Search This Blog

Sunday, May 3, 2026

Animal Farm Film A Hollywood Perversion Of Orwell's Anti-Communist Classic

 George Orwell's prognostications about the future of authoritarianism have proven consistently accurate.  They have only been limited by his inability to foresee the creation of certain technologies which make the future look even more bleak.  The reason his books, like 1984 and Animal Farm, are considered classics of literature is because they are timeless. 

Their warnings and messages still apply today and will probably apply centuries from now. 

Animal Farm, first published in 1945, is a tale specifically written as an allegory for the Bolshevik Revolution and the rise of Soviet Communism.  Despite the characters being talking animals, the themes are dark and disturbing.  It is a story about the naivety of the "underclass", the exploitation of the "have-nots" by communists seeking to use gullible people as weapons against their "imperialist" and capitalist enemies. 

It is a grotesque tragedy composed like a children's novel, which makes it all the more effective.  It destroys the notion of "equity" and exposes the truth:  There is no such thing as a socialist Utopia, there can only ever be socialist dystopia.  And to get it, leftists are happy to sacrifice you and everything you love.  Not only that, but they expect you to applaud them for it.

The message is made iconic in the book's famous phrase:  "All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others..."

This is the epitome of woke ideology and how progressives behave today.  It's no surprise that Hollywood is incapable of telling this story properly.  In order to do that, they would have to put their own warped beliefs under a microscope, and that's simply not going to happen.  

The new animated adaptation of Animal Farm is being billed as a kid-friendly foray into concepts of "authoritarianism"; but it perverts Orwell's message about communism and demonizes capitalism instead.  

Audiences across the board are not happy.  The movie is distributed by Angel Studios, which bills itself as a Christian and conservative leaning company.  However, the makers of the film (director Andy Serkis and The Imaginarium Studios) are entirely left wing.  Given the people involved, Angel Studios should have know what kind of disaster they would have on their hands.

Andy Serkis is a former member of the Socialist Workers Party, a Troskyist Group in England in the 1990s.  Though he is no longer involved, he still considers himself left wing, and his exit from political provocation was largely because of conflicts with his acting career.  Enlisting a hardcore socialist to direct Animal Farm feels like a deliberate middle finger to conservatives who see the story as a cautionary battle cry against leftist movements. 

The film was even released on May Day (International Workers Day), which is a communist holiday.

In developing the film as far back as 2013, Serkis (still riding the high of his successful role as "Gollum" in the Lord Of The Rings movies) admitted that he had no intention of sticking to the critique of communism.  Rather, he believed that if Orwell wrote Animal Farm today, he would obviously compose a takedown of capitalism

“First and foremost, we are not making a film about Communism and Stalinism because if Orwell was writing the story today, he would be talking about other relevant topics like globalisation and corporate greed...”

In other words, Andy Serkis, like most communists, wants to rewrite history in favor of his ideology. 

This is exactly what he did in the new Angel Studios film.  Many of the characters from the book are the same, and some of the plot points remain.  The animals revolt against the farmers and seek to build their Utopia of fairness.  But, the pigs (who represent the communist manipulators in the book) are not evil in the film.  Rather, they are corrupted into doing bad things by a new character - Ruthless billionaire Frieda Pilkington and her corporation.

Frieda is the typical evil rich white person common in leftist mythology.  Some critics have argued that the character looks strikingly similar to Elon Musk's mother, May Musk, and she even drives a vehicle that looks like a pink Cybertruck. 

Rather than the pigs being conniving and malicious from the beginning, Frieda corrupts them into evil with the promise of riches.  Her plan is to use the pigs as a means to get control of the farm.  In the end, the animals realize their mistake and their solution is yet another communist revolution. 

The message being, communism only goes wrong when evil capitalists influence the outcome.  Collectivist ideology is inherently good.  Leftists are not psychotic ideologues thirsting for power and control.  They are just led astray sometimes.   

There are numerous hatchet job films denigrating capitalism out of Hollywood.  There are few if any that explore the nightmares of communism and left-wing collectivism.  Orwell's Animal Farm is one of the few stories that captures the insidious nature of "equity" and suicidal empathy that permeate communist societies.  It is about the tools that communists use to lead the population astray, not about capitalism leading communists astray.  

Even worse is the marketing strategy of Angel Studios, which has tapped into the pockets of conservative and libertarian influencers (including Tucker Carlson) to sell the movie.  It is likely that most of these influencers never watched the film before they promoted it, and if they did, it might be time to question their motives. 

Critics and audiences alike have given Animal Farm a thunderous thumbs down.  Angel Studios is the same company that put Sound Of Freedom in theaters; a movie which was relentlessly (and suspiciously) attacked by the political left for putting a spotlight on child trafficking and pedophile rings.  It is unfortunate that they made placed this project in the hands of the same left wing community that tried to tear them down only a couple years ago.   

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/animal-farm-film-hollywood-perversion-orwells-anti-communist-classic

China Tries To Assert Dominance Over Canada After Carney Trade Deal

 Historically speaking, crawling to communists for help has never been a good idea; there's always a catch.  By extension, making trade deals with China and the CCP from a position of weakness usually ends with diplomatic concessions instead of mere economic concessions.  That is to say, the Chinese are less interested in economic benefits, and more interested in political submission. 

Canadians are about to speed run this lesson after Prime Minister Mark Carney's "new strategic partnership" formed with China early this year.   The announcement has been heralded as a pragmatic reset in Canada-China relations after years of tensions, aimed at diversifying Canada’s trade amid U.S. tariffs under Trump.  The goals of the deal include increased bilateral trade, agricultural agreements, currency swaps and energy exports. 

The problem is, Carney also wants Canada to maintain its relationship with Taiwan, which the CCP views as a violation of their "One China" policy.  Not surprisingly, China is already using their newfound economic leverage to pressure Canada to submit to their demands on Taiwan.

Chinese Ambassador to Canada, Wang Di, has warned that the new strategic partnership between Canada and China could be damaged if Canada continues sending parliamentarians (MPs and senators) to Taiwan, or if they continue transiting warships through the Taiwan Strait. 

Wang emphasized the One China principle, stating there is "only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory." He described Taiwan as a core interest and political foundation for bilateral relations, warning that official engagements by Canadian parliamentarians with Taiwanese officials would be "hurtful."

Canadian MPs and senators have long visited Taiwan, including numerous meetings with the president and foreign minister.  But, this year their trips to Taiwan have been cut short, with Canada showing a quiet willingness to "de-conflict" high-profile visits when they overlap with China diplomacy. 

Taiwan's envoy to Ottawa warned that Canada's burgeoning attachment to China could put them in a vulnerable position and lead to "trade weaponization" by the CCP. 

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has led his country into economic chaos as one of the few leaders unwilling to negotiate a basic trade deal with the Trump Administration.  He should have been the first to make a deal, given that around 75% of Canada's export economy relies on US markets and there is no viable alternative that will bring anywhere close to the same trade revenues.

Canada's housing market is currently in shambles with prices still skyrocketing.  Jobs losses are climbing.  Factories are shutting down.  Food prices are inflating.    

It's a matter of simple math and basic geography:  The US is the largest consumer market by far with 30% of total global buying power.  China is around 12% of the global total and their consumer spending is far less liquid (and spread out over a much larger population).  Furthermore, shipping goods 6000 miles to China is a lot more expensive and inefficient than shipping goods right across the border to the US.  It's not complicated - making a deal with the US is the superior option. 

However, Carney and his globalist ilk are not interested in common sense trade policies, they are engaged in an ideological war with the Trump Administration.  This is about an increasingly "woke" and socialist Canadian regime vs an increasingly nationalist and anti-woke US government.   

Carney has consistently painted the situation between the US and Canada as a war, and he has made it clear he intends to "win".  This means cutting deals with traditional enemies like China; not because it makes sense financially, but because it's a way to spite Trump and conservatives in America. 

In the end, it is a foolish plan which will only end up costing Canadians billions in export revenues and possibly enslave them to eastern geopolitical interests; further inflaming tensions with the US.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/china-tries-assert-dominance-over-canada-after-carney-trade-deal

Projectiles hit tanker north of UAE

 The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said it received a report of "unknown projectiles" striking a tanker 78 nautical miles north of Fujairah, United Arab Emirates.

"All crew reported safe. No environmental impact reported," the UKMTO said in its brief notice.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Projectiles-hit-tanker-north-of-UAE/66205676

Proof NYC’s education leaders put kids last

The sad, short tale of what would’ve been an AI-focused high school is all-too-emblematic of why public education keeps getting worse in New York City.

Chancellor Kamar Samuels pulled the plug at the first hint of woke opposition, as race-obsessed activists fumed that opening Next Generation Technology HS would “exacerbate existing disparities” among city students.

Meaning: Selective admissions to a cutting-edge computer-science-focused school would be a boon to the kids who were prepared to do the academic work — and so expose how badly so many K-8 public schools fail low-income black and Hispanic families.

NextGen had attracted a qualified applicant pool of 1,000 students, with 39% Hispanic, 21% black, 20% Asian and 17% white — but critics were sure the final screen would “disadvantage” the non-white, non-Asian ones.

Opponents included Greg Faulkner, who chairs the Panel for Education Policy, who claimed to back the idea “of a school dedicated to advanced technology” and to appreciate “the academic rigor of this model” — but opposed the selective admissions that are transparently necessary to making such school work.

And so no teens get to attend a challenging school, partnered with Carnegie Mellon University and Google and offering a strong math and science curriculum.

Then again, Samuels is an enemy of the Gifted & Talented programs in lower grades that would prepare students for such challenges: As a superintendent on the Upper West Side, he worked to dismantle G&T in the name of “equity.”

This is the chancellor hand-picked by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a Bronx Science grad who evidently thinks future generations shouldn’t have as much opportunity as he grew up with.

This nonsense mainly serves to cover the system’s failure to serve the very children Mamdani, Samuels and Faulkner pretend to care about.

No wonder minority families are fleeing Department of Education outlets for public charter schools whose rigorous instruction has seen poor black and Hispanic kids greatly outperform their DOE-“served” peers on every academic assessment.

https://nypost.com/2026/05/03/opinion/proof-nycs-education-leaders-put-kids-last/

Mamdani’s new scam: Charge NYC taxpayers to hire his rent-a-mobs

 New Yorkers, you’ve been slacking — so the mayor wants to organize you.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani isn’t happy that only 400 people showed up to last year’s Rent Guidelines Board hearings.

In response, last Wednesday, he launched Organize NYC, a supposed volunteer effort to have New Yorkers participate in local government.

Taken straight from the Democratic Socialists of America’s community-organizing playbook, Mamdani is calling it “a long-term initiative to bring mass public participation into the work of governing.”

First stop: the RGB. The body with power to set rent adjustments for the city’s 1 million rent-stabilized units will hold four public hearings in June before voting on increases at its June 25 meeting.

Mamdani was elected on the dishonest promise to “immediately” freeze the rent on stabilized tenants for four years.

Since taking office, however, he has been forced to recognize what the law has made clear from the start: He cannot set rents himself, and overt interference with the independent RGB could expose a rent freeze to a legal challenge.

So Mamdani has found another way.

His Office of Mass Engagement will soon recruit so-called volunteers to fan out across selected neighborhoods and encourage rent-stabilized tenants to attend the hearings.

In other words, City Hall is mobilizing the constituency most likely to support the mayor’s preferred outcome while insisting it is merely promoting civic participation.

He’s paying lip service to the RGB’s independence while directing a government office to organize a campaign ensuring the board “answers to the people it serves” — an ominous phrase that gives away Organize NYC’s actual purpose.

The mayor insists the effort aims to educate, not advocate. According to Mass Engagement Commissioner and DSA veteran Tascha Van Auken, the volunteers are “not advocating for any specific outcome or position.”

Don’t be fooled. Organize NYC is a thinly veiled, taxpayer-funded effort to embed campaign-style political organizing inside city government, dress it up as civic virtue and deliver Mamdani’s campaign promise under a veneer of official neutrality.

It raises serious policy, legal and ethical questions. Mamdani has not explained how he will fund Organize NYC or how much it will cost.

He claims the city faces a budget crisis of historic proportions, yet he has already allocated $2 million to pay the salaries of the organizers in the Mass Engagement office. Now he’s found the money to organize thousands of supposed volunteers.

Rule §1-13 of the Conflicts of Interest Board prohibits public servants from using city “letterhead, title, personnel, equipment, resources, supplies, or technology assets” for any “non-City purpose.”

It isn’t apparent that using public resources to advance Mamdani’s campaign promise qualifies as a “city purpose.”

The mayor will claim that it’s perfectly appropriate to use a branch of his office to promote New Yorkers’ participation in public affairs.

If Organize NYC were truly a neutral civic-participation effort, City Hall would have a general plan to increase attendance at City Council meetings, rezoning and procurement hearings, and the countless boards and authorities that hold public sessions across New York.

But the Mass Engagement Office has no companion plan to increase attendance at any of those.

Nor is it likely the campaign will try terribly hard to encourage landlords and their supporters to show up at the RGB meetings. 

Its promotional drive is directed solely at the body that controls the fate of the mayor’s most cherished campaign promise.

If successful in obtaining a rent freeze, Organize NYC would violate the fundamental legal principle that government may not do indirectly what it is forbidden to do directly.

A group ostensibly created to promote democratic participation would, ironically, erode the rule of law.

Once City Hall has built a taxpayer-funded organizing arm for one campaign promise, Mamdani can redeploy it for the next.

MTA Boss Janno Lieber may find Organize NYC at the door of his next meeting on bus fares.

After all, the Office of Mass Engagement openly describes its function as “bringing the people-powered movement that elected Mayor Mamdani to the work of governance.”

And Organize NYC has made its mission to “build lasting power for working-class New Yorkers that outlives any one administration.”

New York has no shortage of civil society capable of telling people about public hearings: tenant and landlord groups, civic and neighborhood associations, legal-services organizations, unions, political organizations and others.

Each of these private groups is one voice among many in the democratic process.

By contrast, any event featuring Organize NYC will be understood to carry the weight and approval of City Hall, putting the government’s thumb on the scale of what should be open and free deliberations.

Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to bankroll the mayor’s political pressure campaigns.

John Ketcham, an attorney, is director of cities and a legal policy fellow at Manhattan Institute, where Christian Browne, also an attorney, is an adjunct fellow.  

https://nypost.com/2026/05/03/opinion/mayor-mamdanis-new-scam-charge-nyc-taxpayers-to-hire-his-rent-a-mobs/

NYC hospital mob was defending illegal migrant with alleged violent, drug past

 The anti-ICE mob violently protesting outside a Brooklyn hospital Saturday was rallying in defense of an illegal migrant previously arrested for assault and drug possession, officials told The Post on Sunday.

Chidozie Wilson Okeke of Nigeria entered the US on a tourist visa Aug. 27, 2023, and was supposed to pack up and go back home Feb. 26, 2024 — but instead illegally stayed, a rep for the US Department of Homeland Security told The Post.

Okeke, who was arrested at some point for assault and criminal drug possession, landed on the radar of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, who tracked him down Saturday.

Federal agents stand over Chidozie WIlson Okeke, an illegal Nigerian migrant with two busts under his belt.Dakota Santiago/FNTV

“During his arrest, Okeke refused to comply with officers’ lawful commands to exit the vehicle and weaponized his vehicle to attempt to hit ICE officers,” the DHS representative said. “Okeke became physically combative, attempting to punch and elbow ICE officers.

“Our officers followed their training and used the minimum amount of force necessary to make the arrest.”

Okeke claimed he needed medical attention, so the agents brought him to Wyckoff Heights Medical Center in Bushwick to be checked out, DHS said.

There, the illegal migrant refused to comply with staff, “throwing himself to the floor and screaming,” the agency said. He was eventually medically cleared to leave the hospital.

An anti-ICE mob storms the area around Wyckoff Heights Medical Center to OKeke’s detainment.Dakota Santiago/FNTV

Anti-ICE protesters meanwhile somehow got wind that Okeke was in ICE custody at the hospital, with a mob of about 200 showing up there to try to stop the agents from leaving with Okeke.

The NYPD was called to the scene shortly before 10:30 p.m. to restore order and found the rowdy crowd blocking hospital exits and wreaking havoc in the neighborhood — prompting caught-on-video clashes between the cops and the crowd.

Police arrested nine demonstrators as ICE struggled to get Okeke into an SUV and whisk him off.

Police said nine protesters were arrested before Okeke was taken away by ICE.Dakota Santiago/FNTV

“The protesters damaged several ICE vehicles and assaulted ICE officers, resulting in minor injuries to the officers,” the DHS representative said. “Assaulting law enforcement is a felony and crime.”

The protesters arrested included out-of-state agitators from as far off as Wisconsin and New Hampshire.

The mob finally dispersed around 2:45 a.m. Sunday after Okeke was taken away.

“If the NYPD wasn’t there to keep the peace, God knows what these ICE agents would have done,” a law-enforcement source said Sunday.

https://nypost.com/2026/05/03/us-news/nyc-hospital-mob-was-defending-illegal-migrant-with-alleged-violent-drug-past/

'Iranian MP warns US escort plan in Hormuz would breach ceasefire'

 

An Iranian lawmaker warned that any US move to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz would be treated as a violation of the ceasefire, reacting to Donald Trump’s announced plan.

Ebrahim Azizi, a member of parliament’s national security commission, said “any intervention by the Americans in the new maritime order of the Strait of Hormuz will be considered a breach of the ceasefire.”

“The Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf are not a place for rhetoric,” he added in a post on X.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202604294038