Search This Blog

Monday, August 21, 2023

Kaiser Permanente's National Expansion Faces Wide Skepticism

 As regulators review Kaiser Permanente's proposed acquisition of a respected health system based in Pennsylvania, healthcare experts are still puzzling over how the surprise deal

opens in a new tab or window, announced in April, could fulfill the managed care giant's promise of improving care and reducing costs for patients, including in its home state of California.

Kaiser Permanente (KP) said it would acquire Danville, Pennsylvania-based Geisinger -- which has 10 hospitals, 1,700 employed physicians, and a 600,000-member health plan in three states -- as the first step in the creation of a new national healthcare organization called Risant Health. Oakland-based Kaiser Permanente said it expects to invest $5 billion in Risant over the next 5 years and to add as many as six more nonprofit health systems during that period.

Industry experts believe KP's aim is to build a big enough presence across the country to effectively compete with players like Amazon, Aetna CVS Health, Walmart Health, and UnitedHealth Group in providing healthcare for large corporate customers. Kaiser Permanente executives touted the potential for spreading the group's vaunted brand of quality, lower-cost care around the country.

But it's not clear how KP will be able to bring its model, in which facilities and doctors receive a monthly per-member fee for all care, to markets where it doesn't own an integrated system of physicians, hospitals, and health plans, as it does in California. Critics note that KP's efforts to expand failed in a number of states in the 1980s and 1990s.

In addition, the physician-led Permanente Medical Groups, which lead KP's patient care, were not involved in the Risant deal, raising questions about how their expertise would be shared.

"I don't know how Kaiser will bring its knowledge and best practices to improve healthcare delivery without the involvement of the medical group, which does all the care delivery," said Robert Pearl, a former CEO of the Permanente Medical Group who's now a lecturer at the Stanford Graduate School of Business in California.

There are also questions about how the expansion will benefit current KP customers. The tax-exempt, nonprofit organization has 39 hospitals, 24,000 physicians, and 12.7 million health plan members in eight states and Washington, D.C., though about three-quarters of its members are in California, where it controls nearly halfopens in a new tab or window of the private insuranceopens in a new tab or window market. KP reported $95 billion in revenue last year.

"We've asked Kaiser Permanente management questions about the deal's advantages to employees and customers, but we haven't heard back," said Caroline Lucas, the executive director of the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions, several of which are in contentious contract talks with the company. "Where is the money coming from? Are the citizens of California and other states subsidizing this expansion? How are they benefiting?"

Kaiser Permanente CEO Greg Adams declined to comment. A KP spokesperson, Steve Shivinsky, said the group's physicians would be involved in developing a "platform" to offer other health systems its value-based care expertise, including in design of care models, pharmacy practices, consumer digital engagement, development of health insurance products, and best practices for supply chains. Shivinsky said work on the platform was just beginning.

"Risant Health's success will firmly establish value-based care as a better model for healthcare in this country," said Shivinsky, KP's director of national media relations.

"If there is a commitment to truly delivering higher-quality and lower-cost care, it will take time and hard work," said John Toussaint, MD, chair of Catalysis, a nonprofit that trains executives in healthcare and other industries in quality improvement. "But frankly I'm skeptical that's the reason for these types of mergers. Bigger may be better for increasing prices, but not necessarily for improving care."

The deal may be a sign that KP, founded in 1945, is hearing the alluring call of lucrative fee-for-service medicine. "This gets Kaiser into the much bigger part of the market -- commercial insurance -- and expands beyond their traditional model of owning all the pieces and selling their own insurance," said Glenn Melnick, a health economics professor at the University of Southern California.

The Geisinger acquisition is being reviewed by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department, with a 30-day public comment periodopens in a new tab or window ending Aug. 7, 2023. The Federal Trade Commission and the California attorney general's office declined to say whether they were reviewing the deal. KP expects the deal to close sometime in 2024. There was no purchase price disclosed, but KP said Risant would make a minimum of $2 billion available to Geisinger through 2028, including income that Geisinger generates itself.

Federal and state antitrust regulators have expressed growing concern about consolidation of hospitals and physician groups into ever-larger organizations with the power to drive up prices. But antitrust experts sayopens in a new tab or window it's unlikely regulators will challenge the deal since KP does not currently have a presence in Pennsylvania, Delaware, or Maine, where Geisinger operates.

Indeed, the deal could boost competition if KP's investment enables Geisinger to expand beyond central and eastern Pennsylvania and take on the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and Highmark, the state's two dominant integrated health systems.

Around the country, Risant could be appealing to businesses that offer health plans to their employees. "If Kaiser can become an effective player in more markets through Risant and that leads to greater price competition, that will be very attractive to large employers," said Bill Kramer, senior adviser for health policy at the Purchaser Business Group on Health, which represents large employer health plans.

Smaller health systems and physician groups that are struggling financially may also see joining Risant as a more palatable option than being acquired by more profit-hungry entities, such as private equity firms, Melnick noted.

Through tight coordination between its physicians, hospitals, and health plans, KP has a strong track recordopens in a new tab or window of producing good health outcomes, particularly for plan members with chronic conditions such as high blood pressure and diabetes. KP hospitals and doctors are paid a monthly per-member fee for all care -- called capitated payment. That gives KP a powerful financial incentive to keep members healthy and prevent costly hospital admissions and emergency room visits.

In contrast, Geisinger and most other health systems across the country generally are paid for each separate procedure -- known as fee-for-service payment -- giving them less incentive to keep patients healthy and reduce overall costs. Because of that, it's not clear how KP's value-based care model will work at Geisinger and other health systems acquired through Risant.

Adams has said Risant won't try to fully replicate Kaiser Permanente's model. Instead, Risant will help other health systems achieve the same kind of outcomes and cost savings while working with multiple insurers and providers.

KP also could potentially learn lessons from Geisinger and other health systems about producing better health outcomes at lower cost for members. Geisinger has won acclaim for its ProvenCare modelopens in a new tab or window, in which it accepts a fixed fee for providing an entire episode of care, such as heart bypass surgery, with no extra charge if the outcome isn't satisfactory and the patient needs additional care.

But Kramer, a former KP executive, is skeptical. "It's hard if not impossible to transform a medical group that's reliant on fee-for-service payment into something like the Kaiser Permanente Medical Group," he said.

Critics of the deal, citing KP's failed expansion movesopens in a new tab or window in the 1980s and 1990s, also worry that building Risant Health could distract KP executives from cost-control and quality improvement efforts in their home state and draw down the organization's financial reserves, potentially leading to premium hikes.

In 1999, for example, KP sold a money-losing medical group it had established in North Carolina in the mid-'80s. It faced opposition from the local medical community and challenges with employer health plans, among other factors. Kramer also pointed to its withdrawal from other markets including Connecticut, Missouri, Ohio, and Texas.

Still, KP did succeed in establishing a significant presence in the mid-Atlantic states, Washington, D.C., and Georgia, though it doesn't own hospitals in those markets. It also has long-standing operations in Hawaii, Colorado, and Oregon.

With Risant, KP will be up against very large, sophisticated managed care competitors including UnitedHealth's Optum, which employs about 70,000 physicians

opens in a new tab or window across the country.

"Hopefully Kaiser's senior leadership will be smarter this time around and avoid the kinds of problems they had when they expanded in the past," Kramer said.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/105941

Higher Mortality Risk After COVID Lasts About 6 Months: VA Study

 While the 2-year mortality risk after a COVID-19 infection was higher overall among U.S. veterans, there was no excess mortality after the first 6 months post infection compared with uninfected individuals, according to a large retrospective cohort study.

Veterans who had been infected with COVID from March 2020 to April 2021 had an unadjusted mortality rate of 8.7% during the 2-year period after their infection compared with a rate of 4.1% for matched uninfected veterans (P<0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 2.01 (95% CI 1.98-2.04) with censoring if the comparator later developed COVID, reported Theodore J. Iwashyna, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and colleagues.

The risk of excess death went down over time, with the highest risk on days 0 to 90 after infection (aHR 6.36, 95% CI 6.20-6.51), and risk still elevated during days 91 to 180 (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.23), they noted in JAMA Internal Medicine

opens in a new tab or window.

However, those who survived COVID had decreased mortality at days 181 through 365 (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.95), which further decreased on days 366 through 730 (aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.92).

This return to the same mortality risk more than 6 months after COVID-19 was not expected, Iwashyna told MedPage Today.

"There was no clinically significant ongoing increased risk of death from 6 months to 24 months out," he noted. "We'll have to wait and see if that remains true for longer periods of time."

He pointed out that patients who were hospitalized at the time of their initial COVID infection did have an ongoing higher risk of death throughout the 2 years.

The purpose of the study was to determine if survivors of acute COVID continued to have a higher mortality risk, and if so, for how long. "People who survive a hospitalization for sepsis are more likely to die for years afterwards, and we feared this might be true for all COVID patients, too -- especially with all the data showing that COVID survivors get diagnosed with lots of other potentially harmful diagnoses in the months after COVID," Iwashyna said.

"We really need to improve our follow-up care for patients hospitalized with COVID and other kinds of pneumonia," he added. "Hospital discharge is not the end of their risk, and we need to better support them for years afterwards."

The short time period in which excess mortality occurs after COVID is well known, Aaron E. Glatt, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, told MedPage Today, noting that sicker patients may have been culled out early by a COVID infection, which may be why mortality risk returns to normal after only 6 months.

It is also possible that the cohorts were not large enough to tease out a small impact on changes in mortality rates, he said.

This finding that mortality rates return to normal could be useful in reassuring patients who contract COVID that their health will get back on track, he added.

For this study, Iwashyna and team used prospectively collected health record data from Veterans Affairs hospitals across the U.S. on those who had COVID from March 2020 to April 2021.

They included 208,061 veterans with first-documented COVID infection (mean age 60.5, 88.1% men, 67.1% white, and 22.9% Black) and matched them with 1,037,423 uninfected comparators (up to five each) with similar characteristics.

The authors noted that follow-up only went to 24 months for individuals infected in 2020 and early 2021. Therefore, their results should not be generalized to later variants or the period of time in which home testing and vaccination became more widespread.

Furthermore, "the potential cumulative effects of COVID-19 will not be fully seen for years or decades to come -- these data suggest ongoing differences for which follow-up is needed," they wrote.

Disclosures

This study was supported by the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Service through service awards for the COVID Observational Research Collaborative; and for use of the VA-linked Medicare data. Two co-authors were supported in part by a VA Research Career Scientist Award.

Iwashyna reported grants from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development and the NIH.

Co-authors reported relationships with government and foundation sources.

Primary Source

JAMA Internal Medicine

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowIwashyna TJ, et al "Late mortality after COVID-19 infection among US veterans vs risk-matched comparators: a 2-year cohort analysis" JAMA Intern Med 2023; DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3587.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/105969

Toddlers' Screen Time Linked to Delayed Development

 Young children who spent more time in front of screens -- whether television, video games, or mobile phones and other electronic devices -- had higher likelihood of developmental delays, according to a Japanese study.

In a cohort study of 7,097 children, greater screen time for children 1 year of age was associated with developmental delays in communication and problem-solving at 2 and 4 years of age, reported Taku Obara, PhD, of Tohoku University in Sendai, Japan, and colleagues writing in JAMA Pediatricsopens in a new tab or window.

Compared with less than an hour a day of screen time at 1 year of age, communication developmental delay at 2 years of age was 61% more likely for those getting up to 2 hours of screen time per day, twofold more likely with 2 hours to less than 4 hours a day, and nearly fivefold more likely with 4 or more hours of screen time per day.

For fine motor skills, 4 or more hours a day in front of a screen was linked to 74% higher risk of developmental delay at 2 years of age compared with watching less than an hour a day at 1 year of age.

Problem-solving delays were seen with 2 to less than 4 hours per day (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02-1.92) and for 4 or more per day versus less than 1 hour per day (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.72-4.14). Personal and social skills were more than twice as likely with 4 or more versus less than 1 hour per day.

The significant associations persisted to age 4 for developmental delay in communication (OR 1.64 with 2 to <4 hours/day and OR 2.68 for ≥4 hours/day) and in problem-solving (OR 1.91 for ≥4 hours/day).

"The recent proliferation of digital devices has focused attention on the link between ST [screen time] and child development," Obara further told MedPage Today in an email.

However, he cautioned: "The most important point is that [these] results represent an association, not a causation. So, clinicians and/or parents need not to limit children's' ST based on our results."

Still, it's plausible that screen time might be causally linked to developmental delays, commented Jason Nagata, MD, MSc, of the University of California San Francisco.

"Screens can disrupt or displace interactions with caregivers and limit opportunities for verbal exchanges, which can impair communication and social skills," said Nagata. "Passive screen time, such as mindlessly watching television or videos, may not allow children to practice interactive problem-solving skills. When screen use does not have an interactive or physical component, children are sedentary and may not be able to practice their gross motor skills."

The researchers also pointed to the limit of 1 hour per day of screen time recommended by the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for children ages 2 to 5 years to ensure that they engage in physical activity

opens in a new tab or window and obtain adequate sleep for healthy growth and well-being. The AAP guidelines also call for no screen time before 18 months of age.

But a recent meta-analysisopens in a new tab or window found that only a minority of children meet these guidelines.

The study included 7,097 mother and child pairs among pregnant women at 50 obstetric clinics and hospitals in Japan who were recruited into the study between July 2013 and March 2017.

Children's screen time at 1 year of age was assessed using a questionnaire in which participants were asked the following: "On a typical day, how many hours do you allow your children to watch TV, DVDs, video games, internet games (including mobile phones and tablets), etc?" Five response categories were none, less than 1 hour, 1 to less than 2 hours, 2 to less than 4 hours, or 4 or more hours per day.

To assess developmental delay among children, Obara and colleagues used the Ages & Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition (ASQ-3). The ASQ-3 comprised six questions divided into five domains: communication (babbling, vocalizing, and understanding), gross motor (arm, body, and leg movement), fine motor (hand and finger movement), problem-solving (learning and playing with toys), and personal and social skills (solitary social play and playing with toys and other children).

Slightly more than half of the children included (51.8%) were boys. The largest proportion of kids (48.5%) had less than 1 hour per day of screen time reported, while 29.5% had 1 to less than 2 hours, 17.9% had 2 to less than 4 hours, and 4.1% had 4 or more hours.

Overall, at 2 years of age, developmental delays were observed in communication for 5.1%, gross motor delays for 5.6%, fine motor delays for 4.6%, problem-solving problems for 4.2%, and personal and social skills delays for 5.5%.

Additional findings of the study included that mothers of children with high levels of screen time were characterized as being younger and more often first-time mothers, of lower household income and maternal education level, and having postpartum depression.

A supplemental analysis included 19 children whose parents self-reported that their child had been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder or cerebral palsy by 4 years of age as a factor in the association between screen time and developmental delay. However, estimates did not show any meaningful departure from the main results, they noted.

Obara and colleagues acknowledged the limitation of their study in lack of data to separate educational screen time from other types of screen time. "Doing so may have helped us in examining the association between screen time and child development while considering both positive and negative aspects of screen time," they wrote.

Nagata agreed: "The study grouped all screen time into a single category but not all screen time is equal. For instance, watching educational programs or video chatting with family is not the same as passively watching television or fast-paced TikTok videos."

Nagata told MedPage Today that Obara's study, with which he was not involved, "fills an important gap" in the research by providing several years of follow-up data and using a robust screening measure.

However, parent-reported data for screen time could be inaccurate if parents do not recall or are not aware of all of their children's screen exposures or under-report it, Nagata noted. "Also, the screen time data was initially collected in 2013 and there are newer technologies, devices, and apps that children may be exposed to now in 2023," he added.

Disclosures

The study was supported by grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Obara had no disclosures. A co-author reported receiving grants from the Japanese government during the conduct of the study.

Nagata reported no relevant disclosures.

Primary Source

JAMA Pediatrics

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowTakahashi I, et al "Screen time at age 1 year and communication and problem-solving developmental delay at 2 and 4 years" JAMA Pediatr 2023; DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3057.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/pediatrics/generalpediatrics/105970

Open floodgates at Arizona border allow thousands of migrants to walk into the country

 The door to America is wide open.

Thousands of migrants are flowing across the US border in Arizona every day — literally through open floodgates that have made the Tucson post the busiest point of illegal entry into the country, The Post has learned.

US officials have quizzically welded open 114 massive gates along the Arizona border to allow waters to flow freely during the annual monsoon season and for the migration of an endangered species of antelope, officials said.

But the move is also letting an average of 1,400 migrants from as far off as China casually walk into the country daily — with overwhelmed and outnumbered border agents practically helpless to stop them.

“We thought the agents were going to tell us something,” one Ecuadorean migrant said. “But we just walked in.”

Said another from Cuba: “It was so easy to get into the US.

“Nothing like our journey through Mexico. That part was hard,” she added. “I thought there was going to be more security.”

Video taken by The Post shows a group of around 50 migrants strolling through the opened gates and into the US, with nobody stopping or questioning them.

Smugglers are capitalizing on the floodgate blunder, driving migrants by the busload to the border and dropping them off as if they were casual tourists. Once across, they turn themselves in to border agents and say they are seeking asylum.

Border Patrol agents call them “give-ups.”

Last month, 42,561 migrants were encountered at the Tuscon border post, a huge jump over the June number of 27,294. Tuscon now tops traditionally busier border spots at El Paso and Laredo in Texas, where 24,352 and 26,627 border crossings were reported in July.

“We haven’t seen this many migrants since about 2008,” said Adam Isacson, director for defense oversight at the advocacy group Washington Office on Latin America. “With the end of Title 42, in a way that nobody oversaw, it seems to come back to Tucson.

“What you’re seeing is a lot of large groups who want to turn themselves in,” Isacson said. “Tucson is also traditionally been where smugglers concentrate Mexicans and Central Americans who don’t want to be detected. Now they’re seeing 100 people at a time who are not running away.

“It’s really becoming an epicenter,” he said. “This is big.”

Each of the 114 gates in Arizona, which have been open for nearly two months, has 12-foot doors wide enough for a motorcycle to drive through. Smugglers drive busloads of migrants to the Mexican side of the border, where they get off and simply walk into the US.

Border Patrol sources said the call to open the gates came from several federal agencies, including the National Park Service and the International Boundary and Water Commission.

But because the monsoon season started late this year, they remained open for weeks before there was any rain — allowing migrants a dry path into the US.

“We tried to shut the gates but the order came down that we had to leave them open,” one source said. “You wouldn’t leave the front door of your house open in a bad neighborhood.”

The gates run along a 36-mile stretch near Lukeville, Arizona.

Unlike the largely South American migrants who have been nabbed crossing into Texas, the immigrants coming to Arizona are from throughout the globe, including India, Egypt and China.

And unlike many South American migrants, who are typically disheveled, exhausted and weary from a long and treacherous trek across the barren land, the migrants at Tuscon look more like vacation travelers.

Understaffed border agents can do little to stop the flood.

“Three nights ago a big group of migrants were on the Mexican side,” one source said. “There were two agents on ATVs [all-terrain vehicles] and one line agent trying to stop them from entering. The agents blocked the gates with their quad [bikes]. The cartel guy just started pushing people.

“They rushed the agents. You had people climbing over quads. You had people pushing the agents. Not a single one got charged.”

The Border Patrol is severely understaffed. Agents from across the US were initially offered a $10,000 bonus to move to the remote town of Ajo, Arizona, to beef up the ranks.

Migrants at the US border.
Migrants from as far away as Egypt and China are strolling across the US border in Arizona by the thousands, as federal officials have welded open 114 floodgates for nearly two months, with Border Patrol agents helpless to stop them.
James Breeden/Shutterstock for NY Post
The bonus was upped to $20,000 when only a handful of trainees applied.

“Everything changed since [President Joe Biden] took over,” one source said. “This part of the border wall was built four years ago. Now we’re just letting people through.

“Brutal,” the source added. “No one wants to do this. They [the migrants] commit a federal crime, we charge them, they don’t get convicted. They don’t get sent back. They get a credible fear interview, they get an [asylum] court date years from now.

“We never hear anything more than that. The administration is not going to help us.”

https://nypost.com/2023/08/21/arizona-borders-open-floodgates-allow-thousands-into-us/

'Shareef O’Neal gives update on Bronny James’ basketball future after cardiac arrest'

 Sons of NBA royalty have each other’s back.

Shareef O’Neal, the son of Hall of Famer Shaquille O’Neal, said Bronny James, the son of future Hall of Famer LeBron James, won’t have his career derailed by last month’s cardiac arrest

“Not at all,” O’Neal told TMZ Sports Friday at Los Angeles International Airport. “I don’t think (the cardiac arrest will) affect anything.”

The 23-year-old O’Neal has an idea of what the 18-year-old James is facing with after battling a heart condition which required surgery in 2018 while attending UCLA.

O’Neal said he’s recently talked to James, who is “good.”

James collapsed on July 25 at USC and was unconscious when he was transported to the hospital.

There have been no plans announced for Bronny’s return to the court as USC prepares for the season.

LeBron and Bronny James laughing.
Bronny James, the son of Los Angeles Lakers forward LeBron James, went into cardiac arrest last month.
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Shareef O'Neal on the court.
Shareef O’Neal, son of Hall of Famer Shaquille O’Neal, needed heart surgery in 2018.
NBAE via Getty Images

But at least off the court life seems to be returning to normal with LeBron posting a video of Bronny playing piano in late July.

The family was also spotted for the first time since the cardiac arrest at Santa Monica’s Giorgio Baldi restaurant.

The latest Bronny James sighting came Saturday when he attended the Los Angeles Dodgers’ game against the Miami Marlins with his parents.

Bronny and LeBron James walking.
Bronny James (left) has been making steady progress in his recovery.
PRJ / BACKGRID
Bronny James on the court.
Bronny James is enrolled at USC.
Getty Images

The highlight of the Dodgers’ 3-1 win in the nightcap of a doubleheader at Dodger Stadium came courtesy of All-Star outfielder Mookie Betts.

The former MVP hit a pair of home runs, solo shots in the third and fifth innings, and saluted LeBron each time he crossed the plate.

LeBron tipped his cap to Betts, who’s fourth in the majors with 34 home runs, following the second blast.

LeBron James tips his cap.
The James family attended Saturday’s Marlins-Dodgers game and LeBron James tipped his cap to Mookie Betts following a home run.
London Entertainment / SplashNews.com
Betts and the Dodgers have an 11 1/2-game lead in the NL West, so more trips to the ballpark could be in store for the James family.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/21/update-on-bronny-james-basketball-future-after-cardiac-arrest/