Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Facing crackdown in Canada, drugmakers offered billions in price cuts

Canadian pharmaceutical industry lobby groups, in an effort to head off a planned crackdown on prescription drug prices, offered to give up C$8.6 billion (£5.1 billion) in revenue over 10 years, freeze prices or reduce the cost of treating rare diseases, according to interviews and documents seen by Reuters.

Those industry offers did not impress federal officials, coming last year as Canada prepared to expand the powers of a little-known federal watchdog called the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) to reduce the cost of prescription drugs.
The government proposals would change the countries Canada compares its prices to, dropping the United States where they are highest, and set a formula to assess cost-effectiveness of medicines.
Announced in 2017, the new rules were scheduled to come into effect last month but have been delayed as the government reviews feedback, which has some wondering if they will ever be implemented.
The delay is a setback for supporters of the changes. But documents detailing counter offers from lobby groups Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada show an industry struggling to win over federal officials.
Unlike other countries with universal healthcare, Canada’s government-funded healthcare system does not cover prescription drugs. Most Canadians rely on an expensive patchwork of public and private insurance plans for that. Among industrialized nations, only the United States and Switzerland spend more on prescriptions per capita.
Declan Hamill, a vice president at Innovative Medicines Canada, said the proposed regulations go too far and could hurt patient access to new drugs in Canada. But his group recognises that the Canadian government wants to make drugs more affordable, he said.
“We’d like to help the government out with that, and we’ve been trying to have discussions with them,” Hamill said.
Lower prices in Canada could eventually hit drugmakers in the most lucrative U.S. market, as Washington evaluates a proposal to base drug prices paid under the government’s Medicare program on the cost of medicines in other developed nations, including Canada.
Global drugmakers, including Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co, Amgen Inc and others, have argued against the Canadian proposal. They referred questions back to Innovative Medicines Canada.
‘WOULD NOT ACHIEVE THE GOAL’
With major drugmakers united in their condemnation of proposed regulations to rein in prices, Health Canada hired former Bank of Canada governor David Dodge and health economist Åke Blomqvist to assess the government proposal. Their review, completed in August 2018, broadly endorsed the government’s plan, documents seen by Reuters showed.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s senior ministers will eventually decide how to proceed. PMPRB Executive Director Douglas Clark told Reuters the new regime could be running by early 2020.
“People have a tendency to presume that the sky is falling,” Clark said. “I think it’s a little early for people to panic and lament the demise of this policy initiative.”
Health Canada said the industry’s offers do not address drug price problems created by outdated rules.
“The non-regulatory counter-proposals that Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada jointly submitted to the government would not achieve the goal of ensuring appropriate consumer protection in these circumstances,” the ministry said in an emailed statement.
One offer was to “secure a price reduction target of C$8.6 billion” in net present value terms, according to a letter from officials seen by Reuters.
Hamill said the C$8.6 billion figure was borrowed from a government estimate of how much the PMPRB reforms would reduce revenue and would have been spread over 10 years. He did not say exactly how it would have worked. Total patented medicine sales were C$16.8 billion ($12.8 billion) in 2017, according to the PMPRB.
Health Canada also rejected an offer to freeze prescription drug prices, saying it would not meet its objective of lowering prices.
Health Canada said the industry had also committed to improving access for patients with rare diseases, but that proposal would not help those who have drug plans.
Meanwhile, ahead of a fall election, Trudeau’s government is preparing to announce a limited expansion of the nation’s universal healthcare system to cover part of the cost of prescription medicines, as drug plans grapple with the extremely high cost of newer speciality drugs.
‘WE DON’T WANT TO SHUT THAT DOOR’
The PMPRB caps prices of drugs still under patent protection. If new regulations are adopted, it would change the list of countries whose drug pricing it uses to decide whether costs are excessive, dropping the United States and adding countries with lower prices.
The regulator would also consider for the first time a type of value-based pricing, measuring how cost-effective drugs are in terms of quality-adjusted life years, and force drug companies to privately disclose some confidential discounts.
It is not entirely clear how the PMPRB would use its new powers. In documents posted online, the agency said it could apply new rules to drugs already on the market. But Health Canada said the regime would not apply to those.
Andrew Casey, president of BIOTECanada, would like “a more rigorous sit-down” with the government.
“I fear the consequences when you do something without really working with industry,” he said. “We don’t want to shut that door.”

Starboard’s Smith: Definitely Interested in Bristol-Myers, Won’t Say Run for Board

– CNBC

WellCare Health Plans (WCG) PT Raised to $305 at Stephens


FDA Approves ANDA for Perrigo’s (PRGO) Acyclovir

https://www.streetinsider.com/FDA/FDA+Approves+ANDA+for+Perrigos+%28PRGO%29+Acyclovir+-+Bloomberg/15084024.html

Merck (MRK) added to BofA/Merrill Lynch US 1 List, Allergan (AGN) Removed


Notable Labs Teams with NonProfit in Pediatric Cancer Partnership

One argument for the high price of some prescription drugs put forth by biopharma companies is due to the significant investments made in taking an asset from a concept, through multiple clinical trials and the regulatory process, all before making it available for sale.
One company though may have found an alternative to offset drug development costs as it moves forward with plans to develop a treatment for a rare form of leukemia and then distribute the drug at a low cost. As Foster City, Calif.-based Notable Labs prepares to initiate clinical testing on its compound ND1000, the company has partnered with the non-profit organization Cures Within Reach to provide a path to distribute the drug to patients. Notable will donate the commercial rights to price, manufacture, and distribute ND-1000 for pediatric leukemia to Cures Within Reach. The nonprofit will then provide the drug to pediatric leukemia patients at a very low cost. Cures Within Reach has a mission to, in part, support the repurposing of a drug for patients.

“The idea of the partnership with Cures Within Reach was born from a conversation on how to do something different to bring a therapy to market that’s affordable for all patients,” Notable Labs Founder Matt De Silva told BioSpace in an exclusive interview.
Through the partnership, Cures Within Reach will be able to use its status as a nonprofit organization to raise funds to help financially support Notable’s clinical development of ND1000. Once the drug makes its way through the clinic, and then potentially through regulatory approval, Notable will then be able to see potential payment because the drug will be eligible for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Pediatric Priority Review Voucher Program. The voucher has a significant financial value and can be sold to other companies, De Silva said.
“The vouchers are really valuable and can be sold to other companies,” De Silva said. He noted that the vouchers can fetch between $60 million and $300 million, which would be suitable compensation for Notable and its other development projects. In total, the company has 15 drugs in development, with ND100 the first into the clinic. De Silva said another blood cancer drug, one for myeloid leukemia, is expected to go into the clinic later this year.
Notable’s ND1000 is a combination drug. It’s a blend of a generic drug already used in cancer patients, one not disclosed, and a natural product that has been used as a treatment for cancer. The natural product was also not disclosed. But, combined, ND-1000 is expected to enhance immunotherapy treatments already in use for these patients, such as CAR-T therapies.  It does so by upregulating three proteins CD-19,-20 and -22. Most of the patients who will benefit from ND1000 have already failed multiple treatment options, so the patient pool is fairly small, only a few hundred in the U.S., De Silva said.
Under the partnership with Cures Within Reach, Notable will keep the proceeds from the FDA voucher and the nonprofit will have the drug for as close to cost as possible, De Silva said. This type of partnership that the two companies have developed is a first-time approach, De Silva said.
Notable Labs, now has 35 employees, was founded by De Silva, a former analyst at noted biotech investor Peter Thiel’s Clarium Capital, nearly five years ago.  De Silva said the concept for the company came out of his experiences caring for his father, who was diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme. None of the approved medications benefitted the elder De Silva and he was not eligible to participate in any clinical trial due to the advanced form of the disease. De Silva said that all of the treatment solutions for his father were sort of a “one-size-fits-all” approach. De Silva wanted to find a way to focus on personalized treatment for individual cancer patients, and Notable Labs was born. The company is currently focused on blood cancers, but De Silva said he still thinks about going after the cancer that killed his father.
“This is just the beginning of our story,” he said.

Pain Therapeutics Criticizes FDA After Meeting Over Thrice-Rejected Remoxy

Investors are not happy after Austin, Texas-based Pain Therapeutics announced that it was no closer to seeing its drug candidate Remoxy ER, an abuse-deterrent, extended-release gel formulation of oxycodone, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The FDA issued a Complete Response Letter in August for the company’s opioid-treatment, Remoxy. The CRL was issued after an advisory committee voted overwhelmingly against approval of Remoxy in June of 2018. In November, Pain Therapeutics announced it planned to meet with the FDA to go over its concerns with the CRL.

As a result of the meeting the company had with regulators on Jan. 31, the company said it is “no closer today to product approval than we were over a year ago.” The company requested the meeting in order to resolve a disagreement around comments and conclusions made by FDA in 2018 during a regulatory review of the New Drug Application for Remoxy. During the meeting, Pain Therapeutics said it learned that the FDA denies that any mathematical errors, material mistakes or misrepresentations were made during a June 2018 advisory committee meeting, despite what the company said was “clear evidence to the contrary.” Pain Therapeutics added that it was told it would need to rely on the Freedom of Information Act to access additional data generated by FDA with Remoxy.
Remi Barbier, president and chief executive officer of Pain Therapeutics, said Remoxy is “an odyssey without a homecoming.” He criticized the FDA’s handling of the meeting. Barbier said the company hoped for a “fair, neutral and impartial review” of the data for Remoxy. However, Barbier claimed he and other company executives “walked out of this meeting feeling a bit disoriented by FDA’s lack of transparency, clarity or helpfulness.” He noted that it was rare when two parties cannot agree on math.
“We can’t work with shambolic regulations. This is not how you win support for innovation,” Barbier said in a statement.
As result, share prices have fallen 10 percent during Tuesday’s trading to $1.08 as of 2:05 p.m.
Barbier noted that the company has spent more than $100 million to develop Remoxy. Over the course of the development, there have been some stumbles. Not only with the most recent FDA rejection, but also a previous rejection from the FDA in 2008. After a series of deals surrounding Remoxy, the drug was resubmitted to the FDA in 2010 and was again rejected. The second time, pharma giant Pfizer was attached to the drug through a licensing deal. Pfizer said it intended to address the issues outlined in the CRL, but then opted to abandon it and give the rights back to Pain Therapeutics, BioSpace reported earlier. Two years ago the FDA kicked Remoxy back to Pain Therapeutics over concerns of potential abuse. That led to the latest request for regulatory approval, which was again rejected by the FDA.
Barbier said this morning that the analgesic efficacy of the drug is not in question, but there is a difference of opinion around the drug’s abuse-deterrent properties. Barbier said the clinical data supports the company’s view of abuse-deterrence, while the FDA argued against the point.
“We are unable to follow the logic by which a drug product should never release the drug. More generally, as the regulatory requirements for Remoxy have changed frequently and suddenly over time, we have experienced significant delays and have incurred unanticipated expenses related to the overall Remoxy development program,” Barbier said.
As the company moves forward, Barbier said Pain Therapeutics will “generally be silent” regarding its plans for Remoxy, “unless a significant material event occurs that compels us to update our public disclosures around this product candidate.” In December, the company moved forward with a Phase II program that could be a potential first-line treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The mid-stage asset, PTI-125, targets an altered form of Filamin A, which some studies show is responsible for multiple pathologies observed in the Alzheimer’s brain.