Search This Blog

Friday, October 4, 2024

'Biden declares ‘collective bargaining works’ after deal struck'

 President Biden on Thursday hailed the agreement made between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) union and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX) to end the port strike, arguing that collective bargaining works and is essential to the economy.

“Today’s tentative agreement on a record wage and an extension of the collective bargaining process represents critical progress towards a strong contract,” Biden, who has stood behind the striking workers, said in a statement.

“Collective bargaining works, and it is critical to building a stronger economy from the middle out and the bottom up,” he added.

The ILA announced Thursday night that the USMX, which is an association of companies that operate East and Gulf Coast ports, agreed to boost pay for port workers and that union members would return to work immediately.

The president applauded all the parties involved for coming together to reopen the ports. He congratulated the ILA dockworkers, saying they “deserve a strong contract” and noted that they sacrificed to keep the ports open during the COVID-19 pandemic.

He also applauded the port operators and careers, and said all parties involved acted “patriotically” so that ports could reopen to ensure the availability of supplies for cleanup after Hurricane Helene hit the U.S.

The two-day strike could have had serious consequences for the U.S. economy and posed political issues for Biden and Vice President Harris.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4915156-port-strike-end-agreement/?tbref=hp

Biden student loan cancellation plan on hold again

 The Biden administration’s student loan cancellation plan has been put on hold once again in Missouri after brief celebration from advocates this week when another judge ruled the plan could move forward.

A federal judge in Missouri issued an injunction Thursday that blocks widespread debt relief, hours after Biden got a favorable ruling in Georgia.

The Georgia court had dismissed its own state from the legal challenge, saying Georgia officials could not demonstrate injury from Biden’s plan, and moved the case to Missouri, a state it said did have standing.

U.S. District Judge J. Randal Hall said that while the case is moved from Georgia and his temporary injunction against the plan expired, the Biden administration would be able to move forward with relief.

But the other Republican-led states challenging the plan — Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, North Dakota and Ohio — quickly asked the new judge in Missouri for the plan to be blocked.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Schelp granted that request Thursday evening.  

“This is a huge win for transparency, the rule of law, and for every American who won’t have to foot the bill for someone else’s Ivy League debt,” said Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey (R). 

The debt relief plan proposed by the administration would provide partial or full forgiveness to more than 27 million borrowers.  

The GOP states challenged the plan earlier this year, saying the administration does not have the authority to provide such relief. 

“The Department of Education is extremely disappointed by this ruling on our proposed debt relief rules, which have not yet even been finalized,” a spokesperson said in a statement. “This lawsuit was brought by Republican elected officials who made clear they will stop at nothing to prevent millions of their own constituents from getting breathing room on their student loans. We will continue to vigorously defend these proposals in court.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/education/4915768-biden-student-loan-cancellation-plan-debt-relief-missouri/

'Biden: ‘I don’t know’ if Netanyahu trying to influence election'

 President Biden on Friday said he wasn’t aware of whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was trying to influence the U.S. election, while noting no administration has been a stronger ally to Israel than his own.

In his first briefing room appearance of his presidency, Biden addressed Democratic concerns that the Israeli leader is ignoring Biden’s call to negotiate a Gaza peace deal and confronting Hezbollah and Iran in an effort to interfere with the White House race.

“No administration has helped Israel more than I have, none, none, none. And, I think Bibi should remember that,” Biden said.

He added, “And whether he’s trying to influence the election, I don’t know. But I’m not counting on that.”

The president has publicly and privately been frustrated with Netanyahu’s handling of the war in Gaza over the past year, which has killed thousands of Palestinian civilians. Monday will mark the anniversary of the Hamas attack against Israel that set off the war.

He was also pressed on if he wants to speak to Netanyahu and said he assumes that when Israel “makes an assessment on how they’re going to respond, we will have a discussion.” He added that his team and the prime minister’s team are in “constant contact” while they try to figure out their retaliation plan.

Biden a day earlier had caused waves in the markets when he said the U.S. and Israel were in discussions about the response to Iran’s missile attack earlier in the week, including the possibility they could strike Iranian oil fields.

On Friday, Biden suggested he would advise against such a move.

“The Israelis have not concluded what they’re going to do in terms of a strike,” Biden said. “That’s under discussion. If I were in their shoes I’d be thinking about other alternatives than striking oil fields.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4916489-biden-netanyahu-election-interference/

'Biden, post-Vance remarks, says he doesn’t know if election will be peaceful'

 President Biden on Friday said he thinks the upcoming 2024 election will be fair but expressed skepticism over whether it will be peaceful.

In his first briefing room appearance of his presidency, Biden was asked about his confidence there will be a free, fair and peaceful election in November.

“I’m confident it will be free and fair. I don’t know whether it’ll be peaceful,” he said.

“The things that Trump has said, and the things he said last time out—when he didn’t like the outcome of the election—were very dangerous. If you noticed, I noticed, that the vice presidential Republican candidate did not say he’d accept the outcome of the election. He hasn’t even accepted the outcome of the last election,” he added. “So, I’m concerned about what they’re going to do.”

Biden was referring to Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio)’s answer about the 2020 election during the vice presidential debate earlier this week. Vice President Harris’s running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), questioned Vance if former President Trump lost the 2020 election.

Vance replied, “Tim, I am focused on the future.”

“That’s a damning nonanswer,” Walz said in response.

The Harris campaign has since dropped an ad to hit Vance over the memorable campaign moment.

Biden in August similarly said he was “not confident at all” that there would be a peaceful transition of power if Trump loses the election in November.

“He means what he says. We don’t take him seriously. He means it. All this stuff about ‘if we lose, it’ll be a bloodbath,’” Biden said at the time, referencing comments Trump made in March that he and his allies insisted were about the economy.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4916644-biden-election-comments-peaceful/

Aid for Incumbents: The Electoral Consequences of COVID-19 Relief

 Jeffrey ClemensJulia A. Payson Stan Veuger

DOI 10.3386/w32962




The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented levels of federal transfers to state governments. Did this funding increase benefit incumbent politicians electorally? Identifying the effect of revenue windfalls on voting is challenging because whatever conditions led to the influx of cash might also benefit or harm incumbents for other reasons. We develop an instrument that allows us to predict allocations to states based on variation in congressional representation. We find that incumbents in state-wide races in 2020, 2021, and 2022 performed significantly better in states that received more relief funding due to their overrepresentation in Congress. These results are robust across specifications and after adjusting for a variety of economic and political controls. We consistently find that the pandemic-period electoral advantage of incumbent politicians in states receiving more aid substantially exceeds the more modest advantage politicians in these states enjoyed before the pandemic. This paper contributes to our understanding of economic voting and the incumbency advantage during times of crisis as well as the downstream electoral consequences of both the COVID-19 pandemic and of unequal political representation at the federal level.


You may have unlimited free access to working papers. Many colleges and universities have institutional subscriptions. If you are affiliated with a subscribing institution, please access this site through your on-campus IP address. This should permit unlimited downloads. Alternatively, you can register and confirm your email address. This will enable you to download working papers when you are away from your institution’s network.

Medical Debt isn’t Treated Like Consumer Debt

 A dozen years ago my wife had a minor service performed at a hospital outpatient clinic. The hospital business office told her the service was covered by her health plan. Months later a man called claiming he worked for the hospital and requested payment of more than $700. This was news to my wife, who asked for an invoice. He wouldn’t provide one. My wife refused to pay without an invoice explaining what she was paying for. Another person called again weeks later, but he too would not provide an invoice. She was willing to pay but needed a list of denied charges to contact her health plan. She never got one and the hospital also never got paid. They stopped calling.

Indeed, others have also found that when they owed money to a hospital or clinic, they could not tell what they were being asked to pay for. This following is from The Atlantic article ‘Nobody Knows What These Bills Are For’:
Catherine… is a white-collar worker in Pennsylvania.
Yet when she started calling hospitals, doctor’s offices, and collection agencies, she realized that nobody could tell her what she was paying for and why she was being charged a certain amount. Some bills had been forgiven; some were miscoded. “I was like, I’m not going to just send you $500 for this random you-know-what,” she told me. “My takeaway was: Nobody knows what these bills are for.” So she did not pay them. She tossed new ones in the trash.
She wants to pay her bills, she told me; she’s not the type to walk out on the tab. But “it’s like no one even knows how much my procedures are going to cost,” she said. “The whole thing is so convoluted.”
The Atlantic reports that in years past unpaid medical debt could make it harder to rent an apartment, buy a car and sometimes even harder to get a job. Catherine could even have faced legal trouble and have assets seized or a lien placed on her house.  Increasingly, medical debt is not treated like other consumer debts. About 40% of Americans owe money to a health care provider, such as a hospital, clinic or physician. A small proportion of Americans have significant medical debt, with 3 million people owing more than $10,000.
Medical debt is difficult to collect. Hospitals are experts at navigating third party payers’ bureaucratic rules but are far less competent at getting their patients to pay outstanding bills. The debs are often sold to debt collectors for pennies on the dollar. Yet patients are never offered the same deal. Americans who are both poor and sick are more likely to carry medical debt that their wealthier counterparts. This is partly because you’re less able to work if your health is bad. Patients also have little control over the bills they rack up.
People often have no idea how much a medical procedure might cost, what their insurance might cover, or how much they might end up owing. Shopping around is rare and difficult to do, and sometimes—if you’re brought to a hospital after an accident, say—impossible. Billing offices fudge the numbers they send to insurers and patients, taking into account who’s paying, for what, where, how, and when. Half the time the bill is wrong.
The three big credit bureaus no longer include medical debts of less than $500 on credit reports. Perhaps patients they think the charges are ambiguous, almost fake to the point that nobody can explain the services being billed. Hospitals often send patients a statement rather than a bill, that lists dozens disaggregated line items with list prices. Even the band aids and OTC pain relievers are listed at outrageous prices.
States are acting to protect consumers from aggressive medical debt collectors:
Federal agencies are eliminating the consideration of medical debt when underwriting loans such as government-backed mortgages and small-business loans. ColoradoRhode Island, and other states barred medical bills from credit reports. New York prohibited hospitals from putting liens on people’s homes and garnishing their wages; Delaware forbid companies from foreclosing because of medical debt; Florida and Virginia made it harder for providers or collectors to sue; Delaware and Maine banned creditors from charging interest on medical bills.
Not mentioned is Arizona, which recently capped the interest rates that could be charged.
The point of limiting aggressive collections on medical debt is an admission that much of the debt is ambiguous, overpriced, unfair and unlikely to every be paid. The Medical Industrial Complex is predicated on maximizing revenue against third party payers. Thus, insurers, health plans and government payers are their true customers, not patients. A deeper concern is the admission that medical debt is somehow different is more evidence that medical care has little in common with consumer markets.

For many years, our health care blog was the only free enterprise health policy blog on the internet. Then, when the NCPA closed its doors, the health blog stopped as well.

During this five-year hiatus no one else has come forward to claim the space. So, my colleagues and I have decided to restart the blog in connection with the Goodman Institute. We invite you and others to use this forum to share your views.

John C. Goodman,

https://www.goodmanhealthblog.org/medical-debt-isnt-treated-like-consumer-debt/

Number of Illegal Aliens Dumped Into Swing States Is Jaw-Dropping

 As the 2024 presidential election continues to get closer, new data showing how many illegal aliens have been purposely dumped into crucial swing states by the Biden-Harris administration is raising red flags. 

Keen political observers note how the tactic will benefit Democrats. 

The numbers come after Democrats on Capitol Hill refused to vote for legislation that would make it against the law for non-citizens to vote in federal elections. 

In Arizona alone, 78,000 non-citizens are registered to vote.