Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Merck’s Keytruda flunks first-line bladder cancer study

A Phase 3 clinical trial, KEYNOTE-361, evaluating the combination of Merck’s (NYSE:MRK) Keytruda (pembrolizumab) and chemo for the first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (bladder cancer) failed to achieve the primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) compared to chemo alone.
The company says the PD-1 inhibitor demonstrated numerical improvements in PFS and OS but the separations were not statistically significant.
The monotherapy arm was not tested considering the outcome of the combo arm.
No new safety signals were observed.
The FDA has already approved Keytruda for three bladder cancer indications across multiple types and stages.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3581693-mercks-keytruda-flunks-first-line-bladder-cancer-study

AstraZeneca aims to get COVID-19 therapy into clinic in 2 months

AstraZeneca is planning to start a phase 1 clinical trial of a COVID-19 antibody therapy within two months. The commitment follows the signing of a deal that grants AstraZeneca an exclusive license to six anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies identified by researchers at Vanderbilt University.
In April, AstraZeneca outlined a multipronged approach to the discovery of antibodies against the pandemic coronavirus. After receiving the genetic sequences of antibodies identified by Vanderbilt and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, AstraZeneca embarked on a preclinical evaluation that saw it whittle 1,500 prospects down to two molecules that it plans to move into the clinic.
AstraZeneca plans to start testing the two-antibody combination within two months, suggesting an early August start date. The timeline is in keeping with the plans AstraZeneca outlined in April when it set its sights on entering the clinic between July and September.
The two antibodies AstraZeneca plans to test first in humans target different parts of the receptor-binding domain found on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. AstraZeneca thinks hitting two targets may increase efficacy and mitigate the risk that the virus will develop resistance against the therapy.
AstraZeneca has entered into an agreement with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to test that hypothesis. DARPA will support the production of antibodies for testing in phase 1 and the trial itself, boosting AstraZeneca’s hopes of being in the clinic within two months.
With Eli Lilly having already initiated dosing in a clinical trial of its AbCellera-partnered antibody, the timeline puts AstraZeneca just behind the front-runners. However, even if more advanced programs generate positive results, the need for an unprecedentedly broad response against a viral pathogen means there could be room for multiple treatments.
AstraZeneca has consistently highlighted the potential for antibodies to prevent infections with the coronavirus, notably in high-risk people who need extra protection to complement a vaccine and individuals who are ineligible for vaccination. Like its peers, AstraZeneca also sees therapeutic uses for its antibodies but it is putting the prophylactic application front and center.
“By combining two monoclonal antibodies that bind to distinct parts of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into what potentially could be a single preventative therapy, we hope to improve its effectiveness in neutralizing the virus,” AstraZeneca Executive Vice President Mene Pangalos said in a statement.
AstraZeneca is advancing toward that goal in parallel to other companies. Regeneron is targeting a mid-June start date for a clinical trial of its cocktail of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and companies including Amgen and GlaxoSmithKline are also involved in efforts to join Eli Lilly in the clinic.
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/astrazeneca-aims-to-get-covid-19-therapy-into-clinic-2-months

FDA to review nicotine pouches from Altria joint venture

Altria (MO -0.9%) Client Services announces that the FDA has accepted for review marketing applications from joint venture Helix Innovations LLC seeking approval of 35 on! nicotine pouch products.
The company says they are tobacco leaf-free and available in seven flavors and five nicotine levels.
Distribution began at the end of Q1 to over 28K stores, including the top five convenience store chains by volume.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3581664-fda-to-review-nicotine-pouches-from-altria-joint-venture

New National Guidance on Screening for Illicit Drug Use

A national expert task force has issued new guidance on screening for unhealthy drug use in adult patients.
Based on the latest evidence, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that in the primary care setting all patients 18 years of age and older be screened for illicit drug use and misuse of prescription medications.
“Unhealthy drug use can have a devastating impact on people and families, but the good news is that clinicians can do something to help,” Karina W. Davidson, PhD, USPSTF vice chair, told Medscape Medical News.
Davidson is senior vice president of research, and dean of academic affairs, at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Long Island, New York.
The final recommendation was published online June 9 in JAMA.

Referral to Treatment Critical

An estimated 12% of US adults and 8% of adolescents ages 12 to 17 years report unhealthy use of prescription or illegal drugs, one of the most prevalent preventable causes of death, injury, and disability in the United States, said Davidson.
A 2008 report by the USPSTF concluded there was insufficient evidence at that time to recommend universal drug screening for adults or adolescents.
To update this recommendation the task force commissioned reviews of the evidence on screening. They found no randomized controlled trials examining outcomes of screening versus not screening in asymptomatic adult patients with no diagnosis of drug abuse.
Screening adults, including pregnant women, involves asking one or more questions about drug use or drug-related risks in a face-to-face, print, or audio-visual format. It does not involve urine, saliva, or blood testing for the presence of drugs. The new recommendation does not pertain to patients already diagnosed with a substance use disorder.
Other reviews examined the accuracy of available screening tests and evidence that interventions reduce related negative outcomes.
“We found many more short, reasonable, and valid screener tests showed evidence that interventions work to either improve abstinence or reduce relapse,” said Davidson.
The investigators concluded that screening for unhealthy drug use in adults has “moderate net benefit” but only when diagnostic and treatment services are available.
“We did not find evidence that screening alone, without effective treatment, is beneficial,” said Davidson.
“Clinicians should ensure they have the appropriate referrals for diagnostic work-up and effective treatment, and that they have those ready at hand if someone does screen positive.”
Davidson acknowledged that screening in adults may have potential “complications” that could lead to unintended harms including privacy issues, discouraging patients who don’t want to be screened from seeking healthcare, and possible medical and sociolegal consequences of reporting positive screening results.
“We propose that primary care clinicians understand their local, state, and national reporting regulations so they know what consequences may or may not accrue to a patient,” said Davidson.
She also noted that regulations differ across jurisdictions and that some have mandatory reporting of drug abuse.
However, in general, “asking patients if they have a problem, and connecting them to the treatment they need, results in benefit,” she said.

No Teen Screening

The USPSTF did not find enough evidence to be able to assess the benefits and harms of screening for unhealthy drug use in adolescents.
It concluded that for adolescents the evidence is still insufficient, and so the benefits and harms of drug screening in teens can’t be determined at this time.
That’s not to say that unhealthy drug use among teens is not a major public health problem, said Davidson. Indeed, the evidence review suggests it is one of the most preventable causes of morbidity and mortality for adolescents.
Unfortunately, Davidson said, almost none of the many screening tests the task force examined had been investigated in more than one study, she said.
Nevertheless, she added, this doesn’t preclude physicians from asking young patients about drug use.
“We encourage physicians to decide for themselves what is best to do while we call for more research” in this area, said Davidson.
The investigators note that pharmacotherapy, often provided with individual or group counseling, is the standard treatment for opioid use disorders.
Disorders involving use of cannabis, stimulants, and other nonopioid drugs, are usually treated with psychosocial interventions that involve behavioral approaches, including cognitive behavioral therapy.
The investigators also note that managing patients who screen positive for unhealthy drug use is commonly accompanied by other interventions, including testing for blood-borne pathogens; assessment of alcohol and tobacco use, misuse, and dependence; screening for comorbid mental health disorders; and pain assessment in patients abusing opioids.
“It’s unclear how often clinicians should screen for unhealthy drug use in adults. This is one of the areas where we have called for further research,” said Davidson.
The USPSTF is an independent, voluntary body. The US Congress mandates that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) support the operations of the USPSTF. Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the US government. They should not be construed as an official position of AHRQ or the US Department of Health & Human Services.
JAMA. 2020;323:2301-2309. Full text
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/932016#vp_1

American Cancer Society Update: ‘It Is Best Not to Drink Alcohol’

In its updated cancer prevention guidelines, the American Cancer Society (ACS) now recommends that “it is best not to drink alcohol.”
Previously, ACS suggested that for those who consume alcoholic beverages, intake should be no more than 1 drink per day for women or 2 per day for men. That recommendation is still in place, but is now accompanied by this new, stronger directive.
The guidelines, revised for the first time since 2012, also place more emphasis on reducing the consumption of processed and red meat and highly processed foods, and on increasing physical activity.
Commenting on the guidelines, Steven K. Clinton, MD, PhD, associate director of the Center for Advanced Functional Foods Research and Entrepreneurship at the Ohio State University, Columbus, explained that he didn’t view the change in alcohol as that much of an evolution. “It’s been 8 years since they revised their overall guidelines and during that time frame, there has been an enormous growth in the evidence that has been used by many organizations,” he said.
But importantly, there is also a call for action from public, private, and community organizations to work to together to increase access to affordable, nutritious foods and physical activity.
“Making healthy choices can be challenging for many, and there are strategies included in the guidelines that communities can undertake to help reduce barriers to eating well and physical activity,” said Laura Makaroff, DO, American Cancer Society senior vice president.
The guidelines were published today in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.
The link between cancer and lifestyle factors has long been established, and for the past 4 decades both government and leading nonprofit health organizations, including the ACS and the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR), have released cancer prevention guidelines and recommendations that focus on managing weight, diet, physical activity, and alcohol consumption.
In 2012 the ACS issued guidelines on diet and physical activity, and their current guideline is largely based on the WCRF/AICR systematic reviews and Continuous Update Project reports, which were last updated in 2018. The ACS guidelines also incorporated systematic reviews conducted by the International Agency on Cancer Research (IARC) and the US Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services (USDA/HHS), and other analyses that were published since the WCRF/AICR recommendations were released.

Emphasis on Three Areas

The differences between the old guidelines and the update do not differ dramatically, but Makaroff highlighted a few areas that have increased emphasis.
An area that Makaroff highlighted is alcohol, where the recommendation is to avoid or limit consumption. “The current update says not to drink alcohol, which is in line with the scientific evidence, but for those people who choose to drink alcohol, to limit it to one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men.”
Thus, the change here is that the previous guideline only recommended limiting alcohol consumption, whereas the update suggests that, optimally, it should be avoided completely.
Time spent being physically active is critical. The recommendation has changed to encourage adults to engage in 150 to 300 minutes (2.5 to 5 hours) of moderate-intensity physical activity, or 75 to 150 minutes (1.25 to 2.5 hours) of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or an equivalent combination, per week. Achieving or exceeding the upper limit of 300 minutes is optimal.
“That is more than what we have recommended in the past, along with the continued message that children and adolescents engage in at least 1 hour of moderate- or vigorous-intensity activity each day,” she told Medscape Medical News.
The ACS has also increased emphasis on reducing the consumption of processed and red meat. “This is part of a healthy eating pattern and making sure that people are eating food that is high in nutrients that help achieve and maintain a healthy body weight,” said Makaroff.
A healthy diet should include a variety of dark green, red, and orange vegetables; fiber-rich legumes; and fruits with a variety of colors and whole grains, according to the guidelines. Sugar-sweetened beverages, highly processed foods and refined grain products should be limited or avoided.
The revised dietary recommendations reflect a shift from a “reductionist or nutrient-centric” approach to one that is more “holistic” and that focuses on dietary patterns. In contrast to a focus on individual nutrients and bioactive compounds, the new approach is more consistent with what and how people actually eat, ACS points out.
The ACS has also called for community involvement to help implement these goals: “Public, private, and community organizations should work collaboratively at national, state, and local levels to develop, advocate for, and implement policy and environmental changes that increase access to affordable, nutritious foods; provide safe, enjoyable, and accessible opportunities for physical activity; and limit alcohol for all individuals.”

No Smoking Guns

Clinton noted that the guidelines are consistent with the whole body of current scientific literature. “It’s very easy to go to the document and look for the ‘smoking gun’ ­— but the smoking gun is really not one thing,” he said. “It’s a pattern, and what dieticians and nutritionists are telling people is that you need to orchestrate a healthy lifestyle and diet, with a diet that has a foundation of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and modest intake of refined grains and meat. You are orchestrating an entire pattern to get the maximum benefit.”
Makaroff is an employee of the ACS. Clinton has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
CA Cancer J Clin. Published online June 9, 2020. Full text
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/931995#vp_1

Malaysia to continue using hydroxychloroquine on Covid-19 patients

The Malaysian health ministry said it will continue to use hydroxychloroquine on Covid-19 patients despite the World Health Organization (WHO) suspending clinical trials of the drug as a potential treatment for the disease.
Health director-general Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah, however, stressed that health authorities were using it “off label” which, he had explained previously, meant it was not recommended.
“Hydroxychloroquine is not a treatment but it can delay or stop the progression into Category 4 and 5. And maybe that’s why we are seeing a low mortality rate,” he said at his daily briefing here today.
Hydroxychloroquine has been commonly used for treatment of malaria for the last 40 years.
Last month, WHO suspended clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine as a precaution after a study suggested the drug could increase the risk of death among Covid-19 patients.
Noor Hisham also said the ministry was using lopinavir and ritonavir, which are widely used for the treatment and prevention of HIV and AIDS, on Covid-19 patients “off label”.
He explained that the ministry was placing children below 12 under the “high risk” group for Covid-19 infections due to immunity concerns.
“Their immunity may differ, sometimes they are not immune, and it is important to look into it,” he said.
He said while there were no Covid-19 mortalities of children under 12, it was the ministry’s role “to protect the children”.
He was asked why children below 12 were classified as a high risk group despite local and international data showing they were less likely to get infected or die from the disease.
https://www.msn.com/en-my/news/national/govt-to-continue-using-hydroxychloroquine-on-covid-19-patients/ar-BB15fhb4?li=BBr8Hnu

Flu shot makers gear up, get creative, for critical vaccination season

With the novel coronavirus continuing its global spread and a second wave threatening the United States later this year, experts worry an influx of influenza patients and COVID-19 patients will hit U.S. hospitals at the same time.
All the more reason to push flu shots—and pharma’s working to ramp up not only for the increased demand but also for the logistical challenges of vaccinating millions of people during a pandemic.
Manufacturers distributed about 170 million flu vaccine doses to the U.S. last year. This year, they’re aiming to increase that by about 20 million, Elaine O’Hara, Sanofi Pasteur’s North America head of commercial operations, told FiercePharma. Vaccine makers are already producing their doses, with plans to start shipping later this summer.
Later this year, companies, health officials and patient advocates plan to encourage flu vaccination to serve two public health goals—to reduce the risk of simultaneous infections or consecutive infections, and to reduce the burden on healthcare systems, said Seqirus’ David Ross, VP of commercial operations in North America.
“Flu immunization is not a distraction from the COVID battle,” Ross said. “It’s a primary tool in this battle.”
COVID-19 is a “very fast and very elusive” pathogen that could devastate healthcare systems when combined with a medium or worse flu season, O’Hara said. CDC director Robert Redfield has been raising alarms over a combination of flu and coronavirus outbreaks this fall and winter, and again reminded a House of Representatives committee about the threat last week.
“In the name of public health, it is so important for people to get vaccinated this year,” O’Hara said.
Sanofi is getting ready to ship up to 80 million flu vaccine doses this year, she said—an increase from 70 million last year. Seqirus shipped 52 million doses last year, and it’s planning to increase that number by about 10% for the coming season, Ross said. GlaxoSmithKline, the third major flu vaccine player, shipped 46 million doses last year and is planning to ship 50 million this year, a spokesman said.

Challenges to vaccination

But even as flu vaccines carry increased importance this year, getting them to people—and increasing the number of overall vaccinations—will be tougher because of social distancing measures, experts said.
O’Hara said she fears a “perfect storm” of a new wave of COVID-19 spooking people into isolation again—even when that includes avoiding a flu shot. Sanofi is working with health systems, doctors and others to provide “best practices” for administering vaccines during the pandemic. Those could include curbside or parking lot immunizations, one-way traffic in clinics, and more, she said.
There are encouraging signs from Australia, Ross said. The country, which is in the midst of its vaccination effort, is seeing higher rates of immunization amid the pandemic thanks to “creative solutions.”
What changes can Americans expect changes to routine flu vaccinations this year? They could include clinics set up in parking lots, parks or community centers to allow for appropriate distancing between people. Plus, flu vaccinations could start earlier and go later than usual, Ross said.
Experts want to do whatever it takes to make sure flu vaccines aren’t wasted, O’Hara said. During the H1N1 pandemic, many doses were eventually discarded, she said.
“We’re really trying to prevent that from happening,” she said.
https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/flu-vaccines-take-even-more-importance-amid-covid-19-but-challenges-await-experts