclosure requirements as other funds associated with political campaigns. FF PAC, President Biden’s principal campaign committee, Joe Biden for President, and his nonqualified joint fundraising committee, Biden Victory Fund, must release their financial information to the public on a regular basis.

In an election year like 2024, the FEC requires monthly disclosures of who’s giving money to these funds, how the funds are spending it, how much money the funds have in the bank, and which federal candidates the funds are spending to support or oppose.

For instance, in 2020, FF PAC reported it spent about $74 million to back the Biden effort and about $54.4 million to fight President Trump. In 2022, it spent about $8.6 million to oppose television personality Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania and about $2 million to endorse now Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), along with similar transactions supporting Democrat candidates for Senate.

Furthermore, the most significant donors are limited in how much they can give to a joint fundraising or campaign committee.

According to its FEC filings, the Biden Victory Fund is a nonqualified joint fundraising committee. That, according to the agency, means that it is a political committee working together with “one or more other political committees or unregistered organizations.”

A nonqualified fund, according to the FEC, can “receive limited financial and administrative support from a sponsoring organization that is not a corporation or a labor organization, such as a partnership or an unincorporated association.”

Future Forward USA Action is subject to no such requirements. Under the tax code, it doesn’t need to say who it’s getting its money from, doesn’t have a donation limit, and doesn’t need to report how much money it raised until the close of the tax year.

In effect, its spending activities in 2024 won’t be reported until the end of 2025.

(L-R) First Lady Jill Biden, President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Second Gentleman Douglas Emhoff join hands at a ”Reproductive Freedom Campaign Rally" at George Mason University on Jan. 23, 2024, in Manassas, Va. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

According to its 2022 Form 990 return obtained by The Epoch Times, the fund shares offices and officers with FF PAC. Chauncey McLean is listed as the president of FF PAC, where he earned $233,462 in 2022. He’s also the treasurer of FF PAC, according to its statement of organization filed with the FEC.

The listed address for both Future Forward organizations is a UPS Store located near Seward Square in Washington. FF PAC’s statement of organization doesn’t list a phone number. Its 990 lists the phone number of the Washington-based MBA Consulting Group.

The Epoch Times reached out to MBA Consulting Group and representatives of Mr. McLean but did not receive a reply by press time.

Future Forward USA Action in 2022, 2021, and 2020

FF PAC doesn’t have a website or social media presence. Future Forward USA Action maintains only a skeleton, two-page webpage that doesn’t list contact information. Instead, it gives the number for the U.S. Capitol switchboard.

In 2022, according to its tax records, Future Forward USA Action brought in about $65.7 million in total revenue, about $61.5 million in total expenses, and had about $7.5 million in net assets.

It described its organizational mission as creating “a stronger American democracy and [advocating] for common sense solutions.” It said it spent $57.9 million on “quantitative and qualitative research on issues of national importance then ran media campaigns informed by that research.”

Moreover, Future Forward USA Action sent “grants and other assistance” to 29 organizations. FF PAC was listed as the largest recipient, getting about $12 million.

In 2021, according to its tax records, Future Forward USA Action brought in about $12.6 million, spent $16.8 million, and ended the year with $3.3 million in net assets. It listed similar activities as 2022. It made grants to six organizations, the largest being a grant of about $3.4 million to FF PAC.

In 2020, according to its tax records, Future Forward USA Action raised about $150.9 million, spent about $149.4 million, and ended the year with $6.9 million in net assets.

In the same year, it spent $148.2 million on the same activities as 2022 and 2021. Seventeen organizations received grants. The largest recipient was FF PAC, which got about $60.3 million.

Future Forward USA Action didn’t disclose its donors in any of those years.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/dark-money-group-plows-millions-biden-campaign

'Sinema floats quick decision asylum plan'

 Sen. Kyrsten Sinema defended the fledgling border security deal she helped broker, hailing it as a path to end catch and release.

Catch and release is the practice of US Border Patrol releasing migrants who have been detained while they await a hearing in an immigration court, often to adjudicate an asylum claim. US immigration courts are currently mired with massive backlogs.

“Our law changes that and in the practice of capture, release,” Sinema (I-Ariz.) told CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday.

“So when people approach the border and say they want to enter our country to seek asylum they will go into … short-term detention, which means we take them into custody,” she went on.

“And we actually do an interview right then and there to determine if they meet the standard for asylum.”

She noted that individuals who do not meet that standard, which “is most of the migrants who are coming to our country right now,” will be returned to their home country under the bill.

While the text hadn’t yet been released as of press time, details of it, seen by The Post revealed it would create an authority to automatically reject migrants trying to enter the US once crossings exceed 5,000 in a day.

Kyrsten Sinema has not said whether she intends to vie for reelection.Getty Images

The deal, which Sinema, 47, helped negotiate with Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) has faced stiff resistance from House Republicans including Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.).

Former President Donald Trump has also pressed the GOP to scuttle it.

Republicans had demanded more robust border security provisions in exchange for President Biden’s $106 billion supplemental request featuring aid to war-torn Ukraine and Israel, which prompted the negotiations.

Sinema, who hails from a border state, stressed that there has been a lot of “misinformation” swirling around about the 5,000 figure.

“First of all, our law ends catch and release. But when too many people approach the border, asking to come in seeking asylum, we’re now mandating that the government actually shut down the border, if those numbers get to 5,000 a day,” she explained.

“But we’re permitting the government to actually shut down the border when it only gets to 4,000 approaches a day,” she said. “The reason we’re doing that is because we want to be able to shut down the system when it gets overloaded.”

Biden has vowed to sign the measure into law and use that power right away.

James Lankford represented Republicans in negotiations on the border agreement.CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
Chris Murphy has argued that Republicans are opposing the border agreement because of the 2024 election.AP

“While the current administration does bear responsibility for mishandling the border, we have to give new legal tools to the administration,” she stressed.

Some progressives such as Greg Casar (D-Texas) have panned the measure, arguing that it included too many concessions for Republicans and that expelling migrants could result in them getting exploited back home.

“We will believe that by quickly implementing this system, individuals who come for economic reasons, will learn very quickly that this is not a path to enter our country, and will not take the sometimes dangerous or treacherous trek to our border,” Sinema countered when asked about those concerns.

Sinema explained that while many migrants have legitimate asylum claims, there are also a plethora of “economic migrants” who are simply seeking a “better life.”

“They are not permitted to enter the country whenever they would like, and our new law will ensure that they can’t get into the country,” she said.

US Border Patrol posted record encounters for fiscal year 2023.James Keivom

During fiscal year 2023, which ended Sept. 30, a record-breaking 2.47 million migrant encounters were recorded along the Mexico frontier, according to US Customs and Border Protection.

Another 302,034 people illegally crossing the border were apprehended in December.

Sinema was first elected to the Senate as a Democrat before swapping her party affiliation in December 2022 amid a series of clashes against progressives.

Alongside Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Sinema helped torpedo several trillion dollar iterations of Biden’s so-called “Build Back Better” plan. Later in 2022, Biden managed to secure passage of the watered-down Inflation Reduction Act.

President Biden has urged Congress to send him the bill.Getty Images

The battle for her seat in Arizona is already underway with Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and former gubernatorial hopeful Kari Lake the two frontrunners in their respective parties.

Sinema, who has been coy about whether she intends on running, once again sidestepped the question. The filing deadline is in April.

“I think folks across Arizona and the country know that when I decide I’m going to work on something that’s important for our state and for our nation, I stay focused on it,” Sinema replied when asked about her reelection plans.

https://nypost.com/2024/02/04/news/kyrsten-sinema-defends-border-deal-as-she-pledges-it-will-end-catch-and-release/