Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

The chaos can only be deliberate

By Victor Davis Hanson

 What Excites Biden?

Things are becoming so strange, so surreal, so nihilistic in contemporary America that the chaos can only be deliberate. Chance, incompetence, and accident could not alone explain the series of disasters we now daily witness that are nearly destroying the country.

When the ailing and non-compos-mentis president now speaks, he rarely becomes excited about Iranian or terrorist provocations. Biden seems restrained even at Russia’s outlawry in Ukraine. The atrocities of Hamas now earn only measured objections from Biden. He does not seem too angered by the collapse of the border. Nor do the deaths of 100,000 Americans to imported fentanyl earn a loud trademark Biden scream.

No, what earns his unchecked ire, often expressed in shouts and hysterical tones, are Donald Trump and his supporters. Most recently, out of nowhere, Biden resurrected the old and proven falsehood that Trump had libeled the Normandy dead as losers and suckers. He then compounded that libel by claiming Trump’s supposed dismissal of the heroic dead was a grievous family insult to his own late son, who did not die either in combat or while in uniform but in 2015, tragically, from brain cancer.

During these anti-Trump fits, Biden wakes up and his face tightens up. He begins screaming, in uncharacteristic, animated fashion, anytime he can smear half the nation’s voters as “semi-fascists” and “ultra-MAGA” extremists. In private, he swears that Trump is a “f—ing asshole” and “sick f—k.” If only Biden substituted “cartel” or “Iran” or “Hamas” for “Trump” or “MAGA.” we might see an animate president.

A Borderless Nation

Meanwhile, a mob of illegal aliens recently tried to kick and stomp sprawled New York peace officers into senselessness—felonies that would earn any such violent citizen a decade or more on Rikers Island.

Yet somehow, only a few were arrested. Stranger still, all of them were immediately let go without bail—as if freeing wolves to prey further upon sheep.

Upon release, a few smirked and flipped their middle fingers to bystanders. Apparently, they wished to show Americans that they are violent, crude, unrepentant, and exempt. And thus they tell us that their newfound hosts are fools for letting the likes of themselves in.

And why not, given the attackers bussed with impunity to California—the land of free everything if only one qualifies as illegally residing in the U.S.

These grotesque bullies are part of the eight-million illegal aliens who pranced across the southern border without background checks—all taking Biden up on his 2019 encouragement to “surge” the border with impunity.

Many brandish their cartel affiliations. Some pay for their transit by smuggling cartel fentanyl, which contributes to 100,000 American overdose deaths per year. Others sport lengthy criminal records. All seemed to have been welcomed out of their countries by conniving Latin American governments and mysteriously invited into our country by our derelict president.

The Death of the Law

There is a continuing pattern here. Sometime around late 2020, Americans woke up in a country they no longer recognized. That summer, tens of thousands of rioters had looted, burned, killed, maimed, and assaulted for four months with veritable impunity. Leftwing mayors and governors dubbed the violence as “largely peaceful” demonstrations or a “summer of love.”

The 2020 legacy of defunding the police and exempting criminals on the basis of their race or ideology is that each week now videos circulate of massive looting, smash-and-grab epidemics, and deadly car-jackings in our major cities. No one cares much about the small business owners who are ruined.

Who laments for the poor who lose their last shopping outlet? Does the Biden administration worry over the terrified employees who are ordered to stand back or the occasional security officer totem instructed to stand down?

Instead, we are to empathize with the thief, the assaulter, the rapist, and the carjacker—at least in the sense that he does not deserve punishment for the mayhem he caused, given we, not he, are supposedly the true guilty parties. A lot of innocent and defenseless people have been assaulted and killed since 2020 as the wage of that toxic theory.

So the subtext of all these violent acts is exemption based on perceived correct race, ideology, or membership in the supposed victim/oppressed binary. The perpetrators are either not arrested, let out the same day as arrested, never charged, or never convicted. And the result is a growing distrust of the law and a cynicism that there is little law anymore, just statutes used against political undesirables.

If, for just one month, the Biden justice department used the same resources and budget it has spent the last three years rounding up bystanders at the January 6 riot and instead prosecuted, convicted, and jailed these big-city violent assailants, then the crime epidemic could be solved.

The Implosion of the University

As a general rule, in 2024, the more “prestigious” our universities, and the more they prided themselves as elite or Ivy-League, the more likely there were racially segregated dorms and graduations, a virtual anti-Semitic hounding of Jewish students, grade inflation, watered-down courses, and pro-Hamas terrorist demonstrations.

For nearly a hundred years, universities told us that the SAT or ACT admittance exam was critical in determining their admissions. It was sold as a way to confirm the potential and preparation necessary to perform at a level demanded by these elite schools. The tests were praised as a meritocratic tool to determine talent by honing grade point averages and allowing opportunity to those without money and contacts. Then suddenly, in 2021, these tests were mostly junked.

That dismissal of standardized tests was a de facto admission that:

1) Universities had been admittedly wrong for a century that standardized admissions tests had any value in determining the degree of student preparation needed to complete a rigorous Ivy League class load.

or 2) in the interest of diversity, equity, and inclusion, the university would now be free to admit students who could not meet their prior unrealistic or unnecessary standards and instead would accommodate new students by suddenly inflating grades, introducing easier classes, or diminishing required course work.

Of course, the university admits to neither of these realities. It compounds the deception and fraud by claiming new generations of students are more competitive and gifted than ever and will leave with degrees that guarantee employers rigorously trained graduates. Time will soon tell.

The End of Deterrence

The same nihilism characterizes our foreign policy.

Our worst enemies could not have planned a more disastrous and humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan than the Biden administration’s August 2021 scamper. We simply, without an afterthought, abandoned billions of dollars of sophisticated weapons to Taliban terrorists.

We left behind a $1 billion new embassy and a remodeled Air Force base. We bragged about taking out terrorists with a “righteous strike” that wiped out an entire friendly Afghan family, while 13 American service personnel were blown up trying to secure a non-securable escape route.

Then followed the mysterious laxity as a Chinese spy balloon lazily traversed the U.S. with impunity. Next was the radical drop-off in military recruitment. If one wished to ensure that the one group that serves—and dies—in combat units at twice its demographics would exit the military en masse, prompting an enlistment crisis, the Pentagon could not have done a better job.

The top brass all but accused its white male recruits of being prone to toxic white supremacy, only to form a task force to root it out—and then discover such rage and hatred never existed in the first place.

It nonetheless drummed out 8,400 veterans for not receiving the mRNA vaccinations, many of whom had naturally acquired immunity and real doubts about the efficacy or safety of the inoculations. And, finally, the Pentagon made it known that prior standards of recruitment, promotion, and evaluation had apparently weakened the military. Therefore, new race- and gender-based criteria would ensure fewer and now unneeded white males in positions of rank and influence.

Abroad, China serially threatens to annex Taiwan. A hungry and perennially restless Vladimir Putin once upon a time thought he was restrained from invading his neighbors by fear of more costs incurred than the likelihood of benefits to be gained. But like an earlier reaction to a weakened U.S. in 2008 and 2014, Putin assumed that the 2022 Biden administration would likely do little if he annexed greater swaths of Ukraine. And so he invaded.

National security advisor Jack Sullivan, on the eve of the October 7 Hamas massacres of Jewish citizens, claimed the Middle East was at last calm. Now it is on the verge of a theater-wide war, once Iran sensed that the Biden team would appease and beg it to behave.

So the Biden administration was eager to end oil sanctions, plead with Iran to reenter the Iran Deal, remove the Houthis from terrorist designations, route billions of dollars to Tehran for hostages, junk the Abrams accords, and restore millions of dollars in please-be-nice bribe money to the Palestinians.

Biden’s abject misreading of human nature has ensured that a thuggish theocracy that slaughters abroad and tortures at home would interpret that reproachment as either naiveté or stupidity. And thus it would respond with contempt and escalating aggression. And so it has.

Somehow, over just three years, the Biden administration did to the Middle East what it did to the southern border: blew it up in the same exact manner of mindlessly undoing any policy that had previously worked with Trump’s finger prints on them.

What Is Going On?

What is the common denominator, what is the rationale behind the anarchy, and what is the reason why a president would so willingly rend the fabric of America?

Why would the government privilege the illegal alien over the law-abiding citizen? The violent pro-Hamas, anti-Semitic foreign-born protestor over the peaceful pro-Israel, U.S. citizen? The smash-and-grabber over the dutiful security guard?

We are nearing a French Revolution, reign-of-terror moment. The law seems to be what a cabal of hardcore leftists who control the Oval Office say it is.

Joe Biden’s administration offers no better confirmation of warnings from Thucydides to Thomas Hobbes that the veneer of civilization is precious, hard-won, quite thin, and beneath it churns innate human savagery and chaos roaring to be released.

So why did Biden unleash the hounds of anti-civilization? Did he despise the supposedly boring middle-class citizen who follows the law, pays all his taxes, and never gets arrested? Does he hate the idea of meritocracy? In Biden’s puppeteers’ dangerous calculus, is all this savagery and chaos a deliberate mechanism to ensure parity? Equity? Inclusion?

So is the deliberate nihilism—economic, social, cultural, social, and political—a way of leveling the field? Making life difficult for the more successful? Making those who cherish the traditions and protocols of America pay?

Is that the plan to take the country to near collapse, and then only at the abyss itself to force revolutionary change—or else?

How else can anyone explain the descent of our city downtowns into dank medieval cesspits, our notion of male and female transformed into the sexual circus right out of Petronius’s Satyricon, our race relations into a mixture of Rwanda and Yugoslavia, and our universities into Soviet-like “People’s Universities of Correct Thought?”

None of this was by accident. It is the dividend of a philosophy that says, “We have to blow up your America before we can reboot it for us.”

https://amgreatness.com/2024/02/05/is-biden-malicious-incompetent-or-conniving/

House Republicans sue FBI agent for bucking censorship investigation

 The House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit against a longtime FBI agent on Tuesday for refusing to comply with a subpoena, accusing the agent of hindering the committee’s investigation into social media censorship practices by declining to appear for a deposition.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., stated that California-based Assistant Special Agent in Charge Elvis Chan defied the subpoena at the direction of the Department of Justice, which disagreed with the committee’s rules for depositions and interviews.

At the heart of the dispute is the demand from Chan and his employer that he be accompanied during his deposition with the committee by both his personal counsel and government counsel. The committee has long maintained that it allows one or the other to appear with witnesses, but not both.

The committee alleged in the suit that the DOJ’s position has “no legal merit,” citing the “Constitution’s clear command that each chamber of Congress ‘may determine the Rules of its Proceedings.'”

The complaint seeks to force Chan to testify before the committee immediately.

Chan, the committee wrote, is a “pivotal figure” in its investigation into allegations that the federal government overstepped its authority by coercing social media companies, including Meta, X, and YouTube, to censor content that often suppressed right-leaning viewpoints.

“Chan described himself as ‘one of the primary people with pass-through information,’ information that the companies used when deciding whether to restrict online content,” the committee wrote.

Chan was also deposed as a witness in Missouri v. Biden, a case in which two Republican state attorneys general alleged that the federal government violated the First Amendment when it pressured social media companies to censor speech, such as content related to COVID-19, Hunter Biden’s laptop, and election-related matters. Chan participated in regular “industry meetings” with the companies as part of an effort to combat “malign foreign-influence activities,” according to a memorandum in the case.

Chan “led a team of other FBI agents who regularly communicated with social media companies about ‘disinformation,'” the committee wrote in its lawsuit.

A judge in the Missouri v. Biden case issued a preliminary injunction against the Biden administration last year, ordering it to halt certain communication with social media companies. The Supreme Court has since taken up the case, and that order is on pause while the high court reviews it.

The committee’s lawsuit came as expected after it signaled last September in a lengthy social media post that negotiations with Chan, the DOJ, and the FBI had been unproductive and that communication among the various parties involved had grown tense.

At the time, the DOJ sent a letter to the committee, obtained by the Washington Examiner, citing a Trump-era policy position that deemed attempts to exclude department lawyers from certain depositions unconstitutional.

“A congressional subpoena that purports to compel testimony on matters within the scope of an agency employee’s official duties, including potentially privileged information, without the presence of agency counsel is without legal effect and cannot constitutionally be enforced,” Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte wrote.

The FBI also said at the time that the committee’s position “was a significant departure from normal procedures and an unnecessary escalation of this Committee’s treatment of FBI officials.”

The FBI declined to comment on the lawsuit and noted the bureau does not typically comment on litigation.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/2839382/house-republicans-sue-fbi-agent-censorship-investigation/

More Americans are getting a second job to offset sting of high inflation

 The constant presence of high inflation is pushing more Americans to take on a side hustle as the cost of everyday necessities continues to rise.

The Labor Department reported on Friday that nearly 8.13 million people held multiple jobs in January – up from 7.87 million one year ago. In total, they represent about 5.1% of the total U.S. workforce, an increase from 5% just one year ago.

The growing likelihood of Americans holding more than one job comes as they continue to confront stubbornly high inflation that has rapidly eroded their purchasing power.

In fact, the government reported last month that the average hourly earnings for all employees was $11.10 in December, which represents a 2.89% decline from the $11.43 figure in January 2021, shortly before the inflation crisis began. 

An "inflation relief" sale in Miami

A window display at The Vacation Supply Company on Collins Ave. in Miami Beach, Florida. (Photo by: Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images / Getty Images)

By that measure, the typical U.S. worker is worse off today than two years ago, even though nominal wages are rising at the fastest pace in years. 

Inflation has created severe financial pressures for most U.S. households, which are forced to pay more for everyday necessities like food and rent. The burden is disproportionately borne by low-income Americans, whose already-stretched paychecks are heavily impacted by price fluctuations. 

placeholder

While inflation has fallen considerably from a peak of 9.1% notched during June 2022, it remains well above the Federal Reserve's 2% goal. Additionally, when compared with January 2021, prices are up a stunning 17.6%.

The cost of necessities like food, gasoline, rent and child care remain far more expensive than they were just one year ago. Chronically high prices are forcing Americans to spend about $650 more per month than they did two years ago, according to a recent estimate from Moody's Analytics.

A gas station off in the distance

Gas prices are listed at a station in Los Angeles, California, on July 19, 2022.  (FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Food prices are up 33.7% from the start of 2021, while shelter costs are up 18.7%, according to FOX Business calculations. Energy prices, meanwhile, are up 32.8%.

"People are experiencing high prices. If you think about the basic necessities like bread and milk and eggs and meats of various kinds, prices are substantially higher than they were before the pandemic," Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Sunday during an interview with "60 Minutes." 

As they spend more on everyday goods, Americans are burning through their savings, and are increasingly turning to credit cards to cover those basic expenses.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/more-americans-are-getting-second-job-offset-sting-high-inflation

Dismal NBC Approval Poll Shows Biden's Chances Of Reelection Plummeting

 Did Joe Biden really have the numbers in 2023 to beat Donald Trump as some surveys indicated?  If he did, he certainly doesn't have them in 2024.  The polls are increasingly ugly for Democrats - public approval for the Biden Administration has hit the lowest levels in modern presidential history next to Jimmy Carter (a man who also mismanaged a stagflationary crisis).  Even the corporate media has been forced to acknowledge that things don't look so good for “the big guy.”  

NBC has released its latest survey, which indicates a growing lead for Donald Trump in the general election (Trump 47% vs Biden 42%), but Trump also has a dramatic edge over Biden in most public issue categories.  On the economy, 55% of respondents preferred Trump vs 33% for Biden.  On border security, 57% wanted Trump and only 22% thought Biden would do a better job.  In dealing with crime, 48% would vote Trump vs. 32% for Biden.  And, when asked which candidate was more competent and mentally capable, 48% said Trump vs 32% for Biden.

A smaller percentage of people in each category chose the option of “not sure.”

NBC polling continues to observe an accelerating decline for Joe Biden in terms of public perception on a host of top concerns.  This seems to mirror his overall low approval rating which just dropped again to 37%

Democrats have taken to social media recently to demand answers, racking their brains trying to figure out why Biden's brand is sinking faster than Bud Light.    

Extremely low voter turnout for the Democratic Primaries (only 4% of Democrats were interested this year) is not necessarily an indication of how many Dems will show up at the ballot box (or mail box) in November.  However, the stagflationary crisis, the draconian covid lockdowns, unnecessary tensions with Russia and the border crisis that Biden created by erasing numerous Trump era measures have left the American public with a sour taste in their mouths.

People are less inclined to forget government trespasses than political think tanks seem to realize.  They're definitely not going to overlook 30%-plus higher prices on most goods and services since 2020.  One must truly struggle to think of a single positive result of Biden's last three years.  Even the low unemployment rate is mired in the suspicious creative math used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the public just isn't buying it.   

One could argue that the election of 2024 isn't about which candidate is loved; it's about which candidate is less hated or mistrusted.  Under these conditions, Trump clearly wins.  Others would point out that ongoing national and global instability might disrupt the elections or throw them into disarray (as we witnessed when the covid pandemic struck in the middle of election season 2020 and mail-in ballots became a mainstay).  

If this is the case, the Biden Administration would be a primary beneficiary.  As it turns out, the long running propaganda campaign to demonize conservatives may have had the opposite effect to what Democrats intended.  Biden might need more than another overnight miracle in November to keep his seat in the Oval Office.   

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/dismal-nbc-approval-poll-shows-bidens-chances-reelection-plummeting

Moderna Scientists Warn mRNA Vaccines Carry Toxicity Risks

  by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The technology used in Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine carries toxicity risks, scientists with the company said in a new paper.

A major challenge now is how to efficiently de-risk potential toxicities associated with mRNA technology,” the scientists wrote in the paper, which was published by Nature Reviews Drug Discovery on Jan. 23.

The Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 shots use modified messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology. The mRNA is delivered by lipid nanoparticles (LNP).

The toxicity risks include “lipid nanoparticle structural components, production methods, route of administration and proteins produced from complexed mRNAs,” the authors of the paper said.

Authors of the paper include Eric Jacquinet and Dimitrios Bitounis, Moderna employees, and Maximillian Rogers, who was working at Moderna when the paper was being done.

Moderna didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The mRNA vaccines have multiple known side effects, including heart inflammation and severe allergic shock. Those may stem from hypersensitivity reactions, which can be elicited by “any LNP-mRNA component” but are most likely triggered by PEGlyated lipid nanoparticles, which is “the most potentially reactogenic component,” the scientists said.

Polyethylene glycol, or PEG, an ingredient in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, is known to cause allergic reactions. Outside scientists are divided over the mechanism behind the heart inflammation, while Pfizer has posited that the LNPs are behind the issue.

The new paper drew from prior publications and other data. The authors didn’t carry out any new experiments.

Some of the papers cited included those that have found mRNA and the spike protein delivered by Moderna’s shot in various parts of human beings weeks or months after vaccination, despite health officials claiming when the vaccines were rolled out that such materials would exit the body within days.

The scientists said that Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine is “safe and effective” and hailed the development of an updated shot as “demonstrat[ing] the rapid timeline for modifications with mRNA technology in the clinic.” Due to the “transient nature of mRNA,” though, “repeat administration may be necessary,” they said.

The scientists added later that reducing risks of toxicities with mRNA-based vaccines and drugs is necessary but “complicated.” That can be accomplished through a multi-pronged approach that includes advanced testing in laboratories and adjusts preclinical, animal trials to better account for “differences in human and animal physiology.”

Moderna and other companies are currently testing a number of new mRNA products, including influenza vaccines and cancer treatments.

“Thanks to the mRNA platform we built, we have an exciting pipeline, with up to 15 launches in the next five years,” Stephane Bancel, Moderna’s CEO, told investors in the company’s most recent earnings call.

The paper’s corresponding author, Mansoor Amiji of Northeastern University’s Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chemical Engineering, referred a request for comment to Mr. Bitounis, who didn’t provide any answers.

Dr. Malone Reacts

Dr. Robert Malone, who helped invent the mRNA technology, said the paper downplayed the range of risks that have been linked to the mRNA-based vaccines and may be part of a limited hangout, or a propaganda technique.

That technique, a form of misdirection, involves people offering some information to obscure or prevent the discovery of other information.

“My most generous interpretation of the overall intent of the article is that this article summarizes and represents information concerning risks and toxicities of this platform technology which Moderna wishes to have disclosed in a manner which puts the firm, its activities and the underlying platform technology in the best possible light,” Dr. Malone, who wasn’t involved with the paper, wrote in his review.

“A less generous interpretation of intent is that this article represents a subtle form of propaganda strategy commonly referred to as a limited hangout.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/moderna-scientists-warn-mrna-vaccines-carry-toxicity-risks

Kudlow: President Ronald Reagan taught me optimism

Today is Ronald Reagan's 113th birthday. He was born on February 6, 1911. Thereby, making 1911 one of the greatest all-time years in American history because Reagan was one of our greatest presidents.

He reversed America's declining economy and stature around the world. He restored the idea of freedom. You could say he was the first "Make America Great" president in nearly a century. Take a listen: 

RONALD REAGAN: "Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction." 

There's way too much you can write praising Ronald Reagan, but let me throw out a few historic snippets in honor of his birthday. Reagan's foreign policy was aimed squarely at defeating Soviet communism and he succeeded. Peace through strength. We win, they lose. Tear down this wall. 

Reagan wouldn't even talk to Soviet leaders in his first term, because of their bad behavior and because many of them were dying off anyway. In a second term, he did meet with Mikhail Gorbachev and basically said he'd never give up so-called "Star Wars" technology that protected us against Soviet or other enemy missiles. 

The liberal media laughed at it, but today it's an absolute cornerstone of our national security policy. On a live radio program, he once warmed up by saying we will bomb Moscow in fifteen seconds. Then he, of course, said "just kidding." Was he? Communists were afraid of him. Reagan understood the integration of economic and national security. 

Regan slashed taxes and deregulated the economy, while working with Paul Volcker to slay double-digit inflation. He re-awakened the supply side of the economy, rescued the faltering dollar and showed how strong growth and a stable currency were able to bring down sky-rocketing prices and boost middle-class wages. 

placeholder

While Reagan's rejuvenated economy was growing better than 5% during the 80's, at one point the recovery from Jimmy Carter's recession was running about 12%. The Soviet Union's Gorbachev realized that he could never match America's production of defense and civilian goods and, if Gorbachev tried to bluff, Reagan wouldn't let him. 

So, the Soviets folded. Essentially not a shot was fired. Strong at home, strong abroad, a big Reagan lesson. Reagan tried to drain the Washington, D.C. swamp. He wasn't always successful, but the East Coast establishment and the elites didn't like him, one bit. Listen to this: 

RONALD REAGAN: "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’" 

Sound familiar? Working folks flocked into the Reagan-led GOP. Here's a guy who not only whipped the Soviets, but filled their lunch pails to overflowing. I was an associate director in Reagan's Office of Management and Budget during his first term and loved it. 

There was some limited face time with a couple of Cabinet presentations, sitting along the back wall at some other cabinet meetings and The Gipper gave me a little medal when I said "goodbye" to him in the Oval Office. 

One thing above all he taught me: optimism. America is the greatest country in the history of history and, even when it occasionally seems broken, it can be fixed very fast, with the right principles and policies. 

Happy Birthday, Mr. President. 

https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/larry-kudlow-president-ronald-reagan-taught-me-optimism

House Fails To Impeach Mayorkas After Four Republicans Join Democrats

 House lawmakers on Tuesday failed to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, under whose tenure more than 10 million illegal immigrants have entered the US - doubling the existing population.

Three Republicans voted with House Democrats - while a fourth, Blake Moore (R-UT) flipped his "Aye" to a "No" in order to preserve the ability to bring 'Motions to Reconsider' (which can only be brought by someone who voted 'no').

The open-border Republicans who voted against impeachment are:

  • Ken Buck (CO)
  • Tom McClintonck (CA)
  • Mike Gallagher (WI)

In a Monday op-ed in The Hill, Buck said that while Mayorkas may be incompetent, his behavior wasn't impeachable, and that doing so would set a bad precedent.

Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO)

The vote to impeach Mayorkas was held as a bipartisan effort in the Senate to send $60 billion to Ukraine and lock in 1.5 million illegal migrants per year unraveled.

In the articles of impeachment, Mayorkas was accused of demonstrating a "willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law," and "breaching the public trust," which Democrats suggested was nothing more than disagreements over policy or performance failings, but not impeachable crimes.

The border has become a central concern of Congress and the White House, as arrests hit records in recent months. Border Patrol agents in December set a monthly record of nearly 250,000 arrests of migrants caught crossing the border illegally, up 31% from November, with daily arrests sometimes topping 10,000. An additional 50,000 migrants entered the country in December at legal border crossings to seek asylum. 

Democrats said the effort to impeach Mayorkas amounted to political theater at the start of a heated presidential-election campaign in which immigration is expected to be a top issue for voters. -WSJ

According to Rep. Mark Green (R-TN), Mayorkas "is the very type of public official the Framers feared—someone who would cast aside the laws passed by a co-equal branch of government, replacing those with his own preferences."

On Monday, the White House said that impeaching Mayorkas "would be an unprecedented and unconstitutional act of political retribution that would do nothing to solve the challenges our nation faces in securing the border," and suggested that he's been a great DHS secretary.

If the House had succeeded in impeaching Mayorkas, he would have been the second cabinet secretary in US history to be impeached.

With friends like these, who needs enemies?

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/house-fails-impeach-mayorkas-after-four-republicans-join-democrats