Search This Blog

Saturday, March 5, 2022

AMA statement on Administration’s test-to-treat COVID-19 plan

 Statement attributable to:

Gerald E. Harmon, M.D.
President, American Medical Association

“While the administration laid out promising plans earlier this week to combat COVID-19 and put measures in place to prevent future pandemics, the pharmacy-based clinic component of the test-to-treat plan flaunts patient safety and risks significant negative health outcomes. This approach, though well intentioned in that it attempted to increase access to care for patients without a primary care physician, oversimplifies challenging prescribing decisions by omitting knowledge of a patient’s medical history, the complexity of drug interactions, and managing possible negative reactions.

“For starters, Paxlovid is 88 percent effective at preventing hospitalization and death. But it also has six pages of drug interactions, including interactions that may require a patient to hold, change, or reduce doses of other medications. Molnupiravir, the other oral antiviral medication, is not authorized for people under 18 because it can affect bone and cartilage growth, and it should not be used during pregnancy or while breastfeeding.

“The AMA is pleased the administration is ramping up supply of antivirals so in the near future they will be broadly available. But, in the meantime, establishing pharmacy-based clinics as one stop shopping for COVID-19 testing and treatments is extremely risky. Pharmacy-based clinics typically treat simple illnesses such as strep throat. Yet, COVID-19 is a complex disease and there are many issues to consider when prescribing COVID-19 antiviral medications. Leaving prescribing decisions this complex in the hands of people without knowledge of a patient’s medical history is dangerous in practice and precedent. We urge patients who test positive for COVID-19 to contact their physician to discuss treatment options. COVID-19 is not strep throat—it is a complicated disease that has killed nearly 1 million people in the United States.

“The COVID-19 vaccines work. These antivirals can work when taken properly and timely. After two years of this pandemic, we have the tools at hand to prevent severe outcomes from and treat COVID-19. But we must marshal our resources smartly and effectively, which means under the guidance and supervision of physicians with expertise to deal with complex medications.”

https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-statement-administration-s-test-treat-covid-19-plan

Hydrogen-oxygen therapy alleviates clinical symptoms in twelve patients hospitalized with COVID-19

 Luo, Peng MSa; Ding, Yuanfang MSb; He, Yuan PhDc; Chen, Dafeng PhDd; He, Qing MSc; Huang, Zufeng MSa,b; Huang, Shiana,∗Lei, Wei PhDa,c,d

DOI: doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027759

Abstract

A global public health crisis caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) leads to considerable morbidity and mortality, which bring great challenge to respiratory medicine. Hydrogen-oxygen therapy contributes to treat severe respiratory diseases and improve lung functions, yet there is no information to support the clinical use of this therapy in the COVID-19 pneumonia.

A retrospective study of medical records was carried out in Shishou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Hubei, China. COVID-19 patients (aged ≥ 30 years) admitted to the hospital from January 29 to March 20, 2020 were subjected to control group (n = 12) who received routine therapy and case group (n = 12) who received additional hydrogen-oxygen therapy. The clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients were analyzed. The physiological and biochemical indexes, including immune inflammation indicators, electrolytes, myocardial enzyme profile, and functions of liver and kidney, were examined and investigated before and after hydrogen-oxygen therapy.

The results showed significant decreases in the neutrophil percentage and the concentration and abnormal proportion of C-reactive protein in COVID-19 patients received additional hydrogen-oxygen therapy.

This novel therapeutic may alleviate clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients by suppressing inflammation responses.

https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/Fulltext/2022/03040/Hydrogen_oxygen_therapy_alleviates_clinical.1.aspx

'Test-to-treat' program too narrow, pharmacists say

 The White House's "test-to-treat" program should be expanded to include more pharmacies, the American Pharmacists Association said March 3.

The initiative, announced March 1, involves using pharmacy-based clinics as "one-stop shops" where people who receive a positive COVID-19 test result can be seen by a clinician and receive antiviral therapy, all in one visit. The White House said hundreds of one-stop sites will be made available nationwide in March.

"Although we are pleased the administration recognizes the access and care pharmacies provide, we are disappointed that the current plan is narrow and does not enable any willing and able pharmacy to be a 'test-to-treat' pharmacy through this initiative," the association said. "We hope to see this program expand as the supply of COVID-19 oral antivirals increases, thereby allowing more pharmacies to participate, providing broader access to care."

The group also said it will continue to work with the federal government to eliminate barriers that prevent pharmacists from prescribing antivirals or receiving appropriate reimbursement.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/pharmacy/test-to-treat-program-too-narrow-pharmacists-say.html

CVS eyes trademarks in the metaverse for its pharmacy, health clinics

 CVS Health filed a trademark application Feb. 28 that would allow the company to provide healthcare services in the metaverse, CNBC reported March 4.

In CVS Health's filing with the U.S. Patent Trade Office, the company stated it is looking to trademark its logo, establish an online store and create downloadable virtual goods such as prescription drugs, health, wellness, beauty and personal care products. 

The filing also contained details about CVS seeking to bring its health services it provides in its in-store clinics, its telehealth platform, non-emergency medical treatment services and wellness programs to the virtual platform.

The company is the first to file for a virtual healthcare clinic in the metaverse, according to trademark attorney Josh Gerben.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/disruptors/cvs-eyes-trademarks-in-the-metaverse-for-its-pharmacy-health-clinics.html

892 hospitals at risk of closure, state by state

 More than 500 rural hospitals in the U.S. are at immediate risk of closing because of financial losses and lack of financial reserves to sustain operations, according to a report from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform. 

Nearly every state has at least one rural hospital at immediate risk of shutting down. In 21 states, 25 percent or more of rural hospitals were at immediate risk, according to the report. 

The hospitals identified as being at immediate risk of closure had either low or non-existent financial reserves and a cumulative negative total margin over the most recent three-year period.

Across the U.S., 892 hospitals — more than 40 percent of all rural hospitals in the country — are either at immediate or high risk of closure. The more than 300 hospitals at high risk of closure either have lower financial reserves or high dependence on nonpatient service revenues such as local taxes or state subsidies, according to the report. 

Here are the number and percentage of rural hospitals at risk of closing in each state as of January based on the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform analysis: 

Alabama
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 30 (65 percent) 

Alaska
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 5 (38 percent) 

Arizona
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 5 (28 percent) 

Arkansas
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 30 (61 percent) 

California
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 17 (33 percent) 

Colorado
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 11 (27 percent) 

Connecticut
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 3 (100 percent) 

Delaware
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 0 (0 percent) 

Florida
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 7 (35 percent) 

Georgia
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 26 (43 percent) 

Hawaii
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 8 (67 percent) 

Idaho
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 7 (24 percent) 

Illinois
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 20 (28 percent) 

Indiana
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 20 (38 percent) 

Iowa
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 40 (44 percent) 

Kansas
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 76 (73 percent) 

Kentucky
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 16 (23 percent) 

Louisiana
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 26 (54 percent) 

Maine
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 10 (40 percent) 

Maryland
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 1 (25 percent) 

Massachusetts
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 2 (40 percent) 

Michigan
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 19 (31 percent) 

Minnesota
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 28 (31 percent) 

Mississippi
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 41 (63 percent) 

Missouri
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 31 (53 percent) 

Montana
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 19 (37 percent) 

Nebraska
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 23 (32 percent) 

Nevada
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 6 (46 percent) 

New Hampshire 
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 4 (24 percent) 

New Jersey
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 0 (0 percent) 

New Mexico
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 5 (22 percent) 

New York
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 29 (58 percent) 

North Carolina
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 18 (35 percent) 

North Dakota
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 16 (43 percent) 

Ohio
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 19 (27 percent) 

Oklahoma
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 42 (58 percent) 

Oregon
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 11 (34 percent) 

Pennsylvania
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 16 (40 percent) 

Rhode Island
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 0 (0 percent) 

South Carolina
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 12 (48 percent) 

South Dakota
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 11 (24 percent) 

Tennessee
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 26 (55 percent) 

Texas
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 81 (55 percent) 

Utah 
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 3 (14 percent)

Vermont
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 2 (15 percent) 

Virginia
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 14 (52 percent) 

Washington
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 20 (50 percent)

West Virginia
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 12 (50 percent) 

Wisconsin
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 16 (22 percent) 

Wyoming
Rural hospitals at risk of closing: 8 (33 percent) 

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/892-hospitals-at-risk-of-closure-state-by-state.html

BCBS Minnesota files lawsuit against COVID-19 lab for price inflation, fraudulent billing

 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota is suing Omaha, Neb.-based COVID-19 testing lab GS Labs, Twin Cities Pioneer Press reported March 1.

The insurer claims GS Labs inflated the price of its most common test up to five times the market value, the report said. The lab is also alleged to have fraudulently administered unnecessary tests to drive up billing.

GS Labs spokesperson David Leibowitz said the lawsuit amounted to "strong-arm gamesmanship," and that Blue Cross owes the company more than $1 million for tens of thousands of tests, the report said.

"GS Labs has followed federal law to the letter," Mr. Leibowitz said, according to the report. "Our posted cash price for COVID tests is in line with the marketplace across the U.S. and we have been paid that price or a negotiated rate by numerous insurers around the country."

The lab said in January that its advertised cash price for a COVID-19 rapid antigen test was $179, the report said.

GS Labs has locations in nine states, including eight facilities in Minnesota.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/lab/blue-cross-and-blue-shield-minnesota-files-lawsuit-against-covid-19-lab-for-price-inflation-fraudulent-billing.html

Bluebird Bio Says Cash Crunch Raises ‘Going Concern’ Risk

 Bluebird Bio Inc. said it faces doubt about its ability to continue operating without raising more money, in the latest signal of a cash squeeze that is grounding some former high-fliers in the biotechnology sector.

https://infinityweb.co.in/bluebird-bio-says-cash-crunch-raises-going-concern-risk