Search This Blog

Monday, July 15, 2019

U.S. judge slashes Roundup jury award to $25.3 million; Bayer still plans to appeal

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco said evidence against the former Monsanto Co, which Bayer bought last year, supported the $5.27 million in compensatory damages that a jury awarded Edwin Hardeman. He also said the jury acted reasonably in awarding punitive damages.
Chhabria nonetheless reduced punitive damages to $20 million from $75 million, saying that while Monsanto “deserves to be punished” the higher award was “constitutionally impermissible” because it was nearly 15 times the compensatory damages award.
“Monsanto’s conduct, while reprehensible, does not warrant a ratio of that magnitude, particularly in the absence of evidence showing intentional concealment of a known or obvious safety risk,” Chhabria wrote.
Hardeman said he used Roundup for many years starting in the 1980s to treat poison oak and weeds on his property.
He was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 2014, but is now in remission.
Hardeman is one of more than 13,400 plaintiffs who have sued Bayer and Monsanto over Roundup, saying the herbicide’s active ingredient, glyphosate, is unsafe. His case was considered a bellwether for hundreds of similar cases before Chhabria.
In a statement, Bayer called Chhabria’s decision “a step in the right direction,” but said it still plans to appeal.
Bayer said the verdict and damages award “conflict with both the weight of the extensive science that supports the safety of Roundup, and the conclusions of leading health regulators in the U.S. and around the world that glyphosate is not carcinogenic.”
It is unclear whether Hardeman will appeal the reduced damages award. U.S. Supreme Court precedents limit the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages to 9 to 1.
“We are pleased that the judge denied Monsanto’s motion to throw out the verdict, and recognized that Monsanto deserved to be punished,” Jennifer Moore, a lawyer for Hardeman, said in an interview. “We disagree with any reduction in the jury verdict.”
Bayer paid $63 billion for Monsanto.
The case is In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 16-md-02741. The Hardeman case is Hardeman v Monsanto Co in the same court, No. 16-00525.

Migraine-Treating Headset Gets European Approval

Neurolief has recently received European approval for their non-invasive, digital migraine treatment. The device, Relivion, is a wearable headset that delivers therapeutic neurostimulation that was previously only available through implanted devices. This innovative system allows consumers to combat the symptoms of migraine at home for a much lower cost than the surgical implant. After receiving the CE mark, Neurolief can now market, distribute, and sell their solution over the counter in both the European Union and countries that participate with Agreements on Mutual Recognition of Conformity Assessment.
“This CE mark for the Relivion system marks a vital step in providing patients with alternative, non-drug technology-driven treatments,” said Shmuel Shany, co-founder and CEO, Neurolief. “We designed the Relivion to be a self-administered, safe and attainable alternative to high-cost and high-risk surgical implants, accelerating migraine relief for migraine sufferers in a non-invasive manner. We believe the Relivion will be instrumental in giving patients more rapid relief, increased productivity, and the ability to get back to their lives.”
The Relivion headset is designed for comfort, with adjustable size features for each user’s head. Stimulation is delivered simultaneously to six branches of the trigeminal and occipital nerves using three adaptive channels. This technology was granted the CE mark based on a successful clinical trial, in which Relivion was tested in treating migraines. 76% of the participants were relieved of their headache symptoms after one treatment and none displayed serious side effects.
These patients began using Relivion at the beginning of their migraine episode and wore the device for one hour. The device was also found to be superior to pharmaceutical intervention without presenting any side effects, toxicity, or limitation on treatment quantity. The full study was presented at the American Headache Society’s 61st Annual Scientific Meeting on Saturday, July 13, 2019 in Philadelphia.
migraine

“I believe that the Relivion device from Neurolief has great potential to improve acute migraine therapy,” said Alan Rapoport, M.D., clinical professor of neurology at The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and former president of the International Headache Society. “Not only is it designed to stimulate both the trigeminal and occipital nerves simultaneously to help alleviate migraine without having to worry about side effects from medications, but it does so via a comfortable headset that is different from anything available today. These attributes combine to offer a therapy that migraine sufferers can feel good about using – and in turn receive consistent treatment to help them live a more disability-free, productive, fulfilling life.”
The Relivion device is connected to the e-Relief smartphone app as well, which connects the patients’ information to the cloud database. In the cloud, each user’s data is gathered and analyzed via artificial intelligence (AI), allowing for treatments to be optimized to the individual patient. This learning system continues to improve customized treatments over time, offering countless treatment combinations using its three channels and targeting six nerve branches.
With 80% of migraine sufferers currently unhappy with existing treatment options, Relivion has the potential to help countless sufferers. Over 900 million people worldwide suffer from migraine, and by offering an affordable, non-invasive solution, Neurolief may be taking a huge step in providing migraine care. The company also claims that their neuromodulation device can serve as therapy to those with other neurological and psychiatric disorders, including depressionADHD, and insomnia. The anti-depressant therapy of Relivion was evaluated in an open-label clinical study, in which 90% of patients showed improvements in their depression scores and 37% reached remission.

Neurolief also has plans to expand upon Relivion’s current AI capabilities and therapeutic capabilities.
“Future generations of Neurolief’s innovative technology will include embedded AI and machine learning algorithms, which will provide powerful capabilities to analyze the data collected from each user and from multiple users along with accurate migraine prediction,” says Amit Dar, Neurolief’s co-founder and chief technology officer. “This will integrate in a seamless fashion to enable updates of the closed-loop personalized brain neuromodulation treatment that improves over time, providing a tailored, precise treatment for each patient. Furthermore, Neurolief is advancing toward implementation of its groundbreaking technology for additional neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders with great unmet need such as major depression.”
View image on Twitter
MESH™ Incubator at Massachusetts General Hospital@meshincubator
Relivion Headset for Migraines Cleared in Europe: Neurolief, an Israeli company, has won European regulatory clearance (CE Mark) for its Relivion system to treat migraines. Intended as an over-the-counter product, the non-invasive… http://dlvr.it/R8JlTm  @medgadget @medtech

Medical Properties invests $1.75B in 24 hospital facilities

Medical Properties Trust (NYSE:MPWenters agreements with two new operators and completes an agreement with a third new operator to invest ~$1.75B in a total of 24 hospital facilities.
The agreements include investments in:
14 acute care hospitals and two behavioral health hospital facilities operated by Prospect Medical Holdings for $1.55B;
Seven community hospitals operated by Saint Luke’s Health System for $145M; and
One acute care hospital operated by Halsen Healthcare for $55M.
Sees deals immediately accretive; boosts run-rate guidance for NFFO to $1.54-$1.58 per share.
Reduces exposure to MPT’s largest tenant, Steward Healthcare, to 30.3% from 39.5% as of Dec. 31, 2018, and its two largest tenants combined to 42.6%, down from 51.1%.

Too Late for Meaningful Drug Pricing Legislation this Year?

Although the American public, Congress and the Trump administration have pressed for meaningful legislation over drug pricing, time is running out this year. Congress will recess in August, and when they return, 2020 elections will pick up their pace from their already frenetic speed. It’s possible some legislation will move forward, but many suspect if it does, it will be simplified laws in favor of more meaningful laws.
Democrats in the House of Representatives have a pricing bill, but it is tangled up with internal divisions with progressives. In the Senate, the same thing is happening with a Republic-led drug pricing bill backed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa).
“As we creep now into it being mid-July and without either chamber passing a larger package than what they’ve been able to do so far, I’m starting to think that we may very well end up with just the lower hanging fruit this year,” Julie Allen, senior vice president of the District Policy Group at Drinker Biddle, told The Hill. “Bills that focus on generic and biologic competition and not other provisions that would truly affect drug prices.”
In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) agreed to modify the bill after progressives claimed that a provision allowing Medicare to negotiate lower prices didn’t cover enough drugs. And even assuming this bill made it out of committee, it would face a tough road in the Senate and White House.
In the Senate, the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act was approved by the Judiciary Committee. One of its provisions would place limitations on how drug companies can exploit the patent system to extend monopolies. This bill hasn’t made it to a floor vote yet.
The Senate Finance Committee is working on a more bipartisan bill to limit drug price increases in Medicare, with a markup aimed for mid-July. But there’s a lot of doubt as to whether Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would allow a floor vote for them, assuming they get out of committee ahead of the August recess. There are Republican senators who don’t like the Grassley plan, arguing that it looks like government price controls.

But as a recent New York Times article reports, drug-pricing is a complicated issue that isn’t likely to be “fixed,” assuming it ever can be, with broad legislation.
“All low-priced drugs are alike; all high-priced drugs are high priced in their own way,” wrote Craig Garthwaite, a health economist from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, reported the New York Times.
Aside from Medicaid and the Veterans Health Administration, almost all low-priced drugs are low-priced because of competition. Garthwaite’s research shows that generic competition of a brand-name drug can push prices down 80% below the brand price, even more in some cases. High-priced drugs, despite efforts to create a stronger biosimilar market, are usually high priced and lack competition for a number of different reasons.
Some of it is related to the complex thicket of patents biopharma companies use to protect their high-priced drugs. Some high-priced drugs, such as Vyera Pharmaceuticals (formerly Turing)’ Daraprim, simply lacks competition. This drug became notorious after Martin Shkreli, then Turing’s chief executive officer, increased the price by more than 5,000%, to $750 from $13.50.
AbbVie’s Humira, for example, doesn’t have competition because of patent protection, for the most part. Daraprim, however, lacks competition because it’s been on the market since 1952, and the cost of starting production on it, particularly with competition driving the price down, would likely take too long—or ever—for companies to pay back costs and make a profit.
The FDA has passed some regulations to speed generic approvals, but there are other issues. Most of the highest-priced drugs are biologic drugs, which use living organisms to produce and can cost 20 times more to manufacture than traditional small-molecule drugs. These biologics are much more difficult to duplicate than small-molecule drugs and the biosimilar (essentially a generic version of a biologic drug) approval process is much closer to that of a new drug, requiring extensive clinical trials. Although adoption of biosimilars has been fairly strong in Europe, it lags behind in the U.S., partly due to patent protection.
As a result, some of the U.S. drug-pricing proposals focus on biologics, including one to change Medicare that would link biologics prices to those in other countries.
Drug pricing will likely remain a hot topic, especially with the ongoing U.S. presidential election heating up, but it remains to be seen if anything meaningful will come out of this busy period for such a complex topic.

Capricor Therapeutics (CAPR) PT Raised to $12.40 at H.C. Wainwright

From $3.50

Genmab submits application for subcutaneous Darzalex

Genmab A/S (Nasdaq Copenhagen: GEN) announced today that its licensing partner, Janssen Biotech, Inc., has submitted a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) for the use of the subcutaneous (SubQ) formulation of daratumumab in multiple myeloma indications where the intravenous formulation of daratumumab is currently approved.
In August 2012, Genmab granted Janssen an exclusive worldwide license to develop, manufacture and commercialize daratumumab.
‘Should this submission lead to an approval, it would provide patients with a treatment option that combines efficacy comparable with intravenous DARZALEX with a subcutaneous delivery that reduces treatment time from hours to just minutes. Not only would this be more convenient for patients but, as we saw with the COLUMBA data recently presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting and 24th EHA Annual Congress, infusion-related reactions are both mild and significantly reduced with this formulation of daratumumab,’ said Jan van de Winkel, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Genmab. ‘Subcutaneous daratumumab may also provide an attractive option for health care providers, especially in the community setting, where reducing the administration time can be very important.’
The submission is based on data from two ongoing studies: the Phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study, which is comparing the subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab to the intravenous formulation in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and preliminary non-public data from the Phase II PLEIADES study, which is evaluating daratumumab in combination with certain standard multiple myeloma regimens. The topline results from the COLUMBA data were announced in February 2019 and subsequently presented in oral sessions at the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting and the 24thEuropean Hematology Association Annual Congress.

Gilead gets Aug. 7 FDA panel date on PrEP combo

TIME: 8:30 a.m.
EVENT: Health and Human Services Department; Food and Drug Administration (F.R. Page 29521) holds a meeting of the Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee to discuss supplemental new drug application 208215, supplement 12, DESCOVY (emtricitabine 200 milligrams (mg) and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg tablets), submitted by Gilead Sciences, Inc., proposed for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection among individuals who are HIV-negative and at risk for HIV.
DATE: August 7, 2019
LOCATION: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Building 31 Conference Center, the Great Room, Room 1503, Silver Spring, Md.
CONTACT: Lauren Tesh Hotaki, 301-796-9001, AMDAC@fda.hhs.gov