Search This Blog

Friday, October 3, 2025

BlackRock, Canada Pension's infrastructure play boosted as Minn. OKs buyout

 Minnesota power regulators on Friday approved a $6.2 billion plan for a BlackRock unit and Canada Pension Plan to buy utility Allete, parent of Minnesota Power, saying recent modifications by the parties should address concerns about rates and clean-power investments.

The outcome of a meeting of the Minnesota Public Utility Commission, which was webcast, may reassure investors that BlackRock will be able to address regulatory and antitrust concerns as its Global Infrastructure Partners unit, which it bought last year, presses to buy other utilities.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/blackrocks-infrastructure-play-gets-boost-194108724.html


'Meta, Pembina may be near deal on Alberta AI data center'

 Meta Platforms, Inc. and Pembina Pipeline Corp. are supposedly close to an agreement on building an artificial intelligence data center in Alberta, the Logic reported on Friday.

According to the media platform, which cited sources with knowledge of the matter, the Canadian energy infrastructure company will partner with Kineticor, another Canadian-based firm that operates power generation facilities, in order to provide natural gas-fired electricity. Moreover, the Logic also disclosed that a definitive framework is still under discussion, but that the regulatory parts of the agreement, if reached, could be announced later in the day.

Pembina's shares jumped by 5.54% during trading hours at 2:22 pm ET, following the release of the report.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Meta-Pembina-may-be-near-deal-on-Alberta-AI-data-center/64924605

UN migration chief meets pope, says she's 'using' his 'moral authority' for her own agency

 


Following his blessing of a block of ice on behalf of a group of global warming fanatics, Pope Leo went himself one better on the wokester front by gladhanding and apparently "partnering" with the United Nations's migrant-surge promotion group, the International Organization for Migration, now led by Joe Biden's chief advisor for immigration, Amy Pope. She's been in that office since 2023, having taken a month off from her job to "campaign" for the six- or seven-figure position (the U.N. won't say), according to her own account.

This is from EWTN:

The Vatican News piece is here -- and here are some highlights:

So, we spoke about the need for the Church to work together with organizations like ours, which serve people on the most basic needs to advocate together to continue to build awareness and support for them. We also spoke about the importance of reframing the issue of migration at a moment in time where polarization is at an all-time high.

And this, in response to a question about what the pope can do to sustain her U.N. agency (emphasis added):

Clearly, he provides a level of moral authority to communities around the world. And that's really important at this moment in time, when the issue of migration has become, as I mentioned, hyper politicized and polarized.

We want to reorient the conversation back to what is human and how we as humans can connect and provide support, how we can help integrate communities, how we can enable migrant students, for example, to get access to education or migrant workers to get access to jobs that pay properly, where they have proper treatment.

So, part of it is using the moral authority that the Church brings.

 

Anyone detect anything insulting in that particular statement?

This person has deputized the Vatican to act as her organization's little pawn by providing "moral authority" to their mission to promote open borders and all the misery that has already entailed, from deaths in the Darien Gap, to child trafficking rackets, to the current repatriations necessary to restore rule of law in the U.S. It has also led to a lot of crimes against Americans -- from Chilean burglary gangs, to apartment terrorization, beatings and takeovers, to murders of young innocent women and girls. Now that word is out on that string of atrocities, the Vatican, and the pope, are now to be her faithful houseboy in her continuing mission to replace the electorate.

IOM, recall, was one of the great moneybags financing Joe Biden's border surge, back millions and millions were flooding the border, or being flown in in the dead of night for seeding among unsuspecting inland red communities, fattening cartel coffers with "crossing fees" that have wrought hell on Mexico, and allowing untold numbers of criminals to roll in with them. That was when Pope was Biden's top immigration advisor.

Here is what IOM was up to at the time:

They were paying for the flights inland, as well the free hotels and other goodies, taking zero responsibility for the criminals rolling in, the child labor rackets, the bankruptcy of community coffers, and the havoc from a crush of humanity too big to assimilate. Those costs were to be paid by ordinaryAmericans, just as the lion's share of IOM own budget was (and still is) paid for by the U.S. -- and she wants $100 million more.

Now she's looking to start a propaganda war, to get the U.S. public to say 'thank you, may I have another' to more mass migration, literally "using" the pope, as she put it, as her mouthpiece.

If I were the pope, I'd be insulted.

I'd be very wary of being dragged into a political scheme like this, a quest for political power by the Democrats, whose aim is to replace the electorate by importing new foreign Democrat voters. I'd balance that gladhanding meeting (though we don't know what they said in private) with a meeting of victims of migrant crimes.

Pope herself is a political actor -- a veteran of Harry Reid's sleazy dirty-politics machine, where she got her start, and then as an advisor to Barack Obama, whose border surge politics got the ball rolling. After that, of course, she became Biden's chief immigration advisor and her record of surging the border speaks for itself -- a horrendous failure so vast it cost the Democrats the last election -- before moving onward and upward to the palmy offices of the U.N., traveling the world first class like Samantha Power, and "dancing" with migrants.

Now she wants to use Pope Leo for her propaganda mission to browbeat voters into supporting her open borders project, effectively turning the pope into her useful idiot.

It's disgusting.

Here's some appropriate commentary from a Marine Marine captain and author:

I really, truly, hope that the pope, whose mission is to lead the Church on an eternity basis, does not let her "use" him or his office this way. Pope Leo's gentle call for humane treatment of migrants is reasonable and supportable, but jumping in to join the open-borders enticement of economic illegal immigrants who would never leave their homelands otherwise is pure worldly politics of the most abominable sort, using the world's lower-middle classes for a leftist political project to change the electorate and never mind the trail of misery that has followed.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/10/un_migration_chief_meets_pope_says_she_s_using_his_moral_authority_for_her_own_agency.html

Putting Patients In Charge, Not In Line To Die

 


The current federal government shutdown is framed by Democrats as an attempt to “protect Medicaid” enrollees from “devastating” cuts in coverage by the Trump administration. Republicans argue that Medicaid should be focused on truly medically vulnerable citizens and should not be paying for illegal residents or healthy adults who have returned to work. Both sides miss (or ignore) the real point: the U.S. healthcare system is failing Americans because it rewards bureaucracy, not care, effectively wasting trillions of dollars a year.

Medicaid was never meant to be the sprawling entitlement it is today. In 1965, it was designed to cover less than 2% of the population, specifically those who were truly medically vulnerable. Following expansions under President Obama’s Affordable Care Act and the COVID lockdowns and emergency declarations of both the Trump and Biden administrations, nearly one in four Americans is now enrolled. Many are healthy, working-age individuals eligible for employer coverage.

Republican proposals to trim Medicaid would improve the rolls, reduce its $900 billion annual price tag, and focus resources on those who genuinely need help. Medicaid is not only fiscally unsustainable but also medically inefficient, with too many dollars lost to “BURRDEN”—bureaucracy, unnecessary rules, regulations, directives, enforcement, and noncompliance.

When administrators are paid first, too little remains for providers, and the result is deadly. Medicaid enrollees often suffer long wait times and literally die waiting for care—“death by queue.” Georgia’s new Medicaid Pathways program spent $54 million on bureaucracy last year while delivering just $26 million in actual healthcare.

Georgia is not an outlier; it’s the norm. Medicaid spends more and more on BURRDEN, leaving less and less for patients. Meanwhile, the American Medical Association reported national health spending in 2023 rose to $4.9 trillion—$14,570 per person—outpacing GDP growth. Americans are paying more, waiting longer, and dying in line.

The U.S. doesn’t lack spending. It lacks a system that prioritizes patients over paperwork.

Consider employer-sponsored insurance. A $300 billion federal tax exclusion means workers never see part of the money they earn. Instead, it flows into costly, one-size-fits-all coverage chosen by HR, creating “job lock” that traps employees in positions solely for the sake of insurance.

Medicaid’s spending formula magnifies the problem. States get more federal money the more they spend, with little to no accountability. Programs waste billions on administration while patients go untreated. Studies show Medicaid enrollees often fare no better than the uninsured, and one-third of doctors refuse new Medicaid patients.

Meanwhile, outdated certificate-of-need laws, scope-of-practice limits, and cumbersome, time- and money-wasting billing mandates restrict supply, reduce competition, and drive up costs. Administrative expenses consume up to 50% of U.S. healthcare spending, double the OECD average. Nearly one-fifth of the U.S. GDP is allocated to healthcare, yet incentives ensure that the bureaucracy thrives while patients wait for care that never comes.

The result: bigger bills, longer waits, and fewer choices for families—while bureaucrats prosper. Real reform means flipping incentives so patients, not administrators, come first.

Here’s how:

First, shift the tax benefit from employers to employees. Give families control of their healthcare dollars in no-limit health savings accounts. That means higher wages, portable coverage, and personalized plans.

Second, block grant Medicaid to the states. Washington’s open-ended funding fuels overspending. Capped support would encourage state innovation, such as time-limited personal HSAs for Medicaid that promote self-sufficiency.

Third, cut red tape. Repeal certificate-of-need laws and scope-of-practice restrictions so more professionals can meet patient needs directly.

Fourth, unleash innovation. Price controls, FDA delays, and politically driven subsidies weaken America’s biotech edge as China races ahead. Patients win when innovators compete to deliver faster cures at lower costs.

These reforms would lower costs and restore the principle that healthcare should serve families, not bureaucracies. Workers would see higher take-home pay. Patients would gain faster access to care. Americans would benefit from lower prices and new treatment options.

Washington’s spending doesn’t measure compassion. It’s measured by whether a parent can get a sick child treated promptly, whether seniors can afford their prescriptions, and whether breakthroughs reach patients promptly.

Healthcare reform isn’t about Washington saving the system it broke. It’s about trusting We the People (“We the Patients”), empowering states, and unleashing free markets. Until we enable patients and providers instead of bureaucrats and politicians, we’ll keep pouring trillions into a system where Americans pay for the privilege of waiting in line to die.

Vance Ginn, PhD, is president of Ginn Economic Consulting, and previously served as chief economist of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget during the first Trump administration. Follow him on X @VanceGinn or visit vanceginn.com. He co-authored Empower PATIENTS – Two Doctors’ Cure for Healthcare with Dr. Deane.

“Dr. Deane” Waldman, MD, MBA, is professor emeritus of pediatrics, pathology, and decision science; and former director of the New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange. Follow him on X @DrDeaneW or visit deanewaldman.com.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/10/putting_patients_in_charge_not_in_line_to_die.html

Portland Police Detain Sortor, Not Antifa Soldiers, Spurring White House Probe

 White House officials are alarmed by the arrest of conservative journalist Nick Sortor in Portland. Sortor was taken into custody late Thursday night while documenting Antifa terror cells creating chaos outside a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility.

The arrest occurred after the Portland Police Bureau reported that it was "monitoring the protest during the evening and observed some protest participants engaging in fights." Sortor was charged with second-degree disorderly conduct.

"This was as big of a surprise to me as it was to everybody else. All of a sudden, you know, I'm being jumped by Antifa thugs," Sortor told Fox News' Bill Melugin following his release from jail. "I get back up, I stumble away and go back toward cops where I think, you know, at least, all right, well, maybe that'll be a safer place for me to go… never suspected that I was going to be the target of the arrest, that they were coming in to me."

"And when they put me into handcuffs, the first thing that went to my mind wasn't, 'Oh, you're being arrested.' It's, 'Oh, they're trying to help you and get you out of here and make it look like they're doing something.' Because they weren't telling me what they were doing. They weren't telling me I was under arrest. They weren't telling me what I was being charged with. And it took over an hour for me to find out what I was charged with," Sortor continued. 

The journalist said Antifa "threw multiple punches at me. They broke my camera by hitting that. So I was on the ground at that point. I tried to swing. I missed. I think I have every right to swing on somebody that has got me on the ground after punching me and after breaking my equipment." 

Yet, the Portland Police Bureau arrested the journalist, not the Antifa woke warriors who despise free speech, instead promote a communist-inspired agenda.

This troubling arrest prompted Attorney General Pam Bondi to begin an investigation into what Sortor called "my wrongful arrest last night." 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Sortor's arrest is very concerning.

"You PROVED what we've all been saying for years: you're CORRUPT and CONTROLLED by vioIent Antifa thugs who terrorize the streets," Sortor wrote on X. 

Just remember why Democrats protect Antifa.

 Leavitt hints at where Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought's next cuts are likely to be made (here are the latest cuts). 

And it begins. 


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/portland-police-arrest-journalist-not-antifa-prompting-top-trump-officials-investigate

Shocker: Soros-Backed Tides Foundation Funding Wikipedia

 X user DataRepublican, also known as Jennica Pounds, who leads DOGE-adjacent efforts in an open-source capacity, has delved deeper into the dark-money-funded NGO world. Her latest target: George Soros and one of the largest soft-power projects of the 1990s, called the Muskie Fellowship program. 

But the focus here is not the Muskie Fellowship program, but rather her question: "This is straight off the Federal Register. Now ask yourself why Wikipedia doesn't mention the Soros Foundation." 

She added, "And fun fact -- Soros had further grants for these graduates of the Muskie fellowship program. Hard to interpret this as something other than using our taxpayer funds to educate his minions." 

Responding to Pounds' thread, X user Leigh Marcotte suggested that Wikipedia's omission of the Soros Foundation from the Muskie Fellowship program entry may be linked to Soros-backed pass-through grants to the Wikimedia Foundation.

Marcotte explained:

Wikipedia may omit Soros from search results because Tides, an OSF pass-through, grants funds to the Wikimedia Foundation, which operates

Wikipedia and related projects like Wikimedia Commons and Wiktionary. Wikimedia provides infrastructure, funding, and support to keep Wikipedia free and accessible.

Per its 2023 Form 990, Tides Advocacy awarded $3,176,116 to Wikimedia Foundation for general support.

This may explain why Grok increasingly makes errors when fact-checking conservatives' posts on Soros funding

For context, the Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit organization that operates and supports Wikipedia and other projects. 

Marcotte's post was even read by Elon Musk, who replied, "Noted." 

Earlier this week, Muk revealed plans to launch "Grokipedia" as a move to counter the world's largest online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, which has been hijacked by left-wing activists who manipulate narratives and silence dissenting viewpoints. 

"We are building Grokipedia @xAI . Will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia. Frankly, it is a necessary step towards the xAI goal of understanding the Universe," Musk wrote on X.

The reliability of OpenAI's ChatGPT and even xAI's Grok comes into question given Wikipedia's designation of "reliable source"... 

And then there's this. 

Related:

The broader message is that the fight for narrative control continues. Wikipedia has received funding (as per the report above) from dark-money NGOs, which undermines credibility and, most importantly, raises questions about the reliability of chatbots that pull information from Wikipedia entries. This may help explain why Musk is preparing to launch a competing "Grokpedia." The pursuit of truth, or the effort to seize narrative control from the Deep State, marches on

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/why-wikipedia-may-omit-soros-details-tides-grants-funding-wikimedia-foundation

UnitedHealth shareholder wants board chair independent from CEO

 A UnitedHealth shareholder proposed on Friday that the healthcare group should adopt a policy to require an independent board chair, a role now held by CEO Stephen Hemsley.

The Accountability Board, a nonprofit advocacy group and UnitedHealth's shareholder, said the current structure would decrease the board's "checks and balances by consolidating power."

Hemsley took the CEO job after his predecessor Andrew Witty resigned abruptly in May. Hemsley served as the board chair since 2017.

"Now, a single person holds both roles — which is as far as it gets from the independent oversight shareholders so critically need," the proposal says.

Matt Prescott, president of the Accountability Board, declined to disclose its stake in UnitedHealth but said it has at least $25,000 in the company for the past year.

This comes as the largest U.S. health insurer is trying to regain the confidence of shareholders.

Once hailed as a reliable earnings performer, UnitedHealth missed Wall Street's earnings target for two straight quarters this year, and was forced to pull back its 2025 outlook in May due to soaring medical costs and shortfalls in its government-backed plans.

In the last two years, UnitedHealth has also dealt with a cyberattack at its technology unit that served as a major backbone in the U.S. healthcare system, the murder of its insurance unit chief in December, and a federal investigation into its government-backed health plans.

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/unitedhealth-shareholder-proposes-independent-board-203710665.html