Search This Blog

Saturday, August 3, 2024

Beijing Copter Takeoff: China Central Banker Calls For Direct Money Transfers To Households

 When the US economy crashed in a deflationary vortex during the global financial crisis (and just after the time giant yen carry trade imploded), it seemed to many that another great Depression was assured. However, after a brief period of pain, both the US and the world economy staged a remarkable rebound which, we learned after the fact, was thanks to a unprecedented releveraging undertaken by China, which issued trillions in new debt and used the proceeds to not only build countless ghost cities, but to spark an inflationary tsunami around the world which helped the world economy recover from its depression on very short notice.

Fast forward 17 years when, with another massive yen carry trade collapsing, the world on the verge of a deflationary tsunami, central banks are either cutting rates or preparing to do so, and global growth starting at another recession (if not depression) in the face. "Deja "vu some would say (it would have been even more symmetric if the bank failures from last March been delayed until now) , but there is one major difference: unlike 2008, this time China is not coming to save the world. The reason why is the same reason why China's economy and markets have been in a downward spiral for the past 5 years: the world's second largest economy (soon to be overtaken by India's economy just as it recently lost the crown for most populous nation) simply has too much debt, and unlike 2008, Beijing has no more capacity to taken on the unlimited debt need to bootstrap the global economy (as discussed last year in "China's 300% Debt And Dilemmas").

Or maybe we - and consensus - are dead wrong: maybe despite pessimism that China simply has too much debt to do stimulate with even more new debt, this time Beijing will do what the Fed did in 2009 and launch helicopter money.

We bring this up not because this is some "hare-brained" conspiracy theory, but because an influential Chinese central bank adviser delivered a rare critique of his nation’s economic policy, urging the government to set a compulsory target for inflation, step up spending to address weak consumption and even start helicopter money

In an article published this week, which cited his earlier speech in May, Huang Yiping - a prominent member of the People’s Bank of China’s monetary policy committee - said that authorities should change their strategy of “focusing on investment and neglecting consumption,” shift policy preference from investment to consumption, set a hard CPI target of 2-3%, adopt fiscal measures to support consumption (such as allowing migrant workers to settle in cities, something which would spark a new Chinese housing bubble overnight) and last but not least, directly send money to households!

“The economy has entered a new stage and the total demand — including consumption, exports and even investment — is no longer as strong as before,” said Huang. “This actually poses new challenges to macroeconomic policies.” Meanwhile an excessive focus on fiscal health - such as maintaining the budget deficit below 3% of gross domestic product even when growth is weak - is now hindering China's economy and eroding room for future policy action, he said.

The reason for the sudden scramble: Huang believes that if the Chinese economy falls into the trap of low inflation (like Japan) "the consequences will be severe", and here we agree wholeheartedly. In fact, we are surprised that amid growing social discontent, record youth unemployment and a tendency for China's middle class to revolt, Beijing hasn't done this already. Maybe it will - soon - and in doing so would spark an inflationary shockwave around the globe.

Rebalancing China’s two-speed economy has been a challenge as authorities lean on manufacturing to propel growth while risking a backlash by creating a global glut of exports.

The transcript of Huang’s speech was only released in the wake of the Communist Party’s twice-a-decade meeting on reforms that left investors disappointed and pushed Chinese stocks sharply lower. The Third Plenum proposed few solutions to the economy’s most pressing problems, as top leaders reaffirmed manufacturing as the centerpiece of the economy, despite rising trade tensions, while pushing the same worn out policies that have failed to kickstart China's sinking economy.

Huang’s frank assessment comes as public critiques of Chinese government measures have become increasingly fraught as policymakers struggle to arrest a slowdown. Analysts have been advised to avoid discussing sensitive terms such as “deflation” or expressing views deemed overly negative for the economy.

Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of China’s state-backed Global Times, was banned from posting on social media after he wrote controversial comments about the economy, Bloomberg reported on Thursday, citing a person familiar with the matter.

Having learned how not to trigger his overlords, Huang highlighted falling prices - without using the word “deflation ”- as the key issue requiring greater attention, and advocated for setting a hard target for China’s consumer price index to increase by 2%-3%. Policymakers have consistently aimed for inflation at 3% in the past, but it’s regarded as a celling, not necessarily something that must be achieved. In light of recent CPI prints that have stuck around 0% for much of the past year, Beijing will be delighted to recover 3% CPI. Or even 2%.

“The economy is now easy to cool but difficult to heat up,” said Huang, who’s also dean of the National School of Development at Peking University. “If it really falls into the low inflation trap, the consequences will be serious” said the central banker having learned from Japan's catastrophic experience.

After China extended its longest deflationary streak since 1999 last quarter, Huang raised the question of whether the world’s No. 2 economy could fall into the same cycle as Japan, which suffered decades of deflation and was referenced more than a dozen times in his remarks.

Huang was careful to strike a constructive tone in his lengthy speech, with the government’s policies only characterized as being “mild” and “new conditions emerging in the economy” blamed for measures having a weaker effect than desired. China’s home sales slumped again in July, despite Beijing unveiling this year its most forceful efforts yet to support the property market that’s suffering a prolonged crisis.

According to Huang, two popular but flawed views were hindering policies. One was the belief that only structural reform can lift productivity, and the second was an aversion to adopting the more aggressive policies taken by Western countries.

Massive stimulus unleashed by the US and Europe in recent years had effectively supported those markets, without triggering significant negative consequences, added Huang, who has worked at investment banks including Citigroup and Barclays, and who clearly has someone do his shopping for him with a corporate card. Yes, his assessment is idiotic - the massive stimulus has unleashed even more massive inflation - but for China and its 1.3 billion citizens, deflation is even more dangerous than inflation.

Huang returned as a PBOC adviser this year after serving in that role between 2015 and 2018. He’s previously called for the PBOC to cut interest rates even as the US Federal Reserve began to hike, and flagged the risk of overseas push-back on China’s industrial policies, something which will be in full force once Donald Trump returns to the White House.

Huang said both the central bank and the Finance Ministry were trying to preserve future policy space, but what are they waiting for when the country desperately needs to reboot its economy here and now, and waiting too long threatens the very stability of the social fabric. Too conservative measures could threaten longer-term economic stability, he added.

Pressure on the balance sheets of households, businesses and local governments is feeding the economy’s weakness, according to Huang. This means the central government needs to shoulder more responsibility and stabilize confidence, he said.

“If the deteriorating trend is not stopped, it can lead to very serious consequences.”

While it is unclear of Huang speaks for others beside himself (it is no secret that lately Chinese social media has seen a tidal wave of censorship seeking to counter angry complaints about the slowing economy), one thing is certain: if the US slides into a recession, which now seems inevitable, China will have no choice but to do what the PBOC advisor suggests, as the only remaining pillar propping up China's economy - US imports - slowly fades away. Should that happen, and should Trump implement the reflationary tariffs (up to 100%) he hopes to put in place once elected, the inflationary tsunami that awaits in 2025 will make the galloping inflation from the early 1980s seem like a very gentle rise in prices by comparison.

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/beijing-helicopter-taking-china-central-banker-calls-direct-money-transfers-households

Shapiro Downplays IDF Volunteerism As 'Service Project' As Wikipedia Scrubs Evidence

 by Matt Margolis via PJ Media (emphasis ours),

AP Photo/Matt Rourke

It seems inevitable that Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-Pa.) is going to be chosen as Kamala Harris's running mate. 

Assuming this is correct, the goal of selecting Shapiro is to put Pennsylvania back in play for the Democratic ticket—if not completely out of play for Donald Trump. But, Shapiro's Jewish heritage and pro-Israel positions are likely to cause a real problem with the far left. Shapiro is one of the only candidates that is outwardly auditioning to be Kamala's running mate, and sadly, he's already trying to memory-hole his support of Israel.

First is the way he's distancing himself from his past position that peace "will never come" to the Middle East and that a two-state solution wasn't likely to succeed.

In the opinion article, titled “Peace not possible,” Shapiro, then a 20-year-old student at the University of Rochester, argued that a negotiated accord between Israeli and Palestinian leaders would not end conflict in the region, writing: “Using history as precedent, peace between Arabs and Israelis is virtually impossible and will never come.”

He described the Arab world as fractious, and wrote that the then-Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat was in danger of being assassinated “by his fellow belligerent Arabs.”

Palestinians will not coexist peacefully,” Shapiro wrote. “They do not have the capabilities to establish their own homeland and make it successful even with the aid of Israel and the United States. They are too battle-minded to be able to establish a peaceful homeland of their own.”

Shapiro now insists he supports a two-state solution.

“I was 20,” he said. “I have said for years, years before October 7, that I favor a two-state solution — Israelis and Palestinians living peacefully side-by-side, being able to determine their own futures and their own destiny.”

For sure, views can evolve, but Shapiro is also now sadly downplaying something he shouldn't. In the same aforementioned op-ed, he identified himself as a former volunteer for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

Today, however, his campaign is downplaying that.

“While he was in high school, Josh Shapiro was required to do a service project, which he and several classmates completed through a program that took them to a kibbutz in Israel where he worked on a farm and at a fishery,” Manuel Bonder, a spokesman for Shapiro, told The Times of Israel. “The program also included volunteering on service projects on an Israeli army base. At no time was he engaged in any military activities."

Simultaneously, Shapiro's volunteering for the IDF has been scrubbed from his Wikipedia page.

Imagine being so desperate to be chosen as Kamala Harris's running mate that you would look at volunteering for the IDF as something not to be proud of because you're trying to appease the antisemitic and anti-Zionist wing of the Democratic Party. This is the Democratic Party of today.

 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/josh-shapiro-downplays-idf-volunteerism-service-project-wikipedia-scrubs-evidence

Dramatic 1-Day and 1-Week Changes in Bond Yields, What Happened?

 Economic data has been weakening for weeks, culminating in a horrible Jobs report on Friday, August 2.

Treasury yields from the New York Fed, chart by Mish

US Treasury Yield Changes

  • 2-Year: Yield on the 2-year US Treasury note declined 28 basis points (.28 percentage points) on Friday leading the plunge. In the last three days, the 2-year yield plunged nearly a half-point.
  • 10-Year: Yield on the 10-year US Treasury note declined 19 basis points on Friday. In the last week, the 10-year yield plunged nearly a half-point, taking four days longer and more evenly spread out than the change in the two-year yield.
  • 30-Year: Yield on the 30-year US Treasury note declined 16 basis points on Friday. In the last week, the 30-year yield plunged 43 basis points.

US Treasury Yield Spreads Daily

Steepening and Bigger Inversions?!

The long-end of the curve is more inverted (the long end yield minus 3-month yield is increasingly negative), while the long-end vs. the two-year yield dramatically steepened.

The 10yr-2ry spread is about to turn positive. The 30yr-2yr turned slightly positive on July 15 then dipped negative. The 30yr-2yr spread then turned positive on July 23 and is now the most positive since June 7, 2022.

Many view the yield curve steepening as a recession confirmation indicator, but the signal is not that reliable. However, the sudden steepening does add to other data that also suggests recession.

US Treasury Yields Daily

Why the Waterfall?

July 31: Small Business Employment Growth Is Now Negative (and What It Means)

ADP data shows year-over-year payroll growth is negative 88,000 for small corporations sized 20-49. Trends are negative in all but very large corporations.

August 1: The Manufacturing ISM Index Is Lower Than Every Economist’s Estimate

The ISM manufacturing report was a disaster from every angle, especially employment , production, and backlogs. Employment reading worst since June 2020.

August 1: Commercial Construction Spending Is Down 9 Consecutive Months

Here’s the kicker: It’s not office related. And the Census Department has heavy negative revisions to spending. Let’s investigate.

August 1: Intel Announces 15,000 Job Cuts, 15 Percent of its Workforce

Intel received $8.5 billion in Biden administration grants (Inflation Reduction Act) but announces massive layoffs and halts dividends due to a decline in revenue.

August 2: Unemployment Rate Jumps, Jobs Rise Only 114,000 with More Negative Revisions

The headline jobs number was much weaker than the consensus estimate of 180,000 and the unemployment rate rose 0.2 percentage points.

Recession Has Started

On July 8, I wrote Weak Data Says a Recession Has Already Started, Let’s Now Discuss When

I’ve seen enough. A recession has started. Let’s discuss starting with a very good indicator that has few false positives and no false negatives.

My follow-up post was on August 2.

August 2: The McKelvey (Sahm) Unemployment Rate Recession Rule Just Triggered

A recession indicator based off rising unemployment triggered in July. Claudia Sahm, a former Fed economist, takes credit for an indicator she did not invent. Let’s discuss.

Weakening data explains the recession call. Yield curve action provides a confirmation signal.

https://mishtalk.com/economics/dramatic-1-day-and-1-week-changes-in-bond-yields-what-happened/

"Greater Than 50-50 Chance": SpaceX May Save Stranded Boeing Starliner Crew At ISS

 Boeing's crewed Starliner spacecraft mission to the International Space Station was initially expected to last just a few days, but it has stretched into weeks and now two months. 

The two astronauts, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, have been stranded on the ISS following Starliner's helium leaks and failing thrusters in early June.

NASA and Boeing have been working to resolve Starliner's issues, but progress has been limited.

The big story here is that, after two months, Boeing has yet to publicly ask Elon Musk's SpaceX for help. Optically, this would be a major blow to Boeing's image, especially considering the series of mid-air mishaps involving its 737Max commercial jets. Additionally, it's an election year for the Biden administration, which has been on a crusade against Trump and his supporters, but also is very anti-Musk. Any rescue mission by SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft is undesirable news flow for Democrats.

However, a new report from Ars Technica, citing various sources, indicates SpaceX could be publicly called up to save the day.  

Here's more from Ars Technica:

For a long time, it seemed almost certain that the astronauts would return to Earth inside Starliner. However, there has been a lot of recent activity at NASA, Boeing, and SpaceX that suggests that Wilmore and Williams could come home aboard a Crew Dragon spacecraft rather than Starliner.

The report continued:

One informed source said it was greater than a 50-50 chance that the crew would come back on Dragon. Another source said it was significantly more likely than not they would. To be clear, NASA has not made a final decision. This probably will not happen until at least next week. It is likely that Jim Free, NASA's associate administrator, will make the call.

On Thursday evening, NASA spokesperson Josh Finch told Ars, "NASA is evaluating all options for the return of agency astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams from the International Space Station as safely as possible. No decisions have been made and the agency will continue to provide updates on its planning." 

X users are wondering why the stranded Starliner story is not huge news. 

Imagine that... Trump's wealthiest supporter could save the day on the ISS.

Where is Bezos' rocket?

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/greater-50-50-chance-spacex-may-save-stranded-boeing-starliner-crew-iss

'Ivermectin Has Surprising Potential Against Cancer'

 By James Stansbury

I first heard that ivermectin (IVM) has significant potential to treat cancer in an Epoch Times video interview featuring Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, who has partnered with the FLCCC (Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance) to research it. Recall that IVM is the same “horse dewormer” the FDA and others in the medical industrial complex went to great lengths to discourage as a Covid-19 treatment. In the video, Dr. Ruddy suggested why so little research is being done on it: “…the pharmaceutical industries were not going to invest in a $0.10 pill. If the pharmaceutical industries were not willing to do that, no one else was going to do it, because pharma funds everyone that is doing research.”

As a prostate cancer survivor, I was especially drawn to her first example of Paul Mann who was perfectly healthy with no family history of cancer and suddenly diagnosed with stage 4 prostate cancer. He went through all the known cancer treatments with no success so his status was terminal with his cancer metastasizing to 11 bones. Paul’s PSA (Prostrate-Specific Antigen Test) was off the charts between 700 and 800. To put Paul’s PSA number in perspective, when mine spiked past 12, my urologist gave me only two options, either schedule surgery or start radiation.

It was very obvious that Paul was totally out of options and by chance he had a friend who was acquainted with Dr. Ruddy and knew of her cancer research. He connected the two. They discussed his past treatments and symptoms at length telephonically and in one of those consultations Dr. Ruddy asked; “Paul, I don’t know if this [IVM] is going to help you, but I know it’s not going to hurt you.” He agreed to try it and two months later his PSA number was down to 1.3, meaning he was in biochemical remission. However, he still had the bone metastasis. Nine months later, he gets a head-to-toe scan that found three bone cancers were totally gone and the rest could be treated with radiation. Now he is back to work and doing well. 

Getting a prescription for IVM in 2022 was difficult. Paul had to go to Tennessee because it was available there without a prescription due to passage of a new law signed in April 2022. Although the law may sound reckless, state legislators had much expert assistance from highly respected medical professionals including Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Richard Urso, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. John Little and many others. These doctors assured that the law included safeguards requiring a description of the patient’s symptoms, a list of any preexisting conditions and list of other medications being taken so the right dosage could be determined by the pharmacist. Paul’s IVM prescription even showed up in his oncologist’s records in Missouri without being requested. 

More personal research found that the FLCCC was not the first to discover the potential of IVM for treating cancer. A September 2020 study in the NIH National Library of Medicine revealed similar encouraging evidence:

“Abstract: “Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells. This may be related to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways by ivermectin through PAK1 kinase. On the other hand, ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs.”

Cancer types where IVM was tested and found to be effective:

2.1 Breast cancer

2.2 Digestive system cancer

2.3 Urinary system [including prostate] cancer

2.4 Hematological [leukemia] cancer

2.5 Reproductive system cancer

2.6 Brain glioma

2.7 Respiratory system cancer

2.8 Melanoma

Even earlier in June 2019, the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research had also published similar positive news about IVM and cancer. “Thus, ivermectin, a FDA-approved antiparasitic drug, could potentially be used in combination with chemotherapeutic agents to treat cancers and in particular, the drug-resistant cancers.” 

After learning of these multiple breakthrough findings, I could not help but wonder why so little about this discovery has been mentioned in the legacy media. Apparently, I am not alone in suspecting the news is being suppressed. However, the influential Associated Press furnished an answer in Feb. 2023 in its half-truth assessment: 

“CLAIM: Searches on the National Institutes of Health website show that ivermectin is a cure for cancer but it is being suppressed.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The website shows that some studies have explored the use of ivermectin in relation to cancer. There are no studies demonstrating the drug cures cancer in humans, experts say, but some are researching the use of ivermectin in combination with other therapies to treat breast cancer.”

Is the AP’s negative assessment a sign that there will be resistance preventing IVM from being used as a cancer treatment? After all, there are conflicts of interest. (1) If IVM is approved and proves to be an effective cancer cure it could cut into healthcare industry profits. (2) From the patient’s perspective, IVM could save millions of lives or at a minimum it could reduce the lengthy, painful, and extremely expensive cancer treatments. And those downstream cost savings for the patient will likely benefit taxpayer funded Medicaid/Medicare and private health insurance providers as well.

For now, nothing will change immediately for most cancer patients because the FDA drug approval process is lengthy and subject to pressure from lobbyists. However, as many as 28 states are considering legislation to get around the FDA similar to the Tennessee law, according to Becker's Hospital Review, a newsletter catering to healthcare professionals. However, the article regrettably did not list the states. Of interest, some of the reader comments in their newsletter were a mixed bag, including some very hostile to IVM and the FLCCC.  

Regardless, we should thank God there are still conscientious medical personnel like those in the FLCCC and similar organizations with the courage to independently do the necessary cancer research on IVM despite the lack of grant money from either big pharma or the government.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/07/ivermectin_has_surprising_potential_against_cancer.html

Biden's and Harris's self-vaunted economy starts to crater

 The jobs numbers are out. The NASDAQ is tanking. And just like that, Joe Biden's and Kamala Harris's claims to have "saved" the economy are down in the rising rubble of a fresh-made economic crater.

According to the New York Times:

Stocks skidded on Friday, capping off a turbulent week for Wall Street, as investors were jolted by data showing that hiring slowed and unemployment rose in July.

The spiking uncertainty about the economic outlook, and the question of whether the Federal Reserve has been too slow to cut interest rates, was evident across financial markets.

Which is ugly stuff for the American people as it puts paid to the Biden-Harris camp's claim to have "rescued" the U.S. economy.

No, they didn't rescue it. They took the COVID lockdown disaster, pumped a few trillion into the economy for a slew of government spending, creating a sugar high for some, and now are seeing the comedown, the cratering, the acceleration of a major economic downturn that won't ever be fixed based on anything they ever do. It will stay a nightmare and citizens can only hope it won't get worse.

But it will get worse.

Inflation after all, isn't over. As Beege Welborn noted in his excellent piece on HotAir, that inflation costs the average American family an extra $13,000 a year, money forcibly spent for nothing.

Meanwhile, the federal government gets its own version of inflation, with interest payments on the national debt now topping defense spending, which is Biden's and Harris's real "historic first." That money, too, is money for nothing. It could have been spent on useful things if there were enough economy to spend such things on, but government's expansion has crowded out the private sector, making less for it to be used on. What happens when there's too much money floating around in the system? That's right, it's inflation, money for nothing, same thing as torments the private sector except that it drives that inflation the consumers have to "pay for."

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris rant a lot about tax cuts and whether they are "paid for," ignoring that tax revenues go up, not down, when there are tax cuts for voters. But neither Biden nor Harris talk about the inflation they create through all their government spending being "paid for" whether consumers like it or not. They pay.

That courses through the economy in the form of declining purchasing management inventories as Welborn's piece noted, through falling consumer and business confidence, through falling expectations, through retail price rises, culminating at the end in falling employment, the last final indicator of an economy going south.

Unemployment is at 4.3% now and jobs created are falling. Nobody creates jobs without a reasonable expectation of economic growth to justify them. That's where we are now, at the jobs collapse. That's the wages of vast government spending with no economy to absorb the dollars printed to pay for them.

 

Now it's going to get bad. Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon, as Milton Friedman taught. Joe Biden has mocked Friedman in the past with the claim that he's "not in charge any more." Kamala Harris is vowing a massive $2 trillion spending program for "childcare," a pork program so bad even the Democrats couldn't get it through Congress back when Biden and Harris were passing big spending bills. If she gets her way through the presidency, that will stoke the inflation monster even more.

But while Biden mocks and Harris has never heard of Friedman or Economics 101, Friedman's truths are still in charge, they always are.

Now it's time to pay the piper. This is what President Trump and Sen. J.D. Vance must hammer the Biden-Harris clown show with everything they've got, knowing that consumers are feeling this and knowing exactly what it takes to stop this.

They need to hit hard, because the deluge is on us.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/08/biden_s_and_harris_s_self_vaunted_economy_starts_to_crater.html

'F--- white women!' Harris ally told Zoom meeting full of leftists

 By Monica Showalter

Kamala Harris has always had trouble keeping staff based on her nasty, bullying, personality, but she sure does well with people who talk like this in her tree.

According to Fox News:

Cora Masters Barry, an appointee of Democrat D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and longtime civil rights activist, and Melanie Campbell, who leads the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, have visited the White House more than 50 times combined during the Biden administration, including nearly a dozen visits with Harris or her staff, a Fox News Digital review found.

Weeks before President Biden and Harris were sworn into office in 2021, Barry and Campbell participated in a public Zoom call in which they made controversial statements about Trump supporters and used an expletive against White voters, specifically White women, which could cause some internal clashes as different coalitions mobilize to try to get Harris into the White House.

... and ...

“We have to change our strategy. We got to get our people. We have to get our – they got their people. They got all the trailer parks all covered,” Barry said during the Zoom. “All them people up in West Virginia and the hills, they’re covered. They got them all the way there to Wall Street.”

“[Trump] did that, and we’re sitting here talking about the White women. F–k the white women– excuse me – forget the White women. They’re going to do what the White men tell them to do,” Barry continued, eliciting laughter and clapping from Campbell.

“What they tell themselves,” Campbell interjected.

“They be smiling in their faces, they want to stay in charge,” Barry continued, with Campbell reacting affirmatively in the background. “I don’t care nothing about them, we got to do what we got to do.”

Barry went on to say that the Black community has to “get real serious about organizing to elect Kamala Harris as the next President of the United States” and that she doesn’t “want no women’s parade.”

“If they have another Women’s March – I’ll go over there and blow it up,” Barry said.

Barry also attacked supporters of then-President Trump, comparing them to the Ku Klux Klan by saying, “I’m not saying everyone who voted for Trump is wearing a white sheet, but they got one in their closet, and it comes out when we start messing with the economic value or the balance of power.”

Had enough?

Seems there a lot of people in Kamala's inner circle, the kind who haven't fled from her perhaps because she is a kindred spirit, who have bottomless contempt for white female voters, particularly the ones who don't vote the way they like.

They take orders from their husbands. Childless cat ladies, eat your hearts out.

They are low class and live in trailer parks. Deplorables, eat your hearts out.

Despite being low class and living in trailer parks, they somehow have all the power, and refuse to give it up, presumably to Kamala and her ilk.

Despite being powerful trailer park denizens clinging to power like Nicolas Maduro, they hold pink-pussycat hatted marches, which one of them wants to firebomb, being a violent sort.

They are all closet Klansmen, including even the ones who aren't.

Wow. What a picture to paint of a sizable section of the voter base, both Trump supporters and pink-pussycat-hatted anti-Trump marchers. The only thing they have in common is being white, and this pair doesn't like it.

So all those "white women for Kamala" who have been meeting on Zoom and having "honest conversations" about race, reportedly 164,000 of them, can now eat that up, and given that it's them, they will probably like it.

But the remainder of the white female population probably won't. It ought to get out that this is what the Kamala group says in private about the people whose votes it thinks it has bagged up.

While the press complains about J.D. Vance's off the cuff public remarks about leftists being "childless cat ladies," here's where the real contempt for women rests, well within the Kamala camp and one can only wonder just how much Kamala joins in the fun with them when the Zoom mike is off. She does mentally feed them, so it's fair to say it's probably a lot.

No wonder her staff flees.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/08/f_white_women_harris_ally_told_zoom_meeting_full_of_leftists_report.html