Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Bernie Sanders complains about 'the oligarchy' at $1,000-a-ticket music festival

 


Leftists are gluttons for punishment, and nowhere was that more evident than with the specter of Bernie Sanders complaining about all the "oligarchs" in his address to the Coachella music festival which sports entry tickets from $600 for the cheap seats to $1,300 a pop.

But Bernie was unfazed, even with Vanity Fair making fun of his blue sport coat:

According to KCRA, it was part of his "fighting oligarchy tour," which had several pit stops:

Thousands gathered in Folsom on Tuesday for the "Fighting Oligarchy" tour, spearheaded by Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

The free event, held on Folsom Lake College's athletic track, follows a tour stop in Bakersfield earlier in the day.

The message from the two lawmakers was clear.

"To Mr. Trump and people all over this country, we as Americans will not accept oligarchy," Sanders said to cheers from the crowd. "We will not accept authoritarianism and we will not accept a rigged economy where working people struggle while billionaires become richer."

 

Which was same-old, same-old for Bernie, who has made the exact claim for the past forty years:

Note that it was an affluent white leftist audience he and his sidekick, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, were targeting:

Which is exactly why Democrats lost the last election -- they catered to rich white college-educated liberals and ended up losing everyone else.

Now it's music-festival time for Bernie, and there he goes, showing up like a scarecrow saying the same old stuff he's always said, having to glom off an audience that came for the music, not the political speeches.

Some said they heard booing:


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/04/bernie_sanders_complains_about_the_oligarchy_at_700_a_ticket_music_festival.html


Democrats line up to visit El Salvador -- seeking to bring back a foreign gangbanger

 


Democrats have finally found a cause they can rally around, and they are falling over themselves to make themselves part of it:

According to Axios:

Two members of House Democratic leadership are trying to send an official congressional delegation to the El Salvadorian prison where the Trump administration is sending deportees, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: Dozens of House Democrats have privately expressed interest in participating in such a trip to protest the Trump administration's deportation policies, sources tell Axios.

  • But while lawmakers could travel to the Central American country informally, a Republican committee chair's approval is needed to send an official congressional delegation, or CODEL.
  • A CODEL would provide the members with crucial oversight powers and security resources.

Driving the news: Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) and Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) asked House Oversight Committee chair James Comer (R-Ky.), in a letter first obtained by Axios, to authorize a CODEL to El Salvador.

  • They cited the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who is being held at El Salvador's Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) despite the Supreme Court ordering him to be returned to the U.S.
  • "A Congressional delegation would allow Committee Members to conduct a welfare check on Mr. Abrego Garcia, as well as others held at CECOT," they wrote.

Did they say "dozens"? Dozens?

All to check on the "welfare" of a foreign national whose only accomplishment was to break into our country, engage in MS-13 gang activity, (verified by at least two judges), and then flout his final deportation order in 2019, eventually receiving a "stay of deportation," which protected him from a return to his native El Salvador, but not to any place else. The premise of that was his involvement in gang activity -- convincing a judge that his gang doings made him vulnerable to retaliation from rival gangs in El Salvador. That may mean he killed a few, which isn't a pretty picture. But the point of the stay is moot, because El Salvador got rid of its gang problem -- by building credible prisons. He's perfectly safe in that country, which is a far safer place now than any one-party blue city in the U.S.

Besides that group of would-be junketeers, there's also Sen. Chris van Hollen of Maryland, about whom Common Dreams, a leftist publication, has this report:

... U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen on Tuesday detailed his plans to go to the Central American country to demand his constituent's safe return—and several other Democrats indicated they would follow his lead.

Van Hollen (D-Md.) announced his intention on Monday in a letter to El Salvador's ambassador to the U.S., saying he wanted to meet with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele during his visit to Washington, D.C. this week and that if Abrego Garcia is not home "by midweek," the senator would travel to El Salvador.

On Tuesday, he told CNN that he had not heard back from Bukele regarding his request.

"I hope to meet with officials of the government of El Salvador," he said, adding that it wasn't clear whether Bukele would be in the country during his visit. "I also hope to visit this notorious prison to see Abrego Garcia... I think the situation for both the Trump administration and the president of El Salvador is unsustainable."

So it's at least two of them leading this effort as all the Democrats scurry to their sides.

It's insane.

America just held an election. They voted for an explicit program of mass deportations, and those with criminal backgrounds the least welcome of all.

Now Democrats, who've been on the outs for the past half year have decided to rally around the welfare of a foreign national who has absolutely no respect for U.S. law. They're flying as a group to his country, to "check on his welfare," and "bring him back," which is the exact opposite of what voters voted for.

While they are unlikely to succeed in this endeavor, it's an odd choice of causes to unite around.

Few, if any of the loudest voices calling for Abrego-Garcia's return, have ever visited an American in prison abroad, and not one has visited the families of those whose loved ones have been murdered by illegal aliens, mostly gangbangers like Abrego-Garcia.

It's almost as if illegals are their political base, and Trump's mass deportations are a threat to their votes.

It makes no sense whatsoever, given the popularity of Trump's repatriations of lawbreakers. But as usual, they think of themselves first.

Any wonder their popularity is hovering around 20% now? This is why it's 20%.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/04/democrats_line_up_to_visit_el_salvador_seeking_to_bring_back_a_repatriated_salvadoran_ms_13_gangbanger.html

Conservatives, or at least non-leftists, are coming close to winning elections in California

 


What's the most unlikely thing in politics?

Try seeing conservatives come out on top in a spate of recent special elections in California.

First, we had this astonishing result in San Diego, which held a special election for District 1 of the County Board of Supervisors, after the November winner, Nora Vargas, mysteriously dropped out to spend more time with her family.

According to NBC 7:

Chula Vista Mayor John McCann and Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre appear headed Wednesday for a July 1 runoff election for the District 1 Board of Supervisors seat.

The final batch of results released by the San Diego County Registrar of Voters Tuesday night showed McCann leading the field of seven with 43.58% of the vote, with Aguirre second with 31.62%. San Diego City Councilwoman Vivian Moreno was the only other candidate with at least 10% of the vote, placing third with 13%.

McCann (42.40%) and Aguirre (32.32%) held onto their leads on Friday evening, when an updated vote count was released.

If a candidate receives a majority of the vote, he or she would win outright, avoiding a runoff election.

McCann released a statement on Tuesday evening that read, "I am thankful for the hundreds of volunteers who have worked on my campaign and the thousands of voters that cast their vote for me. They know I will bring common sense back to San Diego County by supporting law enforcement to keep our streets safe, getting homeless off the streets, working to get real solutions on the Tijuana sewage issue and opposing the mileage tax."

The race is officially nonpartisan, but everyone knows that McCann is a Republican and Aguirre is a flaming leftist. McCann, in fact, has won elections before in Chula Vista, where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by at least two to one.

Aguirre, meanwhile, represents Imperial Beach, the border town turned into a Mexican toilet based on untreated sewage brazenly dumped into that town's waters and beaches, making it utterly stink and completely hazardous to come in contact with. For at least three years, she's complained, but done nothing about it, even though she bills herself as a conservationist, and serves on the powerful California Coastal Commission, whose main focus is on denying permits to those who would try to improve their properties or construct new housing. There are many who think she, and her other rival, third place finisher Vivian Moreno, a union favorite, is a little too close to the ruling elites of Tijuana next door, which dispenses the sewage without consequence. Moreno has actually been accused of living in Tijuana -- literally a foreign country, yet seeking great power over the American citizens who are living here.

It makes sense that the miserable pair lost, but they are the ruling establishment -- part of the corrupt Democrat machine that pays no attention to taxes, spending, potholes, or anything else, and uses green consciousness as a figleaf for corrupt slush fund activity, rewarding cronies, while the city goes the way of blue cities, dysfunctional and expensive.

Something snapped. Enough of the voters switched parties to see a conservative come in as the first place finisher, with a runoff expected in a few weeks. There may be enough leftists from among the contenders below to coalesce around Aguirre, but just this result came as a surprise. Up until now, the "analysts" all claimed that the Democrats had it in the bag. It doesn't look like it. We should savor it while we can, that little thread of red that may make for a real red tide in time, maybe not this time, but maybe not so far away, either.

Meanwhile in other San Diego trend-is-your-friend news, this morning, Amy Reichert, a past Republican candidate who hasn't been elected, but who is suddenly in demand as a speaker, editorialist, and television host -- as the best dirt-disher about Democrat doings in town -- reported this:

The leftist mayor of Lemon Grove got himself a recall from disgusted residents -- again, fed up over blue-city corruption, which always happens in a political monopoly. That wasn't on my bingo card, either.

A few weeks ago up the coast, in Huntington Beach, the admittedly conservative surfer town, saw the appointment of openly conservative chef, restaurateur, and commentator, Andrew Gruel, to the city council.

A strong advocate for the Huntington Beach business community, Gruel is the CEO of ‘American Gravy,’ owner of Calico Fish House, and previously owned Slapfish. Known for his innovative approach to the culinary arts and his active engagement in local community philanthropy, like offering his restaurant location as a donation center to assist the victims of the LA fires, Gruel brings a fresh perspective to his new role on the City Council.

They aren't even trying to hide that they are bringing in conservatives anymore in that town. That, too, happened.

Then today, the bombshell news from Oakland: Voters rejected Rep. Barbara Lee, the far left congresswoman with the unions, the wokesters, and every leftist Democrat machine operative in her back pocket, in favor of an unknown candidate, Loren Taylor, following the recall of their own mayor, Sheng Thao, for flaming corruption.

According to KTVU:

Taylor was ahead of the nine other candidates on the ballot with nearly 49 percent of the vote in the first round of ranked-choice voting as of about 8:15 p.m. 

Former U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee was in second place with about 45 percent of the vote. 

All of the other candidates had less than 2 percent of the vote each. 

The results are preliminary and the final vote tally will be announced after the Registrar of Voters Office completes several rounds of ranked-choice vote counting. 

... and ...

Speaking from his downtown Oakland watch party, Taylor said his early lead was indicative of the need for change. He said voters were not standing for business as usual. While he called Lee, his opponent, a political icon, he also said she's someone who's been in the political establishment for 50-plus years. 

"We knew that Oaklanders were hungry for change, hungry for something new that would solve the problems and not just see those same problems reoccur time and time again," said Taylor. "It's great to have the lead but we have been here before." 

His tone was one of overall excitement. He reiterated that public safety was his overall priority. Taylor said he looks forward to sitting down with the current chief of police in Oakland to see what solutions they can come up with. 

Taylor said he wants to see Oakland gain traction on a different trajectory than the negative portrayal it has seen in recent years.

I doubt he's a Republican, but whatever his views, he's better than she is, because no one can get more left-wing than Lee outside the Revolutionary Communist Party, and maybe not even them. Taylor does seem to at least recognize that Oakland is a wokester disaster area whose major league ball team won't even play in that city and which bears the dubious distinction of being the only city ever to lose its In-N-Out Burger and airport hotels, owing to unchecked crime. He may even try to clean it up.

I didn't pay attention to the race much because analysts and media reports insisted that Lee had it in the bag.

Well, surprise -- she didn't.

The numbers, of course, may flip, given that the vote-counting apparat plans to take at least days to count the ballots.

But maybe they won't.

San Francisco just recently elected a reform-minded mayor, defeating the incumbent, who in turn, came out against crazed leftist district attorney Chesa Boudin as too extreme. There is a rightward trend, moving slowly, but surely.

Los Angeles, too, may follow the pattern. It's a city that's absolutely boiling with hate for its out-of-tune socialist mayor, Karen Bass, who failed to prevent the disastrous fires in Altadena and Pacific Palisades, and now has threatened burned-out fire victims with fines for not clearing their rubble as "public nuisances" even as bums litter the streets with no consequences, and she has since issued a whopping total of four, count 'em, four, rebuilding permits, from among the tens of thousands of residents whose homes burned to the ground.

I have long felt that the Los Angeles electoral machine was corrupt, but if the wave is big enough in that city, there could be a recall that works, too.

And it coincides with even the governor of the state, the wretched Gavin Newsom, suddenly waking up and smelling the political coffee. In recent weeks, he's putting on a conservative skinsuit for reasons no one has quite been able to fathom.

Suddenly, he, too, is against corruption and in favor of brush clearance.

The only thing that can be said about this is that the winds of change are all over that state now and Newsom knows it. Let's hope California surprises us again.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/04/not_on_my_bingo_card_conservatives_or_at_least_non_leftists_are_coming_close_to_winning_elections_in_california.html

'Shein, Temu to raise prices as expenses rise while under pressure from Trump’s trade policies'

 Chinese online marketplace Temu and fast-fashion retailer Shein will raise prices on their products next week as President Trump’s crackdown on low-value imports and sweeping tariffs increase expenses for the companies known for their low-priced offerings.

In letters to customers this week that mirror each other, both firms said they will be increasing prices starting April 25, and encouraged shoppers to purchase “now at today’s rates.”

“Due to recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs, our operating expenses have gone up. To keep offering the products you love without compromising on quality, we will be making price adjustments starting April 25, 2025,” their statements read.

Shein and Temu are under pressure from a recent executive order by President Trump that closes the trade loophole that allowed packages worth less than $800 from China and Hong Kong to enter the U.S. free of duties.WILL OLIVER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Shein and Temu, both of which sell products ranging from toys to smartphones, have grown rapidly in the U.S. thanks in part to the “de minimis” exemption enabling them to keep prices low.

However, their business model has come under pressure from a recent executive order signed by President Trump that closes the trade loophole which allowed packages worth less than $800 from China and Hong Kong to enter the U.S. free of duties. The order goes into effect on May 2.

Temu and Shein did not immediately reply to requests for additional comments.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/business/shein-temu-to-raise-prices-under-pressure-from-trumps-trade-policies/

Wilding at will — NY’s crime ‘reforms’ let kids sow terror on our streets

 On the sunny last Saturday of March, 6-year-old Inez O’Brien and her mom Ellena headed home to Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn after going out for mother-daughter haircuts.

They exited the J train at Halsey Street, planning to pop into a bodega on their way.

As they passed PS 137, Inez’s school, they saw a group of five pre-teens, all about 11 or 12, who were obviously out to make trouble.

The kids had surrounded a car in the street and were bashing it with the plastic barrels of their Nerf toy guns.

Once the car sped off, the gang looked for a fresh target.

“Let’s get that lady, now!” one shouted.

They swarmed Inez and her mom, shoving the Nerf guns in their faces and firing pellets at painfully close range.

One gun hit Inez in the mouth, bruising her lip.

“Stop, this is scaring us!” Ellena cried, as she pushed the toys away.

But one kid succeeded in whacking Ellena’s head before the group ran off.

Ellena went to the hospital and needed five staples to close the bloody gash.

There, she met a food deliveryman with a punched-in face who had apparently encountered the same kids.

At home, Inez was hysterical.

Her little brother, age 4, saw his mom drenched in blood and vomited.

When patrol officers drove Ellena around the neighborhood, she identified two of the attackers.

One youth — 120 pounds and five-foot-two — was charged with felony assault for pummeling Ellena with “intent to cause serious physical injury.”

Boy is attacked by other teens.
O’Brien was not the first victim attacked by these individuals, as she met a food deliveryman who got punched in the face by the same group of kids.Photodrive – stock.adobe.com

But NYPD’s juvenile desk had to release the adult-sized thug “due to age.”

And that’s it.

No follow-up, and certainly no justice.

“We want accountability,” Ellena’s husband Matt told me.

“What’s going on? It’s a horrible thing that kids can just run up and assault a woman and her child.”

But that’s exactly what New York now encourages.

In recent years, wilding — youths wreaking random, group violence just for the exhilaration of it — has increased because the consequences for it have evaporated.

“There’s more wilding because we made it clear that we will cut kids every break,” a former Bronx prosecutor lamented.

“The system is set up to get kids out of the system.”

In 2018, the statewide “Raise the Age” law largely removed criminal consequences for 16- and 17-year-olds.

Since then, any misdemeanors they commit and 83% of their felonies land in Family Court — including 75% of violent felonies.

The victims of these crimes cannot even discover the outcomes.

Worse, in 2022 Gov. Kathy Hochul signed “Raise the Lower Age,” an insane statute that made offenders between ages 7 and 11 no longer eligible to be charged as “juvenile delinquents.”

Even if an 11-year-old shoots or stabs another kid in front of his school — anything short of a “completed murder” —  he can’t be taken into custody.

What happens to him?

His family gets offered voluntary social services.

That’s it.

“You can’t even put them in a police car — even if they fired a gun,” said Kevin O’Connor, a former NYPD assistant commissioner for youth strategies. “There’s no criminal recourse anymore.”

Because they are no longer processed, we have no idea how many crimes are committed by kids under age 11.

But in 2021, before this law gave youths infinite license to ill, there were 150 such arrests in New York state, including 50 for assault.

The state’s Office of Court and Family Services promises that the new “differential response services” voluntarily offered to young offenders provide “opportunities and supports that promote racial, ethnic, and gender equity, and overall well-being.”

I doubt the two girls in the group that attacked little Inez just needed some good ol’ fashioned “gender equity support” to whip them into shape.

Compounding these “reforms” is a murky family court system that gives the Department of Probation enormous control over youths’ fate.

In Ellena’s case, Probation would have decided whether her sole detained attacker was simply diverted into social services, rather than face any criminal consequences.

How effective are these services?

How often do kids cycle through them?

No. One. Knows.

No wonder NYC’s youth arrests are up 69% over the past five years, while youth felony assault, like Ellena experienced, is up 119%.

That group of kids went home to their beds after a fun day of terrorizing innocent citizens purely for the jollies.

They have no fear of repercussions, reproach or even stigma.

They will do it again.

Meanwhile, Inez couldn’t sleep that night.

She didn’t want to leave her house or go to the park.

New York is choosing to put innocent kids in danger.

Our laws now fail to differentiate between fear that makes the world seem malicious and unstable — like the attack that traumatized Inez — and fear of consequences that enforce societal rules and boundaries.

Inez, and all New York kids, deserve better.

Hannah E. Meyers is a fellow and the director of policing and public safety at the Manhattan Institute.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/opinion/wilding-at-will-nys-reforms-let-kids-sow-terror/