Search This Blog

Sunday, January 19, 2025

Lithuania 1st NATO Ally To Commit To Trump's 5% Defense-Spending Goal

 by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times,

Lithuania has announced plans to boost its defense spending to between 5 percent and 6 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP), becoming the first NATO country to make a firm commitment to President-elect Donald Trump’s request that allies spend at least 5 percent of GDP on defense.

The decision, announced on Jan. 17 by top Lithuanian officials, is driven by the Baltic nation’s determination to confront the threat of Russian aggression. Lithuania, which shares a border with Russia and its heavily militarized Kaliningrad exclave, has repeatedly emphasized the need to bolster its defenses.

Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda told reporters after a Jan. 17 meeting of the State Defense Council in Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania, that a historic decision has been taken to nearly double the country’s defense spending. Currently, Lithuania spends a little over 3 percent of its GDP on defense.

“The possibility of Russian military aggression is still real, but not imminent,” Nausėda said.

“We need to increase our efforts to strengthen defense and deterrence significantly, devoting more resources to this end.”

Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys clarified in a post on X that the country’s commitment to spend between 5 percent and 6 percent of GDP would start in 2026 and continue through 2030.

“Difficult times require bold decisions & leadership,” he wrote.

“We call on our allies to follow this lead. The era of passive ’sit-and-wait' strategies is over.”

The announcement, which comes days before Trump assumes office, makes Lithuania the first NATO ally to formally commit to the 5 percent of GDP spending target that the president-elect has demanded.

Trump has long criticized NATO members for not meeting the alliance’s 2 percent defense spending target and recently proposed a more ambitious 5 percent goal, saying during a Jan. 7 press conference at Mar-a-Lago that “they can all afford it.”

Poland, the current NATO leader in defense spending, has vocally supported Trump’s 5 percent target. However, Warsaw has framed its 5 percent support as an aspirational goal for all NATO members, suggesting it could take some countries a decade to achieve it. As of now, Poland has not officially declared when it will meet or exceed the 5 percent mark. Poland spent 4.12 percent of GDP in 2024 and projects that will rise to 4.7 percent in 2025.

In backing Trump’s call for the 5 percent target, Polish Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz told the Financial Times in a recent interview: “If we could afford to go into debt to rebuild after Covid, then we must surely find the money to protect ourselves from war.”

Poland, which shares a border with both Ukraine and Russia, has long argued that greater defense spending is needed to deter Russia. Overall, however, European NATO leaders have offered a mixed response to Trump’s demand for a significant defense spending boost. For instance, France is grappling with the challenges of managing a debt burden exceeding 110 percent of GDP, while Germany is constrained by constitutional limits on additional borrowing.

In 2014, NATO set a target that all members should be spending 2 percent of GDP by 2024.

By the end of 2023, 10 of 31 NATO members had reached the 2 percent goal, although projections published in June 2024 suggest that number could rise to 23 out of 32 in 2024, following Sweden’s accession.

When Trump took office in 2016, only five NATO members met the 2 percent minimum defense spending target; by the end of his presidency, that number had increased to nine.

https://www.zerohedge.com/military/lithuania-becomes-first-nato-ally-commit-trumps-5-defense-spending-goal

Trump security adviser doesn't rule out continued Chinese ownership of TikTok

 President-elect Donald Trump would not rule out continued Chinese ownership of TikTok if steps were taken to ensure that American users' data was protected and stored in the U.S., incoming National Security Adviser Mike Waltz told CNN on Sunday.

ikTok stopped working for its 170 million American users on Sunday after a law took effect banning the app's continued operation over U.S. politicians' concerns that Americans' data could be misused by Chinese officials.

Waltz told CNN the president-elect is working to "save TikTok" and doesn't rule out continued Chinese ownership coupled with "firewalls to make sure that the data is protected here on U.S. soil."

Trump has said he would "most likely" give TikTok a 90-day reprieve from a ban after he takes office on Monday, a promise TikTok cited in a notice posted to users on the app.

Waltz also spoke to CBS News on Sunday and said Trump needed time to sort out issues related to TikTok, while adding that an extension was needed for TikTok to evaluate proposed buyers.

However, Republican House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson sent contradictory signals, saying that he believed Trump would push for TikTok parent ByteDance to sell the app.

"The way we read that is that he's going to try to force along a true divestiture, changing of hands, the ownership," Johnson said. "It's not the platform that members of Congress were concerned about. It's the Chinese Communist Party."

Some of Trump's fellow Republicans in Congress have opposed the idea of the extension for TikTok.

Republican U.S. Senators Tom Cotton, who chairs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and Pete Ricketts said in a joint statement on Sunday that "there's no legal basis for any kind of 'extension' of (the ban's) effective date."

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/trump-security-adviser-doesn-t-rule-out-continued-chinese-ownership-of-tiktok/ar-AA1xsTjB

TikTok says it is restoring service in US

 TikTok said Sunday that it would be restoring service to U.S. users after blocking it the evening before.

In a statement, TikTok said its video platform was coming back online after President-elect Donald Trump provided assurances necessary to the company’s service providers.

"In agreement with our service providers, TikTok is in the process of restoring service," TikTok said in a post on X. "We thank President Trump for providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no penalties providing TikTok to over 170 million Americans and allowing over 7 million small businesses to thrive."

"It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States," the company added.

Just hours before the move from TikTok, Trump posted to Truth Social calling for the app to remain available.

Trump indicated in his post that he wanted it to be available in order to broadcast his inauguration Monday.

“I will issue an executive order on Monday to extend the period of time before the law’s prohibitions take effect, so that we can make a deal to protect our national security. The order will also confirm that there will be no liability for any company that helped keep TikTok from going dark before my order,” Trump wrote.

TikTok's availability remained limited as of early afternoon, with access to the platform's content avilable through web browsers.

The law banning TikTok, which was scheduled to go into effect Sunday, allows the president to grant a 90-day extension before the ban is enforced, provided certain criteria are met.

Under a law that President Joe Biden signed in April, TikTok would be banned unless its Chinese owner, ByteDance, sold the company to a non-Chinese buyer.

Prior to the ban’s implementation, both Biden and the incoming Trump administration appeared to reverse their earlier positions on TikTok.

During his campaign, Trump, who had advocated for a ban during his first term as president, came out in support of TikTok, saying he’d save the app.

After the Supreme Court greenlit the law on Friday, the Biden administration issued a statement saying it would not enforce the ban, leaving that responsibility to Trump.

But TikTok said those assurances were not enough to prevent the app from going dark, and on Saturday evening, the app was removed from app stores and service for American users was suspended.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/tiktok-says-restoring-service-us-users-rcna188320

With Trump In Power, Orbán Vows To Expel Soros Network From Hungary, Urges Euro Patriots Do Same

 by Liz Heflin via Remix News,

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who bet big on a Trump victory, is now making broad predictions about a “new golden age” for Hungary with Trump in the White House, while taking shots at Democrats and George Soros, including a promise to expel his organizations from Hungary.

“Everything will change, a different day will dawn over the Western world on Tuesday morning. The failed democratic governance in America will come to an end,” Magyar Nemzet reported Viktor Orbán as saying in his first interview this year with Kossuth Radio’s Good Morning Hungary! program.

Calling the Democratic Party and George Soros “a bunch of idiots,” Orbán claimed the Democrats want to force what they think is right on the world, including regarding migration, gender, and wa.

He further called U.S. Ambassador to Hungary David Pressman a “bully” who sought to “push Hungary into the globalist canon.”

“It is not in the Hungarian people’s thinking that a tyrant comes here and says that people from the other side of the world should come here and populate this region before us,” the Hungarian prime minister said, admitting that he “was not willing” to meet Pressman even once during his four-year tenure. 

Regarding Antal Rogán being put on the U.S. sanctions list, Orbán said this actually strengthened Rogán’s position in the government and that the U.S. move proves the minister is doing his job well. Although Rogán’s official title is minister of the Prime Minister’s Cabinet Office; Orbán mentioned his job specifically as being related to Hungary’s “intelligence/secret services” (titkosszolgálatok).

Believing that a Trump administration heralds a “new golden age” for Hungary, Orbán said that his top priority for 2025 is to send George Soros back to the United States, with the “expulsion of the Soros network from Hungary” starting this spring. Orbán also expressed his hope that “patriots elsewhere” will also do the same.

“It must be shown that the Soros network’s presence in Europe is contrary to the interests of the people,” he stated.

Stating that Brussels is in the pocket of George Soros, he said, “If there is corruption, this is it.”

Noting the start of a “new era in Brussels,” the prime minister said Brussels needs to “sober up” and “adapt.”

Although the prime minister lauded Hungary’s economic policy plans, he said they will only work if the war does not escalate and the sanctions policy is stopped. He also believes serious protective measures will be needed.

“Without Western money, there is no Ukraine. Ukrainian agriculture clashes with European agriculture, and its economy does not fit into the European system,” he added. 

Promising jobs and wage increases for everyone, he sees the middle class growing stronger in 2025, highlighting Hungary’s financial reserve system to boost consumption. Orbán also noted that Hungarians save an average of 24 percent of their income, compared to the EU average of 14 percent.

Energy will, as for many countries, remain a concern, especially with ongoing sanctions and as Hungary’s nuclear plant expansion (Paks II) will not be completed until. 2030-2032. Thus, keeping the TurkStream pipeline open will be of key importance. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-power-orban-vows-expel-soros-network-hungary-urges-patriots-across-europe-do

'As First 3 Israeli Hostages Freed, Biden Declares 'Today Guns In Gaza Silenced''

 Hamas has released the first round of three Israeli hostages on Sunday morning, and officials on both sides are hailing the ceasefire deal as it appears to be sticking. For the first time in well over a year, war has been quieted throughout the Strip.

Hostages Romi Gonen, Emily Damari, and Doron Steinbrecher first reached an Israeli military facility near the border with the Gaza Strip and have been reunited with their families, the IDF has announced. Israeli military spokesman Daniel Hagari in a press briefing said that Romi, Emily, and Doron and are now in "safe hands". He said, "They are now with us and on their way home."

Hostage freed, via Reuters

President Biden in a speech marking the exchange of hostages, and on his last day as US president, declared "Today, the guns in Gaza have gone silent."

"This is one of the toughest negotiations I’ve been part of … but we’ve reached this point today because of the pressure by Israel on Hamas backed by the US," he said.

"Now the region has been fundamentally transformed," he continued, given that both the Hezbollah ceasefire and now Gaza truce are holding. He noted that hundreds of humanitarian aid trucks are entering Gaza from Egypt to assist the desperate population.

United Nations secretary-general also welcomed the huge development in a post on X stating:

I welcome the start of the implementation of the ceasefire and hostage release in Gaza. We stand ready to support this implementation & scale up the delivery of sustained humanitarian relief to the countless Palestinians who continue to suffer.  

It is imperative that this ceasefire removes the significant security & political obstacles to delivering aid.

By day's end, the first 90 Palestinian prisoners are expected to be freed as part of the first hostage/prisoner swap. Over 1,000 total will be freed throughout the first 42-day phase of the deal, reports say.

Meanwhile, huge crowds are in central Tel Aviv throughout the night celebrating the release of the hostages, and a deal which some are seeing as a defeat for Netanyahu's stance of wanting to see the military operation through to the end (of Hamas' eradication).

But Hamas is clearly still intact, as now with the ceasefire in effect masked men with green headbands in scarfs have been seen openly on the streets of Gaza.

Biden and the UN chief in their initial remarks called for the deal to be fully implemented across their multiple phases, which will last weeks.

Large celebratory crowds in Tel Aviv watch hostages freed on big screens...

Hamas too said it plans to stick to its commitments inked in Doha, with spokesman Abu Ubaida saying in video address, "The agreement reached could have been made a year ago if it had aligned with [Prime Minister] Netanyahu’s ambitions." He added: "We are committed to the ceasefire agreement, but this depends on the enemy’s adherence."

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/today-guns-gaza-silenced-biden-says-first-3-israelis-freed

Americans Remain In Dark Over Origins Of Mysterious Drones

 by Janice Hisle via The Epoch Times,

For the past decade, Jennifer Krazinski felt safe living in a home “tucked away, off of a dirt road,” in Hewitt, a northern New Jersey suburb.

But what she recently saw in the night sky left her disquieted.

Near her house, Krazinski noticed flying objects with blinking red-and-white lights, emitting a whirring sound.

After three consecutive nights in mid-December 2024, “I stopped looking for them because it just was overwhelming,” she told The Epoch Times. “This makes me uneasy.”

Krazinski worried that someone was using drones to collect information for some nefarious purpose. But she decided against alerting authorities already inundated with similar reports of apparent drone sightings.

Weeks later, specific answers elude Krazinski and thousands of other Americans who spotted Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).

Reports came from at least a half-dozen U.S. states since mid-November 2024 and sparked a wave of concern.

After government officials and drone experts gave non-threatening explanations for nearly all the sightings, the hoopla over so-called “mystery drones” dissipated. However, questions lingered.

President-elect Donald Trump has promised that, soon after his Jan. 20 inauguration, he will release more details about the drone sightings; he said it was “ridiculous” that federal officials had been so tight-lipped.

Because of the attention, the public is more aware of drones—a plus for U.S. drone-makers and sellers.

Drone industry leaders also say the incidents underscore an ongoing dilemma: How to balance security needs and airspace-use restrictions against the drive to innovate drone capabilities and uses?

The need to fine-tune drone regulations and procedures is becoming more critical, considering how fast the industry is growing, experts said.

The Skyfall Vampire drone and SHRIKE FPV drone from Ukraine are displayed in the Ukrainian technology pavilion at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas on Jan. 7, 2025. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had registered more than 1 million drones as of last month.

And drone use is expected to continue surging.

Worldwide drone sales now total about $30 billion per year; in 10 years, that figure could burgeon to nearly $224 billion, according to Fact.MR’s market research.

Allan Evans, CEO of Unusual Machines, an Orlando-based drone technology company, told The Epoch Times that the spate of sightings dramatically changed Americans’ perceptions of drones.

The incidents also exposed “a really big gap in airspace management:” a need to better identify, track, and coordinate drone use,” Evans said.

“And people are interested in solving that, rather than just dismissing drones as toys ... a novelty item.”

People also are now interested in figuring out “how to organize and use these tools and handle concerns over them being used the wrong way,” Evans said, calling the “toys-to-tools” drones perception “a major shift” in American society.

He cited another realization that has settled in: “I think it’s the first time we’re like, ‘Oh yeah, okay, drones are everywhere all the time.’”

Unusual Machines, which strongly focuses on the consumer drone market, attracted a lot of first-time buyers this past year, Evans said.

Although sales data were not yet releasable, Evans said the drone sightings seemed to have stoked much of the new enthusiasm.

Evans and three other industry professionals told The Epoch Times that citizens and government leaders are justifiably concerned about UAP sightings and drone activities.

However, they also cautioned against jumping to conclusions or panicking based on flawed, distorted, or limited information.

These experts addressed inaccurate claims about drones and suggested how government agencies might handle drone-related issues better.

About the Sightings

Gabriel Garcia, technical director for SPS Aerial Remote Sensing, a Texas company specializing in counter-drone technology, said he thinks people were filing a lot of false reports, unintentionally.

People who are unfamiliar with the nighttime appearance of various aircraft may have misidentified some crewed aircraft as unmanned drones, he said.

Many types of aircraft, including drones, are equipped with white, red, and green lights to aid navigation and avoid collisions. Numerous witnesses reported seeing these lights on the unidentified objects.

Garcia believes authorities know a significant amount of information about the suspected drones.

That’s because the FAA requires drones to be equipped with “a sort of virtual license plate,” which broadcasts a traceable signal, Garcia noted.

That signal provides a lot of data, he said, including GPS coordinates of the drone’s pilot, timestamped actions, altitude, and speed.

Some of the aircraft that aroused suspicions may have been flown by operators who were ignorant of regulations or careless about drone use, Garcia said.

Concerned citizens wondered why authorities didn’t “just shoot them down” to examine them. But Garcia said that would be unsafe, unnecessary, and illegal without special permission.

The Red Cat ARACHNID family of drone systems: (L–R) Black Widow, FlightWave Edge 130, and FANG displayed in a company-provided photo. Red Cat Holdings

First, there’s a “grave risk” that innocent people can be injured by ammunition gone astray or falling debris, Garcia said.

Federal law forbids damaging or disabling aircraft, including drones; violations carry heavy penalties. However, police in Long Island, New York, late last year obtained authority to shoot down the drones.

Rather than shoot the drones, authorities can remotely take over control of a drone. “They can tell it where to go and where to land with a much, much safer outcome,” Garcia said.

Another misconception is that some of the drones were reportedly bus-sized.

Jeff Thompson, CEO of Red Cat Holdings, a Department of Defense (DOD) drone contractor in Nevada, said: “There’s not a drone configuration out there that can make a small bus fly like a small drone you see at the beach; that just doesn’t exist.”

Thompson told The Epoch Times that the inaccurate description took hold because “everyone just started repeating it, and it became like a thing, even though it wasn’t true.”

Demonstration of technology used to detect, track, and identify unauthorized drones crossing the U.S.–Mexico border. Courtesy of SPS Aerial Remote Sensing and TrellisWare

‘Not Enemy Drones’

Many people wondered aloud whether foreign adversaries deployed the suspected drone swarms as a spy operation. Thompson refuted that notion.

“These are not enemy drones,” Thompson said. “There’s no way it was an enemy. They wouldn’t put on FAA lighting ... that’s just ridiculous—or they’re the dumbest enemy.”

Drones used for reconnaissance or other military missions fly without lights, he said; these drones are even undetectable by a person wearing night-vision goggles.

“Our drones are stealth, and you want them stealth,” Thompson said.

Robert Newcomb, a Utah-based weapons engineer and DOD contractor who works with drones, agrees that many UAP reports can be chalked up to misidentifications of manned aircraft or heavenly bodies, such as pulsars—rotating stars.

Based on Newcomb’s career knowledge, the reported objects seem to be “nothing out of the ordinary,” he said.

Newcomb said the sightings didn’t set off alarm bells for him.

“Usually, if it’s going to be a threat, they’re going to act quickly,” he said. The drones caused no apparent harm as they hovered or flitted about the sky for prolonged periods.

Further, Newcomb said, U.S. agencies have capabilities for detecting and engaging threats in airspace.

“Should we be fearful? The answer is a hard ‘no,’” he said. “But there’s a caveat to that.”

A still from a video showing several drones that appear to be flying over Randolph, N.J., on Dec. 4, 2024. MartyA45_ /TMX via AP

Valid Concerns

He is worried about “the unknown threats that have come over the border” in recent years.

“There’s likely hundreds of terrorists in the country who are probably planning nefarious acts,” Newcomb said. “Whether they’re going to use drones or other means, that’s unknown.”

And drones, too, are illegally crossing the U.S.–Mexico border, Garcia said. His company has partnered with certain U.S. agencies to detect, track, and identify unauthorized drones.

“We’re looking at activity happening every single day: Drones crossing the border, drones getting used by the cartels to provide surveillance on border control positions and be able to route the human trafficking operations,” Garcia said.

Technology of any kind can be misused, the experts noted, adding that people are naturally curious about new advances and tend to be leery of them.

“Do you remember when cellphones first had a camera? At the time, there were all kinds of privacy concerns around it,” Evans said.

“But I think it worked out OK, right? Like, there’s always going to be resistance to these changes, and there’s always going to be very valid concerns.”

Initially, people worried that drone operators would be spying on them in their homes.

Noting that drones can be used by law enforcement, hospitals, and package-delivery businesses, Evans said people also are starting to recognize that drone management is “not just an FAA problem.”

Drones are deployed during a demonstration at the Los Angeles Fire Department ahead of DJI's AirWorks conference in Los Angeles on Sept. 23, 2019. Drones are proving to be a game changer for emergency responders who are increasingly using the technology to spot fires, detect toxic gas, or to locate missing people or suspects, experts say. Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images

He said the issue now is “How do these different agencies all coordinate?” ranging from local police to state personnel and the federal government.

New uses for drones are emerging frequently, he said, including transporting a flotation device to a drowning victim.

“But you can’t do it unless there’s rules around doing it and coordinating the airspace,” Evans said, noting that helicopters or other aircraft might also need to fly near such an emergency scene.

“I think you’re going to see more and more really great applications as we get better and better at it.”

Signs of Improvement

Policymakers appear to be heading in the right direction—in a bipartisan manner, Evans said, noting that several proposals have either been approved or are in the works to improve airspace management and tighten security.

On Jan. 2, Michael Robbins, head of a drone industry advocacy group, issued a statement urging federal officials to end U.S. reliance on “unsecure” technologies from Chinese-subsidized companies “and to invest in U.S. and allied products and support security and fair market competition.”

Commenting on proposed new rules governing drones, Robbins, president of the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International, said: “We stand ready to work closely with the incoming Trump administration to generate a stronger, more secure drone technology supply chain.”

President-elect Donald Trump is slated to take office on Jan. 20; his son, Donald Trump Jr., serves on the advisory board for Evans’ company, which says it is committed to “onshoring U.S. drone component manufacturing.”

Thompson, who founded Unusual Machines and now directs its board, points out that the U.S. government has been combating security concerns about foreigners’ use of drones against the United States.

Many people feared that Chinese-made drones and drone parts might be used to gather intelligence that would jeopardize the United States.

Workers produce drones at a factory in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on April 13, 2023. STR/AFP via Getty Images

In response, the U.S. government began taking steps in 2018 to end the federal government’s use of Chinese drones and Chinese-made drone parts, he noted.

In 2023, the American Security Drone Act “basically stated that anyone that receives a federal penny cannot buy Chinese drones or parts and has to get rid of what they have,” Thompson said.

Because of drone use in the Ukraine–Russia war, “everyone realizes how important these drones are for war,” Thompson said, “and nobody wants Chinese drones flying around the United States, mapping out the entire infrastructure, because they do actually transmit information back to China servers for you to be able to log onto your drone.”

Experts Offer Suggestions

Still, drone regulations need to be streamlined to ensure progress, the experts agree.

“Our nation’s defense is going to depend on drones going forward,” Thompson said.

Newcomb fears that over-regulation will “stifle innovation ... and how the technology advances.”

He suggests that “instead of forcing every drone to be tracked, we just offer an airspace for them to operate in.”

Evans commended the FAA for its emphasis on safety, which enables Americans to travel more safely in an airplane than in a car, federal data and numerous studies show.

Likewise, Evans believes the FAA is “doing a really good job of balancing the need for innovation” against security concerns.

Ukrainian servicemen of the 22nd Brigade launch a Leleka reconnaissance UAV drone near Chasiv Yar on April 27, 2024. Genya Savilov/AFP via Getty Images

“They’re doing a lot of exceptions. They’re doing a lot of test programs. They’re enabling a lot of the exploratory stuff,” he said.

At the same time, the FAA is concerned about avoiding “an overzealous cowboy environment that could lead to really dangerous things, with stuff falling out of the sky,” Evans said.

All four drone experts who spoke to The Epoch Times were unanimous in their recommendations that federal agencies communicate better with each other.

Garcia noted that the FAA “has no authority to take down a drone,” and therefore must rely on help from other federal agencies.

Newcomb said that officials need to answer questions from citizens more directly, rather than deflecting, and they can acknowledge that security concerns prevent them from disclosing certain details.

Garcia and Newcomb emphasized a need for the government to invest more heavily in counter-drone technology.

However, the experts concurred that federal agencies seem to be confronting drone-related concerns more effectively.

“I think we’re on the path to solving it,“ Newcomb said, ”to ensure that our airspace is safe.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/americans-remain-dark-over-origins-mysterious-drones

Trump return prompts reset by struggling media outlets

 President-elect Trump’s return to the White House is forcing a major shift in editorial tone by some of the nation’s leading mainstream news outlets.  

News organizations like The Washington Post, CNN and others are again hoping to capitalize on a so-called Trump Bump in audience, as many of them did eight years ago. 

But a number of people inside the media told The Hill ahead of Inauguration Day that this effort is likely to be an uphill climb.  

Some political observers saw Trump’s November victory, which came as he either ditched or attacked top news outlets in favor of social media and internet platforms, as an indictment on the mainstream press’s credibility and influence on American voters.  

“It’s pretty clear the biggest loser of the 2024 election was the mainstream media,” one national political reporter told The Hill this week. “A lot of these outlets are completely lost, and the vibe is basically one of fear and insecurity as Trump takes over again.” 

A significant shift

There are signs of a significant shift in national newsrooms across the country.

he Washington Post, which during Trump’s first term built up its national subscriber base around aggressive coverage of his administration, has under its present leadership telegraphed a new emphasis aimed more at moderation in its political reporting. 

Just days ahead of Trump taking office, the Post rolled out a new mission statement vowing to deliver “Riveting Storytelling for All of America” in the face of a wave of key staff departures and lost subscriptions in response to the apparent pivot.   

A source at the Post this week downplayed the outlet’s subscriber losses and said it had won back 20 percent of the subscriptions lost after billionaire owner Jeff Bezos killed an editorial that endorsed Vice President Harris just before the election.  

Dynamics on cable news are also noticeably different than during the first Trump term. 

CNN, which under former network President Jeff Zucker reaped major ratings and advertising dollars while Trump was in office, has for months shown a softer touch in covering the incoming president while it continues to take viewership losses.  

MSNBC, meanwhile, plans to bring progressive pundit Rachel Maddow back to a nightly schedule hosting in prime time during Trump’s first 100 days. This is widely seen as a move to counter the cable network’s postelection ratings dip. 

Fox News has seemingly repaired its relationship with the incoming president after years of tension and legal fallout stemming from his 2020 election loss.   

Trump’s ascendance comes at a time when these news organizations and many others have seen their audiences slashed and bottom lines threatened, exacerbated by a growth in social platforms for news junkies and polling showing widespread distrust in the mainstream media by large numbers of Americans. 

“Over the past decade, appealing to partisan tribal identities has been the best way to attract and keep news audiences. If that continues to be the case, it’s hard to see how The Washington Post’s new mission — to reach ‘all of America’ — is going to be a winning economic formula,” said Rodney Benson, a professor of media and culture at New York University.  

Some political operatives on the right, who saw mainstream media coverage of Trump’s first term as overly hostile, say the way the press covered Trump’s first term unwittingly did him a favor.  

“I do expect that the media coverage will be a little different in tone,” one national Republican strategist told The Hill this week. “Not because the media is all of a sudden planning on being more objective and less biased, but because they probably finally recognize that their over-the-top hysterical coverage has done nothing but help Trump politically.”  

It is unclear if outlets will experience any kind of “Trump Bump” in 2025, or which news organizations will benefit the most from his second term.  

But observers say a diminished corporate media landscape creates an opening for new independent political journalism during his second term.  

“To the extent that there is a Trump bump, I would expect to see more of it going to smaller and more independent news outlets, as opposed to the likes of the Washington Post and MSNBC,” predicted Victor Pickard, a professor of political media at the University of Pennsylvania. 

General news fatigue is also a contributing factor, Pickard said.  

“The sad business state of the general news media landscape translates to less capacity and a general degradation in the quality of media coverage,” he added.  

Some journalists who have decided to go it their own are making criticism of corporate media in the age of Trump a rallying cry.  

“We’re at an inflection point for democracy and we need an unabashed free press to confront that. And the mainstream media, including The Washington Post, is failing to meet that moment,” Jennifer Rubin, a longtime columnist who left the Post this week to start her own media venture told The Hill. “The philosophical conflict was too great for me, and I decided we needed to do something different and better.” 

Rubin said her new project, a Substack-based outlet called The Contrarian, notched more than 125,000 subscribers on its launch date. 

Steve Schiffman, a former executive at the Post and now a media consultant, said the all the lessons from Trump’s first term are not clear cut, leaving many outlets to constantly assess the way they do business.  

“There is definitely still an ambiguity about how to best cover this person who is just so non-presidential,” Schiffman said. “But one thing we now know is covering him in a very clinical way is very clearly not what people want, irrespective of what side of the aisle they’re on.”  

https://thehill.com/media/5092370-trump-bump-mainstream-media/