A study of nearly 400 pregnant women in New York City is among the
first to show that lower neighborhood socioeconomic status and greater
household crowding increase the risk of becoming infected with
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.
“Our study shows that neighborhood socioeconomic status and household
crowding are strongly associated with risk of infection. This may
explain why Black and Hispanic people living in these neighborhoods are
disproportionately at risk for contracting the virus,” says the study’s
leader Alexander Melamed, MD, MPH, assistant professor of obstetrics
& gynecology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians
and Surgeons and a gynecologic oncologist at
NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center.
What the Study Examined
The researchers examined the relationships between SARS-CoV-2
infection and neighborhood characteristics in 396 women who gave birth
at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center or
NewYork-Presbyterian Allen Hospital during the peak of the COVID-19
outbreak in New York City.
Since March 22, all women admitted to the hospitals for delivery have
been tested for the virus, which gave the researchers the opportunity
to detect all infections — including infections with no symptoms — in a
defined population.
Household Density Strongest COVID-19 Predictor
The strongest predictor of COVID-19 infection among these women was
residence in a neighborhood where households with many people are
common.
Women who lived in a neighborhood with high household membership were 3 times more likely to be infected with the virus.
Neighborhood poverty also appeared to be a factor: women were twice
as likely to get COVID-19 if they lived in neighborhoods with a high
poverty rate, although that relationship was not statistically
significant due to the small sample size.
There was no association between infection and population density.
“New York City has the highest population density of any city in the
United States, but our study found that the risks are related more to
density in people’s domestic environments rather than density in the
city or within neighborhoods,” says co-author Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman,
MD, the Ellen Jacobson Levine and Eugene Jacobson Professor of Women’s
Health in Columbia’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and a
maternal-fetal medicine specialist at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia
University Irving Medical Center.
Public Health Implications
The study reveals information important for public health officials.
“One may think that because New York City is so dense, there’s little
that can slow the spread of the virus, but our study suggests the risk
of infection is related to household, rather than urban, density,”
Gyamfi-Bannerman says.
“For our pregnant patients, that may mean counseling women about the
risk of infection if they are considering bringing in other family
members to help during pregnancy or postpartum,” she says.
“The knowledge that SARS-CoV-2 infection rates are higher in
disadvantaged neighborhoods and among people who live in crowded
households,” Melamed adds, “could help public health officials target
preventive measures, like distributing masks or culturally competent
educational information to these populations.”
###
More information
“Associations Between Built Environment, Neighborhood Socioeconomic
Status, and SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Pregnant Women in New York City,”
was published online June 18 in the
Journal of the American Medical Association.
Other authors: Ukachi N. Emeruwa, Samsiya Ona, Jeffrey L. Shaman, Amy
Turitz, Jason D. Wright (from Columbia University Irving Medical Center
and NewYork-Presbyterian).
This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants
KL2TR001874, 1U01GM110748, 2R01HL098554, 5UG1HD040485); National
Science Foundation (DMS-2027369); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine;
and the Morris-Singer Foundation.
J. Shaman and Columbia University reported partial ownership of SK
Analytics. J. Shaman reported receiving personal fees from Business
Networking International and Merck. C. Gyamfi-Bannerman reported
receiving personal fees from Sera. J. Wright reported receiving grants
from Merck and receiving personal fees from Clovis Oncology. No other
disclosures were reported.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-06/cuim-chp061820.php