MidEast Peace Big Trouble for the Democrat Party

 by Roger Simon

Is it over for the Democratic (aka Democrat) Party?

No, but it’s close.

Being blamed for the pointless government shutdown, as the public is clearly doing, is bad enough, but meanwhile, President Donald J. Trump has been busy saving the Western world by doing the near impossible, bringing peace to Gaza.

(He has been aided in this endeavor by stellar work from Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, and the remarkable Secretary of State Marco Rubio.)

It’s going to be amusing watching the Democrats’ lackeys in the legacy media do back flips trying to punch holes in this extraordinary peace deal.

Anyone with an IQ in triple digits, and who is honest (note the two requirements), hardly ever believes their reports anymore, but this is on a different level.

Given what Trump has just achieved, it makes the MSM and Capitol Hill Dems look like clown shows. They, particularly the Democrats’ increasingly bizarre Mamdani/AOC left-wing, have been busy running their party into the ground. Trump’s peacemaking allows them to finish the job by making the Democrats seem so kooky by comparison that even extinction now seems a possibility.

Sound excessive? I don’t think so. Listening to cable news tonight, I may have missed something, but I did not hear one Democrat congratulate President Trump on his achievement.

According to Grok, at this writing, even Sen. Chuck Schumer, the minority leader, a Jew, and supposedly a friend of Israel, has said not a word. Terrified of AOC? You bet.

What is wrong with these people? Well, plenty. They are so overwhelmed with hate, for Trump and evidently for each other, that they can’t see straight or think rationally.

They deserve to go.

They should be replaced by two parties—one that is the Mamdani/AOC wing (which will become extinct within a couple of years, if not months), and the other a renewed centrist party that is no longer living in perpetual fear of replacement by the leftists, as they appear to be now. Life will be better for everyone.

Failing that solution, outside of a handful of states and even in some of them, we will soon have a de facto, if not de jure, one-party system, which is not ultimately a healthy thing.

Much of this may come to a head swiftly if Trump wins the Nobel Peace Prize. He clearly deserves it, but in a way I hope he doesn’t, if only because that prize is so besmirched for having been awarded to Barack Obama for no discernible reason other than the most reactionary and superficial—race. (Obama ended up anything but a peacemaker.)

However, if Trump wins, it will give him the ammunition to continue his efforts in the Middle East and Ukraine, which is obviously a very good thing. It’s hard to think of an American president who was and is such a devoted peacemaker.

And, as we all know, they are blessed.

MORE

Perhaps this will even have a spillover into the New York mayoral race, where many Jewish “liberals” (scare quotes highly deliberate) appear, against all logic, to be backing Mr. Mamdani. But with Hamas on the run, Maudani’s goal to “globalize the Intifada” seems more reactionary (and evil) than ever. Will the Upper West Side crowd pick up on this? I have my doubts, but I’m hoping.

UPDATE

This is a time when I don’t particularly like being prescient. Just a few days ago, I posted “Gaza--Genuine Peace or a Hudna?” A hudna, for those who missed it, is a tactical pause to allow Islamic forces to regroup.

Minutes ago, the following was posted by Amir Tsarfati on Instagram:'

Hamas publishes “God, let the ceasefire be like the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah—followed by conquest, like the conquest of Mecca.”

Tsarfati adds: (Context: The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah was a temporary peace agreement signed by Mohammed with the Quraysh tribe, which he later broke before conquering Mecca. The statement implies that Hamas views the ceasefire as a tactical pause before a future “victory” or takeover.)

https://americanrefugees.substack.com/p/mideast-peace-big-trouble-for-the