Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Iran fired drones at commercial ships after US agreement, US official says

 

Iran has launched multiple drones toward commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz since the United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding on Sunday, according to a US official, NBC News reported on Tuesday.

The official said the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has been carrying out repeated drone launches targeting shipping lanes in the strategic waterway. US forces have intercepted the drones before they could threaten commercial or military vessels, the report said.

According to NBC News, the official added that the IRGC has launched multiple drones each night since the agreement was signed, and that the US military continues to coordinate with commercial shipping operators to support safe transit through the Strait of Hormuz.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202606139149

Policy brief urges removal, not dilution, of Iran uranium stockpile

 

A new policy brief by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) said that the handling of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile will be a central issue in any long-term US-Iran agreement, warning that on-site dilution would carry significant proliferation risks.

The brief says that “down blending” the uranium inside Iran would be reversible and would allow Tehran to retain access to material that could later be re-enriched. It adds that even dilution to low enrichment levels would preserve significant breakout capability and could leave the material vulnerable to concealment or seizure.

The report added that the safest options would be either the immediate destruction of the material or its export to an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) fuel bank, such as in Kazakhstan, for controlled storage and potential limited civilian use.


https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202606139149

New Oregon Initiative Would Criminalize Hunting, Fishing And Farming

 Only 1% of the American population identifies as vegan (a person who refrains from using or consuming any animal products), and around 3% of the population identifies as vegetarian.  It is therefore a little confusing as to why American political and social discourse is hijacked by vegan issues so often. 

Leftist activists have adopted the age-old mantra that the "squeaky wheel gets the oil"; but imagine a wheel that never gets enough oil?  Imagine a movement specifically designed to keep society constantly on egg shells, trying to figure out different ways to satisfy that squeaky wheel so it will finally shut up?

One eventually has to ask the obvious question:  Why don't we simply throw that insufferable wheel in the garbage?

A perfect example of why Americans need to start aggressively discriminating against veganism as a movement has popped up in Oregon.  A new initiative called the PEACE Act (IP28) has enough backing to make it on the state ballot in November.  The initiative originally gained support as a way to "end animal cruelty", but the details of the proposed law turned out to be a vegan's version of Orwell.  

The petition has more than 120,000 signatures, according to the Oregon secretary of state’s office. The campaign needs about 117,000 valid signatures to make the ballot.  Initiative Petition 28 would expand animal cruelty protections in Oregon by effectively giving “all” animals the same protections currently in place for dogs and cats, supporters say. Opponents argue the measure would go much further, potentially criminalizing hunting, fishing and raising animals for food.

It's important to understand that vegan activists and leftists in general do not operate from a basic understanding of the environment.  They know next to nothing about the science behind these issues and legislate from a purely emotional position.  Banning hunting would effectively destroy various wild animal populations, causing disastrous disease outbreaks that the hunting community has kept in check for decades.    

That said, a lot of attention in the media has been paid to the hunting side of this law while the biggest impact would be felt in cattle farming and the fishing industry in Oregon.  If passed, the law would effectively criminalize the entire meat production base for the state under "animal cruelty" statutes. 

No state has the capacity to sustain on a mass vegan diet, so, animal products would have to be shipping in from the rest of the country, driving up prices.   

Of course, this tiny minority of militant animal rights activists are not working alone.  They are able to thrive and organize because they have a host of international NGOs and politicians working with them.  These institutions act as amplifiers for activist groups that would otherwise go completely ignored.  The United Nations, for example, has long been involved in global efforts to remove meat from the menu for most of the human population.

The UN fabricated the notion of animal agriculture acting as a primary mechanism for greenhouse gases and global warming.  Of course, there is zero evidence of a causation or correlation relationship between animal methane and changes in the Earth's temperatures, just as there is no concrete evidence of a connection between human industry and climate change. 

One can speculate as to why the UN is so interested in eliminating meat from the human diet, but stopping global warming is certainly not the real reason.  

Global warming claims continues to be debunked as one of the biggest hoaxes of the century, and the idea of compelling the public to stop eating meat in the name of "saving the climate" just isn't going to work.  It would appear that the political left and their NGO backers intend to criminalize meat if they can't convince people to go vegan voluntarily.   

This is why the majority of Americans distrust and despise vegans:  It not because they've chosen a different lifestyle, it's because they are obsessed with forcing that lifestyle on everyone else.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-oregon-initiative-would-criminalize-hunting-fishing-and-farming

US FDA sends 25 letters to telehealth companies over claims on compounded weight-loss drugs

 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued warning letters to a device maker and several drug makers for failing to meet quality system and current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements. The agency has also cited more than two dozen telehealth companies for marketing compounded glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist drugs without authorization.

Zoll Medical

FDA cited Zoll Medical for several quality system regulations and medical device reporting violations. The Maine-based company, which makes defibrillators, ventilators, and other medical devices, failed to establish and maintain procedures for corrective and preventive action (CAPA), according to the agency. Investigators listed several instances in which they said the company failed to implement CAPAs when it received complaints or encountered nonconforming products and other quality problems.

Zoll was also cited for failing to establish and maintain procedures for validating device design, including failure to verify and validate a labeling change of their 731 MRI-compatible ventilators. Furthermore, the company was cited for failing to establish and maintain procedures to ensure that the products and services it purchases meet the required specifications.

Additionally, FDA cited Zoll for failing to follow MDR reporting requirements, including incidents where there may have been a reasonable concern of a product malfunction, and the company didn't notify the agency within the required timeframe.

"For example, the information included for Incident No. 1095284 reasonably suggests that your firm’s ventilator malfunctioned (i.e. insufficient user instructions that led to an unexpected shutdown) while operating near an MRI," said FDA. "The information included in the complaint reasonably suggests that the malfunction would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, if it were to recur.

"Therefore, the referenced complaint represents an MDR reportable event as defined in 21 CFR 803.3(o)," the agency. "Your firm became aware of the event on June 20, 2024, and FDA received the MDR, 1220908‐2025‐00947, for the corresponding incident on March 10, 2025, which is beyond the 30‐calendar day timeframe."

Sante, Pharmathen, and InvaDerm

FDA issued warning letters to three drug manufacturers, including the Canadian over-the-counter drugmaker Sante Manufacturing, for failing to adhere to CGMP requirements.

The agency said Sante failed to conduct tests to verify the identity of each component of their drug products, and to validate and establish the reliability of the components it receives from its suppliers at appropriate intervals.

FDA noted that one of the incoming components used in its manufacturing is known to be high-risk for contamination and Sante relied on the supplier's certificate of analysis rather than conducting its own testing to ensure the component met requirements.

"The use of ingredients contaminated with [redacted] has resulted in various lethal poisoning incidents in humans worldwide," said FDA. "See [redacted] to help you meet the CGMP requirements when manufacturing drugs containing ingredients at high-risk for [redacted] contamination at [redacted].

"Without adequate testing and confirmation of reliability of supplier test results, you lack scientific evidence that the components or drug products conform to appropriate specifications prior to use in the drug products you manufacture," the agency added.

Sante was also cited for failing to have proper written procedures and process controls to ensure its final products meet identity, strength, quality, and purity requirements. The agency also said it the company's quality control unit (QU) failed its responsibility to ensure its products were manufactured in compliance with CGMP, and the final products met specifications.

"Significant findings in this letter demonstrate that your firm does not operate an effective quality system in accord with CGMP," said FDA. "In addition to the lack of effective management oversight of your production operations, we found your QU is not enabled to exercise proper authority and/or has insufficiently implemented its responsibilities.

"Executive management should immediately and comprehensively assess your company’s global manufacturing operations to ensure that your systems, processes, and products conform to FDA requirements," the agency added.

Ultimately, FDA said that Sante should engage with a qualified consultant to help it address its CGMP shortcomings. More specifically, the agency recommended that the consultant conduct a six-system audit of its operations to assess CGMP compliance and evaluate its CAPA processes.

Similarly, FDA sent a warning letter to Greek drugmaker Pharmathen International for CGMP violations. The company was cited for failing to implement proper procedures to prevent microbiological contamination of sterile products. The agency noted that the airflow studies of its manufacturing procedures, intended to ensure they were produced in aseptic conditions, failed to show unidirectional airflow, and instead, it was observed that the airflow reentered the filling line.

"Our inspection also found multiple instances of gram-negative microbes in ISO 5 air samples. It is highly atypical to find gram-negative microbes in an aseptic processing room environment," said FDA. "In one such instance, you attributed the probable cause of gram-negative microbial contamination to room disinfection practices and [redacted] contamination.

"It is essential that you thoroughly investigate the recurring identification of gram-negative microbes in your aseptic processing environment to determine the root causes and fully remediate with appropriate actions," the agency added.

Pharmathen was also cited for failing to investigate unexplained discrepancies and batch failures to ensure the final product met specifications.

"Your firm did not adequately investigate out-of-specification (OOS) and out-of-limit (OOL) results," said FDA. "Your investigations of sterility failures and significant environmental monitoring excursions lacked adequate scientific rationale to support root causes and implementation of effective CAPA.

"Your firm did not implement effective CAPA to reduce recurrence of severe contamination hazards including, but not limited to, operator error that had contributed significantly to recurring sterility and media-fill failures over the past five years," the agency added.

Additionally, the FDA said Pharmathen failed to ensure manufacturing operations were conducted within appropriately defined areas to prevent product contamination and to properly document laboratory control mechanisms. More specifically, the agency said its microbiological laboratory records were inadequate, and its investigators found that microbial plates in its incubators lacked appropriate documentation.

"We also noticed that critical CGMP documentation forms used to document test results printed from your IQVIA software (e.g., sterility test report) are not adequately controlled," said FDA. "Proper document control and data management is foundational to CGMP to ensure the availability and integrity of data.

"Data should be attributable, legible, contemporaneously recorded, original or a true copy, and accurate (ALCOA) to ensure complete and accurate records," the agency added.

Finally, FDA said Pharmathen's quality system lacks data integrity, and asked the company for more information on its remediation efforts. While the company said it would cease manufacturing and distributing all drugs for the US market until it completes its CAPAs, the agency asked it to update it on when it plans to resume production for US products.

"If you plan to resume any sterile manufacturing operations regulated under the FD&C Act, notify this office before resuming those manufacturing operations," said FDA. "You are responsible for resolving all deficiencies and systemic flaws to ensure your firm is capable of ongoing CGMP compliance.

"In your notification to the Agency, provide a summary of your remediations to demonstrate that you have appropriately completed all CAPA," the agency added.

FDA also sent a warning letter to New Jersey-based InvaDerm for marketing drugs that have not been approved by the agency. The agency said it has not been reviewed for safety and efficacy and therefore does not meet its requirements to be considered generally recognized as safe and effective.

Telehealth GLP-1 marketers

In addition to sending warning letters to drug and device manufacturers, FDA sent warning letters to 25 telehealth companies for marketing compounded GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs, including semaglutide and tirzepatide products. This isn't the first time that the agency has targeted telehealth companies and compounding pharmacies for marketing the popular weight-loss drugs without authorization.

FDA issued warning letters that used boilerplate language, citing the companies for illegally marketing the drugs.

"Compounded drug products are not FDA-approved," said FDA. "Your claims represent that the compounded drug products you offer have been FDA-approved or otherwise evaluated for safety and effectiveness when they have not.

"You are responsible for investigating and determining the root causes of any violations and implementing corrective and preventative measures to ensure future and sustained compliance so that these violations and any others do not occur," the agency added. "It is your responsibility to ensure that your operations comply with all requirements of federal law, including FDA regulations."

https://www.raps.org/resource/fda-cites-companies-for-cgmp-violations-telehealth-firms-for-illegally-marketing-glp-1-drugs.html

US holds off blacklisting China's DeepSeek, more than 100 firms deemed security risks: sources

 The US government has declined to add DeepSeek, the Chinese AI firm that rattled Silicon Valley earlier this year, to its trade blacklists. Despite months of security reviews, congressional legislation, and bans across multiple state governments, federal officials have held off on the kind of sanctions that would formally restrict American companies from doing business with the firm.

More than 100 other entities considered security risks have also avoided being added to the Commerce Department’s Entity List. The decision, or rather the lack of one, comes at a moment when DeepSeek is actively developing its next-generation AI model while US policymakers debate how aggressively to confront China’s rapidly advancing AI capabilities.

A patchwork of restrictions, but no knockout punch

The federal inaction stands in sharp contrast to what’s happened at the state level. Starting in January 2025, states including New York, Texas, and Virginia moved to ban DeepSeek from government systems. Multiple federal agencies followed with their own internal restrictions.

Congress got involved too. In February 2025, lawmakers introduced the No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act, a bill aimed at formalizing restrictions on the firm’s software across government networks.

But that broader commercial response has yet to materialize. When pressed on potential blacklisting actions, US officials have said there is “nothing to announce.” For a firm that has been accused of storing user data in China, allegedly attacking US AI models, and maintaining links to the Chinese military, the restraint is notable.

DeepSeek’s rapid rise and why it matters

To understand the stakes, you need to rewind to early 2025. DeepSeek, backed by the Chinese quant hedge fund High-Flyer, burst onto the global AI scene with models that performed remarkably well despite operating under significant hardware constraints. The company demonstrated that you didn’t necessarily need the most advanced Nvidia chips to build competitive AI, a finding that sent shockwaves through the American tech sector.

That realization triggered a sell-off in AI-related equities in early 2025. Investors weren’t reacting to any specific sanctions. They were pricing in a future where Chinese AI competitors could match or approach American capabilities at a fraction of the cost.

Meanwhile, DeepSeek has continued building. Its V4 model is slated for release in early 2026, which would represent another leap forward for the firm.

What this means for investors

The current situation creates a peculiar kind of uncertainty for anyone with exposure to AI investments. On one hand, the absence of formal blacklisting provides a temporary reprieve. Companies that might otherwise face secondary sanctions risk for interacting with DeepSeek’s ecosystem can continue operating without immediate legal jeopardy.

On the other hand, the threat hasn’t gone away. Discussions about phased escalation are reportedly ongoing, and the legislative groundwork has already been laid. The No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act could serve as a stepping stone to broader restrictions if political winds shift.

The competitive landscape is the other piece worth watching. Every month that DeepSeek operates without formal restrictions is another month it can refine its models, expand its user base, and entrench itself as a viable alternative to American AI platforms. For companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, the competitive threat isn’t hypothetical anymore. It’s shipping product.

https://cryptobriefing.com/us-deepseek-blacklist-security-review/

Fars: Iranian Tankers Cross US Naval Blockade After Trump Deal Allows Iran To Restart Oil Sales

 The first Iranian ships crossed the area of the US naval blockade without obstruction after a memorandum of understanding was reached to end the war between Washington and Tehran, Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency reported Tuesday.

At least three Iranian oil tankers and two cargo ships carrying essential goods broke through the US naval blockade following an accord between the countries. 

A large Iranian VLCC and another vessel used to transport livestock moved from open waters toward Iranian ports, the agency said. Another Iranian tanker carrying oil also crossed the Gulf of Oman toward its designated export port, Fars said, without providing further details about the destination.

The crossing followed a WSJ report that under the agreement expected to formally end the war between the United States and Iran on Friday, Tehran would be allowed to immediately resume oil and fuel sales. The sanctions relief takes effect as soon as the agreement is signed and extends beyond crude exports to include the banking, shipping, and insurance services needed to move those barrels to market.

That detail may prove to be one of the most consequential parts of the entire agreement.

Oil sanctions are only effective if buyers can't pay, tankers can't ship, and insurers won't touch the cargo. By waiving restrictions across the entire supply chain, Washington is effectively giving Iran access to international energy markets from day one rather than months down the road, according to OilPrice.com.

Iran holds some of the world's largest oil and gas reserves and was producing well over 3 million barrels per day before the conflict. Much of that production has remained constrained by sanctions, infrastructure limitations, and wartime disruptions. The prospect of Iranian barrels returning to global markets in meaningful volumes could reshape supply expectations just as consumers and governments remain focused on energy security after months of turmoil in the Middle East.

The move also marks a striking shift in U.S. policy. Washington spent years tightening restrictions on Iran's energy sector. Now, the Trump administration appears prepared to use oil revenues as a financial incentive to secure a lasting end to the conflict.

The oil could potentially start flowing the moment the ink dries without the expected waiting period.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/iranian-tankers-cross-us-naval-blockade-after-trump-deal-allows-iran-restart-oil-sales

Radical Woke Mt Sinai Hospital Exposed: DEI, Child Sex Changes, Epstein Ties Prioritized Over Patients

by Tate Rosentreter via The Center Square;

Consumer protection organization Consumers’ Research began a campaign Monday highlighting New York City-based nonprofit Mount Sinai Hospital's prioritization of what Consumers' calls the hospital's woke and political ideology as well as having what it says are questionable partnerships such as ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Executive director of Consumers’ Research Will Hild told The Center Square that “Mount Sinai is another example of a nonprofit hospital that has seemingly abandoned its core mission of patient care in favor of a radical political agenda.”

“The hospital has a history of prioritizing radical causes like DEI, child sex-change procedures, and climate activism, and has maintained a deeply troubling and disturbing relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, accepting donations and giving him special access to doctors and hospital resources,” Hild said.

“This behavior by nonprofit health systems like Mount Sinai should be investigated for supporting these political agendas at taxpayers' expense,” Hild said.

Hild told The Center Square that “Consumers’ Research is exposing nonprofit hospitals for using taxpayer dollars and federal revenue streams and benefits to put politics over patients.”

Taxpayers and elected officials need to be aware that health systems are misusing their resources and these practices need to be examined by lawmakers,” Hild said.

Mount Sinai media relations has not yet responded to The Center Square’s request for comment.

Included in Consumers’ Research’s campaign are a mobile billboard circling the Mount Sinai campus, a website, and “targeted digital around Capitol Hill.”

The mobile billboard displays statements such as Mount Sinai “performed over 130 sex change procedures on kids,” “provides transgender resources for 8-year-olds,” and has ties to Epstein.

Consumers’ Research’s website campaign goes further in depth, showcasing the hospital’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, transgender ideology promotion, climate activism and “questionable partnerships.”

According to the campaign, Mount Sinai operates an Office for Health Data, Outcomes, and Engagement Strategy “to promote health equity cultural awareness.”

Additionally, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai’s Institute for Health Equity Research “hosted ‘conversations on health equity,’” the campaign revealed.

As far as promoting transgender ideology goes, Mount Sinai’s Keith Haring Youth Gender Center provides care for “transgender and gender diverse youth.

Additionally, the Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery “offers hormone therapy, transgender intervention surgeries, and other services for transgender patients,” Consumers’ Research campaign stated, while transgender resources are provided by Mount Sinai to children “as young as 8-years-old.”

From 2019 to 2023, Mount Sinai performed 139 sex change interventions on minors, according to Do No Harm’s database and Consumers’ Research’s campaign.

As mentioned, Mount Sinai is also involved in climate activism with a statement on its webpage entitled “Sustain Mount Sinai” stating: “Reducing our carbon footprint is not just an operational goal; it is an essential part of building a healthier future.”

Consumers’ Research campaign also outlines Mount Sinai’s “concerning, longstanding” relationship with convicted sex offender Epstein, beginning in 2008 when “after his sex crime conviction, Epstein donated at least $250,000 to Mount Sinai and sponsored various events and projects.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/radical-woke-mount-sinai-hospital-exposed-dei-child-sex-changes-epstein-ties-prioritized