Search This Blog

Friday, April 8, 2022

Alzheimer's drugmakers seek accelerated FDA review despite U.S. coverage decision

 Eisai Co Ltd and Eli Lilly and Co on Friday said they still plan to seek accelerated U.S. approval for experimental Alzheimer's drugs even after the Medicare health plan decided to severely limit coverage of medicines approved in that manner.

On Thursday, after a months-long review and a pressure campaign from patient advocacy groups, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) said it would only pay for Biogen Inc's Aduhelm, and other drugs that work in a similar fashion, for patients enrolled in valid clinical studies, unless the treatments demonstrate clear evidence of patient benefit.

Medicare covers nearly 64 million Americans age 65 and older, so the coverage decision could affect 85% of people who might otherwise use the medications for the age-related condition.

Eisai's lecanemab and Lilly's donanemab, like Aduhelm, are monoclonal antibodies designed to remove beta-amyloid, a type of protein fragment that accumulates in the brains of Alzheimer's patients. The two drugmakers said they expect upcoming Phase III trial results to eventually validate earlier-stage data under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

A fourth plaque-targeting antibody, gantenerumab, is in late-stage development at Roche Holding AG, which is not seeking an accelerated FDA review.

The FDA in June authorized Biogen's Aduhelm - the first drug in this class and first U.S. approved Alzheimer's treatment in 20 years - under the agency's accelerated pathway based on the drug's plaque-clearing ability, rather than proof it slows cognitive decline in Alzheimer's patients.

Medicare, however, has decided to allow standard reimbursement only for Alzheimer's drugs approved under the traditional FDA process based on "a direct measure of clinical benefit."

Eisai, which is partnered with Biogen, said it aims to complete a rolling FDA application for lecanemab, under the accelerated pathway, by mid-year. The Japanese drugmaker said it also expects results from its 1,800-patient, Phase III trial this fall.

If those results are positive, Eisai said it believes the large study could meet the "high level of evidence" criteria set by Medicare in its coverage decision.

The study is designed to show that lecanemab can slow by at least 25% the rate of cognitive and functional decline.

"It is a disease-modifying drug," Ivan Cheung, Eisai's U.S. chairman, said in a recent interview with Reuters. "You expect to see separation between the treated and untreated groups that improves over time."

Roche also expects to report Phase III trial results for gantenerumab later this year.

Lilly, in a statement, said it intends to complete its current, rolling application for accelerated FDA approval of donanemab this year. It does not expect to have results from a Phase III trial of the drug until mid-2023.

The Indianapolis-based company said it believes Medicare coverage restrictions are "unnecessary, restrictive and inappropriate" for FDA-approved drugs.

The idea that removing amyloid plaques is reasonably likely to slow cognitive and functional decline in people living with early Alzheimer’s is known as the "amyloid hypothesis," a theory that has led to long history of drugs that tried and failed to clear the plagues or help patients.

Greg Rippon, neuroscience and Alzheimer's Disease medical lead at Roche's Genentech unit, explained in a recent interview that the theory is supported by analysis of inherited forms of Alzheimer's, which are all caused by mutations in amyloid processing.

He said more recent studies have shown that the build-up of amyloid is a precursor to other brain dysfunction that speeds neurodegeneration for patients with Alzheimer's.

"Obviously, it comes down to clinical data and demonstrating that clinical benefit and that's where a lot of skepticism is centered," Rippon said. 

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/EISAI-CO-LTD-6492461/news/Alzheimer-s-drugmakers-seek-accelerated-FDA-review-despite-U-S-coverage-decision-40006292/

Genocea Dives After Early Data From GEN-011 Trial In Pretreated Solid Tumor

Genocea Biosciences Inc (NASDAQ: GNCA) has shared initial data from Phase 1/2a TiTAN trial OF GEN-011 in patients with refractory solid tumors.

  • The company says that the early results presented at American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) show anti-tumor activity despite the lower intensity regimens and heavily pretreated tumors.

  • Stable disease was seen at the initial Day 57 scan in four of the five patients. While all patients had progressive disease (PD) at their Day 113 scan, three of the five experienced clear biologic changes after infusion.

  • A patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experienced a 10% reduction in tumor diameters (approx. 30% reduction in volume) and resolution of tumor-associated cough.

  • None of the initial patients have experienced dose-limiting toxicities, with no self-reactivity or autoimmune toxicity evidence.

  • Overall, the range of Grade 2 and Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) align with expected toxicity from cell therapy regimens.

  • Additional data presented at AACR highlights ongoing work characterizing inhibitory antigens or Inhibigens.

  • A preclinical poster presented at the meeting demonstrates how detrimental these Inhibigens are to the efficacy of cancer therapeutics in mouse models of melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

 

How Should Medicare Part B Drug Payments Be Changed? MedPAC Members Mull Options

 How should Medicare change the way it pays for drugs under the Part B program? Members of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) considered several answers to that question at MedPAC's April meeting.

At Thursday morning's session, MedPAC staff members presented three different options for regulating the price of Part B drugs, which are administered by physicians in their offices. Currently, Medicare pays physician practices the average sales price (ASP) for most Part B drugs, plus a 6% administrative fee. However, as MedPAC principal policy analyst Nancy Ray pointed out in her presentation, this reimbursement method may give doctors an incentive to prescribe higher-priced drugs, since their administrative reimbursement will be higher.

In addition, Medicare Part B drug spending grew nearly 10% annually from 2009 to 2019, reaching $40.7 billion in 2020, with higher prices accounting for most of the spending increase, Ray said. Drug spending in Part B is also highly concentrated, with 20 products accounting for 52% of spending.

Because regulations appear to require Medicare to pay on a fee-for-service basis for any Part B drug used for an FDA-labeled indication, "Medicare has few tools to address a product's coverage or payment," Ray explained. In addition, manufacturers are free to set whatever price they like for their drugs, "and Medicare's payment policies generally do not consider whether a new product results in better outcomes than its alternatives," she added.

Ray and fellow principal policy analyst Kim Neuman presented three options for commissioners to consider:

For new "first-in-class" drugs with high launch prices and limited evidence of effectiveness, Medicare could require coverage with evidence development (CED) -- that is, only cover the drug if the patient is enrolled in a clinical trial, as it recently did with the newly approved Alzheimer's disease treatment aducanumab (Aduhelm) -- and set a payment cap based on an analysis of the drug's cost-effectiveness. "Pairing cost-effectiveness analysis with CED reflects the uncertainty" about how well these new drugs are going to work, Ray said.

For drugs that already have therapeutic alternatives, Medicare could implement "reference pricing," which is paying for a drug by taking its competitors' prices into account, she continued. This could be done in one of several ways: setting the reference price based on the lowest-cost product in the group; setting the price based on the volume-weighted ASP of all the products in the group; or using the minimum volume-weighted ASP of all the products in the group.

"It will also be important to address whether Medigap would cover cost-sharing that is greater than the reference price," said Ray. And any payment choices that affect patient access to particular drugs, or drug payment rates, "may result in patient, clinician, or manufacturer dissatisfaction," she added.

To address concerns about the ASP-plus-6% reimbursement formula, Neuman presented three possible alternatives: capping the administrative payment at 6% or $175, whichever is lower (option 1); capping the administrative fee at 3% + $21 (option 2); or paying 6%, 3% + $21, or $175, whichever is lowest (option 3). Option 1 would have the greatest effect on the highest-priced products; option 2 would mostly affect lower- and mid-priced products; and option 3 would mostly affect mid- and higher-priced products, she said.

The analysts simulated what effects each of the three options for changing the ASP-plus-6% formula would have on Medicare Part B drug spending, using 2019 data and assuming no changes in utilization. They found that option 1 would result in aggregate savings of 1.9%, option 2 would result in no savings, and option 3 would result in savings of 2.6%.

Neuman noted that in years past, "stakeholders have raised concerns about small practice owners' ability to acquire drugs if the add-on is changed. Data on providers' acquisition costs for drugs are limited and it is unknown whether prices vary across purchasers for expensive drugs." However, she added, "it is in manufacturers' interest to ensure that providers are able to acquire drugs at a price in line with the Medicare payment amount. And ... there is evidence of manufacturers changing pricing patterns in response to past policies."

Commission member Stacie Dusetzina, PhD, of the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee, said that she is "incredibly supportive of the idea of doing some sort of price negotiation" for first-in-class drugs with limited evidence of effectiveness. "I don't think we need to tie that to coverage with evidence development," she said. "I think we should leave it on the table that those drugs are by definition being approved with uncertain evidence, and that we should have the opportunity to negotiate in those cases."

Commissioner Lynn Barr, MPH, of Caravan Health in Kansas City, Missouri, said that as for changing the ASP-plus-6% formula, "I want to really get a better understanding of what it is we're paying for with the 6% so that we don't cause harm to people ... I'm definitely in favor of the flat [administrative] fee as opposed to a sliding scale" using a percentage, because "I don't think [the percentage] was created in a time when we had the kind of drug prices we have today, and it seems very inappropriate."

Commission vice-chair Paul Ginsburg, PhD, of the Brookings Institution here, said he preferred option 1 or option 3 for fixing the ASP-plus-6% formula. Ginsburg pooh-poohed the notion that small physician practices might lose money if the 6% fee were decreased. "The expensive drugs are drugs where the manufacturing cost tends to be a very small percentage of the price," he said. "It just seems to be a no-brainer that if some physicians cannot afford to administer the drugs, the prices [will] come down ... They will adjust to prevent a situation where physicians cannot have the full panoply of options to treat a disease."

https://www.medpagetoday.com/practicemanagement/reimbursement/98135

Nurix: New Preclinical Data Supporting NX-2127 and DeTIL-0255 Clinical Programs at AACR

 Studies provide insight into bifunctional molecular mechanism and first in vivo demonstration of immunomodulatory imide drug (IMiD) activity of NX-2127, resulting in robust tumor cell killing

Animal models of adoptive cell therapy support the use of NX-0255 in the production of an investigational drug-enhanced TIL therapy, DeTIL-0255

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nurix-therapeutics-presents-preclinical-data-170200069.html

Moderna recalls thousands of COVID vaccine doses in Europe

 Moderna Inc said on Friday it was recalling 764,900 doses of its COVID-19 vaccine made by its contract manufacturer Rovi after a vial was found contaminated by a foreign body.

No safety issues have been identified, Moderna said about the lots that were distributed in Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden in January.

The drugmaker said the contamination was found in just one vial, and it was recalling the whole lot out of "an abundance of caution". It did not disclose what was found in the vial.

Japanese authorities last year suspended the use of some doses of the vaccine, which Moderna later recalled, after an investigation found stainless steel contaminants in some vials.

Over 900 million doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine have been administered worldwide to date.

Moderna said on Friday it did not believe the contamination posed a risk to other vials in the lot.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/1-moderna-recalls-thousands-covid-161413815.html

Zentalis: Positive Initial Data in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

 ZN-c3 in combination with chemotherapy demonstrated strong anti-tumor activity in a heavily pretreated population, with an ORR of 30.2% across all evaluable chemotherapy cohorts

ZN-c3 in combination with chemotherapy was well-tolerated, exhibiting a better hematologic and gastrointestinal tolerability profile within the Wee1 inhibitor class

Mini symposium on the ZN-c3 uterine serous carcinoma (USC) expansion cohort to be presented on April 11, 2022 at 2:50 p.m. CT

Updates on clinical and preclinical studies with ZN-c5 and ZN-d5

Company to host webcast event with key opinion leader, Kathleen Moore, MD, today, Friday, April 8 at 4:00 p.m. EDT

“Utilizing a continuous dosing regimen in patients with advanced disease, ZN-c3 demonstrated an Objective Response Rate of 30.2% across all cohorts – achieving up to 62.5% with one cohort – and a markedly better tolerability profile within the Wee1 inhibitor class. Based on these promising initial results, we believe the data support the development of a Phase 3 trial to further investigate this combination’s effect in ovarian cancer patients. We look forward to announcing our future development plans for this program before year-end and are motivated by the opportunity to potentially deliver an improved and best-in-class treatment option to patients.”


Summary of Clinical Activity

Cohort

N

Evaluable* (n)

PR/uPR+ (n)

SD/SD+ (n)

PD (n)

DCR (%)

ORR (%)

Total

56

43

13

24

6

86.0

30.2

ZN-c3 + PLD

30

24

3

17

4

83.3

12.5

ZN-c3 + carboplatin

17

11

5

4

2

81.8

45.5

ZN-c3 + paclitaxel

9

8

5

3

-

100

62.5


Webcast Event:

Zentalis will host a webcast event with key opinion leader, Kathleen Moore, MD, today, Friday, April 8, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. EDT. Dr. Moore is the Associate Professor in the Section of Gynecologic Oncology; the Jim and Christy Everest Endowed Chair in Cancer Research; and the Director of the Oklahoma TSET Phase I Program for the Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma College of Medicine. She has a clinical research interest in drug development and Phase I trials and is a leading expert in gynecological oncology.

To register and access the event, the webcast link is available on the Investors & Media section of the Zentalis website at www.zentalis.com.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/zentalis-pharmaceuticals-announces-positive-initial-170000516.html

AACR22: Rubius touts new data for lead program, but shares routed as investors flee

 Looking to build on its first cut of human data from last year, Rubius Therapeutics is touting new Phase I data from its lead cancer program in both solid tumors and acute myeloid leukemia. But the results proved sorely disappointing to investors after appearing to be less effective than the previous readout.

https://endpts.com/aacr22-rubius-touts-new-data-for-lead-program-but-will-it-prove-effective-enough-for-investors/