Search This Blog

Tuesday, March 9, 2021

T-Cell Responses Hold Up Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: Study

 There is remarkable news regarding the immune response to SARS-CoV-2. It is clear now that the virus mutates to evade the neutralizing antibody responses. There are new results that suggest that is not the whole story. When it comes to another arm of immunity, T-cell immunity, high response to one form of the virus means high response to them all. Here we will review what that might mean for the future of Covid-19.

In the months since SARS-CoV-2 variants came to the forefront of Covid-19 discussion, the average person is left with a number of questions. Will the vaccine my grandmother just received protect her from emerging strains? What about my previous infection during the summer? How long might that protection last?

Vaccines and prior infections confer antibodies, which are proteins produced by B-cells to counteract a specific antigen. Picture a custom couture tailored to you. The fabric aligns perfectly with every inch of your torso. An antibody is like a tailor-made protein that fits a specific pathogen, in this case, SARS-CoV-2. However, ample research indicates that these antibodies fade rather quickly over time, and may not protect as well against some variants. Though as it turns out, B-cells and antibodies are only half the adaptive immunity puzzle. 

The other piece is the T-cell. These are types of white blood cells in the immune system which act as the front-line soldiers against disease. Their purpose is to eliminate invading pathogens and clean up dead cellular debris. They do this by remembering past infections, waiting to encounter short amino acid sequences of the virus called peptides, then killing the virus when it reappears. Whereas antibodies are tailor-made proteins for a specific virus, T-cells attack a range of different pathogens, like a suit purchased off the rack. It may not quite fit exactly, but close enough will do and it will fit many others as well.

The T-cell is another tool in the arsenal against Covid-19, but the questions above must be translated in reference to this secondary weapon. Will T-cells protect against rapidly emerging variants of the virus that show signs of resistance to antibodies? Research from the La Jolla Institute of Immunology, led by Dr. Alessandro Sette and Dr. Shane Crotty, sought to illuminate these unknowns.

Their findings were encouraging. When exposing human T-cells from a wide range of hosts previously infected with Covid-19 to a number of SARS-CoV-2 variants, the T-cell response held up well. Responses decreased at most 30% relative to that cell’s response to the SARS-CoV-2 wild type. In some cases, such as the South Africa variant, T-cells produced a nearly equal response to the variant as the unmutated virus.

The same can be said for samples pulled from people vaccinated against Covid-19. Their T-cells responded in an equal or slightly decreased volume in comparison to the wild type. This is a major victory, confirming that T-cells have some effect in slowing mutated variants down, but to what extent?

There are strengths and weaknesses to the T-cell response. The strength, as shown by these researchers, is the blanket coverage they have over the variants. The virus is adaptive and mutative—changing over time. When we introduce antibodies specific to the virus, it has shown an ability to develop mutations to the receptor-binding domain, n-terminal domain, or elsewhere, that renders the antibody less effective. With T-cells, because everyone has their own unique hereditary set rather than one specific developed antibody from a vaccine or previous infection, the virus cannot adapt.

The weakness, however, is that T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 are limited. T-cells are not designed to prevent infection, only to kill the cells once they are in the body. The researchers confirm this by concluding that “while it is not anticipated that circulating memory T cells would be effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is plausible that they can reduce Covid-19 severity.”

Given all this, it may be the case that SARS-CoV-2 is allowing a certain level of T-cell response. Variants evolved while T-cells were present, prompting the idea that viruses are modulating the T-cell response to low enough levels for them to continue to spread. While mostly speculative, it seems possible that the virus could have regulatory influence on the T-cell.

Regardless, T-cell reactivity in the face of variant forms of SARS-CoV-2 is an unmitigated positive. The implication is that those vaccinated or previously infected will have at least some form of defense against newly circulating variants, even if they are capable of evading antibodies. This is much needed positive news in the face of the growing variant threat.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2021/03/08/t-cell-responses-hold-up-against-sars-cov-2-variants-study-finds/

Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine neutralizes Brazil variant in lab study

 The Pfizer coronavirus vaccine is able to neutralize a rapidly spreading virus variant from Brazil, according to a new laboratory study.

Researchers developed an engineered version of the COVID-19 mutation and found that blood samples taken from people who received the vaccine were able to neutralize the variant, according to the study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Monday.

The scientists from Pfizer, BioNTech, and the University of Texas Medical Branch said the vaccine was roughly as effective against the Brazilian variant as other less contagious virus versions from last year.

Earlier studies found that the UK and South Africa COVID-19 variants were also neutralized by the Pfizer vaccine.

But the South African variant, according to studies, may diminish protective antibodies induced by the vaccine.

Pfizer said it is planning additional tests on the South African variant.

https://nypost.com/2021/03/08/pfizers-covid-vaccine-neutralizes-brazil-variant-in-lab-study/

Novartis' Canakinumab Fails To Improve Survival In Late-Stage Lung Cancer Trial

 Novartis AG (NYSE: NVS) reported data from the Phase 3 CANOPY-2 study evaluating canakinumab (ACZ885) in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

  • The study did not meet the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS).
  • The trial evaluated canakinumab plus chemotherapy agent docetaxel in adults with NSCLC whose disease progressed while on or after previous platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitor immunotherapy.
  • Canakinumab development program continues with two Phase 3 CANOPY trials, evaluating the antibody in first-line and adjuvant settings.
  • Novartis and CANOPY-2 investigators will analyze the study data and are expected to submit the findings for presentation at an upcoming medical meeting.
  • Canakinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that could enhance anti-tumor immune response and reduce tumor cell proliferation, survival, and invasiveness.

Takeda pulls the trigger on Maverick buyout

 Takeda tapped Maverick Therapeutics and its T-cell engager platform in early 2017 to create new treatments for previously undruggable cancer targets. The $125 million deal also had a 5-year buyout option, which Takeda is now exercising for an undisclosed upfront fee and up to $525 million in development and regulatory milestones. 

Takeda will pick up Maverick’s COBRA platform and the pipeline the company has built around it, including lead candidate MVC-101, now known as TAK-186, which is in a phase 1/2 study in solid tumors that express EGFR. The Japanese pharma will also get its hands on MVC-280, now TAK-280, which is poised to enter the clinic in patients with B7H3-expressing solid tumors. Takeda expects to begin that trial in the second half of its 2021 financial year, which runs from April 2021 to March 2022. 

The duo expects to wrap the deal in the April to June time frame, the companies said in a statement Tuesday. Upon closing, Maverick employees will become part of Takeda’s R&D unit. 

The COBRA platform is designed to work only in the tumor microenvironment, so treatments can zero in on various kinds of solid tumors while sparing healthy tissues. This sets Maverick’s approach apart from standard T-cell engager treatments that are given systemically.  

“Collaboration is paramount to our R&D strategy and our pursuit of novel approaches to treat cancer,” said Chris Arendt, Ph.D., head of the oncology therapeutic area unit at Takeda, in a statement.  

“Maverick’s cutting-edge COBRA platform is an exciting addition to our oncology portfolio that provides a novel conditional bioengineering approach to advance redirected immunotherapies against solid tumors,” Arendt added. 


The acquisition comes barely a week after Takeda regained the global rights to soticlestat, a drug it had farmed out to Ovid Therapeutics for clinical development. Ovid took the lead on developing it for a group of rare epilepsies, including Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, taking it through phase 2 before Takeda took it back for $196 million upfront. 

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/from-partner-to-part-family-takeda-pulls-trigger-maverick-buyout

VBI Vaccines Starts Enrollment in Phase 1/2 Study of COVID-19 Vaccine

 - Initial data from Phase 1 of the study expected by the end of Q2 2021, subject to rate of enrollment

- Adaptive Phase 1/2 study supported by previously announced contribution from Strategic Innovation Fund of Canadian Government of up to CAD$56 million

- Initiation of Phase 1/2 study of pan-coronavirus vaccine candidate, VBI-2901, anticipated later in 2021

 

VBI Vaccines Inc. (Nasdaq: VBIV) (VBI), a biopharmaceutical company driven by immunology in the pursuit of powerful prevention and treatment of disease, today announce the initiation of enrollment of its Phase 1/2 clinical study of VBI-2902, the Company’s monovalent enveloped virus-like particle (eVLP) COVID-19 vaccine candidate.

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/vbi-vaccines-announces-initiation-of-enrollment-in-adaptive-phase-1-2-study-of-prophylactic-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-vbi-2902/

Monday, March 8, 2021

Federal Employees Get $1,400 Per Week – If Kids Not Full-Time in School

 Call it a personal bailout for bureaucrats.

The “American Rescue Plan Act of 2021” – a $1.9 trillion emergency aid package to help America recover from the coronavirus pandemic has an extra perk for federal workers: Enhanced paid time off if your child is enrolled in a school that isn’t back to full-time, in-classroom instruction.

The new perk is funded through a new $570 million family leave account exclusively for federal workers.

Full-time federal employees can take up to 600 hours in paid leave until September 30, up to $35 an hour and $1,400 a week. That is 15 weeks for a 40-hour employee. Part-time and “seasonal” employees are eligible, too, with equivalent hours established by their agency.

In 78 large agencies, the average federal worker already made $100,000+ in cash compensation and received 43 days of paid-time-off (PTO). Our auditors at OpenTheBooks.com estimate that existing PTO perk costs the American taxpayer $20 billion every year.While millions of parents struggle to work from home with kids who are enrolled in shuttered or partially-shuttered schools, and while millions more left the workforce or lost jobs to care for their at-home children, evidently parents in the federal bureaucracy need their own, personal Covid-19 bailout.

Here is how a federal employee “caring for a son or daughter” qualifies for the paid leave, specifically:

“if the school or place of care of the son or daughter has been closed, if the school of such son or daughter requires or makes optional a virtual learning instruction model or requires or makes optional a hybrid of in-person and virtual learning instruction models, or the childcare provider of such son or daughter is unavailable, due to Covid-19 precautions...”

The American Rescue Act provided regular Americans – individuals – a one-time $1,400 payment. Federal workers with kids not in school full-time can now receive $1,400 per week – for 15 weeks – up to $21,000!

How is that fair to the hardworking taxpayer?

https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2021/03/08/federal_employees_get_1400_per_week__if_kids_not_full-time_in_school_766557.html

Surge in COVID-positive migrants being released in US

 The number of migrants testing positive for the coronavirus before being released into the US by the Border Patrol is surging, almost doubling the amount from last week, according to a report. ​​

Felipe Romero, a spokesman for Brownsville, Texas, said 185 migrants rapid-tested at the city’s main bus station showed they were infected with COVID-19, ​up from the 108 who tested positive last week, Fox News reported Monday.

Since Jan. 25, 1,553 individuals have been tested for coronavirus after crossing the US border there, he said. 

​​Romero said there’s little that Brownsville can do to restrict the migrants from ​traveling beyond Texas other than advising them to follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention safety precautions and quarantine. 

Migrants who were once held ​i​n border camps while they were being processed in the courts for entry are no longer detained as part of the Biden administration rolling back former President Donald Trump’s immigration policy.

“The president of the United States, Biden, helps the people because it’s necessary, you know,” Mario, a Honduran migrant who spent eight months at a camp with his family ​and is still awaiting entry to the US, told Fox News.

Thousands of illegal immigrants are being set free across the country as the crisis on the southern border escalates — and the White House admitted Monday it isn’t doing enough to discourage people from seeking unlawful entry to the United States.

Speaking to reporters during a press briefing, White House press secretary Jen Psaki acknowledged the failures after being pressed about the administration’s handling of the situation.

“I would say it’s clear we need to work more on getting the message out and being very clear, now is not the time to come,” said Psaki, before reiterating the Biden administration’s claim that “the majority of people who come to the border are turned away.”

“Yes, we have changed the policies of the last administration as it relates to unaccompanied children, but the majority of families, adults, the vast, vast majority are turned away at the border. And that is a message that clearly we need to continue to look for means and ways of getting out, you know, more and more out to the region,” she continued.

Her comments followed the revelation that under President Biden, the Department of Homeland Security will convert two immigrant family detention centers in South Texas into Ellis Island-style rapid processing facilities, and has already emptied a facility in Pennsylvania. 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement wrote in a court filing last Friday that while families continue to be detained at its locations in Karnes City and Dilley, adults and children are all released within 72 hours.

https://nypost.com/2021/03/08/surge-in-covid-positive-migrants-being-released-in-us/