Search This Blog

Saturday, May 9, 2026

Kim Jong-un Is Not Our Friend

 President Trump has repeatedly referred to Kim Jong-un as his “friend.”  I recognize that this is a bargaining technique and that it is necessary to employ deception when dealing with the likes of Kim, but I wish Trump would not do it.

Kim Jong-un is not Trump’s friend; he is not anybody’s friend.  He oversees the operation of brutal concentration camps, and he has reportedly carried out hundreds of executions, most of them public and involving firing squads but some private and involving the killing of pregnant women and teenagers and using blunt instruments such as pipes and hammers.  No one who represses his people to this extent is a friend to America, the greatest democracy on the planet.

Many of these executions and long-term prison sentences are meted out to what we would consider innocent victims for the “crimes” of listening to Western music or videos; practicing religion; and, at worst, attempting to escape North Korea.  Not only are the ones committing these offenses punished, but their entire family and circle of friends is swept up, something depicted in gripping terms in The Aquariums of Pyongyang.  Even small children, such as the young boy who carries his prized aquarium to the prison camp only to watch all his fish die, are sent to prison camps for the “crimes” of friends or family.

When public executions take place, thousands of persons, including spouses and children, are often forced to watch.  In some cases, these very family members are the ones who have betrayed the victims to the regime in exchange for leniency or perks of some kind.  All of this has been documented in the many books and articles written by defectors and online sites such as NK Pro and our own Department of State site “Prisons of North Korea.”  Articles in the Korea Herald, a leading South Korean newspaper, and Korea Joong Ann Daily, are extremely well informed and credible.

NK News is a particularly comprehensive site, on which hundred of articles devoted to accountability for prison camp abuses and other crimes against humanity in North Korea can be accessed.  Typical of NK Watch is an article entitled “Core Crimes Against Humanity in North Korea: The Operations of Political Prison Camps (Total Control Zones).”  Another is entitled “The Defector: Ahn Myeong Chul shares his experience at the North Korean prison camps and his new life in South Korea.”  The information is out there; all that is missing is the heart and will of all persons in the West to object and insist that pressure be put on the North Korean leadership to change.

Unfortunately, this has not happened, and it appears that Kim has become even more intransigent.  The number of persons sent to North Korea’s prison camps is rising, and the number of executions is rising as well, according to a new report by the Transitional Justice Working Group, in part due to stricter enforcement of North Korea’s “Reactionary Thought and Culture Rejection Law.”  As of June 2025, it was estimated that there were 192,000 prisoners in the six notorious North Korean prison camps.  An anonymous source pointed to “the arrest of many young people for collectively distributing foreign videos, with punishment extending not just to the individuals but to entire families being transferred together.”

Information officially coming out of North Korean prison camps is practically nonexistent, but reports from survivors, those released having served their terms, and the very few escapees paint a picture of corporal punishment on a daily basis, rape, torture, forced abortions, infanticide, starvation, untreated disease, and executions, all of which is supported by a system of obligatory spying among and reporting of friends, family, and associates.  Along with these brutalities are the lack of adequate food, shelter, and clothing and harsh working conditions.

One reason for this crackdown is the growing familiarity of North Korean youth with Western and especially South Korean music and video.  Punishments of this kind do not exist in the West.  I myself possess a small collection of music CDs purchased in Beijing, and many others brought back from what was then communist Yugoslavia.  No one ever confronted me about importing music from communist countries.  Imagine if even listening to a foreign radio station could lead to imprisonment or death.  That is the level of control exerted in North Korea.

This should matter to Americans, and it does to many, especially to conservatives.  (For liberals, it seems to be different: I can’t recall any effort by the Biden administration to change North Korean policy, perhaps because so-called progressives in the U.S. and communists in North Korea share the same ideological groundings.)  All persons of good faith should oppose the mistreatment of human beings anywhere, but especially on such as large scale and with such brutality as in North Korea.

We cannot remedy all the evils that exist in the world, and to attempt direction intervention in North Korea would be extremely foolish.  But that does not mean that we should remain silent or fail to act.  Economic pressure might be successful, especially if it involved the cooperation of China, North Korea’s chief supporter.  Even without regime change, prisoners could be reduced or conditions in the camps be made more humane.

As conservatives, we have an obligation to stay informed about what is happening in the world and do what is possible to improve it.  Otherwise, what is happening halfway across the globe may come back to bite us, as it did in WWII and again on 9/11.  We cannot make the rest of the world perfect or engage in nation-building, but we can inform ourselves, condemn what is wrong, and pray for a world that respects the sanctity of life.

Jeffrey Folks is the author of many books and articles on American culture, most recently Heartland of the Imagination (2011).

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/kim_jong_un_is_not_our_friend.html

Gavin's dirty diapers

 by Monica Showalter

So this really happened:

According to San Francisco-based KRON4:

Gov. Gavin Newsom was joined by other state officials in San Francisco’s Exploratorium museum on Friday morning to announce a partnership with the nonprofit Baby2Baby on a new statewide program that will distribute diapers to the families of all newborns in California.

The Golden Gate Start program, set to begin this year at hospitals with large numbers of Medi-Cal patients, will provide 400 free diapers to all newborns at select centers before expanding to all medical and birthing centers across the state.

Newsom said the state will be the “first in the nation” to provide a free diaper program — something he believes will help reduce the financial strain families face and encourage more people to have children. He said the average cost of diapers since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic has risen by 45%, and when coupled with other rising costs can put families in difficult financial situations.

“The biggest problem, defined universally in our city, our state and our nation, is the issue of affordability,” said Newsom. “This is what affordability looks like. It’s not a slogan, it’s a box of diapers.”

It's pure Hugo Chavez theatre, hurling out diaper bundles to the penniless descamisados and expecting political favors in return as midterms approach. It was probably meant that way, too, given that the intended audience would have recognized the gambit well: One out of seven, or 64,000, babies are born in California each year have parents who are illegal immigrants. Most are on Medi-Cal, the state's low-income 'free' health care insurance, and local news in San Diego reported that hospitals with the most Medi-Cal recipients were selected as first in line to get the free diapers.

The problems with this go well beyond the Chavista tactics.

The diapers are being distributed at a big markup for a Newsom crony:

Hand them a Costco membership and a hundred bucks for diapers at a net cost of $165 and they will have many more diapers than the 400-per-baby that Newsom is handing out. Twelve cents a diaper at Costco, 50 or 60 cents a diaper under this Baby2Baby handout program. Worse still, welfare recipients already get free diapers through CalWorks, so this is just gravy that can be sold on the black market.

But it gets grosser: What else is in this dirty diaper if we dig deeper?

That Newsom crony drawing the profit off the 'partnership' is all in the family.

According to Katy Grimes, writing at the California Globe:

Gavin Newsom isn’t just giving away free diapers, he’s helping fund, at taxpayer expense, Baby2Baby, whose mission says it “provides children in need with diapers, clothing and all the basic necessities that every child deserves.”

And notably, one of Baby2Baby’s Co-CEOs, Norah Weinstein, sits on the board of the First Partner’s California Partners Project. “Kelly Sawyer Patricof and Norah Weinstein are the Co-CEOs of Baby2Baby,” their website says.

The other person who sits on the board of the California Partners Project is one Jennifer Siebel Newsom, who just happened to be married to Gavin Newsom.

Family values indeed, all through the diapers.

Grimes continues:

Okay, they want to give free diapers to every baby leaving the hospital.

“Through Baby2Baby’s existing statewide partnerships with hospitals, community-based organizations, and Welcome Baby programs, Baby2Baby will manage diaper procurement, warehousing, and hospital distribution of the Golden State Start program, providing diapers for newborns in all regions of the state.”

Hospitals already send new mothers home with some free diapers, donated by Pampers or Huggies.

And if Gov. Newsom was not running a new $20 million grift through a $77 million “non-profit,” the state could just provide coupons for free diapers to new mothers. But then money couldn’t be disappeared into a non-profit, or co-mingled or diverted.

So it's all about profit for Newsom's friends, now that the old governorship is coming to an end, in what Latino voters would recognize as 'La PiƱata,' or, the urge of exiting politicians to steal everything that isn't nailed down before leaving office and usually fleeing the country. The diaper program is redundant. It's unneccessary, It's costly to taxpayers, particularly since it could be distributed more cheaply through vouchers.

But here Newsom is, touting it and we can see all that's in it.

 The smell of dirty diapers is all around him with this grifty deal, and he's not even hiding it.

Sunday talkies: Hassett, Hilton, Bhattacharya, Wright, Waltz, Huckabee Sanders

 NewsNation “The Hill Sunday”: Host of “Cooking with Congress” Bennett Rea

Fox News “Fox News Sunday”: Rep. Jack Reed (D-RI), actress Candace Cameron Bure, Grace and Bill Drexel

Fox News “Sunday Morning Futures”:  National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, California GOP gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton, Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.), Rep. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio)

CNN “State of the Union”: Acting CDC Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Rep. Jim Clyburn (R-S.C.)

CBS “Face the Nation”: Energy Secretary Chris Wright, Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), Save the Children President and CEO Janti Soeripto, former FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb

ABC “This Week”: U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz, retired Adm. William McRaven, infectious disease expert Dr. Michael Osterholm

NBC “Meet the Press”: Energy Secretary Chris Wright, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R), Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D)

https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/5871312-sunday-shows-preview-trump-sends-mixed-signals-on-iran-as-energy-costs-climb/

Caught On Tape: Cal. Billionaire Tax Architect Admits Wealth Confiscation Could Go Even Further

 One of the co-authors of California’s controversial 'one-time' tax on billionaires appeared to suggest that the levy could extend beyond a single imposition.

Marxist economics professor Emmanuel Saez, who hails from France, made the comment during a Tuesday debate against economist Arthur Laffer at the University of California, Berkeley.

I don’t think it’s going to be a one-time tax. Because you can’t surprise billionaires more than once,” Saez said. "Even then, maybe some of them were expecting something like this. So, it’s going to be a debate about this time, you know, a permanent wealth tax at a low rate that’s going to last for a number of years.”

Watch the entire debate below:

The radical tax pushed by the far-left Service Employees International Union–United Healthcare Workers West would slap California residents with a punishing one-time 5% levy on anyone with assets over $1 billion.

The proposal has reverberated through Silicon Valley, where several high-profile figures have already established residency elsewhere. Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have moved to Florida, drawn by its more favorable business and tax environment, while Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg purchased a $150 million mansion in Miami. This week, Bloomberg reported that Palantir CEO Alex Karp scooped up a Miami-area mansion for $46 million, while the company itself has recently relocated from Denver to Florida.

Even Reid Hoffman, the LinkedIn co-founder, prominent Democrat donor, and longtime buddy of convicted schrodinger's pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, has publicly criticized the proposal, describing California’s wealth tax tax as a “horrendous idea” that would hasten the departure of tech founders and executives from the state.

California is not alone among Democrat-leaning states experiencing such outflows. This week, former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, a longtime backer of liberal causes, announced his relocation from Washington state to Miami, Florida, shortly after state legislators advanced a bill imposing a tax on residents earning more than $1 million annually.

"We have moved to Miami for our next adventure together. We are enjoying the sunshine of South Florida and its allure to our kids on the East Coast as they raise families of their own," he wrote in a Linkedin post.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/caught-tape-california-billionaire-tax-architect-admits-wealth-confiscation-could-go-even

IRGC threatens to fire at US ships

 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander Majid Mousavi warned that Iran's aerospace forces are prepared to fire on US targets, including American warships in the Middle East.

Tensions between Washington and Tehran remain high, as an agreement to end hostilities proved elusive. Meanwhile, the US said it was still expecting the Iranians to submit their response to the latest proposal.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/IRGC-threatens-to-fire-at-US-ships/66258244

Wall Street Keeps Testing AI Traders, But Most Are Still Underperforming

 Recent trading competitions suggest large language models are still unreliable portfolio managers, according to Bloomberg.

Tests involving models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and xAI have often delivered underwhelming results: many lost money, traded excessively, and made erratic decisions despite receiving identical prompts. In several cases, models appeared unable to stick to coherent strategies for more than a few trading sessions.

Bloomberg writes that one of the clearest examples came from Alpha Arena, a competition created by startup Nof1. Eight models were each given $10,000 and asked to trade U.S. tech stocks over a two-week period using different strategies, including defensive approaches and leveraged bets. Across four competitions, the models collectively lost roughly a third of their capital, and only six of 32 outcomes ended in profit.

The gap in behavior was striking: xAI’s Grok 4.20 made just 158 trades in one contest, while Alibaba Group’s Qwen executed 1,418 under the exact same prompt.

The experiments reflect growing interest in whether generative AI can eventually outperform traditional fund managers. Wall Street firms including JPMorgan Chase and Balyasny Asset Management already rely on AI for research, fraud detection, and internal analysis, but they have largely stopped short of handing over actual investment decisions. As Nof1 founder Jay Azhang put it, current models still struggle with basics like “position sizing, timing, signal weighting and overtrading.”

That broader pattern has shown up elsewhere too. Research blog Flat Circle tracked 11 public AI trading competitions and found that while every event produced at least one profitable model, only two generated a profitable median return — suggesting most bots still underperform more often than not. Azhang was even more blunt about the state of autonomous trading: giving an LLM money and letting it invest independently “isn’t a thing yet.”

Some firms are still betting that the technology improves with better tools and tighter guardrails. Intelligent Alpha, for example, runs an AI-driven fund that combines LLMs with earnings transcripts, analyst forecasts, corporate filings, macroeconomic indicators, and web searches to make predictions. In late 2025, OpenAI’s ChatGPT correctly predicted the direction of earnings estimate revisions 68% of the time — its strongest showing so far.

Evaluating these systems remains difficult because traditional backtesting methods can be misleading: models may already have embedded knowledge of past market events, creating look-ahead bias. That has pushed more firms toward live-market experiments, where results so far suggest AI may be useful as an assistant — but not a replacement — for human traders.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/wall-street-keeps-testing-ai-traders-most-are-still-underperforming

Hantavirus: Stop The Spread Is Back

 Via the Brownstone Institute,

Hollywood loves a good sequel and so does politics and pharmaceutical development. 

Since Covid, there have been several attempted disease scares – Mpox, Swine flu, Bird flu, Chikungunya, Measles – but nothing has really caught the attention of audiences like the new Hantavirus frenzy. 

Today’s evidence comes from DRUDGE REPORT: global effort to stop the spread. Is “flatten the curve” next?

Let’s remember how this began last year, with of course, a hantavirus death in the family of one of America’s most beloved Hollywood actors. It was Betsy Arakawa, Gene Hackman’s wife, who died February 12, 2025, from apparent hantavirus infection from rodents in the home. Terrifying image. 

At that point, no regular person had ever heard of such a disease. There is a reason. It’s rare and human-to-human spread is nearly unknown. Strange that it would hit the wife of the appropriately named Gene Hackman (get it?), leading man of the prescient 1998 movie Enemy of the State

Next up we have a reprise of the Plague Ship motif. Like the Diamond Princess, it is a cruise ship, the MV Hondius operated by Oceanwide Expeditions with 147 passengers, departing from Argentina and now anchored off Cape Verde, West Africa. 

It was headed to the Canary Islands when three people died, two with lab-confirmed hantavirus. No port would allow the ship to dock. With the assistance of rescue boats, the dead have been carefully removed by workers in hazmats and masks.

A flight attendant who came in contact with a dead body is now hospitalized and in rough condition, suggesting that even coming close to a person with hantavirus is risky stuff. No one can figure out how this is even possible. So mysterious, so unusual, so terrifying, just like the movie Contagion

This fits with the theory of Drs. Fauci and Morens that we need not worry about lab-created pathogens when animal-to-human spillover is becoming more common. This is why, they wrote in August 2020, that we must commence to “rebuilding the infrastructures of human existence, from cities to homes to workplaces, to water and sewer systems, to recreational and gatherings venues.”

Ready to opine for the press is the World Health Organization’s Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, she of Stanford University pedigree, now widely quoted as the go-to authority. 

You might remember Dr. Kerkhove from the original cast of the Covid production. It was she who wrote the WHO’s report to the world following the February 2020 junket to Wuhan. (We know this from the metadata of the report, which she failed to cleanse in the rush to publication.) 

“Achieving China’s exceptional coverage with and adherence to these containment measures,” she wrote of the CCP’s extreme lockdowns, “has only been possible due to the deep commitment of the Chinese people to collective action in the face of this common threat. At a community level this is reflected in the remarkable solidarity of provinces and cities in support of the most vulnerable populations and communities.”

Many close observers credit Kerkhove’s report with inspiring the worldwide lockdown of all nations but four in the following weeks. She still works at the WHO. Hardly anyone remembers any of this. There is no mechanism in place for her to be held to account for her role. 

There is no known cure but a vaccine is in development by Moderna based on the mRNA platform. 

As a result, Moderna’s stock, down dramatically from its highs, is now starting to recover. It is now up 100 percent year over year. The buy signal is strong with this one.

Looking back at the Covid prequel, there was always a flaw in the coronavirus caper, namely its short period of latency, roughly that of a cold or flu. You are infectious for a few days without symptoms while you pass it on. A genuine disease panic needs a longer period of latency. You need to be infected for weeks while spreading it far and wide. 

Why is this? Because every infectious disease confronts the logic of survival. A smart virus does not kill its hosts – it needs them to infect others – but a dumb one does, which is why dumb viruses are not good candidates for pandemics. 

This persistent trade-off between severity and prevalence can only be gamed by a long period of latency. That’s extremely rare and not even lab-created viruses manage this balancing act well. 

As it turns out, this hantavirus does have a very long period of latency, we are assured by the Harvard School of Public Health. It has issued a pronouncement: “The incubation period – the time between when a person is infected and when they begin to experience symptoms – is usually in the range of two to three weeks, but may be as long as eight weeks.”

Two months! Imagine that. Here we might finally have our candidate for the silent killer about which Deborah Birx fantasized during the last iteration of this story.

Keep in mind that no high institution in the US has repudiated lockdowns, even if two-thirds of the public believes they were pointlessly damaging. The call for Covid Justice has now 37,300 signatures but not enough to cause the Senate, House, or any other legislative body to speak clearly that this will never be tolerated again. 

To this day, the plan of the World Health Organization – which is already practicing for the next pandemic – is to push for lockdowns until vaccination in the event of a new disease scare. “Every country should apply non-pharmaceutical measures systematically and rigorously at the scale the epidemiological situation requires,” they say. 

Meanwhile, the Biden plan was for a 130-day lockdown in the event of a new pandemic. 

There are few mechanisms in place in any country to prevent this from happening. There are good people in government who would oppose this with strong conviction but will they even be asked their opinions? Or does this all occur with any obvious evidence of democratic volition? 

Who precisely is directing and producing this sequel? No one knows for sure. Will it be a box office hit like the last time or only have a limited release to test market interest? All the ingredients are here for an Academy Award: rodents, long latency, spread through casual contact with the dead, workers in hazmat suits, no known cure, a vaccine in rushed development. 

The real beauty of disease panic is that it has broad audience appeal and crosses partisan lines. National Review is all in already, as it was with Covid, and surely The Nation will join the effort in days. 

These are well-worn plot devices and sequels are rarely as compelling or profitable as the original. But when one is out of other ideas – and the public clamor to indict Fauci grows by the hour – it’s always worth a shot. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/hantavirus-stop-spread-back