Search This Blog

Sunday, April 21, 2024

New anti-Israel tent city takes over Columbia U days after NYPD raid as activists vow to stay ‘forever’

 A massive new anti-Israel tent city took over Columbia University on Sunday, just days after an NYPD raid cleared another intrusive encampment there and cuffed more than 100 protesters.

At least 30 tents were sprawled across the Manhattan Ivy League school’s West Lawn along with piles of food and supplies as embattled university officials struggled to contain the growing crisis.

The upheaval and threats to Jewish students have become so intolerable that a prominent rabbi at the prestigious school urged them Sunday to stay home — and university officials told them they could take classes online.

“We are looking for our demands, and we are going to continue that,” an encampment protester defiantly told The Post on Sunday. “We are here forever. We’re here as long as [it takes till] Columbia meets our demands.

Anti-Israel demonstrators create another encampment on the lawn of Columbia University on Sunday.James Keivom
The protesters returned to Columbia University to take over its sprawling green West Lawn.James Keivom
“This has been going on for five days, this is Day 5,” the rallier said of the latest protest, which is urging among other things that the university divest from Israel.

“There are people sleeping here, we eat our meals here. The people who are fortunate enough to not have gotten suspended, they also go home to get more materials. We have runners. They are grabbing us stuff and being very supportive,” she said.

“We have an entire community here that’s willing to help us. This is a community, it’s a camaraderie.”

As she spoke, some of the protesters sat on sleeping bags, while others stretched out on yoga mats and blue tarps, making signs and drinking coffee, water and juice while munching on fruit and Middle Eastern pastries.

The university insists it will not tolerate the protesters camping out in front of its library.LP Media

Speeches were also being made about divestment around her, and chanting could be heard elsewhere.

Anti-Israeli students previously took over part of the campus last week, erecting about 60 tents while covering the grounds with Palestinian flags and antisemitic slogans.

The tent city sprouted up even after university President Minouche Shafik vowed to crack down on antisemitism.

On Thursday, NYPD cops in riot gear then moved in and raided the unkempt encampment, hauling away at least 108 protesters — some who had to be carried away — and clearing the area of tents and supplies stashed by students.

A placard at the tent city reminds activists about “staying focused.”LP Media
Activists camping out say there is a feeling of “camaraderie.”James Keivom

But less than 24 hours later, dozens of students started returning to the grounds near the Butler Library, hitting their stride Sunday.

Despite social-media reports that Columbia would allow the tents to remain for a week, a university rep told The Post on Sunday that students “do not have permission to set up tents on the lawn.

“Those who do are in violation of long-standing university policy and will be identified and subjected to disciplinary action,” the representative said.

Asked if students would have the option of virtual classes, a school source said “guidance” has been handed down saying, “All schools and programs should permit the option of remote learning — and when possible, assessment — to students who are seeking academic accomadations due to campus activity for either religious reasons or other approved disability accommodations reasons.”

The campus — and others around the nation — have been hotbeds of antisemitic protests since Hamas terrorists pulled off a sneak attack on Israel on Oct. 7, with the Jewish state responding with a counter-offensive that has killed thousands in the Gaza Strip.

Jewish students say they are afraid to be on campus during such demonstrations.LP Media
The show of blatant support for Hamas on American college campuses has rattled some students, particularly Jewish students.

“There is an atmosphere of concern and fear on campus,” a Columbia co-ed told The Post on Sunday. “Depends on who you are — racism, surveillance, fear of being spotted or photographed. A general paranoia. Some exams have been postponed and papers extended.”

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/new-anti-israel-tent-city-takes-over-columbia-university-we-are-here-forever/

Biden's Title IX Trans-formation Puts Women's Progress & Protections "On The Chopping Block"

 by Savannah Hulsey Pointer via The Epoch Times,

The Biden administration’s overhaul of Title IX met with pushback today from lawmakers in favor of preserving female-only spaces.

Among the dissenters was Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), who serves as the Education and the Workforce Committee Chair. Ms. Foxx asserted that the Department of Education’s final Title IX rule puts a radical agenda of left-wing ideologues over the safety of women and girls.

“The Department of Education has placed Title IX, and the decades of advancement and protections for women and girls that it has yielded, squarely on the chopping block,” Ms. Foxx said in a press release from the committee.

On April 19, the rule overhauling Title IX was finalized by the Biden administration. As a result, universities and colleges nationwide have only a few months to revise their policies regarding the handling of sex discrimination complaints in light of the expanded definition of sex.

The Title IX Act, which is federal legislation, explicitly forbids any form of sex discrimination in funded educational programs or activities, including sexual harassment and sexual violence.

The new rule defines sexual harassment as including harassment based on sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

In her castigation of the changes, Ms. Foxx went on to say:

“This final rule dumps kerosene on the already raging fire that is Democrats’ contemptuous culture war that aims to radically redefine sex and gender.

“The rule also undermines existing due process rights, placing students and institutions in legal jeopardy and again undermining the protections Title IX is intended to provide. Evidently, the acceptance of biological reality and the faithful implementation of the law are just pills too big for the Department to swallow—and it shows.”

According to the U.S. Department of Education, this redefining of sex is intended to be in accordance with the logic of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Bostock v. Clayton County, which was issued in 2020. In that case, a child welfare worker was purportedly terminated after his employer discovered that he was gay.

In its decision, which was reached by a vote of 6–3, the Supreme Court provided a broad interpretation of Title VII, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. The court came to the conclusion that it is unconstitutional to take into consideration sexual orientation and gender identity when making employment choices.

U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona said in an April 19 press release, announcing the change:

“For more than 50 years, Title IX has promised an equal opportunity to learn and thrive in our nation’s schools free from sex discrimination.

“These final regulations build on the legacy of Title IX by clarifying that all our nation’s students can access schools that are safe, welcoming, and respect their rights.”

On his first day in office, President Joe Biden issued a comprehensive executive order that directed all federal agencies to apply the Bostock framework to all of their operations, including Title IX enforcement. This was despite the fact that Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion that Bostock would only narrowly apply to Title VII.

“Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports,” President Biden’s day-one order stated.

“Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes.”

The department’s new rule does not address the issue of transgender athletes competing in high school and college sports, which is now the subject of a rule-making process that is still ongoing. It is considered improbable that a comprehensive sports rule will be established before the general election later this year.

The White House did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’s request for comment.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/bidens-title-ix-trans-formation-puts-womens-progress-protections-chopping-block

15 State Officials Warn Bank Of America About 'De-Banking' Of Christians

 by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,

A group of 15 financial officials from 13 states sent a notice to Bank of America, raising concerns about the institution’s “de-banking” of Christians.

“We write to express our concerns over Bank of America’s troubling track record of politicized de-banking. Bank of America’s de-banking policies and practices threaten the company’s financial health, its reputation with customers, our nation’s economy, and the civil liberties of everyday Americans,” the officials wrote in an April 18 letter to Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan.

We are especially troubled by Bank of America’s track record of discriminating against religious ministries. Notable examples include Memphis-based charity Indigenous Advance Ministries, the Timothy Two Project, and Christian author and speaker Lance Wallnau.”

In April 2023, Bank of America shut down the account of Indigenous Advance Ministries, which partners with groups in the African nation of Uganda to provide care and education for orphaned and at-risk children. The bank closed accounts of a Memphis church which donated to the organization.

Bank of America provided “vague reasons” for the closure of these accounts, claiming the organization’s activities exceeded the institution’s “risk tolerance” and that it no longer wanted to serve its “business type.”

“Months later—after being confronted by an international media organization—the bank then claimed that it closed the accounts because the for-profit business engaged in ‘debt collection.’ Neither Indigenous Advance Ministries nor the church collect debts, nor was the bank able to point to any policy prohibiting account holders from engaging in such activities,” the letter said.

“In other words that rationale was a ruse, and even if legitimate, would only apply to one of the closed accounts.”

In 2020, the bank closed the account of Timothy Two Project International, which trains pastors in more than 65 nations. In a letter to the group, the bank claimed the closure was due to Timothy Two operating “a business type we have chosen not to service.”

The financial institution also froze the accounts of author Mr. Wallnau, alleging he was suspected of money laundering. However, the bank failed to provide any evidence supporting such accusations.

While the bank eventually unfroze the account, they required Mr. Wallnau to answer a series of invasive questions.

“This pattern of religious de-banking strongly suggests that systemic drivers of religious and political bias may be at work within Bank of America,” the letter said.

“One objective indicator of such a problem is the bank’s egregiously low score on the Viewpoint Diversity Score Business Index, the premier benchmark for measuring corporate respect for free speech and religious freedom. Bank of America scored a meager 8 percent out of a possible 100 percent.”

The letter pointed out that Bank of America’s vague terms of service allow them to deny services for political or religious views. For instance, the company’s policy says it can refuse services to clients deemed to “promote intolerance … or hate.”

This policy can be weaponized by the bank against clients who express certain views, which are protected by the First Amendment, the officials wrote.

“Bank of America funds and partners with anti-free speech organizations like the Human Rights Campaign and the Center for American Progress while preventing employees from giving to faith-based groups in their employee gift match program.”

Bank of America, being the second largest bank in the nation and a recipient of a host of government subsidies, is obligated to ensure equal access to marketplace for all Americans and “not play politics,” officials wrote.

The letter was written by officials from Alabama, Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Utah.

They demanded that the institution implement certain recommendations, including eliminating “existing viewpoint discriminatory terms” governing customers, updating its terms of service to include a commitment to not discriminate on the basis of religion or politics, and taking part in a survey to assess how the bank’s policies impact the civil liberties of its customers.

The Epoch Times reached out to the bank for comment.

De-banking of Conservatives

The issue of de-banking conservatives has been a hot topic in recent years. A November 2022 statement signed by 60 financial professionals alleged that banks like JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Capital One, and Morgan Stanley were engaged in political or religious discrimination.

“JP Morgan Chase refused to process payments for a GOP-aligned organization,” it said.

In addition, the bank “shuttered the National Committee for Religious Freedom’s account without explanation, demanding that the nonprofit disclose its donors and provide a list of the political candidates it intends to support as a condition of resuming service.”

Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley refused to do business with organizations that raised “significant human rights, environmental, health, and safety or social responsibility issues.”

Similarly, credit behemoth Visa mandated that merchants do not use its services in any manner deemed “hateful.”

“What these vague, unspecified terms mean in practice is subject to the arbitrary interpretation of each of your companies, or any one of thousands of employees charged with enforcing them,” the statement said.

“Policies like these place customers and clients at risk of being ‘debanked’ simply because a company employee disagrees with their point of view on any number of contentious social issues.”

Meanwhile, states are taking action to end financial discrimination against conservatives by the banking industry.

Iowa earlier this year introduced Senate Study Bill 3094, which bans financial institutions from discriminating against customers using a “social credit score.”

The bill defines “social credit score” as any evaluation of a person’s “speech, religious exercise, association, expression, or conduct protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.”

If a financial institution is found violating the law, the attorney general can bring a civil action against the institution. A court can order the institution to pay damages, restitution, or other compensation.

In February, State Rep. Jason Zachary (R-Tenn.) introduced a similar bill in Tennessee. “This legislation prohibits the 20 largest banks in our country from denying financial services to any Tennessean based on political speech, religious belief, or a social credit score,” he said at a state House Banking and Consumer Affairs Committee hearing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/15-state-officials-warn-bank-america-about-de-banking-christians

New York governor reaches deal to keep SUNY Downstate open

 New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has reached a deal with state legislature to keep University Hospital at Downstate in New York City's Brooklyn borough open.

The new deal will also preserve SUNY Downstate's essential healthcare services, secure long-term financial stability and formalize the community engagement process, a spokesperson for Ms. Hochul said in a statement shared with Becker's

"The state budget’s historic investment in Downstate will allow this critical institution to fulfill this mission, grow outpatient healthcare services, and tackle systemic health inequities in the community we serve," a spokesperson for SUNY Downstate said in a statement shared with Becker's.

SUNY Downstate shared plans to significantly shrink or possibly close in January. The plans were met with backlash from community members, including United University Professions, a higher education union that represents more than 2,300 SUNY Downstate workers. 

"It is clear that Downstate is a vital resource to the community and must remain open," Fred Kowal, PhD, president of UUP, said in an April 19 news release. "We look forward to working with our community, health care, labor, and government partners to ensure SUNY Downstate Hospital remains a pillar of the Central Brooklyn community for years to come."

In February, Ms. Hochul shared 2025 budget plans to allot $300 million in capital funding for SUNY Downstate and up to $100 million in funding for operations. 

"The Budget will also formalize the existing community engagement process by establishing an advisory board for the modernization and revitalization of SUNY Downstate," the spokesperson for Ms. Hochul said regarding budget background. 

More information regarding the deal will be included in the final budget bills. 

"I'm proud to have led the fight to protect Downstate hospital and develop a real plan to address the glaring health inequities in Central Brooklyn," New York Sen. Zellnor Myrie said in a statement shared with Becker's

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/new-york-governor-reaches-deal-to-keep-suny-downstate-open.html