Search This Blog

Friday, January 13, 2023

Take Dangerous Abortion Drugs Off The Market

 In the Biden administration's latest reckless move to promote abortion on demand, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has formally eliminated its rules against sending DIY abortion drugs through the mail. For the first time, it has also cleared the way for retail pharmacies to become certified distributors of chemical abortion pills where state law permits.

The Biden administration's lethal innovation allows abortion pills to be sent by mail without any in-person exam and with little involvement from medical professionals. But the betrayal of unborn children, their mothers, and the public with regard to the dangers of these drugs began more than 20 years ago at the hands of the FDA—the agency tasked with ensuring that Americans' food supply and medications are safe.

The "abortion pill" that the FDA approved, mifepristone (Mifeprex or RU486), is the first drug in a two-step process. Mifepristone starves the unborn baby of hormonal support. When used as part of the abortion drug regimen, a second drug—misoprostol—then induces contractions to expel the baby.

Chemical abortion drugs are driving an alarming increase in the number of abortions after decades of progress reducing those numbers. They now account for more than half of all abortions in the United States. That's without even accounting for abortion drugs shipped illegally by pro-abortion groups that operate overseas and outside of the law.

It gets worse: chemical abortion drugs are even more dangerous than surgical abortion, carrying a 53 percent greater risk for an ER visit for abortion complications. Encouragingly, a group of doctors led by the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine is taking legal action to hold the FDA accountable for its dereliction of duty and put a stop to deadly chemical abortions.

The alliance filed a lawsuit laying out how the FDA failed to apply the same scrutiny to abortion drugs that it applies to other drugs before approving them for market. It argues the FDA never studied whether the drugs were safe "under the labeled conditions of use," never investigated how the regimen might affect girls whose bodies are still developing, and disregarded evidence showing chemical abortion drugs cause more complications than surgical abortions. In fact, to justify its egregious decision, the FDA had to treat pregnancy as though it were an illness.

Sadly, skirting the law has become a trend for the FDA; a recent congressional investigation suggests a disturbing pattern in which the FDA ignores its own protocols for approving drugs. Abortion is not health care, and the abortion drug regimen should never have been approved because it does not treat a disease. Now abortion activists want to turn every post office and pharmacy into an abortion business, with the Biden FDA as a complicit partner.

How consequential is this lawsuit? One pro-abortion state legislator told the Huffington Post "it would be apocalyptic" if it succeeded. Another said, dramatically, "it would literally cripple the way that we function as a country. It would rise to the point of a human rights violation. I get emotional even thinking about it." The abortion lobby is terrified of losing its highly profitable workaround to abortion regulations after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

Media coverage of these drugs has tended to lionize the "covert networks" that traffic in them. The reality is far less glamorous and more disturbing. Not only does the chemical abortion regimen end the life of an innocent child, but it can also create lasting emotional trauma for the mother and put her at risk for serious health complications. The side effects of these pills, noted in multiple peer-reviewed studies, include hemorrhaging, severe infections, need for follow-up surgery, and even death. Since the drug was first authorized in 2000, there has been a 500 percent increase in the rate of emergency room visits related to chemical abortion—a serious public health threat.

Now that women are not required to see a doctor before attempting a chemical abortion themselves, life-threatening conditions such as ectopic pregnancies will go undetected and more women will need follow-up surgery due to underestimation of gestational age. Women will not receive routine screenings needed to prevent future pregnancy complications. No longer do they have the opportunity by default to confide in a physician—who may be the only one in a position to detect domestic violence and sex trafficking—in person and in a private setting.

We know that abusers have easy access to abortion drugs. In one recent case, a Texas woman discovered she was pregnant after her husband moved out. Not long after, she found a mysterious cloudy substance in her drink and had to be rushed to the hospital with severe bleeding. The culprit: misoprostol, which she found in the trash after becoming suspicious. A police affidavit states the husband allegedly felt the pregnancy "would ruin his plans and make him look like a jerk." Fortunately the woman and her baby survived. Each and every one deserves that chance.

The evidence on the dire threat of chemical abortion drugs is in. It indicts not only pro-abortion Democrats who recklessly push their agenda at the expense of women and children, doing their part to create the current wild-west environment, but FDA bureaucrats, whose failures go back decades. A growing number of states are standing up to the Biden administration and enacting protections of their own. This trend is encouraging, but more action at the federal level is clearly needed.

It is past time to revoke FDA approval of abortion pills. If the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine prevails in its effort, as we hope it will, it would be an enormous victory for women's health and safety and the lives of unborn children.

Marjorie Dannenfelser is president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America.

https://www.newsweek.com/take-dangerous-abortion-drugs-off-market-opinion-1773043

Jim Jordan opens investigation into Garland over Biden classified docs scandal

 The new Republican chairman of the House Judiciary Committee has launched his first investigation — scrutinizing the White House and Justice Department over their handling of President Joe Biden’s classified documents scandal.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, fired off a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday, demanding all documents and communications between the DOJ, the FBI, and the Executive Office of the President about Biden’s apparent mishandling of classified information following his time as vice president during the Obama administration.

The Republican letter, co-signed by another top GOP member of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA), also demanded that Garland hand over details about the appointment of DOJ veteran and former Trump federal prosecutor Robert Hur to be the special counsel handling the Biden classified records saga.

Biden’s lawyers have admitted that Obama-era records with classified markings on them were found in Biden’s office at the Penn Biden Center in the nation’s capital in early November, with more classified documents found in Biden’s garage in Delaware in December, and then further classified documents found in his Delaware home on Thursday.

“We are conducting oversight of the Justice Department's actions with respect to former Vice President Biden's mishandling of classified documents, including the apparently unauthorized possession of classified material at a Washington, D.C. private office and in the garage of his Wilmington, Delaware residence,” the House Republicans told Garland in the Friday letter.

Garland had appointed Kosovo war crimes prosecutor Jack Smith late last year to take over the Justice Department’s investigation of classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago. The Biden attorney general then selected Hur to be special counsel in the Biden saga on Thursday.

Hur’s most recent government position was as the U.S. attorney for Maryland during the Trump administration, and he previously worked for Trump deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein early in the Trump administration and, years prior, for now-FBI Director Christopher Wray at the Justice Department.

The House Republicans told Garland that “the circumstances of this appointment raise fundamental oversight questions that the Committee routinely examines” and that “we expect your complete cooperation with our inquiry.”

“It is unclear when the Department first came to learn about the existence of these documents, and whether it actively concealed this information from the public on the eve of the 2022 elections," the GOP letter to Garland said. "It is also unclear what interactions, if any, the Department had with President Biden or his representatives about his mishandling of classified material. The Department’s actions here appear to depart from how it acted in similar circumstances.”

Garland had previously selected U.S. Attorney John Lausch, a Trump-appointed holdover, to handle the Justice Department’s investigation into Biden improperly keeping classified documents. Lausch, who flanked Garland during his Thursday announcement, is one of only two Trump-appointed federal prosecutors kept on by Biden — the other is David Weiss, the U.S. attorney for Delaware, who is investigating Biden’s son Hunter.

The Republicans asked on Friday for all records related to the selection of Lausch to do the initial investigation and related to the choice of Hur as special counsel. The GOP investigators also asked for all documents between or among the DOJ, the FBI, and the White House related to classified records found at the Penn Biden Center and at Biden’s home. The letter also told Garland to hand over all communications between the DOJ and Biden’s lawyers related to the classified documents saga.

Jordan and Johnson also told the Justice Department to provide all of the documents and communications related to the storage of the classified records at Biden’s office and his home, as well as all records tied to the discovery of the documents with classified markings.

Garland provided a timeline of events to explain why he had chosen to select Hur as special counsel on Thursday.

The attorney general said that on Nov. 4, the National Archives inspector general told a prosecutor at the Justice Department that the White House had informed them about the records found at the Penn Biden Center, with Garland noting that “that office was not authorized for storage of classified documents.”

The FBI began its assessment of whether the classified records had been mishandled on Nov. 9, Garland said, and on Nov. 14, Garland assigned Lausch to conduct an initial investigation into the matter to help the attorney general decide whether to appoint a special counsel.

Garland said that Biden’s personal lawyer then told Lausch on Dec. 20 that more classified documents were found “in the garage” of Biden’s personal home in Wilmington, Delaware. The FBI went there and secured those documents as well.

The Biden attorney general said Lausch then briefed him on Jan. 5 about the results of the initial investigation, with Lausch advising Garland that “a special counsel was warranted.” Garland said that, based on what Lausch had found, “I concluded that, under the special counsel regulations, it was in the public interest to appoint a special counsel.”

Lausch then continued his investigation while the Justice Department identified Hur as the best pick for special counsel.

“This morning, President Biden’s personal counsel called Mr. Lausch and stated that an additional document with classified markings was identified at the president’s personal residence,” Garland said. Biden had said earlier Thursday that a classified record had been found in his “personal library.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/jim-jordan-investigates-garland-biden-classified-docs-scandal

Public Schools Face Dramatic Rise in Student Misbehavior

 Reports of student misbehavior have risen sharply in public schools, as districts also report widespread “stunted” social development among students.

Yet special education resources may not be able to cope with the subsequent rise in students with special needs.

The annual “School Pulse Panel,” a survey conducted by the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute for Education Sciences (IES), revealed some troubling trends:

  • More than 80% of public schools reported “stunted behavioral and socioemotional development” among students because of the COVID-19 pandemic. 
  • Schools also saw a 56% increase in “classroom disruptions from student misconduct” and a 49% increase in “rowdiness outside of the classroom.” 
  • Seven in 10 public schools reported increases in students seeking mental health services since the start of the pandemic. 

Many of the problems reported in the survey were preexisting, even if exacerbated by pandemic policies. For example, the demand for social and mental health services was already trending upward well before COVID-19. 

Data reveal struggling students are increasingly turning to special education professionals following a return to in-person classes. 

The National Center for Education Statistics reports more than seven million children in America receive special education services, roughly 15% of kids in grades K-12. This caseload predates the pandemic and represents a level of need that is already straining district budgets. 

According to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, each special needs student must have an Individual Education Plan (IEP). IEP teams are comprised of therapists and psychologists, as well as teachers and administrators.  

However, as schools struggle to find these professionals and more students request special education services, the pre-existing deficit between students and resources increases, leaving more would-be special education students without federally mandated care and placing schools and districts in legal jeopardy. 

IES data reveals roughly 60% of public schools already lack enough professional staff to meet their school’s need for mental health and behavioral intervention services. 

If resources are tapped, students for whom special education services are essential will be harmed by the resulting diminishment of services. 

This strain on special education raises the question of whether the use of limited special education resources is appropriate for students whose difficulties don’t necessarily impair their learning long term, but rather are more indicative of an episodic struggle. 

However, parents in states that offer school choice programs may qualify for scholarships that can be used for special education tutoring or even enrollment in a private school.

Faster knee for better walking

 Osaka Metropolitan University scientists delved into the relationship between gait function and knee extension velocity after total knee arthroplasty and compared the effects of various factors on walking. The results reveal that knee extension velocity, measured while seated, on the operated side was the most important determinant of gait function. These findings are expected to contribute to the development of new rehabilitation programs for efficient gait function improvement.

"Speed or strength, which is more important?" may be a critical question for not only athletes but also knee surgery patients. Osaka Metropolitan University scientists have revealed that knee extension velocity while seated is a stronger predictor of walking performance than muscle strength in elderly patients after their total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery.

TKA is the most common surgical intervention for knee osteoarthritis, a musculoskeletal disorder that mainly progresses with age. This surgery has been shown to be effective in relieving pain and restoring joint range of motion; however, TKA-enabled improvement in gait function may not be sufficient. Although the strength of the quadriceps -- a muscle used to extend the knee -- has been deemed to have a significant effect on postoperative gait function in TKA patients, there are many cases in which gait function does not improve even after quadriceps strength is restored. This raises a need to identify other factors influencing gait function.

A research team led by Professor Akira Iwata, from the Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science at Osaka Metropolitan University, hypothesized that the movement velocity of knee extension (i.e., knee extension velocity) is a strong determinant of gait function in TKA patients, and tested this hypothesis on 186 elderly patients who underwent TKA. Measurements were taken before and at 2 and 3 weeks after surgery and included gait function (gait speed and Timed Up and Go test), knee extension velocity, quadriceps strength, knee range of motion, and knee pain. Multiple regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between gait function and other variables.

The results show that the knee extension velocity on the operated side was the most important predictor of gait function in the participating patients. The findings were published in PLOS ONE.

"Thus far, rehabilitation programs aimed at recovering gait function after TKA surgery have focused on training to improve quadriceps strength," explained Professor Iwata. "However, this study's results suggest that training to enhance knee extension velocity on the operated side could be effective. We will continue to examine the effects of rehabilitation that concentrates on movement velocity."

Story Source:

Materials provided by Osaka Metropolitan UniversityNote: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Akira Iwata, Yuki Sano, Hideyuki Wanaka, Shingo Kobayashi, Kensuke Okamoto, Jun Yamahara, Masaki Inaba, Yuya Konishi, Junji Inoue, Atsuki Kanayama, Saki Yamamoto, Hiroshi Iwata. Maximum knee extension velocity without external load is a stronger determinant of gait function than quadriceps strength in the early postoperative period following total knee arthroplastyPLOS ONE, 2022; 17 (11): e0276219 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276219

Potential new approach for treating lupus

 Targeting iron metabolism in immune system cells may offer a new approach for treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) -- the most common form of the chronic autoimmune disease lupus.

A multidisciplinary team of investigators at Vanderbilt University Medical Center has discovered that blocking an iron uptake receptor reduces disease pathology and promotes the activity of anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells in a mouse model of SLE. The findings were published Jan. 13 in the journal Science Immunology.

Lupus, including SLE, occurs when the immune system attacks a person's own healthy tissues, causing pain, inflammation and tissue damage. Lupus most commonly affects skin, joints, brain, lungs, kidneys and blood vessels. About 1.5 million Americans and 5 million people worldwide have a form of lupus, according to the Lupus Foundation of America.

Treatments for lupus aim to control symptoms, reduce immune system attack of tissues, and protect organs from damage. Only one targeted biologic agent has been approved for treating SLE, belimumab in 2011.

"It has been a real challenge to come up with new therapies for lupus," said Jeffrey Rathmell, PhD, professor of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology and Cornelius Vanderbilt Chair in Immunobiology. "The patient population and the disease are heterogeneous, which makes it difficult to design and conduct clinical trials."

Rathmell's group has had a long-standing interest in lupus as part of a broader effort to understand mechanisms of autoimmunity.

When postdoctoral fellow Kelsey Voss, PhD, began studying T cell metabolism in lupus, she noticed that iron appeared to be a "common denominator in many of the problems in T cells," she said. She was also intrigued by the finding that T cells from patients with lupus have high iron levels, even though patients are often anemic.

"It was not clear why the T cells were high in iron, or what that meant," said Voss, first author of the Science Immunology paper.

To explore T cell iron metabolism in lupus, Voss and Rathmell drew on the expertise of other investigators at VUMC:

  • Eric Skaar, PhD, and his team are experienced in the study of iron and other metals;

  • Amy Major, PhD, and her group provided a mouse model of SLE; and

  • Michelle Ormseth, MD, MSCI, and her team recruited patients with SLE to provide blood samples.

First, Voss used a CRISPR genome editing screen to evaluate iron-handling genes in T cells. She identified the transferrin receptor, which imports iron into cells, as critical for inflammatory T cells and inhibitory for anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells.

The researchers found that the transferrin receptor was more highly expressed on T cells from SLE-prone mice and T cells from patients with SLE, which caused the cells to accumulate too much iron.

"We see a lot of complications coming from that -- the mitochondria don't function properly, and other signaling pathways are altered," Voss said.

An antibody that blocks the transferrin receptor reduced intracellular iron levels, inhibited inflammatory T cell activity, and enhanced regulatory T cell activity. Treatment of SLE-prone mice with the antibody reduced kidney and liver pathology and increased production of the anti-inflammatory factor, IL-10.

"It was really surprising and exciting to find different effects of the transferrin receptor in different types of T cells," Voss said. "If you're trying to target an autoimmune disease by affecting T cell function, you want to inhibit inflammatory T cells but not harm regulatory T cells. That's exactly what targeting the transferrin receptor did."

In T cells from patients with lupus, expression of the transferrin receptor correlated with disease severity, and blocking the receptor in vitro enhanced production of IL-10.

The researchers are interested in developing transferrin receptor antibodies that bind specifically to T cells, to avoid any potential off-target effects (the transferrin receptor mediates iron uptake in many cell types). They are also interested in studying the details of their unexpected discovery that blocking the transferrin receptor enhances regulatory T cell activity.

Skaar is the Ernest W. Goodpasture Professor of Pathology and director of the Vanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation. Major, associate professor of Medicine, and Ormseth, assistant professor of Medicine, are faculty members in the Division of Rheumatology and Immunology. Rathmell is the director of the Vanderbilt Center for Immunobiology.

Other authors of the study include Allison Sewell, Evan Krystofiak, PhD, Katherine Gibson-Corley, DVM, PhD, Arissa Young, MD, Jacob Basham, MD, Ayaka Sugiura, PhD, Emily Arner, PhD, William Beavers, PhD, Dillon Kunkle, PhD, Megan Dickson, Gabriel Needle, and W. Kimryn Rathmell, MD, PhD.

The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants DK105550, AI153167, DK101003, AI150701, CA253718) and the Lupus Research Alliance William Paul Distinguished Innovator Award to Jeffrey Rathmell.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Original written by Leigh MacMillan. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Kelsey Voss, Allison E. Sewell, Evan S. Krystofiak, Katherine N. Gibson-Corley, Arissa C. Young, Jacob H. Basham, Ayaka Sugiura, Emily N. Arner, William N. Beavers, Dillon E. Kunkle, Megan E. Dickson, Gabriel A. Needle, Eric P. Skaar, W. Kimryn Rathmell, Michelle J. Ormseth, Amy S. Major, Jeffrey C. Rathmell. Elevated transferrin receptor impairs T cell metabolism and function in systemic lupus erythematosusScience Immunology, 2023; 8 (79) DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abq0178

Managing emotions better could prevent pathological aging

 Negative emotions, anxiety and depression are thought to promote the onset of neurodegenerative diseases and dementia. But what is their impact on the brain and can their deleterious effects be limited? Neuroscientists at the University of Geneva (UNIGE) observed the activation of the brains of young and older adults when confronted with the psychological suffering of others. The neuronal connections of the older adults show significant emotional inertia: negative emotions modify them excessively and over a long period of time, particularly in the posterior cingulate cortex and the amygdala, two brain regions strongly involved in the management of emotions and autobiographical memory. These results, to be published in Nature Aging, indicate that a better management of these emotions -- through meditation for example -- could help limit neurodegeneration.

For the past 20 years, neuroscientists have been looking at how the brain reacts to emotions. ''We are beginning to understand what happens at the moment of perception of an emotional stimulus,'' explains Dr Olga Klimecki, a researcher at the UNIGE's Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences and at the Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, who is last author of this study carried out as part of a European research project co-directed by the UNIGE. ''However, what happens afterwards remains a mystery. How does the brain switch from one emotion to another? How does it return to its initial state? Does emotional variability change with age? What are the consequences for the brain of mismanagement of emotions?''

Previous studies in psychology have shown that an ability to change emotions quickly is beneficial for mental health. Conversely, people who are unable to regulate their emotions and remain in the same emotional state for a long time are at higher risks of depression. ''Our aim was to determine what cerebral trace remains after the viewing of emotional scenes, in order to evaluate the brain's reaction, and, above all, its recovery mechanisms. We focused on the older adults, in order to identify possible differences between normal and pathological ageing,'' says Patrik Vuilleumier, professor in the Department of Basic Neurosciences at the Faculty of Medicine and at the Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences at the UNIGE, who co-directed this work.

Not all brains are created equal

The scientists showed volunteers short television clips showing people in a state of emotional suffering -- during a natural disaster or distress situation for example -- as well as videos with neutral emotional content, in order to observe their brain activity using functional MRI. First, the team compared a group of 27 people over 65 years of age with a group of 29 people aged around 25 years. The same experiment was then repeated with 127 older adults.

''Older people generally show a different pattern of brain activity and connectivity from younger people,'' says Sebastian Baez Lugo, a researcher in Patrik Vuilleumier's laboratory and the first author of this work. ''This is particularly noticeable in the level of activation of the default mode network, a brain network that is highly activated in resting state. Its activity is frequently disrupted by depression or anxiety, suggesting that it is involved in the regulation of emotions. In the older adults, part of this network, the posterior cingulate cortex, which processes autobiographical memory, shows an increase in its connections with the amygdala, which processes important emotional stimuli. These connections are stronger in subjects with high anxiety scores, with rumination, or with negative thoughts.''

Empathy and ageing

However, older people tend to regulate their emotions better than younger people, and focus more easily on positive details, even during a negative event. But changes in connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex and the amygdala could indicate a deviation from the normal ageing phenomenon, accentuated in people who show more anxiety, rumination and negative emotions. The posterior cingulate cortex is one of the regions most affected by dementia, suggesting that the presence of these symptoms could increase the risk of neurodegenerative disease.

''Is it poor emotional regulation and anxiety that increases the risk of dementia or the other way around? We still don't know,'' says Sebastian Baez Lugo. ''Our hypothesis is that more anxious people would have no or less capacity for emotional distancing. The mechanism of emotional inertia in the context of ageing would then be explained by the fact that the brain of these people remains 'frozen' in a negative state by relating the suffering of others to their own emotional memories."

Could meditation be a solution?

Could it be possible to prevent dementia by acting on the mechanism of emotional inertia? The research team is currently conducting an 18-month interventional study to evaluate the effects of foreign language learning on the one hand, and meditation practice on the other. ''In order to further refine our results, we will also compare the effects of two types of meditation: mindfulness, which consists of anchoring oneself in the present in order to concentrate on one's own feelings, and what is known as 'compassionate' meditation, which aims to actively increase positive emotions towards others,'' the authors add.

This research is part of a large European study, MEDIT-AGEING, which aims to evaluate the impact of non-pharmacological interventions for better ageing.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Université de GenèveNote: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Sebastian Baez-Lugo, Yacila I. Deza-Araujo, Christel Maradan, Fabienne Collette, Antoine Lutz, Natalie L. Marchant, Gaël Chételat, Patrik Vuilleumier, Olga Klimecki, Eider Arenaza-Urquijo, Claire André, Maelle Botton, Pauline Cantou, Gaëlle Chételat, Anne Chocat, Vincent De la Sayette, Marion Delarue, Stéphanie Egret, Eglantine Ferrand Devouge, Eric Frison, Julie Gonneaud, Marc Heidmann, Elizabeth Kuhn, Brigitte Landeau, Gwendoline Le Du, Valérie Lefranc, Florence Mezenge, Inès Moulinet, Valentin Ourry, Géraldine Poisnel, Anne Quillard, Géraldine Rauchs, Stéphane Rehel, Clémence Tomadesso, Edelweiss Touron, Caitlin Ware, Miranka Wirth. Exposure to negative socio-emotional events induces sustained alteration of resting-state brain networks in older adultsNature Aging, 2023; DOI: 10.1038/s43587-022-00341-6

How Painful Is Medication Abortion?

 Although medication abortion is an effective procedure, it does cause physical pain that, in some cases, can be quite intense. Knowing whether a patient is at risk of experiencing severe pain is vital to ensure proper pain management. An Italian study published last month in the journal Contraception offers helpful insight on this front. Its main conclusion? "Increased baseline anxiety levels, dysmenorrhea, and no previous vaginal deliveries are associated with severe pain in women undergoing medication abortion."

The study was carried out by researchers from the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the Maggiore Hospital – Bologna Local Health Authority and the Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology Unit of the Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Policlinic Hospital, also in Bologna. The team's analysis included 242 patients who, in the first trimester of pregnancy, underwent medication abortion — mifepristone, then misoprostol, according to local and regional medication abortion guidelines.

To establish baseline anxiety levels, the participants were asked to fill out two validated questionnaires. For pain relief, ibuprofen was given to all of the women; oral morphine was prescribed upon request. After the observation period (a minimum of 6 hours from the first dose of misoprostol), the nursing staff asked the patients to mark the visual analog scale (VAS) at the point corresponding to the intensity of the strongest pain experienced during the procedure. (Only symptoms experienced prior to taking morphine were to be considered.)

The analysis showed that 38% of the women reported severe pain (VAS ≥ 70) during the medication abortion. The researchers noted a significant correlation between baseline anxiety level and pain perception: women with higher baseline anxiety levels were three times more likely to experience severe pain (odds ratio [OR], 3.33; 95% CI, 1.43 - 7.76). The numbers were even higher for those who reported dysmenorrhea within the year preceding the medication abortion. Compared with the other women, they were six times more likely (OR, 6.30; 95% CI, 2.66 - 14.91). On the other hand, having a previous vaginal delivery considerably reduced the risk of experiencing that level of pain (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 - 0.50).

"Physicians should protect a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy in the most comfortable setting possible. In addition, pain management during medication abortion remains a problem," the researchers point out. "The identification of women at risk for severe pain may help to improve women's care and pain management during medication abortion, making the procedure a more acceptable alternative to surgical abortion. Other studies are needed to define an adequate analgesic regimen for these patients — studies that should also take into consideration the clinical and historical factors identified in our research as being predictive of severe pain."

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/986942