Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Wilding at will — NY’s crime ‘reforms’ let kids sow terror on our streets

 On the sunny last Saturday of March, 6-year-old Inez O’Brien and her mom Ellena headed home to Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn after going out for mother-daughter haircuts.

They exited the J train at Halsey Street, planning to pop into a bodega on their way.

As they passed PS 137, Inez’s school, they saw a group of five pre-teens, all about 11 or 12, who were obviously out to make trouble.

The kids had surrounded a car in the street and were bashing it with the plastic barrels of their Nerf toy guns.

Once the car sped off, the gang looked for a fresh target.

“Let’s get that lady, now!” one shouted.

They swarmed Inez and her mom, shoving the Nerf guns in their faces and firing pellets at painfully close range.

One gun hit Inez in the mouth, bruising her lip.

“Stop, this is scaring us!” Ellena cried, as she pushed the toys away.

But one kid succeeded in whacking Ellena’s head before the group ran off.

Ellena went to the hospital and needed five staples to close the bloody gash.

There, she met a food deliveryman with a punched-in face who had apparently encountered the same kids.

At home, Inez was hysterical.

Her little brother, age 4, saw his mom drenched in blood and vomited.

When patrol officers drove Ellena around the neighborhood, she identified two of the attackers.

One youth — 120 pounds and five-foot-two — was charged with felony assault for pummeling Ellena with “intent to cause serious physical injury.”

Boy is attacked by other teens.
O’Brien was not the first victim attacked by these individuals, as she met a food deliveryman who got punched in the face by the same group of kids.Photodrive – stock.adobe.com

But NYPD’s juvenile desk had to release the adult-sized thug “due to age.”

And that’s it.

No follow-up, and certainly no justice.

“We want accountability,” Ellena’s husband Matt told me.

“What’s going on? It’s a horrible thing that kids can just run up and assault a woman and her child.”

But that’s exactly what New York now encourages.

In recent years, wilding — youths wreaking random, group violence just for the exhilaration of it — has increased because the consequences for it have evaporated.

“There’s more wilding because we made it clear that we will cut kids every break,” a former Bronx prosecutor lamented.

“The system is set up to get kids out of the system.”

In 2018, the statewide “Raise the Age” law largely removed criminal consequences for 16- and 17-year-olds.

Since then, any misdemeanors they commit and 83% of their felonies land in Family Court — including 75% of violent felonies.

The victims of these crimes cannot even discover the outcomes.

Worse, in 2022 Gov. Kathy Hochul signed “Raise the Lower Age,” an insane statute that made offenders between ages 7 and 11 no longer eligible to be charged as “juvenile delinquents.”

Even if an 11-year-old shoots or stabs another kid in front of his school — anything short of a “completed murder” —  he can’t be taken into custody.

What happens to him?

His family gets offered voluntary social services.

That’s it.

“You can’t even put them in a police car — even if they fired a gun,” said Kevin O’Connor, a former NYPD assistant commissioner for youth strategies. “There’s no criminal recourse anymore.”

Because they are no longer processed, we have no idea how many crimes are committed by kids under age 11.

But in 2021, before this law gave youths infinite license to ill, there were 150 such arrests in New York state, including 50 for assault.

The state’s Office of Court and Family Services promises that the new “differential response services” voluntarily offered to young offenders provide “opportunities and supports that promote racial, ethnic, and gender equity, and overall well-being.”

I doubt the two girls in the group that attacked little Inez just needed some good ol’ fashioned “gender equity support” to whip them into shape.

Compounding these “reforms” is a murky family court system that gives the Department of Probation enormous control over youths’ fate.

In Ellena’s case, Probation would have decided whether her sole detained attacker was simply diverted into social services, rather than face any criminal consequences.

How effective are these services?

How often do kids cycle through them?

No. One. Knows.

No wonder NYC’s youth arrests are up 69% over the past five years, while youth felony assault, like Ellena experienced, is up 119%.

That group of kids went home to their beds after a fun day of terrorizing innocent citizens purely for the jollies.

They have no fear of repercussions, reproach or even stigma.

They will do it again.

Meanwhile, Inez couldn’t sleep that night.

She didn’t want to leave her house or go to the park.

New York is choosing to put innocent kids in danger.

Our laws now fail to differentiate between fear that makes the world seem malicious and unstable — like the attack that traumatized Inez — and fear of consequences that enforce societal rules and boundaries.

Inez, and all New York kids, deserve better.

Hannah E. Meyers is a fellow and the director of policing and public safety at the Manhattan Institute.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/opinion/wilding-at-will-nys-reforms-let-kids-sow-terror/

Trump admin, Hochul face off on claimed threat with power over NY appeal judges

 by Miranda Devine

As the New York appellate panel deciding Donald Trump’s appeal of a $480 million fraud penalty drags into its second year, Gov. Hochul stands accused of using her power over state judges to implicitly threaten the president.

White House sources claim Hochul told Trump “I control the judges” during a February meeting in the Oval Office to discuss policy issues such as the Manhattan congestion tax.

Hochul emphatically denies making the statement.

Hochul at a press conference in support of congestion pricing in Manhattan on March 21, 2025.Matthew McDermott
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul allegedly told President Trump that “I control the judges” involved in the appeal of his civil fraud ruling during a February Oval Office meeting.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

But the president, sources said, perceived the conversation as an implicit threat relating to his appeal against a civil fraud ruling in February 2024 by New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron, who ordered Trump to pay $364 million for allegedly inflating his net worth 15 years ago to secure better bank loan terms.

A legal source familiar with the Oval Office discussion said the governor asked the president to drop his opposition to the $9 congestion tax she has imposed on New Yorkers, abandon a gas pipeline he favors and provide federal funding for wind projects and an upgrade of Penn Station.

Hochul is making demands while “keeping the [appeal] hanging over his head,” said the source. “It feels like extortion and blackmail.”

‘Gov never said this’

The governor’s spokesman Avi Small says somebody may have misheard or be lying — and it’s not Hochul.

“Governor Hochul has never said this, or anything similar, to President Trump or anyone,” Small claimed. “The Governor respects the independence of the judiciary, has never attempted to interfere in ongoing cases, and does not have any role to play in the judicial process — nor did she ever say that she did.

“Someone must have completely misheard the governor during this conversation, or they’re purposefully lying to advance a political agenda.”

Hochul at a meeting of governors at the White House on Feb. 21, 2025 — the same day of her Oval Office meeting with Trump.ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

A senior Trump administration official said: “Of course she would deny attempting to extort the president of the United States. Just like she denied overseeing the weaponization of justice in her own state.”

Meanwhile, a Cabinet member present at the one-hour Oval Office meeting did not contradict the president’s recollection of his conversation with Hochul but could not provide details of what was said when contacted by The Post.

Another Cabinet source who did not attend the meeting said Hochul has since tried to ingratiate herself with Trump by offering to rename the Moynihan Train Hall after him.

Hochul allegedly offered to potentially name the Moynihan Train Hall after Trump to win his favor.Christopher Sadowski

In response, Small told The Post that the governor considered the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan a “mentor” and that “under no circumstances would she ever propose changing the name of Moynihan Train Hall.”

He added, however: “The governor did make a lighthearted joke about how to get President Trump interested in contributing federal funds to renovate Penn Station.”

‘Dragging their heels’

The extraordinary 14-month delay in deciding Trump’s appeal is almost three times longer than the average wait in the New York Appellate Division, First Department, according to legal experts.

“In the ordinary course, an appeal in the First Department is decided about five to six months from the date an appellant files an opening brief and record,” says senior appellate counsel Bill White of Counsel Press LLC.

Trump’s lawyers filed his appeal on Feb. 26 last year, and the court held an oral argument hearing in September.

“It is obvious that they are dragging their heels,” says legendary trial attorney Joe Tacopina, who has acted for Trump in other cases.

He calls the 14-month delay “insane and obviously another ‘special treatment’ for Trump.”

He said: “After oral argument or submission, the court usually issues a decision within a couple of months, though it can sometimes take longer depending on the complexity of the case or the court’s docket.”

A spokesman for the Clerk of the Appellate Division, First Department, said: “We don’t discuss pending matters before the court.”

As governor since 2021, Hochul has the authority to appoint judges across various courts. New York’s unique judicial selection system gives her an extraordinary level of control not enjoyed by many other state governors, particularly in the Appellate Division, where there is no need for Senate confirmation, giving her more direct influence.

New York AG Letitia James leaving her house on April 16, 2025 after being referred to the DOJ for criminal charges.Gregory P. Mango

Hochul did not appoint any of the five First Department judges who are deciding Trump’s appeal: Dianne Renwick, David Friedman, Peter Moulton, John Higgitt and Llinét Rosado.

However, Hochul elevated Renwick to presiding justice in 2023, and the other judges rely on ­Hochul to reappoint them every five years.

AG’s taunting

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who sued Trump, his company, and his sons, has taunted the president on social media about the $112,000 daily interest accruing on his penalty, which now exceeds $480 million.

Trump’s lawyers were optimistic after his appeal was heard on Sept. 26, 2024, when some of the judges expressed skepticism about the attorney general’s theory of the case.

Judge Friedman questioned whether the AG’s office had ever before used the same law “to upset a private business transaction,” noting Trump’s transactions were with “some of the most sophisticated actors in business,” like Deutsche Bank.

He noted that nobody “lost any money.”

Judge Moulton said “the immense penalty in this case is troubling” and noted “the parties left these transactions happy.”

He also questioned the AG’s “mission creep,” wondering if the statute had “morphed into something that it was not meant to do?”

Judge Higgitt was concerned that the AG may be “going into an area where she doesn’t have jurisdiction.”

But there has been radio silence from the judges in the seven months since they made those promising comments.

Weaponized justice

If Trump wins, he will still be out of pocket for the costs he incurred securing the bond required to lodge the appeal. In March, the appellate court lowered the bond required from $464 million (the full amount with interest at the time) to $175 million. The only way to recoup his costs, likely to be several million dollars, will be to sue the state of New York.

Trump’s lawyers accused James of weaponizing the New York justice system to target a political adversary and said Judge Engoron demonstrated “tangible and overwhelming” bias during the trial.

James campaigned in 2018 for the position of attorney general on taking down Trump, who she called an “illegitimate president” and an “embarrassment.”

In return, Trump has called her a “racist prosecutor” conducting a “witch hunt” against him.

Weeks after being inaugurated, the president stripped James of her security clearance, barring her from accessing classified information and entering federal facilities like courthouses, US attorneys’ offices or FBI field offices.

Ironically, this week James was referred to the DOJ for criminal charges by the Federal Housing Finance Agency over allegations she committed mortgage fraud by falsifying records to receive favorable loan terms on her properties in Virginia and New York.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/opinion/trump-admin-and-gov-hochul-in-war-of-words-over-explosive-claims-she-threatened-president-with-her-power-over-ny-appeal-judges/

DHS threatens to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students, cancels $2.7M in grants

 The Department of Homeland Security is threatening to revoke Harvard University's ability to enroll foreign students and has canceled grants totaling more than $2.7 million.

The latest action from the Trump administration against Harvard comes on the heels of a $2.2 billion federal funding freeze because the university rejected a list of demands.

DHS demands student records

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem is now demanding detailed records on Harvard's foreign student visa holders' "illegal and violent" activities, or the university will lose Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification. Noem demanded the records by April 30.

The DHS said, "if Harvard cannot verify it is in full compliance with its reporting requirements, the university will lose the privilege of enrolling foreign students."

A letter sent to Harvard last week outlined a series of conditions Harvard needed to meet to maintain a "financial relationship" with the federal government.

Harvard president Alan Garber responded on Monday saying, "The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights."

The demands from the Trump administration included an immediate end to diversity, equity and inclusion policies and discipline for students who violated school policies when a pro-Palestinian tent encampment went up on Harvard Yard. 

In a statement Wednesday, Secretary Noem accused Harvard of "bending the knee to antisemitism." "America demands more from universities entrusted with taxpayer dollars," Noem said.

The DHS said the grants being canceled were the $800,303 Implementation Science for Targeted Violence Prevention grant and the $1,934,902 Blue Campaign Program Evaluation and Violence Advisement grant.

President Trump has also suggested that the Ivy League school should lose its tax-exempt status and be taxed as a political entity.   

https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/trump-harvard-funding-cut-dhs-kristi-noem/