Search This Blog

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Trump expected to sign executive order abolishing the Department of Education as soon as Thursday

 President Trump is set to sign an executive order to eradicate the Department of Education as early as Thursday, according to a report.

Trump will reportedly use his executive powers to direct Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Education Department” based on “the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law,” according to the Wall Street Journal, which viewed the drafted order.

“The experiment of controlling American education through Federal programs and dollars–and the unaccountable bureaucrats those programs and dollars support–has failed our children, our teachers, and our families,” the draft order, which was labeled as “pre-decisional,” reads.

President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference in the East Room of the White House on Feb. 27, 2025.Getty Images

The order – which supports the president’s pledge to have the federal agency shuttered – has been in the works since Trump’s transition, the outlet reported.

The White House did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

McMahon, 76, who was confirmed along party lines Monday, cited the commander in chief’s upcoming move in an email to staffers mere hours after she was approved to head the department, the outlet reported, saying she would “send education back to the states.”

The World Wrestling Entertainment co-founder added that Trump and the American voters “tasked us with accomplishing the elimination of the bureaucratic bloat here at the Education Department – a momentous final mission – quickly and responsibly,” the outlet reported.

The 78-year-old president has also made no bones about his plans for the Education Department, telling reporters last month he hoped his nominee would “put herself out of a job.”

Linda McMahon meets in the Russell Senate Office Building on Dec. 9. 2024.Getty Images

On the campaign trail, Trump regularly told supporters and reporters that he wanted to get back into office to eliminate the federal department – telling Time Magazine in December that he initially planned for at least a “virtual closure” of the agency. 

“We will drain the government education swamp and stop the abuse of your taxpayer dollars to indoctrinate America’s youth with all sorts of things that you don’t want to have our youth hearing,” he said at a September rally in Wisconsin.

When he tapped McMahon to lead the department last November, Trump indicated that she would be tasked with giving states a larger role in education policy. 

Republicans in Congress have also pointed to the abysmal national test scores as proof that the Department of Education, which spent about $268 billion last year, needs a major shake-up with McMahon at the helm.

Linda McMahon testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on her nomination to be Education Secretary on Capitol Hill on Feb. 13, 2025.AFP via Getty Images
Trump delivers his address to a joint session of Congress at the US Capitol on March 4, 2025.Getty Images

The US currently ranks 20th out of 41 nations in education, according to an analysis by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, falling beneath Canada and many European countries.

American students’ test scores have also plummeted since the closure of classrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic — with reading proficiency for eighth-graders notching its lowest level in the 32 years the government has compiled such data.

McMahon herself has played coy about unilaterally dismantling the department.

She told members of the Senate HELP Committee in her confirmation hearing that the department’s elimination “certainly does require Congressional action” but there are plans to get buy-in from Republican lawmakers.

McMahon stands with several then-nominees to Trump’s administration at inauguration ceremonies in the Capitol Rotunda on Jan. 20, 2025.via REUTERS
The US currently ranks 20th out of 41 nations in education, according to an analysis by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, falling beneath Canada and many European countries.AFP via Getty Images

“We’d like to make sure that we are presenting a plan that I think our senators could get on board with, and our Congress could get on board with, that would have a better-functioning Department of Education,” she said.

Key programs involving Title I funding for low-income institutions, as well as Pell Grants and Public Service Loan Forgiveness will remain in place, McMahon promised.

McMahon also said she stood ready to abide by executive actions preventing transgender athletes from competing on women’s sports teams, cracking down on antisemitism on university campuses and abolishing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs.

Congressional Democrats have characterized Trump’s plans for the Education Department as an effort to “destroy” public schools for the benefit of billionaires who can buy up the nation’s educational institutions.

https://nypost.com/2025/03/05/us-news/trump-expected-to-sign-executive-order-abolishing-the-department-of-education/

Frack, Kathy, frack or New York will continue to be held over an energy barrel by Canada

 New York wouldn’t have to worry so much about the risk to its energy imports from a possible US-Canada trade war if Gov. Kathy Hochul had embraced fracking for natural gas, rather than declaring war on carbon-based fuels.

Monthly gas bills in New York City are roughly 15% higher than in Philadelphia thanks to the contrast in state policies.

Pennsylvania embraced hydraulic fracking for shale gas two decades ago; New York shunned it. 

Perhaps worse, the Hochul-Cuomo “Climate Action Plan” is sending utility bills soaring with hidden surcharges to fund windmill construction and other wildly costly flights of fantasy.

And pushes us all to switch to electric stoves, heat, cars and so on — without actually increasing the local supply of electricity.

Natural gas provides more than 70% of home heating statewide; gas generates 63% of Con Ed’s electricity.

Sure would be nice if we were harvesting the state’s huge supplies of natural gas, rather than importing the fuel (and electricity) from our neighbors.

Heck, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in 2023 recommended that New York and other Northeastern states bolster their gas-energy infrastructure; Hochul ignored it.\

All these green gestures don’t actually put a dent in climate change, but only burden and endanger working New Yorkers.

Ditch the lunatic energy policies, governor: Frack, Kathy, frack.

https://nypost.com/2025/03/05/opinion/frack-kathy-frack-or-new-york-will-continue-to-be-held-over-an-energy-barrel-by-canada/

Veeva guidance above views

 Veeva Systems (NYSE: VEEV) reported Q4 EPS of $1.74, $0.16 better than the analyst estimate of $1.58. Revenue for the quarter came in at $720.88 million versus the consensus estimate of $699.18 million.

GUIDANCE:

Veeva Systems sees Q1 2025 EPS of $1.74-$1.75, versus the consensus of $1.62. Veeva Systems sees Q1 2025 revenue of $726-726 million, versus the consensus of $725.8 million.

Veeva Systems sees FY2026 EPS of ~$7.32, versus the consensus of $6.97. Veeva Systems sees FY2026 revenue of $3.04-3.05 billion, versus the consensus of $3.06 billion.

https://www.streetinsider.com/Earnings/Veeva+Systems+%28VEEV%29+Tops+Q4+EPS+by+16c+%3B+Offers+Guidance/24458253.html

Two polls show the public is thrilled with Trump's address to Congress

 

As Democrats pulled one petulant stunt after another at President Trump's address to Congress last night, polls show that the public wasn't buying it.

Instead, it was impressed with what Trump had to say.

According to The Hill:

Most people watching President Trump’s first joint address to Congress approved of his speech according to snap polls. 

Seventy-six percent of people approved of the president’s remarks, while 23 percent disapproved as reported Wednesday in CBS News and YouGov survey results.

A majority of respondents, 63 percent, said Trump spent a lot of time on issues they cared about compared to 28 percent who said the opposite. Another 9 percent said he spent no time at all on their topics of interest.

Respondents also noted that his speech left them with a positive feeling overall, 68 percent said the speech made them feel hopeful, 54 percent said it made them proud, and 27 percent were worried by the remarks while 16 percent said they were angry, according to the data.

CNN's polling reflected a similar result.

The pollsters found that Trump was addressing issues that mattered to voters -- ending waste, fraud and abuse in government spending, closing the open border, getting rid of men competing in women's sports, explaining tariffs, outlining the new initiatives of Bobby Kennedy in making America healthy again, honoring heroes and those who have bravely endured obstacles.

Those things matter to voters -- and with Trump taking those issues, all Democrats had were crazy protests, getting thrown out of the session for uncivil behavior, waving weird paddleboards, color-coordinating wardrobes, doing walkouts, and making robotic talking-point videos, such as this one:

It was summed up this way by Mary Katherine Ham:

No wonder the public isn't buying it.

Every childish thing Democrats have done in these last 24 hours has been toxic for their prospects as Trump rises in the polls, just by addressing things people care about.

Deep down, they seem to know this.

I was struck by how official Democrat respondent, Sen. Elissa Slotkin, seemed to go out of her way to appropriate President Trump's ideas as if they were her own. She spoke of border enforcement. She nattered on about being against government waste.

She postured about 'defending the country' as a former CIA hack, which was not the rimshot she thought it was, given what we know about the agency's illegal censorship of Americans and illegal partisan acts directed against President Trump in his last term.

She even cited Ronald Reagan as the great role model, mangling her history a bit, given how Democrats treated Reagan.

Democrats are now suddenly onboard with all these things, after what we saw with Joe Biden? They really care about fiscal discipline and the migrant surge? They say they now inherit the Reagan mantle?

Oh, and she didn't mention stuff like this:

... just the usual pretty talk about 'inclusion.'

Such phony stuff, given their record. Either they're having a deathbed conversion to these ideas they have utterly rejected in the last four years or they're up to the usual gaslighting, hoping that can fool the public this time as Biden and Kamala Harris were unable to do, claiming they've been Trumpist all along, knowing full well the popularity of his ideas.

It's just the cherry on the sundae of this miserable confection.

But the public has moved on, not wasting time with this series of idiocies -- Rep. Al Green on the stupid end, and Sen. Elissa Slotkin on the 'wears shoes' end.

What a wretched party. They aren't going to win anyone over, and all they do is reveal themselves as a party on the rocks.

No wonder a cold realist like David Axelrod, could see how bad it all was:

The story is in the polls: Trump rising. Trump is vanquishing his enemies for good.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/03/two_polls_show_the_public_is_thrilled_with_trump_s_address_to_congress.html

What CCP Fears If US Can Negotiate An End to Russia–Ukraine War: Analysts

 by Dorothy Li via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

If President Donald Trump can negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, communist China could become the next target of the United States, analysts say.

During a phone call on Feb. 24Chinese leader Xi Jinping reaffirmed the “no limit” partnership he declared three years ago with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

In a show of unity, Xi told Putin that their nations are “good neighbors” and “true friends who have been through thick and thin together,” according to Beijing’s readout.

Analysts said the warm sentiments expressed as the war in Ukraine marks its third year reflect the Chinese regime’s serious concerns.

Xi Jinping’s greatest fear is that Putin might lean towards Trump” or even facilitate U.S. efforts to contain his regime, Cai Shenkun, an independent Chinese current affairs commentator, told The Epoch Times.

According to Cai, the alliance between the two autocracies is not as solid as it appears. He said that the war in Ukraine has acted as a catalyst, forging a closer bond between Beijing and Moscow and their economies. Once a cease-fire is reached, however, some longstanding friction points in their partnership, such as territorial disputes along their shared border, may resurface.

Additionally, Beijing’s support of Moscow’s war effort has strained its ties with Washington and Brussels, he said.

U.S. officials have repeatedly criticized China for helping Russia to rebuild its defense-industrial complex through the export of goods that can be used for both civilian and military purposes, thus providing Moscow an economic lifeline amid Western sanctions.

Meanwhile, European leaders, including the NATO secretary-general, are reconsidering their reliance on authoritarian regimes, especially in light of the largest armed conflict in Europe since World War II.

“In the past, we made the mistake of becoming dependent on Russian oil and gas. We must not repeat that mistake with China: Depending on its money, its raw materials, and its technologies,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said at an event in April 2024. “Dependencies make us vulnerable.”

Cai said that as global distrust toward communist China rises, the regime could find itself sidelined once the conflict in Ukraine ends and Putin no longer needs Xi’s support.

“Neither Ukraine nor Russia will be grateful to China [for the war]. Europe certainly won’t either,” Cai said. “Xi was left with little choice but to place his bets on Putin.”

A Shift in US Focus Toward China

Chen Shih-min, an expert on Western Europe security and the Chinese military at the National Taiwan University in Taipei, echoed those viewpoints. Beijing and Moscow are bonded by common interests, he said, which means they'll diverge once these interests conflict.

Chen said that once the Ukraine war is settled, the Trump administration’s intention may be to shift its focus to driving Beijing and Moscow apart and confronting the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Trump will come down hard on the CCP,” Chen told The Epoch Times.

U.S. defense leaders have indicated a strategic pivot toward countering threats from communist China.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has described communist China as a peer competitor with the “capability and intent to threaten our homeland and core national interests in the Indo-Pacific.”

“The U.S. is prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific, recognizing the reality of scarcity, and making the resourcing tradeoffs to ensure deterrence does not fail,” Hegseth said in his opening remarks at the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in Brussels on Feb. 12.

This shift in focus extends beyond the U.S. military.

“To bring manufacturing back to the United States and to address the trade deficit, Trump has to target the root of these problems: the CCP,” Chen said.

Challenges Facing Beijing at Home

As external pressures mount, can the CCP withstand the scrutiny? Cheng Cheng-ping, a professor at Taiwan’s National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, said he hasn’t seen any sign indicating the immediate end of the CCP’s rule, although there are indicators of “regime decay and decline,” such as political infighting and a faltering economy.

The world’s second-largest economy is grappling with sluggish domestic demand, an aging population, and a protracted crisis in the real estate sector.

The unemployment rate for people aged 16 to 24 has soared to levels that haven’t been seen in decades. Chinese authorities temporarily paused reporting the figures in June 2023 after official data showed one in five young Chinese were not employed. Many college graduates have turned to low-paying jobs, as the economy falters and foreign companies withdraw, leading to rising public discontent.

Chen said that although public discontent or a slowing economy will not fundamentally threaten the party’s rule—given its mass surveillance and tight social control—it could create a scenario where Xi considers aggressive military action, such as an invasion of Taiwan, to deflect criticism from himself.

Public discontent is very strong. From another point of view, there must be a way to vent this discontent, and a war would be enough to divert the public’s attention from Xi Jinping,” Cheng told The Epoch Times.

The CCP has never ruled Taiwan but views the self-ruled democracy as its own territory and would not rule out using force to seize control. The People’s Liberation Army frequently sends its aircraft and warships to conduct large-scale drills near Taiwan to wear down the island’s defenses.

The most recent live-fire exercises occurred roughly 40 nautical miles off the coast of Kaohsiung City in southern Taiwan. On Feb. 26, Taiwan’s defense ministry reported that 45 Chinese military aircraft and 16 Chinese warships were detected near the island.

Cheng, who visited Kyiv, Odesa, and two other Ukrainian cities in 2023 to study how Taiwan can learn from the war in Europe, said he disagrees with the idea that Xi might act cautiously during the second Trump term.

According to his analysis, the likelihood of an invasion increases as Beijing advances its defense sector, which has outpaced that of the United States in key areas such as shipbuilding.

A leaked U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence report showed China’s shipbuilding capability is more than 200 times greater than that of the United States.

However, a rush into a military attack against Taiwan, according to Cheng, may lead to “the endgame” of Communist rule in China.

The Endgame of Communist Rule in China?

Activist Qin Jin said that despite the absence of any “clear sign” pointing to an immediate fall of the CCP, he won’t be surprised if it all unravels overnight, much like the collapse of the Soviet Union, which few in the West foresaw until it actually happened in 1991.

Qin highlighted the secrecy that cloaks authoritarian regimes, likening the CCP’s internal workings to the Iron Curtain of the Soviet era, dubbing it the “Bamboo Curtain” in China.

What lies behind the Bamboo Curtain is almost impossible to know until the authorities choose to reveal it,” Qin, the chairman of the pro-democracy Federation for a Democratic China in Australia, told The Epoch Times.

As an example of the regime’s opacity, Qin cited Beijing’s tight control of information related to COVID-19, which first emerged in the central Chinese city of Wuhan five years ago.

To this day, Beijing has resisted any international investigation into the origin of the pandemic, leaving the world in the dark about how the pandemic erupted in China.

It only becomes more secretive when it comes to the country’s power center.

Qin pointed to the mystery surrounding the death of former No. 2 official Li Keqiang in October 2023, seven months after he stepped down as premier.

Li’s death at the age of 68 raised eyebrows among China watchers, who highlighted the Party elites’ record of longevity. Li’s two immediate predecessors, Wen Jiabao, 83, and Zhu Rongji, 96, are still living.

Some commentators speculated that Li’s passing coincides with political infighting within the Party’s top brass. A string of senior officials and military commanders, including the former foreign minister Qin Gang and defense minister Li Shangfu, had been abruptly removed from office after unexplained disappearances.

“The details of Li Keqiang’s death will surely be disclosed in the future,” Qin said. “When? After the collapse of the communist regime.

Discontent among law enforcement personnel is surging within the major cities. Recently, Qin spoke with a police chief from a provincial capital who had fled overseas—an indication of unrest even among the high ranks of the public security bureaus, which are usually under tight CCP control.

“It’s akin to a big earthquake,” he said. “Humans may not feel it coming, but animals sense [the danger] beforehand.”

He cautioned that the regime’s collapse could happen unexpectedly, catching the world off-guard.

“It’s entirely possible,” he said. “And I look forward to that day.”

Luo Ya contributed to this report.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/what-ccp-fears-if-us-can-negotiate-end-russia-ukraine-war-analysts