Search This Blog

Saturday, January 6, 2024

Initial US employment reports overstated by 439,000 jobs in 2023

 There’s something wrong with previous U.S. jobs reports.

The government quietly erased 439,000 jobs through November 2023, a closer look at the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows. 

That means its initial jobs results were inflated by 439,000 positions, and the job market is not as healthy as the government suggests. 

Since the government wiped out 439,000 jobs after the fact, the total percentage of jobs created by the government last year is even higher. 

Increased government hiring has been driving the jobs numbers higher.

This matters because U.S. jobs reports move the markets and U.S. Treasury yields.

Plus, they are a significant factor in the Federal Reserve’s decisions about the path of interest rate hikes and cuts. All that affects U.S. consumers’ pocketbooks. 

“Time to stop trading off the payroll data,” tweeted David Rosenberg, founder of Rosenberg Research Associates.

By his calculations, he says the downward revisions came to “an epic 443,000,” adding, “more than 40% of payroll growth in 2023” came from “the fairy tale ‘Birth-Death’ model” the BLS uses to “guesstimate” its jobs reports.

The government quietly erased 439,000 jobs through November 2023, a closer look at the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows.Scharfsinn86

Again, the government sector in December ranked high in job creation.

It created 52,000 jobs in the final month of 2023.

As FOX Business’s Edward Lawrence points out, that brings the three-month average of jobs created by the government sector to 50,000 per month.

Lawrence says Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su “would not answer if this is sustainable when I pressed her.”

The health care and social assistance sector, which relies heavily on money from government spending, created about 59,000 jobs.

That means its initial jobs results were inflated by 439,000 positions, and the job market is not as healthy as the government suggests.AFP via Getty Images

The problem of overstated jobs numbers is not a new one.

In August 2023, the BLS issued a preliminary revision for the 12 months through March 2023 showing U.S. job growth for that period was overstated by a net 306,000 jobs.

That’s 25,500 fewer jobs on average per month in that period. 

Private sector job creation also was adjusted lower by 358,000 in that period, while government payrolls were revised by an increase of 52,000.

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank in December 2022 also raised eyebrows when its algorithms predicted the BLS had overreported jobs growth by 1.1 million in the second quarter of that year.

Since the government wiped out 439,000 jobs after the fact, the total percentage of jobs created by the government last year is even higher.Halfpoint

The president, too, has been accused of taking too much credit for the job numbers.

He claimed he created 13 million to 14 million jobs.

But economists and market analysts have pointed out those were jobs the U.S. economy clawed back after pandemic shutdowns erased 22 million jobs. 

In reality, the economy under President Biden “added back” all the jobs lost in the pandemic and has “created” 4.86 million jobs since February 2020.

That’s a ho-hum result.

Plus, the economy “added back” all the manufacturing jobs lost in the pandemic and “created” 201,000 manufacturing jobs.

Just 6,000 were created in December 2023.

Manufacturing jobs are highly important.

They create a halo effect for other sectors, be it in the service industry or health care.

The manufacturing sector has been in contraction for 14 straight months.

Today, U.S. labor force participation is at a historically low 62.5%. 

As Edward Lawrence reports, the December jobs report shows 683,000 workers dropped out of the labor force.

A record high 8.69 million people now hold multiple jobs to make ends meet.

The economy lost 1.5 million full-time workers since June of last year, while adding 796,000 part-time workers.

That means more workers are holding down multiple jobs to pay for a higher cost of living due to a cumulative 17.4% inflation rate under this White House.

That’s not a good sign.

https://nypost.com/2024/01/06/business/initial-us-employment-reports-overstated-by-439000-jobs-in-2023/

Soaring sugar costs mean dessert prices may surge up to 6% in 2024

 Your milk and cookies just got a little bit more expensive.

The price of sugar and sweets could rise 5.6% in 2024 after an extreme drought in Thailand and India caused another bad crop year.

This comes as US consumers already saw sweets prices rise 8.9%, which is well above historical averages, according to the Department of Agriculture.

The global cost of sugar is at its highest since 2011 as India experience a dry spell and Thailand languished under a heavy drought.

Six out of the 10 top producing sugar countries experienced extreme weather in 2023.

Thailand saw its normal product cut nearly 25% due to it.

India and Thailand are the world’s biggest exporters of sugar.

Sugar production is only expected to get worst as global temperatures continue to rise, fueling both severe droughts and extreme weather, which hurt crop production.

The price of sugar and sweets could rise 5.6% in 2024 after Thailand and India had bad crop years due to a extreme drought.SlayStorm
This comes as US consumers already saw sweets prices rise 8.9%, which is well above historical averages.Ekaterina79

Major chocolate brand Mondelēz, which produces favorites Cadbury, Oreos and Toblerone, warned of a potential price hike in November.

CEO Dirk Van de Put told Bloomberg at the time that there would a “straightforward price increase” on some products due to the rising cost of sugar and cocoa.

He also said making products smaller “won’t solve this inflation at this stage.”

“While the rest of our input cost is largely flat for next year, those two are really causing us to have to increase prices again,” Van de Put said.

Six out of the 10 top producing sugar countries experienced extreme weather in 2023.DanielBendjy
Chocolate prices increased roughly 12% in 2023 – double what other groceries rose on average.WILLSIE

The price hikes were already visible to consumers around Halloween, when candy surged 13%.

Chocolate prices increased roughly 12% in 2023 – double what other groceries rose on average, thanks to rising demand in Asia and the spike in butter prices, used to make cocoa butter.

https://nypost.com/2024/01/06/lifestyle/soaring-sugar-costs-mean-dessert-prices-may-rise-6-in-2024/

Social media mocks Biden being led offstage by first lady after Jan. 6 remarks

 Users of X, formerly Twitter, mocked President Biden after seeing a clip of first lady Jill Biden leading him offstage after his January 6 anniversary remarks.

Multiple users expressed amusement that the White House staff appeared to be allowing Biden’s wife to rush up and lead the president away from the podium before he could make any awkward hesitations or walk to the wrong end of the stage in confusion.

RNC Research’s X account shared footage from the end of Biden’s speech near Valley Forge in Pennsylvania on Friday, during which he once again blasted former President Trump and his supporters as a threat to democracy.

The clip depicted the first lady going up on the stage as soon as Biden’s speech ended, grabbing his hand and leading him to the back of the stage where they both disappeared behind the American flags that were on display.

The account captioned it, saying: “Jill, Ed.D., escorts Biden off the stage following his remarks.”

RNC Research’s Jake Schneider observed: “She’s walking him off the stage like a child.”

HotAir.com associate editor Karen Townsend wrote: “Someone had to do it.” 

The official TownHall.com account expressed relief at the sight, stating: “Thank goodness that Jill Biden is there to lead Joe off stage.”

And while sharing its report on the scene, The Daily Mail US account added: “Jill Biden rushed to embrace zoned-out Biden after he finished speech, then went into trance-like state on-stage.”

Joe Biden and Jill Biden exit the stage
Jill Biden led Joe Biden off the stage on Friday night.AFP via Getty Images
Jill Biden leads Joe Biden off the stage
Social media mocked the President for having his wife lead him off the stage.AFP via Getty Images

Reporter Simon Ateba wrote on X: “BREAKING – NEW ARRANGEMENT: First Lady @DrBiden now escorts President @JoeBiden off the stage after his remarks in PA. President Biden has been struggling to find his way off the stage during previous remarks. The problem has now been solved. WATCH.”

Biden was also accused of looking confused later that day after landing in Delaware to spend the weekend with his family. RNC Research shared a clip of the incident with Biden appearing to look around perplexed for several moments after leaving his presidential helicopter. 

The account captioned the clip: “After two weeks of vacation and a 32-minute speech, Biden is back in Delaware for a weekend respite. He was VERY confused upon landing.”

https://nypost.com/2024/01/06/news/social-media-mocks-biden-being-led-offstage-by-first-lady/

South Korea Watchdog Intensifies Crackdown on China-Linked Notes

 

  • Regulators to start an investigation into 12 banks and brokers
  • Authorities unsure if investors understood the product: FSS

South Korea’s regulator will launch a wider probe into local banks and brokers which sold exotic notes linked to Chinese stocks amid concerns that the securities may saddle investors with heavy losses.

Authorities will start investigating 12 institutions on Monday to determine if there was any wrongdoing over the sale of equity-linked securities that are tied to the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, according to a statement from the Financial Supervisory Service. KB Kookmin Bank and Korea Investment & Securities Co. are among the firms that will be probed, it added.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-07/south-korea-watchdog-intensifies-crackdown-on-china-linked-notes

Fed's Logan: should not rule out another rate hike

 Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Lorie Logan on Saturday warned that the U.S. central bank may need to resume raising its short-term policy rate to keep a recent decline in long-term bond yields from rekindling inflation.

"If we don’t maintain sufficiently tight financial conditions, there is a risk that inflation will pick back up and reverse the progress we’ve made," Logan said in remarks prepared for delivery at an American Economic Association conference in San Antonio, Texas. "In light of the easing in financial conditions in recent months, we shouldn’t take the possibility of another rate increase off the table just yet."

The Fed raised its benchmark policy rate agressively in 2022 and the first part of 2023 to bring down what had been 40-year-high inflation, but since last July has kept it steady in the 5.25%-5.5% range.

Policymakers last month signaled they had seen enough progress on inflation to likely be done with rate hikes and to turn to interest-rate cuts this year. Financial markets responded by betting big on steep rate reductions this year.

Logan's view marks a pushback on those bets.

With the effects of the Fed's past rate hikes mostly behind us, Logan said, the decline in the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note -- from around 5% in mid-October to around 4% now -- could set the stage for a pickup in demand that could undo progress on inflation.

"Restrictive financial conditions have played an important role in bringing demand into line with supply and keeping inflation expectations well-anchored," she said, noting that inflation has come down closer to the Fed's 2% target and the labor market, while still tight, is rebalancing. "We can’t count on sustaining price stability if we don’t maintain sufficiently restrictive financial conditions."

Her remarks are notable particularly because she was among the first of Fed policymakers, last October, to suggest that the rise in long-term bond yields was doing some of the Fed's work for it, and meant the Fed could leave the policy rate where it was.

Logan also signaled she feels it is time to start thinking about slowing the process of shrinking the Fed's balance sheet.

"I think it’s appropriate to consider the parameters that will guide a decision to slow the runoff of our assets," she said. "In my view, we should slow the pace of runoff" as overnight reverse repurchase agreement balances approach a low level.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/feds-logan-not-rule-another-161758121.html

Court cancels Warren Buffett, Jimmy Haslam trial over Pilot

 An unusual, billion-dollar trial between Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway and the billionaire Haslam family was canceled by the court on Saturday, two days before it was scheduled to start.

"This confirms that the trial scheduled in this matter for January 8 and 9, 2024 is hereby canceled and has been removed from the Court's calendar," said a Saturday docket entry for the case. The entry said it was authorized by Vice Chancellor Morgan Zurn, the judge.

The Haslam family, Berkshire Hathaway and the chambers for Zurn could not be reached for comment.

The two-day non-jury trial in Delaware's Court of Chancery was meant to determine the value of the Haslam family's 20% stake in Pilot Travel Centers, the largest U.S. truck stop chain.

It was expected to feature testimony from Buffett's designated successor, Greg Abel.

The Haslams, including Cleveland Browns football team owner Jimmy Haslam, sold Berkshire 80% of Pilot for $11 billion in two separate deals, in 2017 and January 2023.

They also have a put option, allowing them to sell the remaining 20% in the first two months of any year.

Pilot, which also operates under the Flying J brand, has about 650 locations and sold 13 billion gallons of fuel in 2022.

Each side has accused the other of accounting tricks to manipulate the Knoxville, Tennessee-based company's earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT, which determines the value of the Haslam's 20% stake.

According to the Haslams, after Berkshire obtained the 80% Pilot stake it adopted "pushdown accounting" that would reduce how much it would owe if the put option were exercised.

A lawyer for Berkshire said in court that depending on which side's accounting was used, EBIT would differ by $1.2 billion.

The trial outcome would have turned on a simple question: was Berkshire required to get the Haslams' consent for the accounting change?

Berkshire said it did nothing wrong.

It said it has met its contractual obligations because adopting pushdown accounting did not amount to a change in "accounting policy."

The trial comes less than two months after the death of Charlie Munger, a Berkshire vice chairman and Buffett's long-term confidante, left a void that increased Abel's responsibilities at the Omaha, Nebraska, conglomerate.

Abel, 61, who is also a vice chairman and maintains a low public profile, was publicly identified in 2021 as Buffett's eventual successor as chief executive.

He was on lists of potential witnesses to be called by both Berkshire and the Haslams.

Buffett, 93, was not expected to testify at the trial.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/court-cancels-warren-buffett-jimmy-015601630.html