Search This Blog

Sunday, August 6, 2023

Aligos culls another hepatitis B asset, citing inconclusive efficacy data

 Strike another hepatitis B drug candidate from Aligos Therapeutics’ once-stacked pipeline. The biotech kept up the cadence of program pruning by deciding against committing more cash to an siRNA prospect after getting a look at early-phase data.

Aligos, which was once focused on developing a functional cure for hepatitis B, shifted its attention to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and COVID-19 in February. The biotech decided to continue phase 1 clinical trials of its two remaining hepatitis B candidates but prioritize investment in NASH and COVID-19 to get prospects past milestones. 

The earlier update indicated that ALG-125755, a siRNA that targets the production of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), was unlikely to have a future at Aligos. The biotech confirmed that indication in its update on the second quarter.

In the statement, Aligos said dosing in the first two parts of its ALG-125755 study is now complete, giving the biotech data on the use of single ascending subcutaneous doses of the siRNA candidate in healthy volunteers and virologically suppressed, hepatitis B e-antigen-negative subjects with chronic hepatitis B. 

The early-phase study found ALG-125755 was well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic results matched Aligos’ predictions, and the candidate lowered HBsAg levels across the dose range evaluated. However, with the comparative efficacy data versus rival siRNAs proving “inconclusive,” Aligos will only advance the asset if a partner comes on board. The biotech is saving its dwindling internal resources for other programs. 

Aligos continues to collect clinical data on its capsid-assembly modulator, ALG-000184, but that is now its only hepatitis B program in active development. The biotech dropped two drug candidates early last year in response to lackluster efficacy and a safety signal.

Retreating from hepatitis B will allow Aligos to pump its remaining $90.8 million into other indications. The biotech expects the money to keep the lights on until the end of next year, by which time it could have phase 1 data on its COVID-19 candidate and results from a phase 2 trial of its NASH prospect. Aligos is cutting it fine with the NASH program, with data due in the fourth quarter of 2024.

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/aligos-culls-another-hepatitis-b-asset-citing-inconclusive-efficacy-data

Voyager Therapeutics adds anti-amyloid gene therapy to Alzheimer's pipeline

 Voyager Therapeutics is tripling down on its Alzheimer’s disease franchise, this time with a gene therapy aimed at amyloid-beta plaques.

The company broke the news on its second-quarter earnings call with investors, during which CEO Alfred Sandrock, M.D., Ph.D., cited recent momentum behind anti-amyloid beta antibodies—like the regulatory approval of Eisai and Biogen’s Leqembi—as part of the impetus for the move. Voyager already has two programs in its pipeline targeting tau, the other key protein thought to drive Alzheimer’s etiology.

“I think of amyloid as the trigger, and tau as the bullet,” Sandrock said. “There’s a tipping point at which increasing amounts of amyloid cause tau to spread, and that spread of tau is what causes neurodegeneration.” The CEO pointed to Eli Lilly's data from a late-stage clinical trial of its anti-amyloid-beta antibody donanemab, which showed that it was more likely to be effective in patients who had lower levels of tau.

“Ultimately, we need to better understand the clinical efficacy of anti-amyloid treatments by stage and subtype,” he added. “Complete responders may not need more treatment than anti-amyloid, but partial responders may be appropriate for a combination of anti-amyloid and anti-tau, and nonresponders may be candidates for switching to anti-tau monotherapy.”

Voyager's new gene therapy is composed of an anti-amyloid beta antibody encoded in a viral vector and delivered in the company’s TRACER capsids. Voyager thinks the treatment could be superior to intravenously infused anti-amyloid antibodies because it may be less likely to cause amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, or ARIA, a group of dangerous neurological side effects characterized by abnormal MRI findings. Reports of ARIA have dogged anti-amyloid antibodies, including donanemab and Leqembi.

Both presence of the same APOE4 gene variant that predisposes people to Alzheimer's and the size of the initial dose have been linked to the development of ARIA. There is “biologic rationale” to suggest that gene therapy wouldn’t confer the same degree of risk, Voyager Chief Scientific Officer Todd Carter, Ph.D., said on the earnings call.

“In a gene therapy approach, the anti-amyloid antibodies are steadily secreted by cells in the central nervous system, and thus we’d be avoiding high antibody concentrations that necessarily follow intravenous antibody infusions,” he said. “Moreover, the antibody would first engage the beta amyloid deposited in and around beta amyloid plaques rather than around blood vessels, thus avoiding ARIA.”

Still, some risk does remain, Sandrock acknowledged on the call. The company is considering several mitigation strategies to handle ARIA if it does arise, including the use of a small molecule to control gene expression.

Voyager hasn’t yet disclosed which anti-amyloid antibody it’s vectorizing, instead telling an analyst on the call that the company has been exploring “several options.” 

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/research/voyager-therapeutics-adds-anti-amyloid-gene-therapy-alzheimers-pipeline

Cause of inner-ear bone loss

 Chronic inflammation of the middle ear can cause several problems and complications that can affect a person's hearing and balance. One such problem is the formation of a cholesteatoma, which is an abnormal collection of cells in the ear that can cause bone erosion if left untreated. In turn, this can cause symptoms such as hearing loss, dizziness, facial paralysis, and even a brain infection.

In a study published recently in Nature Communications, researchers from Osaka University have revealed the cause of cholesteatomas, which may help in developing new therapies for patients who are suffering from this disease.

Cholesteatomas are made up of cysts or bumps in the ear that consist of skin, collagen fibers, skin cells, fibroblasts, keratin, and dead tissue. There are many theories on how these cholesteatomas can cause bone erosion, including the activation of cells responsible for the breakdown of the minerals and matrix of the bone, the presence of inflammatory markers and enzymes, and the accumulation and pressure from dead cells and tissues in the ear; however, the exact mechanism for the creation of cholesteatomas remains unknown. "A cholesteatoma can still return or happen again even after its surgical removal, so it is important to know what is actually causing it," says lead author Kotaro Shimizu.

To investigate this, researchers looked at human cholesteatoma tissues that were surgically removed from patients. A process called single-cell RNA sequencing analysis was employed to identify cells responsible for triggering bone erosion; these were called osteoclastogenic fibroblasts. This study demonstrated how these fibroblasts expressed an abundant amount of activin A, a molecule that regulates different physiologic functions of the body. The presence of activin A is said to cause bone erosion through a process in which specialized cells initiate bone resorption through a process wherein the minerals and matrix of the bones are broken down and absorbed by the body.

The researchers were successful in showing the relationship between activin A and bone erosion in cholesteatoma. "Our study showed that targeting activin A is a potential treatment in the management of cholesteatomas," states senior author Masaru Ishii.

Currently in clinical settings, the only effective treatment for cholesteatomas is complete surgical removal. However, the discovery of how a cholesteatoma can cause bone erosion in this study offers new hope for developing novel medical treatments as first-line management for cholesteatomas.

Journal Reference:

  1. Kotaro Shimizu, Junichi Kikuta, Yumi Ohta, Yutaka Uchida, Yu Miyamoto, Akito Morimoto, Shinya Yari, Takashi Sato, Takefumi Kamakura, Kazuo Oshima, Ryusuke Imai, Yu-Chen Liu, Daisuke Okuzaki, Tetsuya Hara, Daisuke Motooka, Noriaki Emoto, Hidenori Inohara, Masaru Ishii. Single-cell transcriptomics of human cholesteatoma identifies an activin A-producing osteoclastogenic fibroblast subset inducing bone destructionNature Communications, 2023; 14 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40094-3

Opportunity and New Therapies Are Driving Interest in a Rare Cardiovascular Disease

 The global market for pulmonary arterial hypertension treatments is expected to reach nearly $11 billion by 2030. While not the $24 billion projected for the non-alcoholic steatohepatitis market by 2028 or the $30 billion the obesity market could see by 2030, PAH drugs are hot property.

In 2021, Merck paid $11.5 billion to acquire Acceleron Pharma and its pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) drug sotatercept. Bayer and Pfizer are also big players, as is United Therapeutics, which in 2018 paid Arena Pharmaceuticals a potential $1.2 billion for exclusive worldwide rights to develop late-stage PAH candidate ralinepag. So, when it comes to PAH, what’s the big draw for biopharma?

PAH is a rare disease, with between 500 and 1,000 people diagnosed each year in the U.S. A specific type of pulmonary hypertension, PAH occurs when tiny arteries in the lungs thicken and narrow, which makes the heart work harder to pump blood. This extra demand on the heart often leads to fatal heart failure within a few years.

The market may be modest compared with others, but there’s a significant gap waiting to be exploited, said Akash Patel, a healthcare analyst in cardiovascular and metabolic disorders at GlobalData Healthcare.  

“Significant opportunity remains to develop a therapy that addresses the underlying cause of disease and not one that just treats symptoms,” he told BioSpace. “Developing a therapy that addresses the disease pathogenesis and has a good safety profile has the potential to gain $2 billion-plus of market share in the long-term, and this would prove to be significant revenue for any pharma company that can dominate the space.”

Patients with PAH have decreased expression of the enzyme prostacyclin synthase, which leads to reduced prostacyclin in blood vessels in the lungs. In turn, these lower prostacyclin levels decrease levels of cAMP, which constricts blood vessels.

Many existing PAH drugs are PDE5 inhibitors, such as sildenafil, that increase cAMP levels and so promote dilation of blood vessels.

“This doesn’t address the disease mechanism that is causing the decrease in prostacyclin synthase,” Patel said. These therapies are often given in combination with a different class of drugs, prostacylin receptor agonists, that prevent vasoconstriction. These treatments do offer some important relief from PAH symptoms such as shortness of breath, but they do not treat the disease itself, which continues to progress, he added. “The market opportunity for addressing PAH remains significant, especially for a therapy that is disease-modifying.”

A New Wave of Therapies

Sotatercept is a potential game-changer, Patel said, because rather than seeking to promote vasodilation, it can tackle a root cause of PAH—the cell proliferation that drives the problematic arterial thickening. Analysts say the drug could reach sales of $1.4 billion by 2028.

According to Joerg Koglin, vice president for global clinical development at Merck Cardiovascular, this anti-proliferation approach means sotatercept can effectively reverse the disease. In preclinical studies with mice, these vessels essentially looked like normal vessels, Koglin told BioSpace. “I personally have never seen something like that,” he said.

Top-line data from the drug’s Phase III trial, reported in Oct. 2022, have added to the excitement.

PAH trials focus on improvements in how far patients on a treatment can walk in six minutes. But in addition to showing significant benefits there, sotatercept also appeared to slow the progression of clinical symptoms.

“This was the first study where patients didn't only slow down their progression, but where actually a substantial proportion of patients improved their progression,” Koglin said. The company is now running a trial to see if the drug can reduce deaths and hospitalization. “That’s never been shown with any PAH drug.”

Such anti-proliferation therapies are driving a “new wave” of PAH treatments, said Tim Noyes, CEO of Aerovate Therapeutics, which is developing an inhaled version of the cancer drug imatinib as an anti-proliferation therapy for PAH.

“A lot of the interest now in PAH is studying novel anti-proliferative mechanisms like ours,” Noyes told BioSpace. “We have lots of drugs that dilate blood vessels, [but] you can only dilate them so much. They’re still going to gunk up and narrow from the inside out.”

Anti-proliferation drugs tend to have more-severe side effects than vasodilators, which has stifled progress. But companies are now finding ways to better target the effects. And because they work against different cellular pathways, combinations of anti-proliferation drugs could be used together to maximize the benefits, Noyes said.

“Like cancer, this is a disease that almost certainly, for my lifetime and yours, will be treated with combinations,” he said. “If we can reverse it, certainly arrest it, then we’ve changed the nature of this disease. And hopefully, one day, like HIV, this becomes a chronic disease that people manage with their drugs.”

A Broader Opportunity

There’s a further “elephant in the room” when it comes to work on PAH, Koglin said, and one that can also help to explain the commercial interest in such a rare disease.

While PAH is rare, other forms of pulmonary hypertension are not. Pulmonary hypertension can result from heart failure, which affects more than 64 million people worldwide. And pulmonary hypertension is associated with pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which affects more than 10% of people over 40.

In principle, finding ways to use anti-proliferation drugs to control blood vessel vasoconstriction in PAH could open the door to similar benefits in these more common—and so more lucrative—related diseases.

“If you could develop a drug that improves pulmonary hypertension secondary to heart failure, you open up a completely new space,” Koglin said. “We have good preclinical data that shows it should work there.”

https://www.biospace.com/article/opportunity-and-new-therapies-are-driving-interest-in-rare-cardiovascular-disease/

2023 shaping up to be biggest year for biopharma M&A since pandemic

2023 is shaping up to be the biggest year for biopharma M&A since the pandemic, despite increased FTC scrutiny and rising capital costs.

Biden Admin Reduces Savings Estimate For Switch Away From Gas Stoves: Industry Group

 by Naveen Athrapully via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is receiving criticism for its updated data analysis regarding the agency’s proposed regulations on gas stoves, which now projects even lower savings for consumers than the already meager numbers.

The new data shows that “savings are even less than DOE originally projected and are almost negligible,” the industry group Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) said about the changes in an Aug. 3 press release. “DOE’s original proposal was to save consumers 13 cents per month in utility costs over the life of gas cooking products. The revised data reduces consumer savings to just 9 cents per month,” it pointed out.

The changes in energy savings projected by DOE primarily result from DOE recognizing that the currently available cooking products are more efficient than its earlier analysis assumed.”

At 9 cents a month, the projected savings will come to just $1.08 per year. Over a decade, that amounts to $10.80 in savings.

The department proposed new energy efficiency standards for gas stoves back in February. In a March 14 opinion piece at Washington Examiner, Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) warned that stringent energy performance standards would mean that 96 percent of conventional gas stoves could potentially be eliminated from the market.

“In fact, it is essentially an outright ban on gas stoves,” she said.

Ms. Lesko also highlighted the meager savings resulting from the new standards, arguing that people will not be willing to trade “such substantially decreased functionality and features for minuscule savings.”

In its comments submitted to the energy department, AHAM pointed out that many consumer features on gas stoves, like simmer burners and high-input rate burners, must be protected if the department was to implement its energy efficiency proposal.

However, the DOE has “still has not made any changes” to the proposed standards, it said, according to the release.

“This means consumers could still lose access to features and many currently available gas cooking appliance models—in exchange for saving only pennies each month.”

Countering Through Legislation

In order to counter the Biden admin’s push to restrict gas stoves, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the “Save Our Gas Stoves” Act in the Senate in June

The Act explicitly prohibits the DOE from implementing the energy efficiency standards for gas stoves proposed in February or any similar rule.

“This bill places limits on energy conservation standards for kitchen ranges or ovens under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The Department of Energy (DOE) may not prescribe or amend energy conservation standards for kitchen ranges or ovens if they would result in the unavailability of a product on account of the type of fuel the range or oven uses,” according to the bill summary.

The legislation was introduced in the Senate by Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In the House, Rep. Lesko introduced the companion legislation. It passed the House by a vote of 249-181.

“The federal government has no business telling Americans how to cook their dinner,” said Mr. Manchin, according to a June 14 press release.

“I am proud to support this legislation that would help ensure this Administration doesn’t eliminate consumer choice and make life even more expensive for the hard-working men and women of this country.

AHAM has backed the Save Our Gas Stoves Act. “Americans, 40 percent of whom live in homes that cook with gas, do not want to give up multiple large burners or spend a full day per year just waiting for water to boil, both of which would be a reality for gas cooking appliances if the DOE’s proposal were to take effect,” it said in a June 14 press release.

“The DOE’s proposal is a major setback for innovation and offers only negligible energy savings in return.”

The Epoch Times has reached out to the DOE for comment.

Expensive Transition

During a July 18 hearing of the Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs, several Republicans argued that DOE proposed rules on gas stove efficiency standards would be burdensome and costly for American citizens, especially low-income groups.

In a May 24 testimony (pdf) to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, Matthew J. Agen from the American Gas Association (AGA) highlighted the cost efficiency of gas to everyday Americans.

Households that use natural gas for heating, cooking, and clothes drying save an average of $1,068 per year compared to homes using electricity for those applications. In fact, the low cost of natural gas has saved families a total of $147 billion over 10 years.”

Gas stoves aren’t the only fossil-fuel-powered appliance that the Biden administration is targeting. In June, the DOE proposed regulations on gas-powered home furnaces to make them more energy efficient, a decision that could potentially limit consumer choice.

In July, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) proposed a policy that would remove almost all existing portable gas generators from the market.

The new rule restricts the amount of carbon monoxide that generators can emit by forcing these generators to switch off when they reach a certain level of emissions.

Smaller gas generators would have to cut carbon monoxide emissions by 50 percent, and larger generators would have to cut emissions by up to 95 percent. Nearly all models currently available are expected to not be in compliance with the new standard.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/biden-admin-reduces-savings-estimate-americans-switching-away-gas-stoves-industry-group

Developed Nations With Packed Infant Vax Schedule Tied To Higher Child Mortality Rates: Study

  by Megan Redshaw via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Highly developed nations requiring the most neonatal vaccine doses tend to have the worst mortality rates in children under age 5, according to a peer-reviewed study published July 20 in Cureus.

Researchers Neil Miller, director of the Institute of Medical and Scientific Inquiry in New Mexico, and Gary Goldman, who has a doctorate in computer science, performed several analyses based on 2019 and 2021 data to explore potential relationships between the number of early childhood vaccinations required by developed nations and their neonatal, infant, and under age 5 mortality rates.

According to global health experts, few measures in public health can compare with the impact of vaccines, which are credited with having reduced disease, disability, and death from a variety of infectious diseases. Yet the study found that developed nations requiring more neonatal vaccinations may have unintended consequences that increase childhood mortality, challenging the idea that more vaccines administered always results in fewer deaths.

“Our paper investigated potential associations between the number of early childhood vaccine doses that developed nations require and their early childhood mortality rates,” Mr. Miller told The Epoch Times in an email. “For example, some nations administer hepatitis B and tuberculosis (BCG) vaccines to their infants shortly after birth. We found that nations that require both vaccines had significantly worse infant mortality rates when compared to nations that require neither vaccine.”

Miller and Goldman’s research initially began in 2011 when they published a paper using 2009 data showing less favorable infant mortality rates among highly developed nations requiring the most infant vaccinations.

The recent study replicated their original study using 2019 and 2021 data from the top 50 nations where childhood vaccine doses range from 12 to 26.  Results showed the infant mortality rate increased by 0.167 deaths per 1,000 live births for each additional vaccine dose added to the vaccination schedule, supporting the earlier study’s findings.

Twenty-nine nations in 2009 had better infant mortality rates than the United States, but by 2019, the United States had declined to 44th in infant mortality rankings, and in 2021, ranked 50th—despite requiring the highest number of infant vaccines.

Hepatitis B and Tuberculosis Vaccination May Increase Mortality

In their latest study, Miller and Goldman broadened their research to assess the impact of hepatitis and tuberculosis vaccines on mortality rates of neonatal infants (babies under 28 days old), infants up to age 1, and children under 5. Mortality data and vaccination schedules were compiled from UNICEF, the World Health Organization, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and national governments.

Nations were then grouped based on whether they required zero, one, or two vaccine doses given to newborns to determine their statistical significance to mortality rates of the three age groups. The association demonstrated by the analysis showed neonatal vaccines for hepatitis B and tuberculosis may not contribute to an overall reduction in mortality in nations where infants are at low risk of mortality from diseases the vaccines are targeting. In these nations, infants may actually experience greater risks from vaccination.

Reduction in Infant Vaccine Doses Decreased Mortality

Using 2021 data, the researchers found a statistically significant difference of 1.28 deaths per 1000 live births between the mean infant mortality rates among nations that did not vaccinate their neonates at all and those that required two vaccine doses. For each reduction of six vaccine doses administered during infancy, the infant mortality rate improved by approximately one death per 1,000 live births.

Additionally, vaccines administered during the first year of life had a greater effect on under age 5 mortality rates compared with vaccines administered in the second through fifth years of life, suggesting younger infants who generally weigh less and receive more vaccines in a shorter period are significantly more likely to experience an adverse reaction resulting in hospitalization or death.

“Hepatitis B and tuberculosis vaccines given shortly after birth when the immune system is immature and the neonate has low weight, may increase vulnerability to serious adverse reactions and deaths that ultimately contribute to higher neonatal, infant, and under age five mortality rates,” Mr. Miller told The Epoch Times.

Vaccination Sequence and Combination Can Impact Mortality

In most nations, more than half of infant deaths occur during the neonatal period, with about 75 percent of neonatal deaths occurring during the first week of life when neonatal vaccines are administered, according to Mr. Miller. Deaths that occur during this period have a large impact on neonatal, infant, and under age 5 mortality rates.

The study states the U.S. neonatal mortality rate comprises 61 percent of its infant mortality rate and 52 percent of the mortality rate in children under age 5.

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/developed-nations-packed-infant-vax-schedule-linked-higher-childhood-mortality-rates-study