Search This Blog

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

GARDP, Eisai, Takeda partner to search for new antibiotics


– First multi-actor partnership tests chemical compounds for antibacterial activity
The Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership (GARDP), Eisai Co., Ltd. (TSE: 4523) (‘Eisai’) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (TSE: 4502)(‘Takeda’) have signed an agreement for GARDP to access and screen components of Eisai and Takeda’s chemical libraries. Both libraries will be tested by the Institut Pasteur Korea in the hope of discovering novel compounds with antibacterial activity. This multi-partner agreement supports GARDP’s efforts to tackle serious bacterial infections by developing antibiotics while endeavouring to ensure their sustainable access.
With few antibiotics in development, antimicrobial resistance is a major and rapidly growing global public health concern. Around 700,000 people die of drug-resistant infections every year.1 Serious bacterial infections, and in particular Gram-negative bacterial infections, have been identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global public health priority.
The compounds that will be screened have emerged from Eisai and Takeda’s latest medicinal chemistry efforts and have never been screened for antibacterial activity. They will be tested against bacteria identified as a critical priority for research and development of new antibiotics in WHO’s global priority pathogen list.2 Through this screening, GARDP seeks to identify novel compounds suitable for further optimization and development.
‘GARDP is very excited about this partnership. Not only can partnerships like this accelerate the discovery of new antibiotics, they can also support the pharmaceutical sector in staying engaged in antibiotic R&D,’ said Dr. Seamus O’Brien, Research and Development Director at GARDP. ‘Overcoming antibacterial resistance is key to achieve universal health coverage. GARDP’s approach allows us to develop a drug from early exploratory to preclinical and clinical studies all the way to patients.’
‘Eisai strongly identifies with GARDP’s efforts to discover novel antibiotics to treat drug-resistant bacterial infections which have become a threat to human beings and are pleased to provide our compound library for screening. We sincerely hope new medicines will be discovered through this partnership to realize a world in which lives are no longer lost to drug-resistant bacteria,’ said Dr. Kappei Tsukahara, Senior Group Officer, Head of Human Health Care Data Creation Center, Head of Tsukuba Research Laboratories at Eisai.
‘Takeda is delighted to contribute to this creative partnership and extend our commitment to promoting the discovery of novel treatments to treat life-threatening antibiotic resistance,’ said Dr. Ceri Davies, Head of the Neuroscience Drug Discovery Unit at Takeda.
Dr. Wangshick Ryu, CEO of the Institut Pasteur Korea said ‘We are honoured to collaborate with GARDP on a global project of great importance to find a solution for antibiotic resistance. The world needs global cooperative action to prevent the post-antibiotic era. This work, instigated by GARDP, is an active response to this urgent global demand that connects Institut Pasteur Korea’s resources with the technology of global pharmaceutical companies. We believe that together we can achieve much more.’

Improved treatment of anxiety disorders


Traumatic experiences can become deeply entrenched in a person’s memory. How can fears following a traumatic event be reduced in the long term and prevented from becoming a permanent stress-related disorder? Researchers at the Mainz University Medical Center have recently shed new light on these questions. The key to their approach lies in firmly anchoring new, positive experiences in the person’s memory. As in classical treatment, traumatized patients would first have to be exposed to their fear-inducing stimuli to learn that these stimuli are often harmless. This experience would then be made durable using a safe and simple drug treatment. The researchers have been analyzing more closely the mental processes that underlie the resulting positive memory formation processes. Their findings, now published in Nature Communications, could help improve the treatment of anxiety-related problems and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and aid in the development of appropriate preventive measures.
The human brain is continually changing and can be (re)shaped by experiences — both good and bad. This is the basic premise underlying resilience research and the therapies used to treat phobias and anxiety disorders. But how do some people manage to reduce their fear, or even make use of it and turn it into new, positive experiences when confronted with a situation that would previously have terrified them? And why does this mechanism called fear extinction fail to work for other people over the long term? How does an individual’s brain form and stabilize long-term memories and what is the role played by factors such as spontaneous neural consolidation processes, which occur after a new, positive experience is learned? These are the questions at the heart of the work carried out by Professor Raffael Kalisch and Dr. Anna M.V. Gerlicher together with researchers of the German Resilience Center (DRZ) and the Collaborative Research Center 1193 “Neurobiology of resilience to stress-induced mental dysfunction: from understanding mechanisms to promoting prevention” at the Mainz University Medical Center.
“We already have a pretty good understanding of the neural processes that are relevant to learning that a fear-inducing stimulus no longer presents a threat. Recent studies have shown, however, that it is very important to be able to clearly remember these learning experiences. This is the only way to avoid repeatedly falling prey to unnecessary fear responses and to thus become resilient to developing a post-traumatic stress disorder,” explained Dr. Anna Gerlicher, first author of the study paper. “Therefore, we focused fully on the question of how, after such an extinction learning process, the learned experience can be consolidated in our memory.”
The team led by DRZ research group leader Professor Raffael Kalisch discovered that the brains of their test subjects exhibited specific activation patterns during an extinction learning experience, which spontaneously reappeared in a rest phase after the learning phase. The more frequently these spontaneous reactivations occurred, the better the subjects were able to recall their positive experience on a subsequent test day and the less marked were their fear responses to stimuli that would otherwise have triggered the fear response.
They also discovered that the activity patterns relevant to the memories were dependent on the neurotransmitter dopamine, known as the reward hormone. “A particularly fascinating aspect for us was that by administering a commercially available drug that intervenes in cerebral biochemistry and causes an increase in the brain’s dopamine levels after extinction learning, we were able to increase the number of reactivations so that subsequent fear responses were reduced to the same extent. In essence, we discovered that fear extinction memories can be relatively easily reinforced, at least in the laboratory, and in fact without any further practice or memory training,” added Kalisch.
The researchers see their findings as offering potential for gaining new insights into the fundamental mechanisms of memory formation and for developing possible new ways to improve the prevention and treatment of post-traumatic stress.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet MainzNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. A. M. V. Gerlicher, O. Tüscher, R. Kalisch. Dopamine-dependent prefrontal reactivations explain long-term benefit of fear extinctionNature Communications, 2018; 9 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06785-y

Unique immune cell likely drives chronic inflammation


For the first time, researchers have identified that an immune cell subset called gamma delta T cells that may be causing and/or perpetuating the systemic inflammation found in normal aging in the general geriatric population and in HIV-infected people who are responding well to drugs (anti-retrovirals).
Even with effective viral control, HIV-infected individuals are at a higher risk for morbidities associated with older age than the general population. Unfortunately, the cell subsets driving inflammation in HIV infection and with normal aging are not yet understood. Also, whether antiretroviral therapy (ART) suppressed HIV infection causes premature induction of the inflammatory events found in uninfected elderly or if a novel inflammatory network ensues when HIV and older age co-exist is unclear.
To understand the cellular network that drives the onset and progression of age-associated morbidities in both ART-suppressed HIV and healthy aging, researchers from Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) conducted a study that measured many markers on the surface of immune cells in the blood of people either with or without HIV (uninfected controls) that were sub-divided into two groups: younger (less than 35 years) and older (over 50 years) and compared that data with levels of inflammatory proteins in their plasma. This unique group of patients was recruited for the study by coauthor Nina Lin, MD, assistant professor of medicine at BUSM and an infectious disease specialist at Boston Medical Center.
Researchers found a marker on these gamma delta T cells, called TIGIT, that tracked significantly with plasma inflammatory markers in both the HIV+ and uninfected subject groups, and therefore could be targeted to potentially stop this “inflamm-aging” found in both HIV+ people and the general geriatric population.
“Our study indicates that there’s a previously uninvestigated cell subset new player in the immune landscape that could be driving widespread illnesses and with targeted gamma delta therapeutics maybe there may be a chance of reducing onset, symptoms, and/or severity of inflammation-related diseases,” explained corresponding author Jennifer Snyder-Cappione, PhD, assistant professor of microbiology and director, Flow Cytometry Core Facility at BUSM.
More than 50 percent of the HIV-infected population in the U.S. is older than 50 years and the world’s geriatric over the ages of 65 and 80 is predicted to double and nearly quadruple, respectively, by 2050. “Revealing and therapeutically targeting the cell populations and precise immune networks that drive “inflamm-aging” both with and without HIV infection is a preeminent global health priority.”
The researchers, which include first author Anna Belkinia, PhD, assistant professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at BUSM, hope their study will spur new investigation and clinical trials targeting gamma delta T cell subsets to control unchecked inflammation and thereby reduce the onset and progression of many chronic diseases.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Boston University School of MedicineNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Anna C. Belkina, Alina Starchenko, Katherine A. Drake, Elizabeth A. Proctor, Riley M. F. Pihl, Alex Olson, Douglas A. Lauffenburger, Nina Lin, Jennifer E. Snyder-Cappione. Multivariate Computational Analysis of Gamma Delta T Cell Inhibitory Receptor Signatures Reveals the Divergence of Healthy and ART-Suppressed HIV AgingFrontiers in Immunology, 2018; 9 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02783

Guidelines for the therapeutic use of melatonin


Sixty years after melatonin was isolated and with more than 23,000 published studies showing the many functions of this hormone secreted by the pineal gland, guidelines should be discussed and established for its therapeutic use.
This is the view expressed by José Cipolla Neto, Full Professor at the University of São Paulo’s Biomedical Science Institute (ICB-USP), and Fernanda Gaspar do Amaral, a professor at the Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), both in Brazil, in an article published in the journal Endocrine Reviews.
Cipolla Neto is the principal investigator for a project supported by São Paulo Research Foundation — FAPESP on the role of melatonin in energy metabolism regulation.
“Melatonin not only adapts the organism to nocturnal rest but also prepares it metabolically for the next day, when it will need to be sufficiently sensitive to absorb food, for example,” he said. The body produces melatonin only at night.
“If the nocturnal production of melatonin is blocked by light during the night, especially by the blue light from smartphones, this can contribute to diseases, such as sleep disorders and hypertension, and metabolic disturbances, including obesity and diabetes. This potentially pathogenic situation is due not only to insufficient melatonin production but also to one of its more immediate consequences, which is a condition known as chronodisruption, a temporal disorganization of the circadian rhythm of biological functions,” Cipolla Neto told.
Present in almost all living beings, from bacteria to humans, melatonin has been the focus of many clinical studies. In the last five years alone, more than 4,000 studies using melatonin have been published. Almost 200 of those were randomized clinical trials.
Between 1996 and July 2017, for example, 195 systematic reviews were published on the effects of the clinical use of melatonin, among which 96 addressed the use of melatonin to treat psychiatric diseases and neurological disturbances, including sleep disorders, while 43 focused on the association between melatonin and cancer.
Patent applications relating to therapeutic uses of melatonin and analogs filed worldwide between 2012 and September 2014 focused predominantly on the central nervous system — including sleep disorders, the disruption of the circadian cycle and neuroprotection — as well as cancer and immunological issues.
In spite of the impressive amount of data on melatonin and the pineal gland, researchers and clinicians lack a systematic standard theoretical framework of analysis that could assist in the appropriate interpretation of the data obtained and the development of an adequate understanding of the role played by melatonin in human physiology and pathophysiology, according to the authors of the article, who say their intention is “to propose a framework of analysis that would help researchers and health professionals to analyze, understand and interpret the effects of melatonin and its putative role in several pathologies.”
Individual variation
Characterized chemically in 1959, melatonin — which derives from tryptophan, an essential amino acid found in proteins — is highly efficient at eliminating free radicals and has remarkable antioxidant properties. It interacts directly with free radicals and stimulates antioxidant enzymes in different tissues.
This role has long been proposed as melatonin’s primary function; however, in recent years, researchers have discovered that owing to its special properties, it is an exceptionally important molecule that acts through several mechanisms at almost all physiological levels. These include all components of the cardiovascular, reproductive, immune, respiratory and endocrine systems as well as energy metabolism, according to the authors.
“Melatonin’s modes of action and integrative role amplify and diversify its functional activities, particularly in the time domain, enabling the organism’s physiology to deal with challenges present while it’s being secreted by the pineal gland, and at the same time preparing the organism for future events. Similarly, melatonin synchronizes our organism’s temporal order both daily and on the seasonal time scale,” Cipolla Neto said.
“Consequently, all these particular modes of action should always be taken into consideration in both laboratory experiments [in cells] and animals, and especially in clinical studies and investigations into the use of melatonin as a treatment. In this case, above all, it should be kept in mind that melatonin’s effects depend not just on the route of administration and concentration but also on the time of administration, among other factors.”
In addition, it is important to consider that the profile and onset of melatonin production vary from person to person. Early birds (people who wake early) start their daily melatonin production before night owls (people who stay up late), and people who sleep for longer periods of time produce melatonin over a longer time than those who sleep for shorter periods.
Furthermore, according to the researchers, it should be kept in mind that a given dose of melatonin may result in different plasma levels in different patients owing to individual differences in absorbing, distributing, metabolizing and eliminating melatonin. These differences are associated with age, clinical condition, the existence of pathologies, and the functional integrity of physiological systems such as the gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidneys.
If these substantial differences are not adequately taken into account, they may impact clinical efficacy, the authors state, adding that “a proper chronic melatonin hormonal replacement therapy is only achieved when dosage and formulation are carefully chosen and individually tailored and controlled to accomplish the desired clinical effect.”
The first and most important guideline for the clinical use of melatonin proposed by the authors is to determine the duration of the daily signal and the start of production in each patient and then to prescribe melatonin according to this reference point in time, called the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO).
This specific point on the daily melatonin production curve is an important temporal reference for the proper administration of the hormone to patients. Depending on the time at which it is administered — always using the DLMO as a guide — exogenous melatonin may advance, delay or have no effect on the timing of endogenous circadian rhythms.
Because the procedure to determine DLMO is typically not feasible in everyday clinical practice, a more practical approach is to take the time at which the patient usually goes to sleep at night as a reference for the timing of melatonin administration.
According to the authors, most oral formulations require approximately 45 minutes to an hour to become bioavailable, so a dose should be taken about an hour before the usual reported bedtime. Given that melatonin is a powerful timer of the organism’s physiology, it should be taken strictly at the same time every day.
Dose is another key point to be discussed. There is no consensus in the literature on this matter. On average, plasma levels in young people who take 0.1-0.3 milligrams will reach 100-200 picograms per milliliter (pg/ml), equivalent to the expected normal physiological range, while 1 gram will probably result in plasma levels of 500-600 pg/ml, which is much higher than the physiological range.
In their concluding summary, the authors note that the following precautions should be taken into consideration in melatonin therapy: chronic administration should be restricted to nighttime, the time should be carefully chosen according to the desired effect, and the dose and formulation should be individually adapted to build a blood melatonin profile that mimics the physiological ideal, ending by early morning.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. José Cipolla-Neto, Fernanda Gaspar do Amaral. MELATONIN AS A HORMONE: NEW PHYSIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL INSIGHTSEndocrine Reviews, 2018; DOI: 10.1210/er.2018-00084

Drug cocktail turns off the juice to cancer cells


A widely used diabetes medication combined with an antihypertensive drug specifically inhibits tumor growth — this was discovered by researchers from the University of Basel’s Biozentrum two years ago. In a follow-up study, recently published in Cell Reports, the scientists report that this drug cocktail induces cancer cell death by switching off their energy supply.
The widely used anti-diabetes drug metformin not only reduces blood sugar but also has an anti-cancer effect. However, the metformin dose commonly used in the treatment of diabetes is too low to inhibit cancer growth. The previous study of Prof. Hall’s group at the University of Basel’s Biozentrum revealed that the antihypertensive drug syrosingopine enhances metformin’s anti-cancer efficacy.
In the follow-up study, jointly performed at the Biozentrum and Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, the scientists shed light on this phenomenon: The combination of the two drugs blocks a critical step in energy production thus leading to an energy shortage, which finally drives cancer cells to “suicide.”
Drug cocktail cripples sophisticated machinery
Cancer cells have high energy demands due to their increased metabolic needs and rapid growth. A limiting factor in meeting this demand is the molecule NAD+, which is key for the conversion of nutrients into energy. “In order to keep the energy-generating machinery running, NAD+ must be continuously generated from NADH,” explains Don Benjamin, first author of the study. “Interestingly, both metformin and syrosingopine prevent the regeneration of NAD+, but in two different ways.”
Taking a closer look at the mode of action
Many tumor cells shift their metabolism toward glycolysis, which means that they generate energy mainly via the breakdown of glucose to lactate. Since the accumulation of lactate leads to a blockade of the glycolytic pathway, cancer cells eliminate lactate by exporting it from the cell via specific transporters. “We have now discovered that syrosingopine efficiently blocks the two most important lactate transporters and thus, inhibits lactate export,” says Benjamin. “High intracellular lactate concentrations, in turn, prevent NADH from being recycled into NAD+.”
Lethal combination
Because the anti-diabetes drug metformin blocks the second of the two cellular pathways for NAD+ regeneration, combined metformin-syrosingopine treatment results in complete loss of the cell’s NAD+ recycling capacity. The depletion of NAD+ in turn leads to cell death, as the cancer cells are no longer able to produce sufficient energy. Thus, pharmacological inhibition of lactate transporters by syrosingopine or other similarly acting drugs can increase the anti-cancer efficacy of metformin and may prove a promising approach to fighting cancer.
The former Basel-based company Ciba originally developed syrosingopine for the treatment of hypertension in 1958. The identification of syrosingopine as a dual inhibitor of the two main lactate transporters is an important discovery, as currently there is no pharmacological inhibitor available for one of these two transporters (MCT4). The potential application of syrosingopine in cancer therapy could trigger a second career for this old drug.
Story Source:
Materials provided by University of BaselNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Don Benjamin, Dimitri Robay, Sravanth K. Hindupur, Jens Pohlmann, Marco Colombi, Mahmoud Y. El-Shemerly, Sauveur-Michel Maira, Christoph Moroni, Heidi A. Lane, Michael N. Hall. Dual Inhibition of the Lactate Transporters MCT1 and MCT4 Is Synthetic Lethal with Metformin due to NAD Depletion in Cancer CellsCell Reports, 2018; 25 (11): 3047 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.043

Boston Scientific wins $35M patent fight against Edwards


https://thefly.com/landingPageNews.php?id=2835695

Medifast (MED) Raises Quarterly Dividend 56.3% to $0.75; 2.2% Yield


Medifast (NYSE: MED) declared a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share, or $3 annualized. This is a 56.3% increase from the prior dividend of $0.48.
The dividend will be payable on February 7, 2019, to stockholders of record on December 21, 2018, with an ex-dividend date of December 20, 2018.
The annual yield on the dividend is 2.2 percent.
“This increase reflects our confidence in the business as well our commitment to deliver attractive total stockholder returns,” said Dan Chard, Chief Executive Officer of Medifast.